Liberia Consultation FINAL
Liberia Consultation FINAL
Workshop webpage
Press Release: UNDP CO EPA The New Dawn Liberia
Workshop agenda
Policy Matrix
Data Matrix
Draft project workflow
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
From 31 October to 4 November 2022, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of Liberia and
UNDP Country Office Liberia, with support from the Swedish International Development
Cooperation Agency (Sida), brought together over 27 technical and policy experts from Liberia
and around the globe to discuss how spatial data can be used to identify and monitor nature-
based solutions for biodiversity, climate, and sustainable development in Liberia.
Engage key national and global stakeholders involved in the development and
implementation of science and policy for nature, climate change, and sustainable
development;
Introduce the essential life support area (ELSA) vision to identify and prioritize where
policymakers can take nature-based actions to deliver across a suite of national priorities;
Develop capacity around spatial data and the use of systematic conservation planning to
achieve the ELSA vision;
Identify strategic priorities for Liberia related to nature, climate change, and sustainable
development;
Identify the necessary global and national datasets to map these priorities; and
Evaluate the political context, integrate multiple relevant data layers, and provide clear steps
on how to use these data to deliver across commitments to the Convention on Biological
Diversity (CBD), UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), UN Convention to
Combat Desertification (UNCCD), and 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 3
Over the course of the workshop, policy experts identified the 10 top targets and indicators from
ten different national policies and plans, including:
This simple exercise provided an overview of the synergies among these diverse national
commitments and a clear landscape of targets for which spatial data and maps could support
more effective implementation. Technical experts identified national data and global data
sources on sustainable agriculture, carbon, protected areas, forests, restoration, coastal
management, urban greening jobs and livelihoods, and species that would be most appropriate
for the analysis. Together, the group reviewed the methods used to create the map to determine
revisions that would need to be made to ensure a rigorous, policy-relevant map of Liberia’s
ELSAs.
Liberia is committed to working with UNDP to complete the first map of its ELSAs to take action
for biodiversity, climate change, and sustainable development. As a participant and co-creator of
the ELSA mapping process, Liberia will serve as a global leader, modelling how spatial data can
guide progress on national and global priorities. By creating rigorous scientific methods that can
direct the implementation of environmental policy, the project supports the delivery of the three
Rio Conventions and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
This report shares key presentations and synthesizes feedback received on data, methods, and
policy targets in order to guide further action in Liberia and around the world.
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 5
WORKSHOP OUTCOMES
01 The engagement of over 27 Liberian policymakers, policy experts, scientists and GIS
practitioners to map Liberia’s ELSAs and build national spatial data capacity
A detailed review of the methods used to create the proof of concept map of
04 Liberia’s ELSAs and a compilation of suggested revisions to ensure a rigorous, policy-
relevant map of Liberia’s ELSAs
05 A commitment from EPA and UNDP to iterate on the proof of concept to guide
Liberia’s policy and planning decisions on nature, climate, and sustainable
development
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW 6
Photo by Jacob Kpehe on Unsplash
Welcoming Remarks
Part one of the workshop served to acquaint participants with the ELSA process and the virtual
platform. Given that the workshop brought together actors from many disparate organizations,
these first sessions were also essential to establishing a common understanding of Liberia’s unique
position and environmental goals.
In his remarks, Mr. Louis Kuukpen, Deputy Resident Representative, UNDP Liberia, thanked
everyone for joining and expressed his pleasure to launch the workshop on behalf of UNDP Liberia.
The Resident Representative highlighted that it is his belief that the ELSA project is a testament to
the United Nations Development Programme's commitment to support countries in implementing
nature-based solutions, using cutting-edge science to contribute to the achievement of the
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). He noted that Liberia is rich with unique biological
diversity including; 40% of the remaining Upper Guinean Rainforest in West Africa, 2,000 species of
vascular plants, including 225 timber tree species, 140 species of mammals, over 600 species of
birds, and 75 species of reptiles and amphibians.
