Introduction to Roofing Systems

Course No: T04-001

Credit: 4 PDH

J. Paul Guyer, P.E., R.A., Fellow ASCE, Fellow AEI

Continuing Education and Development, Inc.

22 Stonewall Court
Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677

P: (877) 322-5800
[email protected]
 An Introduction
to Roofing Systems

Guyer Partners J. Paul Guyer, P.E., R.A.

44240 Clubhouse Drive
El Macero, CA 95618 Paul Guyer is a registered civil engineer,
(530)7758-6637 mechanical engineer, fire protection engineer,
[email protected] and architect with over 35 years experience in
the design of buildings and related
infrastructure. For an additional 9 years he
was a senior-level advisor to the California
Legislature. He is a graduate of Stanford
University and has held numerous national,
state and local positions with the American
Society of Civil Engineers and National Society
of Professional Engineers.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 1

This course is adapted from the Unified Facilities Criteria of the United States government,
which is in the public domain, has unlimited distribution and is not copyrighted.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 2

 CONTENTS

1. STARTING POINTS FOR ROOF SYSTEM SELECTION

2. SELECTION CONSIDERATIONS FOR STEEP ROOFING SYSTEMS

3. SELECTION CONSIDERATIONS FOR LOW-SLOPE (MEMBRANE) ROOFING

4. RE-ROOFING AND RE-COVERING

5. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

6. DETAILED INFORMATION

7. USING PRINCIPAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF

POSSIBLE ROOF SYSTEMS

8. CONSIDERATIONS WHEN SPECIFYING LOW-SLOPE (HYDROSTATIC)

MEMBRANE ROOFING

9. PRINCIPAL CONSIDERATIONS WHEN SPECIFYING STEEP-SLOPE

(WATERSHEDDING) ROOFING

10. ADDITIONAL CRITERIA AND DISCUSSION

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 3

1. STARTING POINTS FOR ROOF SYSTEM SELECTION. This Chapter is intended to
introduce the major considerations in selecting a roofing system. Figure 1 depicts the
various alternative roofing systems and how they relate. When commencing the
selection process there are two different starting points.

Material and Roofing System Options

Figure 1

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 4

1.1 New vs. Reroofing. The roof may be part of a new building design; or, it may
involve the reroofing of an existing structure (replacement or re-cover). Today,
approximately 75% of roofing activity is reroofing.

1.2 Steep-Slope vs. Low-Slope. In new construction the designer is very likely to have
a preconceived notion as to whether a highly visible sloped-roof is wanted, or whether a
less visible low-slope roof design is acceptable. Positive drainage is a very important
design criterion. When reroofing, it may be feasible to improve drainage by using
tapered insulation or sloped deck fills.

2. SELECTION CONSIDERATIONS FOR STEEP ROOFING SYSTEMS. Table 1

evaluates common steep roofing systems based upon some use criteria.

2.1 Aesthetics. Steep roof systems make a strong visible statement about a building.
The texture, shadow-line, and color are major factors in selection.

2.2 Minimum Slope Requirements. Steep roofs function by shedding water rather
than by being waterproof (Figure 2). Minimum slopes as shown in Table 13, are
required in order to insure proper drainage.

2.3 Categories of Steep Roofing. Major categories of steep roofing include asphalt
shingles, wood shingles and shakes, tile, slate, architectural metal, asphalt roll roofing,
and fabricated units of metal or plastic intended to look like the others. Only asphalt roll
roofing and asphalt or wood shingles may be re-covered.

2.4 Snowshedding and Ventilation. Sloped roofs are effective snowshedders. In

addition, the attic space that accompanies steep roofing makes it easy to ventilate the
roofing system.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 5

 Steep Roofing (hydrokinetic)
Figure 2

Low-Slope (hydrostatic)
Figure 3

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 6

2.5 Maintenance Requirements. Sloped roofs in general, require less maintenance
than flat roofing systems.

2.6 Steep Roof Conversions. When considering reroofing a flat roof, it may be
possible to convert the low-slope roofing system to a steeply sloped roof. This may
improve the appearance of the building while resolving drainage problems as well.
Steep roof conversions are a viable option for relatively narrow buildings.

Steep Slope Selection Based Upon Use Criteria

Table 1

3. SELECTION CONSIDERATIONS FOR LOW-SLOPE (MEMBRANE) ROOFING.

Membrane roofing is typically used on commercial buildings where the minimum slopes
required by steep roofing render them impractical for larger buildings. Low-slope
membrane systems are completely sealed at laps and flashings (Figure 3) and can
temporarily resist standing water conditions. Choices for membrane roofing include
multi-ply bituminous built-up (BUR), polymer-modified bituminous (MB), elastomeric

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 7

single-ply systems (e.g., EPDM), thermoplastic single-ply systems (e.g., PVC or TPO),
sprayed-in-place polyurethane foam (SPF), and some metal (hydrostatic/low-
slope/SSSMR) systems. Designers frequently select low-slope roofs when the roof is
expected to accommodate rooftop equipment. With the exception of foam and metal, all
low-slope systems can be incorporated into Protected Membrane Roof (PMR) designs.

4. REROOFING AND RE-COVERING.

4.1 Reroofing. The term replacement is used when the existing roofing system is to be
either partially or totally removed and a new system installed. The designer should
consider any existing problems and whether drainage and thermal performance needs
to be improved. Existing surfaces such as walls and curbs may be contaminated with
bitumen, which might affect compatibility with some reroofing options. Additional
concerns (as compared to new roofing) include whether the existing structure can
handle a significantly heavier roof system and whether construction activities of the
reroof system will affect the occupants of the building (i.e., fumes, falling debris, and
noise).

4.2 Re-cover. The term re-cover is used when a new roofing system is to be
superimposed directly over an existing system. In this case, underlying conditions are
obscured making assessment of their condition more difficult. Additional concerns
include how the re-cover system will be attached to the existing membrane or roof deck,
and compatibility with the substrate. The potential for trapped water between the old
and new membrane may suggest the use of venting base sheets and/or roof vents.

5. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES. A relatively new design criterion is whether the roof

system under consideration meets green criteria, such as whether the system
incorporates postconsumer waste or is itself recyclable at the end of its useful life. Roof
system waste is bulky and puts a great strain on waste disposal sites. Energy efficiency
is also important in terms of raw materials acquired, production of finished goods, and
application of the roof system. Thermal performance in service and retention of thermal

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 8

value with age are equally important. A sustainable or robust roof is highly desirable as
extension of the life of the roof contributes to overall conservation. High albedo
(reflective) roofs may improve localized climate conditions. The felt used in asphalt
organic shingles consists primarily of recycled wastepaper, wood chips, and sawdust.
Asphalt itself is a by-product of petroleum refining. Wood fiber and perlite roof insulation
contain waste paper. Glass fiber and asphalt organic shingles have been recycled into
asphalt curbing and the like. Wood shingles and shakes can be recycled into garden
mulch. Steel and aluminum contain recycled scrap and at the end of their life, metal
panels can be recycled back into scrap. Tables 2 and 3 compare environmental
considerations for steep and low-slope roofing systems.

Preserving the Environment – Steep Roofing

Table 2

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 9

 Preserving the Environment – Low-Slope Roofing
Table 3

6. DETAILED INFORMATION. Once a tentative roofing system selection has been

made using information provided by this discussion.

7. USING PRINCIPAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF

POSSIBLE ROOF SYSTEMS.

7.1 Principal Design Considerations. Tables 4 and 5 list some of the principal design
considerations in roof system selection. An explanation of the headings follows the
tables. These tables are not all-inclusive but contain many criteria that the designer can
consider to reduce the myriad of choices. Systems that fail to meet the principal project

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 10

design criteria can be quickly disqualified from further consideration. For example, if an
existing structure has reached its design load limit, then heavier roofs (such as ballasted
single-ply roofs or concrete tiles) would have to be disqualified (or the structure would
have to be strengthened at significant cost).

Principal Design Considerations—Steep Roofing

Table 4

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 11

 Principal Design Considerations—Low-Slope Roofing
Table 5

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 12

7.2 Discussion of Headers in Tables 4 and 5.

7.2.1 Initial Cost. This may include materials, labor, and special set-up for
construction.
Initial cost may determine if the roof, as designed, is affordable. Perhaps a somewhat
less expensive system should be considered if it does not incur significantly increased
maintenance costs or have a shortened life.

7.2.2 Life Cycle Cost. LCC considers durability but also presumes that routine
maintenance will be performed to achieve the projected life. Consider whether the
building is temporary or permanent. It would be hard to justify an expensive copper or
slate roof on a building scheduled for demolition in the near future. Also consider the
mission of the building. There are levels of quality in many systems. For example, while
45 mil EPDM is the standard, for little extra cost 90 mil material with greater puncture
resistance, or conversion to a PMR system, could be specified for a building with a
critical mission.

7.2.3 Construction Difficulty. Some systems require more clearance to accommodate

application methods and equipment. Large prefabricated roof sheets (i.e., 50 ft. by 200
ft.) may be fine on a large roof with few penetrations, but are impractical on a roof area
that is broken up by many curbs and equipment supports. On multiple penetration
surfaces, relatively narrow sheets (e.g., BUR, MB, thermoplastic single-ply) or sprayed-
in-place polyurethane foam should be considered. Penetrations through standing seam
metal roofing need to accommodate the expected thermal movement of the metal
panels. Thermal movement is cumulative, increasing with distance from the point where
the panels are restrained (typically the eaves). Penetrations in SSSMR panels must
pass through the flat portion of the panel, not through the standing seam. Penetrations
wider than a single panel require a diverter to carry water around the obstruction. Water
must flow parallel to the raised seams, never over them.

7.2.4 Periodic Maintenance—(The need for periodic maintenance and difficulty of

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 13

inspection or maintenance.) Some roof systems require periodic recoating for weather
protection. Aggregate surfaced roofs are more difficult to inspect and patch than
smooth surfaced roofs.

7.2.5 Life Expectancy. A mean life is listed but the actual life is affected by drainage,
maintenance, and extreme use or abuse.

7.2.6 Suitability in Severe Cold. Effects of freeze-thaw, hail, ice scrubbing, and traffic
while cold (i.e., snow removal) is considered. Some materials embrittle dramatically at
low temperatures (i.e., have a relatively high glass transition temperature); others may
embrittle as they weather and lose plasticizer or are degraded by UV or thermal load. H
indicates highly suitable; L indicates less suitable.

7.2.7 Suitability in Extremely Hot or Humid Conditions. Effects of thermal

expansion and algae growth are considered. H indicates more suitable, L indicates less
suitable.

7.2.8 Wind Resistance. Roofs are vulnerable to wind scour and blow-off. While
arbitrary ratings are provided here, the resistance is affected by building height, terrain,
parapet height and measures taken to upgrade perimeter and corner attachment. H
indicates highly wind resistant (when properly designed). For membrane roofing,
impermeable roof decks such as cast-in-place concrete are best. Air retarders are
needed with loose laid and mechanically fastened single-ply systems as they may
otherwise balloon from interior air leakage. Perimeter wood blocking must be well
anchored to prevent peeling of the membrane or loss of fascia metal. Avoid the use of
small aggregate (e.g., pea gravel) near tarmacs and on skyscrapers due to the damage
it can cause if blown off the roof by high wind. Asphalt shingles may require manual
application of tab adhesive. Interlocking asphalt shingles provide excellent wind
resistance. Metal panel systems are wind resistant only when all components including
clips, fasteners, and secondary structural members are installed as wind-tested. SPF

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 14

has outstanding resistance to wind and to wind-blown missiles. SPF roofs performed
well in hurricane Andrew, especially when they were spray-applied
directly to concrete roof decks.

7.2.9 Resistance to Ponding Water. Membrane roof systems rely upon sealed seams
to resist hydrostatic pressure. Water absorption may result in root or algae growth or
cause rot. H infers highly resistant to these conditions.

7.2.10 Traffic Wear Resistance. Roofs that have a lot of rooftop equipment will have
foot traffic that can cause punctures or abrasion. Most roof systems are available with
traffic protective overlayers, such as walkways. H indicates highly resistant to abuse
assuming protective courses have been used.

7.2.11 Resistance to Chemicals (resistance to oils, fats, grease, metal ions).

Some roof surfaces are vulnerable to exhausted fumes or liquids. Thermoplastic
polyolefins (TPO’s) and Hypalon® (CSPE) may be better than bituminous materials in
resistance to oils, greases, and solvents. Copper-containing runoff water from
condensate coils or flashings will corrode zinc and zinc-aluminum SSSMR roofing. H
indicates better than average resistance to attack.

7.3 Weight Factor. Consider the total number of roofs already installed, the weight of
the proposed roof system possible, and construction loads. The unit weight of
membrane systems vary dramatically, ranging from less than 0.5 psf for a 2 in.
thickness of SPF, to more than 20 psf for ballasted single-ply systems. Typical roof
system weights and construction loads are shown in Table 6.

