RECOMMENDED SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION

Name of the Laboratory: RADHEY TESTING & CONSULTANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,Firozabad Date(s) of Assessment :15 May 2023 - 16 May 2023

Discipline: Mechanical

Component, *Test Method

parameter or
characteristic Specification +Measurement
Materials or tested/ against which Range of Uncertainty Assessment
Sl Products Specific Test tests are Testing/ Limits expressed as Test Status Technique Remarks
performed Performed at
tested Performed/ and/or the of detection (±) at Used
Tests or type techniques/ Observed Value
of tests
performed equipment used

Assessed BY :A Ravi

Location :Location 1

Discipline: Mechanical Group: Mechanical Properties of Metals Sub Group: Ferrous materials, alloys & products

IS 278 does not

defined
appropriate test
method for
Barbed wire / 0.2 mm @ 9.6 measurement of
1 Diameter IS: 278 : 2009 1 mm to 12 mm PermanentFacility Inadequate barbed wire
fencing wire mm diameter .Also
lab does not
have method
validation record
for the same

IS 1786 is not
an appropriate
2 Barbed wire / Mass of wire IS: 1786: 2008 50 g/m to 300 2.2 g/m @ 91.3 PermanentFacility Inadequate test method for
fencing wire g/m g/m mass of barbed
wire & fencing
wire

Tensile testing
was
Adequate demonstrated
3 Barbed wire / Tensile Strength IS: 1608(Part-1): 50 N/mm2 to 1.2 N/mm2 @ PermanentFacility Adequate through File for HT strand
fencing wire 2022 500 N/mm2 91.3 N/mm2 Review (Record wire as per
Review) similar test
method by lab
personnel

4 Barbed wire / Wrapping test IS: 1755: 2018 Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
fencing wire Witness

MBCB / Ferrous Qualitative Adequate Reviewed earlier

5 Materials & a Bend test IS: 1599: 2019 :Mandrel size - N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through File
Review (Record performed
test
loys products 6mm, 8mm, record
Structural Steel 10mm Review)

MBCB / Ferrous Qualitative IS 7438 is not

Materials & a :Mandrel size - an appropriate
6 Bend Test IS:7438: 2016 N/A PermanentFacility Inadequate
loys products 6mm, 8mm, test method for
Structural Steel 10mm bend test

MBCB / Ferrous Adequate

Materials & a IS: 1608 (Part- through File Reviewed earlier
7 loys products Elongation 1): 2022 10 % to 50 % 1.2 % @ 24 % PermanentFacility Adequate Review (Record performed test
Structural Steel Review) record

IS 2062 is a
product
specification for
structural
[Link] does not
describe the
test method for
MBCB / Ferrous thickness
Materials & a IS: 2062(Clause 5 mm to 300 1.6 mm @ 100 PermanentFacility measurement
8 loys products Thickness 15): 2011 mm mm Inadequate (Eg : Type of
Structural Steel measuring
device,
accuracy
level).Also lab
does not have
 method
validation record
for the same

MBCB / Ferrous Adequate

Materials & a IS: 1608 (Part- 100 N/mm2 to 4 N/mm2 @ 436 through File Reviewed earlier
9 loys products Yield stress 1): 2022 PermanentFacility Adequate Review (Record performed test
700 N/mm2 N/mm2 record
Structural Steel Review)

IS 2062 is a
product
specification for
structural
[Link] does not
describe the
MBCB / Ferrous test method for
Materials & a Cross sectional IS: 2062(Clause 10 mm2 to 2500 5 mm2 @ 1555 cross sectional
10 loys products area 15): 2021 PermanentFacility Inadequate area (Eg : Type
mm2 mm2 of measuring
Structural Steel
device,
accuracy
level).Also lab
does not have
method
validation record
for the same

Range of testing
for HRC is found
inappropriate
MBCB / Ferrous w.r.t IS 1586 -
Materials & a Rockwell IS: 1586(Part- 1) 5 HRC to 100 2 HRC @ 50 Part
11 loys products hardness : 2018 HRC HRC PermanentFacility Inadequate requirements. It
Structural Steel defined from 5
HRC to 100
HRC in applied
scope

Tensile testing
MBCB / Ferrous Adequate of HT strand
wire was
12 Materials & a Ultimate Tensile IS: 1608(Part- 100 N/mm2 to 5 N/mm2 @ 558 PermanentFacility Adequate through File demonstrated
loys products Strength 1): 2022 700 N/mm2 N/mm2 Review (Record
Structural Steel Review) by lab personnel
as per same
test method

Discipline: Mechanical Group: Mechanical Properties of Metals Sub Group: Others

Test method for

wire diameter
measurement
(Eg : Type of
Prestressing measuring
Strands H.T IS: 0.3 mm @ 2.5 device,
13 Strands /LRPC Diameter 14268(Annexure 1 mm to 20 mm mm PermanentFacility Inadequate accuracy level)
A- 2): 2022 is not defined in
Strands IS [Link]
lab does not
have method
validation record
for the same

Prestressing
IS:
Strands H.T Mass / unit area 14268(Annexure Test/Calibration
14 Strands /LRPC 0.1 kg to 15 kg 0.1 kg @ 9.6 kg PermanentFacility Adequate Witness
Strands B- 2/A-2): 2022

Prestressing
StrandsH.T IS: 1608(Part- 1) 100 kN to 500 1.4 kN @ 233 Test/Calibration
15 Strands /LRPC Breaking load : 2022 kN kN PermanentFacility Adequate Witness
Strands

Prestressing
16 StrandsH.T Cross sectional IS: 14268 : 2022 30 mm2 to 360 2.3 mm2 @ 168 PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
Strands /LRPC area mm2 mm2 Witness
Strands

Lab does not

have adequate
facility for
Prestressing IS: correct
StrandsH.T Relaxation test 2.8 kN @ 970 performance of
17 Strands /LRPC 100 H 14268(Clause 1 kN to 2000 kN kN PermanentFacility Inadequate relaxation test
6.2.4): 2022
Strands of HT strand
wire as per IS
14268
requirements
 Range of HRB
is found
[Link]
18 Reinforcement Rockwell IS: 1586(Part- 5 HRB to 100 2 HRB @ 50 PermanentFacility Inadequate was defined
steel bar hardness 1): 2018 HRB HRB from 5 HRB to
100HRB in
applied scope of
testing

Range of HRC
is found
[Link]
Reinforcement Rockwell IS: 1586(Part- 5 HRC to 100 2 HRC @ 60 was defined
19 steel bar hardness 1): 2018 HRC HRC PermanentFacility Inadequate from 5 HRC to
100HRC in
applied scope of
testing

20 Steel Pipe Tube Flattening Test IS: 2328(Clause Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
6.1): 2018 Witness

Rockwell IS: 1586(Part- 1) 30 HRC to 100 4.0 HRC @ 60 Test/Calibration

21 Washer Hardness : 2018 HRC HRC PermanentFacility Adequate Witness

Discipline: Mechanical Group: Mechanical Properties of Metals Sub Group: Welds & welded test specimens

API 1104, Adequate

(Clause Qualitative facility is not
Ferrous/nonferrous, Bend Test- [Link])/ :Qualitative available to
22 alloys & N/A PermanentFacility Inadequate perform bend
products Face & Root ASME BPVC Mandrels: test as per API /
IX, QW 160: 8,10,12,16,20,25 ASME SEC IX
2019 requirements

Vickers
API 1104 hardness
Ferrous/nonferrous, (Clause 5.6.3)/ testing machine
23 alloys & Hardness ASME BPVC 4.98 HV10 to 2.0 HV10 @ PermanentFacility Inadequate is not available
products IX- QW172: 2971 HV10 828 HV10 to perform HV10
2019 as per applied
scope of testing

Charpy impact
testing machine
is not calibrated
as per ASTM
E23
requirements
API 1104 .NIST
Ferrous/nonferrous, Impact Test (Clause A.2)/ verification
24 alloys & ASME BPVC 10 J to 200 J 2.5 J @ 105 J PermanentFacility Inadequate report is not
products Charpy IX- QW171 : [Link]
2019 finish
measurement
device is not
available to
verify surface
finish of impact
test specimen

Adequate
facility and
samples are not
available to
API 1104 perform Nice
Ferrous/nonferrous, (Clause A.2)/ break test .Also
25 alloys & Nick Break ASME BPVC 1.0 KN to 500 0.42 KN @ 18.7 PermanentFacility Inadequate earlier
products IX- QW150: KN KN performed test
2019 report is not
available to
ensure
competence of
lab personnel

Similar type of
test
demonstrated
by lab as per
Ferrous/nonferrous, API 1104 Adequate BIS
(Clause 5.6.2)/ 1.0 Â KN to 500 0.52 Â KN @ through File requirements for
26 alloys & Tensile Strength ASME BPVC IX PermanentFacility Adequate Review (Record HT strand wire
products  KN 25.5  KN
QW150: 2019 Review) .But latest
version of API
and ASME Sec
IX is not
available
 (Clause Adequate
Ferrous/nonferrous,Transverse Load [Link]), 20 KN to 6000 4.58 KN @ through File Reviewed earlier
27 alloys & Test RDSO manual KN 1200 KN PermanentFacility Adequate Review (Record performed test
products for Flash Butt: report
2019 Review)

Discipline: Mechanical Group: Sub Assembly/Ancillaries/Accessories Sub Group: Bearing

Bridge Bearings IRC 83(Part- 2) 0.5 N/mm2 to 0.23 N/mm2 @ PermanentFacility Test/Calibration
28 Shear Modulus (Clause Adequate
Elastomeric No.C.2): 2019 20 N/mm2 14.5 N/mm2 Witness

Range of testing
, Unit of
measurement
and MU is found
inappropriate for
compression
stiffness of
elasomer
bearing in
Elastic Test/Calibration
Bridge Bearings Modulus- IRC 83(Part- 2) 10 N/mm2 to 0.23 N/mm2 @ PermanentFacility Witness,Adequateapplied scope of
testing
29 Elastomeric Compression (Clause No - Adequate through File
C.3): 2018 125 N/mm2 98.6 N/mm2 Review (Record (Specified
Stiffness Review) Range of
Testing: 10
N/mm2 to 125
N/mm 2 .But
observed value :
905195
N/[Link]
refer NC raised
under
[Link].[Link]

Shear Bond is
mentioned as
test method for
elasomer
bearing in IRC -
83-Part 2,
Annexure C
Shear Test/Calibration .[Link] lab has
IRC 83(Part- 2)
Bridge Bearings BoundStripping/Adhesi Witness,Adequate mentioned
30 Elastomeric Strength-Bond (Clause No. 4): Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through File shear Bond
2018 Review (Record
Shear Strength Review) stripping/Adhesi
strength -Bond
shear strength
in applied scope
of testing -
Please refer NC
raised under
[Link].[Link]

Bridge Bearings
Elastomeric,Pot,
Pot- cum-PTFF, IRC 83(Part-3) Test/Calibration
31 Pin& Meta lic Rotation Test (Clause No. Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate Witness
Spherical & [Link]) : 2018
Cylindrical

Bridge Bearings
Elastomeric,Pot,
Pot- cum-PTFF, Proof Load Test- IRC 83(Part--3 & 20 kN to 5000 3.5 kN @ 3347 PermanentFacility Test/Calibration
32 Pin& Meta lic Vertical/Horizontal 4)(Clause No. kN kN Adequate Witness
Spherical & [Link]): 2018
Cylindrical, Ro
ler & Rocker

Bridge Bearings
Elastomeric,Pot,
Pot- cum-PTFF, IRC 83(Part--3 & Test/Calibration
33 Pin& Meta lic Friction Test 4) (Clause Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate Witness
Spherical & [Link]): 2018
Cylindrical,Ro
ler & Rocker

Assessed BY :Mada Pulla Reddy

Location :Location 1

Discipline: Mechanical Group: Buildings Materials Sub Group: Aggregates

Coarse IS: 2386 (Part- 0.65 % @ 20.14 PermanentFacility Adequate

34 Aggregate Crushing Value 4) : 1963 5 % to 60 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing
 Adequate
35 Coarse Elongation IS: 2386 (Part- 5 % to 60 % 1.2 % @ 19.57 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Aggregate Index 1): 1963 % Document
Review

Material Finer Adequate

36 Coarse than 75 micron IS: 2386 (Part- 2 % to 40 % 0.52 % @ 23.50 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Aggregate IS Sieve 1): 1963 % Interviewing

Coarse Water IS: 2386 (Part- 0.06 % @ 0.45 PermanentFacility Adequate

37 Aggregate Absorption 3): 1963 0.1 % to 30 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Coarse IS: 2386 (Part- 1.4 kN @ 218 Adequate

38 Aggregate 10% fines value 4): 1963 50 kN to 400 kN kN PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

This parameter
doesn't come
1.9 mili/moles under
39 Coarse Alkali Aggregate IS: 2386 (Part- 10 mili/moles to @ 95 PermanentFacility Inadequate mechanical
Aggregate Reactivity 7): 1963 500 mili/moles mili/moles discipline. So
not
recommending.

