Are you struggling with the daunting task of writing a thesis on an automated voting system?

You're
not alone. Crafting a comprehensive and insightful thesis on such a complex topic can be incredibly
challenging. From conducting extensive research to analyzing data and formulating arguments, the
process can be overwhelming for even the most seasoned academic.

Navigating through the intricacies of automated voting systems requires a deep understanding of
technology, politics, and ethics. It involves delving into the technical aspects of how these systems
function, while also considering the broader implications they have on democracy, security, and
public trust.

Furthermore, synthesizing existing literature, gathering empirical evidence, and drawing meaningful
conclusions can be time-consuming and mentally taxing. It's easy to feel lost or stuck in the midst of
such a demanding academic endeavor.

But fear not, there is a solution. ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ offers professional thesis writing services
specifically tailored to your needs. Our team of experienced writers understands the complexities of
the subject matter and can provide you with expert guidance and support every step of the way.

By entrusting your thesis to ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔, you can alleviate the stress and uncertainty
associated with the writing process. Our writers will work closely with you to develop a well-
researched, compelling thesis that meets your academic requirements and exceeds your expectations.

Don't let the challenges of writing a thesis on an automated voting system hold you back. Order from
⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ today and take the first step towards academic success.
Regardless of the area, politics, trade, advocacy, education or service, which will be popular among
people associated with their work, will be successful. Generally, end-to-end systems provide the
voter with some kind of assurance that his vote was recorded-as-intended (ballot casting assurance)
in the form of encrypted proof receipts. In most cases where polling place voting machines that
relied on the Internet for operation were used turnout did not increase. Any change in the certified
software will cause the two hashes to be distinct. As a result, over 100,000 paperless DRE voting
machines have already been deployed which lack the ability to produce a voter-verified paper ballot.
This is especially true for remote Internet voting and telephone voting given that ballots can be cast
from any computer with an Internet connection or any working telephone. Even the final placement
of the list of candidates on the balloting unit is not known till the last day of withdrawal of
nomination before elections, so tampering with machines is virtually an impossible task. In a
demonstration at the University of Michigan, scientists used this kind of hacking in the context of an
EVM, where they used a specifically designed chip that was physically plugged into its control unit.
It also reduces the paper work and eliminates the manual counting process. In ancient Athenian
polity, there used to be different methods of voting. Most paper ballots cast are tabulated by optical
scanners in the U.S., though there a significant number of jurisdictions that count paper ballots cast
at polling places manually. Most jurisdictions use different voting systems for these different voting
stages. Don’t dodge the problem present your opinion particularly and precisely. Any replacement
equipment should be subject to the same testing and certification processes as equipment initially
installed in the polling place. Traditional ballot auditing requires that election results in some fixed
percentage of precincts be reconfirmed by a hand count—though the details of actual
implementation can reduce the value of the audit (election administrators should not, for example,
always audit the same precincts). It is possible to have electronic voting without electronic counting
and electronic counting without electronic voting. Meeting the second requirement is discouragingly
challenging even at the conceptual level. In the scheme, they only protect personal privacy but also
increase the security of the voting procedure. Two separate studies commissioned by Maryland (the
SAIC and RABA reports) confirmed many of those findings and identified additional vulnerabilities.
Such challenges are not beyond solution, but to date remain significant. However, even this approach
may be subject to attack via the internet, especially if encryption and verification are not sufficient.
The mere existence of that possibility precludes the establishment of a certain chain-of-custody—the
two are mutually exclusive. Conducting secure and credible Internet elections will require substantial
scientific advances. A red lamp signals to the voters that the vote is cast. India only uses microchips
from manufacturers in US or Japan as India does not have the capability of producing microchips
within the country. Consequently, the components of the protocol increase notably. Punchcards were
used first in the 1964 Presidential election. Once a valid key press (voting process) is complete, until
another ballot enabling key press is made there will not be any activity between the CU and the BU.
After reception of the vote by the system, the vote is temporarily stored on the Vote Forwarding
Server. There is a double randomization process which makes it impossible for any person to know
which machine will be used in what constituency, this is done to safeguard that machines are not pre-
programmed to cast ballots in favour of a particular candidate.
An Ohio study of the four major voting machines has shown them all to have serious security
vulnerabilities. The Myers Automatic Booth Lever Voting Machine, designed by Jacob H.
Information has value, especially in today’s world. In common usage now, however, “electronic
voting” refers to DRE voting systems most often utilizing touch-screens as well as electronic panels
with push buttons or pointing devices to record votes. It would hold special appeal for military
personnel overseas, whose ability to vote is a growing concern. It is a continual participative
operation, not a cataclysmic, periodic exercise. System Presentation and Proposal of the Evoting
Process. Once for allocation of machines to assembly constituencies and second to polling stations in
the presence of candidates’, this means no one really knows which machine would go to what