Louis Kuukpen asserted that Liberia has ambitious goals, including the sustainability in food
production systems and the implementation of financing mechanisms for a green and resilient
economy, even though Liberia currently lacks the requisite scientific framework and decision
support tools that can help decision makers to recognize the mapping of essential life support area
Furthermore, he reminded the participants that they are “about to play a key role in a unique
exercise that combines decision-making with cutting-edge science and technology to create a
map that can lead to better outcomes around nature, climate, and sustainable development”.
Louis Kuukpen reminded the participants that they have the opportunity to influence the future
of conservation in Liberia and to show that Liberia is a champion in the use of spatial data
through their participation.
Opening remarks
Hon. Randall M. Doubayou II, Deputy Executive Director, EPA, began his opening remarks by
thanking UNDP for being a reliable development partner in Liberia’s natural resource
management. He also extended the Liberian government’s appreciation to the Swedish
International Development Cooperation Agency (SiDA) and other partners for their support on
the Mapping Nature for People and Planet in Liberia’s project. The director asserted that the
ELSA project would not have come at a better time, when Liberia just completed the greening of
the national development plan (pro-poor agenda for prosperity and development), while
preparing to implement a very ambitious Nationally Determined Contribution (NDCs). He further
stated that the spatial webtool resulting from this project - would help Liberia to identify and
prioritize nature-based solutions to protect, sustainably manage, and restore ecosystems in ways
that will conserve critical biodiversity, mitigate, and foster resilience to the impacts of climate
change.
“Liberia is very committed to sustain and protect its natural resources and fostering nature-based
solution to combat climate change and provide clean and health environment while fostering
economic development.” (EPA)
Presentation
Dr. Jamison Ervin, Manager of UNDP Global Programme on Nature for Development, presented
the vision of the Mapping Nature for People and Planet project. She explained that humanity
depends on nature in fundamental ways. As it stands, nature underpins more than half of the
global GDP, equivalent to 44 trillion USD. In addition, nature is necessary to achieve half of the
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We cannot minimize poverty or ensure water security
without healthy ecosystems.
Mapping Nature for People and Planet promotes spatial data as a tool to identify nature-based
solutions that meet multiple national priorities, objectives, and actions. Through cutting-edge
science, the project aims to identify ELSAs, areas where actions to protect, sustainably manage,
and restore vital ecosystems, can achieve policy goals for climate, nature, and sustainable
development in Liberia. To do so, the project will draw on the expertise of national policy experts
and conservationists to identify priority policy objectives for Liberia and corresponding spatial
data. Liberia, as well as the other pilot countries (Cambodia, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador,
Dominican Republic, Haiti, Kazakhstan, Nepal, Peru, South Africa, and Uganda) will be leaders in
Systematic Conservation Planning (SCP), using spatial data to take action for people and the
planet.
Essential life support areas, or ELSAs, are locations that together conserve
key biodiversity and provide humans with critical ecosystem services, such as
carbon storage, food, fresh water, water filtration, and disaster risk
reduction. For the duration of the workshop, participants worked to identify
the critical input data, refine the methods used to create the ELSA map, and
evaluate the relevance of the final map based on the Liberian context.
Presentation
Mr. Z. Elijah Whapoe, National Focal Point, Natural Capital Accounting and Liberia Forest Sector
Project, EPA, set the scene for Liberia. Mapping Nature for People and Planet is a very significant
endeavor that has the potential to play a very significant role in supporting Liberia’s development
agenda and national commitment.
Mr. Whapoe highlighted that Liberia is endowed with natural resources and has been making
efforts to protect them to improve human well-being. Efforts focused on REDD+, protected areas
establishment, ecotourism, sustainable land management, agro-ecology, and green-house gas
(GHG) emissions reduction - among others. He further explained that the spatial webtool is
paramount to help Liberia achieve the targets embedded in some of the national policy
documents, including the Nationally Determined Contribution (agriculture and forestry), the
Presentation
As a critical step in assessing national priorities and synergies across commitments on nature,
climate, and sustainable development, UNDP and the EPA undertook a rapid policy analysis of ten
key policy documents guiding national action in Liberia (Box 3). The goal of the analysis was to
identify nature-based targets from important national policy documents related to biodiversity,
climate change, and sustainable development.
