0% found this document useful (0 votes)
123 views15 pages

2013 The Value Stream Flow Report

The report analyzes data from 214 value streams across industries to benchmark performance. Elite performers have team item lead times of 1-13 days and portfolio lead times up to 85 days. They deliver work within expectations 79% of the time and have low variability and high flow efficiency and capacity utilization.

Uploaded by

fernando.petry
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
123 views15 pages

2013 The Value Stream Flow Report

The report analyzes data from 214 value streams across industries to benchmark performance. Elite performers have team item lead times of 1-13 days and portfolio lead times up to 85 days. They deliver work within expectations 79% of the time and have low variability and high flow efficiency and capacity utilization.

Uploaded by

fernando.petry
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

2023

The Value Stream Flow Report


Comparative Analysis and Industry Performance Benchmarking

© Flomatika Trading Co Pty. Ltd. All Rights Reserved


The Value Stream Flow Report

Executive Summary
The Value Stream Flow Report presents the findings of a comprehensive study on the
performance of 214 different Value Streams across 11 industries and four continents. The
dataset, which includes over 130,000 data points, is a representative subset of aggregated
and de-identified data drawn from the Flomatika platform.

The study sheds light on several critical aspects of Value Stream performance, including the
time it takes to complete work items, the predictability of delivery, the variability of lead
time, flow efficiency, and capacity utilisation.

This report is the first of its kind to provide such detailed insights, representing a valuable
new contribution to the industry.

Our decision to share these findings more broadly was prompted by the growing demand
from our clients for a better understanding of what success looks like and what they can
expect as they embark on their continuous improvement journey.

We hope these insights will serve as a valuable benchmark for our clients and the industry
at large, and we look forward to building on these findings as trends emerge over the
coming years and our dataset continues to grow.

I hope it provides valuable insights to help you improve your own processes and Value
Streams and inspires you to continue your journey towards delivering greater value to your
customers.

Marcio Sete
Chief Product & Technology Officer, CEO
Flomatika
© Flomatika Trading Co Pty. Ltd. All Rights Reserved
The Value Stream Flow Report

Methodology

© Flomatika Trading Co Pty. Ltd. All Rights Reserved


The Value Stream Flow Report

Sampling Dataset

The sampling dataset used in this report is a representative


subset of aggregated and de-identified data drawn from the
Flomatika platform.

The dataset includes 130,908 data points from 214 different


Value Streams across 11 industries and four continents.

The dataset is sufficiently large and diverse to enable


meaningful analysis and provide valuable insights into the
trends and patterns observed in the industry.

© Flomatika Trading Co Pty. Ltd. All Rights Reserved


The Value Stream Flow Report

Sampling Dataset

© Flomatika Trading Co Pty. Ltd. All Rights Reserved


The Value Stream Flow Report

Defining the cohorts

The Elite, High, Medium, and Low Performers cohorts were


determined by splitting the data into quarters.

Low Performers exhibit performance metrics in the first quartile (25%


from smallest to largest of numbers)

Medium Performers display performance metrics in the second


quartile (between 25.1% and 50%—till median).

High Performers exhibit performance metrics in the third quartile (51%


to 75%—above the median), and finally,

Elite Performers exhibit performance metrics in the fourth quartile


(25% of largest numbers).
© Flomatika Trading Co Pty. Ltd. All Rights Reserved
The Value Stream Flow Report

Key Findings

© Flomatika Trading Co Pty. Ltd. All Rights Reserved


The Value Stream Flow Report

1. How long does it take to complete work items?

Lead time for team-level work items


6 days or less 50% of the time
37 days or less 85% of the time

Lead time for portfolio-level work items


76 days or less 50% of the time
300 days or less 85% of the time

Lead Time: The elapsed time between commitment and departure points of each workflow.
Team-level work Items: Actionable pieces of work such as User Stories, Bugs and Tasks.
Portfolio-level work Items: Aggregators of work such as Epics and Features.