7.4 Compliance with Fire & Wind Requirements. Roofing systems are rated as
entire systems, including the roof deck, method of attachment to the deck (e.g.,
fasteners, hot bitumen, cold adhesives), vapor retarder (if used), thermal insulation, roof
membrane, and surfacing. Typical External Fire Ratings (ASTM E-108, Class A, B or C)
are shown in Tables 7 and 8. Combustible decks (wood/plywood/OSB) require selected

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 15

combinations of underlayments, insulation, roofing, and surfacing to resist burning
brands and intermittent flame as described in ASTM E108.

7.5 Roof Decking. Principle roof decks for membrane roofing include steel, cast-in-
place concrete, precast concrete, wood, plywood, OSB, and structural wood fiber.
Variations of cast-in-place concrete include lightweight structural concrete (typically
1680 kg/m3)(105 psf) and lightweight insulating concrete(480 kg/m3)(30 psf). In new
design, the roof deck is generally selected based upon construction considerations and
materials. Steel is by far the most popular, followed by concrete and plywood/OSB.
Table 9 lists some criteria for deck selection for new construction. Table 9 lists methods
of attachment to the roof deck. Attachment options include full adhesion, mechanical
fastening, and loose-laid/ballasted roofing. Steel decking requires a
bridging course typically mechanically fastened roof insulation. For steep roofing,
plywood and OSB roof decks are most common. They generally utilize flexible batts as
underdeck roof insulation although architectural metal and cathedral ceiling
constructions may use rigid insulation above the deck.

7.6 Suitability of the Membrane for the Substrate. Table 10 lists some possible
combinations.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 16

 Typical Weights of Material and Equipment
Table 6

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 17

Fire Ratings and Required Underlayments for Steep-Sloped Roof Systems
Table 7

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 18

Fire Ratings and Required Underlayments for Low-Slope Roof Systems
Table 8

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 19

 Suitability of the Roof Deck for Various Conditions
Table 9

Membrane/Substrate Compatibility/Attachment Methods

Table 10

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 20

7.7 Thermal Insulation. Rigid thermal insulations used under membrane roofing
include wood fiber, perlite fiber, glass fiber, foamed glass, polystyrene (extruded or
expanded), and polyisocyanurate (isoboards). Non-structural thermal insulations include
glass fiber and mineral wool batts, blown loose insulations such as cellulose fiber, glass
fiber, mineral fiber, and expanded vermiculite. Table 11 indicates suitability of rigid roof
insulations for membrane roofing based upon intended method of use.

Suitability of Roof Insulation for Method of Use

Table 11

7.7.1 Thickness of Insulation. If thick layers of insulation are needed to meet a high
therm resistance, thicker wood nailers and deeper fascia metal will be required. Foam
plastics such as polyisocyanurate and polystyrene have the highest R values per unit
thickness.

7.7.2 Clearance of Metal Panels. In standing seam metal roof systems, the
permissible thickness of blanket insulation may be limited by the clearance provided by
the supporting clip design.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 21

7.7.3 Insulated Attic. Blanket insulation used in steep roofing systems is frequently
placed on the floor of the attic where R-values of 30 (RSI = 5.4) or more may be
possible (Figure 13).

7.7.4 Ceiling Insulation. Dropped ceilings are sometimes insulated by placing batts
directly above the ceiling panels. This practice is not recommended as subsequent
access to underdeck equipment or phone wires is blocked. When the insulation is
displaced to gain access it is rarely put back in place correctly, if at all.

7.8 Suitability for Extreme Climates. Protected membrane systems (PMRs) are very
well suited to extremely cold climates and have been successfully used in all climates.
For extreme conditions of snow and ice, a cold (ventilated) roof should be considered.
For most steep roofing this is achieved by allowing a flow of outdoor air between the
insulation and the roofing system. This air cools the roof in summer, dries out any
moisture that condenses in the roof, and greatly reduces the formation of icicles and ice
dams along eaves. For regions prone to severe hail, ballasted EPDM roofs are very
good and PMRs are excellent. Tiles, shingles, bare BUR, and metal systems are easily
damaged by hail. In regions of semitropical climate (high temperatures and humidity),
asphalt shingles should be treated to be fungus resistant and wood shakes/shingles
should be pressure treated for rot resistance.

7.9 Installation in Cold or Wet Weather. Most membrane systems are difficult to
install in subfreezing weather. If frequent precipitation during construction is a problem,
factory fabricated single-ply systems with field welded seams may have advantages
over systems where field application of adhesives or hot bitumen is needed. Torch
applied modified bitumens are one of the few systems that can be applied, albeit slowly,
in wet windy conditions.

7.10 Warranties. The NRCA Commercial Low-Slope Roofing Materials Guide contains
a comprehensive side-by-side comparison of commercial roof warranties. The roofing

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 22

industry offers two general types of warranties: Materials Only and Materials &
Workmanship. Carefully read exclusions and limits. Note: The longest warranties are
not necessarily the best, nor does the length of the warranty directly relate to roof
durability. In many cases, manufacturers may restrict their warranties.

7.11 Maintenance Considerations. Sloped roofs require less routine maintenance

and may be preferred when the facilities management is incapable of providing routine
inspections and minor repairs. Modified bituminous and BUR systems may be superior
in abuse resistance to thin single-ply systems. Various protection boards/walkways can
be used around equipment where traffic is anticipated. Protected membrane roof
systems (PMR’s) are abuse resistant but more difficult to inspect and repair.

7.12 Roof Access, Fumes and Property Protection When Reroofing.

7.12.1 Fumes. In reroofing situations fumes from kettles and solvents may be
objectionable. Hot coal tar pitch is especially objectionable; hot asphalt is also
noticeable but less noxious. Cold applied systems with taped or welded seams and
metal roof systems generate few odors. It may be necessary to coordinate air-
conditioning shutdown to avoid taking fumes into the occupied building.

7.12.2 Ease of Construction Access. If the area around the construction site is
congested it may make heating and hoisting of roofing materials difficult.

7.12.3 Specifying Construction Procedures. Site access, material storage area,

layout area, building and landscape protection should be identified on drawings.

7.12.4 Safety and Disturbance to Occupants. The presence of occupants, vehicles,

and pedestrians may be of concern. Reroofing is noisy. Dust and overspray may affect
those nearby.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 23

7.13 Installation. Roofing requires skilled installers. Qualified contractors and
inspectors are more likely to be available if the system is customarily used in the region.
It should be determined whether there are several manufacturer-approved installers
capable of bidding the work.

