www.ExerciseCertification.

com

Anthropometry: A General Introduction

· Featuring Rosscraft Innovations Instruments·
Brian D. Johnston

Introduction to Anthropometry
The intention of this paper is to provide the reader a general overview of the complexity of anthropometry, from land
marking and taking a skinfold measurement to implementing data into complex studies (e.g., somatotyping), and a look
at quality instruments and software for these purposes.

Anthropometry is the science of measuring the human body, and takes into account components of body build such as:
• Surface body measurements (muscle girth, limb lengths, and structural breadths of different aspects, height and
weight, and land marking specific sites in order to obtain many of these measurements);
• Body Composition (skin-fold evaluation for subcutaneous fat estimation); and
• Photographic evidence within a standardized environment.

The various aspects measured then could be accrued to obtain a comprehensive profile on a person, to give a description
of the body as a whole. This profile may be restricted (required measurements and land marking to enable the most
basic computations for somatotype [to be addressed in greater detail later], proportionality, relative fat, indices of body
surface area, waist-to-hip ratio, fat patterning, and skinfold-corrected girths). A full profile would require additional
measurements for computations to be made in estimates of relative body fat, calculations of skeletal mass, and
calculation of bone, muscle, adipose and residual masses using fractionation of body mass techniques. The chart on the
next page details a full profile with restricted aspects check-marked, from ISAK’s International Standards for
Anthropometric Assessment.

When profile information is used for advanced computations, we then speak of the field of kinanthropometry, which is
the scientific specialization dealing with the measurement of people in a variety of morphological perspectives. An
overview of kinanthropometry can be viewed as such:

Identification Specification Application Relevance

Kinanthropometry… Study of human… Help understand… Areas of…
Human Size Growth Health
Movement Shape Aging Education
Measurement Proportion Exercise Government
…with precision and Composition Performance Commerce
accuracy Maturation Nutrition …with respect for individual
Gross Function rights

It is obvious how complex and detailed the studies and applications of anthropometry and kinanthropometry can be.
And it should be further obvious among fitness clinicians and practitioners the role and value of acquiring regular
measured data of a human subject while undergoing a fitness regimen. Fundamentally, it is necessary to determine the
changes taking place in order to quantify the effectiveness of the fitness program relative to the individual’s goals, with
that effectiveness being reflective of his or her needs, abilities, and limitations. With regular assessment, it then can be
determined the extent of the current fitness program’s value, and what changes need occur to match the subject better.

Anthropometry and Rosscraft Innovations Instruments 1

 www.ExerciseCertification.com

For example, an initial girth measurement of 40-inches of a woman’s hips, followed by a measurement of 39-inches one
month later indicates a loss of 1-inch in circumference, and that the fitness program (both exercise and nutrition) had
that measure of value and in that particular regard. The extent of the value would depend on what was typical among
female clients, across a broad spectrum, and relative to the client’s somatotype, motivation, and whether the loss was all
adipose tissue or a combination of adipose/muscle/water. Perhaps the client could have done better than a one-inch
loss, or perhaps the client was satisfied regardless of what may be ‘ideal’ or possibly achieved.

Type of Measurement No. Site Restricted

Basic 1 Mass 9
2 Stature 9
3 Sitting height
Skinfolds 4 Triceps 9
5 Subscapular 9
6 Biceps 9
7 Iliac Crest 9
8 Supraspinale 9
9 Abdominal 9
10 Front thigh 9
11 Medial calf 9
Girths 12 Head
13 Neck
14 Arm (relaxed) 9
15 Arm(flexed and tensed) 9
16 Forearm (maximum)
17 Wrist (distal styloids)
18 Chest (mesosternale)
19 Waist (minimum) 9
20 Gluteal (hips) 9
21 Thigh (1 cm gluteal)
22 Thigh (mid-troch-tib. lat.)
23 Calf (maximum) 9
24 Ankle (minimum)
Lengths 25 Acromiale-radiale
26 Radiale-stylion
27 Midstylion-dactylion
28 Iliospinale height
29 Trochanterion height
30 Trochanterion-tibiale laterale
31 Tibiale laterale height
32 Tibiale laterale-sphyrion tibiale
Breadths 33 Biacromial
34 Biilocristal
35 Foot length
36 Transverse chest
37 A-P chest depth
38 Humerus 9
39 Femur 9

2 Anthropometry and Rosscraft Innovations Instruments

 LANDMARKS
Vertex (V)
*Suprasternale (SST)
*Mesosternale (MST)
*Thelion (TH)
Subscapulare
*Omphalion (OM)
*Acromiale (A)
*Radiale (R)
*Stylion (STY)
*Dactylion (DA)
*Iliocristale (IC)
*Iliospinale (IS)
*Trochanterion (TRO)
Patelare *Patelare (PAT) seated
*Tibiale Mediale (TM)
*Tibiale Laterale (TL)
*Sphyrion Mediale (SM)
*Subscapulare (SS)
*Pternion (PTE)
*Acropodion (AP)
 www.ExerciseCertification.com

Fundamentally, it is evident as to why we take physical measurements, whether in an attempt to improve the design of
an automobile to reduce wind resistance, or to guide us in determining the efficacy of a fitness program and its future
direction. Unfortunately, many fitness professionals underestimate the value of measurements, and even fewer uphold
quality standards in the study of anthropometry.

