PT.

MITRA NELA LESTARI

Branch Office : Jl. Pelita Gg. Nusa Indah, 09, Rintis, Lima Puluh, Kota Pekanbaru, Riau 28141
Phone : 0812 6141 5500 Email : info@[Link]

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PROCEDURE

TITLE : MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE

(Yoke – Wet Particle Non Fluorescent Technique)
PROCEDURE NO : [Link]-01
REVISION : 3
DATE : Jan 25, 2021

Name Designation Signature

Prepared By: NDT Level II

Management
Acknowledge By :
Representative

Reviewed and ASNT Level III

Approved By: No : ASNT#126596
 TECNHICAL SPECIFICATION

PROCEDURE
DOCUMENT NUMBER: REV: PAGE: ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE: REVISION DATE:
3 1 of 13 December 3, 2008 JAN 25, 2021

TITLE: MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE

(Yoke – Wet Particle Non Fluorescent Technique)

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Descriptions
- COVER PAGE

- TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 SCOPE

2 REFERENCES

3 PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION

4 EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS

5 SURFACE PREPARATION

6 EXAMINATION ENVIRONMENT & VIEWING CONDITIONS

7 EXAMINATION PROCEDURE

7.1 METHOD OF EXAMINATION

DIRECTION OF MAGNETIZATION AND FIELD ADEQUACY
7.2
VERIFICATION
8 PROVE UP OF INDICATIONS

9 ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS
EXAMINATION OF AREAS FROM WHICH IMPERFECTION HAVE BEEN
10
REMOVED
11 RE-EXAMINATION OF REPAIRED AREA

12 DEMAGNETIZATION

13 POST EXAMINATION CLEANING

14 EXAMINATION REPORT

15 SAFETY PRECAUTIONS

ATTACHMENT 1 YOKE MAGNETIC LIFTING POWER VERIFICATION

ATTACHMENT 2 MAGNETIZATION TECHNIQUE

ATTACHMENT 3 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

ATTACHMENT 4 MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION REPORT (SAMPLE FORM)

 TECNHICAL SPECIFICATION

PROCEDURE
DOCUMENT NUMBER: REV: PAGE: ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE: REVISION DATE:
3 2 of 13 December 3, 2008 JAN 25, 2021

TITLE: MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE

(Yoke – Wet Particle Non Fluorescent Technique)

[Link]
1.1 This procedure provides a system of general conditions as an aid to personnel required to
performing fluorescent wet magnetic particle examination with continuous method employing
alternating current (AC) electromagnetic yoke techniques
1.2 This procedure is primarily prepared for detection of surface discontinuities on test accessible
surface of Ferromagnetic test material.
1.3 The components and welds to be examined shall be According to API-Spec 6A and API-Spec 16A
requirements, 100% of all pressure containing fabrication welds and weld overlay of ferromagnetic
materials for PSL 2 or equipments shall be examined by magnetic particle methods after all
welding, post-weld heat treatment and machining operations are completed. All repair welds shall
be examined by the same magnetic particle testing method and acceptance criteria as used for
examining the weld metal and base metal.
1.4 Examinations shall include 13 mm (1/2 in) of adjacent base metal on all sides of the weld.
1.5 The locations of weld metal overlay where magnetic particle testing shall be done are Ring
grooves, Stems, Valve bore sealing mechanism and Choke trim. The locations of weld metal
corrosion-resistant alloy overlay where magnetic particle testing shall be done are bodies, bonnets
and end and outlet connections.
1.6 All accessible well fluid wetted surfaces and all accessible sealing surfaces of each finished part
shall be inspected after final heat treatment and after final machining operations
1.7 The materials, shapes, or sizes to be examined and the extent of the examination shall be as
specified by Work Order, Customer Requirements, NDE Map or other control features

[Link]
2.1. ASTM E709 Standard Guide for Magnetic Particle Examination
2.2. API-Spec 6A 21st Edition Specification for Wellhead and Christmas Tree Equipment
2.3. API-Spec 16A 4th Edition Specification for Drill Through Equipment
2.4. API-Spec 7-1 First Edition specification for rotary Drill Stem Elements
2.5. Recommended Practice SNT-TC-1A (2020), Personnel Qualification and Certification in
Nondestructive Testing