Box 3:
The policy analysis highlighted a series of concerns from the ten policies that are outlined for the
hackathon exercise. To begin with, the National Adaption Plan was not included in the analysis
because all the targets are covered by the National Policy and Response Strategy to Climate
Change and the Nationally Determined Contribution. Among the ten policy documents, the
National Policy and ResponseStrategy to Climate Change, the Nationally Determined
Contribution, Liberia’s Land Degradation Neutrality Targets, the National Policy and Response
Strategy to Climate Change, were identified to contribute to most targets towards the analysis. It
was found that all of the documents are current and up to date and that lots of nature based
solution targets are present in the policy documents. In total, 55 mappable targets were
identified from the policy documents.
The analysis also highlighted that the targets’ indicators are not clear, but the targets are
nonetheless tangible. The baseline for that targets are not present in the policies; therefore, it
creates some difficulty to track the targets and how implementation actions are evolving.
This initial analysis provides the foundation of step 1 of the ELSA process (Figure 2), providing
critical inputs into the policy hackathon. During the policy hackathon, participants have the
opportunity to review the policy documents to identify targets that they feel are most important
to approach with spatial data. The goal of the Policy Hackathon is to emerge with ten priority
targets that can underpin the creation of Liberia’s ELSA map.
Marion Marigo,
Capacity Building & Biodiversity Senior Officer, Global Programme on Nature for Development,
UNDP
Marion Marigo, Capacity Building and Biodiversity Senior Officer, presented the main objectives
for the data hackathon to the participants. The ten policy commitments identified during the
policy hackathon will be used to identify which data are needed for the ELSA analysis. During this
session, national experts will give lightening talks to present national data relevant to the ELSA
analysis.
James Watson,
Director, Director of Biodiversity and Conservation Science, University of Queensland
Recording
Dr. James Watson, Director of Biodiversity and Conservation Science at the University of
Queensland, and Scott Atkinson, Technical Specialist for the Nature for Development
Programme, introduced the topic of Systematic Conservation Planning (SCP).
SCP advocates for conservation areas that are Connected, Adequate, Representative, and
Efficient (CARE). Connected conservation areas ensure that populations support each other,
recolonization is possible, and animal movement occurs. Adequate conservation ensures that the
total area under protection is enough to ensure the persistence of biodiversity features.
Representative refers to conservation across a full range of species, ecosystems, and ecosystem
services, not just iconic species. Finally, efficient conservation areas achieve their objectives at a
minimal cost.
These criteria are designed to help people identify the best places to protect. However,
identifying the ‘best’ regions is an inherently human and political process based on what is
important in a given place – this could be natural resources, ecosystem services, traditional
knowledge and heritage, or many other factors. Thus, to design an effective conservation plan,
we must identify our broad goals, specific targets, and financial or political constraints.
In many cases, different goals or targets might raise conflicting priorities. Using a simple example
from Costa Rica, if the goal was to conserve key areas of the range for two iconic species – the
panther and the resplendent quetzal – as well as the watershed for the capital city of San Jose, it
isn’t clear which what areas should be conserved as these three areas are not synonymous.
Scott Atkinson,
Tehnical Expert, UNDP, Global Programme on Nature for Development
SCP provides a simple calculation that can identify the optimal area to conserve based on the end
goal and any financial or political restraints. It relies on setting some basic guidelines around four
key components. First, it is essential to identify a quantifiable target (e.g., percentage of jaguar
habitat, percentage of resplendent quetzal habitat, and percentage of watershed). Second,
planning units, or units of land or sea on which action can be taken, need to be defined. Third, a
boundary length modifier determines the compactness of the conservation area (values greater
than zero result in more complex reserves). Finally, a penalty factor is imposed for not meeting
the target in a given scenario. SCP effectively ‘scores’ different conservation options by adding
together the cost of a planning unit, the boundary length of the reserve system, and the penalty
factor for any unmet targets. Programs such as Marxan and Prioritize R can quickly and
effectively do this type of calculation to identify the most effective conservation options – those
with the lowest score. These types of approaches can be adapted to national priorities by
changing the cost of planning units, the boundary length modifier, and the penalty factor.
