PJAEE, 17(6) (2020)

IMPACT OF EMPLOYEE WELFARE FACILITIES ON JOB SATISFACTION

WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO CHENNAI CITY

Ms. G.Anitha1, Dr.R.Sridharan2

1
Research Scholar, 2Associate professor,
Department of Commerce, College of Science and Humanities,
SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur

Ms. G.Anitha1, Dr.R.Sridharan2, Impact Of Employee Welfare Facilities On Job

Satisfaction With Special Reference To Chennai City– Palarch’s Journal of Archaeology
of Egypt/Egyptology 17(6) (2020). ISSN 1567-214X.

Keywords: employee welfare, job satisfaction, welfare facilities, organization.

Abstract
Employee Welfare is words includes variety of service, reimbursement along with services obtainable toward
the employees through the employer. During like liberal edging reimbursement the manager make time value
income used for worker. The essentialuse of member of staff benefit be toward enhance the living of workers
with stay them joyful as well as happy. Employee welfare procedures inspire the workers meant for the
improved presentation, moreover boost awake employee self-esteem with improve the human being
connection plus it increase the job satisfaction of the workers. Job satisfaction is a versatile conception. It is
important element of managerial atmosphere as well as it be significant part into the organization of worker
affiliation. Consequently the research objectiveis to study the impact of employee welfare measures on job
satisfaction.

Introduction
Of every factor of manufacture – investment, property, labor: Laboror else Man is
undoubtly the vital aspect to make a business. Employees are currently- a –time see as
company associates of the business. Employee welfare scheme is elastic along with above
change. These might be there introduce through the employer, management, human
resources, or else through some communion generous society. The reason of employee
benefit is near carry regarding the improvement of the entirebehavior of the personnel to
create a improved employees. Welfare facilities offer improved corporal with psychological
physical condition toward employees moreover consequently promotes well job
surroundings. Employees be not merely resources near the association except and elevate
the average of the association.

The board ofexpertresting on welfare facilities all for employees constitutethrough the
International Labor Organization (ILO) in 1963 has dividedthe welfare measures
withintoward intramural plus extramural scheme. The Intramural welfare facilities be
2666
 PJAEE, 17(6) (2020)

individuals provide in the basis of the organization such as hygienic amenities, crèches,
relax shelter with canteen, consumption irrigate, exhaustion, healthiness service as well as
professional protection, organizational planning, uniform and defensive garments, shift
payment, etcetera amenities similar to shelter, checkup remuneration plus edification
amenities help out toward raise efficiency of employees.
The extramural welfare facilities be provide exterior organization like parenthood
advantage, communal assurance actions, aerobics instructions and educational actions,
records or interpretation area, depart voyage amenities, employees cooperatives well as
customers supportive provisions, supportive recognition society, programmers intended for
the benefit of women, childhood along with kids plus transportation conveniences, etc.
Employee fulfillments involve attractive actions toward support workers to continue inside
the association meant for the majority quantity of occasion.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Satyanarayna and Reddi (2012) affirmed with the meaning of the general satisfaction level
of workers regarding benefit events in the association coat be acceptable. on the other hand,
a little be not pleased by benefit procedures provide in the association. Consequently it is
recommended to the obtainable benefit procedures might exist superior additional. Such as
benefit measure develop the worker regular of income and their fulfillment level.
Srinivas (2013) recognized benefit amenities and workers satisfaction level regarding
benefit amenities adoption Bosch limited, It be establish to the majority, benefit amenities
similar to remedial, cafeteria, operational surroundings, protection actions etc, be provide in
the companion ship plus the majority of the worker be fulfilled by the welfare facilities
adopt in the business towards employee welfare.
R Santana Krishnan (2015) In this study the employee welfare behavior of the majority
division impacted in sympathetic principles and performance in some nation. In India, by
presentation of welfare with one more performance the state of the employment was
desperate, abuse of childlabor, employment of extended hour, awful hygiene and
nonattendance of happiness events be the dependable rudiments of manufacturing ability
being into India. This critique places of interest the employee welfare measures and
programmer.

Objectives of study
To study regarding the impact of employee welfare amenities on job satisfaction in an
organizations at Chennai.
To recommend offer in civilizing the employee fulfillment
To scrutinize the job fulfillment level of employee concerning benefit procedures provide
by the organization.
To evaluate along with procedures the troubles face via the workers

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Sample method: The sampling technique second-hand in used forlearningbe non
probability convenient sampling. The primary cause used for using convenient sampling is
the non availability of employee outline intended for random sampling structure. Still
thinking a person is definite other than the sensible approach is hard toward recognize the
randomized employee. Sample size: 62 respondents

DATA ANALYSIS

Table 1.1 Age of respondents

2667
 PJAEE, 17(6) (2020)

Particular Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

18-30 years 23 37.1 37.1 37.1

31-40 years 20 32.3 32.3 69.4

Valid
above 41 years 19 30.6 30.6 100.0
Total 62 100.0 100.0

Table 1.1 shows that 37% majority of the respondents are 18-30 age group, 30.6% of
respondents are above 40 age group

Table1.2 Gender of respondents

particular Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent

male 38 61.3 61.3 61.3

Valid female 24 38.7 38.7 100.0

Total 62 100.0 100.0

Table 1.2 shows that 61.3% majority of the respondents of male and 38% of
female respondents

Table1.3 Monthly income of respondents

Particular Frequenc y Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent

upto Rs 30,000 23 37.1 37.1 37.1

Rs 31,000 - Rs 1,00,000
Valid 28 45.2 45.2 82.3

above Rs 1,00,000 11 17.7 17.7 100.0

Total 62 100.0 100.0
Table 1.3 shows that 45.2 majority of the respondents monthly income are Rs.31000-Rs
1,00,000, 17.7% of the respondents income are above Rs. 1,00,000

One way ANOVA test showing influence of overall welfare measures on employee
job satisfaction.

