Title: Heterometallic Feed Ratio-Dominated Oxygen Evolution Activity
Title: Heterometallic Feed Ratio-Dominated Oxygen Evolution Activity
Authors: En-Cui Yang, Rui-Jie Li, Yu-Feng Qi, Qian Wang, Jia-Jun
Wang, Zheng-Yu Liu, Xiu-Guang Wang, and Xiao-Jun Zhao
This manuscript has been accepted after peer review and appears as an
Accepted Article online prior to editing, proofing, and formal publication
of the final Version of Record (VoR). This work is currently citable by
using the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) given below. The VoR will be
published online in Early View as soon as possible and may be different
to this Accepted Article as a result of editing. Readers should obtain
the VoR from the journal website shown below when it is published
to ensure accuracy of information. The authors are responsible for the
content of this Accepted Article.
Rui-Jie Li,[a] Yu-Feng Qi,[a] Qian Wang,[a] Jia-Jun Wang,[a] Zheng-Yu Liu,[a] Xiu-Guang Wang,[a] Xiao-Jun
Accepted Manuscript
To Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. (Article)
Abstract. Developing earth-abundant, highly active and long-term durable electrocatalysts for oxygen
evolution reaction (OER) is highly desirable and great challenging for large-scale industrial application of
electrochemical water splitting. Herein, in-situ growth of uniform nanosheet arrays on nickel foam (NF) is
hydrothermally achieved by varying feed ratios of Fe(III) and Ni(II) salts. The feed ratio of the two active
metals has significantly dominated both the morphological and electronic structures of the resultant
Accepted Manuscript
electrocatalysts, leading to feed ratio-dependent volcano-type OER activity. The optimized
Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC/NF exhibits the best OER performance, affording a low overpotential of 220 mV to drive
a current density of 50 mA·cm 2 with small Tafel slope of 44.8 mV·dec 1 and long-lasting stability over 20
hour. The synergistic effect from the Fe(III) and Ni(II) species on both the morphological and electronic
structure modulations have dramatically accelerated the reaction kinetics, responsible eventually for the
enhanced OER activity. This work provides valuable information for nanostructured MOFs as efficient
electrocatalysts.
Introduction
Increasing concerns on both environmental pollution and energy crisis have offered significant necessity
and urgent demand for finding new alternative and clean energy sources.[1, 2] Hydrogen production from
electrocatalytic water splitting, one of important ways to produce green and sustainable hydrogen energy,
has received tremendous interest due to highly efficient energy storage and conversion.[3] However, the
Accepted Manuscript
sluggish kinetics and low efficiency make the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) on the anode of the
electrocatalytic cell become the bottleneck of the electrocatalytic water splitting.[4] Therefore, it is
essentially important and urgent to design earth-abundant, high-performance and long-term durable OER
electrocatalyst to replace highly active but expensive and scarce noble metal-based nanomaterials (IrO2,
Self-supported metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) with inexpensive transition metals or metal clusters
and functionlized organic ligands in situ grown on the conductive substrates have emerging as promising
OER electrocatalysts due to their adjustable compositions, well-tailorable microstructures, and increased
conductivity.[6 11] Up to date, lots of layered monometallic Co-, Ni-, Fe- and bimetallic NiFe-, FeCo-,
on) have been directly anchored on the three-dimensional conductive Ni foam (NF), porous -Al2O3, NiFe
various factors including the feed ratio of the reactant components, preparation process, condition control,
and characterization method have been found to be significantly regulated the morphologies and
electronic structures of the resulting electrocatalysts. In particular, the cooperated effects from different
components, such as mixed metallic species, structurally related organic ligand as well as the nanomaterials
