Newborn Circumcision Techniques
Newborn Circumcision Techniques
Newborn male circumcision is a common elective surgical procedure for the removal of foreskin covering the glans penis. The
American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, and the American Academy of Family Physicians recognize that there are health benefits of newborn male
circumcision but do not universally recommend the procedure. Performing male circumcision during the neonatal period
has several advantages, including a lower risk of complications, faster healing, and lower cost. The three most common
techniques for newborn male circumcision utilize the Mogen clamp, the Gomco clamp, or the Plastibell device. Complica-
tions are uncommon and can include bleeding, injury to the penis, adhesions, excessive skin removal, phimosis, and meatal
stenosis. Anatomic and medical contraindications may require that the procedure be deferred beyond the neonatal period.
Infants with anatomic abnormalities should be referred to a pediatric urologist. Physicians should present information about
potential benefits and risks rather than withholding or recommending circumcision. Parents should weigh the health benefits
and risks and consider their own religious, cultural, and personal preferences when making the decision. (Am Fam Physician.
2020;101(11):680-685. Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Family Physicians.)
Newborn male circumcision is a common elective sur- Established health benefits of circumcision include a
gical procedure for the removal of foreskin covering the reduced lifetime incidence of urinary tract infections,
glans penis. It is most often performed in the first days of penile cancer, phimosis, HIV, and several other sexually
life.1 According to the World Health Organization, there transmitted infections.3,6,8-10 A 2017 systematic review con-
are several advantages of circumcising males at a younger cluded that the health benefits of newborn circumcision
age, including a lower risk of complications, faster healing, are greater than the risks associated with the procedure.11
and lower cost.2,3 The frequency of adverse events is four Despite these benefits, the newborn male circumcision rate
per 1,000 procedures for early infant circumcision, but this has declined in the United States, from 83% in the 1960s
number increases 10- to 20‐fold in older boys.4 Physicians to 77% in 2010.12 There are racial and ethnic differences in
should present information about potential benefits and the overall circumcision rate:over the past decade, 91% of
risks rather than withholding or recommending circumci- white males reported having been circumcised compared
sion, and parents should consider their own religious, cul- with 76% of black males and 44% of Hispanic males.5,8,11,13 In
tural, and personal preferences when making the decision.3,5 some states, these differences may be related to an increas-
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the Ameri- ing Hispanic population and lack of Medicaid coverage.11
can College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Centers The data used by the AAP and CDC to support their pol-
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Amer- icy statements have largely been extrapolated from adult
ican Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) recognize the circumcision studies performed in the sub-Saharan region
potential health benefits of newborn male circumcision, but of Africa. Because of the lack of direct evidence of bene-
they do not universally recommend the procedure.3,6,7 The fit, some consider newborn circumcision unnecessary.9,14 A
AAFP recommends that circumcision be available and cov- 2010 systematic review found that although complications
ered by health insurance for those who desire it.7 are rare, there is little evidence to support circumcision.15
680 American
Downloaded from Family Physician
the American Family Physician website at www.aafp.org/afp.
www.aafp.org/afp © 2020 American Academy Volume
Copyright of Family101,
Physicians.
Number For11the private,
◆ June 1,non-
2020
commercial use of one individual user of the website. All other rights reserved. Contact [email protected] for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
NEWBORN CIRCUMCISION
SORT:KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE
Evidence
Clinical recommendation rating Comments
Parents should be offered newborn circumcision in a nonbiased C Expert opinion and consensus
conversation regarding potential benefits and harms. 3,6,7 guidelines
The Mogen clamp, the Gomco clamp, and the Plastibell device C Usual practice and expert opinion in the
can be used effectively for newborn circumcision.19 absence of clinical trials
Local anesthesia should be used during newborn B Randomized controlled trials and
circumcision. 26-30 meta-analyses showing benefit
Infants with abnormal penile anatomy should be referred to a C Usual practice and expert opinion in the
pediatric urologist for circumcision.1,20,22 absence of clinical trials
A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence;B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence;C = consensus, disease-
oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to https://w ww.aafp.
org/afpsort.