Coarse IS: 2386 (Part- 1.5 Kg/L to 3 0.1 Kg/L @ 1.7 PermanentFacility Adequate
40 Bulk Density Adequate through adequate
Aggregate 3): 1963 Kg/L Kg/L Interviewing

Deleterious Adequate
41 Coarse Materials (Clay IS: 2386 (Part- 0.1 % to 5.0 % 0.03 % @ 0.65 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Aggregate lumps) 2): 1963 % Interviewing

Coarse Petrographic IS: Adequate

42 Aggregate Examination 2386(Method-1, Qualitative N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Part- 8): 1963 Interviewing

Coarse Sieve Analysis IS: 2386 (Part- Adequate

43 Aggregate (80 mm to 1) : 1963 2 % to 100 % 0.62 % @ 40 % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
2.36mm) Interviewing

Coarse IS: 2386 (Part- Adequate

44 Aggregate Specific Gravity 3): 1963 1.5to 3 0.2@ 2.56 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Coarse Aggregate IS: 2386 (Part- 0.12 % @ 16.42 PermanentFacility Adequate

45 Aggregate Impact Value 4): 1963 5 % to 60 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Coarse Deleterious Adequate

46 Material (Coal & IS 2386 (Part-2): 0.1 % to 5 % 0.03 % @ 0.65 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Aggregate Lignite) 1963 % Interviewing

Coarse IS: 2386 (Part- 0.21 % @ 29.45 Adequate

47 Aggregate Flakiness Index 1): 1963 1 % to 40 % % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Adequate
48 Coarse Los Angeles IS 2386( Part 4) 5 % to 60 % 1.21 % @ 22.12 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Aggregate Abrasion Value : 1963 % Interviewing

Coarse Polished stone BS: 812 (Part- 1.65 % @ 58.34 PermanentFacility Adequate adequate NC
49 Aggregate value 114) : 2016 10 % to 80 % % Adequate through given
Interviewing

Coarse Polished stone IS: 2386 (Part- 1.65 % @ 58.34 PermanentFacility Adequate adequateNC
50 Aggregate value 4): 1963 10 % to 80 % % Adequate through given
Interviewing

Coarse Soundness by IS: 2386(Part- 0.05 % @ 3.49 PermanentFacility Adequate

51 Aggregate MgSO4 5): 1963 2 % to 30 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Coarse Soundness by IS: 2386 (Part- 0.2 % @ 2.56 Adequate

52 1 % to 3 % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Aggregate Na2SO4 5): 1963 % Interviewing

Coarse 1.42 % @ 98.60 Adequate

53 Aggregate Stripping Value IS: 6241: 1971 40 % to 100 % % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

This parameter
doesn't come
0.85 mili/moles under
54 Fine Aggregate Alkali Aggregate IS:2386 (Part-7):
Reactivity 1963
2 mili/moles to
500 mili/moles @ 94 PermanentFacility Inadequate mechanical
 mili/moles discipline. So
not
recommending.
IS: 2386 (Part- 1.5 Kg/L to 3 0.08 Kg/L @ 1.7 PermanentFacility Adequate
55 Fine Aggregate Bulk Density 3): 1963 Kg/L Kg/L Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Deleterious IS: 2386(Part- 0.03 % @ 0.65 PermanentFacility Adequate

56 Fine Aggregate Materials (Clay 2): 1963 0.1 % to 5.0 % % Adequate through adequate
lumps) Interviewing

57 Fine Aggregate Mortar Making IS: 2386(Part- 6) 0.1 % to 100 % 1.50 % @ 63 % PermanentFacility Inadequate Measuring units
Properties : 1963 are wrong

Petrographic IS: 2386 (Part- Adequate

58 Fine Aggregate Examination 8) (Method-1) Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
(CL-2.1): 1963 Interviewing

Sieve Analysis 0.56 % @ 88.42 Adequate

59 Fine Aggregate (10mm to 0.150 IS: 2386 (Part- 1 % to 100 % % Passing @ PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
mm) 1): 1963 4.75mm IS Interviewing
sieve

Deleterious Adequate
60 Fine Aggregate Material (Coal & IS 2386 (Part-2):
1963 0.1 % to 5 % 0.03 % @ 0.48 PermanentFacility
% Adequate through adequate
Lignite) Interviewing

Material finer IS 2386 (Part-1): 0.48 % @ 18.86 PermanentFacility Adequate

61 Fine Aggregate than 75 micron 1963 2 % to 40 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Adequate
62 Fine Aggregate SandValue
Equivalent IS: 2720 (Part-
37): 1976 10 % to 85 % 1.72 % @ 59.65 PermanentFacility
% Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

CPWD 0.3 % @ 2.80 Adequate

63 Fine Aggregate Silt Content Method,Appendix- 0.5 % to 10 % % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
D : 2000 Interviewing

Soundness by IS: 2386 (Part- 0.05 % @ 3.43 PermanentFacility Adequate

64 Fine Aggregate MgSO4 5): 1963 2 % to 30 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Soundness by IS: 2386 (Part- 0.05 % @ 3.43 PermanentFacility Adequate

65 Fine Aggregate Na2SO4 5): 1963 2 % to 30 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

IS: 2386 (Part- Adequate

66 Fine Aggregate Specific Gravity 3): 1963 2to 3 2.2@ 2.56 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Water IS: 2386 (Part- 0.14 % @ 11.22 PermanentFacility Adequate

67 Fine Aggregate 0.2 % to 25 % Adequate through adequate
Absorption 3): 1963 % Interviewing

Discipline: Mechanical Group: Buildings Materials Sub Group: Bitumen

Bitumen Penetration at 20 (1/10th of 1.8 (1/10th of Adequate

68 Emulsion 25 0 C/100g/5 IS: 1203: 2020 mm) to 350 mm) @ 56 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Sec. (1/10th of mm) (1/10th of mm) Interviewing

Bitumen Coagulation of Adequate

69 Emulsion emulsion @ low IS:8887(Annexure-
C): 2018 Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
temperature Interviewing

Bitumen Coating ability & IS:8887(Annexure- Adequate

70 Emulsion water resistance F): 2018 Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Distillation in %
Bitumen volume of ASTM D 244: 1.4 % @ 85.8 Adequate
71 Emulsion distillate 2000 10 % to 100 % % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
recovered at Interviewing
260°C

Distillation in %
Bitumen volume of 1.4 % @ 85.8 Adequate
72 Emulsion distillate IS: 1213: 2020 10 % to 100 % % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
recovered at Interviewing
360°C

Bitumen 20 cm to 100 0.06 cm @ 75 Adequate

73 Emulsion Ductility IS: 1208: 1978 cm cm PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Bitumen Marshall ASTM D-6927: 0.05 KN @ 4.5

74 Emulsion Stability 2016 1.5 KN to 25 KN KN PermanentFacility Inadequate Irrelevant test
Test/Calibration
75 Bitumen Particle charge IS:8887(Annexure- Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate Witness,Adequate compliance
Emulsion E): 2018 through
Interviewing

Adequate
76 Bitumen Residue by IS:8887(Annexure- 20 % to 100 % 0.89 % @ 63.5 PermanentFacility Adequate through compliance
Emulsion evaporation J): 2018 % Interviewing

Bitumen Residue on 600 IS:8887(Annexure- 0.01 % to 2 % 0.003 % @ 0.04 PermanentFacility Adequate

77 Emulsion micron IS sieve B): 2018 % Adequate through compliance
Interviewing

Bitumen Solubility in 1.2 % @ 97.5 Adequate

78 Emulsion trichloroethylene IS: 1216: 1978 20 % to 100 % % PermanentFacility Adequate through compliance
Interviewing

Bitumen Stability to IS:8887(Annexure- 1 % to 10 % Adequate

79 Emulsion mixing with G): 2018 0.2 % @ 9.0 % PermanentFacility Adequate through compliance
cement Interviewing

Bitumen Storage stability IS:8887(Annexure- 1 % to 5 % 0.22 % @ 2.9 Adequate

80 Emulsion after 24 hour D): 2018 % PermanentFacility Adequate through compliance
Interviewing

Bitumen Viscosity by IS:8887(Annexure- 10 Sec to 400 0.5 Sec @ 62.6 Adequate

81 Emulsion Sayboltfurol A): 2018 Sec Sec PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
viscometer Interviewing

Bitumen Adequate
82 Emulsion Water Content IS:1211: 2022 1 % to 60 % 0.2 % @ 2.5 % PermanentFacility Adequate through compliance
Interviewing

Bitumen Residue at 1.3 % @ 25.8 Adequate

83 Emulsion IS: 1213: 2020 30 % to 80 % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
(Cationic Type) 360°C % Interviewing

Bitumen Test/Calibration
84 Bituminous Mix Content / Binder ASTMD: 2172: 1 % to 10 % 0.04 % @ 5.04 PermanentFacility Adequate Witness,Adequate adequate
Content Test 2019 % through
Interviewing

Boiling Water ASTM D 3625: Adequate

85 Bituminous Mix Test 1996 Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

ASTM D 2726: 2.00 g/cc to 2.8 0.12 g/cc @ Adequate

86 Bituminous Mix Density 2021 g/cc 2.45 g/cc PermanentFacility Adequate through compliance
Interviewing

IS: 2386(Part-- 0.9 % @ 86.54 PermanentFacility Adequate

87 Bituminous Mix Gradation 1): 1963 20 % to 100 % % Adequate through compliance
Interviewing

ASTM D-6927: 0.1 mm @ 4.5 Adequate

88 Bituminous Mix Marshal Flow 2016 2 mm to 10 mm mm PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Marshal ASTM D-6927: 0.1 kN @ 4.5 Adequate

89 Bituminous Mix Stability 2016 0.5 kN to 25 kN kN PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

10 Hardness 10 Hardness Adequate

90 Bituminous Mix Mastic IS:1195: 2002 Number to 70 Number @ 20 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Hardness Hardness Hardness Interviewing
Number Number

Test/Calibration
91 Bituminous Mix Resilient ASTM D 4123: 300 N/mm2 to 7.5 N/mm2 @ PermanentFacility Adequate Witness,Adequate adequate
Modulus 1982 6000 N/mm2 3212 N/mm2 through
Interviewing

Resilient 300 N/mm2 to 7.5 N/mm2 @ Adequate

92 Bituminous Mix Modulus IRC: 37 : 2018 6000 N/mm2 3212 N/mm2 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Retained MORT&H(Appendix-5 % to 100 % 0.64 % @ 86.5 PermanentFacility Adequate

93 Bituminous Mix Marsha l 4) Spec: 2013 % Adequate through adequate
Stability Interviewing

Rutting Test of AASHTO-T 340: 0 mm to 15 mm 0.33 mm @ 5.7 PermanentFacility Adequate

94 Bituminous Mix Adequate through adequate
Asphalt Mix 2010 mm Interviewing
95 Paving Bitumen Absolute IS: 1206(Part-2) 360 Poise to 9 Poise @ 3312 PermanentFacility Adequate Adequate compliance
Viscosity at 2022: 2022 24000 Poise Poise through
60°C Interviewing
Adequate
96 Paving Bitumen Ductility TFOT IS: 1201 to 1220 0.05 m to 2.0 m 0.02 m @ 0.75 PermanentFacility Adequate through compliance
: 1978 m Interviewing

Solubility in 1.06 % @ 98.21 PermanentFacility Adequate

97 Paving Bitumen trichloroethylene IS: 1216: 1978 20 % to 100 % % Adequate through compliance
Interviewing

Adequate
98 Paving Bitumen Specific Gravity IS: 1202: 2021 0.5to 1.5 0.07@ 1.05 PermanentFacility Adequate through compliance
Interviewing

Viscosity Ratio IS: 1206(Part-- 50 Sec to 1200 2.1 Sec @ Adequate

99 Paving Bitumen at 60°C 2): 2022 Sec 788.3 Sec PermanentFacility Adequate through compliance
Interviewing

Flashpoint IS: 1448 Part-- 50 °C to 350 2.3 °C @ Adequate

100 Paving Bitumen (COC) 69 : 2019 °C 226 °C PermanentFacility Adequate through compliance
Interviewing

2.1 oC @ 218 Adequate

101 Paving Bitumen Flashpoint IS: 1209: 2021 50 oC to 350 oC oC PermanentFacility Adequate through compliance
Interviewing

Kinematic IS: 1206(Part-3): 150 Â cSt to 8.6 Â cSt @ Adequate

102 Paving Bitumen Viscosity at 2021 600 Â cSt 324 Â cSt PermanentFacility Adequate through compliance
135°C Interviewing

10 1/10th of 2 1/10th of mm Adequate

103 Paving Bitumen Penetration IS: 1203: 2022 mm to 350 @ 62 1/10th of PermanentFacility Adequate through compliance
1/10th of mm mm Interviewing

1.3 oC @ 56.8 Adequate

104 Paving Bitumen Softening Point IS: 1205: 2022 15 oC to 80 oC oC PermanentFacility Adequate through compliance
Interviewing

IS:1448(Part- 10 °C to 50 0.39 °C @ Adequate

105 Paving Bitumen Pour Point 10/Sec-1): 2021 °C 44.2 °C PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Polymer Elastic recovery IS: Adequate

106 Modified of half thread in 15462(Annex 72 % to 90 % 0.32 % @ 77 % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Bitumen ductilometer at A): 2019 Interviewing
15°C

Polymer Frass Breaking -0.32 oC @ -15 PermanentFacility Adequate

107 Modified Point IS: 9381: 1979 0 oC to -40 oC oC Adequate through adequate
Bitumen Interviewing

Polymer 0.06 % @ 1.13 PermanentFacility Adequate

108 Modified Loss in mass IS: 9382: 1979 0.5 % to 10 % % Adequate through adequate
Bitumen Interviewing

Polymer 0.04 % @ 5.04 PermanentFacility

109 Modified Loss in weight IS: 9382: 1979 0.01 % to 10 % % Inadequate test repeated
Bitumen

Polymer Mineral Matter 0.30 % @ 6.70 PermanentFacility Adequate

110 Modified (Ash) IS: 1217: 1978 1 % to 10 % % Adequate through adequate
Bitumen Interviewing

Polymer IS: Adequate

111 Modified MSCR Test, 0C 15462(Annex 50 % to 96 % 1.9 % @ 86 % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Bitumen D): 2019 Interviewing

Polymer PAV Residue:- IS: Adequate

112 Modified Complex 15462(Annex 20 oC to 55 oC 1.4 oC @ 45 oC PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Bitumen modulus C): 2019 Interviewing

Polymer IS: Adequate

113 Modified Phase angle 15462(Annex 10 degree to 1.1 degree @ PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Bitumen B): 2019 100 degree 28 degree Interviewing

Polymer RTFO Residue:- IS: Adequate

114 Modified Complex 15462(Annex 50 oC to 96 oC 1.9 oC @ 86 oC PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Bitumen modulus 0C B): 2019 Interviewing