[Link] QUALIFICATION
3.1. All personnel carry out Magnetic Particle Examination under this procedure shall be qualified and
certified in accordance with PT. Saka Tehnik Utama NDE Personnel Qualification & Certification
Procedure Doc No.: [Link].005 which is in compliance with SNT-TC-1A 2020 Edition.
3.2. The examiner shall have an annual vision test with correction if necessary, to enable him/she to
read a Jaeger no. J2 standard chart at a distance of not less than 305 mm (12 inches). He shall be
capable of distinguishing and differentiating contrast between colours used.
3.3. If required, the examiner shall demonstrate the satisfaction of Client that he is able to meet the
requirements of this procedure prior to being allowed to examine production pieces
4. EQUIPMENTS AND MATERIAL
4.1 Magnetizing Equipment
 TECNHICAL SPECIFICATION

PROCEDURE
DOCUMENT NUMBER: REV: PAGE: ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE: REVISION DATE:
3 3 of 13 December 3, 2008 JAN 25, 2021

TITLE: MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE

(Yoke – Wet Particle Non Fluorescent Technique)

Equipment to be used under this procedure shall be’

- Alternating Current Electromagnetic Yoke with articulated legs (poles)
4.2 Magnetic Particle field indicator (Burmah castrol or Pie Shape, Berth Hole)
4.3 Lifting Power calibrated weight
4.4 150 mm and 300 mm stainless steel rulers, measuring tapes and marker
4.5 Visible light meter (lux-meter)
4.6 Black light meter
4.7 Gause meter (if required)
4.8 Infrared thermometer or Surface thermocouple with temperature indicator
4.9 Material / Examination Medium
The finally divided ferromagnetic particles used for this examination shall be wet non
fluorescent. The following material should be used in this procedure:
White Contrasting Wet Non Cleaner /
Manufacturer Temp. Range
Paint fluorescent Bath Remover

MAGNAFLUX WCP-2 7HF SKC-S 10˚C – 70˚C

OIKOSH M-47 I-72 C-36 10˚C – 70˚C

Other equivalent materials may be used

4.10 Calibration or verification of equipment
4.10.1 The magnetizing force of the yoke shall be calibrated by determining their lifting power.
4.10.2 The magnetizing equipment shall be calibrated done on half-yearly basis, or whenever
the equipment had been subjected to major electrical repair periodic overhaul or
damage.
4.10.3 If equipment has not been used for half years or more, calibration shall be done prior to
first use;
4.10.4 When yokes are used, its shall be check every working day before used by showing
ability to lift applicable / required calibrated weight and recorded using form attachment
1
4.10.5 Each alternating current electromagnetic yoke shall have a lifting power of at least 10 lb.
(4.5 kg) at the maximum pole spacing that will be used.
4.10.6 Visible Light shall be verified by using the calibrated Visible Light Meter (Lux Meter)
4.10.7 Black Light shall be verified by using the calibrated Black Light Meter
 TECNHICAL SPECIFICATION

PROCEDURE
DOCUMENT NUMBER: REV: PAGE: ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE: REVISION DATE:
3 4 of 13 December 3, 2008 JAN 25, 2021

TITLE: MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE

(Yoke – Wet Particle Non Fluorescent Technique)

5. SURFACE PREPARATION
5.1. Weld overlay examination surface shall be of machined finished and or wire brushed prior to MPI
test is performed.
5.2. A visual examination of test surface shall be done prior to testing for any surface irregularities like
dents or cuts which might produce a non-relevant indication during testing.
5.3. The test surface shall be free of any impurities such as oil, grease, painting layer etc. which might
produce false indication during testing.
5.4. Surface preparation by grinding or machining may be necessary where surface irregularities
could mask discontinuities indications by false indications.
5.5. Cleaning shall be accomplished using detergents, organic solvents, de-scaling solutions, paint
removers, sand or water blasting.
5.1 Temperature on the surface of the part to be examined shall be within 60 degrees Fahrenheit to
125 degrees Fahrenheit. This shall be verified by the use of a calibrated infrared thermometer.