Circumcision Techniques
The three most common techniques 18 for circumcision uti-
lize the Mogen clamp (Figure 1), the Gomco clamp (Figure 2),
or the Plastibell device (Figure 3). Because these techniques
are equally effective, the choice of device should be guided
by the physician’s experience and comfort level.19,20 The
Mogen and Gomco clamps protect the glans, and the Plas-
B
tibell induces tissue necrosis, which is sloughed off with the
plastic shield.21
When using the Gomco clamp or Plastibell, the choice
of device size depends on the diameter of the glans rather
than penile length.22 The Gomco clamp ranges from 1.1 to
1.6 cm, and the Plastibell from 1.1 to 1.7 cm. The most com-
monly used size for either device is 1.3 cm.23 Circumcision
using the Mogen clamp can be completed in less than five
minutes, whereas procedures using the Gomco clamp or
Plastibell can take up to 10 minutes.24,25 In general, the time
required to complete the procedure is inversely related to Mogen clamp in the open (A) and closed (B) positions.
the physician’s level of experience.
June 1, 2020 ◆ Volume 101, Number 11 www.aafp.org/afp American Family Physician 681
NEWBORN CIRCUMCISION
FIGURE 2
A B
GOMCO CLAMP
A video demonstrating a circumcision using a Gomco
clamp is available at https://v imeo.com/74547358. A
straight hemostat is applied at the 12 o’clock position to
create a crush line. With blunt-edge scissors facing the
glans, a small incision is made one-third to one-half the
distance from the coronal margin to expose the glans. The
foreskin is retracted to break away any remaining adhe-
sions. The bell of the clamp is placed under the foreskin
and over the glans, and the foreskin is pulled over the bell
Plastibell device. with the attached hemostats. A hemostat or a small safety
pin is used to bring the edges of the dorsal incision together
over the flare of the bell before the base plate is applied. The
plus sucrose;lidocaine/prilocaine plus sucrose plus dorsal hemostats at the 10 and 2 o’clock positions are removed,
penile nerve block;and lidocaine/prilocaine plus sucrose the foreskin is gently pulled through the hole in the base
plus ring block) showed that combination analgesics, espe- plate, and the base plate is placed over the bell. The tip of
cially topical anesthetic plus sucrose plus ring block, are the incision should be visible above the base plate. The yoke
more effective.30 of the top plate (rocker arm) is attached to the arms of the
bell, and the other end of the top plate is tightened to the
Procedure base plate and left in place for five minutes. During this
The duration of the procedure, bleeding, and complications time, excess foreskin is removed with a scalpel. After five
vary depending on which device is used. The Mogen clamp minutes, the plates are loosened and the clamp disassem-
requires the least training and procedure time, and it is bled, and sterile gauze is used to gently tease the crushed
associated with less bleeding and fewer complications. The foreskin off of the bell.
Gomco clamp and Plastibell require more training and lon-
ger procedures, and are associated with more bleeding and MOGEN CLAMP
more complications.18,25,31,32 A video demonstrating a circumcision using a
The procedure setup, including the aseptic field, anes- Mogen clamp is available at https://med.stanford.
thesia, and positioning of the infant, is the same regardless edu/newborns/professional-education/circumcision/
682 American Family Physician www.aafp.org/afp Volume 101, Number 11 ◆ June 1, 2020
NEWBORN CIRCUMCISION
FIGURE 4
10 o’clock 2 o’clock
Dorsal nerve
of penis Deep
(Buck’s)
fascia
Corpus
cavernosum
Cross-section
Nerve blocks used for anesthesia during circumcision. (A) Dorsal penile nerve block. With a single syringe, inject
0.2 to 0.4 mL of lidocaine subcutaneously at the base of the penis in the 10 and 2 o’clock positions to anesthetize
both branches of the dorsal penile nerve. (B) Ring block. With a single syringe, inject 0.8 mL of lidocaine subcu-
taneously around the perimeter of the base of the penis. Two or more injections will be needed to complete the
circumferential block.