Consider the measuring of a triceps skinfold, whereby most fitness practitioners simply ‘eyeball’ where the skin should
be grabbed. Rather, to maintain consistency and standardization, it is necessary to landmark the superior lateral border
of the acromion process and the superior head of the radius. From there the clinician landmarks the halfway point of the
Acromiale-Radiale distance, either with a measuring tape (photo 1) or better yet, a segmometer with slider indicators
(photo 2).1

Photo 1 Photo 2

The halfway point is marked with a pencil (photo 3), a tape measure is wrapped around the arm at that mark (photo 4),
the triceps horizontal mark is plotted (photo 5),2 and a skinfold measurement then is taken at the marked midpoint (and
one centimeter down from the area pinched; photo 6).

Photo 4
Photo 3

1
Photographs and instruction courtesy of www.Rosscraft.ca
2
A horizontal mark also is plotted on the biceps brachii, for purposes of taking a skinfold measurement at that point. Furthermore,
the plotted line halfway along the acromiale-radiale distance serves as the landmark for taking both relaxed and flexed upper arm
circumference measurements, and diameter measurements if desired.

4 Anthropometry and Rosscraft Innovations Instruments

 www.ExerciseCertification.com

Photo 5 Photo 6

Such strict standardization of taking measurements and collecting data is vital, to make comparisons across time and
space in any country and with any anthropometry professional. The International Society for the Advancement of
Kinanthropmetry (ISAK) has members in 50 countries and has worked since 1986 to develop such standards, which
are presented in detail in its manual International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment (www.ISAKonline.com), a
recommended and affordable resource that any fitness professional should have in his or her arsenal.

Besides the above example of land marking and measuring the triceps brachii skinfold, here are some other standards of
excellence as espoused by ISAK, to provide the reader further consideration of the scientific precision necessary in this
discipline:
• A flexible steel tape of at least 1.5 m in length is recommended for girths. This should be calibrated in
centimeters with millimeter gradations. If fiberglass tapes are used, regular calibration against a steel tape is
required as these non-metal tapes may stretch over time.
• Skinfold calipers require a constant tension closing compression of 10 g.mm-2 throughout the range of
measurements. They should ideally be calibrated to at least 40 mm in 0.2 mm divisions.
• If possible, 2-3 measurements should be taken at each site with the mean value being used in any further
calculations if two measurements are taken, and the median value used if three measurements are taken. Sites
should be measured in succession to avoid experimenter bias. That is, a complete set is obtained before
repeating the measurements for the second and then third time.
• The most stable values are those obtained routinely in the morning twelve hours after food and after voiding.
Since it is not always possible to standardize the measurement time, it is important to record the time of day
when measurements are made. Generally, subjects are taller in the morning and shorter in the evening. A loss
of about 1% in stature is common over the course of the day.
• When taking a skinfold measurement, the nearest edge of the contact faces of the caliper are applied 1 cm
away from the edge of the thumb and finger. If the caliper is placed too deep or too shallow incorrect values
may be recorded. As a guide, the caliper should be placed at a depth of approximately mid-fingernail.
Measurement is recorded two seconds after the full pressure of the caliper is applied. Skinfold sites should be
measured in succession to avoid experimenter bias. That is, a complete data set is obtained before repeating
the measurements for the second and then third time. This may also help to reduce the effects of skinfold
compressibility.

Anthropometry and Rosscraft Innovations Instruments 5

 www.ExerciseCertification.com

• When measuring girths, constant tension is achieved by ensuring that there is no indentation of the skin, yet the
tape holds its place at the designated landmark. While constant-tension tapes may be available, non-tension
tapes are preferred since they allow the anthropometrist to control the tension. When reading the tape the
measurer’s eyes must be at the same level as the tape to avoid any error of parallax.
• When measuring the flexed and tensed arm girth, the anthropometrist measures at the level of the peak of the
contracted biceps. If there is no obvious peak of the biceps, this girth should be measured at the level of the
mid-acromiale-radiale landmark (see the photos presented on the preceding page).

