SIP Part I 2
SIP Part I 2
Chapter 2
School’s Current Situation
A. Introducing the School
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
Source: School-EBEIS
MALE FEMALE TOTAL
This graph shows that there is a significant fluctuation of the enrollment for four
consecutive years. it reveals that there is a decrease of enrollment from SY 2018-
2019 to SY 2020-2021, there are greater in number of male than the female.
Then, in the following year, SY 2021-2022 ,it decrease in number with female
enrollment.
[Link] DATA
Figure 2 : Comparative data of 5-year –11 old children for four consecutive years.
110
105
100
95
90
85
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
Source: Community Survey
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
REPETITION RATE
Figure 3: Comparative of Repetition rate for four consecutive years.
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022
The figure shows that the repetition rate in year 2019 up to present maintained
to (0) zero percent.
Simple Droup-out Rate
Figure 4: Comparative of Simple Dropout Rate
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022
This figure displays the simple droup-out rate of learners for SY:2019 up to
2023 which is maintained to (0) zero percent.
Retention Rate
Figure 5: Comparative Data of Retention Rate for four consecutive years.
100.00%
0.9726
95.00%
90.00% 0.886
84.96% 0.8508
85.00%
80.00%
75.00%
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022
100.00% 1 1 1
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022
Interpretation
Importance
Magnitude
Feasibility
Strategic
Urgency
Average
Total
IMPROVEMENT
AREAS
Organized communication
and coordination system
Inactive stakeholders, less with the stakeholders.
involvement of stakeholders in
school activities Strengthen community
Inconsistent of information linkages.
dissemination Involve them in different
PROJ
school activities and
programs.
Conduct Recognition and
Awards
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022
Figure 8: Data of the teachers attended the training for special education
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0 0
0
TEACHER S WIT SPECIAL EDUCATION TRAINING TEACHER S WITHOUT SPECIAL EDUCATION TRAINING
Prime Concern
The aid in helping the learners with disabilities
that capture in the recorded EBIES. This aims to
support our disabilities children for them as part
in inclusive education.
Training is our tool to captivate our learners in the status
disadvantage in situation. This provide for helping them reach in
their absenteeism stop.
0
F ully R efresher Moderately R efresher Light R efresher Grade R eady
10
0
Fully Refresher Moderately Refresher Light Refresher Grade Ready
The
2 figure shows the result of the comprehensive rapid literacy assessment in SY
2022-2023
1 with the (13) thirteen learners for grade ready in English.
0
Grade 3Fully Refresher Moderately refresher Light Refresher Grade Ready
Grade 3
0
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
This figure shows the significant increasing of independent level from SY:2018-
2019 to SY:2022-2023.
Figure 12: Data of reading level in English for Grade 4
12
10
2
NO DATA
0
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
Grade 5
Figure 13: Data of reading level in Filipino in Grade five.
12
10
0
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
This figure shows that the highest in number for reading level is independent.
Figure 14: Data of reading level in English in grade five.
12
10
0
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
This figure shows the highest in number for reading level is independent readers.
Grade 6
Figure 15: Data of reading level in English for Grade 6
12
10
This figure shows the increase in number for reading level is independent
0
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
readers.
NON READER FRUSTRATION INSTRUCTIONAL INDEPENDENT
This figure shows the the highest in number for reading level is independent in
English.
2. Numeracy Proficiencies/Competencies
Figure 17: Comparative data of numeracy level in grade one for consecutive years.
16
14
12
10
0
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
14
12
10
0
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
18
16
14
12
10
0
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
KEY STAGE 1: GRADE 4 –GRADE 6
NON NUMERATES MODERATE HIGHLY NUMERATES
Figure 17: Comparative data of numeracy level in grade four for consecutive years.
14
12
10
0
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
This figure shows there is increasing of moderate and highly numerates level in SY
2018-2019 to 2022-2023.
Figure 18: Comparative data of numeracy level in grade five for consecutive years.
16
14
12
10
0
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
14
12
10
0
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
This figure shows there is increasing of both moderate and highly numerates in
SY 2018-2019 to 2022-2023.
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
.
..
E
H
O
H
H
P
L
IS
IN
E
N
T
S
-M
P
A
E
L
IP
A
M
G
P
B
M
N
G
T
E
M
SOURCE: PROMED
IN
L
A
R
A
The figure shows that there is low MPS in ENGLISH with an average of 78.68%
in four years, with this the ESP is the highest MPS with an average of 84.68% for
four consecutive years.
Figure 18: Comparative data of means percentage score of grade two.
88
86
84
82
80
78
74
72
SOURCE: PROMED
The figure shows that there is low MPS in MATH with an average of 81.25%in four
years, with this the FILIPINO is the highest MPS with an average of 81.76% for four
consecutive year.