Likewise, by producing a range of top conservation options, they can facilitate dialogue around
which is most appropriate for national context.
Presentation
After this introduction to the basics behind SCP, participants engaged in a demo and interactive
exercise of SCP using Marxan from Apropos Information Systems. The game presents players with
a grid of cells, each representing a planning unit or a region that could be turned into a protected
area. The red, blue, and green numbers on the cells represent the contributions that those cells
will make to three different targets, which could represent species or ecosystem services. Each
cell also has a unique price which is the cost to turn that cell into a protected area. The aim is to
design a protected area network that meets the targets around each of the three features in the
most inexpensive way.
The game also uses boundary length penalties to encourage players to connect as many of their
planning units as possible; if a player has a single clumped area, they will have a shorter boundary
and therefore will not have to pay as high of a boundary length penalty. This represents real
conservation planning where connected protected areas allow for richer ecosystems than
disparate ones. Participants inevitably found that even if they received the same information,
Marxan will always be more successful at choosing the most efficient protected areas. This
exercise served to show how software like Marxan and PriortizR can be incredible tools in SCP,
helping policymakers determine where to focus their efforts for maximum outcomes.
Presentation
Dr. Oscar Venter, Lead Scientist for the project Mapping Nature for People and Planet, UNDP,
presented on the science and underlying process behind the creation of Liberia’s proof of
concept map. He built on presentations by Ervin to show how Systematic Conservation Planning
can provide the means to deliver on the vision for mapping essential life support areas. The ELSA
mapping process, as visually represented by Venter (Figure 3) starts with assessing national
policies that relate to the CBD, UNFCCC, and SDGs. By reviewing these policies, stakeholders can
identify preferential outcomes for the ELSA mapping process firmly based in national context,
such as national priorities related to freshwater provision or biodiversity preservation.
They can also make decisions on central nature-based actions in the country such as protection,
management, and/or restoration (PMR) that will be used to achieve these outcomes. Next, the
ELSA collaboration identifies robust, dynamic national, and global data layers that can map
Liberia’s preferential outcomes and chosen nature-based actions. Finally, through an expert
review to weight these data based on national priorities, the project can produce a map of
Liberia’s ELSAs that pinpoints the location where each nature-based action should be taken to
optimize delivery of national priorities.
In the second portion of the presentation, Venter gave a demo of the pilot version of Uganda’s
ELSA tool. On the left side of the webtool’s display (Figure 4) is the ELSA optimization panel
where users can define the parameters under which to produce maps of Uganda’s ELSAs. Users
can choose to either assign costs by area, whereby protected areas costs the same across the
country, or assign costs by the human footprint, which assumes that costs will be higher in areas
with a large human population and infrastructure. Next, users can choose to either “lock-in”
current protected areas, keeping them as protected in the models or start from scratch,
disregarding current protected areas’ boundaries. Finally, users need to enter what percentages
of Uganda’s land area should be dedicated to each PMR action.
In the center panel, users choose weights, assigning values to different input data layers based on
both quality of the dataset and importance of the outcome. Presented with different data layers
related to national targets on biodiversity, climate change, and sustainable development - such
as amphibian richness or crop suitability - national experts need to determine which features are
the most valuable to Uganda. For example, if crop suitability is more pertinent to Uganda’s goals
than amphibian richness, the user might weigh crop suitability as 2.00 and amphibian richness as
.50. If they are equal in priority, both could be weighted as 1.0. With this information, the
webtool can run the optimization and create preliminary maps (Figure 5) of Uganda’s ELSAs. The
ELSA analysis can either optimize by theme, creating separate maps for Uganda’s priorities
related to biodiversity (CBD), climate change (UNFCCC), and sustainable development (SDGs), or
can create an overall map to identify actions across all of these commitments. In addition, the
tool can create other informative maps, including a heat map showing where many of the
preferred outcomes overlap. As the ELSA process progresses, inputs from national participants
will refine the webtool to more accurately represent Uganda’s priorities.
