Nick Baigent/Intro micro/SS2006
Consumer Equilibrium
Optimal choice of bundle
y
y*
x x*
Utility Maximization subject to a budget constraint Equilibrium bundle: slopes of IC and BC are equal MRS = Px/Py
Nick Baigent/Intro micro/SS2006
In Equilibrium: Slope of BC = slope IC
px MU x = MRS = py MU y
MU x MU y = px py
Alternative/equivalent characterisation of consumer equilibrium.
Nick Baigent/Intro micro/SS2006
MU x MU y Suppose > px py
8 4 > 1 2
1 less y utility falls by 4 2 more euros to spend on x buy 2 more x utility goes up by 16 net increase in utility of 12 If LHS falls and RHS goes up to give an equality, then we have an equilibrium.
Nick Baigent/Intro micro/SS2006
Changes in consumer equilibrium
y
income consumption cuve for normal goods
x y
income consumption cuve for y normal and x inferior
Nick Baigent/Intro micro/SS2006
Engel curve for normal good
m
Engel curve for inferior good
m
Nick Baigent/Intro micro/SS2006
Price consumption curve
y
Price consumption curve
x y
Nick Baigent/Intro micro/SS2006
Compensating change in income
BC2 after price fall
BC1 BC3 after compensation to original IC
Nick Baigent/Intro micro/SS2006
x S
I
substitution effect S (original IC)
income effect I (higher IC)
total change in demand for x from a fall in its price.
Nick Baigent/Intro micro/SS2006
Summary
Subst Effect: relative price change with const utility Substitution Effect must always be negative: More x from lower relative price of x. Income Effect: effect of having more (less) money because of price change. Income effect can be positive or negative: Remember slope of income consumption curve. Therefore, the total effect can be positive or negative. So if price goes down, demand may go up or down!
Nick Baigent/Intro micro/SS2006
Giffen Good
y
Can we explain Giffen goods using income and substitution effects?
10
Nick Baigent/Intro micro/SS2006
S I
For a Giffen good: Income effect must be negative inferior good Income effect must be larger than subst effect For Giffen goods, demand curve slopes up! Price change leads to switching income to higher quality goods
11
Nick Baigent/Intro micro/SS2006
Allocation of time
Work or leisure Work gives more income and more consumption More work more consumption less leisure Less work less consumption more leisure
leisure
consumption Leisure normal good ----- Work inferior good Wage increase --- more consumption Wage increase --- more leisure Wage increase --- less work So work may be an inferior or Giffen good!
12
Nick Baigent/Intro micro/SS2006
Summary and Conclusions
Subst effect must be negative Income effect positive or negative Giffen: Income effect is opposite in sign to and larger than Subst effect Assumptions giving standard indifference curves are not enough to make sure dcurve slopes down.
13