Frequencies

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

[DataSet1] C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\RBM Dataset Clea

Statistics
Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM
N
 Q2.1_EverImplemente

Valid

Descriptives

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Desc

Q2.4_Motive_Accountability
Q2.4_Motive_DecisionMaking

Q2.4_Motive_ResourceAllocation

Q2.4_MotiveDemonstrateImpactFunders

Q2.4_MotiveCovidResponse

Q2.4_Other
Valid N (listwise)
Factor Analysis

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources
 Communalities

Q2.4_Motive_Accountability
Q2.4_Motive_DecisionMaking

Q2.4_Motive_ResourceAllocation

Q2.4_MotiveDemonstrateImpactFunders

Q2.4_MotiveCovidResponse

Extraction Method: Principal Axis Factoring.

Factor
1
2
3
4
5
Extraction Method: Principal Axis Factoring.

Factor Matrixa

Q2.4_Motive_Accountability
Q2.4_Motive_DecisionMaking

Q2.4_Motive_ResourceAllocation
Q2.4_MotiveDemonstrateImpactFunders

Q2.4_MotiveCovidResponse

Extraction Method: Principal Axis Factoring.

a. Attempted to extract 2 factors. More than 25 iterations required. (Convergence=.008). Extraction was ter

Rotated Factor Matrixa

Q2.4_Motive_Accountability
Q2.4_Motive_DecisionMaking

Q2.4_Motive_ResourceAllocation

Q2.4_MotiveDemonstrateImpactFunders

Q2.4_MotiveCovidResponse

Extraction Method: Principal Axis Factoring.

Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.

a. Rotation converged in 3 iterations.

Factor Transformation Matrix

Factor
1
2
Extraction Method: Principal Axis Factoring.
Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.

Reliability

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Scale: ALPHA

Case Processing Summary

Cases

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha
0.684
 Item Statistics

Q2.4_Motive_Accountability
Q2.4_Motive_DecisionMaking

Q2.4_Motive_ResourceAllocation

Q2.4_MotiveDemonstrateImpactFunders

Q2.4_MotiveCovidResponse

Item-Total Statistics

Q2.4_Motive_Accountability
Q2.4_Motive_DecisionMaking

Q2.4_Motive_ResourceAllocation

Q2.4_MotiveDemonstrateImpactFunders

Q2.4_MotiveCovidResponse

Scale Statistics
Mean
21.0606
Descriptives

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Desc
Primary motivations of NPOs for adopting RBM

Valid N (listwise)

Frequencies

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Statistics
Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated)
N

Extent of RBM principles integration

Valid

Means

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Case Processi

Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated) * Primary

motivations of NPOs for adopting RBM

Report
Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated)

Primary motivations of NPOs for adopting RBM

2.60
3.20
3.60
4.00
4.20
4.40
4.80
5.00
Total

Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated) * Primary

motivations of NPOs for adopting RBM

Measures of Association

Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated) * Primary

motivations of NPOs for adopting RBM

Crosstabs

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input
Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Case Processi
Primary motivations of NPOs for adopting RBM * Extent of RBM
principles integration (1=Fully Integrated)

Primary motivations of NPOs for adopting RBM * Exten

Primary motivations of NPOs for adopting RBM

Total

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases
a. 8 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .64.

Frequencies
 Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Statistics
Use specific KPIs for outcome measurement (1=Yes)
N
 Use specific KPIs for outcome measuremen

.00
1.00
Total

Crosstabs

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Case Processi

Primary motivations of NPOs for adopting RBM * Use specific KPIs for
outcome measurement (1=Yes)

Primary motivations of NPOs for adopting RBM * Us

Primary motivations of NPOs for adopting RBM

Total

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases
a. 6 cells (37.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.59.

Crosstabs

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input
Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Case Processi

Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated) * Use specific

KPIs for outcome measurement (1=Yes)

Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated)

Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated)

Total

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.71.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Correlations

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input
Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Correlations

Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated)

Use specific KPIs for outcome measurement (1=Yes)

Use specific KPIs for outcome measurement (1=Yes)

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Descriptives

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Desc

Q5.1_ChallengesLackResources

Q5.1_ChallengesDataCollection

Q5.1_ChallengesResistanceToChange

Q5.1_ChallengesStaffCapacity

Q5.1_ChallengesAdaptationtoCircumastances

Valid N (listwise)
Factor Analysis

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources
Resources

Communalities

Q5.1_ChallengesLackResources

Q5.1_ChallengesDataCollection

Q5.1_ChallengesResistanceToChange

Q5.1_ChallengesStaffCapacity

Q5.1_ChallengesAdaptationtoCircumastances

Extraction Method: Principal Axis Factoring.

Total Variance Explained

Factor
1
2
3
4
5
Extraction Method: Principal Axis Factoring.

Factor Matrixa
a. Attempted to extract 2 factors. In iteration 25, the communality of a
variable exceeded 1.0. Extraction was terminated.

Reliability

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Scale: ALPHA

Case Processing Summary

Cases

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha
0.816
 Item Statistics

Q5.1_ChallengesLackResources

Q5.1_ChallengesDataCollection

Q5.1_ChallengesResistanceToChange

Q5.1_ChallengesStaffCapacity

Q5.1_ChallengesAdaptationtoCircumastances

Item-Total Statistics

Q5.1_ChallengesLackResources

Q5.1_ChallengesDataCollection

Q5.1_ChallengesResistanceToChange

Q5.1_ChallengesStaffCapacity
Q5.1_ChallengesAdaptationtoCircumastances

Scale Statistics
Mean
18.8409

Descriptives

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Desc

Main challenges NPOs encountered during the implementation of

RBM

Valid N (listwise)

Crosstabs

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input
Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Case Processi

Main challenges NPOs encountered during the implementation of

RBM * Use specific KPIs for outcome measurement (1=Yes)

Main challenges NPOs encountered during the implementation of

Main challenges NPOs encountered during the implementation of
RBM

Total

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases
a. 11 cells (45.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.59.