7.14 Owner Preferences. Verify that the contemplated system is acceptable to the
owner, occupants, and maintenance personnel.

8. CONSIDERATIONS WHEN SPECIFYING LOW-SLOPE (HYDROSTATIC)

MEMBRANE ROOFING. With the exception of SSSMR, membrane roofing requires a
suitable roof deck. Most constructions will also use thermal insulation. Vapor retarders
are sometimes required to protect the roofing system from attack by interior moisture.

8.1 Built-up Roofing (BUR). BUR Consists of multiple reinforcements such as asphalt
treated glass or organic felt laminated together with hot-applied bitumen (asphalt or coal
tar pitch) or cold adhesives (Figure 4). Surfacings include aggregate, coatings,
capsheets, and sprayed roofing granules. A typical system includes thermal insulation
and may include a vapor retarder.

Typical BUR System

Figure 4

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 24

b. Polymer Modified Bitumen. MB consists of reinforcing sheets factory-coated with
polymer modified bitumen. They may be laminated in the field using hot bitumen, heat
fusion, or by cold adhesives (Figure 5). Surfacings include capsheets with mineral
granules, metal foil, and field applied coatings.

Polymer-Modified Cap Sheet Adhered to Mechanically Fastened Base Sheet

Figure 5

c. Elastomeric (Single-Ply) Membranes. Elastomeric membranes consist of a factory

produced sheet generally of EPDM rubber with seams field-sealed with adhesive or
tape (Figure 6). Sheets are unsurfaced unless ballast is used. Elastomers are
vulcanized (thermoset), and usually non-reinforced except when used in mechanically
fastened systems. A fleece-backed sheet is also available for fully adhered systems
when it is desired to use hot bitumen as an adhesive (e.g., for re-covering an asphalt-
contaminated deck or old BUR).

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 25

 EPDM Roof System
Figure 6

PVC Roof System

Figure 7

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 26

8.4 Weldable Thermoplastic Membranes. These membranes consist of a sheet of
reinforced thermoplastic material such as PVC or TPO. Sheets are unsurfaced or
ballasted. Seams are generally heat fused although solvent welding and adhesive
bonding are also possible (Figure 7).

8.5 Structural Standing Seam Metal Roofing. SSSMR consists of metal panels with
raised seams more than 1-1/2 in. high (Figure 8). Sealants are utilized at side seams
and endlaps to provide waterproofing. Most are considered hydrostatic, resisting
standing snow and occasional ponding. Caution: ridges and valleys of a SSSMR may
not be as watertight as the seams.

Structural Standing Seam Metal Roofing

Figure 8

8.6 Sprayed-in-Place Polyurethane Foam. SPF is a thermoset rigid foam, field-

formed by the reaction of liquid components (in the presence of a foaming agent)
sprayed onto the substrate. SPF is protected by liquid-applied elastomeric coatings or
an application of loose gravel (on slopes < 4%).

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 27

 Components of Membrane Roofing System
Figure 9

8.7 Components of Membrane Roofing Systems (Figure 9).

8.7.1 The deck supports roofing loads and is selected to conform to fire resistant
design classifications. Not all systems require a deck (e.g., structural standing seam
metal roofing).

8.7.2 A vapor retarder protects the insulation against moisture vapor attack from the
warm, high vapor pressure side of the roof assembly. Not all buildings require a vapor
retarder.

8.7.3 An air barrier prevents air movement (infiltration or exfiltration) through the
roofing system.

8.7.4 Thermal insulation provides thermal resistance and prevents condensation on

components beneath the insulation. It also furnishes support and a smooth, continuous
substrate for the membrane.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 28

8.7.5 The membrane is intended to keep water out of the components below (as well
as out of the building). The membrane system affects fire resistance.

8.7.6 Individual roofing components may be held in place by adhesives, fasteners,

ballast, or a combination of these methods.

8.7.7 Perimeter flashings are waterproof vertical terminations of the membrane

(perimeter flashing) (Figure 10).

Wall Base and Cap Flashing

Figure 10

8.7.8 Roof edging and fascia are usually low profile roof edge terminations and side
trim.

8.7.9 Roof penetrations include drains, vents, curbs, equipment supports, and the
like.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 29

8.7.10 Surfacing materials screen UV light, improve fire ratings, and may improve
water and/or hail resistance.

8.8 Attachment for Low-Slope Roof Systems.

8.8.1 Full Anchorage. For relatively inelastic roof membranes such as BUR and MB,
solid adhesion helps restrain the roof membrane and uniformly distribute thermal
stresses. When insulation is used, it is fastened or adhered to the deck. The membrane
is fully adhered to the thermal insulation using hot asphalt or cold adhesive.
Polyurethane foam is sprayed directly to the substrate, especially in re-cover of existing
BUR thereby being fully adhered as well.

8.8.2 Partial Attachment. In partially attached systems the membrane is mechanically

anchored through the insulation into the deck, or in a few cases, partially adhered with
strips or spots of adhesive. This is common with flexible single-ply roof membranes.
Fasteners are typically placed in the seams area where by can be covered by the
overlapping sheet.

8.8.3 Loose-Laid Attachment. For loose-laid systems the membrane is unattached to

the substrate and is held in place by ballast. Restraint is required only at perimeters and
curbs. Loose-laid roofs are used with elastomeric (EPDM) and some thermoplastic
(e.g., TPO) systems. These are very inexpensive roof systems if the structure can
handle the ballast weight.
Caution:
In positive pressure buildings air barriers should be used
with loose laid and partially attached membranes to avoid
billowing and peeling.

8.9 Labor.

8.9.1 Highly Intensive: BUR, MB

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 30

8.9.2 Moderately Intensive: SSSMR—The system is very unforgiving of installation
defects.

8.9.3 Medium Intensity: Fully adhered and mechanically fastened single-ply.

8.9.4 Low Intensity: Spray Foam requires the smallest crew (but is the most machine
intensive and weather sensitive).

8.10 Slope.

Some Typical Slope Limitations for Low-Slope Roof Systems

Table 2-12

9. PRINCIPAL CONSIDERATIONS WHEN SPECIFYING STEEP-SLOPE

(WATERSHEDDING) ROOFING. This category covers systems that range from asphalt
shingles, wood shingles and shakes, clay and concrete tile, slate, and metal look-a-
likes. Also included are architectural metal panels with a variety of seams (Figure 11).
Slopes are generally 25% (3:12) or greater. Most must be continuously supported on a
solid deck (e.g., plywood or oriented strand board [OSB]). However, some varieties
(e.g., clay and concrete tiles) may be supported on spaced horizontal batten boards.
Underlayments such as roofing felt, self-adhering MB or plastic film are usually required
over the entire roof to provide a secondary line of defense against driving rain and
blowing snow. In cold regions, a completely sealed MB underlayment is needed along

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 31

eaves, in valleys, and at dormers, skylights, chimneys and such to resist leaks from
water ponded behind ice dams.

