Learning Journal 4
Learning Journal 4
Copyright © UNITAR, United Nations Institute for Training and Research, 2016,
on behalf of PAGE.
This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit
purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the
source is made. The PAGE Secretariat would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that
uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other
commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the PAGE Secretariat.
Course authors:
Giuliano Montanari, Maya Valcheva, Amrei Horstbrink (UNITAR); Philip Gass (IISD)
Contributors:
Jason Dion (IISD); Sirini Withana (UN Environment); Sarwat Chowdhury, Massimiliano Riva
(UNDP).
Creative Concept:
Arturo Rago (UNITAR)
Graphic Design:
Pilar Lagos (UNITAR)
Photo credits
Unless stated otherwise, the photos used in the journal are under a Creative Commons license.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
introduction 5
OVERVIEW 6
OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR GREENING THE ENERGY SECTOR 6
EXAMPLES OF SECTOR-SPECIFIC INITIATIVES 9
OVERVIEW 14
OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR GREENING TRANSPORTATION 15
EXAMPLES OF SECTOR-SPECIFIC INITIATIVES 17
3 waste reduction 22
OVERVIEW 22
OPPORTUNITIES, AND CHALLENGES FOR MANAGING POLLUTION AND WASTE 23
EXAMPLES OF MEASURES RELATED TO SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION 25
4 Natural resources 28
OVERVIEW 28
BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES RELATED TO NATURAL RESOURCES 29
EXAMPLES OF NATURAL RESOURCE-RELATED INITIATIVES 30
6 References 36
ABBREVIATIONS 39
4
5
Introduction
Previous modules looked at some of the For example, fiscal reform in the transport
tools available to policymakers to undertake sector (Lesson 2) can reduce use of
fiscal reform (Module 2), as well as the policy fossil fuel-based road transportation, or
development and implementation process incentivize the purchase of cleaner vehicles.
for effective fiscal reform (Module 3). This Investments in public transportation can
module focusses on applying these lessons promote social inclusion and economic
to specific sectors and providing examples of competitiveness by improving the
fiscal reform implemented around the world. affordability and effectiveness of public
The four thematic areas reviewed in this transport.
Module are energy (and by extension After completing the module, participants
industrial development), transportation, will be able to:
waste reduction, and natural resource • List key economic sectors with
management. These themes have been significant potential benefits from fiscal
selected on the basis of: measures
• The significant potential for advancing • Distinguish specific sectoral challenges
sustainable, economic and social and opportunities
development by greening those sectors. • Indicate sectoral options and tools for
• The diverse array of fiscal measures fiscal intervention
that are suitable for application in these • Provide examples of successful green
thematic areas. fiscal initiatives in the discussed
economic sectors.
6
OVERVIEW
The energy sector poses particular challenges At the same time, expanding access to energy
in the context of a green economy due to its is a central challenge for developing countries.
size and potential transformational effects for The scale of the challenge is massive with
the development of other economic sectors. 1.3 billion people currently lacking access
The global system is highly dependent on to electricity, and 2.6 billion depending on
fossil fuels (accounting for 84% of GHG traditional biomass for cooking (IEA 2013).
emissions in 2009).
The need to reduce GHG emissions and
Electricity and heat production account combat climate change, ensure energy
for roughly 35 percent of global GHG security and access to electricity, as well as
emissions and are driving factors of climate reduce pollution and public-health hazards
change (IPCC 2014). There are numerous make the energy sector a primary target
other environmental and social challenges for green fiscal reform. Section 1.2 covers
associated with fossil fuel-based energy, opportunities and challenges for reforming
including impacts on fresh water resources the sector, while section 1.3 provides concrete
(McDiarmid 2013) and air quality (The examples of applying fiscal policies for
Economist 2013). greening energy use.
Energy Efficiency
Improvements in energy efficiency alone have in fossil fuel pricing. In addition, public funds
the potential to reduce, in a very cost-efficient can be invested in technology and policies that
way, up to 57% of global CO2 emissions until reduce emissions.
