Rights of Marginalized Groups
Rights of Marginalized Groups
Unit III: Rights of Marginalized and other Disadvantaged People: Rights of Women –
Rights of Children – Rights of Differently Abled – Rights of Elderly - Rights of Scheduled
Castes – Rights of Scheduled Tribes – Rights of Minorities – – Rights of Prisoners – Rights
of Persons Living with HIVAIDS – Rights of LGBT.
x -x
RIGHTS OF MARGINALIZED AND OTHER DISADVANTAGED PEOPLE
Introduction
Human Rights are the basic right which is being provided by every constitution of every State
and every individual in this globe born with the inherent right of Human Right. They are
most basic right which an individual can ask to have from its nation. They have never given
away any kind of unfairness towards any individual or group of people or they haven‘t been
any discrimination made on the basis of caste, sex, religion etc. with any individual under any
nation. . They only sponsor the welfare and well-being of all persons with equal behaviour.
However, the socio-economic, political and cultural diversities, prevailing in each state across
the world, and politics of the nation states, take away the free effect of human rights to a
certain number of people.
The major problem faced by every developing nation is that the large number of human
sector falls under the poverty line. They are deprived of adequate access in the basic needs of
life such as health, education, housing, food, security, employment, justice and equity which
also include issues related to sustainable livelihood, social and political participation of the
vulnerable groups exists as the major problem in the developing nations.
All social groups should have equal access to the services provided by the State and equal
opportunity should be provided for their upward economic and social mobility. The
government of every nation should also ensure that should not be any sort of discrimination
against any section of our society. In India, certain social groups such as the SCs, STs, OBCs
and Minorities have in the past been deprived and vulnerable for human rights. There are
certain other groups which may be discriminated against and which suffer from handicaps
and the groups include persons with disabilities, older persons, street children, beggars and
victims of substance abuse. Our Constitution contains various provisions for the enlargement
of such marginalized groups, for instance, Article 341 for SCs, Article 342 for STs, Article
340 for OBCs, Article 30 which provides the right to minorities to establish and administer
educational institutions, and various other statutes. Their individual and collective growth,
however, cannot be ensured without improving their surroundings and providing clean
drinking water, toilets and educational opportunities.
The Constitution of India guaranteed to all the people of India the civil, political, economic,
social, and cultural rights for their realization by all sections of the polity without any kind of
discrimination. However, due to poverty, customary and cultural practices prevailing in the
country, there have not much opportunity offered to various groups and which lead to
deprive them of beig treated equally as the other sections of the society. There are various
disadvantaged groups of people such as women, children, Scheduled Castes, Scheduled
Tribes, Linguistic Minorities, Religious Minorities, Sexual Minorities etc. In order to expand
their rights, the Constitution of India has provided a number of concessions to protect them
from exploitation by other groups.
B) Special Laws
(i) The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005: This act enacted to
protect women from all forms of domestic violence. It provides protection to the wife or
female live-in partner from domestic violence from the husband or male live-in partner or his
relatives. This act includes to violence of any kind like physical, sexual, verbal, emotional.
(ii) Dowry Prohibition Act (1961): This act prohibits the giving or receiving of dowry at or
before or any time after the marriage from women.
(iii) The family courts Act (1954): The family courts act provides for the establishment of
family courts for speedy settlement of family disputes. This act concludes relating to family
matters like matrimonial reliefs, custody of children, maintenance for wife and children.
(iv) The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace act (2013): This act seeks to protect
women from sexual harassment at their place of work and contribute to realization of their
rights to gender equality, life and liberty and equality in working conditions everywhere.
(v) The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act (1971): Intention of this act is reducing the
incidence of illegal abortion and maternal mortality and morbidity. This act provides for the
termination of certain pregnancies by registered medical practitioners on humanitarian and
medical grounds.
(vi) The Equal Remuneration Act (1976): This act provides for the payment of equal
remuneration to both men and women workers for the same work. It prevents discrimination
on the ground of sex. So, working women have the rights to draw an equal salary as
compared to men.
(vii) Maternity Benefit Act (1961): This act regulates the employment of women in certain
establishments for certain periods before and after child-birth and provides for maternity
benefit. (viii) Legal Services Authorities Act (1987): It provides for free legal services to
Indian women. (ix) Hindu Marriage Act (1955): This act introduced monogamy and allowed
divorce on certain specified grounds. It provided equal rights to Indian man and woman in
respect of marriage and divorce.
(x) Hindu Succession Act (1956): This act recognizes the right of women to inherit parental
property equally with men. The other various laws which also contain certain rights and
safeguards for women which includes Minimum Wages Act (1948), Employees State
Insurance Act (1948), Employees‘ State Insurance Act (1948), Immoral Traffic (Prevention)
Act (1956), Plantation Labour Act (1951), Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act (1976),
Muslim women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act (1986), Special Marriage Act (1954),
Foreign Marriage Act (1969, Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act (1956).
RIGHTS OF CHILDREN
Census 2011 counted more than 440 million children in India below 18 years of age
constituting 37% of the total population of the country. Within the age group of 0-17 years,
children between 0-6 years constituted about 14% of the total population of children in India
followed by 17% between 7-14 years and the remaining 6% in the age group of 15-17 years.
With an Infant Mortality Rate of 41 children dying before attaining one year of age per 1000
live births, the United Nation Population Division has ranked India as the 144th country out
of a total of 188 listed countries as far as IMR is concerned. The World Bank report records
53 children dying before the age of five per 1000 live births for India. These are a few of the
glimpses of the status of the children in India that needs close scrutiny. With poverty on one
side and vulnerability on the other, the children needed an umbrella of protective cover from
the world around them. In this context, issues revolving around the different facets of rights
of the children gained momentum. As a result of such endeavor, The UN General Assembly
adopted the Convention and opened it for signature on 20th November 1989 (the 30th
anniversary of its Declaration of the Rights of the Child).
It came into force on 2nd September 1990 after the required number of nations ratified it.
Currently, 194 countries are party to it, including every member of the United Nations. The
strategy adopted by the world was to combat poverty on one hand and on the other, usher
strict implementation of the different facets of child rights including right to survive, right to
protection, right to development and right to participation. It is almost two-and-a-half decades
since the onset of UNCRC (1990) and hence it is time to prospectively assess the situation of
the children and child rights in India.
The child rights in the Indian constitution as described in the Convention have been
summarised into the following fundamentals with references to various articles.
Constitutional Provisions Regarding Rights of Children The Constitution of India guarantees
certain rights to the children of India which are mentioned in its Part III (Fundamental
Rights) and Part IV (Directive Principles of State Policy). These are elaborated below,
Part III:
Article 14: Voters of India, as well as children, should be treated equally before law and
should be equal protection by the law with no discrimination.
Article 15(3): Discrimination is prohibited by the constitution. However, it shall not hold a
ground to forestall the state from creating special provisions for children for his or her
advantage.
Article 21: Nobody shall be bereft of his life or personal liberty unless by a due process of
law. An individual should have proper and adequate food, shelter, clothing, etc. Such life
shall not mean mere animal existence.
Article 21A: The State shall offer free and required education to any or all the children
falling within the age group of six to 14 years in such manner which the State could, by law,
determine. Article 23: Prohibits trafficking in citizenry and beggar or the other sort of forced
labour. Article 24: Prohibits employment of youngsters beneath the age of fourteen years in
an exceedingly mill, mine or in the other dangerous employment.
Part IV:
Article 39 (e): The state shall thrive to make sure that the tender age of youngsters isn't
abused, and that people aren't forced by financial necessity to enter into activities which are
unsuited to their age or strength.
Article 39 (f): The state shall guarantee children opportunities and facilities to develop in an
exceedingly healthy manner and in conditions of freedom and dignity. It should even be
ensured that childhood and youth of the child is protected against exploitation and against
unethical and material abandonment.
Article 41: The state is obligated to, among its economic capability and development, secure
provisions for academic opportunities and facilities.
Article 44: The state shall create all potential efforts to secure an identical Civil Code for all
the citizens, thereby implying an identical code for the adoption of youngsters.
Article 45: The state shall endeavor to produce free and required education to kids till they
attain they age of fourteen years. Article 46: It's the duty of the state to push the economic
interests of weaker sections of the society with special care and thus, the children in that.