Illustration by Dave Klemm
mogen-clamp-technique.html. Once the adhesions have injuring the urethra, the probe is used to gently separate the
been lysed, the glans is pushed downward. The foreskin is foreskin, then push it down below the corona, fully expos-
held with hemostats at the 9 and 3 o’clock positions, then ing the glans and breaking away any remaining adhesions.
slid between the narrowly opened (3 mm) Mogen clamp. The
clamp is applied with the concave surface facing downward PLASTIBELL
after ensuring that the distal glans (tip of the penis) is not The Plastibell technique begins similarly to the Gomco
caught in the clamp. The clamp is closed and left on for 60 to clamp technique. A straight hemostat is applied at the
90 seconds. Excess foreskin is removed with a scalpel, 12 o’clock position to create a crush line, then with blunt-
then the clamp is removed. Starting at either end to avoid edge scissors facing the glans, a small incision is made
June 1, 2020 ◆ Volume 101, Number 11 www.aafp.org/afp American Family Physician 683
NEWBORN CIRCUMCISION
684 American Family Physician www.aafp.org/afp Volume 101, Number 11 ◆ June 1, 2020
NEWBORN CIRCUMCISION
15. Perera CL, Bridgewater FH, Thavaneswaran P, et al. Safety and effi-
The Authors cacy of nontherapeutic male circumcision:a systematic review. Ann
Fam Med. 2010;8(1):6 4-72. Accessed January 22, 2020. http://w ww.
FOLASHADE OMOLE, MBChB, FAAFP, is the Sarah and William annfammed.org/content/8/1/64.long
Hambrecht Chair and Professor of the Department of Family 16. Yiee JH, Baskin LS. Penile embryology and anatomy. ScientificWorld-
Medicine at Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga. Journal. 2010;10:1 174-1179.
17. Hurwitz RS, Caldamone AA. Anatomic contraindications to circumci-
WALKITRIA SMITH, MD, is the associate program director for
sion. In:Bolnick DA, Koyle MA, Yosha A, eds. Surgical Guide to Circum-
the Family Medicine Residency Program, medical director of cision. Springer; 2012:33-43.
telemedicine, and assistant professor in the Department of
18. Morris BJ, Eley C. Male circumcision:an appraisal of current instru-
Family Medicine at Morehouse School of Medicine. mentation. Accessed January 22, 2020. https://w ww.intechopen.
com/books/biomedical-engineering-from-theory-to-applications/
KITTY CARTER-WICKER, MD, is the medical director of the
male-circumcision-an-appraisal-of-current-instrumentation
Clinical Skills Center and an associate professor in the Depart-
19. Yosha A, Bolnick DA. Newborn circumcision techniques. In:Bolnick DA,
ment of Family Medicine at Morehouse School of Medicine.
Koyle MA, Yosha A, eds. Surgical Guide to Circumcision. Springer;2012:
77-122.
Address correspondence to Folashade Omole, MB, ChB,
FAAFP, Morehouse School of Medicine, Department of Family 20. Krill AJ, Palmer LS, Palmer JS. Complications of circumcision. Scientific-
WorldJournal. 2011;1 1:2458-2468.
Medicine, 720 Westview Dr. SW, Atlanta, GA 30301 (email:
fomole@msm.edu). Reprints are not available from the 21. Holman JR, Lewis EL, Ringler RL. Neonatal circumcision techniques.
authors. Am Fam Physician. 1995;52(2):511-518, 519-520.
22. Peleg D, Steiner A. The Gomco circumcision:common problems and
solutions. Am Fam Physician. 1998;58(4):891-898. Accessed January
References 22, 2020. https://w ww.aafp.org/afp/1998/0915/p891.html
23. Al-Marhoon MS, Jaboub SM. Plastibell circumcision:how safe is it?:
1. Prabhakaran S, Ljuhar D, Coleman R, et al. Circumcision in the pae-
experience at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital. Sultan Qaboos Univ
diatric patient:a review of indications, technique and complications.
Med J. 2006;6(1):17-20.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2018;5 4(12):1 299-1307.
2. World Health Organization;Joint United Nations Programme on 24. Circumcision Information and Resource Pages. What happens during
HIV/AIDS. Neonatal and child male circumcision:a global review. circumcision? Accessed January 2, 2020. http://w ww.cirp.org/library/
2010. Accessed January 22, 2020. https://w ww.who.int/hiv/pub/ procedure/plastibell
malecircumcision/neonatal_child_MC_UNAIDS.pdf 25. Sinkey RG, Eschenbacher MA, Walsh PM, et al. The GoMo study:a ran-
3. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. Circum- domized clinical trial assessing neonatal pain with Gomco vs Mogen
cision policy statement. Pediatrics. 2012;1 30(3):585-586. clamp circumcision. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(5):664.e1-664.e8.
