0% found this document useful (0 votes)
825 views54 pages

Defining Public Administration

This document provides an overview of the editorial board and contents of the International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration. It lists Jay M. Shafritz as the Editor in Chief. The encyclopedia contains over 900 articles written by 462 contributors from 23 countries on topics related to public policy and administration. The goal is to provide definitions and information that would be of interest to both specialists and general readers on the vocabulary, concepts, practices, and developments in public administration around the world.

Uploaded by

biitch123biitch
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
825 views54 pages

Defining Public Administration

This document provides an overview of the editorial board and contents of the International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration. It lists Jay M. Shafritz as the Editor in Chief. The encyclopedia contains over 900 articles written by 462 contributors from 23 countries on topics related to public policy and administration. The goal is to provide definitions and information that would be of interest to both specialists and general readers on the vocabulary, concepts, practices, and developments in public administration around the world.

Uploaded by

biitch123biitch
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 54

Defining Public Administration

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor in Chief
Jay M. Shafritz, University of Pittsburgh

Consulting Editors
David H. Rosenbloom, The American University
E. W. Russell, Victoria University of Technology, Melbourne

Associate Editors
Abdullah Al-Khalaf, Institute of Public Administration, Saudi Arabia
Geert Bouckaert, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Beverly A. Cigler, Pennsylvania State, Harrisburg
Peter Foot, United Kingdom Joint Services Command and Staff College
Arie Halachmi, Tennessee State University
Marc Holzer, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Richard D. Heimovics, University of Missouri-Kansas City
Jerry McCaffery, Naval Postgraduate School
J. Steven Ott, University of Utah
David 0. Renz, University of Missouri-Kansas City
Norma M. Riccucci, University at Albany, State University of New York
Larry D. Terry, Cleveland State University
Kenneth F. Warren, St. Louis University
Defining Public
Administration
Selections from the
International Encyclopedia of
Public Policy and Administration

Jay M. Shafritz
Editor in Chief

~l Routledge
~~ Taylor & Francis Group
New York London
First published 2000 by Westview Press

Published 2018 by Routledge


711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN

Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business

Copyright© 2000 by Taylor & Francis

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or uti-
lised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known
or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any infor-
mation storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the
publishers.

Notice:
Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and
are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data


Defining public administration : selections from the International encyclopedia of public
policy and administration I editor in chief, Jay M. Shafritz.
p. em.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-8133-9766-9 (pbk.)
1. Public administration. 2. Policy sciences. I. Shafritz, Jay M.

JF132l.D44 2000
351-dc21 99-087104
CIP
ISBN 13: 978-0-8133-9766-5 (pbk)
CONTENTS

Preface Vll

Part 1 Overviews of Public Administration


1 Public Administration, Frank Marini 3
2 American Administrative Tradition, Nicholas Henry 17
3 Feminist Theory of Public Administration, Camilla Stivers 30

Part 2 Policy Making


4 Policy, William H. Park 39
5 Policy Leadership, JeffreyS. Luke 43
6 Policy Network, Charles J. Fox and Hugh T. Miller 65
7 Rule, Cornelius M. Kerwin 73

Part 3 Intergovernmental Relations


8 Intergovernmental Relations, Dale Krane and Deil S. Wright 83
9 Mandates, Jeffrey D. Straussman 102
10 Government Corporation, Jerry Mitchell 110

Part 4 Bureaucracy
11 Bureaucracy, Ralph P. Hummel 121
12 Bureaucrat Bashing, Charles T. Goodsell 128
13 Bureaupathology, Ruth Hoogland DeHoog 132

Part 5 Organization Behavior


14 Organizational Culture, Dvora Yanow and Guy B. Adams 137
15 Groupthink, Robert T. Golembiewski 147
16 Miles's Law, Jeffery K. Guiler 151
17 Parkinson's Law, Peter Foot 154
18 Peter Principle, Susan C. Paddock 156

Part 6 Public Management


19 Public Management, Mary E. Guy 161
20 Scientific Management, Judith A. Merkle 169
Vl Contents

21 Management Science, Dorothy Olshfski and Michele Collins 180


22 Entrepreneurial Public Administration, Carl J. Bellone 184

Part 7 Strategic Management


23 Leadership, Frederick W. Gibson and Fred E. Fiedler 191
24 Strategic Planning, John M. Bryson 208
25 Mission Statement, Kevin P. Kearns 230

Part 8 Performance Management


26 Productivity, Marc Holzer 237
27 Reengineering, Albert C. Hyde 249
28 Quality Circles, Ann-Marie Rizzo 271
29 Public Enterprise, Roger Wettenhall 279

Part 9 Human Resources Management


30 Public Personnel Administration, Ronald D. Sylvia 295
31 Mentoring, Steven W. Hays 307
32 Pay-for-Performance, Dennis M. Daley 315
33 Workforce Diversity, Donald E. Klingner 322
34 Glass Ceiling, Katherine C. Naff 339

Part 10 Financial Management


35 Financial Administration, John L. Mikesell 345
36 Congressional Budget Process, Philip G. Joyce 355
37 Target-Based Budgeting, Irene S. Rubin 367

Part 11 Auditing and Accountability


38 Audit, Ira Sharkansky 375
39 Accountability, Barbara S. Romzek and Melvin J. Dubnick 382
40 Stewardship, Douglas F. Morgan 396

Part 12 Ethics
41 Administrative Morality, Willa Marie Bruce 407
42 Standards of Conduct, April Hejka-Ekins 416
43 Regime Values, John A. Rohr 420
44 Lying with Statistics, Claire Felbinger 422
45 Whistleblower, Deborah D. Goldman and David H. Rosenbloom 428

Appendix 437
Index 449
PREFACE

Public administration is the totality of the working day activities of all of


the world's bureaucrats, all of the people who work for governments-
whether their activities are legal or illegal, competent or incompetent, de-
cent or despicable. It is very much like the cosmos once described by the
British scientist J. B. S. Haldane: "The universe is not only queerer than
we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose." Things are much the
same with public administration. It is not only far vaster in scope than
most citizens suppose, it is so extensive and pervasive in modem life that
not even the most imaginative of us can imagine it all. Yet, we must try
because the administration of the public's business is too important to ig-
nore, too much a part of our everyday lives, and too potentially danger-
ous to what Thomas Jefferson famously called our "life, liberty, and pur-
suit of happiness."
This book, appropriately entitled Defining Public Administration, is thus
designed to stir the imaginations of readers. The articles collected herein
are all reprinted from the International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Ad-
ministration (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1998). This collection of articles from
the Encyclopedia was created to offer a sampling of the riches to be found
within the larger work. The articles have been organized so that they can
be easily used as a supplement to a core text in an introductory public ad-
ministration course at either the undergraduate or graduate level. The ar-
ticles selected are among the most readable and most interesting to be
found in the larger work. Indeed, one goal in creating this collection was
to encourage students to delve into the rest of the Encyclopedia.
The four-volume Encyclopedia has 900 articles written by 462 contribu-
tors from 23 countries and 42 of the 50 U.S. states. It was designed so that
its contents-a combination of historical and descriptive articles, proce-
dural presentations, and interpretive essays-would be of interest to the
general reader as well as the specialist. Contained therein are definitions
of the vocabulary of public policy and administration as it is used

Vll
Vlll Preface

throughout the world from the smallest towns to the largest national bu-
reaucracies. And when we say definitions we mean just that; all articles
start by defining their topic. So if all the reader is seeking is a quick ex-
planation of the meaning of a concept or practice, they need read no fur-
ther than the first paragraph. The rest of the article will still be there if
and when the reader needs more detailed information. It is this defini-
tional format that inspired the title of the book you are holding.
It is very important that public administration be defined in the most
expansive manner possible. How else to examine its richness and sub-
tlety? How else to become aware of its historical significance, universal
application, and current developments? Public administration is both di-
rect and indirect. It is direct when government employees provide ser-
vices to the public as varied as local bus service, mortgage insurance,
mail delivery, water, and electricity. It is indirect when government pays
private contractors to provide goods or services for citizens. For example,
while NASA operates the space shuttle, the shuttle itself was built by the
employees of private corporations. The security guards and cleaning
staffs of many government buildings are employees of private compa-
nies. Does this put any of them outside the realm of public administra-
tion? Not at all. Remember that a government agency must hire, evalu-
ate, and hold them accountable for the quality of their performance-
whether these companies see to the cleaning of toilets or the building of
spaceships.
Throughout the world, government employees do things that affect
the daily lives of their fellow citizens. These things range from the heroic
(such as a firefighter rescuing a child from a burning building) to the
mundane (such as cleaning the streets). Usually these efforts are benefi-
cial. Sometimes they are not. Most of the time in most countries public
administrators tend to the public's business; for example, they build
schools and highways, collect trash, put out fires, plow snow where it is
cold, kill mosquitoes where it is hot, and provide essential social services
for the middle class as well as the poor. Unfortunately in some lands
public employees may be engaged to torture the innocent and murder
children. Amnesty International is the Nobel Prize-winning organization
that seeks to gain the release of political and religious prisoners by publi-
cizing their plight. Each year it publishes a report on the states that bru-
talize and violate the civil rights of their citizens. Now who do you think
does all this brutalizing and violating? None other than their local public
administrators! As a profession, public administration has developed
Preface ix

values and ethical standards. But as an activity, it has no values. It merely


reflects the cultural norms, beliefs, and power realities of its society. It is
simply government doing whatever government does-in whatever po-
litical and cultural context it happens to exist.
The Encyclopedia is a major effort toward the international integration
of the literature on public policy and administration-which are two
sides of the same coin (policy being the decisionmaking side while ad-
ministration is the implementation side). We called the Encyclopedia "in-
ternational" because it contains extensive coverage of public policy and
administration concepts and practices from throughout the world. In-
deed, public administration is increasingly an international discipline.
While the administrative systems of nation-states were once largely self-
contained, today cross-fertilization is the norm. The national marketplace
of ideas wherein policies and techniques once competed has been re-
placed by an international marketplace. Thus the Encyclopedia contains
articles on reinventing government in the United States, Thatcherism in
the United Kingdom, and the New Zealand model. The reforms dis-
cussed in these articles (further elaborated upon by conceptual articles on
devolution, managerialism, and market testing, among others) have been
widely influential. Different political cultures, let alone differing admin-
istrative machinery, require different administrative solutions. Neverthe-
less the compelling reason for students of public administration to be
fully aware of the wealth of new management ideas and administrative
experiments happening in other states is not so much to be able to imitate
as to adapt.
In order to provide a sense of the cultural differentiation of the world's
administrative regimes, many articles focus on the administrative tradi-
tions of a society-for example, the American administrative tradition,
the German administrative tradition, and the Islamic administrative tra-
dition. Other articles focus on unique administrative institutions within a
state-for example, the Ecole Nationale d' Administration in France, the
Federal Reserve System in the United States, and the Prime Minister's
Office in Canada. Extensive coverage is also given to the practices and in-
stitutions of the European Community; for example directive, pillariza-
tion, and subsidiarity.
Finally because so much of the public's administration is conducted
outside of traditional government bureaucracies, extensive coverage has
been given to nongovernmental and nonprofit organization manage-
ment. Thus, there are major articles on foundations, voluntary action,
X Preface

