Bunaziv 2016
Bunaziv 2016
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Aluminum and its alloys are difficult to weld due to their specific characteristics. New joining methods
Received 6 October 2015 such as high power fiber laser-MIG can provide higher overall productivity compared to the arc welding
Received in revised form 29 January 2016 or laser beam welding. There is huge lack of information on how the specific welding parameters in laser-
Accepted 25 February 2016
arc hybrid welding affect quality of welds such as torch arrangement, distance between heat sources and
Available online 27 February 2016
shielding gas composition while other parameters were kept at constant. Laser-arc hybrid welds with
short separation distance between sources produced severe porosity in one pass 5 mm thick aluminum
Keywords:
alloy sheets welding due to unstable interactions and keyhole frequent collapses. Higher process stability
Hybrid welding
Fiber laser
and lower porosity level can be achieved by applying trailing torch arrangement. Addition of significantly
Porosity more expensive helium to the shielding gas did not provide any benefits in terms of porosity decrease,
Weld quality process stability and mechanical properties of welds overall as was expected with selected welding
Shielding gas parameters.
© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction where mainly CO2 , Nd:YAG laser beams coupled with TIG, MIG
arc sources has proven its application. Due to inherited filler wire
Aluminum alloys welding can be challenging due to their spe- deposition, MIG process can be more advantageous for welding alu-
cific properties such as high thermal conductivity that requires minum alloys compared to TIG due to possibility to manipulate
higher energy density power sources, high thermal expansion caus- microstructure, better bridgeability, and higher weld metal deposi-
ing higher distortions, high hydrogen and nitrogen solubility at tion capability. Nd:YAG and CO2 have been utilized for many years
high temperatures during fusion welding processes which gen- with TIG sources to join various aluminum alloys. As a result, no
erates porosity, aluminum oxide film Al2 O3 causing incomplete much information is available on fiber laser-MIG hybrid welding.
penetration, and low surface tension or viscosity. Aluminum alloys (Olsen, 2009)
welding with laser beam sources is more difficult due to stronger The first published research on fiber laser-MIG hybrid welding of
evaporization of alloying elements with high power densities that aluminum alloys was in 2004 by Thomy et al. (2005). Subsequently
can cause decreased mechanical properties of welds as stated Seto Allen et al. (2006), Wagner et al. (2006), Yan et al. (2014a,b), Leo
et al. (2001). Since aluminum is highly reflective material for long- et al. (2015), Casalino et al. (2014) applied fiber laser and MIG power
wavelength (10 600 nm) laser beams like CO2 , therefore a high sources with limited success. Casalino et al. (2014) reported coarse
power density threshold is required to form and maintain keyhole porosity, in form of ellipses, issues in welding of 3 mm thick AA5754
during welding process (Olsen, 2009). This can be maintained by due to interrupted dynamics of the keyhole related to low laser-to-
application of short-wavelength (about 1000 nm) laser beams that arc ratio.
require much lower minimum power density threshold to form a According to Leo et al. (2015), where the laser-to-arc power
keyhole. ratio was used as main variable as well, welded 3 mm 5000 series
In the past three decades, aluminum was welded with a suc- aluminum alloy, revealed micro-porosity throughout welds and
cess with proven TIG, MIG, PAW electric arc processes, as well as evaporation of the alloying elements (Mn, Mg) which reduced
with Nd:YAG and CO2 laser beam power sources. Hybrid welding mechanical properties when laser power was increased. The same
problems with evaporization of magnesium and manganese related
to deterioration of mechanical properties of joints were reported
∗ Corresponding author.
by Yan et al. (2014a,b). According to the aforementioned research it
E-mail address: [Link]@[Link] (I. Bunaziv).
can be concluded that no much attention were made to the helium
[Link]
0924-0136/© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
108 I. Bunaziv et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 233 (2016) 107–114
Table 1
Chemical composition (by weight) of base and filler material.
Table 2
Mechanical properties of base and filler material.