This session opened with a presentation by Marion Marigo on the ELSA "recipe", or workflow
that will guide the project in Liberia. She also provided a more detailed overview of the initial
work on the policy and data that will form the basis of the project.
Presentation
Marion Marigo described the workflow underpinning the project, using a cooking metaphor to
illustrate the diverse elements that go into creating an ELSA map. She asked participants to think
three key elements throughout the workshop and the project: (1) the flavors, or the key policy
targets that help frame Liberia’s national priorities; (2) the ingredients, or the global and national
data sets used as inputs to develop the ELSA map; and (3) the recipe, or the methods to identify
where nature-based actions can deliver on national priorities for nature, climate, and sustainable
development. She introduced participants to the 10-step ELSA process, providing practical
examples of each step (Figure 6).
She stressed that the workshop would draw on the expertise to key stakeholders to advance
specifically around steps 1, 2, and 5.
Drawing on a rapid policy analysis conducted leading up to the workshop, participants convened
to review ten national policies, plans, and strategies (Box 4). These ten national documents were
analyzed due to their focus on biodiversity, sustainable development, climate change, addressed
through nature-based solutions, or “actions to protect, sustainably manage, and restore natural
or modified ecosystems, that address societal challenges effectively and adaptively,
simultaneously providing human well-being and biodiversity benefits,” as defined by IUCN. This
analysis demonstrated numerous synergies across these policies and plans, demonstrating that
inter-institutional collaboration and implementation based on a common road map could lead to
the achievement of multiple objectives.
During the policy hackathon, participants identified key mappable targets from the national
policies, objectives, and indicators that, together, can summarize Liberia’s environmental
priorities, providing the basis for Liberia’s ELSA map. During the policy hackathon, participants
worked to identify nature-based targets related to biodiversity and ecosystems, carbon
sequestration, and sustainable development (Sessions 1-3) for which spatial data was essential to
achieve. During the fourth and final session, they worked to identify synergies and prioritize the
top targets for consideration in the ELSA analysis.
Box 4:
Presentation
Enrique Paniagua presented the results of the first rapid policy analysis of Liberia for the ELSA
project. For this analysis, all policy documents to be assessed were first identified with the
support of participants and other national partners. The first step of the analysis consisted of
understanding each document, to identify the ones containing aspirational nature-related
targets. The second step was to identify potentially mappablenature-based solutions objectives
and/or targets. A matrix was created to organize the documents and targets by macro themes
like climate change,, species and ecosystems, or sustainable development (food, water, and
jobs), to then classify them under sub-themes. According to Enrique, this exercise showed that
the most common (sub) themes present in the policies and plans analyzed included sustainable
agriculture, carbon, protected areas, forests, restoration, coastal management, urban greening
jobs and livelihoods, and species.
1. Develop and introduce a diverse range of integrated soil fertility management (IFSM)
techniques to farmers as a sustainable means of improving soil fertility, and intensifying
agricultural production. (National Policy and Response Strategy on Climate Change)
[category: sustainable agriculture]
2. Promote activities which enhance carbon density, such as reforestation, afforestation and
agroforestry initiatives across the country, which also brings benefits to reduce the stress and
pressure on natural forest and ecosystems. (National Policy and Response Strategy on
Climate Change) [category: carbon]
3. Promote consolidation of the protected area network by considering landscape approach
and ensuring that it consists of a large spectrum of forest types across various environmental
gradients to enhance connectivity between habitats and support species migration. (National
Policy and Response Strategy on Climate Change) [category: protected areas]
4. Restore 25% of priority degraded forests by 2030. (NDC) [category: forest]
5. Conserve all High Conservation Value-High Carbon Stock (HCV-HCS) forests within
agricultural, tree crop, and commercial forestry concessions, and site new concessions on
open/degraded land by 2030 (Link to Agriculture sector) (NDC & REDD Strategy) [category:
forest]
Protection: Understood from the meaning of conservation that is defined as: “The
sustainable management and protection of ecosystems and habitats to achieve maximum
environmental, social, economic, and scientific benefits for present and future generations”.