Article 47: The state is obligated to boost the extent of nutrition and also the normal of
living and to enhance public health, as well as that of youngsters.
Article 51(c): International laws and treaties shall be revered by the state to each potential
extent, as well as the CRC and its optional protocols.
Article 51(k): It shall be the duty of each national of India who may be a parent or guardian
to produce opportunities for education to his kid or, because the case could also be, ward
between the age of six and fourteen years.
Article 243G: It provides for the institutionalization of child care by seeking to entrust
programs of Woman and Child Development to Panchayat (Item twenty-five of Schedule 11).
3 Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act (Amended in 1986), 1956 This Act particularly deals
with person or persons who procure or attempt to procure any child for the purpose of
prostitution or person who is found with a child in a brothel (then it will be presumed that
child has been detained for this purpose) and provides punishment for them. It also lays
provisions for the care of rescued children.
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 This Act is aimed at punishing the
offenders guilty of sexual offences against children (below the age of 18 years of age). It also
prescribes procedures for trial, such as, the name of victim shall not be disclosed since he is a
child, proceedings of the case will be conducted in the court with cameras recording the trial,
and that the accused is not to be kept in-front of the child victim while the examination or
cross-examination is being conducted.
The Act defines different forms of sexual abuse, such as penetrative and non-penetrative
assault, including sexual harassment and pornography, and also deems a sexual assault to be
―aggravated‖ under certain circumstances, such as when the child abused is mentally ill or
when the abuse is committed by a person in a position of trust or authority vis-a-vis the child,
like a family member, police officer, teacher, or doctor. People who traffic in children for
sexual purposes are also punishable under the provision relating to abetment in the said Act.
The Act prescribes stringent punishment graded as per the gravity of the offence, with a
maximum term of rigorous imprisonment for life, and fine. In keeping with the best
international child protection standards, the said Act also provides for mandatory reporting of
sexual offences. This casts a legal duty upon a person who has knowledge that a child has
been sexually abused to report the offence, if he fails to do so, he may be punished with six
months‘ imprisonment and/or a fine.
The Act also casts upon the police, the role of acting as a child protector during the
investigative process. Thus, the police personnel receiving a report of sexual abuse of a child
are given the responsibility of making urgent arrangements for the care and protection of the
child, such as obtaining emergency medical treatment for the child and placing the child in a
shelter home, should the need arise. The police are also required to bring the matter to the
attention of the Child Welfare Committee (CWC) within 24 hours of receiving the report, so
the CWC may then proceed where required to make further arrangements for the safety and
security of the child. The said Act makes provisions for the medical examination of the child
in a manner designed to cause as little distress as possible. The examination is to be carried
out in the presence of the parent or other person whom the child trusts, and in the case of
female child, by a female doctor.
The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 The Right of
Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 defines ‗child‘ as a male of female
child of the age of six to fourteen years.6 Elementary education means the education from
first class to eight classes7 ‗Capitation fee‘ means any kind of donation or contribution or
payment other than the fee notified by the school.8 According to this law, a child belonging
to disadvantaged group means a child belonging to the Scheduled Caste, the Scheduled Tribe,
the socially and educationally backward class or such other group having disadvantage owing
to social, cultural, economic, geographical, linguistic, gender or such other factor, as may be
specified by the appropriate Government, by notification9 and child belonging to weaker
section means a child belonging to such parent or guardian whose annual income is lower
than the minimum limit specified by the appropriate Government, by notification. The Act
guarantees that no child shall be denied admission in a School for lack of age proof.11 For
the purposes of admission to elementary education, the age of a child shall be determined on
the basis of the birth certificate issued in accordance with the provisions of the Births, Deaths
and Marriages Registration Act, 1886 or on the basis of such other document, as may be
prescribed.12The Right to Free and Compulsory Education Act prohibits a School from
holding back a child in any class or expelling a child from School till the completion of
elementary education. The Act also prohibits the School from giving any type of physical
punishment or mental harassment to any child14 and whoever contravenes this provision
shall be liable to disciplinary Action under the service rules applicable to such person.
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 The Juvenile Justice
(Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 has come into force from 15th January, 2016 and
repeals the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. It follows certain
principles such as the Principle of presumption of innocence, Principle of dignity and worth,
Principle of participation, Principle of best interest, Principle of family responsibility,
Principle of safety, Positive measures, Principle of non-stigmatizing semantics, Principle of
non-waiver of rights, Principle of equality and non-discrimination, Principle of right to
privacy and confidentiality, Principle of institutionalization as a measure of last resort,
Principle of repatriation and restoration and other principles like the Principle of fresh start,
that is all past records of any child under the Juvenile Justice system should be erased except
in special circumstances.
The Commissions for the Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005 In view of the National and
International development and concern towards child rights violation the need for a National
Commission for Protection of Child Rights has been articulated by many social scientists and
non-governmental organizations. The Government accordingly decided to set up the National
Commission for Protection of Child Rights and for better protection of their rights by
providing speedy trial of offences against children or for violation of child rights. The States
have also been authorized to set up State Level Commission for Protection of Child Rights in
their respective states. India has also participated in the United Nations General Assembly
Summit in 1990 which adopted a Declaration on Survival, Protection and Development of
children.
The National Commission of the Protection of Child Rights consists of, one Chairperson and
six members. The Chairperson shall be a person of eminence who has done outstanding work
for promoting the welfare of the children.15Out of six members, at least two should be
women. The other members should be persons of eminence, ability, integrity, standing and
experience in the field of education, child health care, and welfare and child development,
juvenile justice care of neglected or marginalized children or children with disabilities,
elimination of child labour or children in distress, child psychology or sociology or Laws
relating to children.
The Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 It restraints child marriage until the minimum
age, i.e. 21 for male and 18 for female, has been attained by them. It applies to the people of
all the religions. The basic objective of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 is to
provide for the prohibition of solemnization of child marriages and for matters connected
therewith or incidental thereto.
Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 This act regulates the working
conditions for children in employment and prohibits working of children in certain kinds of
employments.
The Act prohibits the employment of children in certain occupations and processes set forth
in Part A58 and Part B59 of the Schedule. The Court also must strive to interpret the statute
as to protect and achieve the objective and purpose of the enactment. Any narrow or technical
interpretation of the provisions would defeat the legislative policy. The Court must, therefore,
keep the legislative policy in mind in applying the provisions of the Act to the facts of the
case. The Act also provides that the Central Government may, by notification in the Official
Gazette, constitute an Advisory Committee to be called the Child Labour Technical Advisory
to advise the Central Government for the purpose of addition of occupations and processes to
the Schedule.17 The Committee shall consist of a Chairman and such other members not
exceeding ten, as may be appointed by the Central Government. The Act penalizes the person
who employs any child or permits any child to work in contravention of the provisions of
section 3, with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than three months, but which
may extend to one year or with fine which shall not be less than ten thousand rupees, but
which may extend to twenty thousand rupees or with both. Upon repeating the act of
employing the child in contravention of provisions of section 3, the employer shall be
punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months, but which
may extend to two years.
The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 In order to save the pregnant women‘s
health, strength and sometimes, life, the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act was passed
in 1971. It legalized abortions under certain conditions. So, it is obvious that the Medical
Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 is made in favour of mother and as well as in favour of
unborn child. It put forth the principal that death is better than sufferings, as the Act allows
killing of child in mother‘s womb, where there is substantial risk that the child, if born, would
suffer from deformities and diseases. The provisions of this Act are however, sometimes
misused. The right to abortion is essential for a woman to have control over her reproductive
process. But in Indian society, the reason behind a large number of abortions is neither the
health of the woman, nor reproductive right but the sex of the unborn child. Abortions are
generally performed to get rid of the child who is female (sex-determination test), which is
illegal and criminal both on the part of parenting as well as doctor who performs such
abortion.
In spite of, both legislative and constitutional provisions for the protection, as well as
prevention from the sexual abuse of children, there is no stoppage of such type of incidents of
exploitation and abuse. On the other hand, number of such cases is alarmingly increasing day
by day. As a result, judicial intervention has been felt necessary, but such intervention is not
sufficient enough to meet the necessities of time to control the exploitation of children. It has
been also observed from various judgments of decided cases that in many cases at the time of
pronouncing punishment for committing offence against the children, mainly in case of
sexual offence, judiciary often give the lesser punishment in comparison with the gravity of
offences committed by the offender.