Material Min. Yield point Reh [N/mm2 ] Ultimate tensile strength Rm [N/mm2 ] Break elongation A [%]
Fig. 2. Schematic representation of movement direction of the filler wire molten metal in trailing MIG torch arrangement (a) and in leading MIG torch arrangement (b).
to loss of synergistic effect between two sources since increase of laser zone. The reinforcement height is considerably larger than
of separation distance led to loss of the preheating mechanism. leading torch setup. The reason is the same as decreased penetra-
In addition, with trailing torch setup the flow of molten metal tion effect. With trailing MIG torch arrangement, filler wire molten
differs from leading torch setup in such a way that excessive molten metal spreads more widely due to arc forces since it comes after
metal from filler wire present near keyhole compared to leading laser beam. Moreover, acting forces from arc source behave also
torch setup. This can cause the attenuation of laser beam power differently.
and disturbances of the keyhole. Concerning spattering and other defects which can be examined
The welded bead shape considerably differs when torch direc- visually, it was noticed that trailing torch arrangement provides less
tion was changed (see Fig. 3). Trailing torch direction setup spattering and undercuts compared to leading torch setup which
produces larger width of arc zone and slightly narrower weld width produced relatively much spatter. However, in trailing torch setup
Table 3
Constant parameters.
Table 4
Experimental design matrix.
Fig. 3. The effect of separation distance and MIG torch direction on weld appearance and quality in fiber laser-MIG hybrid welding of AA5083 with pure argon shielding gas
(100%).
the undercuts were also observed with 1 mm separation process. spattering level. In contrast, the trailing torch setup almost had no
Occasionally some overlapping was detected in leading torch setup. spattering. However, the bead appearance itself is worse than with
The possible reason of spattering in leading torch setup is that the leading torch setup. Trailing torch setup with 3 mm in separation
droplets of the molten metal from filler wire flow toward the region distance shows a lot of undercutting.
of keyhole after detachment and can block it as illustrated in Fig. 2, Leading torch setup demonstrates (see Fig. 4) full penetration
therefore it is highly possible that spattering is produced. In trail- with 1 mm and 3 mm separation distance and results are quite the
ing torch setup droplets are impinging surface, therefore it is not same as welding in pure argon. When separation distance equal
possible for them to move toward the keyhole (see Fig. 2). It was to 1 mm, the arc pressure in helium is increased, therefore the
noticed that the spattering level did not increase simultaneously reinforcement become more concave.
with increase of separation distance. The probable reason of under-
cuts formed in leading torch arrangement is that the arc is narrower
during hybrid welding.
It can be summarized that trailing torch (or laser leading) 3.3. Tensile test results
setup is more stable than leading torch setup when using pure
argon shielding gas. However, leading torch arrangement provides Transverse tensile strength testing was carried out at ambient
greater penetration and narrower weld shape. temperature (20 ◦ C) according to ISO 4136 and ISO 6892-1. The
results of tensile strength according to variables are presented in
Fig. 5. Since every specimen from experiments was broken in weld
3.2. The effect of process distance and MIG torch direction on seam area, it was possible to examine internal defects and to deter-
welds made in argon-helium mixture shielding gas mine the causes of reduced tensile strength. As can be seen from
Fig. 6 and Fig. 7, coarse porosity is probably the main cause of the
The behavior of penetration is slightly different in argon-helium lower tensile strength of welds compared to base metal, which has
shielding gas compared to pure argon shielding gas. No changes 148 MPa in average.
were noticed concerning sagging, porosity or weld shape from According to Fig. 5, in case of pure argon welding, when separa-
macrographs (see Fig. 3 and Fig. 4). Overall, the visual appearance tion distance at its minimum (1 mm), leading torch setup provides
of welds made with different shielding gases is very similar. better tensile strength since the porosity is lower than with trailing
In case of trailing torch with minimum separation distance torch setup (see Fig. 6). When the separation distance is increasing,
1 mm, the partial (intermitted) penetration was achieved (see trailing torch setup gives better tensile strength and less poros-
Fig. 4). When separation was increased by 2 mm (3 mm in total) ity, at separation distance of 5 mm trailing torch provides porosity
full penetration was reached. These results were unexpected since less than 5% and that quality is accepted by EN 13919-2 standard
in the case of pure argon shielding gas the separation distance is (D level). However, the tensile strength with trailing torch setup
increasing the penetration is decreasing. is decreasing slightly due to incomplete penetration. The poros-
The visual examination of welds revealed fairly the same ten- ity level with leading torch setup according to separation distance
dency of spattering and other defects. Leading torch setup had more behaves uniformly compared to trailing torch setup. The largest
spattering. The spattering level was the same as with pure argon separation distance promotes the highest level of porosity, in con-
shielding gas. Consequently, adding helium does not decrease the trast with trailing torch setup the porosity level was the lowest.