location and hence pre-programming can be ruled out as a way of tampering. Penetration attacks
target the client or server directly while DoS attacks target service and interrupt the communication
link between the two. The synchronous collaboration tools include forums and virtual white-colored
boards. Blackboard.com offers other functionalities just like a calendar for personal time
management and electronic blackboard for taking notes. Use of good tools must go hand-in-hand
with good use of tools. Further, electronic voting and counting technologies should endeavor to
maximize the accessibility of the voting system for persons with disabilities and minority language
groups, and must not disenfranchise others. As the United States grew and the electorate expanded
in the decades following the Civil War, improvements appeared in the form of the Australian or
blanket ballot (which listed the names of all candidates), and ballot boxes with new security features.
The Internet Education System will harness existing tools within the ACS to produce applying the
system’s current abilities in education and extend it with increased specific functionalities which are
unique to education, such as the administration of internet classes, new tools for academic
collaboration and mechanism for effective Web-based teaching. Because these machines are seldom
networked, they are less likely to be disrupted or corrupted, but they do require that someone
program the system to record the results and that the results be captured in a systematic and secure
way. The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be
expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall
be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.”. According to a South Asia Monitor
report, 70% of polling booths in Bihar were declared sensitive or hypersensitive — a euphemism for
areas prone to violence. The city of Takoma Park, Maryland used Scantegrity II for its November,
2009 election. The ECI seems to have chosen the sample size arbitrarily when, in fact, its selection
should have been grounded in standard statistical sampling theory. Another argument is that
politicians would not go for e-voting over the dearly-known paper ballot ritual, which has been
“accurately modeled from decades of polling and analysis”. Kiosk Voting Machines could be located
in convenient locations such as malls, libraries and schools. What are the implications when a public
network project is conceived and implemented in the interests of corporate actors without
consideration for the needs and interests of millions of illiterate people unaccustomed to even
traditional voting methods, let alone electronic systems? In what ways, if at all, might an e-voting
strategy be conceived which serves the democratic vision of citizens in less developed countries.
Also, don’t clutter your thesis with expressions for example “for meInch or “within this essay I’ll
reason that. “. Checks and balances are in place to ensure that it is accessible to authorized personnel
only. This can be done using an optical scan voting system, punched card system or DRE voting
machine. Others have also suggested publishing voting machine software under a free software
license as is done in Australia. The earliest elections were conducted by voice vote or with paper
ballots put into ballot boxes. With document-based Ballot Voting Systems, ballots are counted a
second time by some form of machine. There is no reason to believe that if ballots are counted
correctly in one district, they would be counted correctly in other districts where the ballot design is
different, requires different programming, and can generate different errors. Although one of the
main objectives of utilizing technology in elections is to improve democracy through increases in
voter turnouts, in practice e-voting is seldom seen as a social utility.
Even failed attempts at interference could, if detected, cast doubt on the validity of election results
absent robust mechanisms to detect and recover from such attacks. Accordingly, Direct Recording
Electronic (DRE) Systems (like the widely used AccuVote TS developed by Premier Election
Solutions, commonly called Diebold) were introduced. Also in India, there is strong possibility of ink
thrown in ballot boxes, ballot stuffing and invalid votes in which it is impossible to figure out which
candidate’s name has been stamped. Yet among the technical experts there was unanimous
agreement that while blockchain is very useful and can contribute to improving or perhaps
eventually solving some issues with online voting, it is by no means a panacea that will magically
address problems or concerns with the technology. They are an electronic implementation of the old
mechanical lever systems. As with the lever machines, there is no ballot; the possible choices are
visible to the voter on the front of the machine. At the moment, the latest electronic voting systems
in use (particularly DRE systems, which according to Election Data Services, serves as the voting
equipment available for 38 percent of the U.S. registered voters) are receiving a great deal of
scrutiny and criticism. Also, I’ve shared your web site in my social networks. A voter’s choices are
usually presented on a screen in a similar manner to a DRE, or perhaps on a tablet. For voting
technology, these voluntary standards have historically been problematic. E-voting therefore appears
a much more appealing option. Their system is also receipt-fairness but does not allow each voter to
specify the random number. However, most political parties have been demanding that this number
should be increased by 10% to 30%. The advantages are numerous and significant, as it is more
convenient for the citizen and digital information is far more suitable for automated processing. This
study describes developmental research in terms of the traditional stages of planning, conducting,
and reporting a research project—problem definition, literature reviews, and research procedures
(link.springer.com). Descriptive research describes what the study is. It reduces human error and
increases speed while counting votes. First, the entrenched political machines of late 19th century
America learned quite quickly how to craft the laws governing the counting of votes under the rules
of the Australian ballot so that those laws favored the entrenched political machine. There is
additional opportunity for fraud in internet voting systems if voter notification cards, which contain