(Wildlife Conservation and Protected area Management Law, page 7, 2016)
Restoration: In accordance with the Section 90 of the EPA ACT of 2003, the restoration
includes restoring land, including the replacement of soil, the replanting of trees and other
flora and outstanding geological, archaeological or historical features of the land or the area
contiguous to the land specified in the order.
In the final day of the hybrid consultation, the participating experts reviewed the top 10 policy
commitments chosen during the policy hackathon and identified national data sets that could be
used to represent each of these commitments in the final ELSA map.
Presentation
Di Zhang presented the main objectives for the data hackathon to the participants. The 10
priority policy targets identified during the policy hackathon will be used to identify which data
are needed for the ELSA analysis. During this session, Berexford S. Jallah gave lightning talks to
present national data relevant to the ELSA analysis.
Berexford Jallah, presented a summary of available data in Liberia on land cover, land use,
protected areas, poverty index, and wetlands. He pointed out that the three main land use
activities in the country are forestry, mining and agriculture and that the related areas expect
degradation, and for this reason having datasets will help to do modelings.
Miroslav Honzak,
Senior Director, Scenario Planning and Analysis, Moore Center for Science | Conservation
International
Miroslav Honzak presented a brief presentation of the project Mapping Natural Capital in Liberia
on identifying important natural areas. The project was developed in december 2016 by
Conservation International and Mirsolav showed some of the data layers related to nature and
development that were collected, for instance, boundaries, population, land cover,
deforestation, protected areas, biodiversity and priority areas. He concluded mentioning that
some of the information would help to complement the integration of ELSA.
Following the lightning presentations, participants discussed what data is needed to monitor the
10 priority policy targets identified above. The full results of the data hackathon are available
here.
During this discussion, the participants mentioned the following potential data sources:
General Policy
Target Proposed Priority
thematic Document Theme Types of data
No. Targets
category Name
Biomass Energy
Presentation
The second part of the presentation included a demonstration of some of the main features of
the UN Biodiversity Lab. In this part, presented by Di Zhang, participants learned how to connect
to the platform, display vector, polygon, and raster data, and use features such as the geospatial
intersection tool. Through this presentation, participants learned how, without any prior GIS
experience, they can make progress in the UN Biodiversity Lab, using its mapping capabilities to
create and implement targeted conservation and sustainable development policies.
Marion Marigo,
Capacity Building & Biodiversity Senior Officer, Global Programme on Nature for Development,
UNDP
Presentation
To open the session, Marion Marigo reviewed the key steps in the ELSA process, and highlighted
the strides participants had made through their active participation in the workshop. The first
step of the ELSA process is to identify policy priorities, which was completed during the
workshop. From the discussions during the policy hackathon, participants collaboratively
identified 10 priority policy targets that they would like the ELSA analysis to help achieve in
Liberia.
The workshop also helped to make substantial progress on the second step of the ELSA process
around identifying global and national spatial data. During the data hackathon, participants
identified a wealth of national data that can be used to map Liberia’s 10 priority policy targets
from key custodians including the National Forest Authority, Environmental Protection Agency,
Forest Development Authority, Conservation International, UNDP Country Office, Liberia
Hydrological Services, Ministry of Mine and Energy, and Liberia Rural Renewable Energy Agency.
Moving forward, the consultant hired to support the project will work with the core team to
secure access to these data for the second iteration.
Steps 3 and 4 of the ELSA process are around creating heat maps that initially identify
opportunities for nature, climate change, and sustainable development in Liberia. An initial draft
of these opportunity maps were launched for the first time during the workshop, and the science
team will work to create a second iteration of these maps that reflect the policy priorities
identified during the workshop, and are created using national data sources.