ISAK Anthropometric Assessment Standards manual available at www.ISAKonline.com

6 Anthropometry and Rosscraft Innovations Instruments

 www.ExerciseCertification.com

Somatotyping
In this section we will look at one sophisticated application for anthropometric data: Somatotyping. Most fitness
professionals and clinicians are aware of this categorization of the human body, as it relates to a person’s fatness,
muscularity and thinness. Consequence, it likely is the most relevant area of interest to the fitness audience when
addressing advanced anthropometry.

History of Somatotyping
In 1940, William H. Sheldon, S.S. Stevens and W.B. Tucker published the book The Varieties of Human Physique,
whereby they described and coined the term "somatotype" and the three categories: “endomorphy,” “mesomorphy” and
“ectomorphy.”3 Sheldon published other books on the subject, but a foundation was established in which the
components were rated on 7-point scales,4 derived from embryonic layers and that a person’s somatotype was a
permanent morphogenotype. Sheldon's direction for the three components of physique to be rated on scales from 1-7
was both unique and allowed for more defined categorization of physiques into a wide variety of possible somatotypes
beyond the few categories then used. The three-number rating provided for a wide variety of possible somatotypes, yet
there remained persistent criticisms from biologists who believed that a person’s somatotype was a morphophenotype -
something that could change.

Since then somatotyping has improved in its science, to the point of providing medical direction. For instance, one
study concluded: “It is possible to differentiate healthy adolescent subjects, patients with nonprogressive adolescent
idiopathic scoliosis, and patients with progressive idiopathic scoliosis by using anthropometric measurements and
morphologic classification. These findings may be useful in the early detection of children at risk for progression of
scoliosis and may allow earlier application of treatment methods without waiting for a significant increase in the
curve.”5 The most commonly used method of somatotyping today is the Heath-Carter method6, which may implement
various measurements (anthropometric method), standardized photographs (photoscopic method) or a combination of
the two. The use of photographs is uncommon since it takes far greater practice to distinguish the many somatotype
categories. For the anthropometric method, I recommend the reader download The Heath-Carter Anthropometric
Somatotype Instruction Manual at www.somatotype.org.

The information found in that manual is very useful, with some of its content integrated into this part of the report.
However, unless one has the time to apply the extensive mathematical formulae, and to plot results on a graph, the
practice can be tedious.

Fortunately, the makers of the Somatotype Calculation and Analysis software, at www.SweatTechnologies,com
performs all the hard work for the fitness clinician. After a few minutes of acquiring the necessary data (background
information, skinfold measurements, joint diameter measurements, etc.), very pertinent and useful information is
provided the clinician that supports body fat percentage and general physical structure, which then can be tracked over
time and even related to similar or dissimilar individuals for comparative purposes.

3
Based on photoscopic ratings and various indices derived from the photos of 4,000 college men. Another book served as a
reference work for somatotyping men, Atlas of Men, but a companion Atlas for Women was never published.
4
Hence, a somatotype is a numerical descriptor of overall physique in terms of body shape and composition, and is independent of
age, size or gender. The numbers tell the observer about the relative adiposity (endomorphy), musculo-skeletal robustness
(mesomorphy), and linearity (ectomorphy) of the physique. (from Anthropometry Illustrated, William Ross, et. al.).
5
LeBlanc, R., Labelle, H., Forest, F., and Poitras, B. Morphologic Discrimination Among Healthy Subjects and Patients With
Progressive and Nonprogressive Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine. 23(10):1109-1115, May 15, 1998.
6
Carter, J.E.L. & Heath, B.H. (1990) Somatotyping: Development and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.

Anthropometry and Rosscraft Innovations Instruments 7

 www.ExerciseCertification.com

Somatotype and Metabolic Rate

Improvement of physical fitness and various systems of the human organism varies. Individual energy expenditure, for
example, has a bearing on individual body composition, wherein some people expend many calories while others
expend few calories, even when undertaking extensive exercise. The extent to which a person expends calories is due
to:
• Basal metabolic rate (BMR), which refers to the metabolic rate as measured under basal conditions, i.e., 12
hours after eating, after a restful sleep, no exercise or activity preceding the test, elimination of emotional
excitement, and in a comfortable temperature. BMR is affected partly by, and increases as a result of, fat-free
mass; these factors decrease with age, from infancy through adolescence and into adulthood, and are
influenced further by sex with resting rates lower in women than in men. It should be noted that BMR testing
is conducted no longer because of more accurate thyroid function tests, but a metabolic rate at rest (now termed
resting metabolic rate [RMR]) still exists with each individual.
• Thermic effect of food. This refers to the integrated increase in energy expenditure after food ingestion over
the energy expended at rest before the meal. Some foods require more calories for digestion. Also,
requirements for specific nutrients “at the time” result in more efficient metabolism, such as carbohydrate
intake immediately after exercise, when muscles are insulin resistant and more permeable.
• Energy requirements of specific activities.
• Growth, through maturation or muscle building.

