Feeding Difficulties in Toddlers: Causes & Solutions
Feeding Difficulties in Toddlers: Causes & Solutions
F
or infants and toddlers habits. One toddler prefers spicy
demonstrating feeding foods whereas another child finds
problems, it is critical to find spicy foods to be overwhelming.
These differences, if extreme, may
the basis for the problems to create
be caused by sensory processing
more pleasurable mealtimes for the
issues. If a child has a sensory
child, his or her family members,
“
processing problem, one or more
and caregivers. Feeding difficulties developmental feeding difficulties
can affect general health (e.g., may persist and produce challenges
If a child has a sensory weight gain), developmental gains, for the child and his or her
and emotional well-being (Benoit, caregivers at each mealtime. For
processing problem, one 2000; Rudolph & Link, 2002). example, one infant may need more
Understanding the cause of feeding flavorful foods to elicit a willingness
or more developmental problems and developing to eat, or a highly sensitive toddler
may eat only certain textures of
appropriate interventions can
foods or may refuse table foods,
feeding difficulties may promote feeding-related
developmental skills (e.g., pouring,
such as meat or fruits. Signs of
feeding difficulties or “red flags”
utensil use), facilitate overall
persist and produce development (Chatoor, 2009;
may be first seen in an infant or
toddler who is not meeting
Gomez, Baird & Jung, 2004), and
challenges for the child enhance family relationships.
developmental feeding milestones,
including successful weaning from
There is a growing knowledge breast to bottle feeding and from
and his or her caregivers base regarding sensory processing bottle to solids and/or cup (see
problems and their possible effects Table 1 for examples of red flags).
at each mealtime. on daily routines and activities
(Kranowitz, 2005; Lynch & Simpson,
Providing parents and other
caregivers with information about
Table 1
Red Flags of Feeding-Related Sensory Processing Problems
Does not mouth or explore with mouth when developmentally appropriate
Excessive gagging, coughing, retching, or vomiting that interferes with eating or nutrition
Weight loss or lack of weight gain for at least 2 to 3 months
Severely restricted variety of foods and/or liquids
Difficulty progressing or inability to progress to solid foods
Restricted volume intake
Stressful mealtimes (e.g., power struggle between toddler and parent)
Severe behavior problems at mealtimes (e.g., throwing food items)
Persistent food refusal
Feeding periods longer than 30 to 45 minutes
Prolonged dependence on puréed foods
Holding and/or storing food in cheeks or under tongue interfering with food intake
“
The ability to regulate
eating. The ability to regulate
information to generate an
appropriate response to food choices
(sensory modulation) is an
children who demonstrate sensitivity
to stimuli have low thresholds and
tend to be “distractible or
hyperactive” (Dunn, 1997, p. 31).
information to generate an important ability for appropriate These children may not be able to
interactions in any environment. settle down to eat, have trouble
appropriate response to Infants and toddlers with poor
sensory modulation are likely to
remaining at the table, or fuss to get
out of their high chairs. They can
have maladaptive behaviors, or also be very cautious or negative
food choices (sensory behaviors that negatively affect about trying new foods, such as
feeding behaviors, which may those with novel colors, flavors, or
modulation) is an include feeding problems. In relation textures.
to children’s sensory processing, The third component is sensory
important ability for Dunn (1997) proposed four
components of sensory modulation
seeking. These children have high
neurological thresholds and engage in
related to problems with sensory behaviors to increase their sensory
appropriate interactions in processing: (a) poor registration, (b) experiences. These children fidget,
sensitivity to stimuli, (c) sensory play with their food, touch everything,
any environment. seeking, and (d) sensory avoiding. and chew on nonfood objects, such
Following is a description of how as clothing, to increase sensations,
Table 2
Sample Interview Questions
Interview Protocol
“
An ABC analysis offers
develop strategies to address a wide
range of problem behaviors.
Profile (Rogers & D’Eugenio, 1981)
offers both assessment items and
activity ideas relating to feeding.