2030 (IEA 2009). In addition, investment • Enabling access to renewable/clean energy:
in energy efficiency is extremely attractive as Green fiscal reforms can level the playing
the costs are mostly recovered, due to energy field between fossil and clean energy sources
savings and improved productivity. For example, through a process of subsidizing non-polluting
a switch from an incandescent bulb to energy- energy sources and introducing economic
saving light bulb provides an opportunity to divide dis-incentives for fossil fuel energy sources.
the electricity consumption by a factor of four Advancing clean energy offers substantive
without any compromise in the quality of service. opportunities for increasing access to energy
Similar opportunities exist in the areas of heat for a larger number of people.
production, manufacturing, agricultural processes, • Associated environmental and social benefits:
and transportation. Moreover, energy efficiency Burning of coal is a “leading cause of smog,
generally does not have adverse environmental acid rain, and toxic air pollution” and “takes
impacts and can be considered a “low hanging a major toll on public health“ (Union of
fruit” for policy-makers, businessmen, and citizens Concerned Scientists n.d.). Fiscal policies that
alike. aim improvements in air and water quality can
significantly improve public health and reduce
pollution.
Key benefits • Economic benefits: Fiscal policies aiming
to improve energy efficiency can create
In sum, the global community and national significant economic benefits for companies
governments can benefit from green fiscal reform and private consumers to reduce energy use
in the energy sector in the following ways: (U.S. EPA 2015). Moreover, fossil fuel subsidy
• Reducing greenhouse emissions: This can be reform can free up resources which may be
done for example by eliminating fossil fuel reallocated toward other purposes.
subsidies and incorporating environmental and
social externalities (such as carbon emissions)
8
REFLECTION POINT
Is the energy sector in your country particularly pollution intensive? How would polluting
industries likely react to an increase in energy prices?
key challenges
Some of the key challenges associated with Lower segments of the population may
green fiscal reform in the energy sector also have limited ability to adjust to
include: increased energy prices (e.g. by installing
• Political economy: Implementing fiscal better insulation in their homes, limited
mechanisms may require significant access to alternatives). Policymakers
political capital from governments due can take action to mitigate such adverse
to entrenched corporate interests and impacts where necessary through
perceived energy insecurity. A case study targeted compensation measures for
in South Africa shows that efforts to vulnerable groups.
gain support for a carbon tax have been • Impact on industrial competitiveness:
“enormously difficult” for the political Concerns that carbon pricing and
elite (Nakhooda 2014). other fiscal measures may render some
• Impact on low-income families: Fiscal industries uncompetitive compared
reform can result in negative impacts on to similar industries in other countries
low-income families due to direct and should also be considered (Box 1). To
indirect price effects, e.g. if their energy enable the industrial transition and gain
primarily comes from fossil fuel sources. support from companies, governments
Similarly, other goods that depend on can design the reform process in such a
fossil fuel may become more expensive, way to increase support from industry
e.g. transportation services. stakeholders, for example through the use
of targeted compensation measures.
BOX 1:
WHAT IS CARBON LEAKAGE?
Carbon leakage is the situation where “for emissions rise in a country without carbon
reasons of costs related to climate policies, pricing. To address leakages, governments
businesses (…) transfer production to other can make an effort to lower the
countries that have laxer constraints on implications of carbon pricing for industries
GHG emissions.” This essentially means exposed to this type of competition.
that while emissions are reduced in the (European Commission 2016)
state that is subject to carbon pricing,
1 However, industries need not to be opposed by nature, a growing set of leaders are actually calling
for a rapid and universal deployment of carbon pricing.
9
The following examples highlight how fiscal The main goal of a carbon tax is to place an
mechanisms can be used in the energy sector. economic cost on the externalities associated
Some early results in terms of addressing the with the use of the fuel. Secondary goals may
challenges listed above are highlighted. include re-using the revenue raised to fund
additional green measures (e.g. subsidies for
renewable energy)or increasing fiscal space
CARBON TAXES for governments.
A carbon tax, as described in detail in Module As exemplified by Figure 1, carbon taxes
2, places an economic cost on the use of have proven effective in reducing the use
fossil fuels. Often this cost is reflected in its of fossil fuels in the Canadian Province of
most general terms as a per-tonne charge on British Columbia. The carbon tax introduced
emissions for the use of any energy sources in 2008 contributed to a downward trend in
that contribute to GHG emissions. sales of fuels subject to the tax in the province
compared to the rest of the country.
This price can then be translated into a point
of sale charge based on the emissions intensity
of the fuel and the typical unit it is sold by (e.g.
cubic meter of natural gas, tonne of coal, etc.).
