1 Julian- Jonathan : Ramirez

2 c/o 4154 w 24th st.

3 Chicago, Illinois Republic
4 Julian- Jonathan : Ramirez, IN PRO PER
5
6 IN THE 5TH MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY,
7 ILLINOIS
8

9 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) CIRCUIT COURT OF

10 COUNTY OF COOK ) COOK COUNTY
11 )
12 Plaintiff )
) Case No.: 23500213701
13 Vs. )
) AND ALL ASSOCIATED CASE NO.
14
) WITH THIS MATER
15 JULIAN JONATHAN RAMIREZ
)
16 ) Date: Dec. 26, 2023
)
17 Defendant in Error )
18 ___________________________________ ) ___________________________________
19

20 AFFIDAVIT OF FACT, REVOCATION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY AND SURRENDER

21 OF THE ALLEGED DEFENDANT / LEGAL PERSON / LEGAL ENTITY,
22 “JULIAN JONATHAN RAMIREZ”
23

24

25 COMES NOW, affiant, Julian Jonathan of the family Ramirez, to this COURT, being first duly
26 sworn upon his oath, deposes and says:

28 AFFIDAVIT OF FACT
29 NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL.
30 NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT.

31

1
32 Affiant, Julian Jonathan of the family Ramirez, as a self-aware, living man, hereby affirms that I
33 am not JULIAN JONATHAN RAMIREZ. It is a “fictitious entity”. I declare that I am Julian
34 Jonathan of the family Ramirez, a sovereign, living and breathing man, and not the LEGAL
35 ENTITY / LEGAL FICTION / LEGAL PERSON, “JULIAN JONATHAN RAMIREZ”.

36 Let it be known to all who call themselves “government”, their courts, agents, and any and all
37 other parties, that I, Julian Jonathan of the family Ramirez, am a natural, freeborn, sovereign
38 individual without subjects. I am neither subject to any entity anywhere nor is any entity subject
39 to me. I do not dominate anyone nor am I dominated by anyone.
40
41 I DO NOT recognize and cannot be held in contempt of any law that cannot show a named
42 individual victim(s), nor can I be held liable in contempt of any law that cannot show any
43 property that has been stolen or damaged from any said individual or individuals. As the state
44 itself is not a person, nor a corporation itself can be represented as a single person, the state
45 cannot represent itself as a property holder nor as an individual person whom is filing a
46 complaint of stolen property or of physical damage done to itself by a third party. Where no
47 individual victim and no property stolen or damaged can be found, there can be no defendant nor
48 prosecutor logically taken into consideration. See “Corpus Delicti- People v. Lopez”
49
50 I AM NOT a person as defined in statutes when such definition includes artificial entities. I
51 refuse to be treated as a federally or state-created entity which is only capable of exercising
52 certain rights, privileges, or immunities as specifically granted by federal or state “governments”.
53
54 Since the Constitution is the supposed Supreme Law of the Land, from which all law derives,
55 please show me evidence that I signed and contractually agreed to be bound to any state or
56 federal constitutions. The Declaration of Independence states that the government derives its
57 power from the consent of the governed, yet I do not consent. I only operate or follow orders
58 under duress and threats.
59
60 Under duress, I may choose to comply with the “laws” which others attempt to impose upon me,
61 but neither such “laws” nor their enforcers have any authority over me. I am not in any
62 jurisdiction for I am not of subject status.

2
63
64 Unless I have willfully harmed or violated someone or someone’s property without their consent,
65 I have not committed any crime and am, therefore, not subject to any penalty.
66
67 Thus, be it known to all, I reserve my natural right not to be compelled to perform under any
68 contract that I did not enter into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. Furthermore, I do not
69 accept the liability associated with the compelled and pretended benefit of any hidden or
70 unrevealed contract or commercial agreement.
71
72 As such, the hidden or unrevealed contracts that supposedly create obligations to perform for
73 persons of subject status are inapplicable to me and are null and void. If I have participated in
74 any of the supposed benefits associated with these hidden contracts, I have done so under duress
75 for lack of any other practical alternative. I may have received such benefits, but I have not
76 accepted them in a manner that binds me to anything.
77
78 Any such participation does not constitute acceptance because of the absence of full disclosure
79 of any valid offer and voluntary consent without misrepresentation or coercion. Without a valid
80 voluntary offer and acceptance knowingly entered into by both parties, there is no “meeting of
81 the minds” and, therefore, no valid contract. Any supposed contract is, therefore, void from the
82 beginning.
83
84 Ever since the day I was born, and to the date affixed below, I have never signed any contract
85 knowingly, willingly, voluntarily, intelligently and intentionally whereby I have waived any of
86 my natural inherent rights, and, as such, take notice that I revoke, cancel, and make void from the
87 beginning my signature on any and all contracts, agreements, forms, or any instrument which
88 may be construed in any way to give any agency or department of any government any authority,
89 venue, or jurisdiction over me.
90
91 Typical examples of such compelled and pretended benefits are:
92