and the substrate, can greatly improve the electrocatalytic performances by modulating the morphological
and electronic structures, which then further enhance the electrocatalytic activity and durability through the
optimized absorption energy towards the active species.[18 25] For example, a bimetallic MOF with mixed
terephthalate and 2-aminoterephthalate ligands directly immobilizated on the NF has exhibited enhanced
Accepted Manuscript
OER performance than the single ligand-derived counterpart resulting from the cooperated electronic
interaction between the two organic linkers with different electron-donating group.[18] The bimetallic
have exhibited positive coupling effects between Ni and Fe metal ions as well as between the MOF and NF,
achieving ultralow over-potentials of 240 mV at current density of 10 mA cm − 2 for the OER and a minor
chronopotentiometric decay of 7.8% at 500 mA cm −2 after 30 hour.[21] Herein, to systematically search the
most suitable electronic interaction from different low-cost metals during the OER process, NiFe-BDC
(BDC= 1,4-bezenedicarboxylate) nanosheet array with different feed ratios of Fe(III) and Ni(II) salts were
uniformly anchored on the NF through the facile solvothermal method, and utilized directly as OER
electrocatalysts for the structure-activity correlations establishment. The feed ratio of the active Fe(III)
and Ni(II) components has significantly modulated the morphological and electronic structures, leading to
feed ratio-dependent volcano-type oxygen evolution activity. The optimal Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC/NF requires a
low overpotential of 220 mV to drive a large current density of 50 mA·cm 2, a Tafel slope of 44.8
mV·dec 1 and durable stability for at least 20 hour in 1.0 M KOH electrolyte. The good activity of
Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC/NF is attributed significantly to the highly ordered nanosheet array and favorable
electronic structure, which is originated from the catalyst-substrate interaction and the favorable charge
125 °C by varying the feed ratios of cheap inorganic Fe(III) and Ni(II) salts. The NF in the present system
serves as both substrate and Ni source, which can also observed in the transition metal-based nanomaterials
Accepted Manuscript
systems with NF as substrate.[26, 27] Thus, the atomic content for Ni(II) in the resultant product is roughly
higher with the feed ratio (Table S1). The different colors of the deposits covered on the NF confirm the
successful preparation of the target samples, and the increased Ni(II) content has induced the dark brown
product to pale green in appearance (Figure S1). In the FT-IR spectra, the asymmetric and symmetric
stretching vibrations for the deprotonated carboxylate group are observed at 1581 4 and 1381 5 cm 1
Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns of these FexNi1x-BDC/NF are feed ratio-independent (Figure
1), suggesting their isomorphic crystalline phase. All these samples show characteristic peaks at 8.9°, 14.2˚,
_
15.9˚ and 17.9˚, corresponding respectively to (200), (001), (20 1 ) and (400) crystal facets of monoclinic
Ni-BDC MOF.[28] A strong peak at 44.5° is assigned to the metallic Ni (JCPDS no. 65-2865) from the NF
substrate.[29] Notably, the intensity of the main peaks decreases with the increased feed ratio of Ni(II) and
Fe(III) ion, suggesting possibly the changed crystallinity by the hybrid of binary metals with slightly
different ionic radius. Notably, compared with the reported nanoployhedra with the same chemical
compositions,[24] the FexNi1 x-BDC/NF samples own better crystallinity probably resulting from the
Morphological Characterizations
The morphology of these FexNi1x-BDC/NF samples was identified by scan electron spectroscopy (SEM)
to unravel the influence of the co-coordination of Fe(III) and Ni(II) ions with 1,4-bezenedicarboxylate. As
shown in Figure 2, uniform nanosheet arrays are tightly and firmly anchored on the surface of the NF. The
thickness of the nanosheets becomes thinner and thinner with the increasing feed ratio of Ni(II) and Fe(III).