0.25
0.05
2000- 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012-
2001- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 2012- 2 0 1 3
Carbon taxes have been introduced in The case study below presents the
a number of developed and developing background, objectives and key
countries including: Chile, Costa Rica, characteristics in the design and
Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Iceland, Japan, implementation of the carbon tax in
Mexico, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, South Mexico.
Africa, Switzerland and United Kingdom.
CASE STUDY 1:
CARBON TAX IN MEXICO
CASE STUDY 2:
RENEWABLE ENERGY FEED IN TARIFFS IN UGANDA
BACKGROUND
In the mid-2000s the Ugandan electricity
system was facing a number of challenges due DESIGN OF INSTRUMENT
to decreased water levels in Lake Victoria which
had reduced hydroelectric output from 230 Part of renewable energy policy is a feed-
MW in 2005 to 138 MW by 2010 (Byakola in tariff (FiT) for small scale renewables.
n.d.). At the same time, demand for electricity This approach was reviewed in 2010 and
was growing. Looking to address this challenge, expanded in 2012. Uganda’s FiT targets
Uganda enacted a Renewable Energy Policy in projects smaller than 20 MW and covers a
2007. number of different technologies including
wind, geothermal, bagasse and hydro. Rates
OBJECTIVES for 2011-2012 ranged roughly between USD
$0.08 and $0.12 per kWh.
The policy’s goal is to increase Uganda’s energy
production by up to 20% from a 600 MW RESULTS AND COMPLEMENTARY
base (Tsagas 2013). Uganda also claims that MEASURES
the program will leverage “more than €300
million of private capital into renewable energy There is some evidence that the FiT
development, fast-tracking a portfolio of up contributed to diversifying and increasing
to 15 small-scale (1 MW-20 MW) projects the energy production. However, more
promoted by private developers” systematic data collection and analysis is
needed to evaluate the overall impact of the
policy reform.
EMISSIONS TRADING
An emissions trading system (ETS) in the If demand for credits exceeds the number
energy sector is a more complex tool than of credits, the price rises to reflect the
carbon taxes or subsidies. Without getting into increased demand. Entities (such as electricity
details on the technical aspects of emissions utilities) may be expected to cover 100% of
trading (this is covered in Module 2), the their emissions through credit purchase or
implication of this type of fiscal reform in the trading, or if they are considered vulnerable
energy sector has some unique characteristics. governments, may lower the amount of
credits that have to be purchased, or allocate
In short, ETS set an emission cap, within which some credits for free.
companies buy and sell allowances/credits,
thereby influencing supply and demand, and For credits purchased at auction, revenues
thus ultimately the price of an allowance. go to the government and can be used for
whatever purpose they see fit.
To guarantee a minimum price – and thus China has been testing an ETS, their specific
a minimal incentive – governments may system is examined in Case Study 3. A map of
determine a price floor for emission credits. their pilot system is provided in Figure 2.
CASE STUDY 3:
CHINESE ETS PILOT PROJECTS
Overview
Like energy, transport emissions represent developing world (Figure 4) there is also
a significant portion of global GHG a concerted effort to use fiscal reform to
emissions, roughly 14 percent (IPCC reduce the number amount of vehicles on
2014). As cities become more congested the road and promote alternative modes of
(Figure 3) and face increasing air pollution transportation.
related to traffic, particularly in the
REFLECTION POINT
If you were looking to implement fiscal reform in the transport sector, what might be the
best selling point to your population? Would it be reducing pollution, reducing congestion,
or is there some other benefit you would promote?
16
REFLECTION POINT
What is the urban/rural split in your country? What are the unique concerns of each
group with respect to transportation?
There are associated challenges with green are shorter. In rural areas often public
fiscal reforms in the transport sector that transport does not exist or is significantly
include: reduced and driving distances are longer.
• Ensuring alternative options to personal Transportation fuel use can also be
transport are available: If the goal is to closely tied to livelihoods, for instance
have people drive less, there needs to getting agricultural products to markets.
be alternate public transport options Ensuring that rural considerations are
in place. Using revenues raised from taken into account is essential.
transport-related fiscal measures • International impacts: Differences in
to invest in public transport could fuel taxes between bordering countries
contribute to the development of these may encourage fuel tourism as motorists
alternative options. travel across borders to re-fuel. Similarly,
• Multi-jurisdictional systems: Transport, national taxes on kerosene or maritime
particularly public transport, is a shared fuels can put a significant burden on
area of responsibility between national industries competing in global markets.
governments and cities. As a result, it These impacts call for concerted
is imperative that cities and national multilateral action to balance out risks
governments work together on the and benefits in an equitable manner.
implementation of fiscal measures
in transport that will require shared
responsibility and enforcement.