3
 93 1. Birth Certificate: The fact that a “birth certificate” was issued to me by a local hospital
94 or government agency when I was born is irrelevant to my sovereignty. No status, high or
95 low, can be assigned to another person through a piece of paper without the recipient’s
96 full knowledge and consent; therefore, such a piece of paper provides the day and place
97 information only. It indicates nothing about jurisdiction, nothing about property
98 ownership, nothing about civil rights, and nothing about subject status. The only
99 documents that can have any significance, as it concerns my status in society, are those
100 that I have signed as an adult with full knowledge and consent, free from
101 misrepresentation, duress, or coercion of any kind. The issuance of a Birth Certificate
102 directly violates the 13th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The numbers displayed on
103 the back of the Social Security card represent that the said person is property of a Reserve
104 Bank. When people’s very lives are made into contracted bonds or collateral, it is
105 internationally recognized as slavery. Furthermore, the numbers found on the Birth
106 Certificate also cite a connection with the Federal Reserve Bank and can be issued as a
107 collateral bank note/Bond (guaranteed by a person’s ability to pay taxes and/or create
108 credit) which constitutes another entity having ownership over another human life (i.e.,
109 “slavery”). According to Black’s Law Dictionary, slavery is defined as: “A person who is
110 wholly subject to the will of another; one who has no freedom of action but whose person
111 and services are wholly under the control of another.” “One who is under the power of a
112 master, and who belongs to him; so that the master may sell and dispose of his person, of
113 his industry, and of his labor without his being able to do anything, have anything, or
114 acquire anything but what must belong to his master.” Civ. Code La. art. 35.
115 Furthermore, I cannot find any justification in having a Birth Certificate that is issued and
116 owned by a bank or corporate entity, nor can I find legal justification that does not violate
117 the 13th Amendment to allow for the taxation of labor or to restrict a business from
118 allowing a man born in the land mass known as the “United States” from working in his
119 business without a government-issued Social Security card or government-issued Birth
120 Certificate. The Social Security Administration also has no lawful ability to contract with
121 a minor.
122

4
123 2. The use of national currency to discharge my debts: I have used these only because
124 there is no other widely recognized currency. For the courts to ask me to pay them in
125 Federal Reserve notes is in direct violation of Article I Section X Clause I of the
126 constitution for the united states of America which states that only gold and silver can be
127 legal tender. For the courts to ask me to pay with anything other than such is treasonous.
128
129 3. The use of a driver’s license: There is no real need for me to have such a license for
130 traveling in a car; however, if I am stopped for any reason and found to be without a
131 “license”, it is likely I would be unduly harassed and penalized. Therefore, under duress,
132 I may carry a “license” only to avoid extreme inconvenience. “Driving” is defined as
133 engaging in commerce on the highway (i.e., buying and selling such as a taxi service or a
134 delivery driver); so, if one does not engage in commerce, there is no need for any license,
135 or indeed any license available to travel as it would be equivalent to requiring permission
136 to engage in the lawful activity of traveling. Traveling is not legally defined.
137 “The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property
138 thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may
139 prohibit or permit at will, but a common law right which he has under the right to life,
140 liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579.
141
142 4. The use of a passport: Similarly, there is no real need for me to have a passport (or
143 other associated permits, visas, etc.) to travel. I have the right to travel without hindrance
144 wherever, however, and whenever I wish so long as I do not infringe upon the private
145 property or rights of others. Though without a passport, my right to travel is unduly
146 hindered. Therefore, under duress, I may only use a passport to prevent extreme
147 inconvenience and to ensure that I can travel from one country to another without issue.
148
149 5. Past filing of tax returns: Because such tax returns were filed under threat, duress, and
150 coercion, and no two-way contract was ever signed with full disclosure, there is nothing
151 in any past filing of tax returns or payments that created any valid contract; therefore, no
152 obligation on my part was ever created.