The workshop supported strong advancements around the fifth step of the ELSA process,
defining where and how nature-based actions can be taken in the country. During the data
hackathon, participants identified that, in addition to the nature-based actions of protect,
manage, and restore in Liberia, the analysis should focus on the rehabilitation of lands to support
human well-being. This will also be incorporated into the second iteration of the analysis. Further
work to address the mapping of hard and soft constraints will be undertaken by the Project Core
Team and the science team.
Step 9 is around the implementation and monitoring of results. After the ELSA maps are finalized,
UNDP will work with project partners to explore how they can integrate these maps into projects
on the ground.
The tenth and final step of the process is around communication. Throughout this year and the
next, UNDP will work with the Project Core Team to showcase Liberia’s work in key international
venues and through articles and blogs. Marion Marigo emphasized the iterative nature of the
process, and the ability to continue to build on national expertise to refine the ELSA process to
meet Liberia’s unique national needs.
Next steps
The four-day consultation was a unique opportunity to engage diverse stakeholders from Liberia
and around the world in a dialogue on the use of spatial data for nature, climate, and sustainable
development. They also served as a key mechanism for building national capacity on how
systematic conservation planning approaches, nature-based actions, and mapping of critical life
support areas can support strategic and resource-efficient planning for ecosystem stewardship and
sustainable development in Liberia.
Input on the necessary spatial data and key policies gathered through the policy and data
hackathon will inform future action. UNDP, UNDP CO, and the EPA, will advance the project with
input from an international scientific advisory committee and, at critical stages in the process, the
project will share progress with the wider group, seeking advice from relevant ministries and
agencies in further consultations. These consultations for the Mapping Nature for People and
Planet in Liberia project served to introduce the ELSA project, define priorities, discover relevant
data layers, and build national capacity in spatial data.
Over the next six months, UNDP, UNDP CO, and the EPA will continue their collaboration to
produce and use a final ELSA map in Liberia.
Starting with the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), who
provided the funds to undertake this project in Liberia.
Abraham Tumbey, Programme Coordinator at UNDP CO Liberia, who have provided valuable
guidance and insight to develop and implement this project in Liberia; Emmanuel Olatunji,
UNOPS consultant, who followed all the details of the organization of the workshop, took
notes and provided technical feedback, and Kulee Keculah, our spatial expert, who is
essential in collecting and consolidating the spatial data for this project.
We are grateful for the support at the highest level at UNDP and we thank Stephen
Rodrigues, Resident Representative in Liberia, for his support in the project, and a big thank
you to Louis Kuukpen, Deputy Resident Representative, UNDP CO Liberia for having been
with us at the beginning of the consultation.
We are also immensely grateful for the support of the Environmental Protection Agengy,
with special thanks to Berexford Jallah, Hawa Walker, Z. Elijah Whapoe, Jefferson Nyandibo
and J. S. Datuama Cammue, from the EPA, who have supported this project in the past
weeks. And of course, we give our thanks as well to Randall M. Dobayou II, Deputy Executive
Director, EPA, for his presentation on the national vision on the first day.
We also want to acknowledge Jamison Ervin for creating this vision and inspiring us to
explore how it could serve Liberia, and to Oscar Venter, Scott Atkinson, Di Zhang, all spatial
experts, who have led the creation of rigorous scientific methods to make this possible.
Casandra Llosa and Marion Marigo, from UNDP, who have led the preparation and
facilitation of this consultation.
Annie Virnig, Enrique Paniagua, Julie Courtehoux, and Andres Rosas Ramirez, from UNDP, for
their support with the logistics and policy analysis.
Daniel Perez and Patrick Fernandew for their support in developing and updating the
workshop page.
The national presenters: Thomas L. Davis, Whymah M. Goyangator and Berexford Jallah.
And last but definitely not least, many thanks to all the participants for sharing their time and
knowledge to shape the project to meet Liberia’s needs.
Aknowledgement 29