6. EXAMINATION ENVIRONMENT & VIEWING CONDITIONS

6.1 Nonfluorescent light intensity for examination – magnetic indications found using nonfluorescent
particles are examined under visible light
6.2 The intensity of ambient visible light at the surface of the part/work piece undergoing
nonfluorescent particle examination to be a minimum of 100 foot candles (1000 lux)
6.3 The field examinations using nonfluorescent particles, visible light intensities as low as 50 foot
canldes (500 lux) my be used if agreed with customer or by the contracting agency.
6.4 Surface Contrast Enhancement
Nonmagnetic surface contrasts may be applied by the examiner to uncoated surfaces, only in
amounts sufficient to enhance particle contrast. When nonmagnetic surface contrast
enhancement is used, it shall be demonstrated that indications can be detected through the
enhancement. After surface preparation in accordance with Par. 5, shake the contrasting paint to
ensure uniform distribution of particles. Apply a uniform thin film of the contrasting paint to the test
surface. Wait at least 15 seconds to allow the contrasting paint film to dry.

7. EXAMINATION PROCEDURE
7.1. Method of Examination
7.1.1. Examination shall be done by the continuous method; that is, wet magnetic particles
applied from aerosol spray cans shall be applied after the magnetizing current is applied.
Accumulation of excess particles during examination shall be removed by blowing or other
 TECNHICAL SPECIFICATION

PROCEDURE
DOCUMENT NUMBER: REV: PAGE: ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE: REVISION DATE:
3 5 of 13 December 3, 2008 JAN 25, 2021

TITLE: MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE

(Yoke – Wet Particle Non Fluorescent Technique)

source of low pressure dry air. The examination current or power shall be maintained
while removing the excess particles. Observe any indications formed.
7.1.2. see attachment 2 Magnetization Technique
7.2. Direction of Magnetization and Field Adequacy Verification
7.2.1. Weld Parts
At least two separate examinations shall be performed on each area. In any case, the
yoke’s pole spacing shall not be less than 3 inch nor exceed the spacing verified during
lifting power check
All examinations shall be conducted with sufficient overlap to assure 100% coverage at the
required sensitivity.
Verification of magnetic field direction and adequacy due to reduction of contact surface
between the yoke leg and the part, Burmah Castrol Strip or Pie Field Indicator shall be
used. Attach one flux indicator on the part surface under examination so that its length is at
right angles to the direction of the applied flux. Magnetize the work piece by the use of the
same pole spacing and contact area as the ones to be used for the examination. The
magnetization time shall not be less than 3 seconds. While the work piece is being
magnetized apply the magnetic particles. It is essential that the application of magnetic
particles stops before the end of magnetization. The direction and field adequacy of the
induced magnetic field is seen readily from the response of the flux indicators. The exact
direction can be checked by re-orientating the indicators with respect to the direction of the
field. A clear indication on Field Indicator in desired direction shall verify the adequacy of
magnetic field
The yoke may overheat if energized for a long period. Indication of unit overheating is if the
unit becomes too warm to hold comfortably. Normal operation is intermittent, with a
maximum “on” time of 80 seconds.
7.2.2. Parts Other than Weld
The whole areas between the yoke’s poles and 50 mm on either side of the axis of the
yoke pole will be the “area of interest” during each yoke shot. Maintain the yoke energized
for at least 3 seconds while the wet particles are still wetting the surface. Any particle
application shall cease before the source of the magnetizing current is removed.
Accumulation of excess particles shall be removed by blowing or other source of low
pressure dry air. The magnetizing current shall be maintained while removing the
excess particles. Repeat the above mentioned technique and continue to move the yoke
with overlap not more than 100 mm throughout the whole area to be examined. Mark any
relevant indications found using indelible markers.
After the steps above have been completed, turn the yoke right angle to its previous
orientation and repeat the steps above throughout the whole area to be examined.