Architectural Metal Seams

Figure 11

9.1 Aesthetics. By their very nature steep roofing is highly visible. Appearance may be
of primary concern to the designer. Regional preferences exist. For example, red tile
roofing is very common and highly desirable in the Southwest, while light gray concrete
tile is preferred in Florida. Wood shakes give a textured natural look preferred in the
Pacific Northwest.

9.2 Labor Intensity and Labor Skill.

9.2.1 High Intensity. Heavy brittle units of clay, tile or slate.

9.2.2 Medium Intensity. Architectural metal, wood shakes.

9.2.3 Low Intensity. Shingles.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 32

9.3 Watershedding. Steep roofs rely on gravity to cause water to flow away from
headlaps. Recommended minimum slopes are shown in Table 13. Lower slopes are
sometime permissible by increasing overlap or enhancing the waterproofness of the
underlayment.

Minimum Slopes for Typical Steep Roofing Systems

Table 13

9.3.1 Valleys and Eaves. Valleys must be well constructed. The slope of a valley will
be less than that of the intersecting planes that form it. Exterior drainage over the roof
edge or to a gutter is typical but may be troublesome in cold regions since ice dams
may form there.

9.3.2 Underlayments. Sealed underlayments of self-adhering modified bitumen are

typically used along the eaves to at least 24” beyond the interior wall line (Figure 12a)
and as valley lining. Occasionally the entire roof deck is covered with such a membrane.
Note that this can lead to problems if indoor moisture is not isolated from the roof by
well made vapor and air barriers. Underlayments are used in steep roofing as a
secondary defense against water penetration (Figure 12b). These include No. 15 felt,

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 33

No. 30 felt, and self-adhering MB sheets. For hydrokinetic and crafted metal, self-
adhering MB sheets are essential as a secondary water barrier.

Self-Adhesive Eaves Flashing

(Underlayment is sealed from eave to 24” within wall line.)
Figure 12a

Underlayment for Steep Roofing

(Underlay felt is unsealed)
Figure 12b

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 34

9.3.3 Energy Efficiency. Steep roofs generally cover an attic space (figure 2-13) (with
the exception of cathedral ceilings). The floor of an attic can be inexpensively insulated
with nonstructural insulations such as fiberglass batts, mineral wool, expanded
vermiculite, or treated cellulose. Where the thickness of the insulation is not limited by
clearance problems, very high thermal resistances (e.g., Rsi > 5.56, R > 30) can be
achieved. If a vapor retarder is required for a cold arctic climate the retarder needs to be
placed on the interior (warm side) of the insulation. The attic space above this
insulation should be ventilated to remove moisture and to keep the attic relatively cold;
this minimizes ice damming at eaves.

Vented Attic Space

Figure 13

9.3.4 Durability. Mean durability of common steep roofing has been estimated in one
survey as:

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 35

 Mean Durability of Common Steep Roofing
Table 14

10. ADDITIONAL CRITERIA AND DISCUSSION.

10.1 Wind. Maximum wind speeds associated with locality and storm type determine
needed resistance. ANSI/ASCE 7-95 and EI01S010 provide design information.

10.1.1 Adhered Systems. Air impermeable roof decks such as poured concrete, with
adhered or mechanically fastened insulation and fully adhered membranes, are highly
wind resistant. Tests conducted by the Factory Mutual System have determined that
BUR systems installed this way have resisted 8.6 kilopascals (180 psf).

10.1.2 Metal Panel Systems. Metal panels are generally rated by the Underwriters 580
procedure, with UL 90 ratings considered excellent. However, because some SSSMR
panel systems with UL 90 ratings have failed in service, structural standing seam metal
roof systems must pass the ASTM E1592 test method.

10.1.3 Ballasted Systems. Ballasted single-ply systems rely on heavier and larger
ballast in more wind prone exposures. SPRI has developed wind guidelines in their
ANSI-SPRI RP-4 document based upon ANSI/ASCE 7-95 guidelines. Higher parapets

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 36

have a beneficial effect on ballasted systems. Above certain building heights, SPRI
recommends against the use of ballast.

10.1.4 Mechanically Fastened Systems. Mechanically fastened single-ply systems

use narrower starter sheets and increased fastener density in high wind areas.
Examples of layout can be found in Factory Mutual Loss Prevention Data Sheet 1-29.

10.1.5 Foam Systems. Sprayed-in-Place Polyurethane Foam (SPF) systems have

proven very wind resistant and are effective in protecting the structure against wind
hurled missiles.

10.1.6 Problems with Small Roof Aggregate. Roofs adjacent to airport tarmac
activities should avoid aggregate surfacing as loose aggregate may be blown off the
roof and sucked into engines. Loose stone ballast which is much larger, is used
successfully at many airports.

10.1.7 Wind Rated Roofs. Underwriters Laboratories lists wind rated systems in their
Roofing Materials and Systems Directory as Class 30, 60 or 90. Factory Mutual
Research Corporation lists wind rated systems in their Approval Guide with ratings
ranging from 60 to 210 psf.

10.1.8 Steep Roofing. For most steep roofing systems, additional fastening is required
for
high wind areas (e.g., six fasteners per asphalt shingle instead of four, addition of nose
clips for tiles, etc.).

10.2 Ice and Hail. The formation of ice can cause the roof membrane to split. Ice can
also affect roofing performance by scrubbing the membrane and eroding the surface.
This can be especially detrimental to materials with a relatively high glass transition
temperature (Tg). Bituminous materials have a Tg of approximately 32°F. Modified
bituminous materials with an SBS modifier can have a Tg as low as minus -30°F.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 37

EPDM membranes report a Tg less than -40°F. The Tg of thermoplastics may increase
with age (i.e., loss of plasticizer in PVC). Ponding promotes ice damage; drainage
avoids it.

10.2.1 Impact Damage. Falling ice, such as from overhead towers, causes impact
damage. Ballasted EPDM provides some protection. Protected membrane roofs in
which both polystyrene insulation and ballast are placed over the finished roof
membrane provide excellent impact resistance.

