0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views34 pages

Research Proposal Guidelines for Medicine

Uploaded by

nam dinh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views34 pages

Research Proposal Guidelines for Medicine

Uploaded by

nam dinh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Research Method

Research Project Plan and Proposal

© University of Cambridge
[email protected]
School of Medicine - VNU, May 21st, 2024 Lecturer: Tu Ha
Outline 1

I. Research proposal and research topic selection

II. Research proposal structure

III. What makes a good research proposal

IV. Dos and Don’ts


I. Research Proposal 2

Research
Obtain
Questions/
answers
Problems

Research Proposal
• Overall plan, strategy, and structure
• Outline various tasks (to fulfill the research
objectives, test hypotheses)
• state the reasons for undertaking the study
I. Research Proposal 3

• Detailed operational plan


• Must provide:
what you are proposing to do;
how you plan to find answers to what you are proposing;
why you selected the proposed strategies for investigation.
I. Research topic selection 4

- a question and an
educated guess of answer
- right questions to ask?
 formulating interesting,
productive research topics?
I. Research topic selection 5

Focused vs. Extended


• Like a beam of light, research can be focused more or less sharply
• The choice of focus can be a key to determining how fruitful the investigation
turns out to be
• The topical focus must be clear and sharp
Example:
i.) investigating the effect of transporters on oral bioavailability
ii.) investigating the effect of efflux transporters on oral bioavailability
I. Research topic selection 6

Novel vs. Grounded


• Different experiment set-up novelty  if the difference is not in some key variable/
variables that are essential to the result
• While research must be novel to merit attention and funding, it must also be well-
grounded in established scientific knowledge
• The literature review section of a research proposal:
- Convince reviewers of how well-grounded and how novel the proposed research is;
- Literature search helps select an adequately grounded while interestingly novel
research topic.
• Example:
i.) investigating the effect of efflux transporters on oral bioavailability on MDCK cell line
ii.) investigating the effect of efflux transporters on oral bioavailability on cBRCP knock-
out MDCK cell line
I. Research topic selection 7

Feasible vs. Challenging


• a research topic to be realistically undertaken and completed with the time and
resources available  matter of being grounded
- A topic has to be scientifically feasible
- The feasibility must be practical as well
• The project should be a challenge to carry out, both intellectually and practically
- The resources to be of the most effective and productive use
- The intellectual challenge to produce the most exciting results
Example:
i.) optimising spray-drying conditions for black pepper extract in Southern Vietnam
I. Research topic selection 8

Theoretical vs. Empirical


• A common criticism of a research proposal that is inadequately grounded in a
theoretical framework (“fishing expedition”)
• Lack of explaining the purpose or the significance of the effort except for
characterising the phenomena to be studied as important

Short-term vs. Long-term prospects


An exciting research topic is one that:
• Present results that open up new avenues for further research
• Provide the basis for a later proposal for renewed support
I. Research topic selection 9

Asking questions

• Why have I decided to do some research?


• How can I remain interested in my research?
• How do I choose a research method?
• What personal characteristics do I have which might help me to complete my
research?
• What skills and experience do I have which might help in my research?
I. Research topic selection 10

Understand the five “Ws”

“optimising spray-drying conditions for black pepper extract in Southern Vietnam”


I. Research topic selection 11

Summarise your research


• Try to sum up your proposed project in one sentence
• Discuss your sentence with your tutor or boss and revise if there is any confusion

Statement: I’d like to perform a project focusing on spray-drying black pepper


extract in Southern Vietnam
II. Research proposal structure 12

Contents of a proposal
• Title
• Background
• Aims and objectives
• Methodology
• Timetable
• Budget and resources
• Citation
II. Research proposal structure 13

(Wetting angle)
II. Research proposal structure 14
Title: Short & explanatory
Background: The reader should know what the proposal is about, why it is worth
reading, and how you’ll build your research

✓ What? Be specific about the topic of the paper, introduce the background, and
define key terms/concepts

✓ Why? This is the most important, but also the most difficult, part of the introduction.
Try to provide brief answers to the following questions: What new material or insight are
you offering? What important issues does your research help define or answer?

✓ How? To let the reader know what to expect from the rest of the paper, the
introduction should include a “map” of what will be discussed, briefly presenting the key
elements of the paper in chronological order
II. Research proposal structure 15.1

Background
• WHAT - WHY – HOW: this project is undertaken and the need for this project
II. Research proposal structure 15.2

Background
• WHAT - WHY – HOW: this project is undertaken and the need for this project
II. Research proposal structure 16
II. Research proposal structure 17
II. Research proposal structure 18

Aims and Objectives


• depending on the project format (1 - 2 aims and no objectives) OR (1 – 2 aims and
specific objectives)

AIM

OBJECTIVES
II. Research proposal structure 19

• Method: describe your proposed


research methodology and
methods and justify their use.
- Why have you decided upon your
methodology?
- Why have you decided to use those
particular methods?
- Why are other methods not
appropriate?
II. Research proposal structure 20.1

• Method
II. Research proposal structure 20.2

• Method
II. Research proposal structure 20.3

• Method
II. Research proposal structure 20.4

• Method
II. Research proposal structure 20.5

• Method
II. Research proposal structure 20.6

• Method
II. Research proposal structure 21

• Timetable: A detailed timetable scheduling all aspects of the research


II. Research proposal structure 22

• Timetable: A detailed timetable scheduling all aspects of the research


II. Research proposal structure 23

• Budget and Resources:


II. Research proposal structure 24

• Citation/References
- Citation machines – Zotero, Endnote, Mendeley
- Check citation style: Faculty of Pharmacy – Vancouver with “[..]”
III. What makes a good proposal? 25

• Relevance, either to the work of the funding body or to the student’s course.
• The research is unique or offers new insight or development.
• The title, aims, and objectives are all clear and succinct.
• Comprehensive background research and literature review have been provided.
• There is a good match between the issues to be addressed and the approach to
be adopted.
• The researcher demonstrates relevant background knowledge and/or experience
• Timetable, resources, and budget have all been worked out thoroughly, with
most eventualities covered.
• Useful policy and practice implications.
IV. Why proposal fails? 26

• Aims and objectives are unclear or vague


• There is a mismatch between the approach being adopted and the issues
• to be addressed
• The overall plan is too ambitious and difficult to achieve in the timescale
• The researcher does not seem to have conducted enough in-depth background
research
• The problem is of insufficient importance
• Information about the data collection method is insufficiently detailed
• Information about the data analysis method is insufficiently detailed.
• The timescale is inappropriate or unrealistic
• Resources and budget have not been carefully thought out.
• This topic has been done too many times before
Summary 27

• Careful selection of research topic (different dimensions to be considered)

• Well-structured proposal with detailed information explaining the need to

carry out the research project

• Well-written background knowledge and suitable adoption of research

methods to achieve previously outlined aims

• It’s all about research and writing skill with no grammatical and spelling

errors.

• Plagiarism!!

You might also like