• Differing rural/urban dynamics: In urban
centers, public transport options are
usually available and driving distances
17
A congestion charge can be applied in the Any congestion charge system would have
same way that highway tolls are applied. At to be accompanied with enforcement. In
certain entry points to a city center, toll London, enforcement is ensured through a
booths can be set up where users pay the fee system where, if payment is not received,
to enter the city center. Monthly or annual a penalty notice is mailed. If this is not
passes can also be made available that can paid, enforcement agents can be sent to
be scanned (in person or electronically). The collect penalties in person, with the power
London system is more advanced, relying to impound vehicles (Transport for London
on camera systems and electronic payment 2015). Other effective models include
options to reduce interference with traffic Singapore and Stockholm (Case Study 4).
(Transport for London 2015).
CASE STUDY 4:
STOCKHOLM CONGESTION CHARGE
(Eliasson 2014)
19
20
It can be applied progressive, i.e. the population All of these reforms are implemented through
segments with higher income would be charged taxation or subsidies with the basic goal of
more, while the poor might be subsidized raising the price of polluting activities and
(World Bank 2005). lowering the price of non- (or less) polluting
behaviour.
The alternative to this is also to reduce the
price of cleaner fuels, thereby creating the If an environmental fuel tax is to be collected
same incentive to reduce use of polluting fuels. one way is to model the way that other
fuel taxes are collected, rather than setting
There are several ways to adjust fuel pricing. up entirely new administrative systems.
Thailand, for instance, placed a subsidy Subsidies can be provided directly to
on unleaded gasoline of roughly 1.2 USD consumers or producers.
cents per litre to lower the price and make
it a more attractive product against more An associated question is how revenues raised
environmentally harmful leaded gasoline (GIZ through fuel price adjustments are spent.
2013). British Columbia uses this revenue to offset
business and income tax reductions whereas
Alternatively, the British Columbia carbon the City of Oslo uses revenues strictly to
tax places a tax on clear gasoline of 6.67 CAD invest in sector development (e.g. road
cents per litre (Ministry of Finance 2015). infrastructure and public transport).
21
BONUS/MALUS PROGRAMMES
The two aforementioned mechanisms are Such programmes can be implemented
both fiscal mechanisms that focus on vehicle into the purchase price through taxation
use. A bonus/malus programme2 focuses on increases or breaks, or integrated into the
ownership of vehicles. This is put in practice by, registration process for the vehicle after
one the one hand, reducing the cost of vehicles purchase. In the former case, it is a one-time
that are efficient or use clean energy (e.g. interaction, while in the latter case it could
electric vehicles), thereby giving a bonus, and, be integrated into annual vehicle registration
on the other, by raising the cost of ownership fees. A feebate programme introduced in
of vehicles that are fuel-inefficient. Singapore is highlighted in Box 2.
BOX 2:
SINGAPORE CARBON EMISSIONS-BASED VEHICLE SCHEME
There are several examples of feebates which typically have much higher usage
being introduced as one element of green rates, face rebates or surcharges that are
fiscal reform in transportation. Singapore 50 percent higher.
applied the Carbon Emissions-Based
Vehicle Scheme in 2013. Their system The program was recently extended into
is based on grams carbon emission per 2017 with the gram per kilometer rates
kilometer whereby vehicles under 160 g/ made more stringent, thus strengthening
km qualify for rebates of 5.000-30.000 the incentive to choose more efficient
USD while vehicles over 186 g/km pay vehicles.
surcharges of 5.000-30.000 USD. The (GFEI 2015)
rates are for personal vehicles, while taxis,
2 This approach is sometimes referred to as so-called “feebate”. The term is a combination of the words fee
and rebate, pointing towards to the parallel use of bonuses and maluses.
22
Waste Reduction
Fiscal instruments can be applied to reduce waste and overconsumption,
thus fostering sustainable lifestyles and responsible management of valuable
materials.