Accepted Manuscript
Figure 3a, the nanosheets of the Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC are solid and have smooth surface. The high-resolution
TEM (HR-TEM) image shows a d-space lattice of 0.99 nm, corresponding to (2 0 0) facet of Ni-BDC
(Figure 3b). Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) result of Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC shows highly ordered
diffraction spots (Figure 3b inset), indicating the relatively high crystallization. STEM-EDS elemental
mappings show the uniform distribution of Fe, Ni, C and O elements (Figure 3c), in which the higher
atomic percentage of both O and C indicates the presence of BDC ligand (Table S1). Moreover, the metal
contents in the Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC/NF sample determined by XPS, STEM-EDS, and SEM-EDS are roughly
consistent (Ni:Fe= 7.81: 6.34, 6.06:3.54, and 2.97:2.12), and their slight difference is resulting from the
different selected surface areas of the nanosheet array. All these observations clearly indicate the successful
preparation of NF-supported heterometallic MOF nanosheet arrays via solvothermal treatment. Previously
reported nanomaterials with the same chemical compositions have owned various morphology including
fabrication conditions,[10, 14, 28] which are highly important for the electrocatalytic performances.
Electronic Structure
Chemical environments and oxidation states of each element in Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC/NF were explored by
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), together with Ni-BDC/NF and Fe-BDC/NF for comparison. The
full spectrum demonstrates the co-existence of Ni, Fe, C and O elements (Figure S3). The C 1s spectrum
involves three binding energies (BEs) at 285.1 eV, 286.6 eV and 289.1 eV (Figure S2). The latter two BEs
should be assigned to the arylcarbon from the phenyl ring (C=C) and the carboxylate carbon of OC=O.[14]
High-resolution O 1s region contains three peaks at 531.5 eV, 532.7 eV and 534.0 eV (Figure S2),
corresponding respectively to Fe O and Ni O, O C=O bonds and absorbed water molecule.[14, 22]
As
shown in Figure 4a, the high-resolution Fe 2p region includes two main peaks at 713.4 eV and 726.7 eV for
Accepted Manuscript
the Fe 2p3/2 and Fe 2p1/2, showing the existence of Fe(III) species. Moreover, as compared with
Fe-BDC/NF, the Fe 2p region of Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC/NF red shifts about 0.5 eV, indicating an increased
electron density around Fe(III) centers by co-coordination.[14] The Ni 2p spectrum is deconvoluted into
three pairs of peaks (Figure 4b). The binding energies at 877.0 eV (2p1/2) and 858.9 eV (2p3/2) are attributed
to the NiO bond resulting from the coordination of Ni(II) ion with 1,4-bezenedicarboxylate ligand. Two
peaks at 879.0 eV (2p1/2) and 860.3 eV (2p3/2) were designated as NiOH bond between the Ni(II) ion and
the hydroxyl group. The binding energies at approximately 864.6 eV (2p3/2) and 882.9 eV (2p1/2) are
Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC/NF shift towards a higher binding energy, indicating that the electron density of Ni(II)
decreases. A further charge analysis based on the Bader method quantitatively indicates that the charge of
the FexNi1x-BDC sample decreases from 8.78 |e| for Ni-BDC to 6.55 |e| for Fe0.875Ni0.125-BDC.[31] With the
further increased Fe amount, the charge increases slightly (Figure S4). Thus, the partial substitution of
active Ni(II) by Fe(III) species has significantly adjusted the electronic structure of the resultant
nanomaterials, which is highly important for the manipulations of the electrocatalytic activity.[32]
OER Performance
The OER performances of FexNi1x-BDC/NF electrodes were tested by a standard three-electrode cell in
1.0 M KOH electrolyte at room temperature. Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves were recorded at a
scan rate of 5.0 mV s 1 with 90% automatic ohmic compensation. As shown in Figure 5a, the anodized
peak that located at about 1.35 V should be assigned to the oxidation of Ni0 to Ni2+ from the NF substrate,
and the one at higher potential is from the transformation of Ni2+ to Ni3+. These oxidation processes mean
the formation of high valence metal species, which can behave as substantially active sites during the OER
process. Herein, to avoid the interference of the oxidation peaks, the overpotential to drive a current density
Accepted Manuscript
50 mA·cm2 (50) is chosen to compare the electrocatalytic activity. The 50 value is 220 mV, 250 mV, 260
Fe0.3Ni0.7-BDC/NF and Fe0.11Ni0.89-BDC/NF, respectively. These data indicate that the OER activities of