Meaning of Disability:
Disability is an impairment that may be cognitive, development, intellectual, activity,
limitations, sensory or some combination of these. It substantially affects a person‘s life
activities and may be present from birth or occur during a person‘s lifetime. Disability is a
contested concept, with different meanings of different communities. It may be used to refer
to physical or mental attributes that some institutions, particularly medicine, view as needing
to be fixed. It may refer to limitations imposed on people by the constraints of an ablest
society. People with disabilities have the same health needs as non disabled people for
immunizations, cancer screening etc. They may also experience a narrow margin of health
both because of poverty and social exclusion and also because they may be vulnerable to
secondary conditions such as pressure sores or urinary tract infections.
The disabled person shall enjoy all rights contained in this declaration without distinction or
discrimination. The disabled persons have inherent rights to respect for their human dignity
and irrespective of the origin, nature and seriousness of their handicaps and disabilities, have
same Fundamental Rights. Disabled persons have the same civil and political rights as other
human beings. Disabled persons are entitled to the measures designed to enable them to
become as self-reliant as possible. Disabled persons have the right to economic and social
security, including the right, according to their capabilities, to secure and retain employment
or to engage in a useful, productive and remunerative occupation and to join trade unions.
Disabled persons have the right to live with their families or with foster parents and to
participate in all social, creative or recreational activities. Disabled persons shall be protected
against all exploitation and treatment of a discriminatory, abusive or degrading nature.
In the charter of the United Nations it is proclaimed that the inherent dignity and worth and
the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of
freedom, justice and peace in the world. It is supposed that the convention would make a
significant contribution to redressing the profound social disadvantage of persons with
disabilities and promote their participation in the civil, political, economic, and social and
cultural spheres with equal opportunities, in both developing and developed countries. The
convention on the Rights of Persons with disabilities deals with matters such as, general
principles on the basis of which the rights of the disabled persons are to be promoted and
protected, the obligations that have been undertaken by the State parties to adopt measures.
The protocol has been added to the present convention authorizing the Committee on the
Peron with Disabilities to receive and consider communications from or on behalf of
individuals or groups of individuals, who claim to be victims of a violation by a State party of
the provisions of the present convention.
3. Right to Work:
Article 27 of the CRDP instructs states to ―recognizes the right of persons with disabilities to
work, on an equal basis with others; this includes the rights to opportunity to gain a living by
work freely chosen or accepted in a labour market and work environment that is open,
inclusive and accessible to persons with disabilities.
Right to Liberty:
Article 14 of the CRPD instructs state parties to guarantee people with disabilities the right to
liberty and security of person. We considered the right to liberty to be guaranteed to persons
with disabilities if they were explicitly granted the right to freedom or liberty. Globally, only
9% of the constitution explicitly guarantees the right to liberty to persons with disabilities.
However 19% of the constitution specifies that the right to liberty can be denied to persons
with the mental health condition.
Employment: In government jobs, 3% of the seats are reserved for persons with disabilities.
Income Tax Concession: Under sections 80DD and 80U of Income Tax Act, 1961, persons
with disabilities are also entitled to certain income tax concessions.
Policies in India:
National policy for persons with disabilities, 2006. The Government of India formulated the
national Policy for persons with disabilities in Feb 2006 which deals with the physical,
educational and economic rehabilitation of persons with disabilities.
The National Policy recognise the Persons with Disabilities are valuable human resources for
the country and seeks to create an environment that provides them equal opportunities,
protection of their rights and full participation in society . Some of the aspects which the
policy focuses on are:
1) Prevention of Disabilities 2) Rehabilitation Measures 3) Women with disabilities 4)
Children with disabilities
RIGHTS OF ELDERLY
In Indian societies the family structure is more complex and the human relations are to be
valued, its starts right from the socialization processes in human life. Recently those concepts
are drastically changing due to the life style adopted by the people losing every kind of
values, confining with selfish nature by suppressing the humanitarian views. These
developments are affecting directly or indirectly towards in numerous social problems.
Violence against elderly people is no exceptions. Such developments are presently breaking
the family structure and humanity. Elderly crimes are most serious issues in Indian
conditions. At presently there are 95 million population in India is above 60 years of age
according to Help Age India Report predicted changing values in family system, economic
compulsion of the children, Neglect and abuse are kind a serious problem in India makes
flowing elder population towards Old Age Homes. The elders are most vulnerable to the
crimes and easily become victims. Weak conditions may enhance the precipitation chances.
Legal Provisions
In the Indian Criminal Justice system, the local special laws are having important role.
Especially the canonical laws relating to the religious are not uniform in nature, applicable
conditions varies from religion to religion in India.
The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizen Act, India– 2007.
The act is enacted with the objectives of upholding the welfare of the elders. It is strictly
initiated that the children shall maintain their elders, Grand Parents and other relative elders
shall come under the maintenance. And also the act ensures protection to their lives and
property. Further this act also suggests the creations of Old age homes for those elders in
needy. State governments should establish Old age homes with the inmate‗s number 150 in
every district level. This act also emphasizes to establish the tribunal in every district in order
to facilitate every elder to claim their rights of the maintenances from their children. The
monthly expenditure of rupees 10,000/- shall claimed by the elders from their children, if
they do not pay, they may experience liable for punishment of 3 months of imprisonment or
5000 rupees fine or both.
Legal Services
The legal services are available through the Government of India. The Free legal services are
mandatory in the entire district across the country through the Legal service Authority. Elder
citizen also can be benefitted under this; some Lawyer‗s associations are providing free
service to the elders voluntarily. Also NGO‗s helps in this regard, those who are needy can
approach the concerned authorities.
Other Government Policies and the Schemes: Government motto is to protect the elders in
promoting their health, Wellbeing and to make capable independently. Some of the available
policies are,
A) National Policy for Older Persons: The Union Government of India enacted the National
policy for older persons in 1999 to promote the Health, Safety, Social Security and Care. This
policy considers the age of 60 and above is elders. The prime intention behind is to encourage
the families to take care of their parents and grandparents, to support, also this policy
provides the facilities to the Voluntary and NGO‗s to ensure the dignity of the elders who are
so vulnerable in the society. This policy also ensures the financial security, Heath care,
Nutrition, Shelters, education, welfare, Protection of life and Property.
B) National Council for older persons: National council NCOP has been established by the
ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment with basic objectives like, advising the
government to enact the suitable policy, provides the feedback and implementations,
initiatives and special programs, redressing and grievance cells, concessions, rebates,
discounts at government and corporate sectors, establish old age homes.
C) Integrated Program for Older Persons: Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment
provides the scheme of financial assistance about 90% of the project cost to NGO‗s, this is
going to be used for old age homes, Centers, mobile Medicare units. These facilities are also
extended to the Government Panchayathi raj, institutions, Local Bodies. These institutions
shall serve by establish of Day Care centers, Alzheimer awareness, Dementia, Physiotherapy
clinics, Helplines, Counseling centers, Sensitizing programs, awareness, Formation of senior
citizen associations.
As society progresses, the living conditions and lifestyle are fluctuating due to various
reasons. Stress full life leading people towards more complexes in living standards. These
progressive changes are not towards humanitarian values, but towards the negligence in
relations. Socialization helps human beings to get more advances in the morality. Somehow
the values are declining 21st century globally considered as century of elders. It is shameful
to abuse elders are showing negligence. However laws are there to protect, still the
socialization starts through the families hence the responsibility on every people educate the
future generation to be good human beings.
SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS Equality before Law: The State shall not deny to any person
equality before law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. Article
15: Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth—
(1) The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race,
caste, sex, place of birth or any of them,
(2) No citizen shall, on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of
them, be subject to any disability, liability, restriction or condition with regard to— (a)
Access to shops, public restaurants, hotels and places of public entertainment; or
(b) The use of wells, tanks, bathing ghats, roads and places of public resort maintained
wholly or partly out of State funds or dedicated to the use of general public.
(3) Nothing in this Article shall prevent the State from making any special provision for
women and children.
(4) Nothing in this Article or in clause (2) of Article 29 shall prevent the State from making
any special provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes
of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes].
Article 16: Equality of opportunity in matters of public employment—
(1) There shall be equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters relating to employment
or appointment to any office under the State.
(2) No citizen shall, on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, descent, place of birth,
residence or any of them, be ineligible for, or discriminated against in respect of, any
employment or office under the State.