Overview
Ensuring sustainable consumption and The push for sustainable consumption
production (SCP) is Goal 12 of the emerges from patterns that are currently
Sustainable Development Goals. The 2030 trending in the wrong direction, including
Agenda for Sustainable Development the volume of solid waste being produced
commits countries to: annually, estimated at 11.2 billion tonnes
(UNEP 2011). Projections for growth
fundamental changes in the way that our between 2012 and 2025 are outlined in
societies produce and consume goods Figure 5.
and services. Governments, international
organizations, the business sector and other All of this points to a need for concerted
non-state actors and individuals must contribute waste reduction, avoidance and reuse.
to changing unsustainable consumption and
production patterns, including through the
mobilization, from all sources, of financial and
technical assistance to strengthen developing
countries’ scientific, technological and innovative
capacities to move towards more sustainable
patterns of consumption and production (UN
DESA 2015).
There are some opportunities for green fiscal Environment (Figure 6). It is estimated that
mechanisms to drive positive changes in the the global waste market from collection
sector, all falling within the general waste to recycling is 410 billion USD per year
management hierarchy outlined by UN (UNEP 2011).
Dumping fees, deposit-refund schemes and or other drop-off site. For larger loads, scales
product taxes or charges are three options for can be installed at landfill sights that weigh
green fiscal reform in this area. vehicles or trailers entering and exiting where
the difference in weight of the trailer or
vehicle represents the weight of the waste
DUMPING FEES dumped.
Dumping, landfill or tipping fees are a way For cities or other jurisdictions that manage
of discouraging waste generation by raising consolidated waste pickup services, the
the cost of waste disposal (UNEP 2011). The charge can be placed on the amount of waste
basic principle is that a fee is paid for disposal collected. Box 3 outlines how tipping fees are
for waste. Moreover, fines for deterring illegal administrated in the Philippines.
dumping may also be applied.
A similar scheme is Pay-As-You-Throw
This type of fiscal mechanism can be (PAYT) whereby households are charged for
implemented in a number of ways. For small solid waste collection based on the amount of
volumes of waste disposed at a landfill a flat waste that they throw away.
fee can be charged at the entry of a landfill
BOX 3:
TIPPING FEES IN THE PHILIPPINES
Tipping fees have been implemented in the Philippines were not part of the
successfully in many countries. In the operational budget for the landfill. Malaysia
Philippines example each municipality and Indonesia also charge at specific
charges a basic tax for every load of landfills at the entrance to the landfill, both
incoming waste. at flat fee rates.
DEPOSIT-REFUNDS SCHEMES
Deposit-refund schemes are intended to address The refund may not be equal to the deposit, with the
the end of life of products by developing strategies difference being allocated for handing, recycling, and/
for proper end-waste management and by or disposal of the product.
incentivizing recycling through refund schemes.
European countries have seen very effective return
These schemes require the payment of a deposit rates under these schemes as high as 95 percent or
when purchasing a product (e.g. incorporated more (European Environment Agency 2005). In a
in purchase price) that may contribute to different regional context, Taiwan implemented a fairly
pollution (e.g. aluminum cans or plastic bottles) successful PET deposit-refund scheme (Box 4).
and then receiving a refund of this deposit when
the product is returned for recycling or proper
disposal at pre-determined sites (European
Environment Agency 2005).
BOX 4:
DEPOSIT-REFUND FOR PET IN TAIWAN
REFLECTION POINT
A major issue for successful green fiscal mechanisms for sustainable consumption is
enforcement – can you think of some ways that your country could tackle this issue?
27
PRODUCT TAXES/CHARGES
Like a deposit-refund scheme, product taxes The second purpose is that the revenue from
and charges are placed on items that have the taxes or charges can be used to reduce
potentially harmful impacts. environmental impacts of the products.
A common example of this is placing an The simplest way to implement these types
environmental levy or tax on plastic bags at of mechanisms is as a tax at point of sale, in
grocery stores. In this case the item has a the same manner general sales or value-added
notable environmental harm and in many taxes are implemented.
cases improper disposal is an issue.
Fees collected can go to general budget
These charges serve two purposes, the first revenues or can be earmarked for specific
is to incentivize better alternatives (e.g. by purposes. Ireland implemented a plastic bag
charging a few cents per bag, people are levy (Case Study 5) that has been successful
incentivized to use reusable bags). in meeting desired outcomes.
