Indiana State Response to Motion to Compel
Indiana State Response to Motion to Compel
COMES NOW the State of Indiana, by Prosecuting Attorney, Nicholas C. McLeland, and
respectfully files its response to the Defendant’s Amended Motion to Compel and Request for
Sanctions filed March 17, 2024. The State would ask the Court to consider the following:
1. In response to Request paragraph 5(a)(ii), on January 30, 2024, the 02D2 Allen Physical
notified the Defense of videos that are missing corresponding audio. Specifically, on
page 5 in the 6th bullet point, is stated: the hard drive labeled Delphi DVR Drive 1
which this duplicate was made. This is the same loss described in the Delphi Police
Chief Mullin two-page letter describing loss of data from inserting Drive 1 into the DVR
to extract an interview file and a DVR malfunction reformatted the drive thereby
appearing to erase all files. However, the belief at that time was that the lost files were
interviews from 04-28-2017 to 06-01-2017. Chief Mullin was at that time making an
educated guess as to dates of lost files, when in fact Drive 1 was taken to Indiana State
Police for recovery effort. That Drive 1 was in the possession of Indiana State Police
from approximately June 2018 until approximate November 2022, for recovery efforts,
and a copy of the original Drive 1 in its current state is described in 02d2 Allen Physical
Discovery Release. Therefore, it is now known that the video files on Delphi Drive 1
Export are interviews from the dates of 02-25-2017 through 04-07-2017 without audio,
as audio files were not recovered, while the video files were recovered.
a. the Sate provided two reports of Steve Mullin created when he was Delphi Chief
length, during the hearing on March 18, 2024, explained the efforts made to
recover the data, circumstances surrounding the two DVR malfunctions, and was
communication with Indiana State Police regarding Drive 1 from the second
incident of DVR malfunction and found an email from February 23, 2018.
d. That specific to this Motion to Compel, Investigator Mullin would testify that the
recovery software from China was not able to be purchased through a local
agency. Therefore, he contacted Indiana State Police Brian Bunner and ISP did
purchase the software, but it was not successful in recovery of Drive 1. That no
Indiana State Police report was generated because this was not a forensic
examination. When the drive was returned, Mullin was gathering all investigation
documented, as stated above, that hard drive labeled Delphi DVR Drive 1
drive from which this duplicate was made. These are video only files.
3. That in response to Request paragraph 5c, if the Defense opens the files containing law
enforcement reports and runs a keyword search based on the date of the interview, the
result should direct them to reports referencing the date for a determination of who
participated in interviews on said date. The State has not compiled a list of who was
interviewed, or which officers conducted the interviews, during the dates in question,
because without audio, the files are not helpful to the investigation or trial preparation of
this case. This loss is not the result of intentional conduct but rather a malfunction of
4. In response to Request to paragraph 6, the information has been provided in the discovery
response dated March 8, 2024, the testimony of Investigator Mullin at the hearing on
March 18, 2024, and the contents of this Response. No further explanation has been
reduced to writing.
6. In response to request 10, phone dump data does exist, and it has been provided.
7. In response to request 11, all geo-fence data in the State’s possession has been provided
to the Defense and is listed in the Discovery Releases. The agency responsible for the
interpretation of the geo-fence data is the FBI CAST team; specifically, Special Agent
Kevin Horan (retired) and Special Agent Sabric.
8. That to the State’s knowledge, the above response addresses all inquiries found within
files their response and would ask the Court to dismiss Defendant’s Amended Motion to Compel
Nicholas C. McLeland
Attorney #28300-08
Prosecuting Attorney
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing instrument was served upon the Defendant’s attorney
of record, through personally delivery, ordinary mail with proper postage affixed or by service through the e-filing
system and filed with Carroll Circuit Court, this __23rd___ day of March 2024.
Nicholas C. McLeland
Attorney #28300-08
Prosecuting Attorney