8. PROVE UP OF INDICATIONS
8.1. Interpretation of tested area shall be done immediately after yoke magnetization and particle
application
8.2. Prior to interpretation, required light adequacy shall be checked. NDT personnel shall have prior
knowledge of part configuration and feature of test part surface as checked visually which shall
be a criteria for interpretation of indications on surface
 TECNHICAL SPECIFICATION

PROCEDURE
DOCUMENT NUMBER: REV: PAGE: ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE: REVISION DATE:
3 6 of 13 December 3, 2008 JAN 25, 2021

TITLE: MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE

(Yoke – Wet Particle Non Fluorescent Technique)

8.3. Discontinuities are indicated by retention of the examination medium. However, localized surface
irregularities due to machining marks, magnetic permeability variations on interface of two
dissimilar part joining or of two different heat treated condition, at the edge of heat affected zones
or other surface condition may produce non relevant indications. Broad areas of particle
accumulation, which might mask indications from discontinuities, are prohibited, and such areas
shall be cleaned and re-examined.
8.4. Whenever doubtful indication appear, surface reconditioning is required in the area being
considered. Light grinding or machining may be performed on the suspected area taking
consideration as not to exceed the dimensional tolerances of the part being examined. After
surface reconditioning has been done, repeat the magnetic particle examination on that area and
observe any indications found.
8.5. Broadly, material discontinuity indication can be defined in three main categories as described
here under :
1. Relevant Indication : Only those indications with major dimensions
greater than 1/16 shall be considered relevant.
2. Linear Indication : Any Indication in which the length is greater than three
times its width.
3. Rounded Indication : Any indication is one of circular or elliptical shape with
length equal to or less than three times its width.
4. Inherent Indication : A non-relevant indication not associated with a
surface rupture (e.g. magnetic permeability variations,
non-metallic stringers)
8.6. If indications are deemed to be non-relevant, they shall be examined by liquid penetrant methods,
or removed and re-inspected, to prove their non-relevant.
8.7. NDT personnel, whenever required, shall confirm indications nature and its extent by re-
examination on further surface conditioning or by using other NDT techniques.

9. ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS
9.1. These acceptance standards shall apply unless other more restrictive standards are specified for
specific materials or applications by client.
9.2. Standards of acceptance criteria shall comply with the limitation on defect defined in Attachment
3

10. EXAMINATION OF AREAS FROM WHICH IMPERFECTION HAVE BEEN REMOVED

Upon request, the area in which the defect has been removed (prior to making any repairs) shall be
re-examined in accordance with this procedure to ensure that the defect has been removed or
reduced to an acceptable size of imperfection.

11. RE-EXAMINATION OF REPAIRED AREA

 TECNHICAL SPECIFICATION

PROCEDURE
DOCUMENT NUMBER: REV: PAGE: ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE: REVISION DATE:
3 7 of 13 December 3, 2008 JAN 25, 2021

TITLE: MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE

(Yoke – Wet Particle Non Fluorescent Technique)

After the repair is completed and the surface has been smoothly finished, the re-examination of
repaired area shall be performed in accordance with this procedure

12. DEMAGNETIZATION
Unless specified in the contract documents, demagnetization is not necessary to be done. If the part
is to be heat-treated after examination, it is also not necessary to conduct demagnetization of the part
previously examined.

In cases where demagnetization is specified, the AC yoke shall be used to obtain a satisfactory level
of demagnetization. As applied in the initial examination, demagnetization is accomplished by placing
the part across the poles while the current is flowing and slowly withdrawing it from the field to a
distance of at least 18 inches before turning the magnetizing current off.

13. POST EXAMINATION CLEANING

Unless directed otherwise by the contracting documents, all parts and objects that have been
examined by magnetic particle method are not necessary to be cleaned. When required by the
contracting document, post examination cleaning should be conducted as soon as practical using a
process that doesn’t adversely affect the part. Typical post examination cleaning employed are:
- Drying of wet particles and subsequent removal by brushing or with compressed air.
- Removal of wet particles by flushing with chlorine free and volatile solvents

14. EXAMINATION REPORT

Examination result shall be recorded; Rejectable indications as a minimum, the type of indications,
location and extent (length or diameter or aligned) shall be stated on the examination reports.
Report of examination shall be made after completion of each examination. Evaluation of Magnetic
Particle Examination shall be reported on Magnetic Particle Examination Report Attachment 4
Magnetic Particle Examination Report shall contain the following information:
a) Identification/Description of item subjected to MT
b) Batch/Serial No./Weld No./Welder ID ,as applicable.
c) Reference Test Procedure No.
d) Signature of the MT inspector performing & evaluating indications.
e) Name of the Client/Project, the test part belonging.
f) Result of Examinations and location of defects, if any.
g) Date of Test and applicable witness, if any.
The record shall be stored for minimum 5 (five) years unless otherwise stated in the contracting
documents.