In addition, the Infant/Toddler
Standardized Assessment
documentation of Sensory Profile (Dunn, 2002)
This type of assessment is examines six areas of sensory
processing, including feeding-related
antecedents and available in a number of different
formats, including parent interviews, concerns, such as mouthing objects
direct observation, and criterion- and food refusal. Caregivers rate the
consequences that referenced systems. The following infant or toddler on a scale from
examples include items related to almost always to almost never. The
can be used to develop feeding and follow established resulting scores indicate whether the
procedures for administration, child exhibits low registration,
sensation seeking, sensory sensitivity,
strategies to address a scoring, and interpretation. Results
assist in developing intervention or avoidance of sensation. An
plans that can be implemented by example of a comprehensive
wide range of problem parents, caregivers, and standardized assessment instrument
professionals. Two examples of that includes sensory processing
behaviors. frequently used standardized and/or feeding-related items is the
assessments are provided. Battelle Developmental Inventory
Feeding Strategies
instructional or behavioral target
rather than a normative sample) and The following sections provide an
curriculum-based (facilitates overview of general feeding strategies
gathering information about a child’s and specific sensory modulation
skills in relation to a curriculum and strategies that can be used to assist
using information as a basis for infants and toddlers with sensory-
making instructional decisions) based feeding difficulties. Feeding
assessment system focusing on all strategies will be described
developmental areas. The 685 HELP (naturalistic to more structured) in
skills are grouped into 58 “strands” addition to strategies addressing the
for assessment and progress four components of sensory
monitoring. HELP strands include modulation. Specifically, the first set
items related to sensory processing of strategies is appropriate for the
and oral motor development, such as majority of young children, and the
“hypersensitive responses,” sensory modulation strategies focus
Tom and Tina took Marcee to see her and refusals of food came when
pediatrician, Dr. Steeples, with their Marcee was asked to transition from
concerns about Marcee’s eating an activity she enjoyed. For example,
behavior. He recommended an at child care, snack time was right
evaluation with a developmental after outside play, which is one of
pediatrician, Dr. Ramirez, because Marcee’s favorite activities. Dinner at
feeding issues were not his area of home follows play with a
expertise. After an in-depth interview neighborhood friend or outdoors. In
with both Tom and Tina and reviewing light of her diagnosis, feeding
Tina’s and Jenna’s feeding diaries, FBA strategies to address the two sensory
data (ABC analysis), and observations modulation issues were recommended:
of Marcee eating a snack in her office, Schedule feeding opportunities before
Dr. Ramirez diagnosed Marcee with a outdoor playtime as much as possible
sensory processing disorder in the and reinforce Marcee’s intake of
areas of poor registration and avoided foods. Dr. Ramirez encouraged
sensation avoidance. Assessment data consistency at all mealtimes and with
indicated that the disruptive behaviors all caregivers.
“
The environment plays
specialized positioning in a toddler’s
child care center should be mirrored
in his or her home. Strategies
should also be monitored for
adult responsiveness to these needs.
For example, if an infant feeds best
in a quiet room on a caregiver’s lap,
he or she should not be fed by an
adult who prefers to place him or
a key role in the effectiveness and phased out when
her in an infant carrier.
no longer needed (e.g., use of an
adapted cup).
use of feeding Activity-based intervention (ABI).
Environmental modifications. The ABI offers the most naturalistic
strategies to address environment plays a key role in the option for general intervention
use of feeding strategies to address (Pretti-Frontczak & Bricker, 2004).
sensory processing sensory processing difficulties. The Parents and caregivers work
high chair a toddler uses during together to identify opportunities to
difficulties. mealtimes can affect his or her
acceptance of food items. For
work on feeding skills throughout
the infant’s or toddler’s daily
instance, if the child’s high chair is routines and activities so that
” inclined too far forward or back, he parents and caregivers can readily
Table 3
Resources for Feeding-Related Materials
Ms. Jamison provided Jenna with ate at least three bites of provided
several new cups to try with Marcee. snacks and mealtime items. If the
She also offered packets of Thick It to weather did not allow outdoor play,
add to her juice to give it a thicker Tina or Jenna would read Marcee a
consistency. Jenna agreed to try both favorite book. During the 1st week, a
and spoke with Tina about the new slight increase in Marcee’s food intake
strategies. It was also decided that was noted, because Tom and Tina
Marcee would be given 5 additional were very consistent about following
minutes of outdoor playtime when she through with the new strategies.
Table 4
Additional Resources
Books
Ayres, A. J. (2005). Sensory integration and the child: 25th anniversary edition. Los Angeles:
Western Psychological Services.
Biel, L., & Peske, N. (2005). Raising a sensory smart child: The definitive handbook for helping
your child with sensory integration issues. New York: Penguin.
Bundy, A. C., Lane, S. J., Fisher, A. G., & Murray, E. A. (2002). Sensory integration: Theory and
practice. Fort Collins, CO: F. A. Davis.