Polymer IS:15462(ANNEX 1.0 % to 10 % 0.18 % @ 3.30 PermanentFacility Adequate

115 Modified Separation - B): 2019 % Adequate through adequate
Bitumen Interviewing

Polymer Separation dif IRC SP Adequate

116 Modified erence in 53(Annex 3): 0.1 % to 100 % 0.18 % @ 3.50 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
 Bitumen softening point 2010 % Interviewing
(R&B)
Polymer 1.3 oC @ 56.80 PermanentFacility Adequate
117 Modified Softening Point IS: 1205: 2022 15 oC to 80 oC oC Adequate through adequate
Bitumen Interviewing

Polymer Solubility in 0.64 % @ 76.40 PermanentFacility Adequate

118 Modified HDO IS:14982: 2022 10 % to 100 % % Adequate through adequate
Bitumen Interviewing

Polymer Complex IRC SP Adequate

119 Modified modulus and 53(Annex.-1) 10 KPa to 100 1.1 KPa @ 28 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Bitumen shear modulus ASTM D 7405 : KPa KPa Interviewing
2010

Polymer 1.3 oC @ 216 Adequate

120 Modified Flashpoint IS: 1209: 2021 15 oC to 275 oC oC PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Bitumen Interviewing

Polymer Viscosity at 150 ASTM D4402 : 150 cst to 600 8.6 cst @ 324 Adequate
121 Modified °C 1978 cst cst PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Bitumen Interviewing

Polymer Elastic recovery IRC SP 53 Adequate

122 Modified of half thread in (ANNEX-4): 10 % to 100 % 0.92 % @ 68.50 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Bitumen ductilometer at 2010 % Interviewing
25°C

Polymer AASHTO T 315: 10 Degree to 90 1.5 Degree @ Adequate

123 Modified Phase angle 2020 Degree 45 Degree PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Bitumen Interviewing

Polymer Solubility in 0.48 % @ 58.30 Adequate

124 Modified IS:14982: 2022 10 % to 100 % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Bitumen (PMB) LDO %
Interviewing

Discipline: Mechanical Group: Buildings Materials Sub Group: Bricks & pre-casted blocks

Burnt Clay Dimension - 1000 mm to 7 mm @ 1384 Adequate

125 IS: 1077: 1972 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Building Bricks Height 2000 mm mm Interviewing

Burnt Clay Dimension - 4000 mm to 20 mm @ 4565 PermanentFacility Adequate

126 Building Bricks Length IS: 1077: 1972 5000 mm mm Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Burnt Clay Dimension - 2000 mm to 11 mm @ 2183 PermanentFacility Adequate

127 Building Bricks Width IS: 1077: 1972 3000 mm mm Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Fly AshBuilding Dimension - 1000 mm to 7 mm @ 1384 Adequate

128 Bricks Height IS:13757: 1993 2000 mm mm PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Fly AshBuilding Dimension - 4000 mm to 20 mm @ 4565 PermanentFacility Adequate

129 Bricks Length IS:13757: 1993 5000 mm mm Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Fly AshBuilding Dimension - 2000 mm to 11 mm @ 2183 PermanentFacility Adequate

130 Bricks Width IS:13757: 1993 3000 mm mm Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Water IS: 15658 0.3 % @ 3.60 Adequate

131 Paver block absorption (Annex-C): 2021 0.10 % to 40 % % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Compressive IS: 5 N/mm2 to 80 1.22 N/mm2 @ Adequate

132 Paver block strength 15658(Annexure- N/mm2 60.6 N/mm2 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
D): 2021 Interviewing

Dimension IS: Adequate

133 Paver block (Thickness) 15658(Annexure- 25 mm
mm
to 500 2.11 mm @
211.21 mm PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
B): 2021 Interviewing

Flexural IS: 1 N/mm2 to 10 0.34 N/mm2 @ PermanentFacility Adequate

134 Paver block Strength 15658(Anneure- N/mm2 8.9 N/mm2 Adequate through adequate
G): 2021 Interviewing

Thickness of IS: 15658 0.01 mm to 20 0.13 mm @ Adequate

135 Paver block wearing layer ([Link].7.2): mm 16.4 mm PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
2021 Interviewing

Visual IS: 15658 Adequate

136 Paver block inspection ([Link].7.2): Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
 2021 Interviewing
Discipline: Mechanical Group: Buildings Materials Sub Group: Cement

Cement IS:1237 (Annex Adequate

137 Concrete Tiles Flatness B) : 2012 0.05 % to 20 % 0.03 %%
@ 12.50 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Cement IS:1237(Annex 0.03 % @ 0.10 PermanentFacility Adequate

138 Concrete Tiles Perpendicularity C): 2012 0.05 % to 10 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Cement Water IS:1237(Annex 0.3 % @ 12.60 PermanentFacility Adequate

139 Concrete Tiles Absorption E): 2012 0.10 % to 50 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Cement Dimension IS:1237(Clause 10 mm to 300 1.2 mm @ 60 Adequate

140 Concrete Tiles (Length, Width, 7) : 2019 mm mm PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Thickness) Interviewing

Cement Wet Transverse IS:1237(Annex 1 N/mm2 to 10 0.3 N/mm2 @ Adequate

141 Concrete Tiles Strength F): 2012 N/mm2 6.7 N/mm2 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Cement Treated Adequate

142 Sub Soundness by IS: 2386(Part- 0.12 % to 30 % 0.05 % @ 3.52 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Base/Cement MgSO4 5): 1963 % Interviewing
Treated Base

Cement Treated Adequate

Sub Soundness by IS: 2386 (Part- 0.05 % @ 3.49
143 Base/Cement Na2SO4 5): 1963 2 % to 30 % % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Treated Base Interviewing

Cement Treated Grading 0.9 % @ 86 Adequate

144 Sub Sieve(Sieve IS: 2386(Part- 1) 20 % to 100 % %Â Size: PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Base/Cement Size: 4.75mm) : 1963 4.75mm to Interviewing
Treated Base 63mm

Standard IS: 4031(Part-- 0.75 % @ 30.53 PermanentFacility Adequate

145 Cement(OPC/PPC/PSC)
Consistency 4): 1988 20 % to 45 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Cement- Compressive IS: 4031 (Part- 5 N/mm2 to 70 1.4 N/mm2 @ Adequate

146 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
(OPC/PPC/PSC) Strength 6): 1988 N/mm2 54.97 N/mm2 Interviewing

Cement- IS: 4031(Part- 1.5 g/cc to 5.0 0.2 g/cc @ 3.13 PermanentFacility Adequate
147 (OPC/PPC/PSC) Density 11): 1988 g/cc g/cc Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Fineness by
Cement- Blaine IS:4031 (Part-2): 150 ma²/kg to 17 ma²/kg @ Adequate
148 (OPC/PPC/PSC) Permeability 1999 600 ma²/kg 372 ma²/kg PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
method Interviewing

Cement- Fineness By IS:4031(Part-1): 0.3 % @ 8.80 Adequate

149 (OPC/PPC/PSC) Dry Seiving 1988 0 % to 10 % % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Method Interviewing

Soundness by Test/Calibration
150 Cement- Autoclave IS: 4031 (Part- 0.01 % to 0.8 % 0.03 %%@ 0.16 PermanentFacility Adequate Witness,Adequate adequate
(OPC/PPC/PSC) expansion 3): 1988 through
method Interviewing

Soundnessby
Cement- Le- IS: 4031 (Part- 0.5 mm to 10 1.33 mm @ Adequate
151 (OPC/PPC/PSC) ChatelierExpansion 3): 1988 mm 0.68 mm PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
method Interviewing

Cement- Final Setting IS: 4031 (Part- 40 min to 600 7 min @ 205 Adequate
152 (OPC/PPC/PSC) Time 5): 1988 min min PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Cement- Initial Setting IS: 4031 (Part- 20 min to 300 5 min @ 149 Adequate
153 (OPC/PPC/PSC) Time 5): 1988 min min PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Jolting
154 Cement- Transverse IS:4031(Part-8) : 2 N/mm2 to 50 0.8 N/mm2 @ PermanentFacility Inadequate apparatus is not
(OPC/PPC/PSC) strength 1998 N/mm2 29 N/mm2 available in the
laboratory

Ground Fineness by Adequate

155 Granulated Blaine Air IS:4031 (Part-- 150 m²/kg to 17 m²/kg @ PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Blast Slag Permeability 2): 1999 600 m²/kg 372 m²/kg Interviewing
Method
Discipline: Mechanical Group: Buildings Materials Sub Group: Concrete

IS: 6441(Part-1): 100 kg/m2 to 2.3 kg/m2 @ Adequate

156 ACC Block Bulk Density 1972 1000 kg/m2 114 kg/m2 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Compressive IS: 6441(Part-5): 5 N/mm2 to 50 1.1 N/mm2 @ Adequate

157 ACC Block Strength 1972 N/mm2 22 N/mm2 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Dimension - IS: 2185(Part-3): 10 mm to 500 Adequate

158 ACC Block 3 mm @ 60 mm PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Height 1984 mm Interviewing

Dimension - IS: 2185(Part-3): 100 mm to 1000 12 mm @ 300 Adequate

159 ACC Block Length 1984 mm mm PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Benkelman Adequate
160 Bituminous/Concrete
Beam Deflection IRC: 81: 2019 0 mm to 15 mm 0.33 mm @ 5.7 SiteFacility Adequate through adequate
Road Test mm Interviewing

Adequate
161 Bituminous/Concrete
NSV(LCMS-2) IRC SP 16: 1500 mm/Km to 13.84 mm/Km SiteFacility Adequate through File adequate
Road 2019 3500 mm/Km @ 2350 mm/Km Review (Record
Review)

Bridge Load Adequate

Bituminous/Concrete
Test(Bituminous IRC SP 51: 100 Tonne to 2.3 Tonne @ SiteFacility Adequate through adequate
162 Road Section & 2015 1000 Tonne 225 Tonne Interviewing
ConcreteSection)

Bituminous/Concrete
Falling Weight Adequate
163 Road Section Deflectometer IRC 81: 2015 0 mm to 15 mm 0.33 mm
mm
@ 5.7 SiteFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Surface
evenness of Test/Calibration
164 Bituminous/Concrete Highway IRC SP 16: 1500 mm/Km to 13.54 mm/Km SiteFacility Adequate Witness,Adequate adequate
RoadSection Pavements(Bituminous 2019 3500 mm/Km @ 2350 mm/Km through
& Concrete Interviewing
Road)

Pull-out Test Adequate

165 Concrete (Bond in IS: 2770(Part-1): 10 N/mm2 to 60 4 N/mm2 @ 60 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Reinforcement 1983 N/mm2 N/mm2 Interviewing
Concrete)

Adequate
166 Concrete Kerb Angle of Kerb
IS: 5758(Clause 10 deg. to 250 4 deg. @ 220
PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
-6.1): 2020 deg. deg. Interviewing

IS: 2 mm to 150 4 mm @ 120 Adequate

167 Concrete Kerb Height ofKerb 5758(Annexure- mm mm PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
B): 2020 Interviewing

Thickness of IS: 2 mm to 100 2.5 mm @ 80 Adequate

168 Concrete Kerb Kerb 5758(Annexure- mm mm PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
B): 2020 Interviewing

Water IS: Adequate

169 Concrete Kerb Absorption 5758(Annexure- 5 % to 12 % 0.5 % @ 10 % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
D): 2020 Interviewing

170 Concrete Kerb Compressive IS: 516(Part--1/ 5 N/mm2 to 45 1.3 N/mm2 @ PermanentFacility Inadequate Inappropriate
Strength Sec-1): 2021 N/mm2 40 N/mm2 test method

Compaction IS: 1199(Part- Adequate

171 Fresh Concrete factor 6): 2018 0.01to 1.0 0.04@ 0.56 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

IS: 1199(Part-- 5 mm to 200 1.6 mm @ 86 PermanentFacility, Adequate

172 Fresh Concrete Slump 2): 2018 mm mm SiteFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

IS 1199 (Part 3) 1.5 Kg/m2 to 5 0.2 Kg/m2 @ Adequate

173 Fresh Concrete Density PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
: 1983 Kg/m2 2.6 Kg/m2 Interviewing

174 Hardened Water IS: 516(Part- 0.10 % to 15 % 0.22 % @ 4.90 PermanentFacility Inadequate Inappropriate
Concrete Absorption 1/Sec-1): 2021 % test method.