and the independent sector, among others. A complete list of all of the ar-
ticles in the Encyclopedia is included in an appendix to this book. It is an
enticing menu. Use it to decide which articles you may want to read in
addition to those reprinted here.
While Jay M. Shafritz of the University of Pittsburgh, the editor in
chief, initiated the Encyclopedia, it was from the beginning very much a
team effort. First he consulted extensively with David H. Rosenbloom of
the American University in Washington D.C. and E. W. Russell of Victo-
ria University in Australia. Thus, they became the "consulting" editors.
These three developed the overall design and dimensions of the Encyclo-
pedia. Then they invited thirteen other public policy and administration
scholars at major universities to join the team as associate editors. All the
editors then sought out the 462 contributors. Each editor was eventually
responsible for a few dozen to more than a hundred articles. Most editors
also wrote articles themselves.
Many of you would not be reading this book if you were not engaged
in or contemplating public service activities. What follows is not so much
a comprehensive survey-the field is too vast to be encompassed in one
or even a dozen readers-but a reconnaissance. Herein is the lay of the
land that you will encounter in the environment of public administra-
tion. Learn how to tinker with the machinery of government, see how
employees adapt to life in public organizations, discover the ancient se-
crets of modern strategic management, review the arcane rules of public
personnel administration, buy into the politics of the budgetary process,
and finally, examine how ethical it all is. Public administration is not only
a play that has a cast of millions, it is also a show that's been going on for
more than 5,000 years. The modest goal of this collection is to make your
journey into the sometimes untamed frontier of the public sector more
successful by providing the necessary definitional, historical, and con-
ceptual perspectives on this strange world. And how strange is it? As
Haldane said: stranger than we can imagine. Nevertheless, if you read
on, you will stretch your imagination and develop a fuller appreciation
for the importance and diversity of public administration.

Jay M. Shafritz
Part One
Overviews of Public Administration
1
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Frank Marini,
University of Akron (emeritus)

1. The occupational sector, enterprises, and activities having to do with


the formulation and implementation of policy of governmental and other
public programs and the management of organizations and activities in-
volved. 2. The academic field concerned with the study of, improvement
of, and training for the activities mentioned in 1.
Public administration refers to two distinguishable but closely related
activities: (1) a professional practice (vocation, occupation, field of activ-
ity), and (2) an academic field which seeks to understand, develop, criti-
cize, and improve that professional practice as well as to train individu-
als for that practice. The simple meaning of the term is quite direct: it
refers on the one hand to the administration or management of matters
which have principally to do with the society, polity, and its subparts
which are not essentially private, familial, commercial, or individualistic,
and on the other hand to the disciplined study of such matters. In this
simplest meaning, public administration has to do with managing the
realm of governmental and other public activities. This simple definition
conveys the essence of public administration and probably covers the
vast majority of activities and concerns of contemporary public adminis-
tration.
Such a simple view, though, needs modification to account for at least
two important considerations: First, it must be recognized that profes-
sional management of the public's affairs involves not only management
in the narrowest sense (keeping the books, handling personnel decisions,
implementing decisions which have been made elsewhere in the politico-
socio-economic systems, etc.), but also significantly involves the plan-
ning, formulating, modifying, and urging of goals and purposes of much

3
4 Public Administration

of public affairs. Second, it must be recognized that some matters of pub-


lic administration are handled in ways which are not purely private but
are also not precisely governmental.
The first consideration-that public administration is involved in the
substance of policy as well as in the implementation of policy decisions-
is frequently alluded to with terms such as the demise of the politics-ad-
ministration dichotomy, the impossibility of value-free public adminis-
tration, and the need for proactivity by public administrators. These
terms reflect the widespread, though not universal, belief or allegation
that it is no longer, if ever it was, defensible to interpret public adminis-
tration as solely involved in technically objective solutions or in the neu-
tral implementation of decisions made by nonadministrative parts of the
political system (e.g., partisan leadership; electoral processes; party
processes; partisan bargaining; and parliamentary, legislative, and judi-
cial institutions). This belief and related understandings have led to sig-
nificant public administration attention to policy and policy process.
Some have felt a need for a rubric which emphasizes such a policy focus
and which might also encompass or indicate receptivity to areas of stud-
ies which are closely related (e.g., planning, urban affairs, economic
analysis, public policy analysis), and terms such as public affairs are
sometimes used for this purpose. In general, though, public administra-
tion still functions as the umbrella term throughout the world, though it
must be realized that the term implies a broader range of concerns and
activities than the narrow meaning of management or administration
may convey.
The second consideration-that not all public administration occurs in
and through governmental organizations-also has led to a broadening
of the meaning of public administration. At various times in the past of
public administration it has seemed that its essence and activities could
be identified by referring to nonmarket approaches to social purposes,
but this perspective has been mitigated by the recognition that public
programs and benefits could be developed through and provided with
some market characteristics. Thus there have been developments such as
governmental or quasi-governmental activities which compete with pri-
vate sector activities or provide benefits through use of a price mecha-
nism; sometimes water, utilities, sewers, health care, education, and
other benefits are provided in this way. There are also devices such as
public corporations, quasi-public corporations, public-private coopera-
tive enterprises, and government contractual arrangements with non-
Frank Marini 5

governmental organizations to provide certain benefits or perform cer-


tain functions. Indeed, even for large parts of the world where the pri-
vate-public distinction has not been as prevalent or obvious as other
places (for example, where the economy is essentially directed or non-
market), the movement toward market or marketlike mechanisms for the
provision of public goods is increasingly a matter or rhetoric, planning,
or action.
When these considerations are taken into account, public administra-
tion is probably best defined as the practice and study of the professional
formulation and influence of public policy and the implementation of
such policy on a regular and organized basis on behalf of the public inter-
est of a society, its civic subparts, and its citizenry.

Development of the Field


As first defined above, public administration has existed virtually since
human beings first cooperated on behalf of their society for common pur-
poses. Clear and explicit discussion both of the task of formulating deci-
sions and of carrying out the details of those decisions may be found
among the most ancient documents of various civilizations. Attention to
the proper education and training of individuals for the various tasks in-
volved is also clear and explicit in many such documents. The systematic
study and codification of the technical aspects of such endeavors in a
style reflecting the contemporary field of public administration may be
variously dated.
It is usual, for example, to date the contemporary social scientific
awareness of bureaucracy (a term which can include both private, or
"business," administration and public administration) with the work of
the German social scientist Max Weber (1864-1920). Such dating, though,
is more a matter of convenience or recognition of important scholarly in-
fluence than of historical accuracy. For example, the German and French
writer Baron de Grimm (1723-1807), the German philosopher Georg W.
F. Hegel (1770-1831), and other philosophers and social commentators
explicitly discussed bureaucracy; and the English economist and social
philosopher John Stuart Mill (1806-1873)-especially in his 1861 Consid-
erations on Representative Government-offered profound insights into
public bureaucracy and its possible relationship to representative gov-
ernment. Similarly, in many European countries-especially those which
see public administration as essentially a subfocus of public law-under-
6 Public Administration

standings of systematic modern public administration may be traced to


ancient Roman law and its heritage, to the eighteenth-century German
and Austrian Cameralists and Prussian government, to the nineteenth-
century Napoleonic Code and its influences, and to the general heritage
of positive law.
In the United States, it is usual to credit the reformism of the Populist
and Progressive era of politics (about 1880-1920) and especially
Woodrow Wilson's academic article "The Study of Administration" (in
the Political Science Quarterly in 1887) for the systematic and self-con-
scious development of the field of public administration. It is usual also
to identify the early years of U.S. public administration with scientific
management, a school of thought largely attributed to Frederick
Winslow Taylor (1856-1915) which emphasized a task analysis and effi-
ciency approach to management; and with the subsequent human rela-
tions movement, which emphasized the human and social aspects of
work environments and motivations somewhat in contradistinction to
the scientific management movement. Both of these latter movements
had their orgins in industrial and business management, but were very
influential on public administration in the United States and around the
world. The period of U.S. history between the Great Depression and
World War II (about 1929-1945) is commonly held to represent U.S. pub-
lic administration in a self-confident-though some also say naive-
phase; this period is frequently referred to in the United States and else-
where as the period of classical public administration or orthodox public
administration. The period between the end of World War II and the
1960s is usually interpreted as a period of the growth of a behavioral, em-
pirical approach to the social sciences and to public administration and
its concerns. Not only in the United States, but in the industrialized and
industrializing world generally, this period has been characterized as
bringing scientific and technological advances to public administration.
The dynamics of the Cold War competition between the United States
and Western allies and the USSR and its allies, and the manifestation of
this competition in various forms of technical assistance, aid in economic
development, and administrative assistance had an impact upon public
administration. In the 1960s and 1970s, much of the world of science and
technology came under attack. In the United States, these decades and
their challenges have come to be interpreted against the backdrop of the
civil rights movement (and related movements such as feminism), Viet-
nam War activism, the "new left," anti-institutionalism, and particular
Frank Marini 7

manifestations of youth rebellion. Other parts of the world also experi-


enced similar movements, frequently exacerbated by issues of neocolo-
nialism, nationalism, anti-institutionalism, environmentalism, anti-tech-
nologism, and general critiques of scientific and technological
perspectives and, indeed, the entirety of "modernity." All of these mat-
ters had effects upon politics, the social sciences, and public administra-
tion. In the United States and elsewhere, many of these developments
were accompanied by significant critiques of public administration. One
manifestation of this was a dialogue about the need for fundamental re-
thinking in public administration (and, for some, the need for a "new
public administration"). In the last couple of decades, this had been aug-
mented by tremendous technological developments (e.g., in computer
applications and in communications developments) on the one hand,
and ever more sophisticated philosophical and methodological interpre-
tations asserting that we are transcending "modernity" in ways which
call much of our contemporary understanding and technological ap-
proaches into question on the other hand. At the present time, public ad-
ministration worldwide is in creative tension and undergoing rapid
change and attempts at reconceptualization. What the effects of all this
will be over time, or what the next developmental stage will be, is un-
clear but generally appears to have an energizing effect upon the field.