It is important to realize that two individuals of the same sex and age can have the same body composition, including
the same amount of fat free mass, yet they can have different RMRs and experience different thermic effects of food.
These variances in metabolic expenditure are associated with genetic factors unique to the individual. Similarly, two
individuals can have the same arm size and biceps brachii mass, but lift different weights because of other genetic
factors.

Patterns in RMRs, thermic effects, energy requirements and growth potential can be determined through observation.
Alterations in diet and exercise can then be made based on the collected data of individual characteristics.

Another influence of metabolic rate is that of somatotype. As stated, there are three main categories of somatotypes,
being endomorph, mesomorph, and ectomorph (refer to the diagrams on the following page). Establishing a somatotype
classification for an individual creates a ballpark representation to help determine exercise and nutrition protocol
prescription, as explained under each category next page. However, somatotyping should be viewed merely as one
aspect of individualism.

NOTE: RMR differences among active and inactive women do not show much variation. The opposite is true of men.
There are two reasons for this. First, men carry much more muscle tissue and are apt to increase lean muscle mass
dramatically, as opposed to women; this greatly alters RMR. Second, women are more apt to maintain body fat stores
because of estrogen levels and as a means for survival – necessary for motherhood and pregnancy – thus keeping
metabolism regulated within normal values regardless of the circumstances. Hence, trainability expectations must be
relative to what is possible based on sex. Greater change, as a result of exercise and proper nutrition will be more
noticeable and marked in males than in females on the average. As a result, women who tend to be fat, even if not
eating much, have low lean muscle mass and an inability to gain much muscle mass. This person would have a
predominance of endomorphy, and with less ectomorphy and mesomorphy respectively. This body-type combination
results in a slow metabolism, necessitating higher volume and lower intensity of training than what may be appropriate
for other women of a different body type.

8 Anthropometry and Rosscraft Innovations Instruments

 www.ExerciseCertification.com

Somatotype Categories7 and Exercise & Nutrition Directions

Endomorph
Endomorphs are those with a body build marked by predominance of tissues derived from the endoderm. The
endoderm is the innermost of the three primary germ layers of a developing embryo that gives rise to the epithelium of
the digestive tract and its associated glands, the respiratory organs, bladder, vagina, and urethra. Endomorphs are large
framed, heavy-set individuals with relatively low metabolic rates who find it extremely difficult to lose adipose tissue.
They require fewer calories to maintain lean tissue and have a need for more rest days since the breakdown and
rebuilding of muscle tissue does not occur as readily as for the other two somatotypes. True endomorphs consume few
calories and should not be mistaken with those who over consume. Because calorie intake generally is low for this
group, it is vital that endomorphs consume quality calories from relatively low-fat sources for muscle repair and growth
to occur, but without increasing fat stores further.

A predominant endomorph is characterized with a round face, short, thick neck, deep, thick chest relative to width, thick
legs and buttocks, and a stomach that may protrude more than the chest. Body mass is centered in the lower abdomen
and hip region, having a pear-shaped appearance. The predominant endomorph finds it difficult to sustain endurance
activity as a result of oxygen consumption per pound of body weight.

Mesomorph
Mesomorph refers to a body build characterized by predominance of tissues derived from the mesoderm. The
mesoderm is a primary germ layer of the embryo, lying between the ectoderm and endoderm. From it arises all
connective tissues; muscular, skeletal, circulatory, lymphatic, and urogenital systems; and the linings of the body
cavities.

This body type often is referred to as “well proportioned” both because of its appearance and because its structure is
neither thin nor fat. Mesomorphs are average to large framed individuals with normal metabolisms. They can appear
rugged naturally, and perhaps stocky even without exercise. The predominant mesomorph has well-defined muscles,
broad thick chests, sloping shoulders, flat abdomen, and usually v-shaped.

Predominant mesomorphs have no trouble with body weight fluctuations and are stronger and more robust than
ectomorphs or endomorphs, and their oxygen consumption per pound of body weight measures somewhere between the
endo and ecto somatotypes. They have higher body fat stores and require fewer calories to maintain muscle mass than
predominant ectomorphs. Since predominant mesomorphs have a high ratio of fast twitch fibers, these people require
more rest days between workouts and modest levels of volume and frequency (although the superior genetics of
mesomorphs often allow them to produce results on higher volume routines more suitable for ectomorphs). Successful
bodybuilders, powerlifters, and Olympic weight lifters frequently have a high inclination toward mesomorphy.

Ectomorph
A predominant ectomorph is a person with a body build marked by tissues derived from the ectoderm. The ectoderm is
the outer layer of cells in the developing embryo; it produces skin structures, the teeth and glands of the mouth, the
nervous system, organs of special sense, part of the pituitary gland, and the pineal and suprarenal glands.