Unable to verify
Rapid chloride 100 Coulombs 25 Coulombs the competency
Hardened ASTM C 1202: due to the
175 Concrete permeability 2012 to 5000 @ 1850 PermanentFacility Inadequate equipment being
test Coulombs Coulombs unavailable with
the laboratory.
Compressive
Strength of
176 Hardened accelerated IS: 516(Part- 5 N/mm2 to 80 1.2 N/mm2 @ PermanentFacility Inadequate Inappropriate is
Concrete cured concrete 1/Sec-1): 2021 N/mm2 49.22 N/mm2 code
specimen

Compressive Adequate
177 Hardened Strength of IS: 516(Part- 1/ 5 N/mm2 to 80 1.34 N/mm2 @ PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Concrete Concrete Sec-1): 2018 N/mm2 45.3 N/mm2 Interviewing
cube/Cylindrical

Depth of Adequate
178 Hardened Penetration of IS 516 (Part- 2 mm to 100 0.45 mm @ 20 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Concrete water under 2/Sec-1): 2018 mm mm Interviewing
pressure

Hardened Depth of water DIN: 1048 (Part- 1 mm to 100 1.2 mm @ 19 Adequate

179 Concrete Penetration 5): 2015 mm mm PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
under pressure Interviewing

Hardened Depth of water IS: 516 (Part- 1 mm to 100 0.2 mm @ 22

180 Concrete Penetration 2/Sec-1): 2018 mm mm PermanentFacility Inadequate Test repeated
under pressure

Hardened Flexural IS: 516 Part- 1/ 1 N/mm2 to 20 0.31 N/mm2 @ PermanentFacility Adequate
181 Concrete Strength Sec-1): 2021 N/mm2 9.4 N/mm2 Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Discipline: Mechanical Group: Buildings Materials Sub Group: Concrete Mixers

Concrete IS: 1199(Part-4): 0.18 % @ 4.80 PermanentFacility Adequate

182 Admixture Air content 2018 0.5 % to 5 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Concrete IS: 9103(Annex 0.07 % @ 3.70 PermanentFacility Adequate

183 Admixture Bleeding D): 1999 0 % to 5 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Concrete Loss IS: 9103, 0 Minute to 120 6 Minute @ 90 Adequate

184 Admixture Workability (Clause 4): 1999 Minute Minute PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Adequate
185 Concrete Water content IS: 9103: 1999 10 % to 90 % 0.7 % @ 45.40 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Admixture % Interviewing

Concrete IS: 9103 300 mm to 620 7 mm @ 540 Adequate

186 Admixture Flow (Annex-C): 1994 mm mm PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Concrete Compressive
187 strength (
AdmixtureCement Percent IS: 516 (Part-3): 10 % to 90 % 2.4 % @ 80 % PermanentFacility Inadequate b
& Concrete of 2018
control sample)

Concrete Time of setting, Adequate

allowable 10 Min @ 3.6
188 AdmixtureCement deviation from IS: 8142: 2018 50 Min to 5 Hrs Hrs PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
& Concrete control sample Interviewing

Concrete Drying
shrinkage
Concrete moulds as per
189 AdmixtureCement Drying IS: 516(Part-6): 0.01 % to 0.5 % 0.001 %%@ 0.12 PermanentFacility Inadequate clause 4.3.4 as
& Concrete Shrinkage 2020 per IS 516(part
6):2022 are not
evidenced in the
laboratory

Concrete Flexural Adequate

strength, IS: 516 (Part-4) 01 N/mm2 to 10 0.42 N/mm2 @
190 AdmixtureCement percent of (Sec-1): 2018 N/mm2 9.2 N/mm2 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
& Concrete control sample Interviewing

Concrete Length change, Adequate

191 percent
AdmixtureCement increase IS: 9459: 1980 0.002 % to 0.001 % @ PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
& Concrete over 0.015 % 0.009 % Interviewing
control sample

Concrete Slump below Adequate

192 that of the
AdmixtureCement control IS: 1199 (Part- 1.0 mm to 15 0.4 mm @ 10 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
& Concrete mix 2): 1989 mm mm Interviewing
concrete
Discipline: Mechanical Group: Buildings Materials Sub Group: Fly ash

Burnt Clay Adequate

193 Building Efflorescence IS: 3495 (Part-3) Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Bricks/Fly Ash : 2019 Interviewing
Building Bricks

Burnt Clay Adequate

194 Building Warpage IS: 3495(Part-4): 1 mm to 15 mm 0.5 mm @ 8.5 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Bricks/Fly Ash 2019 mm Interviewing
Building Bricks

Burnt Clay Adequate

Building Water IS: 3495 (Part- 0.14 % @ 10.56 through
195 Bricks/Fly Ash Absorption 2): 2019 1 % to 30 % % PermanentFacility Adequate adequate
Building Bricks Interviewing

Burnt Clay Adequate

196 Building Compressive IS: 3495 (Part- 3 N/mm2 to 40 0.25 N/mm2 @ PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Bricks/Fly Ash Strength 1): 2019 N/mm2 11.67 N/mm2 Interviewing
Building Bricks

IS: 1727, Adequate

197 Fly ash Specific Gravity Clause 15: 1967 2to 3.0 0.14@ 2.56 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Compressive IS: 1727 Adequate

198 Fly ash Strength (Clause 10): 80 % to 100 % 1.1 % @ 86 % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
1967 Interviewing

Fineness by IS:1727 (Clause 170 m2/kg to 11.8 m2/kg @ Adequate

199 Fly ash Blaine Air 6.1): 1967 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Permeability 600 m2/kg 326 m2/kg Interviewing

IS: 1727 4.5 N/mm2 to 1.8 N/mm2 @ Adequate

200 Fly ash Lime Reactivity (Clause 9): 1967 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
20 N/mm2 4.6 N/mm2 Interviewing

Particles IS: 1727 Adequate

201 Fly ash Retained on 45 (Clause 6.2.5): 5 % to 50 % 1.8 % @ 34 % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
micron 1967 Interviewing

Soundness by Adequate
202 Fly ash Autoclave IS:1727 (Clause 0 % to 8 % 0.052 % @ 0.60 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Expansion 7): 1967 % Interviewing
method

Discipline: Mechanical Group: Buildings Materials Sub Group: Others

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
Joint demonstrated
Sealant(PolysulphideRheological IS 11433 and not having
203 & Polyurethene Properties (PART-2) Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Inadequate records like PT,
Sealant) (Clause-2): 1986 ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Dimension - IS 2185 (Part-3) 10 mm to 300 7 mm @ 200 Adequate

204 ACC Block Weight : 1984 mm mm PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Anti stripping IS: 1448(Part- 1.4 oC @ 112 Adequate

205 Compound Pour point 10/Sec-2: 2021 1 oC to 150 oC oC PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Anti stripping Retained MORT&H Spec 0.64 % @ 86.05 PermanentFacility Adequate

206 Compound Marshal (Appendix-4): 10 % to 100 % % Adequate through adequate
Stability 2013 Interviewing

Anti stripping Specific Gravity Adequate

207 Compound 27°C IS:1202: 2021 0.5to 2.0 0.07@ 0.88 PermanentFacility Adequate through Adequate
Interviewing

Anti stripping Morth Spec Adequate

208 Compound Appearance(Visual) (Appendix 4): Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through Adequate
2013 Interviewing

Adequate
209 Anti stripping Flash point 1448(Part-69): 100 oC to 300 2.5 oC @ 239 PermanentFacility Adequate through Adequate
Compound 2019 oC oC Interviewing

Anti stripping 100 oC to 300 2.5 oC @ 239 Adequate

210 Compound Flash point IS: 1209: 2021 oC oC PermanentFacility Adequate through Adequate
Interviewing

Anti stripping Odour Appendix 4 Adequate

211 Compound (Smelling) Morth Spec: Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through Adequate
2013 Interviewing

Anti stripping Adequate

212 Compound Water content IS: 1211: 2022 1 % to 60 % 0.3 % @ 24 % PermanentFacility Adequate through Adequate
Interviewing

213 BOLT Elongation IS: 1608(Part- 0.5 % to 80 % 0.45 % @ 51.70 PermanentFacility Inadequate Inappropriate
1): 2022 % test method

IS: 1586(Part- 50 HRB to 120 60 HRB @ 80 Adequate

214 BOLT Hardness 1): 2018 HRB HRB PermanentFacility Adequate through Adequate
Interviewing

215 BOLT Lower Yield IS: 1608(Part- 1) 150 N/mm2 to 240 N/mm2 @ PermanentFacility Inadequate Inappropriate
: 2022 450 N/mm2 440 N/mm2 test method

216 BOLT Proof Load IS: 1608 (Part- 20500 N to 24000 N @ PermanentFacility Inadequate Inappropriate
1): 2022 110500 N 98628 N test method

217 BOLT Ultimate Tensile IS: 1608(Part- 300 N/mm2 to 350 N/mm2 @ PermanentFacility Inadequate Inappropriate
Strength 1): 2022 600 N/mm2 540 N/mm2 test method

Curing Surface Drying ASTM C 309 100 Minute to 5 Minute @ 219 PermanentFacility Adequate
218 Compound Time (Clause 10.3): 600 Minute Minute Adequate through adequate
2019 Interviewing

Curing Viscosity by IS: ASTM D 20 cSt to 400 4 cSt @ 220 Adequate

219 Compound Ford Cup (B4) 1200: 1970 cSt cSt PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Curing ASTM C: 156 : 0.42 % @ 61.40 PermanentFacility Adequate

220 Compound Water Retention 2017 10 % to 100 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Curing Curing Adequate

221 Compound Efficiency BS 7542: 2017 10 % to 100 % 1.7 % @ 71 % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Curing Day Light ASTM E: 97: Adequate

222 Compound reflectance 2003 40 % to 95 % 1.43 % @ 62 % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Curing Loss of Mass In 0.1 Kg/m2 to 2 0.08 Kg/m2 @ Adequate

223 Compound 72 Hrs. BS: 7542: 1992 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Kg/m2 0.4 Kg/m2 Interviewing

Curing Adequate
224 Compound Specific Gravity BS: 7542: 2017 1to 5 0.2@ 2.6 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

G I Sheet / Dimension (Dia IRC: 18 APP: Adequate

225 HDPE / & Thickness) 2000 2 mm to 30 mm 0.3 mm
mm
@ 15.5 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Sheathing Duct Interviewing

MORT&H Spec
GI Sheet / (Clause Adequate
226 Transverse Load 1805.6.2) 0.05 % @ 1.50
HDPE / Rating Test Appendix 1 % to 10 % % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Sheathing Duct 1800/ITest B: Interviewing
2013

MORT& Spec.
GI Sheet / (Clause Adequate
227 HDPE / Water loss test 1805.6.2) 0 % to 5 % 0.8 % @ 3 % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Sheathing Duct Appendix 1800/I Interviewing
Test D: 2013

MORT&H Spec.
GI Sheet / (Clause Adequate
228 HDPE / Workability 1805.6.2) Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Appendix
Sheathing Duct 1800/ITest : Interviewing
2013

MORT&H Spec
GI Sheet / (Clause Adequate
HDPE 1805.6.2) 100 kN to 2000 30 kN @ 1800
229 Sheathing Load tension Appendix kN kN PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Ducts 1800/ITest C: Interviewing
2013

Granular Sub Grading ( Sieve IS: 2386(Part- 1.2 % @ 84.52 PermanentFacility Adequate
230 Base Size: 4.75mmto 1): 1963 20 % to 100 % % Adequate through adequate
63mm) Interviewing

Granular Sub Water IS: 2386(Part- 0.06 % @ 0.45 PermanentFacility Adequate

231 Base Absorption 3): 1963 0.1 % to 30 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Granular Sub Wet Aggregate 0.12 % @ 16.42 PermanentFacility Adequate

232 Base Impact Value IS: 5640: 1970 5 % to 60 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Granular Sub Grading ( Sieve Table 400-1 1.2 % @ 84.52 PermanentFacility Adequate
233 Base Size: 4.75mmto MORT&H Spec: 20 % to 100 % % Adequate through adequate
63mm) 2013 Interviewing

GranularSub Aggregate IS: 2386(Part- 0.12 % @ 16.42 PermanentFacility Adequate

234 5 % to 60 % Adequate through adequate
Base Impact Value 4): 1963 % Interviewing

Ground Furnace IS: Test parameter

235 Granulated Moisture 16714(Annex 0.1 % to 1.5 % 0.02 % @ 0.60 PermanentFacility Inadequate nomenclature is
Blast Slag Content B): 2018 % not as per IS
16714.

Ground Furnance Slag Test parameter

236 Granulated activity Index - IS: 4031(Part-- 80 % to 140 % 4.5 % @ 110 % PermanentFacility Inadequate nomenclature is
Blast Slag 28 days 6): 1988 not as per IS
16714.

Ground Furnance Slag Test parameter

237 Granulated Activity index-7 IS: 4031(Part-6):
1988 70 % to 100 % 3.5 % @ 90 % PermanentFacility Inadequate nomenclature is
not as per IS
Blast Slag days 16714.

Not comes
238 Grouting Mix Alkali Content IS: 4032: 1985 0.05 % to 0.2 % 0.01 %%@ 0.06 PermanentFacility Inadequate under
Mechanical
scope

0.1 % @ 2.50 Adequate

239 Grouting Mix Bleeding IS: 9103: 1999 2 % to 10 % % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Deleterious 0.01 % @ 0.22 Specific test