CASE STUDY 5:
IRISH PLASTIC BAG LEVY
EMPOWER
Natural resources
Despite their diversity, natural resources can be preserved with adequate
pricing mechanisms to reflect their long-term value for society.
Overview
Successful environmental fiscal reform in The sustainability challenges in natural
the natural resource sector involves building resources are immense. Estimates suggest
strategic partnerships between pro-reform that “30 percent of global forest cover has
stakeholders (World Bank 2005). been cleared, while another 20 percent has
been degraded” (WRI 2016).
Over one billion people depend on forest
goods and services for their economic Meanwhile, the rate of over-exploited and
livelihoods, and on fisheries for food security crashed fisheries is increasing (Figure 8).
and protein (UNEP 2011).
With vested economic interests and
The resources of water and agriculture have livelihoods depending on natural resource
even bigger influence groups. access, implementation of fiscal reform can
face significant challenges in terms of social
acceptance.
CASE STUDY 6:
COSTA RICA’S PES
sequestration, iii) biodiversity conservation
BACKGROUND and iv) preservation of scenic areas. Initially,
the system worked on a first-come first-serve
Naturally endowed with lush flora and fauna, basis but was amended to address priority
the country experienced one of Latin America’s areas that have been neglected. Contracts
fastest deforestation rates until the mid-1980s, range between 5-10 years. Funding is raised
with forest cover declining from 70% to 20%. from earmarked sources, e.g. fossil fuel and
This development was on the one hand induced water taxes, reaching approx. 12 million USD/
by the government’s aspiration to colonise new year.
land and high commodity prices of beef, coffee
and bananas on the other. RESULTS AND COMPLEMENTARY
MEASURES
OBJECTIVES
The PES is considered a lighthouse in
The PES was created to complement the public conservation policy by many observers. In
conservation system by improving protective fact, since its introduction in 1996, nearly 1
and restorative measures on privately- million hectares of forest enjoyed protection
held land. The two main objectives include or regeneration in a relatively small country.
protecting existing forests (and eliminate 4.4 million trees were planted and the
conservation gaps, i.e. areas with no protection forest cover is stabilizing at 52%. The PES
status) and regenerating degraded or secondary complements stricter regulatory measures
forests. such as prohibitions and national parks. The
system underwent review and is supposed
DESIGN OF THE INSTRUMENT improve its data-collection to account more
comprehensively for social impacts beyond
The law specifies for ecosystem services
financial transactions.
for which direct payments are provided to
(Porras, et al. 2013)
land owners: i) water protection, ii) carbon
32
Linking GHG emission reduction, water program where entities can purchase credits
quality, or biodiversity improvements in the in a natural resource sector from a person or
natural resource sectors to offset schemes organization that is undertaking a project that
can be a cost-efficient way of reducing leads to reducing pollution.
pollution and transitioning to sustainable use
of natural resources. Natural resource projects may vary greatly, from
fertilizer management, to rice management
To set up an offset scheme, governments systems and soil carbon building (Koper 2014).
need to establish a voluntary or mandatory
BOX 5:
ALBERTA CARBON OFFSET SYSTEM
Project must follow government approved From 2007 to 2012 agricultural offsets
protocols that ensure emissions reductions generated an estimated 132 million CAD
are “real, demonstrable, and quantifiable, for farmers and aggregators, representing
additional to what would have occurred roughly 11 million tons of GHG emissions
otherwise”. Once projects are registered reduced.
offset credits can be sold to entities with
a provincially mandated GHG reduction (Alberta Environment and Parks, 2015)
target. (Nolan 2015)
The Province of Alberta, Canada developed a carbon offset system explained in Box 5 and Figure 10.
key
learning points
1
For greater reform impact, revenues raised through fiscal measures can be reinvested to
achieve additional improvements and raise social acceptance.
2
Green fiscal reform approaches can be applied across sectors. Moreover, reform in one sector
can support efforts in other domains, e.g. reforms in fossil fuel subsidies can be redirected to
supporting sustainable management of natural resources.
3
Choice and design of a fiscal instrument should consider concerns of stakeholders, particularly
their vulnerability to price changes, and other impacts (e.g. re-bound effects, availability of
alternatives etc.).