I. Bunaziv et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 233 (2016) 107–114 111
Fig. 4. The effect of separation distance and MIG torch direction on weld appearance and quality in fiber laser-MIG hybrid welding of AA5083 with argon-helium mixture
shielding gas (50%/50%).
Fig. 5. The effect of process separation distance and MIG torch direction on tensile strength of welds.
The tensile strength response of joints welded in argon-helium porosity with 1 mm separation distance (107 MPa)
mixture shielding gas differs from the joints welded in pure due to high amount of micro-porosity which is not
argon, since increase in separation distance between sources the clearly can be seen from Fig. 7. For the same reason
tensile strength decreases with either leading or trailing MIG torch the weld made in argon shielding gas, having 30%
directions due to porosity as shown in fractured workpieces along porosity level (leading torch, 3 mm separation distance)
welding line (see Fig. 7). The welding made with trailing torch setup demonstrated lower tensile strength.
has better tensile strength in overall. The reason is that the trailing The results of experiments concerning porosity indicates that
torch setup produced less porosity in the joint and probably has helium as shielding gas does not improve the problems with coarse
better stability of the keyhole during welding. The trend of coarse porosity and as consequence does not improve the mechanical
porosity development is the same as with pure argon shielding properties of the welds.
gas. With leading torch setup, the porosity level increases along In general, the tensile strength of welds made in pure argon
the increase of separation distance and in trailing torch setup, shielding gas is slightly higher (by 3.6%) than in argon-helium mix-
porosity levels tend to decrease along the increase of separation ture since hybrid welding in argon seems to be more stable process.
distance. However, the tensile strength has the opposite effect.
Weld with lower level of porosity (15%, 3 mm separation distance)
has lower tensile strength (95 MPa) than the weld having 20%
112 I. Bunaziv et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 233 (2016) 107–114
Fig. 6. The effect of separation distance and MIG torch direction on porosity level in fiber laser-MIG hybrid welding of AA5083 with pure argon shielding gas (100%) of
fractures workpieces parallel to the weld line.
Fig. 7. The effect of separation distance and MIG torch direction on porosity level in fiber laser-MIG hybrid welding of AA5083 with argon-helium mixture shielding gas
(50%/50%) of fractures workpieces parallel to the weld line.
3.4. Coarse porosity The possible reason of coarse porosity is schematically illus-
trated in Fig. 8. The figure demonstrates the possible closures of
It is difficult to understand the reasons of porosity since exper- keyhole during welding due to flow of liquid metal, which after
iments were not photographed with high-speed camera that can some time generates swelling. Moreover, aluminum alloys have
help to identify the true causes of porosity. Instead, it can be low surface tension and swelling created easier than, for exam-
explained theoretically at some level. ple, in welding of steel. The instability of keyhole can be achieved
I. Bunaziv et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 233 (2016) 107–114 113
Fig. 8. The possible keyhole instability phases that generate coarse porosity in trailing arc (leading laser) setup during hybrid welding, adopted from Xie (1999).
by improper welding speed and laser power. Such instabilities of in upper molten pool of weld, since laser and arc together bring
keyhole can also create other defects such as spattering or under- heat flux to it. That means more heat is accumulating in the arc
fills. Another possible reason of coarse porosity is vaporization of zone, whereas the lower part of weld experiences the heat input
magnesium during the welding process. only from the laser source since laser operates in keyhole regime.
From the study of porosity level in different shielding gases it This phenomenon affects width of the partial melted zone (PMZ)
can be concluded that adding helium to the shielding gas does not as can be seen from Fig. 10. In PMZ always contains high degree
help to reduce porosity. of impurities Moreover, it usually has high tensile residual stresses
The methods to decrease a coarse porosity in welds can be as which leads to hot cracking, high probability of containing hydro-
follows: gen which leads to hydrogen embrittlement. Consequently, it is
preferable to have as shorter width of PMZ as possible.
• Laser beam power should be balanced accurately with welding Fig. 10 illustrates the difference in width of partial melted zone
speed. Lower beam power disturbes the stability of the keyhole (PMZ) in different part weld, namely PMZ between base metal and
and when it collapses, coarse porosity is generated. Higher laser arc zone, PMZ between base metal and laser zone. It is clearly seen
intensity provides high laser-to-arc ratio, therefore de-gassing that PMZ produced by laser beam is negligibly narrow compared
effect cannot be maintained (Ola and Doern 2015). Therefore, to PMZ produced by MIG source. Such a tendency is valid for all
welding speed should be decreased or arc power increased when welded seam produced in experiments.
it is needed without destabilization of the keyhole dynamics due
to higher amount molten filler wire around it (Casalino et al.,
2014).