240 Grouting Mix Material IS: 2386: 1963 0.1 % to 1.0 % % PermanentFacility Inadequate method not
given

BSEN: 445: 0.2 % @ 4.25 Adequate

241 Grouting Mix Flowability 2007 2 % to 20 % % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

ASTM C: 403: 50 Minute to 5 5Minute @ 3.5 Adequate

242 Grouting Mix Setting Time 2008 Hrs Hrs PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
Joint demonstrated
Sealant(Polysulphide
Adhesion After IS 12118(PART- 1.34 % @ 55.4 PermanentFacility and not having
243 & Polyurethene Heat Ageing 2) ( Clause-9): 10 % to 80 % % Inadequate records like PT,
Sealant) 1987 ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
Joint demonstrated
Sealant(PolysulphideAdhesion-in- IS 11433(PART- and not having
244 & Polyurethene Peel 2) ( Clause-7): Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Inadequate records like PT,
Sealant) 1989 ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .
 Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
Joint Adhesion-in- demonstrated
Peel After Heat
Sealant(Polysulphide IS 11433(PART- and not having
245 & Polyurethene Sunlamp 2) ( Clause-8): Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Inadequate records like PT,
Sealant) Irradiation 1986 ILC,, retesting of
Though Glass retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
Joint demonstrated
Sealant(Polysulphide IS 1834 0.12 % @ 1.85 PermanentFacility and not having
246 & Polyurethene Change in Mass (Appendix-E): 0.5 % to 2.5 % % Inadequate records like PT,
Sealant) 1984 ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
Joint demonstrated
Sealant(PolysulphideCompression ASTM D2628: and not having
247 250 N/m to 850 4.5 N/m @ 650 PermanentFacility Inadequate records like PT,
& Polyurethene 1991 N/m N/m
ILC,, retesting of
Sealant) retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
Joint demonstrated
Sealant(Polysulphide IS 11433 and not having
248 & Polyurethene Cyclic Adhesion Clause-6):
(PART-2) ( Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Inadequate records like PT,
Sealant) 1986 ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
Joint demonstrated
Sealant(PolysulphideElongation at ASTM D412: and not having
249 & Polyurethene Break 2016 150 % to 650 % 3.5 % @ 450 % PermanentFacility Inadequate records like PT,
Sealant) ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
Joint demonstrated
Sealant(Polysulphide and not having
250 ASTM D2628: 1.22 % @ 26.6 PermanentFacility records like PT,
& Polyurethene Elongation Loss 1991 10 % to 50 % % Inadequate
ILC,, retesting of
Sealant) retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
 due not
Joint demonstrated
Sealant(PolysulphideExtensibility IS 1834 1.5 mm to 15 0.5 mm @ 10.5 PermanentFacility and not having
251 & Polyurethene Appendix-C): mm mm Inadequate records like PT,
Sealant) 1984 ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .
Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
Joint demonstrated
Sealant(Polysulphide Flow test IS 1834 0.5 % @ 11.5 and not having
252 & Polyurethene (Appendix-B): 2 % to 15 % % PermanentFacility Inadequate records like PT,
Sealant) 1984 ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
Joint demonstrated
Sealant(Polysulphide Hardness ASTM D2240: 40 Points to 65 2.4 Points @ 46 PermanentFacility and not having
253 & Polyurethene 2015 Points Points Inadequate records like PT,
Sealant) ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
Joint demonstrated
Sealant(Polysulphide Hardness ASTM D471: 0 Points to 30 2.4 Points @ 26 PermanentFacility and not having
254 & Polyurethene Change 2016 Points Points Inadequate records like PT,
Sealant) ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
Joint demonstrated
Sealant(Polysulphide Increase IS 1834 5 (1/10th of mm) 2 (1/10th of mm) and not having
255 & Polyurethene Penetration (Appendix-D): to 35 (1/10th of @ 25 (1/10th of PermanentFacility Inadequate records like PT,
Sealant) 1984 mm) mm) ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
Joint demonstrated
256 Loss Mass After IS2)11433(PART-
Sealant(Polysulphide ( Clause-4): 1 % to 30 % 0.52 % @ 12.3 PermanentFacility Inadequate
and not having
records like PT,
& Polyurethene Heat Ageing 1986 % ILC,, retesting of
Sealant) retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
Low due not
Joint Temperature demonstrated
Recovery,22h/70h ASTM D2628:
Sealant(Polysulphide and not having
257 & Polyurethene at -10ºC, - 1991 40 % to 95 % 1.4 % @ 75 % PermanentFacility Inadequate records like PT,
 Sealant) 29ºC & - ILC,, retesting of
100ºC, 50% retained
Deflection samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .
Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
Joint Low demonstrated
258 Sealant(PolysulphideTemperature
Stiffening, ASTM D2628: 5 Points to 35 1.9 Points @ 32 PermanentFacility Inadequate
and not having
records like PT,
& Polyurethene Hardness 1991 Points Points ILC,, retesting of
Sealant) Change retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
Joint demonstrated
Sealant(Polysulphide Oil Swell ASTM D1149: 1.42 % @ 46.5 PermanentFacility and not having
259 & Polyurethene Weight Change 2018 20 % to 65 % % Inadequate records like PT,
Sealant) ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
Joint demonstrated
Oven Ageing,
Sealant(Polysulphide ASTM D573: 1.32 % @ 36.5 PermanentFacility and not having
260 & Polyurethene Tensile Strength 2009 10 % to 55 % % Inadequate records like PT,
Sealant) Loss ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
Joint demonstrated
Sealant(Polysulphide Ozone ASTM D2240: and not having
261 Resistance 2019 Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Inadequate records like PT,
& Polyurethene ILC,, retesting of
Sealant) retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
Joint demonstrated
Sealant(PolysulphidePenetration 10 (1/10th of 2.5 (1/10th of and not having
262 & Polyurethene IS 1203: 2022 mm) to 65 mm) @ 55 PermanentFacility Inadequate records like PT,
Sealant) (1/10th of mm) (1/10th of mm) ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
Joint demonstrated
Sealant(Polysulphide Plastic Appendix-B, BS 1.32 % @ 35.5 PermanentFacility and not having
263 & Polyurethene 4254: 1983 10 % to 80 % % Inadequate records like PT,
Sealant) ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
 value .
Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
Joint demonstrated
Sealant(Polysulphide Pour Point IS 1834 150 oC to 250 3.5 oC @ 150 and not having
264 & Polyurethene (Appendix-A):: oC oC PermanentFacility Inadequate records like PT,
Sealant) 1984 ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
demonstrated
Joint IS 11433(PART- and not having
265 Sealant(Polysulphide Recovery 2) (Clause-3): 10 % to 80 % 1.54 % @ 65.4 PermanentFacility Inadequate records like PT,
& Polyurethene 1986 % ILC,, retesting of
Sealant) retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
demonstrated
Joint IS 11433 and not having
266 Sealant(PolysulphideRheological (PART-2) Qualitative :@ N/A PermanentFacility Inadequate records like PT,
& Polyurethene Properties (Clause-2): 1986 ILC,, retesting of
Sealant) retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
demonstrated
Joint IS 11433 and not having
267 Sealant(Polysulphide Staining (PART-2) ( Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Inadequate records like PT,
& Polyurethene Clause-5): 1989 ILC,, retesting of
Sealant) retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
demonstrated
Joint and not having
268 Sealant(Polysulphide ASTM D412: 5 N/mm2 1.12 N/mm2 @ PermanentFacility
& Polyurethene Tensile Strength 2016 to 25 N/mm2 21.54 N/mm2
Inadequate records like PT,
ILC,, retesting of
Sealant) retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
demonstrated
Joint Sealant Water ASTM D-5249 : 0.06 % @ 0.28 PermanentFacility and not having
269 (Backer Rods) Absorption 2010 0.1 % to 0.5 % % Inadequate records like PT,
ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
 of the laboratory
due not
25% demonstrated
Joint Sealant ASTM D-5249 : 0.1 kg/cm2 to 0.08 kg/cm2 @ PermanentFacility and not having
270 Compression Inadequate
(Backer Rods) deflection 2010 1.5 kg/cm2 1.02 kg/cm2 records like PT,
ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .
Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
demonstrated
Joint Sealant Compression ASTM D-5249 : 2.12 % @ 98.4 PermanentFacility and not having
271 (Backer Rods) Recovery 2010 80 % to 150 % % Inadequate records like PT,
ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
demonstrated
and not having
Joint Sealant Density ASTM D-5249 : 50 kg/m3 2.4 kg/m3 @ PermanentFacility Inadequate records like PT,
272 (Backer Rods) 2010 to 100 kg/m3 86.8 kg/m3 ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
demonstrated
Joint Sealant Heat ASTM D-5249 : 180 oC to 220 3.2 oC @ 208 and not having
273 (Backer Rods) Resistance 2010 oC oC PermanentFacility Inadequate records like PT,
ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
demonstrated
Joint Sealant Maximum ASTM D-5249 : 0.32 % @ 9.6 and not having
274 (Backer Rods) Shrinkage 2019 5 % to 15 % % PermanentFacility Inadequate records like PT,
ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

Unable to verify
the competency
of the laboratory
due not
demonstrated
Joint Sealant 1 kg/cm2 to 3 0.1 kg/cm2 @ and not having
275 Tensile Strength ASTM2010
D-5249 : PermanentFacility Inadequate records like PT,
(Backer Rods) kg/cm2 1.68 kg/cm2 ILC,, retesting of
retained
samples and
measurement of
uncertainty
value .

276 NUT Hardness IS: 1586(Part- 1) 100 HRB to 400 14 HRB @ 380 PermanentFacility Inadequate Inappropriate
Rockwell : 2018 HRB HRB test method.

277 NUT Proof Load IS: 1608 (Part- 80000 N to 86 N @ 92000 PermanentFacility Inadequate Inappropriate
1): 2022 150000 N N test method
278 NUT Stress Under IS: 1608 (Part- 500 N/mm2 to 5.9 N/mm2 @ PermanentFacility Inadequate Inappropriate
Proof Load 1): 2022 test method.
800 N/mm2 720 N/mm2

Poly Sulphide Mass Change at BS 5212 (Part- 0.04 % @ 0.28 PermanentFacility Adequate
279 Sealent 48 hrs 3) : 1990 -10 % to 5 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Poly Sulphide Mass Loss(@7 BS 5212 (Part- 0.18 % @ 5.20 PermanentFacility Adequate
280 Sealent degree C/14 3): 1990 1.02 % to 7 % % Adequate through adequate
days) Interviewing

Adequate
281 Poly Sulphide Penetration BS 5212 (Part- 1.0 mm to 2.5 0.12 mm @ 1.4 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Sealent After Ageing 3): 1990 mm mm Interviewing

Poly Sulphide Penetration BS 5212 (Part- 0.2 mm to 3 0.05 mm @ 0.7 PermanentFacility Adequate
282 Adequate through adequate
Sealent Before Ageing 3): 1990 mm mm Interviewing

Poly Sulphide Physical BS 5212 (Part- Adequate

283 Sealent Appearance 3): 1990 Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Resistance to
Plastic Flow(60 Adequate
Poly Sulphide degree Celcious BS 5212 (Part- 0.18 mm @ 2.0
284 Sealent 3): 1990 1 mm to 3 mm mm PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
/5hrs./75 degree Interviewing
angle)

Poly Sulphide Track Free BS 5212 (Part- Adequate

285 Sealent Condition(RT 3): 1990 Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
@16hrs.) Interviewing

Poly Sulphide Pot Life @ 25 BS 5212 (Part- 1 Hours to 4 0.30 Hours @ Adequate
286 Sealent degree celsius 3): 1990 Hours 2.6 Hours PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Retro reflective Coefficient of ASTM E1709- 10 cd//m2/lux to 5 cd//m2/lux @ Adequate

287 Signboards/Road Retro-reflection- SiteFacility Adequate through adequate
Studs/TRMM RL & QD 16e2: 2020 1000 cd//m2/lux 845 cd//m2/lux Interviewing

Retro reflective Coefficient of Adequate

288 Signboards/Road Retro-reflection- ASTM E810: 10 cd/m2/lux to 5 cd/m/lux @ SiteFacility Adequate through adequate
Studs/TRMM RL & QD 2020 1000 cd/m/lux 845 cd/m/lux Interviewing

Adequate
289 Rivets Diameter IS: 1929: 1982 1 mm to 50 mm 0.7 mm
mm
@ 25.7 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Adequate
290 Rivets Dump test IS: 1148 : 2009 Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Head Adequate
291 Rivets Soundness Test IS: 1148 : 2009 Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

1.5 kN @ 246 Adequate

292 Rivets Shear test IS: 5242: 1979 10 kN to 500 kN kN PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

RPM (ROAD Compressive ASTM D 4280: 10000 Kg to 20 Kg @ 18790 PermanentFacility Adequate

293 STUDS) Strength 2018 25000 Kg Kg Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

RPM (ROAD Deformation at ASTM 4280: 0.1 mm @ 5.3 Adequate

294 STUDS) 13635 kg 2018 1 mm to 10 mm mm PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

RPM (ROAD Longitudinal ASTM 4280: 5000 N to 15000 25 N @ 7650 N PermanentFacility Adequate
295 STUDS) Flexural 2018 N Adequate through adequate
Strength Interviewing

Thermoplastic Flow EAS-928-1 0.27 % @ 20.20 PermanentFacility Adequate

296 Road Marking Resistance test (Annexure-D) : 10 % to 50 % % Adequate through adequate
Material 2019 Interviewing

Thermoplastic MORTH Adequate

297 Road Marking Free Flow Test Spec(Section - Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Material 800): 2013 Interviewing

Thermoplastic Glass BS 3262(Part-1) 0.24 % @ 24.10 PermanentFacility Adequate

298 Road Marking BeadsContent (Appendix D) : 0.5 % to 80 % % Adequate through adequate
Material 1987 Interviewing
 Thermoplastic Gradation of MORTH 0.23 % @ 43.20 PermanentFacility Adequate
299 Road Marking Glass Spec(Section- 10 % to 100 % Adequate through adequate
%
Material Beads(Type 1 & 800): 2013 Interviewing
2)
Thermoplastic AASHTO M249: 1.32 % @ 54.30 PermanentFacility Adequate
300 Road Marking LuminanceTest 2012 10 % to 98 % % Adequate through adequate
Material Interviewing

Thermoplastic 0.02 % @ 1.20 PermanentFacility Adequate

301 Road Marking Refractive Index BS 6088: 1981 0.5 % to 1.6 % Adequate through adequate
Material % Interviewing

Thermoplastic Roundness- 0.42 % @ 54.80 PermanentFacility Adequate

302 Road Marking Microscopic BS 6088: 1981 10 % to 100 % % Adequate through adequate
Material Interviewing

Thermoplastic Skid Resistance BS 6044 0.72 % @ 51.80 PermanentFacility Adequate

303 Road Marking test (Appendix K): 10 % to 70 % % Adequate through adequate
Material 1987 Interviewing

Thermoplastic ASTM D 36: 1.8 oC @ 118 Adequate

304 Road Marking Softening Point 2014 30 oC to 400 oC oC PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Material Interviewing

Thermoplastic Yellowness AASHTO M 0.02 % to 0.13 0.007 % @ 0.08 PermanentFacility Adequate

305 Road Marking Index 250: 2005 % % Adequate through adequate
Material Interviewing

Test/Calibration
Thermoplastic Coeff Of Retro- BS EN 1436: 1.0 mcd/m2/lux 5.4 mcd/m2/lux Witness,Adequate
306 Road Marking Reflection 2018 to 1000 @ 734 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Material mcd/m2/lux mcd/m2/lux Interviewing

Thermoplastic AASHTOM 249: Qualitative Adequate

307 Road Marking Colour 2012 :Visual N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Material Interviewing

Thermoplastic Cracking ASHTO T-250: Adequate

308 Road Marking Resistance 2005 Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Material Interviewing

Thermoplastic MORTH Spec: 50 minute to 4 minute @ 141 PermanentFacility Adequate

309 Road Marking Drying Time 2013 300 minute minute Adequate through adequate
Material Interviewing

Thermoplastic BS:3262 (Part- 0.45 % @ 51.70 PermanentFacility Adequate

310 Road Marking Binder Content 1): 1987 10 % to 80 % % Adequate through adequate
Material Interviewing

Thermoplastic Test/Calibration
311 RoadMarking Roundness- BS EN 1423: 1 % to 100 % 0.42 % @ 54.80 PermanentFacility Adequate Witness,Adequate adequate
Material Microscopic 2012 % through
Interviewing