these bimetallic MOFs are highly feed ratio-dependent (Figure 5b). Apparently, Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC/NF has
endowed the best OER performance among the five bimetallic electrocatalysts. By contrast, monometallic
Ni-BDC/NF ( 50 = 440 mV) shows much inferior OER performance than that of Fe-BDC/NF ( 50 = 330
mV), suggesting that the better activity of Fe-BDC/NF than Ni-BDC/NF. Thus, the Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC/NF
electrocatalyst with two electrocatalytic metals have exhibited cooperate effect on the enhancement of the
OER activity. The electrocatalytic activity of the optimized Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC/NF are comparable with
diverse NiFe-based MOF nanomaterials with different substrates (NF and NiFe alloy foam), organic
nanosheet with different thickness, Table S2). Also, the optimized Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC/NF is much better than
the self-supported NiCo- NiCu-, FeCo-, and FeCoNi-derived MOF electrocatalysts (Table S2).[32]
Tafel slopes of these electrocatalysts were further calculated to deep understand the kinetics of the OER
process. The optimized Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC/NF has a Tafel slope of 44.8 mV·dec1, dramatically decreased by
65.4 mV·dec 1 and 126.29 mV·dec 1 than those of Fe-BDC/NF and Ni-BDC/NF (Figure 5c). The greatly
decreased Tafel slope highlights the significant roles of the mixed metals on the kinetics of the OER
process, suggesting that the OER activity over Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC/NF is kinetically favored. Other four
FexNi1x-BDC/NF samples have owned different Tafel slopes (47.7 mV·dec1 ~ 167.4 mV·dec1, Figure 5c),
implying that the ratio of the two metal components have important roles for the kinetics of the OER.
To gain more insights into the factors governing the high OER performance, the double layer
Accepted Manuscript
capacitance (Cdl) and the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of the seven FexNi1 x-BDC/NF
materials were also measured and compared. As shown in Figure 5d, the calculated Cdl of
Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC/NF is 4.42 mF·cm 2, only slightly bigger by 0.19 mF·cm 2~1.57 mF·cm 2 than those of
the Fe-BDC/NF (3.88 mF·cm 2), Fe0.7Ni0.3-BDC/NF (4.23 mF·cm 2), Fe0.5Ni0.5-BDC/NF (3.89 mF·cm 2),
Fe0.3Ni0.7-BDC/NF (3.79 mF·cm 2), Fe0.11Ni0.89-BDC/NF (3.66 mF·cm 2) and Ni-BDC/NF (2.85 mF·cm 2),
respectively. These Cdl parameter is proportional to the electrochemical surface areas (ECSA) of the
electrocatalyst. Apparently, the largest Cdl value means that Fe0.89Ni0.11-MOF/NF had a larger active surface
area and more exposed active sites. For EIS test, the Fe0.89Ni0.11-MOF/NF presents the smallest semicircle
in the Nyquist diagrams of these samples (Figure 5e), indicating the lowest charge-transfer resistance at the
interface between the electrocatalysts and electrolyte for comparing the charge transfer resistance. The
array and optimized electronic structures, which significantly quicken the reaction kinetics.[29]
chronoamperometry and cyclic voltammetry techniques. As illustrated in Figure 5f, the current density of
Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC/NF at a constant potential of 1.5 V (versus RHE) has displayed negligible decrease over
20 h stability evaluation. The polarization curve after 3000 cycles of CV scans is overlapped well with the
pristine one. Moreover, the sample maintains both the nanosheet array morphology and the pristine phase
structure after the stability test (Figure S5 and S6). These findings suggest that the active
Conclusions
A series of heterometallic NiFe-BDC electrodes were in situ immobilized on the nickel foam through
facile solvothermal method, and used directly as OER electrocatalysts for the structure-activity correlations
Accepted Manuscript
establishment. The feed ratio of the active Fe(III) and Ni(II) components has significantly modulated the
morphological and electronic structures, leading to feed ratio-dependent volcano-type oxygen evolution
activity. The optimized Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC/NF nanosheet arrays have exhibited the best OER performance in
1.0 M KOH electrolyte with a lower overpotential of 220 mV to drive a current density of 50 mA·cm 2, a
dramatically small Tafel slope of 44.8 mV·dec 1 and durable stability over 20 hour. The excellent OER
performance of the nanosheet array is due significantly to the synergistic effect from two active metals on
both the morphological and electronic structure, which quickens essentially the reaction kinetics.