15. SAFETY AND MAINTENANCE

 TECNHICAL SPECIFICATION

PROCEDURE
DOCUMENT NUMBER: REV: PAGE: ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE: REVISION DATE:
3 8 of 13 December 3, 2008 JAN 25, 2021

TITLE: MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE

(Yoke – Wet Particle Non Fluorescent Technique)

15.1. AC Electromagnetic yoke shall be checked for any damage or malfunction, mainly to protect the
technician from any electrical shock hazard and also proper functioning of the yoke.
15.2. AC yoke equipment shall have proper earth connection in the circuit. AC yoke switch areas shall
be properly guarded with an insulating cover. NDT Technicians shall have knowledge that
unguarded switch operation by wet hand can generate electric shock.
15.3. AC yoke hand area which comes in contact with the test surface shall remain sufficiently flat to
induce proper magnetization. In case the contact area becomes curved on repeated usage, the
yoke shall be checked for the lifting capacity for sustained period with designated lifting block.
15.4. AC yoke cables shall be checked for any damage or leakage prior to its use.
15.5. AC yoke cable shall not be used for lifting or lowering the yoke which might cause damage of
the wire.
15.6. AC Yoke switch shall not be kept ‘ON’ for a prolonged period. A general convention is that yoke
switch shall be ‘ON’ for 3 seconds followed by 10 seconds ‘OFF’ for long term life requirement
of yoke.
15.7. MPI chemicals shall be avoided for any physical contact which might cause skin irritation.
During MPI white contrast paint spraying it is always desirable to avoid inhaling the paint dust.
During testing in enclosed area, wearing a nose guard and exhaust air flow is recommended.
15.8. Prior to use of MPI chemicals in aerosol cans, Technicians shall check and verify the certificate
of conformance (COC) as issued by manufacturer for specified Batch No. and the current
validity of the chemicals as printed on cans and the certificates.
15.9. Care shall be exercised during examination relatively toxic and highly flammable
[Link] hazards like opened electrical wire from lighting source or magnetizing equipment and
the presence of short circuiting medium shall be treated with care
[Link]'s directions shall be followed at all times
[Link] is prohibited while performing magnetic particle examination
[Link] Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for each magnetic particle materials shall be consulted in
determining the proper method for the disposal of used pressurized spray cans and liquid
residue waste
 TECNHICAL SPECIFICATION

PROCEDURE
DOCUMENT NUMBER: REV: PAGE: ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE: REVISION DATE:
3 9 of 13 December 3, 2008 JAN 25, 2021

TITLE: MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE

(Yoke – Wet Particle Non Fluorescent Technique)

Attachment 1: Yoke Magnetic Lifting Power Verification

YOKE MAGNETIC CALIBRATION
LIFTING POWER / STRENGTH VERIFICATION RECORD

REFERENCE
CODE/STANDARD/PROCEDURE:

CALIBRATOR I.D. NO.: WEIGHT lb / kg

VERIVIED POLE
YOKE
DATE / SPACING TECHNICIAN
BRAND / TYPE SERIAL NO.
TIME MAX SIGNATURE
Inch / mm

SAMPLE
FORM

REMARK:
 TECNHICAL SPECIFICATION

PROCEDURE
DOCUMENT NUMBER: REV: PAGE: ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE: REVISION DATE:
3 10 of 13 December 3, 2008 JAN 25, 2021

TITLE: MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE

(Yoke – Wet Particle Non Fluorescent Technique)

Attachment 2: Magnetization Technique

Example of an area to be examined (shadowed area) by yoke magnetization

Typical techniques of yoke magnetization

Figure 1 –Yoke Placement and Orientation for Detection of Flaws

[Dimensions in mm]
 TECNHICAL SPECIFICATION

PROCEDURE
DOCUMENT NUMBER: REV: PAGE: ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE: REVISION DATE:
3 11 of 13 December 3, 2008 JAN 25, 2021

TITLE: MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE

(Yoke – Wet Particle Non Fluorescent Technique)