(3) Nothing in this Article shall prevent Parliament from making any law prescribing, in
regard to class or classes of employment or appointment to an office [under the Government
of, or any local or other authority within, a State or Union territory, any requirement as to
residence within that State or Union territory] prior to such employment or appointment.
(4) Nothing in this Article shall prevent the State from making any provision for the
reservation of appointments or posts in favor of any backward class of citizens which, in the
opinion of the State, is not adequately represented in the services under the State 4(A)
Nothing in this Article shall prevent the State from making any provision for reservation in
matters of promotion to any class or classes of posts in the services under the State in favor of
the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes which in the opinion of the States, are not
adequately represented in the services under the State.
(2) Nothing in this Article shall affect the operation of any law which provides that the
incumbent of an office in connection with the affairs of any religious or denominational
institution or any member of the governing body thereof shall be a person professing a
particular religion or belonging to a particular denomination.
Article 17: Abolition of Untouchability — Untouchability is abolished and its practice in
any form is forbidden. The enforcement of any disability arising out of untouchability shall
be an offence punishable in accordance with law
23(1)Traffic in human beings and beggary and other similar forms of forced labor are
prohibited and any contravention of this provision shall be an offence punishable in
accordance with law.
25(2) (b) Providing for social welfare and reform or the throwing open of Hindu religious
institutions of a public character to all classes and sections of Hindus.
Untouchability and Atrocities There was no uniform Central Act for this purpose for the
country as a whole. In pursuance of Article 17 of the Constitution, the Untouchability
(Offences) Act, was passed by the Parliament in 1955 which came into force with effect from
1st June, 1955 repealing all the State enactments. The Central Act prescribed punishment for
the practice of 'Untouchability', for the enforcement of any disability arising there from and
the matters connected therewith. Ever since it came into force, it was felt that the Act was not
serving its purpose and the punishment provided in it was few and inadequate. Therefore, the
Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955 was enacted in 1976 to re-name and amend the
Untouchability (Offences) Act, 1955 with comprehensive amendments by making the
punishments under this Act more stringent and offences non-compoundable. The machinery
for the enforcement of this Act has been suitably strengthened by the setting up of special
cells, special courts, mobile squads, provision of legal aid etc. The law to punish the
untouchability offences as proclaimed under Article 17 of the Constitution took more than
five years to arrive showing disregard to the urgency attached to it by the founding fathers of
the Constitution. Even the amendments of the Act after a period of 17 years, are not
exhaustive. It is not possible to exhaustively catalogue all instances, of behavior which come
within the ambit of ‗untouchability‘. One of the innovations of the Act is that every year the
Central Government is required to place on the table of each house of the Parliament, a report
on the measures taken by itself and by the State Governments in pursuance of the mandate
contained in section 15(A)2 and (3) The enforcement of PCR Act in terms of cases registered,
disposed of at different stages and levels from the police to the courts and convictions, is not
adequate. Very few States have taken seriously the establishment of special courts as per
clause (iii) of Section 15(A)(2), preferably mobile special courts. The Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 which was brought into from
30.1.1990, is not very effective in spite of implementation machinery and special courts etc.
This Act requires serious implementation including establishment of exclusive special courts
with exclusive special judicial and investigative and prosecuting officers, all carefully
selected for proven sensitivity to social justice and liberation from caste based.
Bonded Labour Article 23, prohibits traffic in human beings and beggar and other similar
forms of forced labour. In pursuance of this provision the Bonded Labour System (Abolition)
Act, 1976 was enacted after a lapse of 26 years in 1976, with a view to abolishing this evil
practice and making the offences under this Act punishable. Majority of the bonded labour
belong to scheduled caste and scheduled tribe communities. Under Centrally Sponsored
Programme launched in 1978-79 grants aid is provided to the State Governments/U.T.
Administration on matching basis, for identification, liberation and rehabilitation of the
bonded laborers. The scheme envisages provision of rehabilitation grant up to ceiling limit of
Rs. 10,000 per freed bonded laborer, half of which is given as Central share. The State
Governments have been advised to suitably dovetail, the Centrally Sponsored Scheme with
other anti-poverty and employment generation programmes so as to pool the resources
available under different schemes in order to ensure effective rehabilitation of released
bonded laborers. This Act is not adequate enough to identify and liberate all bonded laborers
in the country particularly in the tribal areas. The Act requires amendments so as to provide
more stringent punishment for the offences. Educational and.
Economic Safeguards For SCs/STs The various safeguards under this head as contained in,
Article 15(4), 16(l)(4)(4A), 29(2), 46 and 335 are discussed below: 15(4) Nothing in this
Article or in clause (2) of Article 29 shall prevent the State from making any special
provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens
or for the scheduled castes and the scheduled tribes. 16(4) Nothing in this Article shall
prevent the State from making any provision for the reservation of appointments or posts in
favour of any backward class of citizens which, in the opinion of the State, is not adequately
represented in the services under the State. 29(2) No citizen shall be denied admission into
any educational institution maintained by the State or receiving aid out of State funds on
grounds only of religion, race, caste, language or any of them.
Special Grants under Article 275: Article 275(l) provides that there shall be paid out of the
Consolidated Fund of India as grants-in-aid of the revenues of State such capital and
recurring sum as may be necessary to enable that state to meet the cost of such schemes of
development as may be undertaken by the state with the approval of the Government of India
for the purpose of promoting the welfare of scheduled tribes in that State or raising the level
of administration of the Scheduled Areas therein to that of the administration of the rest of the
areas of that state. During the Eighth Five Year Plan Rs.54,000 lakh was released to the State
Governments under this provision. The amount released during 1997-98, 1998-99 and 1999-
2000 (upto Jan., 2000) was Rs. 25,000 lakh. A similar provision exists in the Article for
paying such special grants to the States covered under the Sixth Schedule of the Consolidated
Fund of India' Other Safeguards Article 330 Reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes in the House of the People— (1) Seats will be reserved in the House of the
People for—
(a) the Scheduled Castes;
(b) The Scheduled Tribes except the Scheduled Tribes in the autonomous districts of Assam;
and
(c) The Scheduled Tribes in the autonomous districts of Assam.
(2) The number of seats reserved in any State 6, or Union territory for the Scheduled Castes
or the Scheduled Tribes under clause (1) shall bear, as nearly as may be, the same proportion
to the total number of seats allotted to the States 6 or by the Constitution (Eighty-first
Amendment) Act, 2000 Subs. by the Constitution (Fifty-first Amendment) Act, 1984, s. 2, for
sub-clause (b) (w. e. f. 16-6-1986.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in clause (2), the number of seats reserved in the
House of the People for the Scheduled Tribes in the autonomous districts of Assam shall bear
to the total number of seats allotted to that State a proportion not less than the population of
Scheduled Tribes in the said autonomous districts bears to the total population of the State].
Article 332: Reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the
Legislative Assemblies of the States—
(1) Seats shall be reserved for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, [except the
Scheduled Tribes in the autonomous districts of Assam], in the Legislative Assembly of
every State 10 (2) Seats shall be reserved also for the autonomous districts in the Legislative
Assembly of the State of Assam.
(3) The number of seats reserved for the Scheduled Castes or the Scheduled Tribes in the
Legislative Assembly of any State under clause (1) shall bear, as nearly as may be, the same
proportion to the total number of seats in the Assembly as the population of the Scheduled
Castes in the State or of the Scheduled Tribes in the State or part of the State, as the case may
be, in respect of which seats are so reserved, bears to the total population of the State. The
number of seats reserved for an autonomous district in the Legislative Assembly of the State
of Assam shall bear to the total number of seats in that Assembly a proportion not less than
the population of the district bears to the total population of the State. The constituencies for
the seats reserved for any autonomous district of Assam shall not comprise any area outside
that district13. No person who is not a member of a Scheduled Tribe of any autonomous
district of the State of Assam shall be eligible for election to the Legislative Assembly of the
State from any constituency of that district.
Article 334:
Reservation of seats and special representation to cease after 14[sixty years]—
Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this Part, the provisions of this
Constitution relating to—
(a) the reservation of seats for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in the House
of the People and in the Legislative Assemblies of the States; and
(b) the representation of the Anglo-Indian community in the House of the People and in the
Legislative Assemblies of the States by nomination, shall cease to have effect on the
expiration of a period of 14[sixty years] from the commencement of this Constitution:
Provided that nothing in this Article shall affect any representation in the House of the People
or in the Legislative Assembly of a State until the dissolution of the then existing House or
Assembly, as the case may be.