4
Well-designed fiscal instruments promote behavioural change in both producers and
consumers, thus influencing supply and demand.
36
REFERENCES
Alberta Environment and Parks. (2015) “The Alberta Carbon Offset System.” Alberta Environment
and Parks. August 25.
APEIS. n.d. Deposit-Refund Systems for PET Bottles in Taiwan. Kanagawa: IGES.
Bayar, Tildy. (2013) “Uganda Launches Innovative Feed-in Tariff Programme.” Renewable Energy
World.
CBD (2016)
JulyAichi
2. http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/articles/2013/07/uganda-launches-
Biodiversity Targets. https://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/.
innovative-feed-in-tariff-programme.html.
Colchero, M.A., and S. Ng (2015) Changes in Prices After an Excise Tax to Sweetened Sugar
Beverages
Binswanger, Was Implemented
H.P. (1991) in Mexico:
“Brazialian PoliciesEvidence from Urban
that Encourage Areas.
Deforestation in the Amazon.” World
Development 821-829.
CPI (2015) Global Landscape of Climate Finance 2015. San Francisco.
Byakola. n.d. “Case: Uganda Feed-in Tariff for Renewable Energy.” INFORSE. http://www.
inforse.org/Case/Case-Uganda-FiT.php3.
IMF (2014) Getting Energy Prices Right. From Principle to Practice. Washington, DC.
— (2015) Harnessing the Power of Fiscal Policy to Mitigate Inequality. Washington, DC.
— (2016)Air
California After Paris:Board.
Resources Fiscal,(2009).
Macroeconomic,
“Discussion
andofFinancial
EmissionsImplications
Leakage Issues
of Climate
in Cap-and-
Change,
Trade.”
IMF Staff ARB.
Discussion
April 13.Note.
http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/capandtrade/meetings/041309/presentation.
Washington, DC.
pdf.
OECD (2013) The Swedish Tax on Nitrogen Dioxide Emissions, Lessons in Environmental Policy
Reform,
Carl, J. andEnvironment
Fedor, D. (2016)
Policy
Tracking
Paper global
No. 2. carbon
Paris. revenues: Asurvey of carbon taxes versus cap-
and-tradein the real world.
UN (1992) Convention on Biological Diversity. Rio de Janeiro.
Climate Action Reserve. (2015) Introduction to Carbon Markets in Mexico. Los Angeles : CAR.
UNCED (1992) Agenda 21. Rio de Janeiro.
Davis, M. (2012) “China’s carbon markets push: Huge potential, but daunting challenges.” SEI.
April
UNEP (2011)
24. http://www.sei-international.org/-news-archive/2356-chinas-carbon-markets-push-
Towards a Green Economy. Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty
huge-potential-but-daunting-challenges.
Eradication. Nairobi.
— (2016) Fiscal Policies and the SDGs. Policy Brief. Geneva.
Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government. (2007) “Plastic Bags.” Environment,
Community
UNFCCC (2015)and Paris
Local
Agreement.
Government. Paris.
http://www.environ.ie/en/Environment/Waste/PlasticBags/.
(2012)
Eliasson,
UNGA J. (2014)
Resolution
The Stockholm
66/288, The
congestion
Future We
charges:
Want. an
New
overview.
York. Stockholm.
— (2015a) A/RES/69/313. Addis Ababa Action Agenda of the Third International Conference
on Financing
European for Development.
Commission. (2016) “Carbon
New leakage.”
York. Climate Action. 1 20. http://ec.europa.eu/clima/
policies/ets/cap/leakage/index_en.htm.
— (2015b) A/RES/70/1 Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development.
European WorldAgency.
Environment Future(2005)
CouncilMarket-based
et al. 2013. Powering
instruments
Africa
for through
environmental
Feed-inpolicy
Tariffs.
in
Europe.
AdvancingCopenhagen.
renewable energy to meet the continent’s. Nairobi.
WSSD (2002)
Forest Johannesburg
Trends/The Plan of Implementation.
Katoomba Group/UNEP. (2008) Payments
Johannesburg.
for Ecosystem Services Getting Started:
A Primer. Nairobi.
GFEI. (2015) “Cleaner, More Efficient Vehicles.” Global Fuel Economy Initiative . http://www.
unep.org/transport/gfei/autotool/approaches/economic_instruments/fee_bate.asp.