Correlations

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Correlations
Main challenges NPOs encountered during the implementation of
RBM

Use specific KPIs for outcome measurement (1=Yes)

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Crosstabs

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Case Processi

Main challenges NPOs encountered during the implementation of

RBM * Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated)

Main challenges NPOs encountered during the implementation of RB

Main challenges NPOs encountered during the implementation of
RBM

Total

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases
a. 12 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .64.

Correlations

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Correlations
Main challenges NPOs encountered during the implementation of
RBM

Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated)

Frequencies

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Statistics
Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM
implementation (1=Yes)
N

Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RB

.00
1.00
Total

Correlations

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input
Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Correlations

Main challenges NPOs encountered during the implementation of

RBM
Main challenges NPOs encountered during the implementation of
RBM

Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM

implementation (1=Yes)

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Correlations

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Correlations

Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM

implementation (1=Yes)

Use specific KPIs for outcome measurement (1=Yes)

Correlations

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input
Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Correlations

Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM

implementation (1=Yes)
Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM
implementation (1=Yes)

Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated)

Crosstabs

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Case Processi

Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM

implementation (1=Yes) * Extent of RBM principles integration
(1=Fully Integrated)

Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM implementation (1=Yes) * E

Crosstabulation

Count

Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM

implementation (1=Yes)
Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM
implementation (1=Yes)

Total

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.23.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Crosstabs

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input
Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Case Processi
Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM
implementation (1=Yes) * Extent of RBM principles integration
(1=Fully Integrated)

Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM implementat

Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM

implementation (1=Yes)

Total

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.23.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Crosstabs
 Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources
Resources

Case Processi

Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM

implementation (1=Yes) * Use specific KPIs for outcome measurement
(1=Yes)

Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM implemen

Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM

implementation (1=Yes)

Total

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.57.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Crosstabs

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Case Processi

Use specific KPIs for outcome measurement (1=Yes) * Organization

achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM implementation
(1=Yes)

Use specific KPIs for outcome measurement (1=Yes) * Organization achieved measurabl
Crosstabulation

Count
Use specific KPIs for outcome measurement (1=Yes)

Total

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.57.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Crosstabs

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources
 Case Processi

Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated) *

Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM
implementation (1=Yes)

Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated) * Organization achieved measur

Crosstabulation

Count

Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated)

Total

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.23.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Oneway

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

ANOVA
Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM
implementation (1=Yes)
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total

ANOVA Effect Sizesa,b

Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM

implementation (1=Yes)

a. Eta-squared and Epsilon-squared are estimated based on the fixed-effect model.

b. Negative but less biased estimates are retained, not rounded to zero.

Oneway

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input
Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

ANOVA
Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM
implementation (1=Yes)

Between Groups
Within Groups
Total

ANOVA Effect Sizesa,b

Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM

implementation (1=Yes)

a. Eta-squared and Epsilon-squared are estimated based on the fixed-effect model.

b. Negative but less biased estimates are retained, not rounded to zero.

Oneway

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources
 ANOVA
Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM
implementation (1=Yes)

Between Groups
Within Groups
Total

ANOVA Effect Sizesa

Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM

implementation (1=Yes)

a. Eta-squared and Epsilon-squared are estimated based on the fixed-effect model.

Oneway

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input
Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Warnings
Text: KPIUseD Command: ONEWAY
Too many variables were specified.
Execution of this command stops.

Univariate Analysis of Variance

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Between-Subjects Factors

Primary motivations of NPOs for adopting RBM

 Tests of Between-Subject
Dependent Variable:

Source
Corrected Model
Intercept
RBM_AdoptionMotivation
RBM_Challenges
SexD
EducationD
MStatusD
LocationD
WorkLengthD
Error
Total
Corrected Total
a. R Squared = .788 (Adjusted R Squared = .765)

Estimated Marginal Means

Primary motivations of NPOs for adoptin

Dependent Variable:

Primary motivations of NPOs for adopting RBM

2.60
3.20
3.60
4.00
4.20
4.40
4.80
5.00
a. Covariates appearing in the model are evaluated at the following values: Main challenges NPOs encoun
= .5758, Education (1=Univ/Higher) = .9470, Marital Status (1=Ever Married) = .7879, Location (1=Harare)

Univariate Analysis of Variance

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Between-Subjects Factors

Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated)

Tests of Between-Subject
Dependent Variable:

Source
Corrected Model
Intercept
RBMIntegrationLevelD
RBM_Challenges
SexD
EducationD
MStatusD
LocationD
WorkLengthD
Error
Total
Corrected Total
a. R Squared = .476 (Adjusted R Squared = .447)

Estimated Marginal Means

Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully

Dependent Variable:

Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated)

.00
1.00
a. Covariates appearing in the model are evaluated at the following values: Main challenges NPOs encoun
= .5758, Education (1=Univ/Higher) = .9470, Marital Status (1=Ever Married) = .7879, Location (1=Harare)

Univariate Analysis of Variance

Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input

Missing Value Handling

Syntax

Resources

Between-Subjects Factors

Primary motivations of NPOs for adopting RBM

 Tests of Between-Subject
Dependent Variable:

Source
Corrected Model
Intercept
RBM_AdoptionMotivation
RBM_Challenges
SexD
EducationD
MStatusD
LocationD
WorkLengthD
Error
Total
Corrected Total
a. R Squared = .663 (Adjusted R Squared = .626)

Estimated Marginal Means

Primary motivations of NPOs for adoptin

Dependent Variable:

Primary motivations of NPOs for adopting RBM

2.60
3.20
3.60
4.00
4.20
4.40
4.80
5.00
a. Covariates appearing in the model are evaluated at the following values: Main challenges NPOs encoun
= .5758, Education (1=Univ/Higher) = .9470, Marital Status (1=Ever Married) = .7879, Location (1=Harare)
 Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 159

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics are based on all

cases with valid data.

FREQUENCIES
VARIABLES=Q2.1_EverImple
mentedRBM
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Processor Time [Link].02

Elapsed Time [Link].02

esktop\RBM Files\RBM Dataset [Link]

Statistics

Valid 159
Missing 0
 Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM

Frequency Percent
.00 27 17.0
1.00 132 83.0
Total 159 100.0

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used All non-missing data are used.