Article 335: Claims of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes to services and posts— The
claims of the members of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes shall be taken into
consideration, consistently with the maintenance of efficiency of administration, in the
making of appointments to services and posts in connection with the affairs of the Union or
of a State. Provided that nothing in this Article shall prevent in making of any provision in
favour of the members of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes for relaxation in
qualifying Special Officer/Commission.
Article 338: National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Schedule Tribes— See the
Constitution (Sixty-fifth Amendment) Act, 1990 under the heading Central Acts constituting
National Commissions for Welfare of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and Other
Backward Classes. 0riginally Article 338 of the Constitution (amended in 1990) provided for
a Special Officer known as the Commissioner for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
to investigate all matters relating to the safeguards provided for the Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes under the Constitution and to report to the President on their working. It
was felt that a high level five-member Commission under Article 338 will be a more effective
arrangement in respect of the Constitutional safeguards for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled
Tribes than a single Special Officer. It was also felt that it was necessary to elaborate the
functions of the said commission so as to cover measures that should be taken by the Union
or any State for the effective implementation of those safeguards and other measures for the
protection, welfare and socioeconomic development of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled
Tribes and to entrust to the Commission such other functions in relation to the protection,
welfare and development and advancement of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes as
the President may decide, subject to any law made by Parliament and the Legislature of the
States.
The builders of Indian Republic and founding fathers of our Constitutions had considered it
necessary to provide specific safeguards and rights in the constitution for the uplift of
Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) communities in India. The Constitution of
India provides for a number of safeguards for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
which are of its unique features. Reservation is indeed the process of setting aside a certain
percentage of seats vacancies in educational institutions, government institutions and
legislative institutions for the members of weaker sections in modern times.
RIGHTS OF PRISONERS
The law on the rights of prisoners has been an evolving one. It is a matter of utmost shame
that a country like India doesn‘t have codified law on the rights of prisoners. There is also no
comprehensive legislation to deal with prisoners rights and regulate their conduct while in
jail. However, the judiciary of the country has given due recognition to the convicts and held
their fundamental rights time and time again. In the absence of thorough legislation, it has
managed to set precedents and principles upholding the various rights of prisoners that not
only guide but also bind all the courts in India.
As emphasized earlier, the conviction of a human does not render him non-human. He still
remains a human who should be treated like one. He should be given the basic human rights
available to every man walking on the earth. But at the same time, he should not be treated as
a free man with all absolute rights and luxuries. His freedom should be subject to certain
limitations and legal restrictions. These restrictions, in addition, should be reasonable.
The apex court of the USA in the case of Charles Wolff v. McDonnell and the Supreme Court
of India in its famous cases like DBM Patnaik v. State of Andhra Pradesh and, Sunil Batra v.
Delhi Administration has emphatically stated that it must be realised that a prisoner is a
human being as well as a natural person or a legal person. If a person gets convicted for a
crime, it does not reduce him to the status of a non-person whose rights could be snatched
away at the whims of the prison administration. Therefore, imposing any major punishment
within the system of prison is conditional upon the absence of procedural safeguards.
The Supreme Court of India has been deliberating with the central and state governments
since a long time to improve the deteriorating condition of the prisoners which is fundamental
because of the overcrowding of prisons, lack of training facilities, personnel and poor
infrastructure, etc. Therefore, it is mandatory to invoke the rights and constitutional
safeguards of the prisoners. Such rights of, unless they are propagated and implemented in
each corner and the entire perimeter of the prism, are a nullity and betrayal of human faith on
the criminal justice delivery system.
Fundamental Rights
Fundamental rights form the core of human rights in India. They are the basic rights of the
citizens which cannot be taken away under any circumstances. The law of the country also
guarantees some of these rights to the prisoners too like Article 14, 19, 21. However, it
cannot impose the fundamental rights in its full panoply to the advantage of the prisoners.
Giving prisoners Right to Fair procedure forms the soul of Article 21. Levying
reasonableness in any restriction is the essence of Article 19(5) and sweeping discretion
degenerating into arbitrary discrimination is anathema for Article 14.
Right to Privacy
The Right to Privacy is one of the very significant rights available to the citizens of India.
They form an intrinsic part of Right to Life and Personal Liberty under Article 21 of the
Indian Constitution. They have also been made applicable to the prisoners and convicts
through various judgements passed by courts over the years.
In India, however, this right is perhaps the most violated. The right to privacy in respect to
search and seizure was first raised in the 1950s, where the apex court ruled that search and
seizure cannot be seen as violate of Article 19 (1)(f) of the Indian constitution and a mere
search by itself does not nullify or harm an individual‘s right to property. Even if search or
seizure affected such right then its effect is temporary and is to be construed as a reasonable
restriction on the rights of individuals.
The validity of solitary confinement was considered by the Supreme Court in the famous case
of Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration wherein the honourable court highlighted that
imposition of solitary confinement is only to be made in exceptional cases where the prisoner
is of such violent or dangerous nature that his segregation becomes an utmost necessity. The
court also observed that keeping prisoners in bar fetters day and night reduces them to the
level of an animal and deteriorates their mental health. The courts, therefore, have presented
strong resentment against solitary and stated its confinement as highly dehumanizing and
derogatory in nature. They have also held such confinements to be against the spirit of the
Constitution of India.
In the case of Parmannd Katara v. Union of India, the court held that a doctor working at a
Government hospital is bound by duty to extend any type of medical assistance for preserving
life. In fact, every doctor has a professional obligation of extending his services to the
patients (be it anyone) with due diligence and expertise in order to protect his life. Therefore,
any legal body cannot intervene to cause a delay in the discharge of obligations and duties
cast upon the members of the medical profession. The court also reiterated in Paschim Bengal
Khet Mazdoor Samiti v. State of West Bengal, that a government hospital cannot deny any
patient the right to treatment on the grounds of non-availability of beds. Doing so would
amount to a breach of Article 21 that highlights the ‗right to life‘. This article imposes strict
obligations on the State to make available the necessary medical assistance to an aggrieved
person as protection of human life is of utmost significance.
The parliament has enacted the Legal Services Authorities Act in 1987 wherein it guaranteed
legal Aid. It also directed various state governments to set up Legal Aid and Advice Boards,
and frame schemes aiming to provide Free Legal Aid. This was done so that the
Constitutional mandate of Article 39-A could be given an effect. If we look into the
jurisprudence of Indian Human Rights, it can be said that legal aid is of wider dimension and
it is available in civil, administrative or revenue cases other than just criminal cases.
In the case of Madhav Hayawadanrao Hoskot v. the State Of Maharashtra, the three-judge
bench of the Supreme Court of India read Articles 21 and Articles 39-A along with Article
142 and Section 304 of CrPC together emphasized that the government of the country is
under a duty to aid and provide legal services to the convicted or accused individual.
The patterns and manner of use of instruments of restraint shall be decided by the central
prison administration. Such instruments must not be applied for any longer time than is
strictly necessary.
Right to Education
Right to education is a Fundamental Right and therefore it should be given to every citizen of
the country. Along with education, it is compulsory that the right type of education should be
imparted. In Mohammad Giasuddin v. State of AP, the court tried to regulate the manner of
work and education provided to the inmates of the jail. It directed the state government to
look into the nature of work and education given to the prisoners and check that the work
provided is ―not of a monotonous, mechanical, intellectual or like type mixed with a title
manual labour…‖. The court further stated the facilities of liaison through correspondence
courses must also be given to the prisoners who are interested in doing higher or advanced
studies. Moreover, basic learning such as tailoring, embroidery, doll-making should be
extended to the women prisoners. In addition to that, the well-educated prisoners should be
given the opportunities to engage in some sort of mental-cum-manual productive work.
The court further added ―all the restraints on liberty, that no knowledge, learning and pursuit
of happiness is the most irksome and least justifiable. Improvement of mind cannot be
thwarted but for exceptional and just circumstances. It is well known that books of education
and universal praise have been written in prison cells.‖
Right to publication
The Supreme Court held in a case wherein the prisoner was not allowed to read a scientific
book that there was nothing in the Bombay Detention Order, 1951 that prohibits a prisoner
from writing or publishing a book. It stated that the book prisoner wanted to read was merely
a work of science, (―Inside the Atom‖) and it could not be regarded as detrimental to public
interest or safety as provided under the Defence of India Rules, 1962.