Grow Africa. (2014) Fertilizer Subsidy Reform Revives Nigeria’s Agriculture. Geneva.
Haug, C., M. Frerk, A. Kachi, C. Serre, and K. Wilkening. (2014) Emissions Trading Worldwide:
International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP) Status Report 2014. Berlin: ICAP.
IRENA. (2015) Renewable Energy and Jobs - Annual Review 2015. Abu Dhabi.
Johannessen, L. M., and G. Boyer. (1999) Observations of Solid Waste Landfills in Developing
Countries. Washington: World Bank.
Kinnaman, Thomas, and Don Fullerton. (1999) The Economics of Residential Solid Waste
Management. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
McDiarmid, Margo. (2013) “Alberta lakes show chemical effects of oilsands, study finds.” CBC.
January 7. http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/alberta-lakes-show-chemical-effects-of-oilsands-
study-finds-1.1331696.
McFarland, W., S. Whitley, and G. Kissinger. (2015) Subsidies to key commodities driving forest loss.
London: ODI.
Ministry of Finance. (2015) “Tax Rates on Fuels.” Ministry of Finance. July. http://www.sbr.gov.
bc.ca/documents_library/bulletins/mft-ct_005.pdf.
Nolan, S. (2015) “Agricultural Carbon Offsets Activity Increases from 2007 to 2012.” Alberta
Agriculture and Forestry. January 22. http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$Department/deptdocs.nsf/
all/cl13212.
Porras, I., D. Barton, A. Chacon-Cascante, and M. Miranda. (2013) Learning from 20 years of Payments
for Ecosystem Services in Costa Rica. London.
38
The Economist. (2013) “Beijing’s air pollution blackest day.” The Economist. January 14. http://
www.economist.com/blogs/analects/2013/01/beijings-air-pollution.
Transport for London. (2015) “Paying the Congestion Charge .” Transport for London. https://tfl.
gov.uk/modes/driving/congestion-charge/paying-the-congestion-charge.
Tsagas, I. (2013) “Uganda drops PV FIT program.” PV Magazine. March 27. http://www.pv-
magazine.com/news/details/beitrag/uganda-drops-pv-fit-program_100010696/#axzz3yY8wA
TV6.
U.S. EPA. (2015) “Energy Efficiency.” United States Environmental Protection Agency. May 19.
http://www3.epa.gov/statelocalclimate/local/topics/energy-efficiency.html.
UN News Centre. (2010) “World must tackle over-consumption of energy, resources, UN panel
chair warns.”
UNEP. (2016) Fiscal Incentives for Indonesian Palm Oil Production: Pathways for Alignment with
Green Growth. Nairobi.
Union of Concerned Scientists. n.d. “Coal power: air pollution.” Union of Concerned Scientists.
http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/coalvswind/c02c.html#.VqoQtI-cGM8.
URS. (2013) Payments for Ecosystem Serivces: A Best Practice Guide. London.
Withana, S. (2015) Overcoming obstacles to green fiscal reform, GGKP Research Committee on
Fiscal Instruments, Working Paper 02/2015. UNEP.
World Bank. (2013) “Global Waste on Pace to Triple by 2100.” The World Bank. October 30.
http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2013/10/30/global-waste-on-pace-to-triple.
—. (2006) Reforming Agricultural Subsidies: “No regrets” policies for livelihoods and the
environment. Washington.
Abbreviations
BAU Business-as-usual
CAD Canadian Dollar
CDM Clean Development Mechanism
ETS Emissions Trading System
EUR Euro
FiT Feed-in Tariff
GDP Gross Domestic Product
GFEI Global Fuel Economy Initiative
GHG Greenhouse Gas
GIZ German Development Cooperation
ICAP International Carbon Action Partnership
IEA International Energy Agency
IETA International Emissions Trading Association
IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
IRENA International Renewable Energy Agency
kWh Kilowatthour
MW Megawatt
NDC Nationally Determined Contribution
OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
PAYT Pay-As-You-Throw
PET Polyethylene Terephthalate
PM Particulate Matter
SCP Sustainable Consumption and Production
SEMARNAT Mexican Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources
tCO2e Ton of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent
UNDESA United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs
UNEP United Nations Environment Programme
US EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
USD United States Dollar
WRI World Resources Institute
WWF World Wide Fund for Nature