10.2.2 Perimeter Icing. Ice formation at eaves, scuppers, and gutters is a major design
concern. For low-slope roofing selection of internal drainage where building heat keeps
the drain lines unfrozen is recommended.

10.2.3 Minimizing Icing Problems. For metal and steep roofing heating cables are
sometimes necessary but not especially reliable. In cold regions use of a cold roof in
which the roof is ventilated to prevent formation of icicles and ice dams is preferred.
Self-adhering waterproof membranes are needed to avoid leaks from ice damming
(Figure 10).

10.2.4 Hail Damage. Weather maps are available that generally divide the U.S. into
regions that require resistance to severe hail (2 in. dia.), moderate hail (1-1/2 in. dia.),
and areas of low hail probability. Hail resistance is affected by the compressive strength
of the substrate, thickness of the membrane, tensile strength, and age/brittleness of the
material.

10.3 Snow. Snow removal operations in which shovels or snow blowers are used can
cause severe damage especially to cold, brittle membranes. Smooth single-ply
membranes and metal roofing are extremely slippery when wet or when a thin ice film
covers melt water. Roof walkways consisting of compatible materials are essential when
it is necessary to walk on wet or frozen roofs.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 38

10.3.1 Metal Roofs. TI 809-52 recommends that SSSMRs should have a minimum
slope of 8.3% in cold regions.

10.3.2 Snow Loads. Snow load information is available in ANSI/ASCE 7-95, TI 809-01,
and TI 809-52.

10.4 Slope. Drainage is essential on all roofing systems. For hydrokinetic roofing the
drainage must be positive and rapid. Shingles, tiles, and the like, generally have
industry minimum recommended slopes of 33% to 42%. Sometimes a lower slope
option is available if waterproof underlayments are used.

10.4.1 Metal Roofs. Minimum slopes for metal roofs vary from 4% to 33%, depending
upon roof type.

10.4.2 Membrane Slope. Low-slope membranes should also comply with a minimum
slope of 2% (1/4 in./ft.). Where ponding is unavoidable such as in spray ponds, a BUR
with double poured aggregate and bitumen is sometimes used. Coal tar pitch
membranes are used at slopes as low as dead level and to a maximum slope of 2%
(1/4 in/ft.). drainage is also needed. However, small puddles are inevitable as SPF is
never completely smooth. Small puddles should dry out within 24-48 hours after
inclement weather. Additional elastomeric coating is recommended where ponding is
anticipated.

10.4.3 Foam Slope. For Sprayed-in-Place Polyurethane Foam (SPF) systems positive
drainage is also needed. However, small puddles are inevitable as SPF is never
completely smooth. Small puddles should dry out within 24-48 hours after inclement
weather. Additional elastomeric coating is recommended where ponding is anticipated.

10.4.4 Reroofing. In reroofing and re-covering applications, correcting the slope to 2%

(1/4 in./ft.) is sometimes unfeasible because of low windows, flashings, etc. In these
cases, tapered insulation at 1.5% (3/16 in./ft.) slope may be an acceptable compromise.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 39

10.4.5 Steep Roof Conversion. Conversion of a poorly draining roof to a steep roofing
system may be accomplished on a relatively narrow roof system building by installing
new sloped joists.

10.5 Vapor, Humidity, Moisture and Condensation. Moisture can be carried through
materials by diffusion or by the movement of air. Air barriers are needed to reduce air
movement. They can be located anywhere within the building envelope. Vapor
retarders, when needed, must be placed within the warm portion of the thermal
insulation.

10.5.1 Self-Drying Systems. In cold weather, warm moist indoor air driven from within
the building towards the colder exterior may accumulate during the winter then dry back
out again during the summer months. Guidelines for the use of vapor retarders in roofs
are presented in CRREL Misc. Paper 2489, Vapor Retarders for Membrane Roofing
Systems. Figure 14a indicates suggested maximum allowable relative humidities where
summer dry-out should be adequate. Figure 14b is used to adjust Figure 14a for
temperatures other than 60oF.

10.5.2 Reverse Vapor Drive. For hot humid climates a reverse vapor drive may occur
especially in cooler and freezer buildings. In this case the membrane and wall retarder
sealed and continuous. Roof vents and breathing edge details must be avoided. For
freezer buildings, consider separating the roof system from the freezer.

10.5.3 High Humidity Occupancies. For buildings with high interior relative humidity
including bakeries, laundries, pools, kitchens, dining halls with serving lines and the like,
vapor retarders are considered essential.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 40

 Interior Relative Humidities (%) with Interior Temperature of 68oF)
Figure 14a

Temperature Conversion When Temperatures Differ from 68o F

Figure 14b

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 41

 Typical Indoor Relative Humidity in Winter
Table 15

10.5.4 Bituminous Vapor Retarders. Bituminous retarders are installed over solid fire
barrier substrates such as concrete, gypsum board, or a fire resistant insulation.
Bituminous retarders have near zero perm ratings. For most membrane roofing systems
vapor retarder permeance should be below 0.5 perms (28.6 ng/s•sq m•Pa). Perm
ratings for various vapor retarder materials can be found in the ASHRAE Handbook of
Fundamentals as well as in industry literature.

10.5.5 Non-bituminous Vapor Retarders. Non-bituminous single-ply systems may

use plastic films as vapor retarders. These can be successful if the seams and
penetrations are carefully sealed with tape. Puncturing the retarder, either accidentally
or by installing mechanical fasteners lessens its resistance to moisture.

10.5.6 PMRs. Protected Membrane Roofing systems (PMR’s) are very effective against
vapor drive from within the building. The roof membrane itself serves as the vapor
retarder as most, if not all, of the thermal insulation is located above it. Self-drying of the
insulation (extruded polystyrene) to the atmosphere maintains the thermal resistance.

10.5.7 SPF Systems. SPF systems are commonly installed on re-cover installations
where

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 42

the old bituminous membrane can be sealed to form a retarder. Dew point calculations
are necessary to insure the dew point is within the upper SPF layer.

10.5.8 Steep Roofing. In steep roofing systems the retarder is usually a plastic film
(poly), treated kraft paper or foil facing on batt insulation installed with the retarder
facing the interior. When an attic or cathedral ceiling is present, ventilation of the space
above the insulation is essential since retarders are rarely completely sealed and some
moisture accumulation would otherwise occur. Most codes recommend at least 1:150
net free ventilation area (total at eave and ridge) when a retarder is not installed to
1:300 when a retarder is in place. In cathedral ceiling construction larger net free areas
are needed since friction losses in the narrow airway reduce ventilation.