 DESCRIPTIVES
VARIABLES=Q2.4_Motive_Ac
countability
Q2.4_Motive_DecisionMaking

Q2.4_Motive_ResourceAllocati
on
Q2.4_MotiveDemonstrateImpa
ctFunders
Q2.4_MotiveCovidResponse
Q2.4_Other
/STATISTICS=MEAN
STDDEV VARIANCE MIN MAX
SEMEAN.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].02

Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum
Statistic Statistic Statistic
132 4.00 5.00
132 3.00 5.00

132 1.00 5.00

132 1.00 5.00

132 1.00 5.00

132 1.00 5.00

132
Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing MISSING=EXCLUDE: User-

defined missing values are
treated as missing.

Cases Used LISTWISE: Statistics are based

on cases with no missing
values for any variable used.
 FACTOR
/VARIABLES
Q2.4_Motive_Accountability
Q2.4_Motive_DecisionMaking
Q2.4_Motive_ResourceAllocati
on
Q2.4_MotiveDemonstrateImpa
ctFunders
Q2.4_MotiveCovidResponse
/MISSING LISTWISE
/ANALYSIS
Q2.4_Motive_Accountability
Q2.4_Motive_DecisionMaking
Q2.4_Motive_ResourceAllocati
on
Q2.4_MotiveDemonstrateImpa
ctFunders
Q2.4_MotiveCovidResponse
/PRINT INITIAL EXTRACTION
ROTATION
/FORMAT BLANK(.25)
/CRITERIA MINEIGEN(1)
ITERATE(25)
/EXTRACTION PAF
/CRITERIA ITERATE(25)
/ROTATION VARIMAX
/METHOD=CORRELATION.

Processor Time [Link].02

Elapsed Time [Link].02
Maximum Memory Required 4248 (4.148K) bytes
ommunalities
Initial Extraction
0.470 0.483
0.527 0.940

0.635 0.824

0.606 0.713

0.279 0.301

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues
Total % of Variance Cumulative %
2.337 46.734 46.734
1.504 30.083 76.817
0.624 12.472 89.289
0.335 6.696 95.985
0.201 4.015 100.000

actor Matrixa
Factor
1 2
0.377 0.584
0.624 0.741

0.830 -0.368
 0.725 -0.432

0.535

ired. (Convergence=.008). Extraction was terminated.

ed Factor Matrixa
Factor
1 2
0.694
0.954

0.903

0.844

0.524

ansformation Matrix

1 2
0.867 0.498
-0.498 0.867
Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Matrix Input
Definition of Missing User-defined missing values
are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics are based on all

cases with valid data for all
variables in the procedure.
 RELIABILITY

/VARIABLES=Q2.4_Motive_Ac
countability
Q2.4_Motive_DecisionMaking
Q2.4_Motive_ResourceAllocati
on
Q2.4_MotiveDemonstrateImpa
ctFunders
Q2.4_MotiveCovidResponse
/FORMAT=LABELS

/SCALE(ALPHA)=ALL/MODEL
=ALPHA
/STATISTICS=DESCRIPTIVE
SCALE
/SUMMARY=TOTAL .

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].00

Case Processing Summary

N %
Valid 132 100.0
Excludeda 0 0.0
Total 132 100.0

cs

N of Items
5
Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
4.7879 0.41037 132
4.5227 0.59855 132

4.3939 0.88893 132

4.3409 0.88092 132

3.0152 1.37583 132

Item-Total Statistics

Corrected Item-
Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted Total Correlation
16.2727 8.093 0.233
16.5379 7.289 0.358

16.6667 5.308 0.661

16.7197 5.608 0.580

18.0455 4.105 0.504

Scale Statistics
Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
8.805 2.96740 5
Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used All non-missing data are used.

DESCRIPTIVES
VARIABLES=RBM_AdoptionM
otivation
/STATISTICS=MEAN
STDDEV VARIANCE MIN MAX
SEMEAN.

Processor Time [Link].02

Elapsed Time [Link].00

Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum
Statistic Statistic Statistic
 132 2.60 5.00

132

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics are based on all

cases with valid data.

FREQUENCIES
VARIABLES=RBMIntegrationL
evelD
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].01

Statistics
 Valid 132
Missing 0

Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated)

Frequency Percent
.00 14 10.6
1.00 118 89.4
Total 132 100.0

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing For each dependent variable in

a table, user-defined missing
values for the dependent and
all grouping variables are
treated as missing.
Cases Used Cases used for each table
have no missing values in any
independent variable, and not
all dependent variables have
missing values.

MEANS
TABLES=RBMIntegrationLevel
D BY RBM_AdoptionMotivation
/CELLS=MEAN COUNT
STDDEV
/STATISTICS ANOVA.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].01

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Included Excluded
N Percent N
132 100.0% 0

Report

Mean N Std. Deviation

1.0000 6 0.00000
1.0000 7 0.00000
1.0000 7 0.00000
0.6667 42 0.47712
1.0000 7 0.00000
 1.0000 28 0.00000
1.0000 14 0.00000
1.0000 21 0.00000
0.8939 132 0.30909

ANOVA Table

Sum of Squares
Between Groups (Combined) 3.182

Within Groups 9.333

Total 12.515

res of Association
Eta Eta Squared
0.504 0.254

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each table are

based on all the cases with
valid data in the specified
range(s) for all variables in
each table.

CROSSTABS

/TABLES=RBM_AdoptionMotiv
ation BY
RBMIntegrationLevelD
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ
/CELLS=COUNT COLUMN
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].00
Dimensions Requested 2
Cells Available 524245

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing
N Percent N
 132 100.0% 0

ons of NPOs for adopting RBM * Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated) Crosstabu

Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated)

.00
N %
2.60 0 0.0%
3.20 0 0.0%
3.60 0 0.0%
4.00 14 100.0%
4.20 0 0.0%
4.40 0 0.0%
4.80 0 0.0%
5.00 0 0.0%
14 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
33.559 a
7 0.000
35.817 7 0.000
2.001 1 0.157

132
mum expected count is .64.
 Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics are based on all

cases with valid data.