unique passwords required to cast a ballot, are intercepted. And every day before that people feared a
repeat of 2007 when results were delayed and violence erupted, killing 1,200 people. Some critics,
such as the group “Wij vertrouwen stemcomputers niet” (“We do not trust voting machines”), charge
that, for instance, foreign hardware could be inserted into the machine, or between the user and the
central mechanism of the machine itself, using a man in the middle attack technique, and thus even
sealing DRE machines may not be sufficient protection. The insider threat is a well-documented
issue and one of the biggest threats to organizations. The problem faced with the machines in these
countries was that they were computer controlled and connected to the network, which in turn, made
them prone to hacking and hence totally defeating the purpose. The sensors in touch screen devices
can be knocked out of alignment by shock and vibration that may occur during transport and such
touch screen machines can misinterpret a voter’s intent. It is advisable to link these benefits directly
to the performance characteristics of the equipment and the needs of the jurisdiction. However, some
Internet voting systems utilize a return code system that allows voters to verify that their vote was
received unaltered by the counting server. Even when they buy from the same vendor, they run
things differently. By examining the source code, critics argue, computer scientists could determine
that the program performs the intended task without error. On mechanical lever voting machines, the
name of each candidate or ballot issue choice is assigned a particular lever in a rectangular array of
levers on the front of the machine. There is a fundamental conflict between verification and keeping
votes anonymous. This server is the only one of the infrastructures that is directly accessible from the
internet and verifies voter eligibility before forwarding the vote to the Vote Storage Server.
Stakeholders should be involved in the design of electronic voting and counting technologies and in
public testing.
These challenges include both immediate and more long-term challenges, as shown below. The
sensors in touch screen devices can be knocked out of alignment by shock and vibration that may
occur during transport and such touch screen machines can misinterpret a voter’s intent. Attackers
have realized that it is difficult to attack secure networks, so they find easier routes, like targeting
individuals that work in organizations. People have this notion that hand-counted paper ballots are
simple in a naive way, when in fact, they are simple in an elegant way, in the optimal way. Ballot
secrecy can also be compromised since the time each vote is cast is tracked on the ledger, which
could allow for tracking or possibilities for fraud such as vote selling and voter coercion or
intimidation. Interestingly, they find that the ability of vulnerable citizens (illiterates, females,
scheduled castes and tribes) to cast their vote improved significantly after the introduction of the
EVMs. Furthermore, voters were less likely to report that they did not cast their vote due to fear of
violence or vote capture, or were prevented from voting. Some experimented with the electronic
voting system but returned to the ballot papers in the face of apprehensions. It is important that the
public retain a strong sense of confidence and trust in the electoral process and be generally
supportive of the notion of electronic voting. All that paper in standard ballots may seem old
fashioned, but it leaves a trail that votes cast, that PCs and phones can’t do. No cybersecurity expert
is willing to endorse any sort of platform or tool as secure for online voting. All that must be
accomplished without enabling the voters to prove to others how they voted. E-voting indeed
conveys different significance for different actors, and their use of the technology may depart from
different agendas. MAX232 line driver. The circuit isn't supported by us. A popular quote says that
“It’s not the people who vote that count, it’s the people who count the votes.” Elections are a
defining feature of democratic government, but all too frequently, we take the actual mechanics of
the election for granted. However, these pilots have never led to the use of DREs in the country.
Meeting the second requirement is discouragingly challenging even at the conceptual level. Since
that time, electoral systems have been designed and developed according to the characteristics of the
countries in democratic governments around the world. As troubling, voting machines themselves
can be compromised within seven minutes of direct access, with little more than a screwdriver and a
new ROM chip. Each student will be given a code, in which this will serve as their primary key to
vote. EVMs with VVPAT system ensure the accuracy of the voting system. The problem faced with
the machines in these countries was that they were computer controlled and connected to the
network, which in turn, made them prone to hacking and hence totally defeating the purpose.
However, the token or code must not allow the voter to prove to others how they have cast their
vote. One Brazilian study showed that resourceful candidates were able to garner more votes than
non-resourceful candidates in electronic voting election as compared to paper ballot election because
resourceful candidates were better able to communicate the information that electronic voters needed
to cast valid ballots than their non-resourceful counterparts. ThreeBallot is an end-to-end (E2E)
auditable voting system that can in principle be implemented on paper. This obviously has
drawbacks: paper is wasted, invalid votes, manual vote counting takes time and is potentially more
error-prone than electronic vote counting, not to mention electoral frauds. Voting systems may also
be hacked or rigged remotely over the Internet by hackers anywhere in the world. Thus, the
electronic ballot records stored in those memory circuits are completely invisible to and unverified by
the voter; they are also alterable. The key to democracy is not in the winning and taking power, it is
in the counting, the losing and the acceptance of that result. By utilizing the right of the voting,
people elect their most suitable leader who will lead them. The machine creates social networks of
college, students, staff, and alumni at Sloan and offers mechanisms for interaction and collaboration
among people of those communities.