Water Bound Elongation IS: 2386(Part- 0.21 % @ 29.45 PermanentFacility Adequate

312 Macadam Index 1): 1963 1 % to 40 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Water Bound IS: 2386(Part- 0.24 % @ 19.65 PermanentFacility Adequate

313 Macadam Flakiness Index 1): 1963 1 % to 40 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Water Bound Grading (Sieve IS: 2386(Part- 0.9 % @ 86.54 PermanentFacility Adequate
314 Macadam Size: 4.75mm 1): 1963 20 % to 100 % % Adequate through adequate
to 63mm) Interviewing

Water Bound IS: 2386 (Part- 0.12 % @ 16.42 PermanentFacility Adequate

315 Macadam Impact Value 4): 1963 5 % to 60 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Water Bound Los Angeles IS: 2386(Part- 1.21 % @ 22.12 PermanentFacility Adequate
316 Macadam Abrasion Value 4): 1963 5 % to 60 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Water Bound Soundness by IS: 2386(Part- 0.05 % @ 3.52 PermanentFacility Adequate

317 Macadam MgSO4 5): 1963 2 % to 30 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Water Bound Soundness by IS: 2386(Part- 0.05 % @ 3.49 PermanentFacility Adequate

318 Macadam Na2SO4 5): 1963 2 % to 3 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Water Bound Water IS: 2386(Part- 0.06 % @ 0.45 PermanentFacility Adequate

319 0.2 % to 30 % Adequate through adequate
Macadam Absorption 3): 1963 % Interviewing
 Water Bound Wet Aggregate 0.12 % @ 16.42 PermanentFacility Adequate
320 Macadam Impact Value IS: 5640 : 1970 5 % to 60 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Water Bound ASTM D 5821: Adequate

321 Macadam Fractured Faces 2013 1 % to 100 % 0.5 % @ 57 % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Wet Mix Elongation IS: 2386(Part- 0.13 % @ 17.55 PermanentFacility Adequate

322 Macadam Index 1): 1963 5 % to 60 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Wet Mix IS: 2386(Part- 0.12 % @ 18.60 PermanentFacility Adequate

323 Macadam Flakiness Index 1): 1963 5 % to 60 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Wet Mix IS: 2386(Part- 0.12 % @ 16.42 PermanentFacility Adequate

324 Macadam Impact Value 4): 1963 5 % to 60 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Wet Mix Los Angeles IS: 2386(Part- 1.21 % @ 22.12 PermanentFacility Adequate
325 Macadam Abrasion Value 4): 1963 5 % to 60 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Wet Mix Soundness by IS: 2386(Part- 5) 0.05 % @ 3.52 PermanentFacility Adequate

326 2 % to 30 % Adequate through adequate
Macadam MgSO4 : 1963 % Interviewing

Wet Mix Soundness by IS: 2386 (Part- 0.05 % @ 3.49 PermanentFacility Adequate
327 Macadam Na2SO4 5): 1963 2 % to 30 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Wet Mix Water IS: 2386(Part- 0.06 % @ 0.45 PermanentFacility Adequate

328 Macadam Absorption 3): 1963 0.2 % to 30 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Wet Grading ( Sieve IS: 2386(Part- 0.9 % @ 86.54 PermanentFacility Adequate

329 MixMacadam Size:4.75mm to 1): 1963 20 % to 100 % % Adequate through adequate
63mm) Interviewing

Discipline: Mechanical Group: Buildings Materials Sub Group: Reinforcement Steel (rebar)

Qualitative :
Mandrel size-
(8, 10, 12, 15,
18, 16, 20, 24,
25, 28, 30, 32,
35, 36, 40, 42,
48, 50, 56, 60, Given size
64, 70, 72, 75, mandrels are
80, 84, 96, 100, not evidenced in
330 Reinforcement Bend Test IS:1599: 2019 108, 112, 120, N/A PermanentFacility Inadequate the laboratory
steel bar 125, 128, 135, except
140, 144, 150, 96,100,112,128,140,192
160, 168, 175, mm dia
180, 192, 196, mandrels.
200, 216, 224,
225, 240, 250,
252, 270, 280,
288, 300, 315,
320, 350, 360,
400) mm

331 Reinforcement Cross sectional IS: 2062(Clause 10 mm2 to 2500 5 mm2 @ 1545 PermanentFacility Inadequate Inappropriate
steel bar area 15): 2011 mm2 mm2 test method

Reinforcement IS:1786(Clause 1.0 Kg/m to 10 0.05 kg/m @ Adequate

332 steel bar Mass per meter 7.1): 2008 kg/m 2.65 kg/m PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Reinforcement IS: 2062 1.3 mm @ 25 irrelevant test for

333 steel bar Thickness (Clause- 15): 6 mm to 50 mm mm PermanentFacility Inadequate Reinforcement
2011 steel.

334 Reinforcement Diameter IS:1786 (Clause 4 mm to 36 mm 0.05 mm @ 25 PermanentFacility Inadequate Specified clause
steel bars 6.3): 2008 mm is inappropriate.

Reinforcement Elongation IS:1608 (Part-1): 0.5 % @ 22.70 PermanentFacility Adequate

335 steel bars Percent 2022 5 % to 50 % % Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Qualitative : Given Mandrels

Reinforcement Mandrel size to are not
336 steel bars Re-Bend Test IS:1786: 2008 mm N/A PermanentFacility Inadequate evidenced
24,30,32,36,40,43,48,@ except 100mm
60,80,100,10 dia.
 Reinforcement IS: 1608 (Part- Adequate
337 steel bars Reduction area 1): 2022 5 % to 80 % 0.8 % @ 33 % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Reinforcement Ultimate Tensile IS:1608(Part-1): 100 N/mm2 to 5 N/mm2 @ 585 PermanentFacility Adequate
338 steel bars Strength 2022 Adequate through adequate
900 N/mm2 N/mm2 Interviewing

Reinforcement Yield Stress/ IS:1608(Part-1): 100 N/mm2 to 5 N/mm2 @ 585 PermanentFacility Adequate
339 steel bars 0.2 proof stress 2022 Adequate through adequate
700 N/mm2 N/mm2 Interviewing

Discipline: Mechanical Group: Buildings Materials Sub Group: Tiles

IS: 13630(Part- 1.5 g/cc to 3.0 0.12 g/cc @ Adequate

340 Ceramic tiles Bulk Density 2): 2019 g/cc 2.46 g/cc PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Chemical IS: 13630(Part- Qualitative Adequate

341 Ceramic tiles Resistance 7): 2019 :Classes N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
AA,A,B,C,D Interviewing

Crazing IS: 13630(Part- Adequate

342 Ceramic tiles Resistance 9): 2019 Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Scratch IS: 13630(Part- 1 Mohs to 9 0.5 Mohs @ 4 Adequate

343 Ceramic tiles Hardness 13): 2019 Mohs Mohs PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

The laboratory
doesn't have
facilities to
Surface IS: 13630(Part- measure
344 Ceramic tiles Flatness 1): 2019 Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Inadequate ceramic tiles
surface
[Link]
as per IS
13630(part 1)

IS: 13630(Part- Adequate

345 Ceramic tiles Surface Quality 1): 2019 Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

IS: 13630(Part- 0.2 mm @ 5.0 Adequate

346 Ceramic tiles Thickness 1): 2019 2 mm to 5 mm mm PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

The laboratory
doesn't have
facilities to
IS: 13630(Part- measure
347 Ceramic tiles Warpage 1): 2019 Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Inadequate ceramic tiles
surface
[Link]
as per IS
13630(part 1)

Water IS: 13630(Part- 0.2 % @ 9.60 Adequate

348 Ceramic tiles Absorption 2): 2019 0.1 % to 30 % % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

349 Ceramic tiles Breaking IS: 13630(Part- 10 N to 600 N 8 N @ 400 N PermanentFacility Inadequate Test/Calibration
Strength 6): 2019 Witness,Inadequate

Coefficient of IS: 13630(Part- 0.000005 per K 0.0000010 per K Adequate

350 Ceramic tiles Linear 4): 2019 to 0.000009 per @ 0.000007 per PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Expansion K K Interviewing

Test/Calibration
351 Ceramic tiles Linear Thermal IS: 13630(Part- 5 X10-6Â K-1 to 0.2 X10-6Â K-1 PermanentFacility Adequate Witness,Adequate adequate
Expansion 4): 2019 10 X10-6Â K-1 @ 7 X10-6Â K-1 through
Interviewing

352 Ceramic tiles Modulus of IS: 13630(Part- 5 N/mm2 to 50 0.6 N/mm2 @ PermanentFacility Inadequate Test/Calibration
Rupture 6): 2019 N/mm2 31 N/mm2 Witness,Inadequate

Moisture IS: 13630(Part- 0.02 mm to 12 0.13 mm @ 1.6 PermanentFacility Adequate

353 Ceramic tiles Expansion 3): 2019 mm mm Adequate through Adequate
Interviewing

Resistance to IS: 13630(Part- Adequate

354 Ceramic tiles Acid & Alkali 8): 2019 Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through Adequate
Interviewing
 Thermal Shock IS: 13630(Part- Adequate
355 Ceramic tiles Resistance 5): 2019 Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing
Assessed BY :Sajulal G

Location :Location 1

Discipline: Mechanical Group: Soil and Rock Sub Group: Clays & Soils

356 Soil Plastic Limit IS: 2720(Part- 5 % to 50 % 1.89 % @ 17.45 PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
5): 1985 % Witness

California Adequate
357 Soil BearingRatio IS: 2720(Part- 3 % to 60 % 0.61 % @ 12.38 PermanentFacility Adequate through Witnessed
(C.B.R.)-Soaked 16): 1987 % Document unsoaked CBR
Review

California
358 Soil BearingRatio AASHTO T193: 3 % to 60 % 0.61 % @ 12.38 PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
(C.B.R.)- 2013 % Witness
Unsoaked

Coefficient of IS: 13326(Part- 5 deg. to 50 1 deg. @ 27 Test/Calibration

359 Soil Interface 1): 1992 deg. deg. PermanentFacility Adequate Witness
Friction

360 Soil Direct Shear IS: 2720(Part- 5 deg. 1.25 deg. @ PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
Test(fie) 13) : 1986 to 50 deg. 30.21 deg. Witness

Test/Calibration
Heavy IS: 2720(Part- 0.52 % @ 11.44 PermanentFacility Witness,Adequate
361 Soil Compaction 8): 1983 5 % to 40 % % Adequate through
OMC Document
Review

Light IS: 2720(Part- 0.15 % @ 11.63 PermanentFacility Adequate

362 Soil Compaction 7): 1980 1 % to 30 % % Adequate through
OMC Interviewing

Relative density Adequate

363 Soil of cohesionless IS: 2720(Part-- 1.25 g/cc to 2.0 0.3 g/cc @ 1.84 PermanentFacility Adequate through
soil 14): 1983 g/cc g/cc Document
Review

IS: 2720(Part- 0.04 % @ 2.80 PermanentFacility Adequate

364 Soil Relative Density 14): 1983 0.5 % to 3.0 % % Adequate through
Interviewing

Adequate
365 Soil Shrinkage Limit IS: 2720(Part-
: 1972
6) 1 % to 50 % 0.25 % @ 8.34 PermanentFacility
% Adequate through Test
demonstrated
Interviewing

Adequate
366 Soil Slope Stability IRC 75: 2015 0.5to 5.0 0.21@ 3.24 SiteFacility Adequate through File Refer NC raise
Test Review (Record in [Link].
Review)

367 Soil Tri axial shear IS: 2720(Part- 5 deg. 0.70 deg. @ PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
Test ( fie ) 11 &12): 1981 to 50 deg. 11.72 deg. Witness

Coef icient of Adequate

368 Soil permeabilityby IS: 2720(Part- 10 m/day to 50 1.7 m/day @ 39 PermanentFacility Adequate through
Constant Head 36): 1987 m/day m/day Interviewing
Method

Compression IS: 2720(Part- Adequate Long duration

369 Soil index 15): 1965 0to 1.0 0.02@ 0.5 PermanentFacility Adequate through test
Interviewing Demonstrated

0.1 X10- 0.5 X10-5cm2/s Adequate Long duration

Consolidation IS: 2720(Part- 5cm2/s to 8
370 Soil Test 15): 1965 @ 5 X10- PermanentFacility Adequate through test -
X10-5cm2/s 5cm2/s Interviewing Demonstrated

371 Soil Direct Shear IS: 2720(Part- 0.1 kg/cm² to 0.05 kg/cm² @ PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
Test ( C ) 13): 1986 1 kg/cm² 0.19 kg/cm² Witness

Dry Density- Adequate

372 Soil Core IS: 2720(Part- 1.5 g/cc to 3.0 0.17 g/cc @ SiteFacility Adequate through
CuttingMethod 29): 1975 g/cc 1.89 g/cc Document
Review

Dry Density- Adequate

373 Soil SandReplacement IS:28):
2720(Part-
1974
1.5 g/cc to 3.0
g/cc
0.18 g/cc @
1.77 g/cc SiteFacility Adequate through
Document
 Method Review

374 Soil Electricals IS: 15736: 2007 100 ohm-m to 1.2 ohm-m @ SiteFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
Resistivity Test 1500 ohm-m 660 ohm-m Witness

DIN 18134: 15 MN/m2 to 90 1.7 MN/m2 @ Adequate

375 Soil Ev2 Test 2012 SiteFacility Adequate through
MN/m2 60.9 MN/m2 Interviewing

RDSO GE-14: 15 NM/m2 to 90 1.7 NM/m2 @ Adequate

376 Soil Ev2 Test 2009 NM/m2 60.9 NM/m2 SiteFacility Adequate through
Interviewing

Adequate
377 Soil Field Moisture IS: 2720(Part- 10 % to 80 % 0.7 % @ 24 % PermanentFacility Adequate through File Refer NC raise
Equivalent 18): 1992 Review (Record in [Link].
Review)

378 Soil Free Swell IS: 2720(Part- 5 % to 70 % 0.23 % @ 11 % PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
Index 40): 1977 Witness

