SDM Bank
SDM Bank
Article history: The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between the
Received 08 March 2022 work environment on job satisfaction, the relationship between the
Revised 12 Apr 2022 HR e-system on job satisfaction, the relationship between the work
Accepted 08 June 2022 environment and employee performance, the relationship between
the HR e-system on employee performance, the relationship between
job satisfaction and employee performance. This study uses a
quantitative approach. The scope of the research object is determined
by the variables of the HR e-System, Work Environment, Job
Satisfaction, Work Motivation, and Bank Employee Performance.
The sampling technique uses purposive sampling. The number of
samples specified in this study were 500 respondents who were
distributed through Google Form. Data collection techniques can be
done with online questionnaires distributed through social media.
Sources of data that directly provide data to data collectors are
derived from primary sources by distributing tools, namely
Keywords: questionnaires to employees at the Bank. The instrument uses a
Electronic Human Resource System ( E- questionnaire with a Likert scale using 5 (five) scores ranging from
System) answers to statements provided through tools from a scale of '1'
Environment Strongly Disagree to a scale of '5' Strongly Agree. Data analysis
Job Satisfaction techniques use structural equation modeling (structural equation
Employee Performance modeling). or abbreviated as SEM. This research data processing
Private Bank Employee tool uses the SmartPLS application or software. The results of this
study are that there is a positive and significant relationship between
the work environment and job satisfaction. There is a positive and
significant relationship between the HR e-system on job satisfaction.
There is a positive and significant relationship between the work
environment and employee performance. There is a positive and
significant relationship between the HR e-system on employee
performance. There is a positive and significant relationship between
job satisfaction and employee performance.
Copyright © 2022 International Journal of Artificial Intelegence Research.
All rights reserved.
I. Introduction
According to Farhan et al. (2021); Ibrahim et al. (2022) In the industrial revolution 4.0
era, dynamic organizations will always increase their productivity through consistently
producing the best performance and maintaining the competitive advantage, and the factor
that is considered the most potential in improving performance is the human resource (HR)
factor. and realizing an organizational plan through human resources (HR) of course
requires several supporting aspects, one of which is the application of an adequate
information technology system. According to Al-Harazneh et al. (2021) Information
technology is an integral part of an organization. The development of information
technology is marked by hardware and software innovations that have an impact on the
complexity of information technology devices and become a challenge for organizations.
Therefore, the use of information technology must also be based on the effectiveness of
II. Method
This study uses a quantitative approach. The scope of the research object is determined by the
variables of the HR e-System, Work Environment, Job Satisfaction, Work Motivation, and Bank
Employee Performance. The sampling technique uses purposive sampling. The number of samples
specified in this study were 500 respondents who were distributed through Google Form. Data
collection techniques can be done with online questionnaires distributed through social media.
Sources of data that directly provide data to data collectors are derived from primary sources by
distributing tools, namely questionnaires to employees at the Bank. The instrument uses a
questionnaire with a Likert scale using 5 (five) scores ranging from answers to statements provided
through tools from a scale of '1' Strongly Disagree to a scale of '5' Strongly Agree. Data analysis
techniques use structural equation modeling (structural equation modeling). or abbreviated as SEM.
This research data processing tool uses the SmartPLS application or software. After that, an
evaluation of the SEM model is carried out to obtain and evaluate the proposed suitability and
further testing will be carried out using the Bootstrap resampling method developed by Geisser &
Stone. The test statistic used is the t statistic (t-value) or if the p-value 0.05 (at 5 percent alpha), it is
concluded that the results are significant.
to see the reliability of indicators on a variable will be considered eligible if it has a value greater
than 0.70.
The R-Square Adjusted output assigned to the Job Satisfaction variable is 0.898, meaning that it
has a predictive power for the influence of the Work Environment and HR E-System of 89.8 percent
while the remaining 10.2 percent is influenced by other factors. Furthermore, the R-Square Adjusted
output of Employee Performance is 0.943, meaning that it has predictive power for the variables of
Work Environment, HR E-System, Job Satisfaction and Work Motivation (as Moderator) of 94.3
percent, the remaining 5.7% percent is influenced by other factors. The f-Square (f2) test is used at a
later stage to determine the magnitude of the effect of the endogenous latent variable on the
exogenous latent variable. The f2 values of 0.02, 0.15 and 0.35 can be interpreted whether the latent
variable indicator has a weak, medium or large influence on the structural level.