• Inclinationof beam incidence angle by 30◦ to the surface normal
4. Conclusions
against welding direction can reduce porosity (Katayama et al.,
2006).
In this paper, several important welding parameters were tested
• Introducing the air gap into setup can decrease the porosity, how-
on the quality of welds. Based on the current results, the following
ever the welding speed and therefore filler wire feed rate must
conclusions can be derived:
be increased and other parameters re-considered.
Fig. 9. The changes in microstructure of the same weld (a) in arc zone and (b) in laser zone.
Fig. 10. The changes in width of PMZ in weld No. 6 (Ar-He 50%/50%): (a) PMZ between fusion zone and base metal (BM) in arc zone; (b) PMZ between fusion zone and base
metal (BM) in laser zone.
Acknowledgements Katayama, S., Naito, Y., Uchiumi, S., Mizutani, M., 2006. Physical phenomena in
porosity prevention mechanism in laser-Arc hybrid welding. Trans. JWRI 35,
13–18.
The authors wish to thank the Research Council of Norway Leo, P., Renna, G., Casalino, G., Olabi, A.G., 2015. Effect of power distribution on the
for funding through the Petromaks 2 Programme, Contract weld quality during hybrid laser welding of an Al-Mg alloy. Opt. Laser Technol.
No.228513/E30. The financial support from ENI, Statoil, Lundin, 73, 118–126.
Ola, O.T., Doern, F.E., 2015. Keyhole-induced porosity in laser-arc hybrid welded
Total, JFE Steel Corporation, Posco, Kobe Steel, SSAB, Bredero Shaw, aluminum. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 80 (September (1)), 3–10, 201503/.
Borealis, Trelleborg, Nexans, Aker Solutions, FMC Kongsberg Sub- Olsen, F., 2009. Hybrid laser-arc welding. Woodhead Publishing, pp. 225–245.
sea, Marine Aluminum, Hydro and Sapa are also acknowledged. Seto, N., Katayama, S., Matsunawa, A., 2001. Porosity formation mechanism and
supressions procedure in alser welding of aluminium alloys. Weld. Int. 15 (3),
In addition, the authors would like to express the gratitude the
191–202.
staff of the Laboratory of Laser Materials Processing (Lappeenranta, Thomy C., Kohn H., and Vollertsen F., 2005. Application of high-power fibre lasers
Finland) for carrying out the experimental work in 2012. in laser and laser-MIG hybrid welding. In Paton B. E. and Kovalenko V. S. Proc.
2nd International Conference on Laser Technologies in Welding and Materials
Processing (LTWMP 05), p. 46–48.
References Wagner, F., Thomy, C., Schilf, M., Seefeld, T., Kohn, H., and Vollertsen, F., 2006. Laser
and laser hybrid welding of thick sheet aluminum and steel. In Brandt, M., and
Allen, C.M., Verharghe, G., Hilton, P.A., Heason, C.P., Prangnell, P.B., 2006. Laser and Harvey, E. Proc. 2nd Pacific International Conference on Applications of Lasers
hybrid laser-MIG welding of 6. 35 and 12. 7 mm thick aluminum aerospace and Optics PICALO 2006, p. 163-168.
alloy. Mater. Sci. Forum 519–521, 1139–1144. Xie, J., 1999. Plasma fluctuation and keyhole instability in laser welding.
Casalino, G., Campanelli, S. L., Dal Maso, U., and Ludovico, A. D., 2013. Arc leading Proceedings of the 18th International Congress on Applications of Lasers and
versus laser leading in the hybrid welding of aluminum alloy using a fiber Electro-Optics, 11–20.
laser. 8th CIRP Conference on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Yan, S., Chen, H., Zhu, Z., Gou, G., 2014a. Hybrid laser-Metal Inert Gas welding of
Engineering, p. 151-156. Al-Mg-Si alloy joints: microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater. Des.
Casalino, G., Mortello, M., Leo, P., Benyounis, K.Y., Olabi, A.G., 2014. Study on arc 61, 160–167.
and laser powers in the hybrid welding of AA5754 Al-alloy. Mater. Des. 61, Yan, S., Chen, H., Zhu, Z., Gou, G., 2014b. Characteristics of microstructure and
191–198. fatigue resistance of hybrid fiber laser-MIG welded Al-Mg alloy joints. Appl.
Surf. Sci. 298, 12–18.