Experimental Section
Chemicals and Materials: Nickel foam (NF), ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O, 99%), nickel
formamide (DMF) and ethanol (C2H5OH) were purchased from Tianjin Chemical Reagent Factory. All the
initial chemical reagents were of analytical grade and used without further purification. Deionized water
(DIW) purified by a Millipore system was used during the whole experiments.
Treatment of NF: A piece of NF (3.0 cm × 4.0 cm × 0.1 cm) was respectively sonicated in 2 M HCl,
ethanol and DIW for 30 min to remove the surface oxides and organic contaminants. The cleaned NF was
10
following procedures. A mixture containing FeCl3·6H2O (0.89 mmol, 0.1427 g), Ni(NO3)2·6H2O (0.11
mmol, 0.0349 g) and H2BDC (1.0 mmol, 0.166 g) was dissolved in a mixture of DMF-ethanol-H2O (35.0
mL, vDMF: vethanol: vwater= 12:1:1) with constant stirring for 15 min. The resultant clear solution was
transferred into a 50.0 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave, together with the well pre-treated NF. The
Accepted Manuscript
autoclave was kept at 125 °C for 12 h and cooled down to room temperature naturally. The NF covered
with dark brown depositor (Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC/NF) was taken out, washed with DIW and ethanol for several
times, and finally dried at 60 °C for 3 h. The mass loading of Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC/NF is 2.6 mg·cm 2. Other
hybrid FexNi1x-BDC/NF samples were respectively prepared according to the same procedures by varying
the feed ratios of FeCl3·6H2O and Ni(NO3)2·6H2O, in which the total molar number of the two metal salts
was 1.0 mmol. The feed ratios were nFe :nNi = 1:0 for Fe-BDC/NF, nFe :nNi = 0.7:0.3 for Fe0.7Ni0.3-BDC/NF,
nFe :nNi = 0.5:0.5 for Fe0.5Ni0.5-BDC/NF, nFe :nNi = 0.3:0.7 for Fe0.3Ni0.7-MOF/NF, nFe :nNi = 0.11:0.89 for
Fe0.11Ni0.89-BDC/NF, as well as nFe :nNi = 0:1 for Ni-BDC/NF. The mass loadings for these samples are 1.2
Materials Characterizations: Fourier transform (FT) IR spectra (KBr pellets) were taken on an
Avatar-370 (Nicolet) spectrometer in the range 4000 400 cm−1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were
radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). The morphology of the samples were observed by a field emission scanning
electron microscopy (FE-SEM, Nova Nano 230, FEI) with an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. Transmission
electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution transmission microscopy (HR-TEM), selected area electron
11
(HAADF-STEM) and TEM energy-dispersive X-ray spectra (TEM-EDX) test were performed on FEI
Talos F200X and G2 F20 transmission electron microscopy with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. X-ray
photoelectron spectra (XPS) were obtained using AXIS ULTRADLD X-ray photoelectron spectrometer
Accepted Manuscript
working station (CHI 660E, Shanghai) in a standard three-electrode system. As-prepared catalyst was
employed as working electrode, a graphite rod (CHI Inc. China) and Ag/AgCl (KCl saturated) were
respectively used as counter electrode and reference electrode in 1.0 M KOH solution (pH = 13.8). Before
electrochemical characterizations, cyclic voltammogram (CV) measurements were carried out for at least
20 cycles at a scan rate of 100 mV·s 1 to activate and stabilize the working electrode. The OER catalytic
activity was investigated using linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) at a scan rate of 5.0 mV s1 in N2-saturated
1.0 M KOH solution with 90% iR-compensation. The Tafel slope was calculated from the Tafel equation: ƞ
= blog j+a, where η is the overpotential (mV), j is the current density (mA∙cm-2), a is the constant and b is
the Tafel slope. The double layer capacitance was measured by cyclic voltammetry (CV) in the
non-faradaic region of the voltammogram (0.91-1.10 V, 0.96 V) at different scan rates of 40, 60, 80, 100,
120, 140, 160 and 180 mV·s1. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was measured at 1.56 V (vs.