Configuration of the Field


Public administration is sometimes treated as though it is one of the so-
cial sciences, a discipline in some sense. As the number of programs of-
fering doctoral degrees in the field has increased, this interpretation has
gained strength. In some countries, public administration is a formal, de-
gree-granting field at both the baccalaureate and postbaccalaureate lev-
els. In some countries, public administration is not a degree-granting
field, and education for the public administration academic and practi-
tioner is pursued through undergraduate and graduate degree programs
in economics, political science, law, and other such fields. In some other
countries, public administration is a degree program at the post-bac-
calaureate but nondoctorallevel (i.e., degrees or certificates exist at the
master's level, but undergraduate study and doctoral study are pursued
under the disciplinary auspices of other disciplines such as law, econom-
ics, history, sociology, political science, etc.). In some countries, those
who aspire to public administration careers at the highest levels of the
8 Public Administration

professional civil service compete for admission to special academies and


schools which serve this specific purpose. And, of course, some of these
types of educational programs exist in mixed forms in many places.
In the United States, it is relatively unusual for public administration
to be a free-standing degree program at the baccalaureate level (though
there are some well-established and prestigious programs of this sort-
especially in schools of public affairs, schools of management, or schools
of public administration-and this approach may be on the increase).
The more traditional and still usual pattern is for baccalaureate education
in public administration to be a major or minor specialization within a
political science degree program. Master-level degrees are increasingly
emphasized as desirable or expected credentials for full commitment to
professional careers in many fields (e.g., not only in business administra-
tion and public administration, but also in fields such as education, social
work, nursing, and education where the appropriate degree for profes-
sional entry was once the baccalaureate), and the master's degree-usu-
ally, but not always, the master of public administration (MPA)-is be-
coming the recognized degree for those who aspire to careers in public
administration. It should be remembered, though, that public organiza-
tions and activities cover virtually the whole spectrum of contemporary
specialties and that the educational background and specialties of public
administrators therefore reflect this diversity. Many individuals who
spend their working lives in public administration (as well as business
administration) organizations and enterprises will have come from edu-
cational backgrounds such as police, justice, firefighting, engineering,
health services, liberal arts and sciences education, and technical training
of a broad range. Increasingly, though, the expectation is for postbac-
calaureate (degree or nondegree, and frequently "in-service" or "on the
job") education for those who spend a career in the public service regard-
less of what the preservice education or training may have been.
Education for the academic part of the field of public administration-
especially at the doctoral level-continues to rely heavily upon the social
science disciplines. Even when doctoral degree education is in public ad-
ministration (or public affairs, public policy, urban affairs, or other la-
bels), the program of studies is interdisciplinary with heavy reliance
upon the social science disciplines. Doctoral education for public admin-
istration-as for business administration and the social science disci-
plines-also involves significant attention to statistics, information sys-
tems, computer-assisted modeling, and other technical areas.
Frank Marini 9

As modern and contemporary public administration evolved, it


tended to develop a more or less regular set of subfields, approaches, and
topical interests. These generally have to do either with the functional
and technical specializations of public administration, with specific
methods and approaches, or with the phenomena of specific locales and
issue areas of public administration.
Thus, public administration has some subfields which deal with con-
cerns which, in one form or another, have been part of the field since its
earliest days. Budget and finance (how to provide, handle, and account
for material resources), personnel (the policies and management of hu-
man resources), planning, operations management, organizational de-
sign and management, communications and communications systems,
record-keeping, accounting of various kinds, reporting of various kinds
and for a variety of purposes and clientele, internal and external public
relations, and a host of similar concerns constitute some of the technical
and functional foci of the field. In addition to these, there are various con-
cerns dealing with the environment and context of administration: the
constitutional and legal context; the context of the political, economic,
and societal structure, requirements, and processes; the values, history,
traditions, and habits of the society and its components; the values, his-
tory, requirements, and processes of the organizations, programs, and
components of specific relevance at any given time; and many other such
factors (as well as their interrelationships).
Specific approaches, methods, or procedural preferences sometimes
also have aspects of subfield about them. Specializations such as pro-
gram and organizational evaluation, organizational development, opera-
tions research, quantitative aids to management, and the like are partly
defined by methodological affinity or choice, but tend also to become
subfields of research, education, and training. Similarly, participative
management, participative policy processes, focus group approaches,
some approaches to leadership, some aspects of strategic planning, and
the like are partly defined by conclusions about organizational and ad-
ministrative dynamics; partly by epistemological and methodological
preferences; and partly by political or civic values and theories-and
they, too, tend to become something like subfields in research, education,
and training. The general dialogue in the social sciences and humani-
ties-and even in some aspects of the physical and life sciences-con-
cerning methodologies and epistemologies which are sometimes referred
to with terms such as positivism and postpositivism, while not manifest-
10 Public Administration

ing itself as subfield concentrations or subfields, manifests itself as some-


thing of a watershed in public administration as it has in other fields.
There are also specializations and foci having to do with the specific
form and level at which administration occurs: international administra-
tion; national administration; federal/ confederal administration,
state/province administration, district/ department/ sector administra-
tion; city, county, and local administration; intergovernmental and in-
terorganizational administration; "not for profit" administration; and so
forth. Issue areas present other topics and specializations: police, fire,
schools, military, medical, environmental, technology and technology
transfer, science and scientific applications, government-business-indus-
try cooperation, and a host of other specific issue concerns spawn spe-
cializations of knowledge, application, training, and experience.
When one realizes that all these (and many more) can be viewed as
components of a huge matrix where any one (or more) can be related to
any other one (or more), the complexity and variety of the field of public
administration is suggested. A good sense of the present configuration of
the field can be gained by consulting the considerable set of general pub-
lic administration textbooks in use around the world. Perusal of these
will give a good sense of the functional, topical, methodological, and cur-
ricular definition of the field. Comparison of current textbooks with ear-
lier ones can provide a good sense of the changes and development of the
field, and comparison of textbooks from one country to another can pro-
vide a sense of how approaches may vary internationally. There are also
many professional and academic journals of the field worldwide; these
journals can provide a good sense of the current state and interests of the
field, as well as some sense of the different emphases from one setting to
another.

Public Administration as a
Cultural and Social Phenomenon
The phenomena of public administration are also objects of study for
purposes other than the development of public administration. That is,
public administration can be the focus of study of other disciplines or
concerns, much as religion can be a topic of investigation for a sociologist
who is not religious and has no interest in improving religious experi-
ence for the godly. Thus, complex organizations, bureaucracy, and a vari-
ety of organizational, administrative, and policy phenomena constitute
Frank Marini 11

topics of interest to scholars from a variety of disciplines, fields, and per-


spectives. Economists, sociologists, political scientists, philosophers, his-
torians, students of literature and of communications and rhetoric, and a
host of other academic specialists find public administration and its phe-
nomena worthwhile objects of investigation. The field of public adminis-
tration, for its part, contributes to, profits from, and incorporates such
studies.

Concern for Identity


and Legitimacy
A characteristic of public administration in recent decades has been a
concern for the identity or legitimacy of the field. This may, in fact, be
several separable concerns, which are frequently subsumed under the
idea of "identity crisis." There are at least six aspects of this concern: (1)
questioning and clarification which is typical of the formation of disci-
plines and fields; (2) concern over whether public administration is,
properly speaking, a profession; (3) unease about theoretical unification;
(4) puzzling effects of the applied nature of the field or the fact that the
field has a professional or occupational concern as well as a scholarly or
academic concern; (5) ambivalence about bureaucracy, hierarchy, and in-
strumental relationships; and (6) concern about the political legitimacy of
public administration.
A concern for disciplinary identity is a typical concern in the general
configuration and reconfiguration of disciplined understanding of the
world. As public administration worries about its own identity, and espe-
cially as it does so against the backdrop of the social sciences and related
fields of practice, it sometimes does so without clear memory or full ap-
preciation of the recency of the present configuration and identities of
disciplinary identities. Political science and sociology-to take two exam-
ples close to public administration dialogue-have only within the last
century and a half invented themselves in their present identity. The his-
tory of such fields has been one of dialogue, tension, and uncertainty
about epistemology, methodology, identity, and even chief phenomena of
study. Indeed, this state of affairs is characteristic not only of the history
but also of the present state of such fields. Thus, it is not surprising that
identity questioning and insecurity has been characteristic of public ad-
ministration from the inception of its self-conscious awareness as a field.
The Wilson essay frequently cited as an example of the birth of a self-
12 Public Administration

aware field of public administration in the United States was concerned


precisely and explicitly with the question of the identity of a field of
study and practice. The development of the field as a focus for study and
training, concerning as it did an emphasis upon a new field or an inter-
disciplinary field, obviously had to focus on the continual definition of it-
self and on the distinguishing of itself from other foci and fields; this
would seem true of all such developments, though it is sometimes notre-
membered in discussions of the development of fields which have been
long established.
Though questions about the autonomy of the field may be less seri-
ously raised than they have been in the past, they are still encountered
from time to time and from several directions. For example, while a
generic approach (i.e., the idea that administration or management is es-
sentially the same field regardless of whether it is applied to business,
education, health institutions, social work or social services, and so on)
may not be as strongly asserted as it once was, the basic idea is still en-
countered in various forms. Sometimes institutions of higher education
organize in ways which reflect this notion (e.g., a public administration
department in a college or school of business or management), though
there are many reasons other than the epistemological, intellectual, pro-
fessionat or pedagogical why an institution might choose a particular or-
ganizational arrangement. There are professional and academic confer-
ences, associations, and journals which project public administration as a
subunit in a somewhat generic field of management.
On the other hand, countervailing interpretations are indicated by pro-
fessional and organizational conferences, associations, and journals
which project public administration as a subfield in the discipline of po-
litical science. As indicated earlier, such dynamics seem to be a normal
part of configuration and reconfiguration of intellectual enterprises gen-
erally. It is likely that public administration has as much integrity and
clarity about its enterprise as most other fields have at a comparable
stage of development; it seems unlikely that worry over precise discipli-
nary status should be more of a hindrance to public administration than
it has been or is to other fields.
Sometimes worry over the issue of professional status is part of the
perceived identity crisis. Thus, it is sometimes asked whether public ad-
ministration is or can aspire to be a profession, and frequently this is
framed with specific reference to traditional professions. Though such a
question may have interesting implications, there seems to be a develop-
Frank Marini 13

ing consensus that it is important to articulate appropriate professional


standards, expectations, and ethics without worrying unduly about
whether the field is a profession in all the senses of the traditional profes-
sions (e.g., law, medicine, and religious ministry). Still, questions about
professional status have contributed to the sense some have of identity
crisis.
A related aspect of this identity insecurity is concern over unifying the-
ory: it is frequently said that public administration lacks a unifying the-
ory such as some other fields or disciplines are alleged to have. It is true
that public administration may tend to draw from a more multidiscipli-
nary pool of knowledge than some fields, though even this is more often
than not exaggerated (as reflection upon the developing edges of even
hard sciences would suggest). It may be true that the practitioner connec-
tion gives public administration a somewhat more eclectic appearance
than some fields; but, again, this eclecticism and its related complexities
and nuances may be more usual in the development of fields than is
sometimes recognized (as reflection upon the diversity of investigations
and applications in most of the social or human sciences may suggest).
As to theoretical unity or clear dominant paradigms, it is likely that the
presence of such in many fields, as well as its absence in public adminis-
tration, may be regularly overstated.
The fact that the field of public administration is both an academic en-
deavor and a professional field is sometimes thought to limit the field's
disciplinary possibilities. Thus some suggest that public administration
should be thought of as an applied field of practice and training, while
basic research and education should be recognized as taking place in
other fields which are thought to be more clearly disciplines or sciences.
Sometimes the suggestion is made-most notably identified with
Dwight Waldo-that public administration may be a field, discipline, or
science in the way that medicine is; and that like medicine, it may be both
a scientific and practitioner concern which draws on such other fields of
learning as it finds fruitful to its own purposes and activities. The roles of
basic research and applied purpose are likely to be the focus of dialogue
in public administration (as well as in many other fields) for the foresee-
able future. Public administration is likely to continue to have research,
education, training, and practice concerns for the foreseeable future also.
In this regard, the field may resemble established fields such as medicine
or engineering and new fields such as genetic science, polymer science,
or cognitive science; and it is as unlikely that the field of public adminis-
14 Public Administration