H1: There is a positive and significant relationship between work environment and job satisfaction
After the data meets the measurement requirements, the research is continued by conducting
bootstrapping method on SmartPLS with a significance level of 0.05 where if the p-values are less
than
of 0.05 or t-values greater than t-critical (1.96) means that the alternative hypothesis is
accepted.The summary of the path diagram with the output t-values above is based on the results of
the hypothesis test in Figure 3 of each effect tested. Work Environment has an effect on Job
Satisfaction, with a t-value of > 1.96 which means that it has a significant effect (H1 is accepted).
This finding is in accordance with previous empirical evidence which shows that the influence of the
physical and non-physical work environment has a significant effect on employee job satisfaction.
According to Nayak et al. (2021); Pallawagau, A. (2021); Parry, E., & Tyson, S. (2011); Purwanto et
al. (2022) positively.
H2: There is a positive and significant relationship between the HR e-system on job satisfaction
After the data meets the measurement requirements, the research is continued by conducting
bootstrapping method on SmartPLS with a significance level of 0.05 where if the p-values are less
than
of 0.05 or t-values greater than t-critical (1.96) means that the alternative hypothesis is accepted.
The work environment is one of the supporting factors in employee performance which if the
environment is good then employees will consider the company still a better place to work. HR E-
System has an effect on Job Satisfaction, with a t-value of > 1.96 which means that it has a
significant effect (H2 is accepted). This finding is in accordance with previous empirical evidence.
According to Nayak et al. (2021); Pallawagau, A. (2021); Purwanto et al. (2022) which shows that
MIS has a positive effect on improving employee performance (Wiranda, Prihatini, & Hidayat,
2015). HR e-System values that match the value of job satisfaction can have significant benefits in
developing the company with the aim of reducing costs by reducing employee behavior and
increasing employee productivity.
H3 : There is a positive and significant relationship between the work environment and employee
performance
After the data meets the measurement requirements, the research is continued by using the
bootstrapping method on SmartPLS with a significance level of 0.05 where if the p-values are less
than 0.05 or t-values are greater than t-critical (1.96) it means an alternative hypothesis. declared
accepted According to Ruël et al. (2004); Sudirman et al. (2021); Shamout et al. (2022); Thathsara et
al. (2021); Strohmeier (2007) which provides empirical evidence that the work environment has no
significant effect on employee performance while the work environment has a positive and
significant effect on satisfaction. According to Al-Harazneh et al. (2021); Asbari et al. (2021); Dewi
et al. (2021); Farhan et al. (2021); Ibrahim et al. (2022) A good working environment is one of the
factors supporting employee productivity. Therefore, a conducive work environment is needed to
support employee performance in carrying out their work, so that the work results obtained can be
achieved optimally. According to Nayak et al. (2021); Pallawagau, A. (2021); Parry, E., & Tyson, S.
(2011); Purwanto et al. (2022) A good information system can also be seen from the ability of
employees to access, understand, and use and utilize the information generated in assisting the
completion of work.
H4 : There is a positive and significant relationship between the HR e-system on employee
performance
After the data meets the measurement requirements, the research is continued by conducting
bootstrapping method on SmartPLS with a significance level of 0.05 where if the p-values are less
than
of 0.05 or t-values greater than t-critical (1.96) means that the alternative hypothesis is accepted.
Work Environment has an effect on Employee Performance, with a t-value of > 1.96 which means
that it has a significant effect (H3 is accepted), then the HR e-System also has an effect on Employee
Performance, with a t-value of 2.283 which means it is also significantly influential (H4 is
accepted). These two findings are in accordance with previous empirical evidence which shows the
influence of MIS and work environment significantly on employee performance but not in
accordance with research
H5: There is a positive and significant relationship between job satisfaction and employee
performance
With a good information system it will produce optimal performance. Job satisfaction has an
effect on employee performance, with a t-value of 4.090 meaning that it has a significant effect (H5
is accepted). This finding is in accordance with previous empirical evidence which shows that
between the variables of job satisfaction and performance there is a linear relationship and the effect
of job satisfaction on bank employee productivity and also a positive and significant influence on
satisfaction on employee performance. . (2021); Khashman et al. (2022); Kumari et al.