FREQUENCIES
VARIABLES=KPIUseD
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].00

Statistics

Valid 132
Missing 0
e specific KPIs for outcome measurement (1=Yes)

N % %
35 26.5% 26.5%
97 73.5% 73.5%
132 100.0% 100.0%

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each table are

based on all the cases with
valid data in the specified
range(s) for all variables in
each table.
 CROSSTABS

/TABLES=RBM_AdoptionMotiv
ation BY KPIUseD
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ
/CELLS=COUNT COLUMN
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].00
Dimensions Requested 2
Cells Available 524245

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing
N Percent N
132 100.0% 0

vations of NPOs for adopting RBM * Use specific KPIs for outcome measurement (1=Yes) Crosstabulati

Use specific KPIs for outcome measurement (1=Yes)

.00
N %
2.60 0 0.0%
3.20 0 0.0%
3.60 0 0.0%
4.00 21 60.0%
4.20 0 0.0%
 4.40 0 0.0%
4.80 0 0.0%
5.00 14 40.0%
35 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
54.161 a
7 0.000
67.733 7 0.000
4.773 1 0.029

132
mum expected count is 1.59.

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132
 Definition of Missing User-defined missing values
are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each table are

based on all the cases with
valid data in the specified
range(s) for all variables in
each table.

CROSSTABS

/TABLES=RBMIntegrationLeve
lD BY KPIUseD
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ
/CELLS=COUNT COLUMN
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].01
Dimensions Requested 2
Cells Available 524245

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing
N Percent N
132 100.0% 0

nciples integration (1=Fully Integrated) * Use specific KPIs for outcome measurement (1=Yes) Crosstab
 Use specific KPIs for outcome measurement (1=Yes)
.00
N %
.00 7 20.0%

1.00 28 80.0%

35 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
4.433 a
1 0.035
3.187 1 0.074
3.971 1 0.046

4.399 1 0.036

132
mum expected count is 3.71.

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each pair of

variables are based on all the
cases with valid data for that
pair.

CORRELATIONS

/VARIABLES=RBMIntegrationL
evelD KPIUseD
/PRINT=TWOTAIL NOSIG
FULL
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].01

Correlations

Use specific KPIs

for outcome
Extent of RBM principles measurement
integration (1=Fully Integrated) (1=Yes)
Pearson Correlation 1 .183*
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.035
N 132 132
Pearson Correlation .183* 1
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.035
 N 132 132

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used All non-missing data are used.

 DESCRIPTIVES
VARIABLES=Q5.1_Challenges
LackResources
Q5.1_ChallengesDataCollectio
n
Q5.1_ChallengesResistanceTo
Change
Q5.1_ChallengesStaffCapacity
Q5.1_ChallengesAdaptationto
Circumastances
/STATISTICS=MEAN
STDDEV VARIANCE MIN MAX
SEMEAN.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].00

Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum
Statistic Statistic Statistic
132 2.00 5.00

132 2.00 5.00

132 1.00 5.00

132 1.00 5.00

132 2.00 5.00

132
Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing MISSING=EXCLUDE: User-

defined missing values are
treated as missing.

Cases Used LISTWISE: Statistics are based

on cases with no missing
values for any variable used.
 FACTOR
/VARIABLES
Q5.1_ChallengesLackResourc
es
Q5.1_ChallengesDataCollectio
n
Q5.1_ChallengesResistanceTo
Change
Q5.1_ChallengesStaffCapacity
Q5.1_ChallengesAdaptationto
Circumastances
/MISSING LISTWISE
/ANALYSIS
Q5.1_ChallengesLackResourc
es
Q5.1_ChallengesDataCollectio
n
Q5.1_ChallengesResistanceTo
Change
Q5.1_ChallengesStaffCapacity
Q5.1_ChallengesAdaptationto
Circumastances
/PRINT INITIAL EXTRACTION
ROTATION
/FORMAT BLANK(.25)
/CRITERIA MINEIGEN(1)
ITERATE(25)
/EXTRACTION PAF
/CRITERIA ITERATE(25)
/ROTATION VARIMAX
/METHOD=CORRELATION.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].02
 Maximum Memory Required 4248 (4.148K) bytes

Initial
0.706

0.133

0.759

0.747

0.672

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues
Total % of Variance Cumulative %
3.011 60.220 60.220
1.088 21.755 81.975
0.561 11.221 93.196
0.216 4.316 97.513
0.124 2.487 100.000
Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Matrix Input
Definition of Missing User-defined missing values
are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics are based on all

cases with valid data for all
variables in the procedure.
 RELIABILITY

/VARIABLES=Q5.1_Challenge
sLackResources
Q5.1_ChallengesDataCollectio
n
Q5.1_ChallengesResistanceTo
Change
Q5.1_ChallengesStaffCapacity
Q5.1_ChallengesAdaptationto
Circumastances
/FORMAT=LABELS

/SCALE(ALPHA)=ALL/MODEL
=ALPHA
/STATISTICS=DESCRIPTIVE
SCALE
/SUMMARY=TOTAL .

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].00

Case Processing Summary

N %
Valid 132 100.0
Excludeda 0 0.0
Total 132 100.0

cs

N of Items
5
Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
3.5758 1.09907 132

4.1061 0.91849 132

3.5303 1.28074 132

3.5758 1.19235 132

4.0530 0.95161 132

Item-Total Statistics

Corrected Item-
Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted Total Correlation
15.2652 10.990 0.706

14.7348 15.372 0.156

15.3106 9.300 0.819

15.2652 9.922 0.798

 14.7879 12.458 0.592

Scale Statistics
Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
17.341 4.16424 5

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used All non-missing data are used.