5
153 “There is a clear distinction in this particular case between an individual and a
154 corporation, and the latter has no right to refuse to submit its books and papers for an
155 examination at the suit of the state. The individual may stand upon his constitutional
156 rights as a natural person. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way.
157 His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such duty to the State since he receives
158 nothing therefrom beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as
159 existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the State and can
160 only be taken from him by due process of law and in accordance with the constitution.
161 Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself and the immunity of himself and his
162 property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the
163 public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.” Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 at
164 47 (1905).
165
166 6. Citizenship: Any document I may have ever signed in which I answered “yes” to the
167 question, “Are you a United States citizen?”, cannot be used to compromise my status as
168 a sovereign or obligate me to perform in any manner. This is because, without full written
169 disclosure of the definition and consequences of such supposed “citizenship” provided in
170 a document bearing my signature given freely without misrepresentation or coercion,
171 there can be no binding contract.
172 I AM NOT a United States citizen. I am not a resident of, an inhabitant of, a franchise of,
173 a subject of, a ward of, the property of, the chattel of, or subject to the jurisdiction of any
174 monarch or any corporate commonwealth, federal state, territory, county, council, city,
175 municipal body politic, or other government allegedly created under the authority of a
176 constitution or other enactment. I am not subject to any legislation, department, or agency
177 created by such authorities or to the jurisdiction of any employees, officers, or agents
178 deriving their authority therefrom. None of the statutes or regulations of such
179 “authorities” apply to me nor have any jurisdiction over me. Further, I am not a subject of
180 any courts or bound by precedents of any courts deriving their jurisdiction from said
181 “authorities”. Take notice that I hereby cancel and make void from the beginning any
182 such instrument or any presumed “election” made by any government or any agency or
183 department thereof and that I am not and never have voluntarily elected to be treated as a

6
184 subject of any monarch or a United States citizen or a resident of any commonwealth,
185 state, territory, possession, instrumentality, enclave, division, district, or province, subject
186 to their jurisdiction(s).
187
188 7. Use of semantics: There are some immature people with mental imbalances, such as
189 the craving to dominate other people, who masquerade as government and call the noises
190 and scribbles that emanate from their mouths and pens “the law” which must be obeyed.
191 Just because they alter definitions of words in their law dictionaries to their supposed
192 advantage doesn’t mean I accept those definitions. The fact that they define the words
193 ‘person’, ‘address’, ‘mail’, ‘resident’, ‘motor vehicle’, ‘driving’, ‘passenger’, ‘employee’,
194 ‘income’, and many others in ways different from the common usage so to be associated
195 with a subject or slave status means nothing in real life.
196 Because the courts have become entangled in the game of semantics, be it known to all
197 courts and all parties that if I have ever signed any document or spoken any words on
198 record, using words defined by twists in any “law” books different from the common
199 usage, there can be no effect whatsoever on my sovereign status in society thereby nor
200 can there be created any obligation to perform in any manner by the mere use of such
201 words. Where the definition in the common dictionary differs from the definition in the
202 “law” dictionary, it is the definition in the common dictionary that prevails because it is
203 more trustworthy.
204
205 Such compelled and supposed benefits include but are not limited to the typical examples. My
206 use of such alleged benefits is under duress only and is with full reservation of all my natural,
207 inherent rights. I have waived none of my intrinsic rights and/or freedoms by my use thereof.
208 Furthermore, my use of such compelled benefits may be temporary until alternatives become
209 available, practical, and widely recognized.
210
211 My affidavit unrefuted stands as truth. “Court of appeals may not assume the truth of allegations
212 in a pleading which are contradicted by affidavit where affidavits are directly conflicting on
213 material points. It is not possible for the district judge to weigh the affidavits in order to resolve
214 disputed issues; except in those rare cases where the facts alleged in an affidavit are inherently

7
215 incredible and can be so characterized solely by a reading of the affidavit, the district judge has
216 no basis for a determination of credibility.” – Data Disc, INC. v. System Tech Assocs., INC., 557
217 F.2d 1280 (9th Cir. 1977)
218 “Moreover, Poole’s claim is sufficiently pleaded to satisfy the pleading requirements in Rule
219 32.3 and Rule 32.6(b), and his factual allegations were unrefuted by the state; therefore, they
220 must be accepted as true.” See Bates v. State, 620 So.2d 745. 746 (Ala. Crim. App 1992) (*
221 When the States does not respond to a petitioner’s allegations, the refuted statement of facts must
222 be taken as true.), Quoting Smith v. State, 581 So.2d 1283, 1284 (Ala. Crim. App 1991).
223
224 1B: REVOCATION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY
225
226 I hereby revoke, rescind, cancel, and make void from the beginning all powers of attorney, in
227 fact or otherwise, implied in “law” or otherwise, signed either by me or anyone else, as it
228 pertains to any tax file/identification number and/or social security number assigned to me, as it
229 pertains to my birth certificate, and as it pertains to any and all other numbers, licenses,
230 certificates, and other instruments issued by any and all government and quasi-governmental
231 departments or agencies due to the use of various elements of fraud by said agencies to attempt
232 to deprive me of my sovereignty and/or property.
233
234 I hereby waive, cancel, repudiate, and refuse to knowingly accept any alleged benefit or gratuity
235 associated with any of the aforementioned numbers, licenses, certificates, and other instruments.
236 My use of any such numbers, licenses, certificates, or other instruments has been for information
237 purposes only and does not grant any jurisdiction to anyone.
238