tration will be limited by practical and applied concerns as it is that these


other fields will.
An interesting aspect of public administration as a field of academic
study and as a field of training for professional practice is its seeming
ambivalence about itself. For example, a few years ago, Aaron Wil-
davsky, a friendly critic, wondered in print why, since public administra-
tion seemed so essentially involved with hierarchy and bureaucracy,
public administration scholars seemed so unwilling to embrace or de-
fend these characteristics. Thus it may seem from some perspectives that
scholars of public administration seem to deplore so much of which
seems characteristic of, indeed definitional of, their field. Even within the
field itself there have been arguments and dialogue which seem to inter-
pret large parts of the academic field of public administration as essen-
tially opposed to public administration. From a somewhat different per-
spective, though, the "critics from within" frequently feel they are not
attacking the essence of public administration, but rather arguing that
some characteristics which have seemed essential to others are in fact not
essential but could be changed, eroded, reduced, or removed to the im-
provement of the field. From this perspective, then, characteristics such
as bureaucracy and hierarchy may not be unavoidable and definitional
characteristics of public administration, but rather may be unfortunate
aspects which an improved public administration would mitigate or
avoid.
Perhaps the most important aspect of the concern about legitimacy and
identity of the field has to do explicitly with the question of political le-
gitimacy. Long ago, most debate about whether a specific government
was legitimate or not would have rested upon questions of the line of
succession or mystical or religious indication of the identity of the legiti-
mate ruler. For much of the present-day world-and certainly most of
the world in which public administration would have conscious iden-
tity-the question of governmental legitimacy turns on the public good
(in many cases expressed in terms of the interest of the citizenry or even
the will of the people). Under this understanding of legitimacy, questions
of the legitimacy of public administration (essentially nonelected skill-
based participants in rule) are difficult. A traditional answer to the prob-
lem posed has been that the public administrators bring their skills, train-
ing, and job experience to serve the purposes and directions indicated by
the people's representatives (who frequently, and especially within rep-
resentative governments, have been selected through some devices, such
Frank Marini 15

as elections, in which the citizens have had a voice). This is sometimes re-
ferred to as administrative neutrality: the idea that civil servants will
bring their knowledge and skills to the service of whichever party or set
of individuals is chosen to govern from time to time. This answer is still
the largely unquestioned theory of public administration legitimacy in
many parts of the world. Where public administration has been inter-
preted more frequently as having large aspects of discretion, policy for-
mulation responsibilities, and relatively autonomous leadership roles,
though, the possibility or appropriateness of neutrality has been increas-
ingly called into question. This has left the field of public administration
with the need to understand and explicate precisely how public adminis-
trators are or can be legitimate with reference to the citizenry and duly
established political orders. Working out the important ramifications of
such questions leads to dialogue and debate about the foundations of
public administration legitimacy, and this leads some to articulate a sense
that the field is in search of its role, identity, and purpose.
When these and other aspects-the mix, priority, and relative weight
of specific aspects varies from context to context and polity to polity-of
public administration identity are given serious and continuous delibera-
tion and debate, it is understandable that fundamental questions about
the status of public administration take on critical importance. The issues
and the dialogue are not presently at rest, and they are not likely to be in
the foreseeable future.

Future of the Field


Though the field of public administration is perennially concerned about
the identity and security of the field, the future and identity seem secure
even if the exact intellectual configuration cannot be precisely predicted.
The "practice" of public administration is affected everywhere by po-
litical and resource changes. Visible aspects of such changes at the pres-
ent time are concerns over the resources devoted to governmental and
public activities (taxes, the portion of the economy devoted to govern-
mental or public sector activities, etc.); increased interest in many places
in introducing greater aspects of market factors into heretofore nonmar-
ket public sector activities; continued interest in countering hierarchical
and impersonal ("red tape," etc.) aspects; and continued concern about
responsibility and accountability to the citizenry and its interests. The
practice of public administration also experiences today, as it always has,
16 Public Administration

the challenges of technological developments. Such concerns and inter-


ests bespeak possible changes in public administration, but they proba-
bly do not threaten the existence or identity of the practice, occupations,
or vocations of public administration.
The "academic" part of public administration has continually under-
gone change, and in recent history it has continually interpreted such
change as fundamental or as a matter of identity and essence. Intellectual
history and the sociology of knowledge would suggest that we should
expect the study of public administration to be buffeted by the winds of
intellectual change, growth, and challenge (as all active fields of thought
will be). Thus, public administration will participate in, and be influ-
enced by, developments in virtually all areas of human thought.
Presently, the field is visibly influenced not only by incremental develop-
ments of preexisting themes and directions, but also by the host of intel-
lectual, philosophical, methodological, epistemological, and esthetic de-
velopments which are loosely grouped under labels such as
postmodernism. The field has always been influenced by, and partici-
pated in, the intellectual climate and dialogue of its times. It will continue
to do so. And this will be a sign, not particularly of crises of identity or
future, but rather of vitality and engagement.

Bibliography
Gladden, E. N., 1972. A History of Public Administration. 2 vols. London and Port-
land, OR: Frank Cass and Co., Ltd.
Lynn, Naomi B. and Aaron Wildavksy, eds., 1990. Public Administration: The State
of the Discipline. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Mill, John Stuart, (1861) 1991. Considerations on Representative Government. Buffalo,
NY: Prometheus Books.
Mosher, Frederick C., ed., 1975. American Public Administration: Past, Present, Fu-
ture. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
Perry, James L., ed., 1989. Handbook of Public Administration. 2nd ed. 1996 San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
Shafritz, Jay M. and Albert C. Hyde, eds., 1992. Classics of Public Administration.
3d ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Wilson, Woodrow, 1887. "The Study of Administration." Political Science Quar-
terly, vol. 2 (June).
Public Administration
Gladden, E. N. , 1972. A History of Public Administration. 2 vols. London and Portland, OR:
Frank Cass and Co., Ltd.
Lynn, Naomi B. and Aaron Wildavksy , eds., 1990. Public Administration: The State of the
Discipline. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Mill, John Stuart , (1861) 1991. Considerations on Representative Government. Buffalo, NY:
Prometheus Books.
Mosher, Frederick C. , ed., 1975. American Public Administration: Past, Present, Future.
Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
Perry, James L. , ed., 1989. Handbook of Public Administration. 2nd ed. 1996 San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass, Inc.
Shafritz, Jay M. and Albert C. Hyde , eds., 1992. Classics of Public Administration. 3d ed.
Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Wilson, Woodrow , 1887. "The Study of Administration." Political Science Quarterly, vol. 2
(June).

American Administrative Tradition


Adrian, Charles R. , 1988. "Forms of City Government in American History." In The Municipal
Year Book, 1988. Washington, D.C.: International City Management Association, pp. 3–11.
Anderson, Eric , 1989. "Two Major Forms of Government: Two Types of Professional
Management." In The Municipal Year Book, 1989, Washington, D.C.: International City
Management Association, pp. 26–32.
Anderson, Wayne , ed., 1962. "County Government." In Concise Dictionary of American
History. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Bowen, Catherine Drinker , 1966. Miracle at Philadelphia. Boston: Little, Brown.
Caldwell, Lynton K. , 1990. "The Administrative Republic: The Contrasting Legacies of Hamilton
and Jefferson." Public Administration Quarterly, vol. 13 (Winter) 470–493.
Crozier, Michel , 1964. The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cutler, Lloyd N. , 1980. "To Form a Government." Foreign Affairs, vol. 59 (Fall) 126–143.
De Santis, Victor S. , 1989. "County Government: A Centry of Change." In The Municipal Year
Book, 1989. Washington, D.C.: International City Management Association, pp. 55–84.
Hamilton, Alexander , 1961. "No. 70" and "No. 72." In Clinton Rossiter , ed., The Federalist
Papers. New York: New American Library, pp. 423–431 and pp. 435–440.
Heclo, Hugh , 1977. A Government of Strangers; Executive Politics in Washington. Washington,
D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Hosftede, Geert , 1980. Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related
Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Ingraham, Patricia W , 1987. "Building Bridges or Burning Them? The President, the
Appointees, and the Bureaucracy." Public Administration Review, vol. 47 (September/ October)
425–435.
"Introduction," 1993. In The Municipal Year Book, 1993. Washington, D.C.: International City
Management Association, pp. ix–xv.
Kent, William , 1898. Memoirs and Letters of James Kent. Boston: Little, Brown.
Renner, Tari and Victor S. De Santis , 1993. "Contemporary Patterns and Trends in Municipal
Government Structures." In The Municipal Year Book, 1993. Washington, D.C.: International
City Management Association, pp. 57–69.
Smith, Page , 1980. The Constitution: A Documentary and Narrative History, New York: Morrow
Quill Paperbacks.
Southall, Aidan W. , 1953. Alur Society: A Study in Processes and Types of Domination.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Syrett, Harold and Jacob E. Cooke , eds., 1961-1979. The Papers of Alexander Hamilton. 26
vols. New York: Columbia University Press,
Van Riper, Paul P. , 1983. "The American Administrative State: Wilson and the Founders—An
Unorthodox View." Public Administration Review, vol. 43 (November/December). 477–490.
White, Leonard D. , 1936. "The Meaning of Principles of Public Administration." In John M.
Gaus , Leonard D. White and Marshall E. Dimock , eds., The Frontiers of Public Administration.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 13–25.