 DESCRIPTIVES
VARIABLES=RBM_Challenges
/STATISTICS=MEAN
STDDEV VARIANCE MIN MAX
SEMEAN.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].00

Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum
Statistic Statistic Statistic
132 2.40 5.00

132

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132
 Definition of Missing User-defined missing values
are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each table are

based on all the cases with
valid data in the specified
range(s) for all variables in
each table.

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=RBM_Challenges
BY KPIUseD
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ
/CELLS=COUNT COLUMN
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].02
Dimensions Requested 2
Cells Available 524245

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing
N Percent N
132 100.0% 0

countered during the implementation of RBM * Use specific KPIs for outcome measurement (1=Yes) C
 Use specific KPIs for outcome measurement (1=Yes)
.00
N %
2.40 0 0.0%
2.60 0 0.0%
3.20 0 0.0%
3.40 7 20.0%
3.60 0 0.0%
3.80 0 0.0%
4.00 21 60.0%
4.20 0 0.0%
4.40 0 0.0%
4.60 0 0.0%
4.80 7 20.0%
5.00 0 0.0%
35 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
114.037a 11 0.000
133.283 11 0.000
5.073 1 0.024

132
imum expected count is 1.59.

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]
Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\
OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each pair of

variables are based on all the
cases with valid data for that
pair.

CORRELATIONS

/VARIABLES=RBM_Challenge
s KPIUseD
/PRINT=TWOTAIL NOSIG
FULL
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].00

Correlations
 Use specific KPIs
Main challenges NPOs for outcome
encountered during the measurement
implementation of RBM (1=Yes)
Pearson Correlation 1 -.197*
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.024
N 132 132
Pearson Correlation -.197* 1
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.024
N 132 132

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.
 Cases Used Statistics for each table are
based on all the cases with
valid data in the specified
range(s) for all variables in
each table.

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=RBM_Challenges
BY RBMIntegrationLevelD
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ
/CELLS=COUNT COLUMN
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].01
Dimensions Requested 2
Cells Available 524245

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing
N Percent N
132 100.0% 0

untered during the implementation of RBM * Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated

Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated)

.00
 N %
2.40 0 0.0%
2.60 0 0.0%
3.20 0 0.0%
3.40 7 50.0%
3.60 0 0.0%
3.80 0 0.0%
4.00 0 0.0%
4.20 0 0.0%
4.40 7 50.0%
4.60 0 0.0%
4.80 0 0.0%
5.00 0 0.0%
14 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
95.085 a
11 0.000
69.876 11 0.000
0.392 1 0.531

132
imum expected count is .64.

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]
Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\
OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each pair of

variables are based on all the
cases with valid data for that
pair.

CORRELATIONS

/VARIABLES=RBM_Challenge
s RBMIntegrationLevelD
/PRINT=TWOTAIL NOSIG
FULL
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].02

Correlations
 Extent of RBM
principles
Main challenges NPOs integration
encountered during the (1=Fully
implementation of RBM Integrated)
Pearson Correlation 1 -0.055
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.533
N 132 132
Pearson Correlation -0.055 1
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.533
N 132 132

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.
 Cases Used Statistics are based on all
cases with valid data.

FREQUENCIES
VARIABLES=PerformanceImpr
oved
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].00

Statistics

Valid 132
Missing 0

d measurable outcomes as a result of RBM implementation (1=Yes)

N % %
21 15.9% 15.9%
111 84.1% 84.1%
132 100.0% 100.0%

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each pair of

variables are based on all the
cases with valid data for that
pair.

CORRELATIONS

/VARIABLES=RBM_Challenge
s PerformanceImproved
/PRINT=TWOTAIL NOSIG
FULL
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].00

Correlations

Organization
achieved
measurable
outcomes as a
Main challenges NPOs result of RBM
encountered during the implementation
implementation of RBM (1=Yes)
Pearson Correlation 1 -.226**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.009
 N 132 132
Pearson Correlation -.226** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.009
N 132 132

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each pair of

variables are based on all the
cases with valid data for that
pair.
 CORRELATIONS

/VARIABLES=PerformanceImp
roved KPIUseD
/PRINT=TWOTAIL NOSIG
FULL
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].00

Correlations

Organization achieved Use specific KPIs

measurable outcomes as a for outcome
result of RBM implementation measurement
(1=Yes) (1=Yes)
Pearson Correlation 1 0.067
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.444
N 132 132
Pearson Correlation 0.067 1
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.444
N 132 132

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each pair of

variables are based on all the
cases with valid data for that
pair.

CORRELATIONS

/VARIABLES=PerformanceImp
roved RBMIntegrationLevelD
/PRINT=TWOTAIL NOSIG
FULL
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].00

Correlations

Extent of RBM
Organization achieved principles
measurable outcomes as a integration
result of RBM implementation (1=Fully
(1=Yes) Integrated)
Pearson Correlation 1 -0.150
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.086
 N 132 132
Pearson Correlation -0.150 1
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.086
N 132 132

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each table are

based on all the cases with
valid data in the specified
range(s) for all variables in
each table.
 CROSSTABS

/TABLES=PerformanceImprov
ed BY RBMIntegrationLevelD
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ
/CELLS=COUNT
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].00
Dimensions Requested 2
Cells Available 524245

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing
N Percent N
132 100.0% 0

sult of RBM implementation (1=Yes) * Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated)
Crosstabulation

Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully

Integrated)
.00 1.00
.00 0 21
 1.00 14 97

14 118

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
2.963 a
1 0.085
1.782 1 0.182
5.156 1 0.023

2.940 1 0.086

132
mum expected count is 2.23.

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each table are

based on all the cases with
valid data in the specified
range(s) for all variables in
each table.

CROSSTABS

/TABLES=PerformanceImprov
ed BY RBMIntegrationLevelD
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ
/CELLS=COUNT COLUMN
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].00
Dimensions Requested 2
Cells Available 524245

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing
N Percent N
 132 100.0% 0

utcomes as a result of RBM implementation (1=Yes) * Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully In

Extent of RBM principles integration (1=Fully Integrated)

.00
N %
.00 0 0.0%

1.00 14 100.0%

14 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
2.963 a
1 0.085
1.782 1 0.182
5.156 1 0.023

2.940 1 0.086

132
mum expected count is 2.23.
Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each table are

based on all the cases with
valid data in the specified
range(s) for all variables in
each table.