Grain size Adequate

379 Soil Analysis- Wet IS: 2720(Part- 0 % to 100 % 1.42 % @ 71.70 PermanentFacility Adequate through
(75 micron to 4): 1985 % Document
2.0 mm) Review

Heavy
380 Soil Compaction IS: 2720(Part- 1.5 g/cc to 2.5 0.04 g/cc @ PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
MDD 8): 1983 g/cc 1.94 g/cc Witness

Light IS: 2720(Part- 1.2 g/cc to 2.5 0.08 g/cc @ Adequate Witnessed
381 Soil Compaction 7): 1980 g/cc 1.95 g/cc PermanentFacility Adequate through heavy
MDD Interviewing compaction

Linear IS: 2720(Part-- Adequate

382 Soil Shrinkage 20): 1992 2 % to 50 % 0.8 % @ 26 % PermanentFacility Adequate through
Interviewing

Modulus Sub 3.0 kg/cm2/cm 0.2 kg/cm2/cm Test/Calibration

383 Soil Grade Reaction IS: 9214 : 1979 to 8.0 @ 4.42 SiteFacility Adequate Witness
(K-Value Test) kg/cm2/cm kg/cm2/cm

IS: 2720(Part- Adequate Refer NC raise

384 Soil Plasticity Index 5): 1985 1to 50 1.7@ 26 PermanentFacility Adequate through in [Link].
Interviewing

385 Soil Plate Load Test IS: 1888: 1982 50 kN to 1000 4.4 kN @ 135.5 SiteFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
kN kN Witness

Pull-out Adequate
386 Soil coefficient- large ASTM D 6706- 20 kN to 100 kN 1.6 kN @ 60.9 PermanentFacility Adequate through
shearbox 01: 2021 kN Document
Review

Soil Resistivity 50 ohm-m to 2.1 ohm-m @ Adequate

387 Soil Test IS: 3043: 2018 500 ohm-m 123 ohm-m SiteFacility Adequate through
Interviewing

Adequate
388 Soil Specific gravity IS: 2720(Part-- 1.96to 2.70 0.2@ 2.64 PermanentFacility Adequate through
3/sec-2): 1980 Document
Review

Standard
Penetration Test IS: 2131 (part- 10 N. value to 1.3 N. value @ Adequate
389 Soil (Soil 11) : 1993 100 N. value 57 N. value SiteFacility Adequate through
Investigation Interviewing
Test)

Tri axial shear IS: 2720(Part- 0.01 kg/cm2 to 0.07 kg/cm2 @ PermanentFacility Adequate
390 Soil Test (C) 12): 1981 Adequate through double entry
2 kg/cm2 0.36 kg/cm2 Interviewing

IS: 2720(Part- 0.41 % @ 2.84 PermanentFacility Adequate

391 Soil Water content 2): 1973 0.1 % to 30 % % Adequate through
Interviewing

Direct shear
test of soil IS 2720 (Part- 19 kPa to 65 1.5 kPa @ 34 Adequate
392 Soil Containing 39/sec-I ) : 1977 kPa kPa PermanentFacility Adequate through
Gravel Interviewing
(cohension)

Direct shear Adequate

test of soil IS 2720 (Part- 1.2 Â o @ 38 through
393 Soil Containing 39/sec-I ) : 1977 35 Â o to 55 Â o Âo PermanentFacility Adequate Document
Gravel Ø Review

394 Soil Liquid Limit IS 2720 (Part 5): 10 % to 80 % 1.14 % @ 33.36 PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
1985 % Witness

5 ×10- 0.2 ×10- Adequate

Permeability IS 2720 (Part 4cm/sec 4cm/sec through
395 Soil test 17): 1986 to 7 ×10- @ 7 ×10- PermanentFacility Adequate Document
4cm/sec 4cm/sec Review

IS 2720 (Part 5): 1.89 % @ 17.45 PermanentFacility Adequate

396 Soil Plastic Limit 1985 5 % to 50 % % Adequate through
Interviewing

397 Soil Tri-axial test, IS: 2720(Part- 10 Kg/cm to 50 0.5 Kg/cm @ 16 PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
Cohesion 12): 1981 Kg/cm Kg/cm Witness

Discipline: Mechanical Group: Soil and Rock Sub Group: Others

IS: Adequate
398 Bentonite Fineness 6186(Annexure- 50 % to 98 % 1.14 % @ 84 % PermanentFacility Adequate through
6): 1986 Interviewing

IS: Adequate
399 Bentonite Gel Formation 6186(Annexure- Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through
Index 4): 1986 Document
Review

Moisture IS: 6186, 0.25 % @ 6.60 PermanentFacility Adequate

400 Bentonite Content (Annexure-2): 5 % to 12 % % Adequate through
1986 Interviewing

IS: Adequate
401 Bentonite Sand Content 6186(Annexure- 0.1 % to 2 % 0.03 % @ 1.28 PermanentFacility Adequate through
9): 1986 % Document
Review

IS: Adequate
402 Bentonite Swelling 6186(Annexure- Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through
5): 1986 Interviewing

IS: Adequate
403 Bentonite Viscosity at 6186(Annexure- 10 Poise to 100 0.8 Poise @ 18 PermanentFacility Adequate through
30°C 7): 1986 Poise Poise Document
Review

Cement Treated Adequate

404 Sub Plastic Limit IS: 2720(Part- 5) 5 % to 50 % 1.89 % @ 17.45 PermanentFacility Adequate through
Base/Cement : 1985 %
Treated Base Interviewing

Cement Treated Adequate

405 Sub IS: 2720(Part- Refer NC raise
Base/Cement Plasticity Index 5): 1985 0to 50 1.7@ 26 PermanentFacility Adequate through
Interviewing in [Link].
Treated Base

Cement Treated Adequate

406 Sub Resilient ASTM D 4123: 300 N/mm2 to 7.5 N/mm2 @ PermanentFacility Adequate through
Base/Cement Modulus 1982 6000 N/mm2 3212 N/mm2 Document
Treated Base Review

Cement Treated Adequate

407 Sub Resilient IRC: 37: 2018 300 N/mm2 to 7.5 N/mm2 @ PermanentFacility Adequate through Refer NC raise
Base/Cement Modulus 6000 N/mm2 3212 N/mm2 Interviewing in [Link].
Treated Base

Cement Treated Unconfined Adequate

408 Sub Compressive IS: 9143: 1979 1 N/mm2 to 20 0.22 N/mm2 @ PermanentFacility Adequate through
Base/Cement Strength N/mm2 12.26 N/mm2 Interviewing
Treated Base

Cement Treated Adequate

409 Sub Liquid Limit IS: 2720(Part- 5) 10 % to 80 % 1.14 % @ 33.36 PermanentFacility Adequate through File
Base/Cement : 1985 % Review (Record
Treated Base Review)

Adequate
410 Concrete Pile Dynamic Pile IS: 2911 (Part- Qualitative :NA N/A SiteFacility Adequate through Demonstrated
Load Test 4) : 2013 Interviewing

Lateral Pile IS: 2911(Part- 4) 10 Tonne to 100 1.5 Tonne @ 40 Adequate

411 Concrete Pile Load Test : 2013 Tonne Tonne SiteFacility Adequate through Demonstrated
Interviewing
 Pile Pull out IS: 2911(Part- 4) 1 Tonne to 50 1.2 Tonne @ 36 Adequate
412 Concrete Pile Test (Clause no-9: Tonne Tonne SiteFacility Adequate through Demonstrated
2013 Document
Review
Static Pile Load IS: 2911 (Part- 100 Tonne to 1.8 Tonne @ Adequate
413 Concrete Pile Test 4) : 2013 2500 Tonne 540 Tonne SiteFacility Adequate through Demonstrated
Interviewing

IS: 2911(Part- 10 Tonne to 300 1.5 Tonne @ Adequate

414 Concrete Pile Uplift Pile load 4): 2013 Tonne 240 Tonne SiteFacility Adequate through Demonstrated
Interviewing

Granular Sub IS: 2720(Part- 0.61 % @ 12.38 PermanentFacility Adequate

415 Base CBR 16): 1987 3 % to 60 % % Adequate through
Interviewing

Granular Sub Heavy IS: 2720(Part- 0.74 % @ 11.44 PermanentFacility Adequate

416 Base Compaction - 8): 1983 5 % to 20 % % Adequate through
OMC Interviewing

Granular Sub IS: 2720(Part- 1.14 % @ 2.84 PermanentFacility Adequate

417 Base Liquid Limit 5): 1985 10 % to 80 % % Adequate through
Interviewing

Adequate
418 Granular Sub Moisture IS: 2720(Part- 0.1 % to 30 % 0.41 % @ 2.84 PermanentFacility Adequate through
Base Content 2): 2020 % Document
Review

Adequate
419 Granular Sub Plastic Limit IS: 2720(Part- 5 % to 50 % 1.89 % @ 17.45 PermanentFacility Adequate through
Base 5): 1985 % Document
Review

Heavy Adequate
420 Granular Sub Compaction - IS: 2720(Part- 1.5 g/cc to 2.5 0.04 g/cc @ PermanentFacility Adequate through
Base MDD 8): 1983 g/cc 1.94 g/cc Document
Review

Granular Sub IS: 2720(Part- Adequate Refer NC raise

421 Base Plasticity Index 5): 1985 3to 50 1.7@ 26 PermanentFacility Adequate through in [Link].
Interviewing

Water Bound IS: 2720(Part- 5) 1.14 % @ 33.36 PermanentFacility Adequate

422 Macadam Liquid Limit : 1985 10 % to 80 % % Adequate through
Interviewing

Adequate
423 Water Bound Plastic Limit IS: 2720(Part- 5 % to 50 % 1.89 % @ 17.45 PermanentFacility Adequate through
Macadam 5): 1985 % Document
Review

Water Bound IS: 2720(Part- Adequate Refer NC raise

424 Macadam Plasticity Index 5): 2020 5to 50 1.7@ 26 PermanentFacility Adequate through in [Link].
Interviewing

Wet Mix IS: 2720(Part- 1.14 % @ 33.36 PermanentFacility Adequate

425 Macadam Liquid Limit 5): 1985 10 % to 80 % % Adequate through
Interviewing

Adequate
426 Wet Mix Plastic Limit IS: 2720(Part- 5 % to 50 % 1.89 % @ 17.45 PermanentFacility Adequate through
Macadam 5): 1985 % Document
Review

Wet Mix IS: 2720(Part- Adequate Refer NC raise

427 Macadam Plasticity Index 5): 1985 0to 50 1.7@ 26 PermanentFacility Adequate through in [Link].
Interviewing

Discipline: Mechanical Group: Soil and Rock Sub Group: Stones / Rock

428 Rock Brazilian Index IS: 10082 : 1981 1 N/mm2 to 40

N/mm2
1.2 N/mm2 @
34 N/mm2 PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
Witness

429 Rock Modulus of IS: 9221: 1979 10 GPa to 80 1.6 GPa @ 48 PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
Elasticity GPa GPa Witness

Adequate
430 Rock Moisture IS: 13030 : 1991 1 % to 3 % 0.15 % @ 1.35 PermanentFacility Adequate through
Content % Document
Review

431 Rock Porosity IS: 13030: 1991 0.1 % to 0.5 % 0.07 % @ 0.25 PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
% Witness
432 Rock Slake Durability IS: 10050: 1981 0 % to 100 % 2.2 % @ 69 % SiteFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
Index Witness
Water 0.22 % @ 1.84 PermanentFacility Adequate Refer NC raise
433 Rock Absorption IS: 13030 : 1991 1 % to 3 % % Adequate through in [Link].
Interviewing

Adequate
1.5 g/cc to 3.0 0.22 g/cc @ through
434 Rock Bulk Density IS: 13030: 1991 g/cc 2.28 g/cc PermanentFacility Adequate Document
Review

Cerchar Adequate
435 Rock Abrasiveness ASTM D 7625: 0.5to 10 0.2@ 4.8 PermanentFacility Adequate through
Index 2010 Document
Review

Cerchar ASTM D7625: Test/Calibration

436 Rock Abrasiveness 2010 0.5to 10 0.2@ 4.8 PermanentFacility Adequate Witness
Index

Adequate
437 Rock Dry Density IS: 13030 : 1991 1.5 g/cc to 3 0.03 g/cc @ 1.8 PermanentFacility Adequate through
g/cc g/cc Document
Review

ASTM D 5821: Adequate

438 Rock Fractured Faces 2013 1 % to 100 % 0.5 % @ 57 % PermanentFacility Adequate through
Interviewing

Adequate
439 Rock Mohs Hardness IS:13630(Part- 1to 10 1@ 9 PermanentFacility Adequate through
13): 2019 Document
Review

440 Rock Point Load Test ASTM D 5731: 10 N/mm2 to 1.4 N/mm2 @ PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
2016 100 N/mm2 43.7 N/mm2 Witness

Adequate
441 Rock Poison Ratio IS: 9221: 1979 0.05to 0.8 0.06@ 0.6 PermanentFacility Adequate through
Document
Review

442 Rock Retained AASHTO T 283: 1 % to 100 % 0.34 % @ 65 % PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
Tensile Strength 2007 Witness

Adequate
443 Rock Specific Gravity IS: 13030 : 1991 1to 3 0.22@ 2.72 PermanentFacility Adequate through File Refer NC raise
Review (Record in [Link].
Review)

Triaxial Adequate
444 Rock Compression IS: 3047: 1965 20 Degree to 80 2 Degree @ 24 PermanentFacility Adequate through File Refer NC raise
TestUU Angle of Degree Degree Review (Record in [Link].
Internal Friction Review)

Unconfined 100 kg/cm2 to 2.45 kg/cm2 @ PermanentFacility Test/Calibration

445 Rock Compressive IS: 9143 : 1979 3000 kg/cm2 225.76 kg/cm2 Adequate Witness
Strength

Moisture 0.15 % @ 1.35 PermanentFacility Adequate Refer NC raise

446 Rock IS 13030: 1991 1.0 % to 3.0 % Adequate through
Content % Interviewing in [Link].

Discipline: Mechanical Group: Wood and Wood Products Sub Group: Others

Water IS: 2380(Part-1 0.7 % @ 8.00 Test/Calibration

447 Plywood Absorption to Part-21): 3 % to 25 % % PermanentFacility Adequate Witness
1977

448 Plywood Tensile strength IS: 1734(Part-9): 100 Kg/cm2 to 1.7 Kg/cm2 @ PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
1989 500 Kg/cm2 244 Kg/cm2 Witness