Feminist Theory of Public Administration


Denhardt, Robert B. , and Jan Perkins , 1976. "The Coming Death of Administrative Man."
Public Administrative Review, vol. 36, no. 4 (July-August); 379–384.
Eyde, Lorraine D. , 1973. "The Status of Women in State and Local Government." Public
Personnel Management (May-June): 205–211.
Ferguson, Kathy E. , 1984. The Feminist Case Against Bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple
University Press.
Franzway, Suzanne , Dianne Court , and R. W. Connell , eds., 1989. Staking a Claim:
Feminism, Bureaucracy, and the State. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
Gallas, Mesta M. , ed., 1976. "A Symposium: Women in Public Administration." Public
Administration Review, vol. 36, no. 4 (July-August): 347–389.
Guy, Mary E. , ed., 1992. Women and Men of the States: Public Administrators at the State
Level. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Hall, Mary M. , and Rita Mae Kelly , eds., 1989. Gender, Bureaucracy, and Democracy: Careers
and Equal Opportunity in the Public Sector. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Lerner, Gerda , 1984. "The Rise of Feminist Consciousness." In E. M. Bender , B. Burk , and N.
Walker , eds., All of Us Are Present. Columbia, MO: James Madison Wood Research Institute,
Stephens College.
Mohr, Judith , 1973. "Why Not More Women City Managers?" Public Management (February-
March): 2–5.
Stewart, Debra , 1990. "Women in Public Administration." In Naomi B. Lynn , and Aaron B.
Wildavsky , eds., Public Administration: The State of the Discipline. Chatham, NJ: Chatham
House.
Stivers, Camilla , 1993. Gender Images in Public Administration: Legitimacy and the
Administrative State. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Policy
Braybrooke, D. and C. E. Lindblom , 1963. A Strategy of Decision. New York: The Free Press.
Hill, Michael , ed., 1993. The Policy Process: A Reader. New York and London: Harvester
Wheatsheaf.
Hogwood, B. W. and L. A. Gunn , 1984. Policy Analysis for the Real World. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Jenkins, W. I. , 1978. Policy Analysis. London: Martin Robertson.
Lasswell, H. D. , 1958. "The Policy Orientation." In D. Lerner and H- D. Lasswell , eds., The
Policy Sciences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Wildavsky, A. , 1979. Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Boston:
Little Brown.

Policy Leadership
Bass, Bernard M. , 1990. Bass and Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership: Theory Research, and
Managerial Applications. 3d ed. New York: Free Press.
Berlew, D. E. , 1974. "Leadership and Organizational Excitement." California Management
Review, 17:21–30.
Bennis, Warren and Burt Nanus , 1985. Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge. New York:
Harper and Row.
Bryman, Alan , 1992. Charisma and Leadership in Organizations, Newbury, CA: Sage
Publications.
Bryson, John , P. Bromiley and Y. S. Jung , 1990. "Influences of Context and Process on
Project Planning Success." Journal of Planning Education and Research, 9(3): 183–195.
Bryson, John and Barbara Crosby , 1992. Leadership for the Common Good. San Francisco:
Jossey Bass.
Burns, James McGregor , 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.
Cobb, R. and C. Elder , 1983. Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda
Building. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Crosby, Benjamin , 1993. "Policy Implementation and Strategic Management: The Challenge of
Implementing Policy Change." Washington, D.C.: Implementing Policy Change Project.
Downs, Anthony , 1972. "Up and Down with Ecology—The Issue Attention Cycle." Public
Interest, vol. 12: 38–50.
Fischoff, Baruch , 1983. "Strategic Policy Preferences: A Behavioral Decision Theory
Perspective." Journal of Social Issues, vol. 39, no. 1:133–160.
Fischoff, Baruch , 1985. "Managing Risk Perception." Issues in Science and Technology, vol. 2:
83–96.
Gersick, Connie , 1988. "Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group
Development." Academy of Management Journal, 31(1): 9–41.
Gersick, Connie , 1989. "Marking Time: Predictable Transitions in Task Groups." Academy of
Management Journal, 32(2): 274–309.
Gray, B. and T. M. Hay , 1986. "Political Limits to Interorganizational Consensus and Change."
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, vol. 22: 95–112.
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss , 1983, The Change Masters, New York: Simon & Schuster.
Kingdon, J. , 1984. Agendas, Alternatives and PirtAic Policy. Boston: Little, Brown.
Kouzes, J.M. and B.Z. Posner , 1987. The Leadership Challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Luke, Jeffrey , 1997. Catalytic Leadership: Strategies for an Interconnected World. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Milward, H. B. , 1982. "Interorganizational Policy Systems and Research on Public
Organizations." Administration and Society, 13(4): 457–478.
Mintzberg, H. , D. Raisnghani and A. Theoret , 1976. "The Structure of 'Unstructured' Decision
Processes." Administrative Science Quarterly vol. 21 (June) 246–275.
Neustadt, R. E. , 1991. Presidential Power and Modern Presidents. New York: Free Press.
Nutt, Paul , 1989. Making Tough Decisions. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Pasquero, Jean , 1991. "Superorganizational Collaboration: The Canadian Environmental
Experiment." Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, vol. 27, no. 2 (June) 38–64.
Peters, Thomas J. and R.H. Waterman, Jr. , 1982. In Search of Excellence. New York: Harper
& Row.
Peters, Thomas J. and Nancy Austin , 1985. "A Passion for Excellence," Fortune (May 13)
20–32.
Polsby, N. W. , 1984. Political Innovation in America: The Politics of Policy Initiation. New
Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Roberts, Nancy and R. T. Bradley , 1991. "Stakeholder Collaboration and Innovation: A Study
of Public Policy Initiation at the State Level." Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, vol. 27, no.
2 (June) 209–227.
Roberts, N. and P. King , 1989. "Stakeholder Audit Goes Public." Organizational Dynamics
(Winter) 63–79.
Sabatier, P. A. , 1988. "An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of
Policy-Oriented Learning Therein." Policy Sciences, vol. 21:129–168.
Schon, Donald , 1971. Beyond the Stable State. New York: Norton.
Susskind, L. and J. Cruikshank , 1987. Breaking the Impasse. New York: Basic Books.
Tichy, Noel M. and Mary Anne Devanna , 1990. The Transformational Leader. New York: John
Wiley & Sons.
U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations , 1992. Changing Public Attitudes
on Governments and Taxes: 1989–1992. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Volkema, Roger , 1983. "Problem Formulation in Planning and Design." Management Science
29(6): 639–652.
Weick, K. E. , 1984. "Small Wins: Redefining the Scale of Social Problems." American
Psychologist, vol. 39, no. 1 (January) 40–49.
Wilson, James Q. , 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It.
New York: Basic Books.
Wood, Donna and Barbara Gray , 1991. "Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration."
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, vol. 27, no. 2 (June) 139–162.
Yankelovich, D. , 1992. "How Public Opinion Really Works." Fortune (October 5).

Policy Network
Fox, Charles J. and Hugh T. Miller , 1995. Postmodern Public Administration: Toward
Discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Harmon Michael M. , 1981. Action Theory for Public Administration. New York: Longman.
Heclo, Hugh , 1978. "Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment." In Anthony King , ed.,
The American Political System. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public
Policy Research, Ch. 3, pp. 87–124.
Kaufmann, Franz-Xaver , 1991. "The Relationship Between Guidance, Control, and
Evaluation." In Franz-Xaver Kaufmann , ed., The Public Sector: Challenge for Coordination and
Learning. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Lowi, Theodore , 1969. The End of Liberalism. New York: Norton.
Miller, Hugh T. , 1994. "Post-Progressive Public Administration: Lessons from Policy Networks."
Public Administration Review, 54(4).
Milward, H. Brinton , and Gary L. Wamsley , 1984. "Policy Subsystems, Networks and the Tools
of Public Management." In Robert Eyestone , ed., Public Policy Formation. Greenwich, CT: JAI
Press, pp. 3–25.
Powell, Walter W. , 1990. "Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization."
Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 295–336.
Smith, Martin J. , 1991. "From Policy Communication to Issue Networks: Salmonella in Eggs
and the New Politics of Food." Public Administration, 69 (Summer) 234–255.

Rule
Diver, Colin , 1989. "Regulatory Precision." In Making Regulatory Policy, eds., Keith Hawkins
and John Thomas . Pittsburg: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Kerwin, Cornelius M. , 1994. Rulemaking: How Government Agencies Write Law and Make
Policy. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.
Lowi, Theodore , 1987. "Two Roads to Serfdom." American University Law Review, vol. 36: pp.
295–322.
Warren, Mclinda , 1992. Government Regulation and American Business. St. Louis: Center for
the Study of American Business.
WEFA Group , 1992. The Potential Impact of Selected Airline Tax and Regulatory Changes in
the U.S. Economy. Bala Cynwyd, Pa: WEFA Group.