CROSSTABS

/TABLES=PerformanceImprov
ed BY KPIUseD
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ
/CELLS=COUNT COLUMN
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].00
 Dimensions Requested 2
Cells Available 524245

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing
N Percent N
132 100.0% 0

e outcomes as a result of RBM implementation (1=Yes) * Use specific KPIs for outcome measurement (1

Use specific KPIs for outcome measurement (1=Yes)

.00
N %
.00 7 20.0%

1.00 28 80.0%

35 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
.596 a
1 0.440
0.252 1 0.615
0.573 1 0.449
 0.591 1 0.442

132
um expected count is 5.57.

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each table are

based on all the cases with
valid data in the specified
range(s) for all variables in
each table.
 CROSSTABS
/TABLES=KPIUseD BY
PerformanceImproved
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ
/CELLS=COUNT
/COUNT ROUND CELL
/BARCHART.

Processor Time [Link].02

Elapsed Time [Link].39
Dimensions Requested 2
Cells Available 524245

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing
N Percent N
132 100.0% 0

Yes) * Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM implementation (1=Yes)

Crosstabulation

Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a

result of RBM implementation (1=Yes)
.00 1.00
 .00 7 28

1.00 14 83

21 111

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
.596 a
1 0.440
0.252 1 0.615
0.573 1 0.449

0.591 1 0.442

132
um expected count is 5.57.
Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]
Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\
OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each table are

based on all the cases with
valid data in the specified
range(s) for all variables in
each table.

CROSSTABS

/TABLES=RBMIntegrationLeve
lD BY PerformanceImproved
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ
/CELLS=COUNT
/COUNT ROUND CELL
/BARCHART.

Processor Time [Link].14

Elapsed Time [Link].11
Dimensions Requested 2
Cells Available 524245
 Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing
N Percent N
132 100.0% 0

grated) * Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a result of RBM implementation (1=Yes)

Crosstabulation

Organization achieved measurable outcomes as a

result of RBM implementation (1=Yes)
.00 1.00
.00 0 14

1.00 21 97

21 111

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
2.963 a
1 0.085
1.782 1 0.182
5.156 1 0.023
 2.940 1 0.086

132
mum expected count is 2.23.

Notes
 06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each analysis are

based on cases with no
missing data for any variable in
the analysis.

ONEWAY
PerformanceImproved BY
RBMIntegrationLevelD
/ES=OVERALL
/MISSING ANALYSIS
/CRITERIA=CILEVEL(0.95).

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].00

ANOVA

Sum of Squares df Mean Square

 0.396 1 0.396
17.263 130 0.133
17.659 131

ANOVA Effect Sizesa,b

95% Confidence Interval
Point Estimate Lower
Eta-squared 0.022 0.000
Epsilon-squared 0.015 -0.008
Omega-squared Fixed-effect 0.015 -0.008

Omega-squared Random-effect 0.015 -0.008

the fixed-effect model.

ed to zero.

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132
 Definition of Missing User-defined missing values
are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each analysis are

based on cases with no
missing data for any variable in
the analysis.

ONEWAY
PerformanceImproved BY
KPIUseD
/ES=OVERALL
/MISSING ANALYSIS
/CRITERIA=CILEVEL(0.95).

Processor Time [Link].02

Elapsed Time [Link].02

ANOVA

Sum of Squares df Mean Square

0.080 1 0.080
17.579 130 0.135
17.659 131

ANOVA Effect Sizesa,b

95% Confidence Interval
Point Estimate Lower
Eta-squared 0.005 0.000
Epsilon-squared -0.003 -0.008
Omega-squared Fixed-effect -0.003 -0.008

Omega-squared Random-effect -0.003 -0.008

the fixed-effect model.

ed to zero.

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each analysis are

based on cases with no
missing data for any variable in
the analysis.

ONEWAY
PerformanceImproved BY
RBM_Challenges
/ES=OVERALL
/MISSING ANALYSIS
/CRITERIA=CILEVEL(0.95).

Processor Time [Link].02

Elapsed Time [Link].02
 ANOVA

Sum of Squares df Mean Square

9.492 11 0.863
8.167 120 0.068
17.659 131

ANOVA Effect Sizesa

95% Confidence Interval
Point Estimate Lower
Eta-squared 0.538 0.371
Epsilon-squared 0.495 0.313
Omega-squared Fixed-effect 0.493 0.312

Omega-squared Random-effect 0.081 0.040

the fixed-effect model.

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
 Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each analysis are

based on cases with no
missing data for any variable in
the analysis.

ONEWAY
PerformanceImproved BY
RBMIntegrationLevelD
KPIUseD RBM_Challenges
EducationD
MStatusD LocationD SexD
WorkLengthD
/ES=OVERALL
/MISSING ANALYSIS
/CRITERIA=CILEVEL(0.95).

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].01

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]
Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\
OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics are based on all

cases with valid data for all
variables in the model.
 UNIANOVA
PerformanceImproved BY
RBM_AdoptionMotivation
WITH RBM_Challenges SexD
EducationD MStatusD
LocationD WorkLengthD
/METHOD = SSTYPE(3)
/INTERCEPT = INCLUDE
/EMMEANS =
TABLES(RBM_AdoptionMotiva
tion)
WITH(RBM_Challenges=MEA
N SexD=MEAN
EducationD=MEAN
MStatusD=MEAN
LocationD=MEAN
WorkLengthD=MEAN)
/CRITERIA = ALPHA(.05)
/DESIGN =
RBM_AdoptionMotivation
RBM_Challenges SexD
EducationD MStatusD
LocationD WorkLengthD.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].02

n-Subjects Factors
N
2.60 6
3.20 7
3.60 7
4.00 42
4.20 7
4.40 28
4.80 14
 5.00 21

