0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views6 pages

Nature vs. Nurture in Socialization

The document discusses the concepts of nature vs nurture and how they influence socialization and identity development. It explores how both genetic and environmental factors shape behaviors and traits, but argues that nurture has a greater impact through lifelong socialization and experiences. Understanding the interplay between both is important for improving social interactions and functioning within society.

Uploaded by

b64qnbgbzg
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views6 pages

Nature vs. Nurture in Socialization

The document discusses the concepts of nature vs nurture and how they influence socialization and identity development. It explores how both genetic and environmental factors shape behaviors and traits, but argues that nurture has a greater impact through lifelong socialization and experiences. Understanding the interplay between both is important for improving social interactions and functioning within society.

Uploaded by

b64qnbgbzg
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

SOC201: Introduction to Sociology

THE SOCIOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK

Introduction

A contrast is made between the two notions of genetic and environmental factors in

science, culture, and neuroscience when it comes to whether or not the development of modern

civilisation, conduct, and character is predominantly influenced by nature or by nurture. It is

possible that underlying differences will have an impact on the socialization and institution of a

society. This will necessitate a better understanding and awareness of genetic and environmental

factors in order to identify habits or qualities of others, as well as approaches to improve

interactions with them.

Socialization

Socialization is a lifelong process in which people learn about the ideals and traditions of

a group, which may take on a variety of shapes and forms. Socializing is a part of indoctrination,

which is a more complex, diverse, and effective series of interaction events that take place over a

longer period of time. Both individuals and societies need socializing. In the end, social

interaction helps us to gradually develop the ability to perceive oneself and through perspective

of everyone else, and via social involvement, we learn more at ourselves and our place in the

community (Author Unknown, 2008). Furthermore, we must understand the fundamentals of

content and quasi culture in order to operate efficiently in society. This includes everything from

how we dress to the suitable attraction for a particular time, from just how good and then when

we take naps to beds as well as what tends to make meal appropriate for cooking on an open

flame.
As defined by Slaughter (2006), good socializing overcomes the many hurdles that may

arise throughout the process of transitioning to a new professional setting. Effective important

socialization requires the elimination of a number of potential negatives in order to adjust to a

new workplace environment (Slaughter 2006). The Slaughter investigation report Stress,

surprise, worries, astonishment, and discomfort just are a lot of small negative aspects of

networking that are frequently mentioned.

Nurture and Nature

There is a great deal of dispute on whether a person's intrinsic characteristics or one-of-a-

kind experiences are more important than other factors in shaping physical and behavioral

features. Nature encompasses a wide range of factors, including prenatal, parental, family, peer

influences, culture, advertising, and economic situation, among others. In the dispute between

genetic and environmental factors, the term "nature" refers to natural characteristics or

characteristics that are not learned. In historical settings, the term "nature" may refer either to

human behaviour or the soul of a person. In today's scientific parlance, a human may relate to the

important genes and biological characteristics of a person.

Certain philosophers, such as Plato and Descartes, think that some features are innate or

arise naturally in the lack of other causes, whilst others disagree. Naturalists believe that

environmental variables are responsible for a great deal, if not even all, of a human's properties

and behavior. Many renowned philosophers, such as John Locke, believed that a tabula rasa, or a

clean slate, could be created. It is our life experiences that shape what we are or who we

understand in this respect. Personal and community identities are formed historically and
socially via the negotiation of one's own identity with that of other socioeconomic team members

and outsiders (Mills, 2011).

What is Better Nurture and Nature?

It was during my research that I found that while both genetics and environment had an

impact on the lives of people. Our conduct is influenced by hereditary and biological variables.

Our lives are shaped by our memorable ways, connections, and interpersonal interactions, among

other things. Nurture, on the other hand, has a more significant impact on our lives and our

characteristics than nature. Throughout their lives, people are subjected to a multitude of forms

of socialization. The fundamental traits of each individual, both biological causes and their

immediate environment, may have an effects on the growth of traits, viewpoints, and actions in

them.

Nurturing and sociability, on either side, are critical components of a human's

development and growth, and they may have an impact on their beliefs, actions, and views. The

existence of discrepancies can have an influence on humanity, institutions, and personal

interpersonal interactions. Therefore, better sense, comprehension, and cultivating of the

surroundings are required in order to identify the characteristics, behavior, and methodologies

that can be bolstered in order to make interconnections with others effective. Individuals will

become more relevant and more powerful as they gain more work and role experience

(Antonacopoulou and Wolfgang, 2010).

The notion in tabula rasa, often known as "Blank Slate," held by John Locke is the most

strong evidence in support of my argument. According to this concept, all of ourselves and
others our information is acquired from our previous experiences. He believes that we are

created with a clean canvas in our minds, and that we learn via our experiences as we get older.
References

Author Unknown (2008). Sociology Internet Library. Available at

http://www.businessbookmall.com/Sociology%20Internet%20Library.htm

Antonacopoulou, E. P., & Wolfgang, H. G. (2010). Staff induction practices and organizational

socialization: A review and extension of the debate. Society and Business Review, 5(1),

22 – 47. Retrieved from Proquest.

Mills, S. (2011). The difficulty with the diversity: White and Aboriginal women workers

representations of diversity management in Forest Processing Mills. Labour, 67, 45-77.

Retrieved from Proquest.

Slaughter, J. E. & Zickar, M. J. (2006). A new look at the role of insiders in the newcomer

socialization process. Group & Organization Management, 31 (2), 264-290. Retrieved

from Proquest.

You might also like