Ectomorphs are small framed, low fat individuals who find it extremely difficult to gain weight. Other characteristics
include a thin bony face, fairly undefined musculature, long thin trunk with a flat (and even sunken) chest, slender arms,
narrow hips, and small joints.

7
Somatotype descriptions obtained in part from Taber’s Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary, 18th Edition. Clayton L. Thomas, M.D.,
M.P.H. (ed). F.A. Davis Company. 1993.

Anthropometry and Rosscraft Innovations Instruments 9

 www.ExerciseCertification.com

They have fast metabolisms and usually low amounts of fast twitch fibers throughout their bodies. Both factors allow
for quick recovery after workouts and a need for greater volume and frequency than the other somatotypes. Although
ectomorphs require fewer rest days after workouts, their bodies do necessitate the need for a large volume of kcal to
help sustain and gain muscle tissue. If sufficient quality kcal are not ingested, ectomorph systems catabolize muscle
tissue for recovery energy. The predominant ectomorph has an exercise advantage in terms of oxygen consumption per
pound of body weight, and is suited best for endurance-based activities.

Generally, during childhood, there is a predominance of ectomorphy (much of the obesity we see in Western children is
forced endomorphy via overeating and lack of activity, which are not their bodies’ natural state). During the teen years
there is a natural inclination toward mesomorphy in boys and endomorphy in girls. As boys mature there is a more
noticeable splitting among endomorphy, mesomorphy, and ectomorphy whereas females typically do not experience
such divergence (at least not to the same extent). Most important, the measure and character of each somatotype within
each individual vary across a broad spectrum throughout the population and will change relative to the organism’s
genetics as influenced by his or her environment, e.g., exercise and nutritional habits.

Somatotype Rating
Somatotype categorization is the appraised phenotypical rating or qualification of the body’s geometrical size-
dissociation… of shape and composition. It is expressed in a three-number rating system that represents the general
‘types’ of endomorphy, mesomorphy and ectomorphy, and always in that order.

A rating of 5-8-2, for example, would give a magnitude of an individual’s somatotype and would suggest a very high
inclination toward mesomorphy (8), a moderately high rate of endormorphy (5) with little ectomorphy (2)
characteristics. A rating of ½ to 2½ is considered low, 3-5 is moderate, 5½-7 is high, and 7½ and above are very high.8

8
Carter, J.E.L. & Heath, B.H. (1990) Somatotyping: Development and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.

10 Anthropometry and Rosscraft Innovations Instruments

 www.ExerciseCertification.com

The 13 categories are based on the areas of the 2-D somatochart (chart shown on page x)9:

1. Central: no component differs by more than one unit from the other two.

2. Balanced endomorph: endomorphy is dominant and mesomorphy and ectomorphy are equal (or do not differ
by more than one-half unit).

3. Mesomorphic endomorph: endomorphy is dominant and mesomorphy is greater than ectomorphy.

4. Mesomorph-endomorph: endomorphy and mesomorphy are equal (or do not differ by more than one-half unit),
and ectomorphy is smaller.

5. Endomorphic mesomorph: mesomorphy is dominant and endomorphy is greater than ectomorophy.

6. Balanced mesomorph: mesomorphy is dominant and endomorphy and ectomorphy are equal (or do not differ
by more than one-half unit).

7. Ectomorphic mesomorph: mesomorphy is dominant and ectomorphy is greater than endomorphy.

8. Mesomorph-ectomorph: mesomorphy and ectomorphy are equal (or do not differ by more than one-half unit),
and endmorphy is smaller.

9. Mesomorphic ectomorph: ectomorphy is dominant and mesmorphy is greater than endomorphy.

10. Balanced ectomorph: ectomorphy is dominant and endomorphy and mesomorphy are equal (or do not differ by
more than one-half unit).

11. Endomorphic ectomorph: ectomorphy is dominant and endomorphy is greater than mesomorphy.

12. Endomorph-ectomorph: endomorphy and ectomorphy are equal (or do not differ by more than one-half unit),
and mesomorphy is lower.