(2021);Muliati et al. (2022); Majid et al.. (2021); Myllymäki et al. (2021) which does not prove the
moderating effect of the work environment on employee performance on employee performance.
This is also of course evidenced by the fulfillment of work environment indicators such as always
trying to complete work more than the targeted number, always trying to correct mistakes, making
lessons not to repeat mistakes, being self-improvement, paying attention to details in work,
completing work with good results. neat and tidy makes employees feel appreciated and supported
by the company to improve long-term careers that will improve company performance. Given the
importance of motivation for individuals as an inherent drive or motive and influence certain
behaviors as well as efforts to develop the personal life concerned.
IV. Conclusion
The conclusion of the research aimed at specifically examining the effect of the HR e-System
and Work Environment, Job Satisfaction and Work Motivation as a liaison on the performance of
banking employees within the Digital Payment Work Unit resulted in the essence, namely the
research results obtained facts in the form of a very significant relationship and has value the t
statistic is 4.285, this understanding provides an illustration that the work environment has an impact
on increasing job satisfaction. The results of the study obtained facts in the form of a very significant
relationship, this understanding illustrates that the HR e-System will also have an impact on
increasing Job Satisfaction in Work Units at the Bank. The results of the study obtained facts in the
form of a significant relationship, this understanding illustrates that the work environment has an
impact on improving employee performance in the work unit at the bank. The results of the study
obtained facts in the form of a significant relationship. This understanding illustrates that the HR e-
System will also have an impact on improving employee performance at the bank. The results of the
study obtained facts in the form of a significant relationship, this understanding illustrates that the
work environment moderated by work motivation has an impact on improving employee
performance in the work unit at the bank. can be said to affect the Employee Performance variable.
The results of this study have implications for the management of the need for synergy between
sections in the unit. work in optimizing programs that have an impact on improving employee
performance. The work environment is one that has an important effect on employee performance.
Further surveys are needed to evaluate the work environment in order to further increase job
satisfaction and its impact on employee performance. Appreciation to employees when employees
can complete certain tasks must be done so that employees are motivated to work which directly has
a significant influence on job satisfaction.
References
[1] Al-Harazneh, Y. M., & Sila, I. (2021). The impact of E-HRM usage on HRM effectiveness: highlighting
the roles of top management support, HR professionals, and line managers. Journal of Global
Information Management (JGIM), 29(2), 118-147.
[2] Asbari, M., Hidayat, D. D., & Purwanto, A. (2021). Managing employee performance: From leadership
to readiness for change. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 2(1), 74-85.
[3] Dewi, A. R. S., Fachmi, M., Ilyas, G. B., & Mustafa, H. (2021). The Relationship Between Discipline
and Motivation on Employee Performance Through Mediation Of Job Satisfaction.
[4] Farhan, A. F., Salamzadeh, Y., & Richardson, C. (2021). The Impact of E-HRM On Employee
Productivity-Mediating Role of Innovation. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(6), 5033-
5050.
[5] Ibrahim, F., Suhip, H., Kura, K. M., & Noor, L. H. (2022). Exploratory Study on User Satisfaction of E-
HRM: Evidence From Brunei Government Employee Management System (GEMS). In Handbook of
Research on Developing Circular, Digital, and Green Economies in Asia (pp. 243-271). IGI Global.
[6] Ismail, F. B., Ling, L. S., Kadir, A. A., & Al Hosaini, A. A. H. (2021). Employee satisfaction and
performance of E-HRM system in Malaysia banking sector. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell
Biology, 6721-6729.
[7] Khashman, A. M. (2022). The Impact of Electronic Human Resource Management (E-HRM) Strategies
on Organizational Innovation by Knowledge Repository as Mediating Role. In Research Anthology on
Human Resource Practices for the Modern Workforce (pp. 1352-1374). IGI Global.