10.5.9 Metal Systems. In structural metal systems where draped batt insulation is
used, it is difficult to completely seal the retarder facer even if tape is used. When high
interior vapor conditions exist the use of a subdeck to support a retarder film may be
necessary. Other roofing systems should also be considered as such systems are not
good at resisting high internal relative humidities.

10.6 Considerations When Using Thermal Insulation. Thermal insulation is

important in modern buildings both for energy conservation and human comfort and
may impact roof membrane performance.

10.6.1 Thermal Resistance. Resistance to heat flow through the entire roof structure
(characterized by the R factor) should be as high as is both practicable and cost
effective. In general an R factor of > 20 (Rsi > 3.57) is recommended. Note: U = 1/R
therefore, the U factor should be < 0.05 Btu/hr•ft2 oF.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 43

 Unit Resistances (i.e., Resistivity) of Common Roof Insulations
Table 16

10.6.2 Installation Locations. Thermal insulation may be installed in four locations.

10.6.2.1 Underdeck insulation (Figure 15).

• Wood frame structures with steep roofing often utilize batt insulation placed
between the rafters. Vapor retarders of foil, kraft, or plastic film are located on the
inside face of the insulation. With structural standing seam metal systems, batts
are draped over the purlins. In attics, the insulation is usually positioned between
ceiling joists.

• An advantage of underdeck insulation is that inexpensive nonstructural

insulations such as batts may be used.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 44

 Under Deck Insulation
Figure 2-15

• A disadvantage is that the roof deck suffers greater thermal stress than when it is
overlaid with insulation. Another disadvantage is that it is difficult to vapor seal
such construction and make it resist air exfiltration and as a result moisture
problems are prone to occur. Ventilation is usually required but ventilating low-
slope framed roofs lacking tight air barriers is apt to increase moisture problems,
not eliminate them.

• Common underdeck materials include compressible batts of glass fiber and

mineral wool. Thermal spacers of rigid plastic foam are placed over the purlins of
SSSMR systems to maintain the thermal resistance where the batts are
compressed.

10.6.2.2 Self-insulating roof deck (Figure 16):

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 45

 Self-Insulating Roof Deck
Figure 16

• Insulating decks such as structural wood fiber are less popular today because it
is difficult to achieve high R values within the deck itself. In reroofing situations
supplemental insulation would often be added on top of such a deck. In some
new assemblies a composite of structural wood fiber topped with plastic foam is
used. The underside of these self-insulating decks can be exposed to the interior
and serves as an attractive acoustical ceiling.

10.6.2.3 Thermal insulation within the roofing sandwich (Figure 9).

• Insulation on top of the roof deck is the most common configuration for
membrane roofing. For adhered membrane systems the thermal insulation
restrains the membrane against wind loss or shrinkage and must have adequate
structural strength. For mechanically anchored and ballasted systems
compressive strength and stability are important. If hot asphalt or solvents are
used in construction of the membrane, the insulation must resist degradation by
these agents.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 46

 • Common materials for adhered systems include faced polyisocyanurate foam
(ASTM C1289), perlite (ASTM C728), rigid glass fiber boards (ASTM C726),
wood fiber (ASTM C208), and cellular glass (ASTM C552). Verify that the
combination of membrane and roof insulation/facer are Fire and Wind Rated.

• For mechanically fastened and ballasted systems expanded and extruded

polystyrene (ASTM C578) are added to the above list. (They could melt or
dissolve if placed in contact with hot bitumen or solvent-based adhesives).

• Some decay of R value is observed with HCFC blown foams (urethanes and
isoboards) due to diffusion of air and moisture into the cells of the foam.
Manufacturers publish aged R values to reflect this decay. Always used aged R-
values for these materials. Since diffusion starts at the surface of the foam,
thicker foams are more thermally stable.

• Wood fiber boards should be manufactured to use as roof insulation (meeting

ASTM C208), not sheathing boards, and should be limited to 4 ft. in length and
width.

• When mechanical fasteners are used to secure thermal insulation, it is

recommended that the nail-one, mop-one technique be used. This minimizes a
thermal bridging and avoids nail-popping of the membrane. When multiple layers
of insulation are used, vertical joints should be offset to reduce heat losses.
Straight-through joints can take away 10% of a roof’s insulating ability.

(d) Protected membrane systems (Figure 17).

• In PMR systems only extruded polystyrene is suitable in the sometimes wet

environment above the completed roof membrane. This insulation protects the
membrane from thermal stress and abuse.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 47

 • Ballast and filter fabric is needed to hold the loose-laid insulation in place.

Protected Roof Membrane System (PMR)

Figure 17

10.7 Energy and Solar Radiation. The ratio of roof area on a low-rise commercial
building is high relative to wall area. Such roofs can provide a great opportunity for
energy conservation. This can be accomplished by using well insulated, high thermal
mass structures to reduce summer cooling loads, garden roofs, or high albedo roof
coatings.

10.7.1 Heat Gain. For roofs in hot or temperate climates, light colored roof surfaces
reduce heat gain. For membrane roof systems, light colored aggregate (gravel surfaced
roofs) or mineral granules (capsheets [ASTM D249, D371, D3909] and MB capsheets
[ASTM D6162, D6163, D6164, D6222, D6223]) will reduce heat maximum surface
temperatures by up to 35°F over black membranes. Aluminum coatings (ASTM D2824)
are approximately the same, while white coatings (ASTM D6083) have been observed
to reduce temperatures by more than 45°F (provided that the roof stays clean). The use
of pavers and heavy ballast reduce heat gain through thermal lag; that is, the high heat

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 48

capacity stores some of the gained heat delaying the startup of the building’s air
conditioning system. The ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals uses the term
Equivalent Temperature Difference (ETD) in energy calculations. The smaller the ETD,
the better the system is at reducing peak solar loads.

Equivalent Temperature Difference

Table 2-17

reflective roof surfacing materials (e.g., white granules on shingles). Radiant barriers
(reflective foils) placed in attics are also effective.