RHE) over the frequency range from 100 kHz to 0.1 Hz with an AC perturbation of 5.0 mV. The durability
test of the electrocatalyst was carried out using the potentiostatic electrolysis at a fixed potential of 1.5 V
without iR-correction. All the potentials reported herein were calibrated with respect to the reversible
hydrogen electrode (RHE) using the following Nernst equation ERHE= EAg/AgCl + 0.197 + 0.059 × pH unless
stated otherwise. The overpotential () was calculated using the formula, (V) = E (RHE) 1.23 V.
Acknowledgments
12
Financial supports were from the NSFC (Grants 21671149, 21571140 and 21531005), the 973 Program
(2014CB845601) and the Program for Innovative Research Team in University of Tianjin (TD13 5074),
Conflicts of interest
Accepted Manuscript
Keywords: oxygen evolution reaction metal-organic frameworks electrocatalyst nanosheet
arrayelectrocatalytic activity
References
[1] M. G, Schultz, T. Diehl, G. P, Brasseur, W. Zittel, Science 2003, 302, 624627.
[4] S. Liu, Z. Wang, S. Zhou, F. Yu, M. Yu, C. Y. Chiang, W. Zhou, J. Zhao, J. Qiu, Adv. Mater. 2017, 29,
1700874.
[5] T. N. Huan, G. Rousse, S. Zanna, I. T. Lucas, X. Xu, N. Menguy, V. Mougel, M. Fontecave, Angew.
[7] L. Jiao, Y. Wang, H.-L. Jiang, Q. X, Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1703663.
[9] H. Wang, F. Yin, G. Li, B. Chen, Z. Wang, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 1617916186.
[10] K. Rui, G. Zhao, Y. Chen, Y. Lin, Q. Zhou, J. Chen, J. Zhu, W. Sun, W. Huang, S. X. Dou, Adv. Funct.
[11] W. Zhou, D.-D. Huang, Y.-P. Wu, J. Zhao, T. Wu, J. Zhang, D.-S. Li, C. Sun, P. Feng, X. Bu, Angew.
[12] S. Zhao, Y. Wang, J. Dong, C.-T. He, H. Yin, P. An, K. Zhao, X. Zhang, C. Gao, L. Zhang, J. Lv, J.
Wang, J. Zhang, A. M. Khattak, N. A. Khan, Z. Wei, J. Zhang, S. Liu, H. Zhao, Z. Tang, Nat. Energy
2016, 1, 16184.
[14] X. Zhang, Q. Liu, X. Shi, A. M. Asiri, X. Sun, Inorg. Chem. Front. 2018, 5, 14051408.
13
[15] C. Cao, D. D. Ma, Q. Xu, X. T. Wu, Q. L. Zhu, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 29, 1807418.
[16] G. Cai, W. Zhang, L. Jiao, S.-H. Yu, H.-L. Jiang, Chem. 2017, 2, 791802.
[17] L. Yang, G. Zhu, H. Wen, X. Guan, X. Sun, H. Feng, W. Tian, D. Zheng, X. Cheng, Y. Yao, J. Mater.
[18] Z. Xue, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, W. Geng, B. Jia, J. Tang, S. Bao, H.-P. Wang, Y. Fan, Z.-W. Wei, Z. Zhang, Z.
