IN THE COURT OF THE HON’BLE PRINCIPAL JUDGE AT FAMILY
COURT, NEW DELHI
MATRIMONIAL CASE NO. 86 OF 2020
IN THE MATTER OF:
Mr. Aditya Singh
S/O Mr. Ashish Singh
R/O 257, East of Kailash --------PETITIONER
VERSUS
MRS. Anam Mehra
D/O Rishikesh Mehra
R/O Sector 42, Dwarka ----------DEFENDANT
PETITION UNDER SECTION 9 OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT 1955 FOR
RESTITUTION OF CONJUGAL RIGHTS
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
The Petitioner, above named states as under:
1. That marriage of the Petitioner and the Respondent was solemnized on
3.09.2017 at Chancellor Club according to Hindu rites and ceremonies. The
marriage was registered with the Registrar of marriages at Delhi.
2. That the status and place of residence of the Parties to the marriage before the
marriage and at the time of filing this petition is given as under:
i) Place of residence before marriage
ii) Place of residence at the time of filing the Petition
3. That from this marriage, the couple has been blessed with one boy aged 4 years
and one girl child aged 2 years.
4. That the Petitioner and his wife were living together happily at our house. That
on 2.06.2022 the respondent went to her father’s house at sector 42, Dwarka. She
gave word to return within 15 days, but she did not abide by her word and has not
returned so far. The Respondent without any reasonable excuse, living in the
house of her father.
5. That the petitioner went to his fathers-in-law’s house at Sector 42, Dwarka to
bring the respondent, a number of times, but on one pretext or the other, she
declined to come along with the petitioner to his house.
6. That lastly the petitioner went to the house of the respondent’s father at Sector
42, Dwarka on 10.8.2022 and asked the respondent to return with him, but she
refused to come.
7. That the respondent deserted the petitioner or/and has withdrawn from his
company without any reasonable or lawful excuse. Hence the necessity for the
petition arose.
8. The Petition is not being presented in collusion with the Respondent.
9. The Petition is being presented without any unnecessary or improper delay on
the part of the Petitioner.
10. There is no other legal ground as to why the decree of restitution of conjugal
rights be not granted in favour of the Petitioner.
11. That no litigation has taken place between the parties to the Petition earlier.
12. This Hon'ble Court has jurisdiction to entertain and try this Petition as the
marriage was solemnized at Chancellor Club the parties last resided together at
257, East of Kailash and even presently the respondent is residing within the
Jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court.
13. That the cause of action accrued to the petitioner against the respondent,
within the jurisdiction of this Court, on 2.06.2022 when the respondent left for
her father’s house at Sector 42, Dwarka and it continues to accrue from day to
day till the respondent comes back to the home of the petitioner and resumes his
company.
14. In the facts and circumstances of case mentioned herein above this Hon'ble
Court may graciously be pleased to:
PRAYER:
That the Petitioner, therefore, prays:
a) for grant of decree for restitution of conjugal rights in favour of Petition and
against the respondent; and
b) Any other relief or reliefs which the court may deem proper under the
circumstances be also awarded to the petitioner.
PETITIONER
THROUGH
Sharma., Advocate
Place: C41, New Ashok Nagar
Date: 12.08.2022
VERIFICATION
I, the above-named petitioner, do hereby verify that the contents of this petition
in Para No. 1to Para No. 14are true to my personal knowledge and those in Para
No. 1 to Para No. 14 are believed by me to be true.
PETITIONER