Koomar, J., Kranowitz, C., Szklut, S., Balzer-Martin, L., Haber, E., & Sava, D. I. (2007). Answers to
questions teachers ask about sensory integration: Forms, checklists, and practical tools for
teachers and parents. Arlington, TX: Future Horizons.
Kranowitz, C. S. (2005). The out-of-sync child: Recognizing and coping with sensory processing
disorder. New York: Perigee.
Miller, L. J., & Fuller, D. (2006). Sensational kids: Hope and help for children with sensory
processing disorder. New York: Penguin.
Web Sites
[Link] Provides information about
feeding milestones from birth to 3 years of age.
[Link] Provides
articles, tips for parents, and warning signs of feeding disorders.
[Link] Provides a sensory processing
disorder checklist and links to products such as adapted cups and seating devices.
Table 5
Feeding-Related Sensory Processing Issues
Poor registration: high Requires a great deal of Withdrawn Offer foods with texture (e.g., crunchy foods)
neurological threshold; stimulation to eat or Difficult to engage Provide foods with strong flavors and/or
responds minimally drink (intense smells
to surroundings flavors, textures) Add temperature to foods (e.g., very
Sensitivity to stimuli: Less input to get a Hyperactive cold water to drink, warm apple sauce)
low neurological response Distractible Eat at a quiet table or in a quiet room
threshold; responds Difficulty focusing Decrease distractions during mealtime
to most elements on task at hand (e.g., turn off lights, turn off music)
in surroundings
Sensory seeking: devotes Needs more input, such Fidgets Provide physical activity before mealtime
a great deal of energy as movement, touch, sound, Plays with food Add texture to food (e.g., raisins to oatmeal)
seeking out stimulation and visual stimulation to Handles everything Offer adapted positioning, such as therapeutic
to meet neurological respond to meal Chews on nonfood items ball or sit pad in chair
threshold needs and snack items Suggest child brings preferred object to
mealtimes (e.g., favorite book, fidget toy)
Sensory avoiding: expends Withdrawn Engages in behaviors to avoid Use a picture schedule to indicate what is
a great deal of energy to Develops rituals for situations that might be coming next or what to expect during the day
avoid stimulation because daily activities overwhelming (e.g., noisy Sit child at the end or alone at a table
of low neurological dinner table, textured Provide transition object during mealtime
threshold sensitivity snack items)
“
sensory modulation seek stimulation For both feeding strategies and
while they eat. Offering a variety of specific sensory modulation strategies,
Consistency of techniques finger foods provides stimulation
and also helps focus the young
it is critical to monitor the child’s
progress. As children’s feeding needs
child’s senses for new food are supported effectively, there are
between and among experiences. For example, eating positive outcomes adults look for.
saltines provides tactile and The following sections address these
caregivers is critical. gustatory (relating to sense of taste) areas.
feedback to prepare the child for the
”
introduction of a new texture or Progress Monitoring
consistency of a familiar food item,
such as oatmeal containing dried Feeding strategies must be
fruit pieces. A finger food, such as monitored to ensure progress in
chicken nuggets, can also be used to targeted skills and behaviors.
help a toddler explore new tastes, Additional ABC analyses can be
such as dipping sauces (e.g., ranch, conducted to examine the young
barbecue, honey mustard). An SLP child’s behaviors after modifications
or OT can offer weighted utensils or changes to antecedents and/or
and cups with straws to meet the consequences. Criterion-referenced
child’s unique sensory seeking needs. assessment also offers opportunities
to monitor progress through
Sensory avoiding. The final type of frequent data collection. This
sensory modulation difficulty approach also offers linkages with
necessitates the use of individualized curriculum-based assessment systems
strategies for the infant or toddler to to ensure that strategies are
become comfortable with new foods implemented during daily feeding-
instead of avoiding them. It is best related activities and routines (Pretti-
to begin with preferred foods while Frontczak & Bricker, 2004).
supporting the infant or toddler to Standardized instruments, such as
progress to the next feeding-related
developmental milestone. Consis-
tency of techniques between and
among caregivers is critical,
especially if the child is prone to
avoidance behaviors, such as having
a tantrum, throwing food, and
gagging. In addition, results of an
FBA assist in determining specific
antecedents and consequences as
well as the function of the problem
behaviors (escape, gain access to an
item or activity, gain or maintain
attention from an individual, or
obtain stimulation). For example, if
a toddler avoids textured foods, it is
important to offer the child these
food items using strategies
specifically addressing sensation
avoidance behaviors (e.g., peer
models, reinforcement) so that over
time, the foods become preferred.