Intergovernmental Relations
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR) , February 1984. Regulatory
Federalism: Policy, Process, Impact, and Reform. Washington, DC: A-95.
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR) , 1989. Residential Community
Associations: Private Governments in the Intergovernmental System? Washington, DC: A-112.
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR) , 1993. Federal Regulation of
State and Local Governments: The Mixed Record of the 1980s. Washington, DC: A-126.
Anderson, William , 1960. Intergovernmental Relations in Review. Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press.
Anton, Thomas J. , 1989. American Federalism and Public Policy: How the System Works. New
York: Random House.
Bahl, Roy , and Johannes Linn , 1992. Urban Public Finance in Developing Countries. London:
Oxford University Press, published for the World Bank.
Bahl, Roy Johannes Linn , 1994. "Fiscal Decentralization and Intergovernmental Transfers in
Less Developed Countries" Publius: The Journal of Federalism, vol. 24, no. 1: 1–19.
Beer, Samuel H. , 1977. "Political Overload and Federalism." Polity, vol. 10 (Fall): 5–17.
Berman, David R. , 1993. "Relating to Other Governments." Chapter 7 in Charldean Newell ,
ed., The Effective Local Government Manager, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: International
City/County Management Association.
Break, George , 1980. Financing Government in a Federal System. Washington DC: Brookings
Institution.
Brown, Douglas M. , and Earl H. Fry , eds., 1993. States and Provinces in the International
Economy. Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies Press, University of California.
Casella, Jr ., William N. , 1995. "The National Civic League and Intergovernmental Relations."
National Civic Review, (Winter) 42–47.
Cigler, Beverly , 1995. "Governance in the Re—Ing Decade of the 1990s." SIAM
Intergovernmental News, vol. 18, no, 2 (Spring). Section on intergovernmental administration
and management, the American Society for Public Administration.
Cochran, Clark E. et. al., 1993. American Public Policy: An Introduction, 4th ed. New York: St.
Martin's.
Conlan, Timothy , 1988. New Federalism: Intergovernmental Reform from Nixon to Reagan.
Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Denhardt, Robert B. , 1991. Public Administration: An Action Orientation. Pacific Grove, CA:
Brooks/Cole.
Dye, Thomas R. , 1990. American Federalism: Competition Among Governments. Lexington,
MA: D. C. Heath.
Edner, Sheldon , 1976. "Intergovernmental Policy Development: The Importance of Problem
Definition." In Charles O. Jones and Robert D. Thomas , eds., Public Policy Making in a Federal
System. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Elazar, Daniel J. , 1987. Exploring Federalism. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Fry, Earl H. , 1990. "State and Local Governments in the International Arena." The Annals of
the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 509 (May) 118–127.
Gage, Robert W. , 1990. "Key Intergovernmental Issues and Strategies: An Assessment and
Prognosis." In Robert W. Gage and Myrna P. Mandell , eds., Strategies for Managing
Intergovernmental Policies and Networks. New York: Praeger.
Glendening, Parris N. , and Mavis Mann Reeves , 1977. Pragmatic Federalism: An
Intergovernmental View of American Government. Pacific Palisades, CA: Palisades.
Goggin, Malcolm et al., 1990. Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation.
New York: HarperCollins.
Gordon, George J. , 1992. Public Administration in America. 4th ed. New York: St. Martin's.
Graham, Lawrence S. , 1982. "Intergovernmental Relations in Comparative Perspective:
Results from a Five-Country Study." Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American
Society of Public Administration, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Grodzins, Morton , 1966. The American System: A New View of Government in the United
States. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Hamilton, Christopher , and Donald T. Wells , 1990. Federalism, Power, and Political Economy:
A New Theory of Federalism's Impact on American Life. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hanf, Kenneth , and Fritz W. Scharpf , eds., 1978. Interorganizational Policy Making: Limits to
Coordination and Central Control. London: Sage.
Hjern, B. , and David O. Porter , 1981. "Implementation Structures: A New Unit of
Administrative Analysis." Organization Studies, vol. 2, no. 3: 211–227.
Hobbs, Heidi H. , 1994. City Hall Goes Abroad: The Foreign Policy of Local Politics. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jennings, Jr ., Edward T. , and Dale Krane , 1994. "Coordination and Welfare Reform: The
Quest for the Philosopher's Stone." Public Administration Review, vol. 54, no. 4: 341–348.
Kenyon, Daphne , and John Kincaid , eds., 1991. Competition Among States and Local
Government: Efficiency and Equity in American Federalism. Washington, DC: Urban Institute
Press.
Kettl, Donald F. , 1988. Government by Proxy: (Mis?)Managing Federal Programs. Washington,
DC: CQ Press.
Krane, Dale , 1993a. "American Federalism, State Governments, and Public Policy: Weaving
Together Loose Theoretical Threads." PS: Political Science & Politics, vol. 26, no. 2 (June)
186–190.
Krane, Dale , 1993b. "State Efforts to Influence Federal Policy." In Edward T. Jennings, Jr. and
Neal S. Zank , eds., Welfare System Reform: Coordinating Federal, State, and Local Public
Assistance Programs. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Krane, Dale , and Stephen D. Shaffer , 1992. Mississippi Government and Politics: Modernizers
Versus Traditionalists. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Leach, Richard H. , 1970. American Federalism. New York: W. W. Norton.
Lovell, Catherine , 1979. "Where We Are in Intergovernmental Relations and Some of the
Implications." Southern Review of Public Administration, vol. 3: 6–20.
Lund, Michael , 1989. "Between Welfare and the Market: Loan Guarantees as a Policy Tool." In
Lester M. Salamon , ed., Beyond Privatization: The Tools of Government Action. Washington,
DC: Urban Institute Press.
Mandell, Myrna P. and Robert W. Gage , eds., 1988. "Management in the Intergovernmental
System: Networks and Strategies." International Journal of Public Administration, vol. 11, no. 4
(Special Symposium).
Manning, Bayard , 1977. "The Congress, the Executive, and Intermestic Affairs." Foreign
Affairs, vol. 55: 306–324.
Muramatsu, Michio , 1982. A Lateral Competition Model for Japanese Central-Local Relations.
Kyoto, Japan: Kyoto University.
Ostrom, Vincent , Charles Tiebout , and Robert Warren , 1961. "The Organization of
Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry." American Political Science Review,
vol. 55, no. 4 (December) 831–842.
Peterson, Paul E. , 1981. City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Peterson, Paul E. , Barry G. Rabe , and Kenneth K. Wong , 1986. When Federalism Works.
Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Pressman, Jeffrey L. , 1975. Federal Programs and City Politics: The Dynamics of the Aid
Process in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Reagan, Michael , 1972. The New Federalism. New York: Oxford University.
Rhodes, R. A. W. , 1980. "Analysing Intergovernmental Relations." European Journal of
Political Research, vol. 8: 289–322.
Robertson, David B. , and Dennis R. Judd , 1989. The Development of American Public Policy:
The Structure of Policy Restraint. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Rose, John Eck , 1991. "Foreign Relations at the State Level." Journal of State Government,
vol. 64, no. 4 (October/December) 1–8.
Samuels, Richard J. , 1983. The Politics of Regional Policy in Japan: Localities Incorporated?
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schneider, Mark , 1989. The Competitive City: The Political Economy of Suburbia. Pittsburgh,
PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Schneider, William , 1992. "The Suburban Century Begins." The Atlantic Monthly (July) 33–44.
Smith, B. C. , 1985. Decentralization: The Territorial Dimension of the State. London: George
Allen & Unwin.
Stewart, William H. , 1984. Concepts of Federalism. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Stone, Donald C. , 1992. Improving Local Services Through Intergovernmental and
Intersectoral Cooperation. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, Coalition to Improve
Management in State and Local Government.
Treadway, Jack M. , 1985. Public Policy-Making in the American States. New York: Praeger.
Van Horn, Carl E. , and Donald S. Van Meter , 1976. "The Implementation of Intergovernmental
Policy." In Charles O. Jones and Robert D. Thomas , eds., Public Policy Making in a Federal
System. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Walker, David B. , 1981. Toward a Functioning Federalism. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
Walker, David B. , 1995. The Rebirth of Federalism: Slouching Toward Washington. Chatham,
NJ: Chatham House.
Wright, Deil S. , 1988. Understanding Intergovernmental Relations, 3d ed. Pacific Grove, CA:
Brooks/Cole.
Zimmerman, Joseph F. , 1992. Contemporary American Federalism: The Growth of National
Power. New York: Praeger.

Mandates
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations , 1994. Regulatory Federalism: Policy,
Process, Impact, and Reform. Washington, D.C.
Dearborn, Philip M. , 1994. Local Government Responsibilities in Health Care. Washington, DC:
U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.
Fix, Michael , and Daphne Fix , eds., 1990. Coping with Mandates. Washington, DC: Urban
Institute Press.
Koch, Edward , 1980. "The Mandate Millstone." The Public Interest, no. 61 (Fall): 42.
Lovell, Catherine , and Charles Tobin , 1981. "The Mandate Issue," Public Administration
Reviews, vol. 41, (May/June): 318–331.
United States House of Representatives, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology ,
1994. Unfunded Federal Mandates: Who Should Pick Up the Tab? Hearing, March 22.
United States Senate, Committee on Governmental Affairs , 1993. Federal Mandates on State
and Local Governments. Hearing, November 3.
Wright, Deil , 1988. Understanding Intergovernmental Relations, 3d ed. Pacific Grove, CA:
Brooks/Cole.

Government Corporation
Axelrod, Donald , 1992. Shadow Government: The Hidden World of Public Authorities—And
How They Control over $1 Trillion of Your Money . New York: John Wiley.
Caro, Robert , 1974. The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York. New York:
Vintage Books.
Cohen, Julius Henry , 1946. They Builded Better Than They Knew. New York: Julian Messner.
Dimock, Marshall E. , 1934. Government-Operated Enterprises in the Panama Canal Zone.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Doig, Jameson W. , 1983. '"If I See A Murderous Fellow Sharpening a Knife Cleverly' ... The
Wilson Dichotomy and the Public Authority Tradition." Public Administration Review 43
(July/August): 292–304.
Henriques, Diana , 1986. The Machinery of Greed: Public Authority Abuse and What to Do
About It. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Mitchell, Jerry , 1993. "Accountability and the Management of Public Authorities in the United
States," International Review of Administrative Sciences 59 (September): 477–492.
Mitchell, Jerry , ed., 1992. Public Authorities and Public Policy: The Business of Government.
New York: Greenwood Press.
National Academy of Public Administration, (NAPC) 1981. Report on Government Corporations.
Washington, DC: NAPC.
Seidman, Harold , 1954. "The Government Corporation: Organization and Controls." Public
Administration Review 14 (Summer): 183–192.
Selznick, Philip , 1966. TVA and the Grassroots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal
Organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
Thurston, John , 1937. Government Proprietary Corporations in the English-Speaking
Countries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Van Dorn, Harold A. , 1926. Government Owned Corporations. New York: Knopf.
Walsh, Annmarie Hauck , 1978. The Public's Business: The Politics and Practices of
Government Corporations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wettenhall, Roger , 1978. "Public Enterprise in Eight Countries: A Comparative Survey."
Australian Journal of Public Administration 37 (December): 398–403.

Bureaucracy
Bellah, Robert N. , 1957. Tokugawa Religion: The Values of Pre-Industrial Japan. Glencoe, IL.:
Free Press.
Bendix, Reinhard , 1962. Max Weber—An Intellectual Portrait . Garden City, M.Y.: Doubleday.
Elazar, Daniel J. , 1972. American Federalism: A View from the States, 2nd ed. New York:
Crowell.
Goodsell, Charles , 1994. The Case for Bureaucracy: A Public Administration Polemic, 3rd ed.
Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House.
Hummel, Ralph P. , 1977. The Bureaucratic Experience. New York: St. Martin's.
Merton, Robert K. , 1936. "The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action."
American Sociological Review, vol. 1: 894–904.
Selznick, Philip , 1949. TVA and the Grass Roots. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Weber, Max , 1930 [originally, 1904–1905; collected in 1920]. The Protestant Ethic and The
Spirit of Capitalism. Tr. Talcott Parsons . New York: Scribner's. [Die protestantische Ethik und
der "Geist" des Kapitalismus, 1904–1905; collected in Gesammelte Aufsaetze zur
Religionssoziologie, vol. 1. Tuebingen: J. C. B. Mohr]
Weber, Max , 1968. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Eds. Guenther
Roth and Claus Wittich ; trs. Ephraim Fischoff et al. New York: Bedminster Press.

Bureaucrat Bashing
Goodsell, Charles T. , 1994. The Case for Bureaucracy, 3rd ed. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Lane, Larry M. and James F. Wolf , 1990. The Human Resource Crisis in the Public Sector.
New York: Quorum.
Wamsley, Gary L. et al., 1990. Refounding Public Administration. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Wickwar, Hardy , 1991. Power and Service. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Wilson, James Q. , 1989. Bureaucracy. New York: Basic Books.