© Flomatika Trading Co Pty. Ltd. All Rights Reserved


The Value Stream Flow Report

1. How long does it take to complete team-level


work items?

Elite Performers: 1 to 13 days


High Performers: 14 to 22 days
Medium Performers: 23 to 56 days
Low Performers: 57 days or more

Elite and high performers are significantly faster when


completing work items.

Considering team-level work items at the 85th percentile of their lead time distribution.

© Flomatika Trading Co Pty. Ltd. All Rights Reserved


The Value Stream Flow Report

1. How long does it take to complete portfolio-level


work items?

Elite Performers: up to 85 days (3mo)

High Performers: 86 to 165 days (3mo - 5.5mo)

Medium Performers: 166 to 285 days (5.5mo - 9.5mo)

Low Performers: 286 days or more (9.5+mo)

Elite and high performers are significantly faster when


completing work items.

Considering portfolio-level work items at the 85th percentile of their lead time distribution.

© Flomatika Trading Co Pty. Ltd. All Rights Reserved


The Value Stream Flow Report

2. How often do Value Streams deliver work within


customers' service level expectations?

Elite Performers: 79% of the time or more


High Performers: 67 to 78% of the time
Medium Performers: 53 to 66% of the time

Low Performers: 52% of the time or less

That is how often Value Streams respect the lead time


considered appropriate by customers/stakeholders for
different types of demand.

© Flomatika Trading Co Pty. Ltd. All Rights Reserved


The Value Stream Flow Report

3. What percentage of Value Streams have low


variability of lead time, leading to a highly
predictable delivery system?

29% 71%
Low Variability High Variability

Whilst speed and variability represent two different aspects of Value


Streams, there's a clear correlation that lower process variability leads
to higher process speed.

Value Streams with low variability have a 73% chance of being Elite or
High performers, in contrast to 42% for Value Streams with high
variability.

Process Variability: Measured by the difference between the median and tail of a lead time distribution.

© Flomatika Trading Co Pty. Ltd. All Rights Reserved


The Value Stream Flow Report

4. What is the industry benchmark for


average Flow Efficiency?

Elite Performers: 44% or more


High Performers: 26 to 43%
Medium Performers: 6 to 25%
Low Performers: 5% or less

Flow efficiency is a measure of process efficiency that examines the percentage of time work items spend actively being worked on
versus the total time they spend in the Value Stream.

It helps to identify the time spent waiting for specialists or being blocked by internal and external dependencies, highlighting areas
where improvements can be made to increase predictability and flow.

The higher the flow efficiency, the faster work items move through the Value Stream without being delayed by bottlenecks or
inefficiencies.

© Flomatika Trading Co Pty. Ltd. All Rights Reserved


The Value Stream Flow Report

5. How Value Streams spend their capacity?

55%
32%
14%

Value Demand Failure Demand Non-Value Demand

Capacity dedicated to Value Demand


Elite and high performers dedicate significantly more capacity to
demands that can be directly correlated to customer or business value.

Elite Performers: 84% or more


High Performers: 64 to 83%
Medium Performers: 37 to 63%
Low Performers: 36% or less

Value Demand: Customer/Stakeholder requests that can be directly correlated to customer or business value.
Failure Demand: Demands to fix what wasn't executed properly the first time or demands that shouldn't be produced at all.
Non-Value Demand: Demands that do not directly correlate to customer or business value but are necessary to stay in business.
Overhead.
*** Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

© Flomatika Trading Co Pty. Ltd. All Rights Reserved


Take action!

Curious about how Flomatika can help you plan,


govern, report, and improve? Schedule a demo:
https://meetings.hubspot.com/marcio-sete

Would you like to discuss the data in the report or


visualise and understand your flow metrics?
Reach out to us at [email protected]

To know more, access https://www.flomatika.com


or check out Flomatika on Atlassian Marketplace:
https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/12301599

You might also like