4. El Bcheraoui C, Zhang X, Cooper CS, et al. Rates of adverse events 26. Liu Y, Huang X, Luo B, et al. Effects of combined oral sucrose and non-
associated with male circumcision in U.S. medical settings, 2001 to nutritive sucking (NNS) on procedural pain of NICU newborns, 2001 to
2010. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(7):625-634. 2016:a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Medi-
5. Freedman A, Lerman S, Bergman J. Complications of circumcision. In: cine (Baltimore). 2017;96(6):e6108.
Bolnick DA, Koyle MA, Yosha A, eds. Surgical Guide to Circumcision. 27. Bellieni CV, Alagna MG, Buonocore G. Analgesia for infants’ circumci-
Springer; 2012:45-57. sion. Ital J Pediatr. 2013;39:38.
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Draft CDC recommenda- 28. Brady-Fryer B, Wiebe N, Lander JA. Pain relief for neonatal circumci-
tions for providers counseling male patients and parents regarding male sion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(4):CD004217.
circumcision and the prevention of HIV infection, STIs, and other health 29. Butler-O’Hara M, LeMoine C, Guillet R. Analgesia for neonatal circumci-
outcomes. Accessed January 22, 2020. https://w ww.cdc.gov/nchhstp/ sion:a randomized controlled trial of EMLA cream versus dorsal penile
newsroom/docs/factsheets/mc-factsheet-508.pdf nerve block. Pediatrics. 1998;101(4):E5.
7. American Academy of Family Physicians. Neonatal circumcision.
30. Sharara-Chami R, Lakissian Z, Charafeddine L, et al. Combination
Accessed January 22, 2020. https://w ww.aafp.org/about/policies/all/
analgesia for neonatal circumcision:a randomized controlled trial
neonatal-circumcision.html
[published correction appears in Pediatrics. 2018;141(5):e20180500].
8. Clark SJ, Kilmarx PH, Kretsinger K. Coverage of newborn and adult male Pediatrics. 2017;140(6):e20171935.
circumcision varies among public and private US payers despite health
31. Heras A, Vallejo V, Pineda MI, et al. Immediate complications of elective
benefits. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(12):2355-2361.
newborn circumcision. Hosp Pediatr. 2018;8(10):615-619.
9. Tobian AA, Gray RH. The medical benefits of male circumcision. JAMA.
2011;306(13):1479-1480. 32. Plank RM, Ndubuka NO, Wirth KE, et al. A randomized trial of Mogen
clamp versus Plastibell for neonatal male circumcision in Botswana.
10. Starzyk EJ, Kelley MA, Caskey RN, et al. Infant male circumcision:
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;62(5):e131-e137.
healthcare provider knowledge and associated factors. PLoS One.
2015;10(1):e0115891. 33. Arkovitz MS. Circumcision. In:Ziegler MM, Azizkhan RG, von Allmen D,
11. Morris BJ, Kennedy SE, Wodak AD, et al. Early infant male circumcision: et al., eds. Operative Pediatric Surgery. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Education;
systematic review, risk-benefit analysis, and progress in policy. World 2014:63.
J Clin Pediatr. 2017;6(1):89-102. 34. Abdulwahab-Ahmed A, Mungadi IA. Techniques of male circumcision.
12. Morris BJ, Bailis SA, Wiswell TE. Circumcision rates in the United States: J Surg Tech Case Rep. 2013;5(1):1-7.
rising or falling? What effect might the new affirmative pediatric policy 35. Sorokan ST, Finlay JC, Jefferies AL;Canadian Paediatric Society, Fetus
statement have? Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89(5):677-686. and Newborn Committee, Infectious Diseases and Immunization Com-
13. Kacker S, Frick KD, Gaydos CA, et al. Costs and effectiveness of neona- mittee. Newborn male circumcision. Paediatr Child Health. 2015;20(6):
tal male circumcision. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(10):910-918. 311-320.
14. Earp BD. Do the benefits of male circumcision outweigh the risks? 36. Christakis DA, Harvey E, Zerr DM, et al. A trade-off analysis of routine
A critique of the proposed CDC guidelines. Front Pediatr. 2015;3:18. newborn circumcision. Pediatrics. 2000;105(1 pt 3):246-249.
June 1, 2020 ◆ Volume 101, Number 11 www.aafp.org/afp American Family Physician 685