Figure 18: Comparative data of means percentage score of grades three.
86
84
82
80
78
76
74
72
MTB-MLE FILIPINO ENGLISH MATH SCIENCE [Link]. MAPEH ESP
84
82
80
78
76
74
72
FILIPINO ENGLISH MATH SCIENCE [Link]. EPP MAPEH ESP
Source: PROMEDS
The figure shows the four (4) comparative data of the average test result that
there is high MPS in MAPEH with the average of 81.96% in four consecutive years.
Figure 18: Comparative data of means percentage score of grade five.
86
84
82
80
78
76
74
72
PP
SP
H
H
O
...
SH
E
AT
E
N
E
AL
LI
AP
PI
IE
G
LI
AR
M
N
SC
FI
Source: PROMEDS
E
The figure shows the four (4) comparative data of the average test result that
there is low MPS in SCIENCE with 78.82%, while ARALING PANLIPUNAN is the
highest MPS with 82.05% in the four consecutive years.
Figure 18: Comparative data of means percentage score of grade five.
88
86
84
82
80
78
76
74
72
FILIPINO ENGLISH MATH SCIENCE [Link]. EPP MAPEH ESP
Source: PROMEDS
The figure shows the four (4) comparative data of the average test result that
there is low MPS in FILIPINO, ENGLISH and SCIENCE in four consecutive years.
Incidence of Bullying
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3 NO DATA
0.2
0.1
0
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
Source: PROMEDS
The data presents that there was zero case incidence of bullying recrded in
four consecutive years. This result was achieved through the strong campaign of
School Project (Project SAFER and Project Kite) throughout the school prmises with
the help of teachers and school head.
2. Protect learners and personnel from injury, and harm brought by natural hazards
Figure 20: Percentage of learners participated in earthquake drill and fire drill.
2.5
1.5
0.5
0
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
The figure presents the constant of learner’s participation in earthquake drill and
fire drill for five consecutive years
[Link] status
The comprehensive nutritional status is a vital part of the health education a
program of the school as the current situation in NORMAL STATUS keeps
increasing as the present stratum.
Figure 20: Comparative data of weight in four consecutive years.
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
The figure reveals that there is a significant increase on the number of learners in the BMI
index in normal weight for SY2018- 2019 to 2022-2023 in (5) five consecutive years .
100
80
60
40
20
0
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
The figure reveals that there is significant increase on number of learners in the BMI index
in normal in height for SY2018- 2019 to 2022-2023 in 5 (five) consecutive years .
0
HAND WAS HING LAVATOR Y WATER TANK
This data shows the number of facilities in the requirement of WinS in school.
1.5
0.5
This data shows the ratio of the functional toilet-bowl computed to the
0
F U N CTION AL TOILET G EN DER - B AS ED COMF OR T
R OOM
total enrollees against to the functional toilet bowl is 1:42 for the school.
5. All learners percentage supervised daily group activity in hand washing
with soap and tooth brushing with fluoride
Figure 24: Comparative data of group activity of hand washing and tooth brushing
61%
60%
59%
58%
57%
56%
55%
54%
53%
52%
2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
The figure presents the significant increase of learners participation in hand
GROUP ACTIVITY IN HAND WASHING GROUP ACTIVITY IN TOOTH BRUSHING
This scenario in the school is the most vital goal in the well-being aspect
that the school encountered. The school provides safe drinking water,
improve access to and maintenance of clean gender-friendly and inclusive
sanitation facilities and promotes hygienic behavior and life long good
health. It enhances the well-being of the children and their family that
contributes towards healthy and secure school environments that can
protect from illness, abuse and exclusion.
F. Enabling Mechanism: Governance and Management
Textbook 1,470
2.5
1.5
0.5
0
2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
The figure shows the promotion of Teacher III is higher which is (1) one for school
year 2019-2020 and additionl promotion of (2) two in school year 2021-2022 with
a total of (3) three and (2) two newly hired teachers in the year 2021-2022.
4. Numbers of teachers’ rating in their Individual Performance Commitment
IPCRF rating.
Figure 27: Number of teachers rating in IPCRF.
4.5
3.5
2.5
1.5
0.5
The figure is the individual performance rating of the teachers in four years
0
2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 2 LEVEL 2
LEVEL 1
Year 6
- : 2021-2022 Improvement of School Transparency Wall,
construction of one makeshift with two classroom
Year 5 2019-2020
Construction of school head office and stage
Year 4 2018-2019
and Development for Teachers
Year 3 2017-2018
Additional Hand-washing Facility
2016-2017
Year 2
Additional Gendered CR
2015-2016
Year 1
Enhancement of School Pergola
Procure Mini Sound System
The
The following priorities shall be considered in the deployment of the need items
base from the color spectrum code to be deploy each year with hierarchy
artifact.