Prisoners do not cease to be human beings when put behind bars. The Supreme Court and
many other courts of India have reiterated this position in several cases so that prisoners do
not become a victim themselves. And are provided with a proper rehabilitative environment
to help them improve and become better beings. It is incumbent upon the Central and State
governments to not only provide the prisoners with humane conditions for a living but also
educate them about their rights so that it is not abused by the powerful inside the prison.
It could be said that the judiciary of the country has played a crucial role in safeguarding the
rights of prisoners whenever the legislative and executive have erred. It has acted as the
saviour of the convicts and upheld their fundamental rights time and time again. It has
thoroughly exercised its powers through judicial activism and has repeatedly devised new
remedies and tools to protect the human‘s right to life and personal liberty. However, much
still needs to be done. In this regard, the wide circulation of human rights‘ available to
prisoners, vast publicity of prisoners right in media and corner to corner surveillance in
prisons could be some of the keys for upholding the rights of prisoners and ensuring their safe
space in the prison.
In India, we have multiple religions, cultures, traditions and heritage. There are 8 Major
religious belief systems with their distinct heritage and culture. From Kashmir to
Kanyakumari there are 22 official languages with more than 800 dialects available. In a tight-
knit democratic society like India, minority groups are respected for being different and
although they enjoy minority rights in community with others belonging to a minority group
is an individual choice.
Minority word comes from the Latin word ‗Minor‘ and joins with the ‗ity‘ suffix to make
meaning of ‗small in number‘. According to the United Nations, ‗Any group or community
which is socially, politically and economically non-dominant and inferior in the population
are minorities.‘ The constitution of India has not defined the word ‗minority‘ anywhere.
Historical background behind the protection of minority rights under the Constitution
In the past, the invasions in Ancient and Medieval India generated minority communities like
Muslims, Anglo- Indians, Christians etc. India became a conglomeration of Minorities
because of migration of communities fearing religious persecution like Parsis, Divide and
rule policy of British colonial power etc. The objective resolution moved by Pandit
Jawaharlal Nehru in the Constituent Assembly on 13th December 1946, unanimously adopted
by Constituent Assembly on 22nd January 1947 where it was decided that a safeguard
mechanism will be adopted for minority communities, depressed backward classes and tribal
areas of the nation.
The Constitutional drafting committee had formulated various provisions and laws in 1948,
under the name of ―Special Provisions Relating to Minorities‖ in part XIV and numbered in
292-301 article. The provisions for special rights of minorities were modified substantially
and finally, no special rights except cultural and educational were concerned to minorities.
The constitution which was adopted by the Constituent Assembly of India in November 1949
and came into force on 26th January, 1950 with no reservation of seats in the Legislative
bodies and public services for religious minorities as originally planned. The religious
minorities from the purview of group-preference requirements were excluded because the
Constituent Assembly held that control to such protections was reliable only for the
development of backward and not to conserve the distinct cultural personalities.
Minority rights in India protect people from being discriminated against on grounds of their
ethnic cultural, linguistic or religious identity. Individuals belonging to minorities must be
able to learn and use their language, use their own names, preserve and freely express their
identity. Minority rights, therefore, guarantee equality before the law, protection of basic
freedom, non-discrimination and protection against violence on the grounds of identity,
participation in political and public life, possibilities for cooperation with other communities
and organisations within states and across borders. Rights of Minorities are the inherent part
of human rights. They promote tolerance and respect for diversity. Their aim is to ensure that
minorities and majorities live peacefully together and support each other in building a better
future.
There are 2 Articles under cultural and educational rights In the Indian Constitution – Article
29 and Article 30. Article 29 of the Constitution states the protection of interests for
minorities. Its clause (1) states that any group living within the jurisdiction of India is entitled
to preserve and promote its own language, script or literature and culture. Clause (2) of it
prohibits denial of admission to educational institutions which are aided by the state on the
ground of race, caste, religion or language protection.
This provision protects the rights of citizens irrespective of his/her belonging community.
Article 30 is one of the very important to the minorities of India. Article 30(1) gives a
provision to the minority communities to establish and administer an educational institute of
their choice for protection of their culture and heritage. Sub clause 30(1A) of it has
strengthened the minority educational institutions in case of compulsory acquisition. The
state has to keep in mind that the amount which is needed for the acquisition of the property
should not restrict the right guaranteed by the clause (1). According to Article 30(2), the
government should not discriminate against any educational institution run by any minority
group regardless of religion or the language, while giving aid.
Opposed to the traditional view Article 29‘s scope is wider than Article 30 because Article 30
deals with only 2 kinds of minority that are religious and linguistic and Article 29 deals with
any citizen of Indian citizens including the majority. Article 29 can only be applied to the
citizens of India while Article 30 can be applied for both citizens as well as non-citizens of
India. The Supreme Court has ruled in S.K. Patro v. State of Bihar, that a minority
community can only claim the privileges under Article 30 must be a minority person who is
residing in India. Foreigners who are not resident or nor a citizen in Indian do not come
within the scope of Article 30.
But this judgement was overruled by TMA Pai Foundation case. The Supreme Court held
that the unaided institutions since they do not receive any aid from the state out of the state
fund are not subject to the admission procedure established by the state. It meant that they
can follow their own admission procedure including their own admission test provided the
admission is based on merit, an open and transparent system. Similarly, they are not bound by
the fee structure provided by the state, provided do not collect any capitation fees. The court
has granted the power to the state to fix quotas for minority students. This case drew
distinction between aided and unaided governmental regulation on private institutions.
In P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra, the Supreme Court held that the policy of
reservation to admit students is not applicable to minority institutions. The state has no power
to reserve seats in educational institutions. The admission process can be based on an
admission test or merit.
In Azeez Basha v. Union of India (Aligarh Muslim University Case), the Supreme Court held
that an educational institution, not been formulated by the minority community then they
have no right to direct it. AMU is not a minority institution as established by Act of
Parliament. The term ‗established‘ and ‗administered‘ have to be read in consideration. Status
of minority to AMU struck down in Dr. Naresh Agarwal v. UOI case.
Article 38 ensures that the state to secure a social order for the promotion of welfare of
people permeated by justice- social, economic and political and to minimise inequalities in
income, status, facilities and opportunities.
Article 39 states free legal assistance and equal justice of various dimensions. It directs the
state to secure livelihood for all the citizens, equitable distribution of material properties for
the common good. It also gives provision for the prevention of concentration of wealth, equal
pay for equal work and for giving opportunities, facilities to the children for the development.
Article 46 is about Gandhian principles. It provides that the state may take necessary action
to promote educational and economic advancement of the weaker sections of the people and
to protect them from social injustice and exploitation.
Article 347 provides power to the President to officially recognize a language, which is being
spoken by the substantial population.
Articles 331, 333, 334, 336 and 337 have the special provisions of guaranteeing
representation of Anglo Indians in Union and State legislatures.
Article 350(B) gives provision for appointing a Special Officer for linguistic minorities.
A history of clashes, an active fertile ground for communal violence and difference-making it
vulnerable for minorities on different grounds and opportunities in India. Thus, there is a
need to preserve their identity and safeguards to the minority rights on social, economic and
political fronts. The Constitution of India provides many ways through which the minorities
protect their rights. Also, it offers special rights and freedoms to the minority community to
conserve its democratic character. But in reality, minorities give birth to various problems.
For instance, India has declared itself as a secular country. So, the spirit of our constitution is
secular. All political parties in India claim to be secular but in practice, none follows it. In
India, the political parties play a major role in politicising a religious issue for vote banks.
Though there are many problems like this the solution has to be faced with understanding.
Still, the court is not able to define minority and have been for interpretation of court
according to the circumstances. Art. 30 & Art. 29 are pretty wide in scope and they need to
give complete choice to the minority section to establish and administer any institution as per
their understanding.
In the case of Mr. ‗X‘ v. Hospital ‗Z‘, the Supreme Court talks about the various rights of
AIDS patients from various perspectives. The main issues that were dealt by the court were
whether (i) right to marry is an absolute right, (ii) AIDS patients have a right to marry and
right to privacy, (iii) the right to health takes precedence over the right to privacy, (iv)
Medical practitioners have an obligation not to disclose the AIDS disease and identity of the
patient, etc. The issues on privacy were dealt with in detail in other landmark judgments like
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy and Ors. Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors.