13. Ectomorphic endomorph: endomorphy is dominant and ectomorphy is greater than mesomorphy.

The thirteen categories can be simplified (and often is done) into four larger categories:

1. Central: no component differs by more than one unit from the other two.

2. Endomorph: endomorphy is dominant, mesomorphy and ectomorphy are more than one-half unit lower.

3. Mesomorph: mesomorphy is dominant, endomorphy and ectomorphy are more than one-half unit lower.

4. Ectomorph: ectomorphy is dominant, endomorphy and mesomorphy are more than one-half unit lower.

9
Carter and Heath

Anthropometry and Rosscraft Innovations Instruments 11

 www.ExerciseCertification.com

Plotting a Somatotype
Somatotypes with similar relationships between the dominance of components are grouped into categories named to
reflect those relationships. The two-dimensional graph10 below shows somatotype categories across X and Y
coordinates, whereby the numbers on the chart suggest the three-number rating system. For instance, over to the far
bottom left is the number 931. This would indicate a rating of endomorphic (9), mesomorphic (3), and ectomorphic (1).
In effect, a person who has a high predominance of endomorphy, some mesomorphic qualities, but very little
ectomorphy would be a mesomorphic endomorph. The general plan for plotting can be seen, by following the
somatotypes along each axis (endo, meso and ecto), starting at the one rating and moving along to the higher numbers
on each axis, and that the other two components change as you move along the lines. And although the graph is
represented in two-dimensions, it must be remembered that somatotypes exist in three dimensions.

Let us return to the Somatotype Calculation and Analysis software, by Sweat Technologies. The following three pages
consists of one report (of four possible types) of Matt Brzycki, a ‘balanced mesomorph,’ internationally recognized
author and strength and conditioning expert and former competitive powerlifter. Moreover, Matt is compared to several
of the male Olympic weightlifters at the 1976 Montreal Olympic games. The blue circle on the graph shows the mean
of all individuals, whereas the solid blue dot depicts Matt’s location on the somatoplot.

10
Courtesy of Lindsay Carter, from the book Somatotyping: Development and Applications.

12 Anthropometry and Rosscraft Innovations Instruments

Compare a profile to its document
Report Explanation

This report compares a single profile (the Comparison Profile) to all other profiles in a
Somatotype document. It includes
• a Somatochart showing all the profiles from each of the documents (Note: if you
have chosen "plot means only" in the Report Wizard, only the mean somatotypes for
each of the groups will be shown);
• a Comparison of Variables Table with statistics for the Comparison Profile relative
to the group.

On the Somatochart, the Comparison Profile is indicated by a black dot. The mean
somatotype for all the profiles in the document is shown by the profile marker inside
an empty circle. Below the Somatochart is a brief description of the Somatotype
document.

The Comparison of Variables Table shows the Comparison Profile value, and the
median, mean and SD for all profiles in the document for a range of variables. Also
shown is the percentile rank of the Comparison Profile relative to all the profiles in
the document. The Comparison Profile is compared to all profiles for the following
variables:
• somatotype components (endomorphy, mesomorphy, ectomorphy);
• SAD (Somatotype Attitudinal Distance), the three-dimensional distance from a
profile to the mean of all profiles;
• HWR (height-weight ratio), calculated as height in cm divided by mass in kg raised to
the power 1/3, ie HWR = Height/(Mass)^1/3;
• age, and
• the ten anthropometric variables required to calculate somatotype: height and
mass; triceps, subscapular, supraspinale and calf skinfolds; flexed arm and calf
girth; biepicondylar humerus and femur breadth.

1 - SOMATOTYPE REPORT: Compare a profile to its document

Somatoplot

191

391 181

591 381 171

581 371 272 173

991 781 571 361 262 163

981 771 561 462 363 153

971 761 551 452 353 254 155

961 751 541 442 343 244 145

951 741 642 543 444 345 135

941 731 632 533 434 335 236 137

931 721 622 523 424 325 226 127

921 711 612 513 414 315 216 117 129

911 812 713 614 515 416 317 218 119

Subject: Matt Brzycki

Soma Document: Matt Brzycki
Mean profile of document:

2 - SOMATOTYPE REPORT: Compare a profile to its document

Profile To Document Comparison
Subject: Matt Brzycki
Somatotype Document: Matt Brzycki

Comparison of Variables Table

Variable Profile Median Mean SD Percentile Rank
Endomorphy 1.8 2.15 2.39 1.06 29.2%
Mesomorphy 4.4 7.80 7.49 1.61 4.2%
Ectomorphy 2 0.45 0.78 0.76 87.5%
SAD 3.37 1.22 1.65 1.15 87.5%
HWR 41.81 39.06 39.17 1.96 87.5%
Age 47.94 29.25 29.98 6.53 95.8%
Height 179.7 173.50 171.30 9.47 87.5%
Mass 79.38 81.14 86.27 24.68 45.8%
Triceps SF 3 6.20 7.37 3.36 4.2%
Subscapular SF 12 10.00 10.72 4.01 70.8%
Supraspinale SF 4 5.45 6.38 3.22 12.5%
Calf SF 10 6.20 6.99 3.10 79.2%
Arm Girth 37 37.90 38.50 5.36 45.8%
Calf Girth 38.86 39.80 39.36 3.92 29.2%
Humerus B 6.35 7.35 7.27 0.66 12.5%
Femur B 8.38 9.88 9.77 0.68 4.2%

