0% found this document useful (0 votes)
111 views3 pages

Tunnel Design & Failure Mechanisms

The document discusses different tunneling methods for various ground conditions including soft ground, mixed rock, and hard rock tunneling. It covers factors like depth, stress levels, rock strength, jointing, and failure modes. Numerical modeling approaches are also presented for analyzing stress changes, failure propagation, and structural support design.

Uploaded by

Louis Brighton
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
111 views3 pages

Tunnel Design & Failure Mechanisms

The document discusses different tunneling methods for various ground conditions including soft ground, mixed rock, and hard rock tunneling. It covers factors like depth, stress levels, rock strength, jointing, and failure modes. Numerical modeling approaches are also presented for analyzing stress changes, failure propagation, and structural support design.

Uploaded by

Louis Brighton
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Tunnel Design

Soft Ground Tunneling


Mixed Rock Tunneling Hard Rock Tunneling
(Soft Ground Tunneling)

Shallow Ground Relatively Deep Numerical modeling can Reduced Rock Head Rock cover Rock cover
(low in-situ stress) Ground (Less than one tunnel span) about one tunnel span much greater than one span
also be used but the
(High in-situ stress)
construction method/
In-situ Stress is generally low, Mohr-coulomb failure criteria sequence have to be
the ground movement controls can be used for stress analysis Ground movement & Stress Ground movement & Stress Stress-induced failure
the tunnel design. change in foundation is change in foundation is around Tunnel is critical
Stress change in foundation is needed to be considered needed to be considered
Stress change in foundation is needed to be considered Complicated by the scale
needed to be considered Numerical method can be Numerical method & Q- effect and relative block
used system size of joints and opening

Kinematic and stress failure Relevant theory: Failure Mechanisms


may be possible Arching theory, NATM depend on Relative Stress
method and Strength Ratio of Rock
Mass

Affected by Ductility and


Stress Strain Behaviour of
Rock Mass

Q-system and Numerical


method not easy to be used
Factors controlling Failure
Mechanisms

In-situ Stress/Ko Rock mass strength Rock mass Characteristic Shape of opening/location
properties e.g UCS around opening
Joint Characteristic
RMR/GSI

Failure modes classification


by Derek Martin

Low in-situ stress High in-situ stress

Stress-induced failure Kinematic and stress-


Intermediate in-situ induced Failure are Kinematic failure controls
controls
stress possible;difficult to analyze

Kinematic Failure controls Kinematic Failure & Stress-induced Failure


(Wedge/ Block failure) Stress-induced Failure controls
(Sliding and Rotation)

Scale effect -> diificult to get


the intact behavior
use UNWEDGE use UNWEDGE & Numerical model- Numerical modeling
ing with caution if there are a few set
of joint since the numerical model
cannot change the stiffness/open up
crack during analysis. Therefore, it is Check Mogi's line
hard to predict the propagation of i.e. sigma 1> 3.4 sigma3
failure No
Yes

Brittle failure is expected Ductile Behavior is expected

if the rock block is small Hoek and Brown Criteria is


compared to the structure, it not applicable Not the case in HK
can assume isotropic and
homogeneous, Hoek and Rock bursting problem is
Brown Criteria is applicable expected
Moderate good rock
with limited movement

Drill & Blast TBM tunnel with EBP


and use of Ground Convergence - and use of lining support
Support Reaction is applicable
Numerical modeling of tunnel

Modeling based on Modeling based on soil-structure


Structural approach interaction approach

step 1

Spring Constant Max in-situ stress Different Load [Link] amount of tunnel wall
Wall load/Crown
for soil and rock in vertical and Pattern and deformation prior to support installation
load obtained by
obtained by RMR horizontal Combination
Q-system
direction (Ko)
Use 2D FEM software (Plan Strain Condition) Use 3D FEM software Field oberservation
with empirical equations
(e.g. Vlachopulos and Diederichs - plastic
ground)
Check M&N curve
for tunnel lining

Model set up
Determine internal pressure that yields
the amount of tunnel wall deformation at
the point of the support installation
Assessment of Boundary Material Failure
In-situ stress Condition Properties. Criteria/
e.g. E, v Material type

Add the lining properties with definition at


the stage when the wall deformation is
Use Q-system to get Geological
equal to the deformation prior support
strength Index and then to obtain
installation
parameter for Hoek & Brown failure
envolope

Determine whether the tunnel lining


A1.1 Determine the radius of plastic zone step 2.1 meets the FoS requirements
at end stage and the maximum wall lining
deformation structural
design

a1.2 Use Vlachopoulos and Diederichs


method to determine the tunnel deformation
before support installation according to the
span of the design tunnel

step 2.2 Design for Ground


Covergence- Support
Reaction

Plot the ground convergence curve by For a support with a know stiffness, Plot
using the maximum wall deformation in the support curve starting from the
multiple stage with different load reduction determined tunnel wall deformation at the
factor point of the support installation

Intersection between ground convergence


Check the serviceability requirement curve and the support curve gives the
portion of pressure taken by the support
and the total wall deformation required.

You might also like