Article 14 of the Constitution guarantees the right of equality to every person which includes
treatment for HIV/AIDS patients.
Article 21 of the Constitution protects their right to life and personal liberty which also
includes their right to privacy.
The Directive Principles of State Policy lays down certain duties of the states towards AIDS
patients. Article 38 and 39 talks about the duty of the state to promote social welfare and
secure them with social and economic resources respectively. However, these duties are not
enforceable in the courts of law.
Article 39 of the Constitution asks the states to ensure all the citizens including the
HIV/AIDS patients have an adequate means of livelihood.
Article 42 lays down a duty upon states to make provisions for securing just and humane
conditions of work.
Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (Professional Conduct, & Ethics) Regulations, 2002
The Medical Council of India entrusts upon certain duties that have to be observed by the
doctors towards HIV/AIDS patients in Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (Professional
Conduct, & Ethics) Regulations, 2002. These are given as follows:
Duty to take care and informed consent from the patient before attending to any medical
procedure.
Duty to disclose to the patient the risk associated with the treatment.
Duty to inform about options available and their benefits.
Duty to warn the patient of the harm and precautions.
Duty to admit a patient in an emergency without consent.
The duty of the physician to not abandon his patient for fear of contracting the disease
himself.
The Bill asks for voluntary, free, and informed consent from the patients before their medical
history or information is collected and used for research purposes. On the counterpart, the
AIDs patients are also imposed with the duty to not spread the disease further through
potential means. Hence the Bill confirms the confidentiality clause, but in necessary
circumstances, the information or medical history of the patients can be revealed. AIDS
patients have access to robust and universal access therapies for prevention, care, and
support. The Bill protects risk-reduction strategies from civil and criminal liabilities, as well
as harassment by law enforcement. This Bill also provides provisions related to the right to
information and education relating to health and the protection of health from the State. It
lays special focus on women and children. The bill requires the state to implement IEC
programs that are evidence-based, age-appropriate, gender-sensitive, non-stigmatizing, and
non-discriminatory.
The Bill has provision for the appointment of a health ombudsman in every district so that
easy and quick access to health services could be provided to all persons. Redressal of
complaints and a platform to internal complaint mechanisms are also provided. There are
fast-track courts that deal with the complaints at a much faster rate and provide creative
redressals. The Bill also establishes a link between sexual violence and the victims being
prone to the disease more than others, hence it provides for counseling and treatments for
sexual assault survivors and asks the states for the setting up of sexual assault crisis centers. It
also recognizes certain rights for children and women who are in care homes, and
dormitories, as due to their social, and economic conditions they find themselves more prone
to AIDS.
According to the proposed bill, the screening process or testing could not be an essential
requirement for any kind of employment. Even the patients could not be denied access to
public places, education, or any form of enjoyment due to the same reason. Even in the
workplace, proper measures must be taken in order to make a healthy and non-discriminatory
space for the patients to work.
The Bill also makes a safeguard provision against a minor who hasn‘t attained the age of 18
years and any women who are evicted, and they possess the right to live in a shared property.
In the aim of deterring rampant victimization of HIV/AIDS patients, the medical costs would
be taken into consideration when settlement for maintenance is calculated.
The Bill also says that no one can be forced to take an HIV test. Proper counseling must be
accompanied by detailing out the pros and cons before that person goes into the stage of
making the choice. The consent must be taken voluntarily, and it must be informed. Under no
circumstance can a patient be asked to reveal his status, with an exception of the courts
asking to do so.
The other legislation, policies, and agencies that protect HIV/AIDS patients
Antiviral Therapy Guidelines for HIV-infected Adults and Adolescents including Post-
exposure.
Legal provisions under Indian law- Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Acquired
Immunodeficiency Syndrome (Prevention and Control) Act, 2017
The Indian Parliament has passed the Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Acquired
Immunodeficiency Syndrome (Prevention and Control) Act, 2017 that recognizes and talks
about the rights of HIV/AIDS persons. This Act establishes antiretroviral therapy as a legal
right of HIV/AIDS patients and states that ―every person in the care and custody of the state
shall have right to HIV prevention, testing, treatment, and counseling services.‖ This act also
asks the states to provide treatment that shall be accessible and with management centers. It
also talks about measures that could be taken by the states to curb the issue of stigmatization
of the stakeholders as explained in the following points.
I) Right to Treatment
This Act provides a special right to HIV/AIDS persons regarding treatment. This Act, in
addition to providing treatment, specifies the treatment of Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) and
holds governments accountable for providing it. The following provisions are crucial in this
regard.
Section 13 states that the Central Government and State Government, as the case may be,
shall take all such measures as it deems necessary and crucial for the prevention of the spread
of HIV infection or AIDS in accordance with the guidelines.
Section 14 states that the measures to be taken by the Central Government or the State
Government under section 13 shall include the measures for providing, as far as possible,
diagnostic facilities relating to HIV or AIDS, Antiretroviral Therapy, and Opportunistic
Infection Management to patients living with HIV or AIDS. Further, the Central Government
shall issue necessary guidelines in respect of protocols for HIV and AIDS relating to
diagnostic facilities, Antiretroviral Therapy, and Opportunistic Infection Management which
shall apply to all persons and shall ensure their wide dissemination.
2) Confidentiality
According to Section 8 of the Act, Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for
the time being in force:
(i) No person shall be compelled to disclose his HIV status except by an order of the court
that the disclosure of such information is necessary for the interest of justice for the
determination of issues in the matter before it;
(ii) No person shall disclose or be compelled to disclose the HIV status or any other private
information of another person imparted in confidence or in a relationship of a fiduciary
nature, except with the informed consent of that other person or a representative of such
another person obtained in the manner as specified in Section 5, as the case may be, and the
fact of such consent has been recorded in writing by the person making such disclosure:
Provided that, in case of a relationship of a fiduciary nature, informed consent shall be
recorded in writing.
(2)The informed consent for disclosure of HIV-related information under clause (ii) of
subsection (1) is not required where the disclosure is made:
(a) by a healthcare provider to another healthcare provider who is involved in the care,
treatment, or counseling of such person, when such disclosure is necessary to provide care or
treatment to that person;
(b) by an order of a court that the disclosure of such information is necessary for the interest
of justice for the determination of issues and in the matter before it;
(c) in suits or legal proceedings between persons, where the disclosure of such information is
necessary for filing suits or legal proceedings or for instructing their counsel;
(a) the denial of, or termination from, employment or occupation, unless, in the case of
termination, the person, who is otherwise qualified, is furnished with-
(i) a copy of the written assessment of a qualified and independent healthcare provider
competent to do so that such protected person poses a significant risk of transmission of HIV
to another person in the workplace, or is unfit to perform the duties of the job; and
(ii) a copy of a written statement by the employer stating the nature and extent of
administrative or financial hardship for not providing him reasonable accommodation;
(b) the unfair treatment in, or in relation to, employment or occupation;
(c) the denial or discontinuation of, or, unfair treatment in, healthcare services;
(d) the denial or discontinuation of, or unfair treatment in, educational, establishments and
services thereof;
e) the denial or discontinuation of, or unfair treatment with regard to, access to, or provision
or enjoyment or use of any goods, accommodation, service, facility, benefit, privilege or
opportunity dedicated to the use of the general public or customarily available to the public,
whether or not for a fee, including shops, public restaurants, hotels and places of public
entertainment or the use of wells, tanks, bathing ghats, roads, burial grounds or funeral
ceremonies and places of public resort;
(f) the denial, or, discontinuation of, or unfair treatment with regard to, the right of
movement;
(g) the denial or discontinuation of, or, unfair treatment with regard to, the right to reside,
purchase, rent, or otherwise occupy, any property;
(h) the denial or discontinuation of, or, unfair treatment in, the opportunity to stand for, or,
hold public or private office;
(i) the denial of access to, removal from, or unfair treatment in, Government or private
establishment in whose care or custody a person may be;
(j) the denial of, or unfair treatment in, the provision of insurance unless supported by
actuarial studies;
(k) the isolation or segregation of a protected person;
(l) HIV testing as a prerequisite for obtaining employment, or accessing healthcare services
or education or, for the continuation of the same or, for accessing or using any other service
or facility:
Provided that, in case of failure to furnish the written assessment under subclause (i) of clause
(a), it shall be presumed that there is no significant risk and that the person is fit to perform
the duties of the job, as the case may be, and in case of the failure to furnish the written
statement under sub-clause (ii) of that clause, it shall be presumed that there is no such undue
administrative or financial hardship.