3 - SOMATOTYPE REPORT: Compare a profile to its document

 www.ExerciseCertification.com

Rosscraft Innovation Instruments

Thus far a general overview of anthropometry was provided, together with an example of precision standards in
landmarking and taking a triceps skinfold, and how measurements integrate into the more complex field of study of
somatotyping. The next important issue to this paper is the quality of instruments used to acquire data, which
instruments must be reliable, i.e., reproducible and accurate.
A standard anthropometry kit would include a stadiometer or height scale and headboard (unless the weighing scale has
a built-in height rod), a weighing scale, a small sliding caliper for biepicondylar breadth measurements of the humerus
and femur (elbow and knee joints), a flexible steel or fiberglass tape measure, skinfold calipers, and anthropometer (a
device for measuring the human body and its parts).
Statures/heights and girths are to be recorded to the nearest mm, biepicondylar diameters to the nearest 0.5 mm, and
skinfolds to the nearest 0.1 mm (Harpenden caliper) or 0.5 mm on other calipers.11
The I.A.R.T.’s testing and performance center, Fitness Logistics, implements the Rosscraft Innovations Centurion Kit.
Rosscraft Innovations instruments are of the highest caliber, and have been designed to ISAK standards for gathering
anthropometric data, for general measurement comparison, as well as somatotyping as presented in the previous section.
The Centurion Kit includes the following items and features.

The Campbell 2012 (54 cm wide) double-sliding patent designed,

non-binding caliper with AP branches can be calibrated and provides
a reading to the nearest 0.01 cm; a reading to the nearest 0.1 cm, is
sufficient for most scientific and clinical applications. Based on a
design by Robert Campbell, the Campbell 20 calipers’ straight
branches are used to measure torso breadths such as biacromial,
transverse chest, and biiliocristal (see top photo right). AP Chest, and
some head measurements are made using the AP Extensions or
Branch Pointers (see bottom photo right), which pointers are exactly
10 cm each (and can be calibrated using an adjustable screw and lock
nut). Thus, the caliper reading from AP branch tips is 20 cm too large,
easily corrected by subtracting 20 cm constant in the data entry
program or spread sheet.

These calipers have other uses for fitness clinicians, such as

measuring and tracking the changes made in shoulder, waist, and hip
widths at their widest points, to be coordinated with girth
measurements of the same parts.

These calipers are machined from aluminum, with a satin black Rosscraft Innovations Campbell 20 Wide Sliding
anodized finish and a contrasting white laser engraved scale. The Torso Caliper (top) with AP branches (bottom)
Campbell Caliper 20 replaces the traditional anthropometer and
widespreading caliper for breadths, AP chest depth and other
diameters. A serif zero indicator provides for reading to 0.1 cm with
interpolation to 0.05 cm.

11
The Heath-Carter Anthropometric Somatotype Instructional Manual.
12
The Rosscraft Innovations line of Campbell calipers are named after the late Mr. Robert Campbell, the inventor of the double
siding branch principle, an exclusive Rosscraft Innovations design feature under US patent No. 4265021. The Campbell 20 is the
only caliper that has long branches that do not bind under pressure at the tips.

16 Anthropometry and Rosscraft Innovations Instruments

 www.ExerciseCertification.com

Also based on a patented design by Mr. Robert Campbell, the

Campbell 10 (18 cm) double sliding small bone caliper can be
calibrated and provides a reading to the nearest 0.01 cm.
Standards dictate that the caliper branches must extend to 10
cm,13 whereas Rosscraft Innovations calipers extend to 18 cm.
The Campbell 10 Caliper assures parallel measuring faces and
does not bind while applying firm pressure.

The caliper is machined from aluminum, and has a satin black

anodized finish with a contrasting white laser engraved scale.
Double serif zero indicators provide for upper or lower scale
orientation. Reading is made to 0.1 cm with interpolation to
0.05 cm.
Campbell 10 small bone caliper

Industry standards recommend that skinfold calipers have

an upscale interjaw pressure of 10 gm/mm2 over the full
range of the openings.14 Although Lange and Lafayette
calipers are considered ‘standard’ among fitness
professionals, they tend to produce higher readings than
other calipers.15 Rather, recommended by industry
standards16,17 are the Harpenden and Slim Guide Calipers
available through Rosscraft Innovations, the latter of
which are part of the Centurion Kit.

The Slim Guide skinfold caliper, with a similar dynamic

action to calipers costing over ten times as much, is an
inexpensive alternative to the Harpenden caliper. The
Slim Guide Skinfold Caliper
Slim Guide yields approximately similar results and its and Harpenden Skinfold Caliper
rugged ABS plastic construction, with high quality
springs, guarantees a long life of usage.