239 I do hereby revoke and rescind all powers of attorney, in fact, or otherwise, signed by me or
240 otherwise, implied in “law” or otherwise, with or without my consent or knowledge, as it
241 pertains to any and all property, real or personal, corporeal or incorporeal, obtained in the past,
242 present, or future. I am the sole and absolute owner and possess allodial title to any and all such
243 property.
244

8
245 Take notice that I also revoke, cancel, and make void from the beginning all powers of attorney,
246 in fact, in presumption, or otherwise, signed either by me or anyone else, claiming to act on my
247 behalf with or without my consent as such power of attorney pertains to me or any property
248 owned by me, by, but not limited to, any and all quasi/colorable, public, governmental
249 departments, agencies, or corporations on the grounds of constructive fraud, concealment, and
250 non-disclosure of pertinent facts.
251

252 1C: SURRENDER OF THE ALLEGED DEFENDANT / LEGAL PERSON / LEGAL ENTITY,
253 “JULIAN JONATHAN RAMIREZ”

254

255 I, Julian Jonathan of the family Ramirez, the living man on the land, hereby surrender the
256 LEGAL ENTITY, “JULIAN RAMIREZ”, “JULIAN J RAMIREZ”, and/or “JULIAN
257 JONATHAN RAMIREZ” by way of a certified copy of “BIRTH CERTIFICATE”
258 #11220046045237 to this COURT in order to satisfy this matter as well as satisfy any warrant
259 for “JULIAN JONATHAN RAMIREZ” which a certified copy is hereby attached to.

260 Affiant, Julian Jonathan of the family Ramirez, hereby demands that the COURT and/or
261 presiding JUDGE remove any so-called warrant for the living man, Julian Jonathan of the family
262 Ramirez.

263 The foregoing instrument is being executed under the hand and seal of the self-aware, living man
264 and is a voluntary act of my free-will and Deed, so help me, God.

265

266 EVENT OF DEFAULT

267 The prosecution/plaintiff hereby has ten (10) days from the recording of this Affidavit to
268 respond, rebut, or deny all these claims point-for-point. General acquiescence or non-response
269 after the allotted time frame will constitute formal agreement and acceptance with all of the
270 aforementioned. The prosecution/plaintiff will have admitted that there is no cause of action and
271 that no valid claim has been presented upon which relief can be granted.
272 Further Affiant sayeth not!

9
273 Respectfully submitted without prejudice,
274 ______JULIAN JONATHAN RAMIREZ______ Dated:___________________________
275 JULIAN JONATHAN RAMIREZ, Defendant in Error
276 In Pro Per,
277
278

279 Respectfully submitted without prejudice,

280 _____________________________________Dated:_____________
281 Julian Jonathan of the family Ramirez
282 Self-aware, living man by special appearance
283 Affiant, Attorney in Fact
284

285

286

287

288

289

290

291

292

293

294

295

296

297

298

299

300

301

302

10
303 Witnesses
304
305 _______________________________ _____________________________
306 Witness Signature # 1 Printed Name
307
308 _______________________________ _____________________________
309 Witness Signature # 2 Printed Name
310
311 NOTICE
312
313 Using a notary on this document does not constitute any adhesion, nor does it alter my status in
314 any manner. The purpose for notarization is verification and identification only and not for
315 entrance into any foreign jurisdiction.
316
317
318 Cook County )
319 ) ss. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
320 Illinois )
321
322
323 On this ______ day of ____________________, 20____ before me, the undersigned Notary,
324 personally appeared Julian Jonathan of the family Ramirez, known to me to be the above-signed
325 affiant and has acknowledged to me that he has executed the same.
326
327
328 Notary Signature: _________________________
329
330 Printed Name: ____________________________
331
332 My commission expires:____________________
333
334
335 Notary Seal: ______________________________

11