Attachment 3: Acceptance Criteria

A. Acceptance Criteria, as applicable, shall be based on API -6A (21 st edition) requirements:

1. All accessible wetted and sealing surfaces of finished part:

a) No relevant linear indications
b) No relevant rounded indication with a major dimension equal to or greater than 5 mm (3/16)
c) No more than ten relevant indication in any continuous 40 cm2 ( 6 in2 ) area.
d) No Four or More relevant indications in a line separated by less than 1.6 mm(1/16) (edge to edge) are
unacceptable
e) No relevant indications on pressure contact sealing surfaces
2. Pressure Containing Welds. Welds on Pad-eyes /Lifting Devices and Weld Overlay
a) No relevant linear indications.
b) No relevant rounded indication with a major dimension equal to or greater than 5 mm (3/16)
c) No Four or More relevant indications in a line separated by less than 1.6 mm(1/16) (edge to edge) are
unacceptable
d) No relevant indications on pressure contact sealing surfaces
e) No rounded indications greater than 3 mm (1/8) for welds whose depth is 16 mm (5/8) or less; or 5 mm (3/16)
for welds whose depth is greater than 16 mm (5/8) .
3. Repair Welds
a) The same acceptance criteria used in examining the base material or weld will be used
b) All repair works shall be performed in accordance with the same controls followed for the initial work.
B. Acceptance Criteria, as applicable, shall be based on API-Spec 16A (4 th Edition) requirements:

1. All pressure contact (metal-to-metal) sealing surfaces:

a) No relevant indications in the pressure contact (metal-to-metal) sealing surfaces is allowed
2. Surfaces other than pressure contact (metal-to-
metal) sealing surfaces:
a) No relevant indication with a major dimension equal to or greater than 5 mm (3/16)
b) No more than ten relevant indications in any continuous 40 cm2 (6 in2 ) area
c) Four or More relevant indications in a line separated by less than 1.6 mm(1/16) (edge to edge) are unacceptable
3. All pressure containing welds, repair and weld
metal overlays
a) Acceptance criteria shall be same as above requirements for Pressure contacting surface and non-pressure
contacting surface Also, in addition liquid penetrant examination shall reveal:
b) No rounded indications greater than 3 mm (0.125) for welds whose depth is 16 mm (0.63) or less; or 5 mm
(0.2) for welds whose depth is greater than 16 mm (0.63) .

C. Acceptance Criteria, as applicable, shall be based on API-Spec 7-1 First Edition requirements
(Drill colar surface imperfection removal and inspection reference standard notch depth) :
Outside diameter Stock removal from surface max Reference standard notch depth max
Over 63.5 to 88.9 inclusive 1.83 1.83
Over 88.9 to 114.3 inclusive 2.29 2.29
Over 114.3 to 139.7 inclusive 2.79 2.79
Over 139.7 to 165.1 inclusive 3.18 3.18
Over 165.1 to 209.6 inclusive 3.94 3.94
Over 209.6 to 241.3 inclusive 5.16 5.16
Over 241.3 12.19 6.10
 TECNHICAL SPECIFICATION

PROCEDURE
DOCUMENT NUMBER: REV: PAGE: ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE: REVISION DATE:
3 12 of 13 December 3, 2008 JAN 25, 2021

TITLE: MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE

(Yoke – Wet Particle Non Fluorescent Technique)

Attachment 4: MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION REPORT

REPORT NO.: DATE: Page of

CLIENT:

LOCATION: PROJECT:

ITEM / EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION:

MT PROCEDURE STANDARD OF STANDARD OF COMPANY
DATE ISSUED OTHER
NO. METHODE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA DRAWING No

Pre-examination
Surface Preparation:
Pre Cleaning:
Visible Light Intensity: Lx; Black Light Intensity: W/Cm2
Equipment Examination Medium
- Brand Name : - Brand Name :
- Type/Model : - Type :
- Serial No. : - Bath or Lot Number :
Other:

Method of Examination
 Dry  Wet  Visible  Fluorescent
How media applied:
 Residual  Continuous
 AC  DC  HWDC  Permanent Magnet
 Prod  Yoke  Cable Wrap  Other
Direction for Field  Circular  Longitudinal
Field Strength :
Magnetization time :
Post Examination
Demagnetizing Technique :
Cleaning :
Marking Method :
Weld / Indication No. & Interpretation
No Test Specimen Identification Location Accept. Reject. Remark

SAMPLE FORM

Inspected by Reviewed / Approved by Approved by

Technician Approved by

Date Date Date Date