Even though there are no comprehensive laws on the rights of AIDS patients in India, the
judiciary over the years has done a magnificent job in interpreting their rights through
landmark cases. The issues that took up a lot of time to decide on were whether AIDS
patients have a right to privacy regarding their HIV positive status, whether they have a right
to marry and whether that right is absolute or not, and whether doctors have a legal obligation
to disclose the HIV positive status to the concerned person and so on. The Apex Court of
India has timely dealt with such questions and came up with appropriate and creative
solutions.
In April 2017, the government through Bills stressed equality among people and equal
opportunity at work and other things. It aimed to cancel out discrimination at the workplace,
and provide that even an AIDS patient has the right to employment. It tries to promote the
right of the dignity of all human beings and asks to curb the stigmas already associated with
it. Everyone including AIDS patients must be treated with equality, and the law tries to cast
the same notion.
The judgments and laws also implicitly remind Indian legislators that laws dealing with
divorce in India, such as the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, the
Special Marriage Act, 1954, and the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act 1936, need to be
amended to explicitly include AIDS as one of the grounds for divorce Such amendments are
needed as it also provides rights to the innocent spouses who have a higher risk to get
affected by the infection.
LGBT- RIGHTS
A section of society that is mostly sidelined and unheard is the LGBT section. LGBT people
are a minority but have equal constitutional rights. However, their right to equality and equal
treatment in society is violated on a regular basis. Not only does society as a whole treats
them differently, but so does the state machinery. They are frequent victims of human rights
violations. They have made serious strides for their acceptance . The previous decade was the
decade of LGBT rights. Around the world, LGBT human rights are coming into mainstream
focus. Many were visible in public and in law courts demanding their rights. As a result,
various advances are made in many countries regarding this. When it comes to India LGBT
rights have been a contentious issue for many years. After the landmark judgment of 2018 by
the Supreme Court, the sexual minorities are finally a step closer to living a dignified life in
society. Even though the ruling has been in effect for three years, they continue to fight for
their rights. Before proceeding with the rights and protections available for LGBT, let‘s
define who they are and what are their problems in our society.
What is LGBT?
The initialize for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender is LGBT. Activists began to use
this initial in the US from 1988. Sometimes it‘s also said to be LGBTQ for which Q stands
for those who are identified as Queer or are questioning their identity. These initials are
combined to form LGBTIQ (7) or LGBT+. The LGBTQ are distinct groups of gay culture.
These people are usually underrepresented or are left out in various researches.
Homosexuality is the sexual or emotional attraction towards the same-sex person [15]. An
ancient diplomatic material – Arthasastra – does not sanction homosexual intercourse. It was
treated as an awful minor offense. Within Manusmriti lesbianism was a serious offence and
had severe punishments. The Shariat law of Muslims also treats homosexualism as a serious
offense. History says that it was the 18th century British rule that criminalized and prohibited
homosexual relations in India under section 377 of IPC saying that it‘s against the order of
nature.
There are several arguments raised against IPC Section 377. These arguments state that the
section abridges human dignity. The constitution of India makes it mandatory to provide
equality to all and so it is the right of everyone including the LGBT to express their views,
wishes, and choices. The section fueled the issue of non-acceptance of the LGBT people
which was prevalent since long. It creates a barrier to the community‘s development and
country‘s economic growth.
Criminalization violates the basic fundamental rights of LGBT people as a citizen who is
abiding by the Indian constitution.
Article 14 provides the right to equality. It states that no one should be denied equality before
the law and equal protection of law/
Article 15(1) and 20 prohibits discrimination of a person on any grounds like sex, religion,
race, caste, or place of birth. It is the discrimination on the basis of sex that the LGBT section
lacks educational and job facilities and is denied equal pay for equal work. The Indian
constitution states that although the term ‗sex‘ refers to male and female, it is broad enough
for sexual orientations to include in it.
Article 19 allows this freedom of speech and expression to all the citizens
Article 21 provides the right to life and private liberty which encompasses the right to
privacy. The Indian Constitution does not expressly grant the right to privacy as a
fundamental right, but it has been emphasized from time to time by the Supreme Court in
some cases, so it is considered to be in the vicinity of fundamental rights. As a result, the
state‘s right to privacy must not be infringed upon.
LGBTQIA+ community
Apart from facing regular discrimination and harassment at the workplace, there are some
other reasons also to substantiate that the present employment laws are not inclusive of the
LGBTQIA+ community.
As essentially employment and labour laws touch various aspects of employment such as
employment benefits, terms and conditions, gratuity benefits, insurance, anti-discriminatory
policies, maternity benefits etc, discussing each in detail is beyond the scope of the article.
However, some of the points are discussed below:
i) Workmen’s Compensations Act, 1923
Although Section 2 of this act provides a comprehensive list of dependants, but all these
terms are defined only in the reference with the heterosexual families.
Further, it‘s very essential to define the ―dependants‖ because dependants are entitled to the
monetary benefit. Under the worker compensation insurance, it is mandatory for every
employee to nominate at least one dependent. Therefore the term ―dependants‖ must be
redefined in the context of same-sex unions and LGBTQIA+ families to provide them equal
incentives in employment as available to a heterosexual individual.
Maternity Benefits
At present Maternity Benefit Act of 1961 provides maternity leaves and benefits only to the
cis-gendered women who give birth, adopt or rely on surrogacy to have a child. Essentially
speaking there are two implications of this law.
Firstly, it reiterates the same archaic ideas and notions that it is the sole responsibility of the
mother to take care of and nurture the child while the father can be waived off this duty.
Secondly, it does not take into cognizance the fact that there can be a possibility of alternate
families such as the LGBTQIA+ families.
Therefore it is essential that the language of this law must be gender-neutral so that even
LGBT+ families can also have access to parental benefits and further it can also serve as a
progressive step in the direction to eliminate sexual biases reinforced by the maternity benefit
legislation.
It is submitted that although the landmark 2018 court ruling and 2014 NALSA judgment
were a huge leap in the advancement of LGBT+ rights movements in India. But still, the
LGBT people in India are not equal and don‘t have the same rights as those available to a
heterosexual person. Further, they are still subjected to violence, discrimination in all spheres
of life.
It is very important to educate people about LGBT rights. Human rights are natural rights
which are inalienable, indestructible and are conferred upon everyone since birth. It is
essential that people take note of the fact that homosexuals are not sick, they are not aliens,
their sexual orientation is perfectly in tune with the dictate of nature.
LGBTQ rights should be recognised as part of human rights. Non Recognition of same-sex
marriages, not allowing adoption, guardianship, surrogacy, IVF, not having access to safe and
LGBT+ inclusive schools, colleges and workplaces are all violative of Article 14, 15, 19, 21,
29. Further, discrimination solely on the grounds of sexual orientation violates Article 14, 15,
21 in relation to Army, Navy, Air force Act.
The universal law of Human Rights states social norms, custom, culture or traditions can
never be a valid justification to suppress another individual from asserting his/her
fundamental and constitutional rights.
If we start justifying everything on the basis of cultural views, societal values and public
policy then there would have been no progressive legislation enacted in our country and we
would have never been able to eliminate the social evils of child marriage, Sati, dowry, and
infanticide etc.
So, it is essential that the government must wipe away its conservative nature and should take
concrete steps to eliminate the stigma, discrimination and abuse surrounding the LGBTQIA+
people. It is high time the government should formulate new laws or amend existing laws on
marriage, adoption, guardianship, inheritance educational institutions, employment,
healthcare services etc for education, social security and health of LGBT+ people with
special focus to Transgender Persons.
It will lead to greater inclusiveness and will help in bringing the LGBTQIA+ into the
mainstream of society and can go a long way in ‗transforming our nation sustainably into an
equitable and vibrant knowledge society‘
Lastly, I will conclude this article by saying that until and unless the government gives the
LGBTQIA+ people in India an equal status, just and the fair struggle for social recognition
by LGBT+ will go on.