“
Eating solid foods and
There are a number of positive
outcomes to addressing feeding
problems in infants and toddlers.
Most important is the child’s
community (e.g., McDonald’s,
birthday parties). Furthermore,
addressing feeding problems
provides opportunities to acquire
taking in adequate improved feeding. Eating solid foods and refine developmental skills (e.g.,
and taking in adequate amounts of pincer grasp to pick up raisins, eye-
fluids provides nourishment, which hand coordination for spoon
amounts of fluids provides is particularly important for brain feeding; Olive, 2004). These
development, general health, and developmental gains can be
nourishment, which is improving relationships between the considered positive “by-products” of
young child and his or her parents sensory modulation-focused feeding
particularly important for and caregivers (Benoit, 2000; strategies.
brain development,
general health, and
The changes in mealtime routines plate with Tater Tots and French fries.
improving relationships were helpful to Marcee and her Because Tina was concerned about the
family. She no longer throws food and lack of fruit and vegetables in Marcee’s
between the young child now sits at the table with her siblings
for up to 10 min. She needs the air
diet, she began to add small chunks of
apples and peaches to Marcee’s
cushion only when a snack or meal oatmeal. Marcee would eat around
and his or her parents and requires use of a spoon. She does not them or spit them out when she found
use it for finger foods or cup drinking. them. Ms. Jamison suggested pureeing
caregivers Adding new foods to her these items. Tina pureed the fruit
repertoire is taking time but is before adding it to Marcee’s oatmeal,
Note
You may reach Stacy Thompson by e-mail at stacyt@[Link].
References
Alpern, G. D. (2007). Developmental Profile 3 (DP-3). Los Angeles: Western
Psychological Services.
Benoit, D. (2000). Feeding disorders, failure to thrive, and obesity. In C. H.
Zeanah (Ed.), Handbook of infant mental health (pp. 339-352). York, PA:
Guilford.
Birch, L. L. (1999). Development of food preferences. Annual Review of
Nutrition, 19, 41-62.
Branscomb, K. R., & Goble, C. B. (2008). Infants and toddlers in group care:
Feeding practices that foster emotional health. Young Children, 63(6),
28-33.
Carruth, B. R., Skinner, J., Houck, K., Moran, J., Coletta, F., & Ott, D. (1998).
The phenomenon of “picky eater”: A behavioral marker in eating patterns
of toddlers. Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 17, 180-186.
Chatoor, I. (2009). Sensory food aversions in infants and toddlers. Zero to
Three, 29(3) 44-49.
Dunn, W. (1997). The impact of sensory processing abilities on the daily lives of
young children and their families: A conceptual model. Infants and Young
Children, 9(4), 23-35.
Dunn, W. (2001). The sensations of everyday life: Theoretical, conceptual and
pragmatic considerations. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55,
608-620.
Dunn, W. (2002). Sensory profile: Caregiver questionnaire. San Antonio, TX:
Pearson.
Dunn, W. (2007). Supporting children to participate successfully in
everyday life by using sensory processing knowledge. Infants and Young
Children, 20(2), 84-101.
Forestell, C. A., & Mennella, J. A. (2007). Early determinants of fruit and
vegetable acceptance. Pediatrics, 120, 1247-1254.
Furuno, S., O’Reilly, K. A., Hosaka, C. M., Inatsuka, T. T., Zeisloft-Falbey, B.,
& Allman, T. (1988). Hawaii Early Learning Profile. Palo Alto, CA:
VORT.
Girolami, P. A., & Scotti, J. R. (2001). Use of analog functional analysis in
determining the function of mealtime behavior problems. Education and
Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36,
207-223.
Gomez, C., Baird, S., & Jung, L. A. (2004). Regulatory disorder
identification, diagnosis, and intervention planning: Untapped resources
for facilitating development. Infants and Young Children, 17(4), 327-339.
Hendy, H. M. (2002). Effectiveness of trained peer models to encourage food
acceptance in preschool children. Appetite, 39, 217-225.
Howe, M. B., Brittain, L. A., & McCathren, R. B. (2004). Meeting the sensory
needs of young children in classrooms. Young Exceptional Children, 8(1),
11-19.
Kranowitz, C. S. (2005). The out-of-sync child: Recognizing and coping with
sensory processing disorder. New York: Perigee.