Tests of
Organization Between-Subjects Effects
achieved
measurable outcomes as a
result of RBM implementation
(1=Yes)
Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square
13.921a 13 1.071
0.101 1 0.101
5.663 7 0.809
0.073 1 0.073
0.005 1 0.005
1.633 1 1.633
3.355 1 3.355
0.295 1 0.295
0.034 1 0.034
3.738 118 0.032
111.000 132
17.659 131

rimary motivations
Organizationofachieved
NPOs for adopting RBM
measurable outcomes as a
result of RBM implementation
(1=Yes) 95% Confidence Interval
Mean Std. Error Lower Bound
.873 a
0.082 0.711
-.142a 0.078 -0.296
.844a 0.072 0.702
.878a 0.042 0.795
.829a 0.073 0.685
.821a 0.034 0.752
.833a 0.054 0.725
 1.121a 0.076 0.970
owing values: Main challenges NPOs encountered during the implementation of RBM = 3.7682, Sex (1=Male)
=Ever Married) = .7879, Location (1=Harare) = .9621, YearsWorked(1=Over 5 years) = .6364.

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]

Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\

OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics are based on all

cases with valid data for all
variables in the model.
 UNIANOVA
PerformanceImproved BY
RBMIntegrationLevelD WITH
RBM_Challenges SexD
EducationD MStatusD
LocationD WorkLengthD
/METHOD = SSTYPE(3)
/INTERCEPT = INCLUDE
/EMMEANS =
TABLES(RBMIntegrationLevel
D)
WITH(RBM_Challenges=MEA
N SexD=MEAN
EducationD=MEAN
MStatusD=MEAN
LocationD=MEAN
WorkLengthD=MEAN)
/CRITERIA = ALPHA(.05)
/DESIGN =
RBMIntegrationLevelD
RBM_Challenges SexD
EducationD MStatusD
LocationD WorkLengthD.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].00

n-Subjects Factors
N
.00 14

1.00 118

Tests of
Organization Between-Subjects Effects
achieved
measurable outcomes as a
result of RBM implementation
(1=Yes)
Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square
 8.409a 7 1.201
0.615 1 0.615
0.152 1 0.152
0.019 1 0.019
0.135 1 0.135
0.331 1 0.331
4.267 1 4.267
0.003 1 0.003
1.638 1 1.638
9.250 124 0.075
111.000 132
17.659 131

t of RBMOrganization
principles integration
achieved (1=Fully Integrated)
measurable outcomes as a
result of RBM implementation
(1=Yes)
95% Confidence Interval

Mean Std. Error Lower Bound

1.001 a
0.115 0.774
.822a 0.027 0.768
owing values: Main challenges NPOs encountered during the implementation of RBM = 3.7682, Sex (1=Male)
=Ever Married) = .7879, Location (1=Harare) = .9621, YearsWorked(1=Over 5 years) = .6364.

Notes
06-JUL-2024 [Link]
Data C:\Users\Fadzai Mushayi\
OneDrive\Desktop\RBM Files\
RBM Dataset [Link]

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter Q2.1_EverImplementedRBM =
1 (FILTER)

Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 132

Definition of Missing User-defined missing values

are treated as missing.

Cases Used Statistics are based on all

cases with valid data for all
variables in the model.
 UNIANOVA
RBMIntegrationLevelD BY
RBM_AdoptionMotivation
WITH RBM_Challenges SexD
EducationD MStatusD
LocationD WorkLengthD
/METHOD = SSTYPE(3)
/INTERCEPT = INCLUDE
/EMMEANS =
TABLES(RBM_AdoptionMotiva
tion)
WITH(RBM_Challenges=MEA
N SexD=MEAN
EducationD=MEAN
MStatusD=MEAN
LocationD=MEAN
WorkLengthD=MEAN)
/CRITERIA = ALPHA(.05)
/DESIGN =
RBM_AdoptionMotivation
RBM_Challenges SexD
EducationD MStatusD
LocationD WorkLengthD.

Processor Time [Link].00

Elapsed Time [Link].00

n-Subjects Factors
N
2.60 6
3.20 7
3.60 7
4.00 42
4.20 7
4.40 28
4.80 14
 5.00 21

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Extent of RBM principles
integration (1=Fully Integrated)

Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square

8.299a 13 0.638
0.005 1 0.005
0.522 7 0.075
0.099 1 0.099
0.391 1 0.391
2.930 1 2.930
0.324 1 0.324
0.019 1 0.019
0.505 1 0.505
4.216 118 0.036
118.000 132
12.515 131

rimary motivations of NPOs for adopting RBM

Extent of RBM principles
integration (1=Fully Integrated)
95% Confidence Interval
Mean Std. Error Lower Bound
1.049 a
0.087 0.876
1.066a 0.083 0.902
.821a 0.076 0.670
.869a 0.044 0.781
.839a 0.077 0.686
.978a 0.037 0.905
.834a 0.058 0.720
 .814a 0.081 0.654
owing values: Main challenges NPOs encountered during the implementation of RBM = 3.7682, Sex (1=Male)
=Ever Married) = .7879, Location (1=Harare) = .9621, YearsWorked(1=Over 5 years) = .6364.
 Cumulative
Valid Percent Percent
17.0 17.0
83.0 100.0
100.0
 Mean Std. Deviation Variance
Statistic Std. Error Statistic Statistic
4.7879 0.03572 0.41037 0.168
4.5227 0.05210 0.59855 0.358

4.3939 0.07737 0.88893 0.790

4.3409 0.07667 0.88092 0.776

3.0152 0.11975 1.37583 1.893

3.8333 0.10325 1.18622 1.407

 Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings
Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance
2.033 40.659 40.659 1.833 36.661
1.228 24.557 65.216 1.428 28.556
Cronbach's Alpha
if Item Deleted
0.704
0.670

0.531

0.570

0.654
 Mean Std. Deviation Variance
Statistic Std. Error Statistic Statistic
4.2121 0.05166 0.59348 0.352
 Cumulative
Valid Percent Percent
10.6 10.6
89.4 100.0
100.0
Excluded Total
Percent N Percent
0.0% 132 100.0%
df Mean Square F Sig.
7 0.455 6.039 0.000