Bureaupathology
Crozier, Michel , 1964. The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hummel, Ralph , 1982. The Bureaucratic Experience, 2nd ed. New York: St. Martin's.
Merton, Robert K. , 1940. "Bureaucratic Structure and Personality." Social Forces, vol. 17:
560–568.
Parkinson, C. Northcote , 1975. Parkinson's Law. New York: Ballantine.
Peter, Laurence J. and Raymond Hull , 1969. The Peter Principle. New York: William Morrow.
Thompson, Victor A. , 1961. Modern Organization. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Organizational Culture
Czarniawska-Joerges, Barbara , 1997. Narrating the Organization. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Deal, Terrence E. and Allen A. Kennedy , 1982. Corporate Cultures. Reading, MA: Addison-
Wesley.
Frost, Peter J. , Larry F. Moore , Meryl Reis Louis , Craig C. Lundberg , and Joanne Martin ,
1985. Organizational Culture. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Gagliardi, Pasquale , ed., 1990. Symbols and Artifacts. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Golden-Biddle, Karen and Karen Locke , 1993. "Appealing Work: An Investigation in How
Ethnographic Texts Convince." Organization Science 4:4 (November).
Hatch, Mary Jo , 1996. "The Role of the Researcher: An Analysis of Narrative Position in
Organizational Theory." Journal of Management Inquiry vol. 5, no. 4: 359–374.
Hofstede, Geert , 1984. Culture's Consequences. Abridged edition. London: Sage.
Ingersoll, Virginia Hill and Guy B. Adams , 1992. The Tacit Organization. Greenwich, CT: JAI
Press.
Jaques, Elliott , 1951. The Changing Culture of a Factory. London; Tavistock.
Kaufman, Herbert , 1960. The Forest Ranger. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Kroeber, Clyde and Theodore Kluckhohn , 1952. Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and
Definitions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kunda, Gideon , 1992. Engineering Culture. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Levi-Strauss, Claude , 1964. Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
Minow, Martha , 1990. Making All the Difference. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
O'Connor, Ellen , 1995. "Paradoxes of Participation: A Literary Analysis of Case Studies on
Employee Involvement." Organization Studies 15:2.
O'Connor, Ellen , with Mary Jo Hatch , Hayden White , and Mayer Zald , 1995. "Undisciplining
Organizational Studies: A Conversation Across Domains, Methods, and Beliefs." Journal of
Management Inquiry 4:2, 119–136.
Ott, J. Steven , 1989. The Organizational Culture Perspective. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Ouchi, William , 1981. Theory Z. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Peters, Thomas J. and Robert H. Waterman , 1982. In Search of Excellence. New York: Harper
and Row.
Pondy, Louis A. , Peter N. Frost , Gareth Morgan , and Thomas C. Dandridge eds., 1983.
Organizational Symbolism. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Sackmann, Sonja A. , 1991. Cultural Knowledge in Organizations: Exploring the Collective
Mind. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Schein, Edgar H. , 1985. Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schein, Edgar H. , 1992. Organizational Culture and Leadership, 2d ed. San Francisco: Jossey-
Bass.
Selznick, Philip , 1949. TVA and the Grass Roots. New York: Harper and Row.
Smircich, Linda , 1983. "Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis." Administrative
Science Quarterly 28:3, 339–358.
Smircich, Linda , 1995. "Writing Organizational Tales: Reflections on Three Books on
Organizational Culture." Organization Science 6:2, 232–237.
Trice, Harrison M. and Janice M. Beyer , 1993. The Cultures of Work Organizations. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Turner, Barry A. , 1971. Exploring the Industrial Subculture. London: Herder and Herder.
Turner, Barry A. , ed., 1990. Organizational Symbolism. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Van Maanen, John , 1988. Tales of the Field. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Van Maanen, John , 1995. "Style as Theory." Organization Science 6:1.
Weiss, Joseph and Andre Delbecq , 1987. "High-technology Cultures and Management." Group
and Organization Studies 12, 39–54.
White, Jay D. , 1992. "Taking Language Seriously: Toward a Narrative Theory of Knowledge for
Administrative Research." American Review of Public Administration 22:2 (June).
Yanow, Dvora , 1995. "Writing Organizational Tales: Four Authors and Their Stories About
Culture." Organization Science 6:2, 225–226.
Yanow, Dvora , 1996. How Does a Policy Mean? Interpreting Policy mid Organizational Actions.
Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Groupthink
Golembiewski, Robert T. , 1962. The Small Group. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Halberstam, David , 1969. The Best and the Brightest. New York: Random House.
Harvey, Jerry B. , 1988. "The Abilene Paradox: The Management of Agreement."
Organizational Dynamics, vol. 17 (Summer): 17–34.
Janis, Irving L. , 1972. Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy
Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Raven, Bertram , 1974. "The Nixon Group." Journal of Social Issues, vol. 30, no 2: 297–330.
Strachey, James , ed., 1955. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of
Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth.
Zander, Alvin , 1994,1982. Making Groups Effective. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Miles’s Law
Miles, Jr. , Rufus E. , 1976. Awakening from the American Dream. New York: Universe Books.
Miles, Jr. Rufus E. , 1978. "The Origins and Meanings of Miles's Law." Public Administration
Review (September-October) 399–403.
Miles, Jr. Rufus E. , 1979. "Miles Six Other Maxims of Management." Organizational Dynamics
(Summer).

Parkinson’s Law
Parkinson, C. N. , 1957. Parkinson's Law and Other Studies in Administration. Boston:
Houghton Mifflin.

Peter Principle
Carroll, Lewis [pseud.], 1916. Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking
Glass. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Peter, Laurence J. , and Raymond Hull , 1969. The Peter Principle. New York, NY: William
Morrow and Company.

Public Management
Bozeman, Barry , ed., 1993. Public Management: The State of the Art. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey Bass.
Denhardt, Robert B. , 1993. The Pursuit of Significance: Strategies for Managerial Success in
Public Organizations. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Graham, Cole Blease , and Stephen W. Hays , 1993. Managing the Public Organization.
Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
Ingraham, Patricia W. and Carolyn R. Ban , 1986. "Models of Public Management: Are They
Useful to Federal Managers in the 1980s?" Public Administration Review 46(2):152–160.
Ingraham, Patricia W. and Barbara S. Romzek , 1994. New Paradigms for Government: Issues
for the Changing Public Service. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Newland, Chester A. , 1994. "A Field of Strangers in Search of a Discipline: Separatism of
Public Management Research from Public Administration." Public Administration Reinew,
54(5):486–488.
Ott, J. Steven , Albert C. Hyde , and Jay M. Shafritz , eds., 1991. Public Management: The
Essential Readings. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
Perry, James L. , ed., 1989. Handbook of Public Administration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey
Bass.
Rainey, Hal G. , 1991. Understanding and Managing Public Organizations. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey Bass.
Starling, Grover , 1993. Managing the Public Sector. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Swiss, James E. , 1991. Public Management Systems: Monitoring and Managing Government
Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Uveges, Jr., J. A. and L. F. Keller , 1989. "The First One Hundred Years of American Public
Administration: The Study and Practice of Public Management in American Life." In J. Rabin ,
W. B. Hildreth , and G. J. Miller , eds., Handbook of Public Administration. Volume 35. New
York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 1–42.
Waldo, Dwight , 1984. The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American
Public Administration. 2d ed. New York: Holmes & Meier.

Scientific Management
Aitken, A. G. H. , 1960. Taylorism at the Watertown Arsenal: Scientific Management in Action,
1908–1915. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Alford, L. P. , 1932. Henry Lawrence Gantt: Leader in Industry. New York: Harper and Bros.
Cooke, Morris L. , 1918. Our Cities Awake: Notes on Municipal Activities and Administration.
New York: Doubleday.
Copley, Frank B. , 1923. Frederick W. Taylor: Father of Scientific Management. New York:
Harper and Bros.
Gilbreth, Frank B. , 1917. Applied Motion Study. New York: Sturgis and Walton.
Gilbreth, Frank B., Jr. , and Ernestine Gilbreth Carey , 1948. Cheaper by the Dozen. New York:
T. Y. Crowell.
Gilbreth, Frank B. , and Lillian M. Gilbreth , 1916. Fatigue Study: The Elimination of Humanity's
Greatest Unnecessary Waste. New York: Sturgis and Walton.
Gulick, Luther , and Lyndall Urwick , eds., 1937. Papers in the Science of Administration. New
York: Columbia University Press.
Haber, Samuel , 1964. Efficiency and Uplift: Scientific Management in the Progressive Era,
1890–1920. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hoxie, R. F. , 1921. Scientific Management and Labor. New York: D. Appleton.
Mayo, Elton , 1933. The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization. New York: Macmillan.
Merkle, Judith A. , 1980. Management and Ideology: The Legacy of the International Scientific
Management Movement. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.
Nadworny, Milton J. , 1955. Scientific Management and the Unions 1900–1932. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press.
Nelson, Daniel , 1980. Frederick W. Taylor and the Rise of Scientific Management. Madison:
University of Wisconsin Press.
Taylor, Frederick W. , 1895. "A Piece-Rate System, Being a Step Toward Partial Solution of the
Labor Problem." Paper no. 647, Transactions, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, vol.
16: 856–903.
Taylor, Frederick W. , 1967 [1911]. The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: W. W.
Norton.
Taylor, Frederick W. , 1919. Shop Management. New York: Harper Bros.
Urwick, Lyndall , 1949. The Making of Scientific Management. London: Management
Publications Trust.
Urwick, Lyndall , 1956. The Golden Book of Management. London: Newman, Neame.
Wrege, Charles D. , and Ronald G. Greenwood , 1991. Frederick W. Taylor: The Father of
Scientific Management; Myth and Reality. Homewood, IL: Business One Irwin.
Entrepreneurial Public Administration
Bellone, Carl , and George Frederick Goerl , 1992. "Reconciling Public Entrepreneurship and
Democracy." Public Administration Review, vol. 52 (March-April): 130–134.
Doig, Jameson W. , and Erwin C. Hargrove , eds., 1990. Leadership and Innovation
Entrepreneurs in Government. Abridged ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lewis, Eugene , 1984. Public Entrepreneurship. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Moore, Barbara H. , ed., 1983. The Entrepreneur in Local Government. Washington, DC:
International City Management Association.
Osborne, David , and Ted Gaebler , 1992. Reinventing Government. Reading, MA: Addison-
Wesley.