[8] Kumari, K., Barkat Ali, S., & Abbas, J. (2021). Examining the role of motivation and reward in
employees’ job performance through mediating effect of job satisfaction: an empirical evidence.
International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 10(4), 401-420.
[9]
[10] Muliati, L., Asbari, M., Nadeak, M., Novitasari, D., & Purwanto, A. (2022). Elementary School
Teachers Performance: How The Role of Transformational Leadership, Competency, and Self-Efficacy?.
International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 3(1), 158-166.
[11] Majid, A., Fajri, M. B., Assadam, E., & Febrianti, D. (2021). The Moderating Effect of Job Satisfaction
to Work Motivation and Employees’ Performance. International Journal of Science, Technology &
Management, 2(3), 550-560.
[12] Myllymäki, D. (2021). Beyond the ‘e-’in e-HRM: integrating a sociomaterial perspective. The
International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(12), 2563-2591.
[13] Nayak, S., Budhwar, P., Pereira, V., & Malik, A. (2021). Exploring the dark-side of E-HRM: a study of
social networking sites and deviant workplace behavior. International Journal of Manpower.
[14] Pallawagau, A. (2021). The Impact of Organizational Culture, and Work Motivation on Employee
Performance Through Employee Job Satisfaction PT. Kasmar Tiar Raya. International Journal of
Economics, Management, Business, and Social Science (IJEMBIS), 1(1), 11-21.
[15] Parry, E., & Tyson, S. (2011). Desired goals and actual outcomes of e‐HRM. Human resource
management journal, 21(3), 335-354.
[16] Purwanto, A. (2022). The Role of Digital Leadership, e-loyalty, e-service Quality and e-satisfaction of
Indonesian E-commerce Online Shop. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 3(5), 51-
57.
[17] Purwanto, A., Novitasari, D., & Asbari, M. (2022). Tourist Satisfaction and Performance of Tourism
Industries: How The Role of Innovative Work Behaviour, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour?.
Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 3(1), 1-12.
[18] Purwanto, A., Asbari, M., & Santoso, T. I. (2021). Education Management Research Data Analysis:
Comparison of Results between Lisrel, Tetrad, GSCA, Amos, SmartPLS, WarpPLS, and SPSS For
Small Samples. Nidhomul Haq: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam.
[19] Purwanto, A., Purba, J. T., Bernarto, I., & Sijabat, R. (2021). Effect of transformational leadership, job
satisfaction, and organizational commitments on organizational citizenship behavior. Inovbiz: Jurnal
Inovasi Bisnis, 9(1), 61-69.
[20] Rivaldo, Y. (2021). Leadership and motivation to performance through job satisfaction of hotel
employees at D'Merlion Batam. The Winners, 22(1), 25-30.
[21] Riyanto, S., Endri, E., & Herlisha, N. (2021). Effect of work motivation and job satisfaction on
employee performance: Mediating role of employee engagement. Problems and Perspectives in
Management, 19(3), 162.
[22] Ruël, H., Bondarouk, T., & Looise, J. K. (2004). E-HRM: Innovation or irritation. An explorative
empirical study in five large companies on web-based HRM. Management revue, 364-380.
[23] Sudirman, A., Sherly, S., Candra, V., Dharma, E., & Lie, D. (2021). Determinants of Teacher
Performance: Exploring the Role of Satisfaction and Motivation as Mediation. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan
Pengajaran, 54(1), 68-79.
[24] Shamout, M., Elayan, M., Rawashdeh, A., Kurdi, B., & Alshurideh, M. (2022). E-HRM practices and
sustainable competitive advantage from HR practitioner’s perspective: A mediated moderation analysis.
International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6(1), 165-178.
[25] Thathsara, A. D. S., & Sutha, J. (2021). Investigating the influence of e-hrm practices on organizational
performance: The mediating role of organizational agility (with special reference to financial institution).
International Journal of Engineering and Management Research (IJEMR), 11(1), 1-8.
[26] Strohmeier, S. (2007). Research in e-HRM: Review and implications. Human resource management
review, 17(1), 19-37.