[19] F.-L. Li, Q. Shao, X. Huang, J.-P. Lang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 18881892.
Accepted Manuscript
[20] X. Zhao, P. Pachfule, S. Li, J. R. J. Simke, J. Schmidt, A. Thomas, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57,
89218926.
[21] D. Senthil Raja, X.-F. Chuah, S.-Y. Lu, Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1801065.
[22] Y. Hao, Q. Liu, Y. Zhou, Z. Yuan, Y. Fan, Z. Ke, C. Y. Su, G. Li, Energy Environ. Mater. 2019, 2,
1821.
[23] Y. Li, M. Lu, P. He, Y. Wu, J. Wang, D. Chen, H. Xu, J. Gao, J. Yao, Chem. Asian J. 2019, 14,
15901594.
[24] J. Li, W. Huang, M. Wang, S. Xi, J. Meng, K. Zhao, J. Jin, W. Xu, Z. Wang, X. Liu, Q. Chen, L. Xu, X.
Liao, Y. Jiang, K. A. Owusu, B. Jiang, C. Chen, D. Fan, L. Zhou, L. Mai, ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 4,
285292.
[25] X. Zhao, Z. Xue, W. Chen, X. Bai, R. Shi, T. Mu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 2638–26242.
[26] C. Zhou, J. Mu, Y.-F. Qi, Q. Wang, X.-J. Zhao, E.-C. Yang, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44,
81568165.
[27] Y.-F. Qi, Q. Wang, X.-G. Wang, Z.-Y. Liu, X.-J. Zhao, E.-C. Yang, Nanoscale 2019, 11, 10595 –
10602.
[28] Q. Liu, L. Xie, X. Shi, G. Du, A. M. Asiri, Y. Luo, X. Sun, Inorg. Chem. Front. 2018, 5, 15701574.
[30] F. Sun, G. Wang, Y. Ding, C. Wang, B. Yuan, Y. Lin, Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1800584.
[31] G. Henkelman, A. Arnaldsson, H. Jynsson, Comput. Mater. Sci. 2006, 36, 354−360.
[32] J. Xing, K. Guo, Z. Zou, M. Cai, J. Du, C. Xu, Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 70467049.
14
Figure captions
Figure 2. SEM images for FexNi1x-BDC/NF with x = 1 (a), x = 0.89 (b), x = 0.7 (c), x = 0.5 (d), x = 0.3 (e)
x = 0.11 (f), and x = 0 (g).
Figure 3. (a) TEM image, (b) HR-TEM image and SAED pattern, (c) HAADF-STEM image and
corresponding EDS elemental mappings for Fe, Ni, O and C elements in Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC/NF.
Figure 5. Electrocatalytic OER performance and stability over FexNi1 x-BDC/NF in 1.0 M KOH solution:
Accepted Manuscript
(a) LSV curves, (b) overpotentials at 50 mA·cm 2 for FexNi1x-BDC/NF, (c) Tafel plots, (d) Plots
of current density versus scan rate, (e) EIS Nyquist plots, and (f) LSV curves for
Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC/NF before and after 20 h durability test (Inset: i-t curve for Fe0.89Ni0.11-BDC/NF
at an overpotential of 1.5 V).
15
Accepted Manuscript
Figure 1.
16
Accepted Manuscript
Figure 2.
17
Accepted Manuscript
Figure 3.
18
Accepted Manuscript
(a) (b)
Figure 4.
19
Accepted Manuscript
Figure 5.
20
Graphic Abstract
Rui-Jie Li, Yu-Feng Qi, Qian Wang, Jia-Jun Wang, Zheng-Yu Liu, Xiu-Guang Wang, Xiao-Jun Zhao, and
En-Cui Yang
Accepted Manuscript
Feed ratio of Fe(III) and Ni (II) salts has significantly dominated the morphological and electronic
structures of the nanosheet arrays grown in-situ on the nickel foam, leading to feed ratio-dependent
21