In the hands of a trained anthropometrist, industry standard recommended skinfold calipers have a technical error of
measurement for a single replication as low as 5%, depending on training and technique (and accuracy may be
interpolated to 0.5 mm). The scale of 0 to 85 mm of the Slim Guide is especially useful in assessing skinfolds at the
upper ranges that are not accommodated by most other calipers and when working with the obese.

13
Schmidt, P.K. & Carter, J.E.L. (1990). Static and dynamic differences among five types of skinfold calipers. Human Biology, 62,
369-388.
14
Standard weights should be an investment for the calibration of weighing scales. Likewise, smaller standard weights are necessary
for the calibration of skinfold calipers, accomplished by fixing the instrument in a vice and suspending weights from the lower jaw.
The caliper should be adjusted so that the jaws remain open in any position when the appropriate calibration weight is used (e.g. 10 g
mm-2 surface area of a pressure plate).
15
Schmidt, P.K. & Carter, J.E.L. (1990). Static and dynamic differences among five types of skinfold calipers. Human Biology, 62,
369-388.
16
Schmidt & Carter.
17
The Heath-Carter Anthropometric Somatotype Instructional Manual.

Anthropometry and Rosscraft Innovations Instruments 17

 www.ExerciseCertification.com

The Rosscraft Innovations Centurion Kit includes two

easy-to-read Anthropometric Tapes18, 6 mm wide,
one steel and one fiberglass in two-meter lengths,
calibrated in centimeter and millimeter gradations.
Both tapes are flexible with 8 cm end tabs/stubs
before the zero marking for easier manipulation. The
aluminum model has a filed notch and patch zero
indicator to provide a better reading interface than a
single zero line since the interface has no area. The
notch helps orient the tape and align on the interface.

Rosscraft Innovations tapes are enclosed in a metal

case with a spring for automatric retraction, although
the tension is not so great as to cause compression of
Proper measuring technique using the the skin.
Rosscraft Innovations Anthropometric Tape

Recommended are flexible steel tape measures since other materials stretch or expand with use and depending on
environmental conditions, such as humidity; other tapes should be compared to steel tapes to ensure accurate readings.
In fact, it was discovered that in evaluating tapes for the Canada Fitness Survey19 two supposedly reputable brands were
incorrectly calibrated and one appeared to be stretchable.

The Rosscraft Innovations Headsquare is a portable, practical

alternative to a stadiometer for measuring stature and sitting height.
The headsquare consists of a horizontal plane and a triangle, as shown
in the photo below.

Techniques for orientation of the head, in the Frankfort Plane,

marking heights and measurement are described fully in the ISAK
standards manual and various publications including the
Anthropometry Fundamentals CD that comes with the Centurion
Kit, and Anthropometry Illustrated.

Rosscraft Innovations Headsquare

18
Technical note: in the preferred technique, the tape is always held in right hand by digits 4 and 5; digits 1 and 2 are the snubbers;
digit 3 for pinning, leveling or and adjusting tape perpendicular to the long axis.
19
Ross, Carr, and Carter. Athropometry Illustrated. www.rosscraft.ca

18 Anthropometry and Rosscraft Innovations Instruments

 www.ExerciseCertification.com

The Rosscraft Innovations Segmometer 4 is required for

direct measures of segmental lengths and projected heights
from a measuring box (a less expensive, yet just as
accurate alternative to the anthropometer). Its design
evolved from a prototype retractable carpenter or
engineer’s tape for use in Nigeria by Dr. Linda Blade.
Rosscraft Innovations discovered that even the crude
prototype was as good or better than the classical
anthropometer for obtaining projected heights and direct
segmental lengths. The Rosscraft Innovations models
dispense with the housing using only a 105-cm flexible
tape (that remains rigid throughout its length) so that it
could be easily folded and transported in the Centurion
Rosscraft Innovations Segmometer 4
case.

Its precision-machined base and slider indicators easily replicate measures, and have become a new standard for
precision. The Segmometer 4 provides added value over and above regular tapes for measuring segments lengths, as
the slider indicators make it easy to landmark and measure, particularly for a sole clinician who needs to hold both ends
of the implement.

An option (not found in the Centurion Kit) is the Rosscraft

Innovations portable AnD Weight Scale, a true strain
gauge digital scale that can be set for kilograms or pounds,
and for any latitude and altitude. It has a zero feature that
permits infant weighing in a mother's arms, and it has
several electronic memory functions.

A second option provided by Rosscraft Innovations is the

Grip Strength Tester (smedley III, analog, kg, with
case).

The Rosscraft Innovations Centurion Kit

www.Rosscraft.ca

Anthropometry and Rosscraft Innovations Instruments 19