Table 1.4 Comparison between income and influence of welfare measures on

employee job satisfaction
ANOVA
Particular Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.

2668
 PJAEE, 17(6) (2020)

Between
26.525 3 8.842 99.540 .000
Groups
Within Groups 5.152 58 .089
Total 31.677 61

2669
 PJAEE, 17(6) (2020)

INFERENCE: The hugeness esteem is 0.000 which is under 0.05 in the way the model
measurably essentialness in anticipating comparison relationship between monthly income
and influence of overall welfare measures on employee for satisfaction. Since, F determined
is more note worthy than the (value=99.540). Here displays effective general miniature act
critical.
Descriptive Statistics
Particular N Minimu m Maximu m Mean Std.
Deviation
Influence of overall welfare measures on employee job
satisfaction
62 1 4 2.47 1.051

welfare measures helps

in solving the problems faced by employee 62 1 4 2.44 1.018

opinion about recreation facilities provided by the

company
62 1 5 2.37 1.394

sufficient relax gap are

62 1 5 2.53 1.251
set
provided sufficient tools and equipments
needs to do my work 62 1 5 2.27 1.176

satisfied with employee safety measures

provided by company 62 1 5 2.11 1.088

management builds and maintain work

relationship 62 1 5 2.03 1.228

Valid N (list wise) 62

Interpretation:
In this analysis statistics it is seen that the highest mean is 2.53, which indicates adequate rest
interval are given in company Which indicates, employees are satisfied with their welfare facilities
and also employer are provided there more welfare measures given to the employee.
The management builds and maintains work is lowest mean is (2.03) in this Descriptive Statistics

2670
 PJAEE, 17(6) (2020)

Table 1.5 Correlation statistics

Particular sufficient provided with satisfied with management
relax gap are sufficient tools employee builds and
set and equipments safety maintains
needed to do measures work
my work provided by relationship
company

Pearson
sufficient relax gap are Correlation 1 .936** .919** .907**
set
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 62 62 62 62
Pearson
provided with sufficient .936** 1 .949** .914**
Correlation
tools and equipments
needed to do my work Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 62 62 62 62
Pearson
satisfied with employee .919** .949** 1 .930**
Correlation
safety measures provided
by company Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 62 62 62 62
Pearson
management builds and .907** .914** .930** 1
Correlation
maintains work
relationship Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 62 62 62 63
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Chi-square analysis showing welfare measures helps in solving the problems faced by
employee

Table 1.6 Comparison between age and welfare helps in solving the problems
faced by employee
Chi-Square Tests
Particular Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 66.982a 6 .000

Likelihood Ratio 83.245 6 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 46.257 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 62
a. 8 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.68.

2671
 PJAEE, 17(6) (2020)

INFERENCE:
The chi square on 5% equivalent regarding significance p- value is less than 0.05. So null hypothesis
is accepted. Therefore is important among age of respondents for concern into welfare measures helps
in solving the problems faced by employee.

FINDINGS:
32.3% of the employees are 31-40 years age group 37.1% of employees income level up to Rs 30000
61.3% of male employee and 38.7% of female employee
22.6% are Influence of overall welfare measures on employee job satisfaction is little extent, 27.4% is
some extent, 30.6% is considerable extent, 19.4% is great extent.
19.4% is always, 37.1% is sometimes, 24.2% is never of Welfare measures helps in solving the
problems faced by employee
The highest mean is 2.53, which indicates sufficient relax time are set within business

CONCLUSION:
In this study found that Employee welfare facility has huge impact on job satisfaction. The welfare
measures must exist through into such a method to it accomplish the wants of the workers but the
requirements of the employees be fulfilled it resolve guide to the fulfillment of the employees which
resolve mechanically lead to amplify during efficiency of the business. It give the believe of heed to
the employees that consequence in honesty and reliability of the employees towards the business.
The finding of the study is important to impact of employee welfare and improve job satisfaction of
the employee in the organization. Therefore organization can help in solve the problems faced by
employee and also they provided welfare facilities to employee of the company.

REFERENCES
1. Aswathappa K. (2002), „Human Resource and Personnel Management‟, Tata McGraw Hill, pp 325
2. Ghana Library. (2007). Staff Development and Employee Welfare Practices and Their Effect on
Productivity. Vol. 19 (1) , pp. 83-90
3. Sabarirajan, A., Meharajan, T., & Arun, B. (2010). A study on the various welfare measures and their
impact on QWL provided by the Textile Mills
4. Resma, S., & Basavraju, M. J. (2013). Employee welfare measure in mining Industry-A study with
reference to statutory welfare measures.
5. Upadhyay, D., & Gupta, A. (2012). Morale, welfare measures, job satisfaction: The key mantras for
gaining competitive edge.
6. Logasakthi, K., & Rajagopal, K. (2013). A Study On Employee Health, Safety And Welfare Measures
Of Chemical Industry
7. Sindhu, S. (2012). Role of Organization in welfare measures for employees.
8. Mohan, R., & Panwar, J. S. (2013). Current trends in employee welfare schemes in Udaipur Retial
Sector.
9. Michael R.White. (2005). Cooperative Unionism and Employee Welfare. Industrial Relations Journal,
Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 348-366.
10. Tripathi, P.C. “Labour Welfare and Social Security”, Personnel Management and Industrial
Relations”, Sultan Chand & Sons, New Delhi, 1998 pp 325-363.

2672