0% found this document useful (0 votes)
91 views3 pages

Laplacian Derivation in Polar Form

This document derives the Laplacian in polar coordinates. It shows that the Laplacian of a function u with respect to x and y is equal to the Laplacian with respect to r and θ, plus additional terms involving first and second derivatives with respect to r and θ. The derivation involves taking derivatives of r and θ with respect to x and y, and applying the chain rule to rewrite derivatives of u in terms of partial derivatives with respect to r and θ.

Uploaded by

Naym Mia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
91 views3 pages

Laplacian Derivation in Polar Form

This document derives the Laplacian in polar coordinates. It shows that the Laplacian of a function u with respect to x and y is equal to the Laplacian with respect to r and θ, plus additional terms involving first and second derivatives with respect to r and θ. The derivation involves taking derivatives of r and θ with respect to x and y, and applying the chain rule to rewrite derivatives of u in terms of partial derivatives with respect to r and θ.

Uploaded by

Naym Mia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Derivation of the Laplacian in Polar Coordinates

We suppose that u is a smooth function of x and y, and of r and θ. We will show that

uxx + uyy = urr + (1/r)ur + (1/r2 )uθθ (1)

and
|ux |2 + |uy |2 = |ur |2 + (1/r2 )|uθ |2 . (2)

We assume that our functions are always nice enough to make mixed partials equal: uxy =
uyx , etc.
The chain rule says that, for any smooth function ψ,

ψx = ψr rx + ψθ θx
ψy = ψr ry + ψθ θy .

Now,
r = (x2 + y 2 )1/2
θ = tan−1 (y/x) + c,

(where the constant c depends on the quadrant). Therefore, after differentiating and doing
some algebra,
rx = cos θ
ry = sin θ
− sin θ
θx =
r
cos θ
θy = ,
r
implying
− sin θ
ψx = (cos θ)ψr + ψθ (3)
r
cos θ
ψy = (sin θ)ψr + ψθ . (4)
r

Formula (2) is now easy. (Apply the last two equations to ψ = u.)
If we apply equation (3) to ψ = ux , we get:

− sin θ − sin θ
uxx = (cos θ)x ur + (cos θ)uxr + ( )x uθ + uxθ .
r r
− sin θ
Applying (3) to ψ = cos θ and ψ = r , we get
µ ¶
− sin θ
(cos θ)x = (cos θ) · 0 + (− sin θ)
r
sin2 θ
= ;
r
µ ¶ µ ¶µ ¶
− sin θ cos θ sin θ − sin θ − cos θ
= +
r x r2 r r
2 cos θ sin θ
= .
r2

Applying it to ψ = ur and ψ = uθ , we get


µ ¶
− sin θ
urx = (cos θ)urr + urθ
r
µ ¶
− sin θ
uθx = (cos θ)urθ + uθθ ,
r

implying
µ ¶ µ ¶ µ ¶ µ ¶
2 sin2 θ cos θ sin θ cos θ sin θ sin2 θ
uxx = (cos θ)urr + ur − 2 urθ + 2 uθ + uθθ .
r r r2 r2
(5)
Similarly, if we apply (4) to ψ = uy , we get:
µ ¶ µ ¶
cos θ cos θ
uyy = (sin θ)y ur + (sin θ)uyr + uθ + uθy .
r y r

cos θ
Now we apply (4) to ψ = sin θ and ψ = r and get:
µ ¶
cos θ
(sin θ)y = (sin θ) · 0 + cos θ
r
cos2 θ
=
r
µ ¶ µ ¶ µ ¶
cos θ − sin θ cos θ sin θ cos θ
= −
r y r2 r2
−2 sin θ cos θ
= .
r2
If we apply (4) to ψ = ur and ψ = uθ we get:
µ ¶
cos θ
ury = (sin θ)urr + urθ
r
µ ¶
cos θ
uθy = (sin θ)urθ + uθθ .
r

Plugging these all in, we get


µ ¶ µ ¶ µ ¶ µ ¶
2 cos2 θ cos θ sin θ cos θ sin θ cos2 θ
uyy = (sin θ)urr + ur + 2 urθ − 2 uθ + uθθ .
r r r2 r2
(6)
If we add equations (5) and (6), exactly the RIGHT THINGS cancel, and exactly the
RIGHT THINGS add up to 1, and we get (1). We put the two equations on top of each
other to make this clearer:
µ ¶ µ ¶ µ ¶ µ ¶
2 sin2 θ cos θ sin θ cos θ sin θ sin2 θ
uxx = (cos θ)urr + ur − 2 urθ + 2 uθ + uθθ
r r r2 r2
µ ¶ µ ¶ µ ¶ µ ¶
2 cos2 θ cos θ sin θ cos θ sin θ cos2 θ
uyy = (sin θ)urr + ur + 2 urθ − 2 uθ + uθθ .
r r r2 r2

You might also like