124 0.075

131
Missing Total
Percent N Percent
 0.0% 132 100.0%

=Fully Integrated) Crosstabulation

integration (1=Fully Integrated)

1.00 Total
N % N %
6 5.1% 6 4.5%
7 5.9% 7 5.3%
7 5.9% 7 5.3%
28 23.7% 42 31.8%
7 5.9% 7 5.3%
28 23.7% 28 21.2%
14 11.9% 14 10.6%
21 17.8% 21 15.9%
118 100.0% 132 100.0%
%
26.5%
100.0%
 Missing Total
Percent N Percent
0.0% 132 100.0%

rement (1=Yes) Crosstabulation

utcome measurement (1=Yes)

1.00 Total
N % N %
6 6.2% 6 4.5%
7 7.2% 7 5.3%
7 7.2% 7 5.3%
21 21.6% 42 31.8%
7 7.2% 7 5.3%
28 28.9% 28 21.2%
14 14.4% 14 10.6%
7 7.2% 21 15.9%
97 100.0% 132 100.0%
 Missing Total
Percent N Percent
0.0% 132 100.0%

easurement (1=Yes) Crosstabulation

utcome measurement (1=Yes)
1.00 Total
N % N %
7 7.2% 14 10.6%

90 92.8% 118 89.4%

97 100.0% 132 100.0%

Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

sided) sided)

0.052 0.042
 Mean Std. Deviation Variance
Statistic Std. Error Statistic Statistic
3.5758 0.09566 1.09907 1.208

4.1061 0.07994 0.91849 0.844

3.5303 0.11147 1.28074 1.640

3.5758 0.10378 1.19235 1.422

4.0530 0.08283 0.95161 0.906

Cronbach's Alpha
if Item Deleted
0.750

0.884

0.706

0.715
0.786
 Mean Std. Deviation Variance
Statistic Std. Error Statistic Statistic
3.7682 0.07249 0.83285 0.694
 Missing Total
Percent N Percent
0.0% 132 100.0%

ome measurement (1=Yes) Crosstabulation

utcome measurement (1=Yes)
1.00 Total
N % N %
21 21.6% 21 15.9%
7 7.2% 7 5.3%
7 7.2% 7 5.3%
0 0.0% 7 5.3%
14 14.4% 14 10.6%
6 6.2% 6 4.5%
0 0.0% 21 15.9%
7 7.2% 7 5.3%
14 14.4% 14 10.6%
7 7.2% 7 5.3%
7 7.2% 14 10.6%
7 7.2% 7 5.3%
97 100.0% 132 100.0%
 Missing Total
Percent N Percent
0.0% 132 100.0%

egration (1=Fully Integrated) Crosstabulation

integration (1=Fully Integrated)

1.00 Total
N % N %
21 17.8% 21 15.9%
7 5.9% 7 5.3%
7 5.9% 7 5.3%
0 0.0% 7 5.3%
14 11.9% 14 10.6%
6 5.1% 6 4.5%
21 17.8% 21 15.9%
7 5.9% 7 5.3%
7 5.9% 14 10.6%
7 5.9% 7 5.3%
14 11.9% 14 10.6%
7 5.9% 7 5.3%
118 100.0% 132 100.0%
%
15.9%
100.0%
 Missing Total
Percent N Percent
0.0% 132 100.0%

on (1=Fully Integrated)

Total
21
 111

132

Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

sided) sided)

0.125 0.077
Missing Total
Percent N Percent
 0.0% 132 100.0%

ciples integration (1=Fully Integrated) Crosstabulation

integration (1=Fully Integrated)

1.00 Total
N % N %
21 17.8% 21 15.9%

97 82.2% 111 84.1%

118 100.0% 132 100.0%

Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

sided) sided)

0.125 0.077
 Missing Total
Percent N Percent
0.0% 132 100.0%

for outcome measurement (1=Yes) Crosstabulation

utcome measurement (1=Yes)

1.00 Total
N % N %
14 14.4% 21 15.9%

83 85.6% 111 84.1%

97 100.0% 132 100.0%

Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

sided) sided)

0.431 0.300
 Missing Total
Percent N Percent
0.0% 132 100.0%

lementation (1=Yes)

Total
 35

97

132

Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

sided) sided)

0.431 0.300
 Missing Total
Percent N Percent
0.0% 132 100.0%

mplementation (1=Yes)

Total
14

118

132

Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

sided) sided)

0.125 0.077
F Sig.
 2.985 0.086

% Confidence Interval
Upper
0.094
0.087
0.086

0.086
 F Sig.
0.589 0.444

% Confidence Interval
Upper
0.053
0.046
0.046

0.046
 F Sig.
12.680 0.000

% Confidence Interval
Upper
0.593
0.556
0.554

0.102
 F Sig.
33.799 0.000
3.196 0.076
25.534 0.000
2.309 0.131
0.163 0.687
51.551 0.000
105.905 0.000
9.310 0.003
1.076 0.302

% Confidence Interval
Upper Bound
1.036
0.013
0.986
0.961
0.972
0.889
0.940
 1.271
M = 3.7682, Sex (1=Male)
) = .6364.
F Sig.
 16.105 0.000
8.242 0.005
2.032 0.157
0.258 0.612
1.807 0.181
4.437 0.037
57.201 0.000
0.044 0.833
21.963 0.000

% Confidence Interval

Upper Bound
1.228
0.876
M = 3.7682, Sex (1=Male)
) = .6364.
 F Sig.
17.866 0.000
0.131 0.718
2.087 0.050
2.765 0.099
10.935 0.001
81.999 0.000
9.069 0.003
0.522 0.472
14.120 0.000

% Confidence Interval
Upper Bound
1.221
1.230
0.972
0.957
0.991
1.050
0.949
 0.974
M = 3.7682, Sex (1=Male)
) = .6364.
of Squared Loadings
Cumulative %
36.661
65.216