Adequate
449 Wood Identification of IS: 4970 : 1973 Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through Refer NC raised
wood Document in [Link]
Review

450 Wood Moisture IS:1708(Part-1): 1 % to 10 % 0.1 % @ 4.49 PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration

Content 1986 % Witness

451 Wood Water IS: 2380(Part- 3 % to 25 % 0.7 % @ 8.00 PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
Absorption 16): 1977 % Witness

IS: 2380(Part--1
452 Wood Density to Part-21) 0.2 g/cc to 3.0 0.07 g/cc @ 0.9 PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
(Clause 3.2.2): g/cc g/cc Witness
1977
Adequate
453 Wood Specific Gravity IS:1708(Part-2): 1to 5 0.1@ 2.8 PermanentFacility Adequate through
1989 Interviewing

Adequate
454 Wood IS: 1708(Part-1
Tensile strength to 150 Kg/cm2 to 2.6 Kg/cm2 @ PermanentFacility Adequate through
Part-2): 1977 500 Kg/cm2 200 Kg/cm2 Document
Review

Discipline: Mechanical Group: Wood and Wood Products Sub Group: Timber

Adequate
455 Timber Identification of IS: 4970 : 1973 Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through
wood Document
Review

Adequate
456 Timber Moisture IS:1708(Part-1): 1 % to 10 % 0.11 % @ 4.49 PermanentFacility Adequate through
Content 1986 % Document
Review

Adequate
Water IS: 2380(Part-1 0.7 % @ 8.00 through
457 Timber Absorption to Part-21): 3 % to 25 % % PermanentFacility Adequate Document
1977 Review

IS: 2380(Part-1 Adequate

458 Timber Density to Part-21): 0.2 g/cc to 3.0 0.07 g/cc @ 0.9 PermanentFacility Adequate through
1977 g/cc g/cc Document
Review

Adequate
459 Timber Tensile strength IS: 1708(Part-9): 150 Kg/cm2 to 2.6 Kg/cm2 @ PermanentFacility Adequate through
1989 500 Kg/cm2 200 Kg/cm2 Document
Review

Assessed BY :SALY C M

Location :Location 1

Discipline: Mechanical Group: Rubber and Rubber Products Sub Group: Others

Test/Calibration
460 Vulcanizate Compression IS:3400(Part- - 5 % to 70 % 10 % @ 60 % PermanentFacility Adequate Witness,Adequate adequate
Rubber Set 10/Sec-2): 2022 through
Interviewing

461 Vulcanizate Density ASTM D 792: 0.7 g/cc to 3.30 0.1 g/cc @ 1.2 PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
Rubber 2020 g/cc g/cc Witness

Vulcanizate ASTM D 2240: 10 SHORE A to 1.5 SHORE A Test/Calibration

462 Rubber Hardness 2015 90 SHORE A @ 48 SHORE PermanentFacility Adequate Witness
A

463 Vulcanizate Hardness IS:3400(Part- -2/ 10 HRD to 90 2.03 HRD @ 61 PermanentFacility Inadequate Equipmentnot
Rubber Sec-3): 2022 HRD HRD working.

Vulcanizate Accelerated IS:3400(Part-4): Adequate

464 Rubber Aging 2022 Qualitative :NA N/A PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Vulcanizate Compression ASTM Adequate

465 Rubber Set @70 degree D395(Method 5 % to 70 % 0.8 % @ 26 % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Celsius B): 2017 Interviewing

466 Vulcanizate Elongation at IS:3400(Part-1): 100 % to 800 % 17.87 % @ 379 PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
Rubber Break 2021 % Witness

467 Vulcanizate Tear strength ASTM D 624- 10 N/mm to 200 0.62 N/mm @ PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
Rubber 00: 2020 N/mm 20.24 N/mm Witness

468 Vulcanizate Tensile Strength IS:3400(Part- 1): 3 N/mm2 to 40 0.57 N/mm2 @ PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
Rubber 2021 N/mm2 18.27 N/mm2 Witness

Discipline: Mechanical Group: Textile Materials Sub Group: Geo Textiles

Geo Textile ASTM D 5035: Test/Calibration

469 (Woven/Non Elongation 2011 20 % to 500 % 4.0 % @ 412 % PermanentFacility Adequate Witness
Woven)

Geo Textile Adequate

470 (Woven/Non Mass Per ASTM D5261: 10 g/m2 to 500 3.3 g/m2 @ 149 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Woven) Square Meter 2010 Interviewing
g/m2 g/m2
Geo Textile Static Puncture ASTM D 6241: 1000 N to 5000 Equipment not
471 (Woven/Non Strength 2014 N 22 N @ 3400 N PermanentFacility Inadequate available
Woven)

Geo Textile ASTM D5035: 2 kN/m to 49 1.2 kN/m @ Test/Calibration

472 (Woven/Non Tensile Strength 2011 kN/m 29.5 kN/m PermanentFacility Adequate Witness
Woven)

Geo Textile Thickness ASTM D 5199: 0.5 mm to 10 0.1 mm @ 5.2 Test/Calibration

473 (Woven/Non (Single layers) 2012 mm mm PermanentFacility Adequate Witness
Woven)

Geo Textile Thickness IS: 13162(Part- 0.1 mm @ 5.2 Adequate

474 (Woven/Non (Single layers) 3): 2021 1 mm to 10 mm mm PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Woven) Interviewing

Geo Textile Water ASTM D 4491: 0.1 m/sec to 3.0 0.03 m/sec @
475 (Woven/Non Permeability by 2021 m/sec 2.1 m/sec PermanentFacility Inadequate Equipmentnotavailable
Woven) Permittivity

Geo Textile CBR Puncture ISO 12236: Adequate

476 (Woven/Non 100 N to 5000 N 13 N @ 1242 N PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Woven) Resistance 2006 Interviewing

Geo Textile ASTM D 4632: Adequate

477 (Woven/Non Grab Elongation 2015 20 % to 200 % 2.6 % @ 92 % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Woven) Interviewing

Geo Textile Grab Tensile ASTM D 4632: Test/Calibration

478 (Woven/Non Strength 2016 100 N to 2000 N 4.5 N @ 455 N PermanentFacility Adequate Witness
Woven)

Geo Textile ASTM D 4533: Adequate

479 (Woven/Non Tear test 2015 10 N to 1000 N 2.4 N @ 352 N PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Woven) Interviewing

Facility not
Geo Textile ASTM D 4491: 5 X10-6 m/s to 0.6 X10-6Â m/s PermanentFacility available and
480 (Woven/Non Water flow rate 2022 Inadequate hence
Woven) 50 X10-6Â m/s @ 8 X10-6Â m/s competencycould
not be verified

Geo Textile Apparent ASTM D4751: 40 micron to 2 micron @ 250 PermanentFacility Adequate
481 (Woven/Non opening Size 2020 300 micron micron Adequate through adequate
Woven) Interviewing

Discipline: Mechanical Group: Textile Materials Sub Group: Others

IS: 13162(Part- 0.4 mm @ 4 Adequate

482 Geo composite Thickness 3): 2021 2 mm to 10 mm mm PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Adequate
483 Geo Tear test A STM D 4533: 10 N to 700 N 2.4 N @ 352 N PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
compositeSheet 2015 Document
Review

Geo Composite Apparent ASTM D 4751 - 50 microns to 12 microns @ Adequate

484 Sheet opening Size 21a: 2021 1000 microns 162 microns PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Geo Composite ASTM D 5035: Adequate

485 Sheet Elongation 2019 10 % to 80 % 0.6 % @ 28 % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Geo composite Mass Per 100 g/m2 to 12.8 g/m2 @ Test method
486 Sheet Square Meter IS:9864: 2015 PermanentFacility Inadequate mentionedis not
3000 g/m2 1500 g/m2 appropriate

Geo Composite Mass Per ASTM D 5261: 100 g/m2 to 4.8 g/m2 @ Adequate
487 Sheet Square Meter 2018 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
3000 g/m2 1250 g/m2 Interviewing

Geo Composite Tensile Strength ASTM D 5035: 100 kN/m to 11.2 kN/m @ Adequate
488 Sheet 2019 800 kN/m 450 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
kN/m Interviewing

Geo Composite ASTM D 5199: 0.4 mm @ 4 Adequate

489 Sheet Thickness 2012 2 mm to 20 mm mm PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Geo composite Adequate

0.2 mm @ 4
490 Sheet Thickness ISO 9863: 2016 2 mm to 20 mm mm PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Geo composite CBR Puncture ISO 12236: Adequate

491 sheet Resistance 1996 100 N to 5000 N 13 N @ 1242 N PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Geo composite Grab Tensile ASTM D 4632: 5 kN/m to 49 1.2 kN/m Adequate
492 Sheet Strength 2015 kN/m @ 32 kN/m PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Geo composite Tensile Strength ISO 10319: 20 kN/m to 800 11.2 kN/m @ Adequate
493 Sheet 2015 kN/m 450 kN/m PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Geo Mega Mass per unit ASTN D5261: 70 g/m2 to 150 5 g/m2 @ 125 Adequate
494 Sleeve Area 2010 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
g/m2 g/m2 Interviewing

Geo Mega Dimensions ASTM D2561: 5 mm to 150 1.32 mm @ The test method
495 Sleeve (Thickness & 2010 mm 15.58 mm PermanentFacility Inadequate mentionedis not
Width) appropriate.

Geo Mega Strength test of ASTM E72: 50 N/mm2 to 2.8 N/mm2 @ Adequate
496 Sleeve Panel 2015 400 N/mm2 160 N/mm2 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Equipmentnot
497 Geocell Carbon black ASTM D 4218: 1.0 % to 5 % 0.2 % @ 2.80 PermanentFacility Inadequate availablefor the
content 2020 % performanceof
the test.

Local ISO 13426

498 Geocell overstressing (Part-- 1) 100 N to 8000 N 8 N @ 1280 N PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
test (Method -D): Witness
2000

IS:O
499 Geocell Peeling test 13426(Part-1) 100 N to 1000 N 6 N @ 260 N PermanentFacility Adequate Test/Calibration
(Method -B): Witness
2000

ISO 13426(Part- Test/Calibration

500 Geocell Splitting test 1) (Method C): 100 N to 3000 N 19 N @ 1800 N PermanentFacility Adequate Witness
2000

ASTM D 5199- 0.3 mm @ 6 Adequate

501 Geocell Thickness 12: 2019 1 mm to 20 mm mm PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Geogrid / The test method

502 Polymer/ Geo- Aperture Size ASTM D5261- 10 mm to 50 0.6 mm @ 13 PermanentFacility Inadequate mentionedfor
Strap 10: 2019 mm mm aperturesize is
not adequate.

The test method

503 Geogrid/Polymer Aperture Size ASTM D5261: 5 mm to 100 0.6 mm @ 13 PermanentFacility Inadequate mentionedfor
2010 mm mm aperturesize is
not adequate.

ASTM D 6637: Adequate

504 Geogrid/Polymer Elongation 2015 50 % to 300 % 3.8 % @ 280 % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Mass Per ASTM D 5261: 300 g/m2 to 2.2 g/m2 @ 512 PermanentFacility Adequate
505 Geogrid/Polymer Square Meter 2019 Adequate through adequate
2000 g/m2 g/m2 Interviewing

Geogrid/Polymer/Geo-Mass Per ASTM D5261: 100 g/m2 to 5 g/m2 @ 515 Adequate

506 Strap Square Meter 2018 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
2000 g/m2 g/m2 Interviewing

Geogrid/Polymer/Geo- ASTM D 6637: 10 N/mm2 to 3.3 N/mm2 @ Adequate

507 Strap Tensile strength 2019 500 N/mm2 253 N/mm2 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Geogrid/Polymer/Geo-Elongation ASTM D6637- Adequate

508 Strap 15: 2006 5 % to 100 % 3.8 % @ 80 % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Adequate
509 Para web Elongation ASTM D 6637: 10 % to 200 % 2.35 % @ 112 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
2019 % Interviewing

ASTM D 6637: 5 N/mm2 to 500 3.2 N/mm2 @ Adequate

510 Para web Tensile strength 2019 N/mm2 144 N/mm2 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing
IS: 13360(Part- Adequate
511 Separation Dart Impact 5/Sec-6) 200 N to 1350 N 1.9 N @ 450 N PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Membrane Strength (Method-B): Interviewing
1999

Separation Elongation at IS: 13360(Part- Adequate

512 Membrane Break 5/Sec- 3): 2022 50 % to 1000 % 2.6 % @ 550 % PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
Interviewing

Repetition, as
the method for
Adequate Elongationat
513 Separation Elongation at IS: 13360(Part- 50 % to 1000 % 2.6 % @ 550 % PermanentFacility Adequate through break is IS
Membrane Break 5/Sec-1): 2021 Document 13360(part.5/sec.3)
Review which is already
available in the
applied scope.

Separation IS: 13360(Part- 100 kg/cm2 to 2.6 kg/cm2 @ Adequate

514 Membrane Tensile Strength 5/Sec- 3): 2022 PermanentFacility Adequate through adequate
350 kg/cm2 190 kg/cm2 Interviewing

Repetition, as
the method for
Adequate Tensile Strength
Separation IS: 13360(Part- 100 Kg/cm2 to 2.6 Kg/cm2 @ through is IS
515 Membrane Tensile Strength 5/Sec-1): 2021 PermanentFacility Adequate
350 Kg/cm2 190 Kg/cm2 Document 13360(part.5/sec.3),whic
Review is
alreadyavailableinthe
appliedscope.

Separation Thickness of 50 Micron to 2 Micron @ 100 PermanentFacility Adequate

516 Membrane Sheet IS:2508: 2019 500 Micron Micron Adequate through adequate
Interviewing