10.8 Fire Considerations.

10.8.1 Topside Fire Ratings. Because of its large surface area, roofing plays an
important role in fire protection. Fire hazards can be defined as:

10.8.1.1 External, where the source is outside the building such as from wind blown
flaming debris. Tests for external fire resistance are referred to in building codes as
Class A, B and C.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 49

• An external fire rating is established by constructing and testing roofing
assemblies by methods described in ASTM procedure E108 (also known as
UL790). In this method relative degrees of fire resistance are established.

o Class A roof coverings are effective against severe fire exposures. Under
such exposures roof coverings of this class are not readily flammable and do
not carry or communicate fire; afford a fairly high degree of fire protection to
the roof deck; do not slip from position; possess no flying brand hazard; and,
do not require frequent repairs in order to maintain their fire-resistant
properties.

o Class B roof coverings are effective against moderate fire exposures. Under
such exposures roof coverings of this class are not readily flammable and do
not readily carry or communicate fire; afford a moderate degree of fire
protection to the roof deck; do not slip from position; possess no flying brand
hazard; but, may require infrequent repairs in order to maintain their fire-
resistant properties.

o Class C roof coverings are effective against light fire exposures. Under such
exposures roof coverings of this class are not readily flammable and do not
readily carry or communicate fire; afford some degree of fire protection to the
roof deck; do not slip from position; possess no flying brand hazard; and, may
require occasional repairs or renewals in order to maintain their fire-resistant
properties.

• Class A does not mean Grade A! Note: In this classification only fire
performance is considered. A specifier should select the degree of fire resistance
required but recognize that selecting a higher rating does not assure better
waterproofing nor longer life. In fact, some compromise in durability may have
been made to meet the higher fire rating.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 50

 • ASTM E108 fire tests may be conducted on steep roofing, membrane roofing,
SPF, and metal panels. Listings of systems that meet these requirements are
found in the Underwriters Laboratories Roofing Materials and Systems Directory,
the Factory Mutual
• Approval Guide, and reports/directories published by several other qualified
testing agencies.

• Qualified listings:

o If a roofing assembly fails to meet burn-through requirements of ASTM

E108 it may still be listed for use with non-combustible decks such as steel,
concrete, and gypsum.

o Roofing assemblies are listed at the maximum incline to which the rating
applies. As long as the structure under consideration is at a lower or equal
incline to that listed it complies with the fire rating.

o If a listing is intended for use as a roof superimposed over an existing roof, it

should be listed in the UL Roofing Materials and Systems Directory under the
category Maintenance and Repair Systems. In the FM Approval Guide it will
be listed as a Re-cover.

o In general, only the materials listed qualify and only when used in the manner
described in the directories. Additional insulation, for example, might worsen
the flame spread.

10.8.1.2 An internal (underdeck) fire is when the flame spread is underneath the roof
deck. Listings are referred to by the Approval Rating, usually Factory Mutual Class 1 or
Underwriters Laboratories Insulated Metal Deck or Non-metallic Decks Constructions.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 51

• Background—In 1953, a large insulated steel roof deck building suffered an
unexpected, catastrophic fire loss due to an underdeck fire exposure. The roofing
components above the deck contributed fuel to spread the fire. Tests conducted
on full scale test buildings confirmed the hazard. In the late 1950’s, laboratory
tests were established and correlated to the full scale data. Factory Mutual uses
a calorimeter to establish fire performance while Underwriters Laboratories uses
a modified Steiner Tunnel test. Successful systems are listed by FM as Class 1
while Underwriters lists them as either Rated Metal Deck or Rated Non-Metallic
Assemblies.

• The underdeck ratings do not assure zero risk. The ratings assume an
acceptable risk assuming normal fire detection and fire control procedures are
available. If an insulated steel deck system fails to comply with the requirements
of FM Class 1, it is designated Class 2. Class 2 constructions may be converted
to Class 1 by the addition of underdeck fireproofing. Class 2 constructions may
also be acceptable if an approved sprinkler system is used.

• Fire endurance tests. These are time-temperature tests (ASTM E119) in which
the roof-ceiling assembly is subjected to a rising heat load until either the interior
structural elements yield, or the temperature on the exterior roof system reaches
139oC (250oF) above the ambient.

o The minimum elapsed time required before the end point is reached is
usually established by building code or occupancy (e.g., 1-hour, 1-1/2 hour,
etc.).

o Rated assemblies are listed by UL in their Fire Resistance Directory and by

FM in their Approval Guide. Other testing agencies list rated assemblies in
their directories as well.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 52

• Assure that fire compliance (ratings) pertain to the entire assembly. Each component
of the system must be listed in the above directories. Materials delivered to the job
site should bear labels indicating compliance with the construction intended. The
label also provides third party assurance that the products delivered to the
construction site are essentially unchanged from those tested and listed.

10.9 Seismic Requirements. While membrane roofing materials in general do not

affect seismic stability of a structure, components of the roof system may be important.
Roof decks, for example, usually serve as a diaphragm increasing lateral stability.

10.9.1 Bracing for SSSMRs. Structural metal systems with floating clips require
bracing since the structural standing seam metal panels do not provide diaphragm
action. An alternative to bracing is to use a steel subdeck to serve as the shear
diaphragm.

10.9.2 Inertia Effect. Heavy roofing materials such as ballast or pavers may result in
an inertia effect that should be included in the design. This may be beneficial or
detrimental.

10.9.3 Lateral Motion of Tiles. In steep roofing, seismic motion may shatter materials
such as cement and clay tile. Correct use of mechanical anchors may prevent damage.
Twisted wire systems are recommended for earthquake zones. The National Tile
Roofing Manufacturers Association requires two nails or a nail and a clip on every tile to
resist seismic damage.

10.9.4 Restraining Roof Tiles. IR-32-1 (9/89), a Title 24 California code addresses the
attachment of tile, and allows the combination of wire tie and nose clips (wind locks or
tile locks). Nails or wire ties are to be copper, brass, or stainless steel 11 ga. minimum
with two per tile. Nails are to penetrate roof sheathing, battens, or support members 3/4
in. min. Ring shanked nails may be used when sheathing thickness is less than 3/4 in.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 53

10.9.5 Parapet Walls. Parapet walls must be used with care. Through-wall flashings or
cut reglets must be avoided as they reduce the wall’s resistance to lateral forces.

10.9.6 Roofing Over Seismic Straps. Seismic straps (heavy metal plates) are
sometimes installed over plywood roof decks and between decks and walls. Where roof
insulation is not used (i.e., west coast capsheet construction), use construction details
provided by the Western States Roofing Contractors Association on how to roof over
the straps (Figure 18).

Roofing Over Thick Seismic Strap

Figure 18

10.10 Adequate Design Details. Complete sectional views of every location where the
roof changes plane or there is a roof penetration or attachment should be provided on
contract drawings. Sections and design details should be drawn to a legible scale with
each element of the roofing system identified.

© J. Paul Guyer 2009 54