Leadership
Bass, Bernard M. , 1985. Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: Free
Press.
Bass, Bernard M. , 1990. Handbook of Leadership. New York: Free Press.
Blades, Jon W. , and Fred E. Fiedler , 1973. "The Influence of Intelligence, Task Ability and
Motivation on Group Performance." In Organizational Research Technical Report, 76–78.
Seattle: University of Washington.
Blake, Robert R. , and Jane S. Mouton , 1964. The Managerial Grid. Houston: Gulf Publishing.
Burke, Michael J. , and Russell R. Day , 1986. "A Cumulative Study of the Effectiveness of
Managerial Training." Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 71: 232–246.
Burns, James M. , 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Carter, J. , and M. Nixon , 1949. "Ability, Perceptual, Personality and Interest Factors
Associated with Different Criteria of Leadership." Journal of Psychology, vol. 27: 377–388.
Chemers, Martin M. , Robert W. Rice , Eric Sundstrom , and William M. Butler , 1975. "Leader
Esteem for the Least Preferred Co-Worker Scale, Training, and Effectiveness: An Experimental
Investigation." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 31: 401–408.
Conger, Jay A. , 1992. Learning to Lead: The Art of Transforming Managers into Leaders. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fiedler, Fred E. , 1967. A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fiedler, Fred E. , and Martin M. Chemers , 1984. Improving Leadership Effectiveness: The
Leader Match Concept, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
Fiedler, Fred E. Martin M. Chemers , and Joseph E. Garcia , 1987. New Approaches to
Effective Leadership: Cognitive Resources and Organizational Performance. New York: Wiley.
Fiedler, Fred E. Martin M. Chemers Joseph E. Garcia , and Robert J. House , 1988.
"Leadership Theory and Research: A Report of Progress." In Cary L. Cooper and Ivan
Robertson , eds., International Review of Applied Psychology. New York: Wiley, 73–92.
Gibson, Frederick W. , 1992. "Leader Abilities and Group Performance as a Function of Stress."
In Kenneth E. Clark , Miriam B. Clark , and David P. Campbell , eds., Impact of Leadership.
Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership, 333–343.
Gibson, Frederick W. , Frederick W. , Fred E. Fiedler , and Kelley M. Barrett , 1993. "Stress,
Babble, and the Utilization of the Leader's Intellectual Abilities." The Leadership Quarterly, vol.
4:189–208.
Gough, Harrison G. , 1990. "Testing for Leadership with the California Psychological Inventory."
In Kenneth E. Clark and Miriam B. Clark , eds., Measures of Leadership. West Orange, NJ:
Leadership Library of America, 355–379.
Hersey, Paul , and Kenneth H. Blanchard , 1982. Management of Organizational Behavior:
Utilizing Human Resources, 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hogan, Robert , Gordon J. Curphy , and Joyce Hogan , 1994. "What We Know About
Leadership." American Psychologist, vol. 49: 493–504.
Hogan, Robert Gordon J. Curphy Joyce Hogan , Robert , and Joyce Hogan , 1992. Hogan
Personality Inventory Manual. Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.
Hollander, Edwin P. , 1985. "Leadership and Power." In Gardner Lindzey and Elliot Aronson ,
eds., Handbook of Social Psychology, 3d ed. New York: Random House.
Hook, Sidney , 1955. The Hero in History. Boston: Beacon Press.
House, Robert J. , and Terrence R. Mitchell , 1974. "Path-Goal Theory of Leadership." Journal
of Comtemporary Business, vol. 3: 81–97.
Howard, Ann , and Douglas W. Bray , 1988. Managerial Lives in Transition: Advancing Age and
Changing Times. New York: Guilford Press.
Korman, Abraham K. , 1966. "'Consideration,' 'Initiating Structure,' and Organizational
Criteria—A Review." Personnel Psychology, vol. 10: 349–361.
Landy, Frank J. , 1989. Psychology of Work Behavior, 4th ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Meindl, James R. , and Sanford B. Ehrlich , 1987. "The Romance of Leadership and the
Evaluation of Organizational Performance." Academy of Management Journal, vol. 30: 91–109.
Mitchell, Terence R. , Charles M. Smyser , and Stanley E. Weed , 1975. "Locus of Control:
Supervision and Work Satisfaction." Academy of Management Journal, vol. 18: 623–630.
Pfeffer, Jeffrey , 1977. "The Ambiguity of Leadership." Academy of Management Review, vol.
2:104–112.
Salancik, Gerald R. , and Jeffrey Pfeffer , 1977. "Constraints on Administrative Discretion: The
Limited Influence of Mayors on City Budgets." Urban Affairs Quarterly, vol. 12: 447–498.
Simon, Herbert A. , 1947. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Process in
Administrative Organizations. New York: Macmillan.
Stogdill, Ralph M. , 1948. "Personal Factors Associated with Leadership: A Survey of the
Literature." Journal of Psychology, vol. 25: 35–71.
Stogdill, Ralph M. , Ralph M ., and A. E. Coons , 1957. Leader Behavior: Its Description and
Measurement. Columbus: Ohio State University, Bureau of Business Research.
Vroom, Victor H. , and Philip W. Yetton , 1973. Leadership and Decision-Making. Pittsburgh,
PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Weber, Max , 1946. "The Sociology of Charismatic Authority." In H. H. Mills and C. W. Mills ,
eds. and trans., Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Woodword, Joan , 1958. Management and Technology. London: Her Majesty's Stationery
Office.
Yukl, Gary , 1989. Leadership in Organizations, 2d ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Yukl, Gary , 1994. Leadership in Organizations, 3d ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Strategic Planning
Andrews, Kenneth , 1980. The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Homewood, IL: R. D. Irwin.
Ansoff, I. , 1980. "Strategic Issue Management." Strategic Management Journal, vol. 1, no.
2:131–148.
Armstrong, J. S. , 1982. The Value of Formal Planning for Strategic Decisions: Review of
Empirical Research. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 3, no. 2: 197–211.
Backoff, Robert , and Paul Nutt , 1992. Strategic Management for Public and Third-Sector
Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Barry, B. , 1986. Strategic Planning Workbook for Nonprofit Organizations. St. Paul, MN:
Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.
Barzelay, M. , 1992. Breaking Through Bureaucracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Boal, K. B. , and J. M. Bryson , 1987. "Representation, Testing, and Policy Implications of
Planning Processes." Strategic Management Journal, vol. 8: 211–231.
Bolan, R. S. , 1971. "Generalist with a Specialty—Still Valid? Educating the Planner: An Expert
on Experts." Planning 1971: Selected Papers from the ASPO National Conference. Chicago:
American Society of Planning Officials.
Boschken, H. L. , 1988. Strategic Design and Organizational Change, London: The University
of Alabama Press.
Boschken, H. L. , 1992. "Analyzing Performance Skewness in Public Agencies: The Case of
Urban Mass Transit." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 2, no. 3:
265–288.
Boschken, H. L. , 1994. "Organizational Performance and Multiple Constituencies." Public
Administration Review, vol. 54: 308–312.
Bower, J. , C. Bartlett , C. Christensen , A. Pearson and K. Andrews , 1993. Business Policy:
Text and Cases, 7th ed. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
Bracker, J. , 1980. "The Historical Development of the Strategic Management Concept."
Academy of Management Review, vol. 5, no. 2: 219–224.
Braybrook, D. , and C. Lindblom , 1963. A Strategy for Decision: Policy Evaluation as a Social
Process. New York: Free Press.
Bryson, J. M. , 1983. "Representing and Testing Procedural Planning Methods." In I. Masser ,
ed., Evaluating Urban Planning Efforts. Aldershot, England: Gower.
Bryson, J. M. , 1988a. "Strategic Planning: Big Wins and Small Wins." Public Money and
Management, vol. 8, no. 3:11–15.
Bryson, J. M. , 1988b. Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bryson, J. M. , 1995. Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit. Organizations, rev. ed. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bryson, J. M. , 1996. "Understanding Options for Strategic Planning." In J. Perry , ed.,
Handbook of Public Administration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 479–598.
Bryson, J. M. , and P. Bromiley , 1993. "Critical Factors Affecting the Planning and
Implementation of Major Projects." Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14: 319–337.
Bryson, J. , P. Bromily , and Y. S. Jung , 1990. "Influences of Context and Process on Project
Planning Success." Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 9, no. 3:183–195.
Bryson, J. M. , and B. C. Crosby , 1992. Leadership for the Common Good. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
Bryson, J. M. , and A. L. Delbecq , 1979. "A Contingent Approach to Strategy and Tactics in
Project Planning." Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 45: 167–179.
Bryson, J. M. , and R. C. Einsweiler , eds., 1988. Strategic Planning for Public
Purposes—Threats and Opportunities for Planners. Chicago, IL, and Washington, DC: Planners
Press of the American Planning Association.
Bryson, J. M. , and C. B. Finn , 1995. "Development and Use of Strategy Maps to Enhance
Organizational Performance." In A. Halachmi , and G. Bouckaert , eds., The Challenge of
Management in a Changing World. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 247–280.
Bryson, J. M. , R. E. Freeman , and W. D. Roering , 1986. "Strategic Planning in the Public
Sector: Approaches and Directions." In B. Checkoway , ed., Strategic Perspectives on Planning
Practice. Lexington, MA.: Lexington Books, pp. 65–85.
Bryson, J. M. , A. H. Van de Ven , and W. D. Roering , 1987. "Strategic Planning and the
Revitalization of the Public Service." In R. Denhardt and E. Jennings , eds., Toward a New
Public Service. Columbia: Extension Publications, University of Missouri, pp. 55–75.
Chakravarthy, B. , and P. Lorange , 1991. Managing the Strategy Process: A Framework for the
Multi-Biisiness Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Checkland, P. B. , 1981. Systems Thinking, System Practice, Chichester, England: Wiley.
Checkland, P. B. , and J. Scholes , 1991. Soft Systems Methodology in Action. New York:
Wiley.
Checkoway, B. , ed., 1986. Strategic Perspectives on Planning Practice. Lexington, MA:
Lexington Books.
Christensen, K. S. , 1985. "Coping with Uncertainty in Planning". Journal of the American
Planning Association, vol. 51, no. 1: 63–73.
Christensen, K. S. , 1993. "Teaching Savvy." Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol.
12, no. 3: 202–212.
Churchman, C. W. , 1968. The Systems Approach. NY: Dell.
Cohen, S. , and R. Brand , 1993. Total Quality Management in Government. San Francisco,
CA: Jossey-Bass.
Coucheu, T. , 1993. Making Quality Happen. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Dutton, J. , and S. Ashford , 1993. "Selling Issues to Top Management." Academy of
Management Review, vol. 18, no. 3: 397–428.
Dutton, J. , and S. Jackson , 1987. "Categorizing Strategic Issues: Links to Organizational
Action." Academy of Management Review, vol. 12, no. 1: 76–90.
Eadie, Douglas , 1986. "Strategic Issue Management: Improving the Council-Manager
Relationship." ICMA MIS Report, vol. 18, no. 6: 2–12.
Eadie, Douglas , 1989. "Building the Capacity for Strategic Management." In J. L. Perry , ed.,
Handbook of Public Administration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Eden, C. , 1989. "Using Cognitive Mapping for Strategic Options Development and Analysis
(SODA)." In J. Rosenhead , ed., Rational Analysis for a Problematic World. New York: Wiley.
Eden, Colin , and Chris Huxham , 1988. "Action-Oriented Strategic Management." Journal of
the Operational Research Society, vol. 39, no.. 10: 889–899.
Fesler, J. , and D. Kettl , 1994. The Politics of the Administrative Process, 2d ed. Chatham, NJ:
Chatham House.
Frederickson, James , 1984. "The Comprehensiveness of Strategic Decision Processes,"
Academy of Management Journal, vol. 39 (10): 445–466.
Frederickson, James , and R. R. Mitchell , 1984. "Strategic Decision Processes:
Comprehensiveness and Performance in an Industry with an Unstable Environment." Academy
of Management Journal, vol. 27, no. 2: 399–423.
Freeman, R. E. , 1984. "Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach." Boston: Pitman.
Friend, J. , and A. Hickling , 1987. Planning Under Pressure. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Goold, M. , A. Campbell , and K. Luchs , 1993a. "Strategies and Styles Revisited: Strategic
Planning and Financial Control." Long Range Planning, vol. 26, no. 5: 49–60.
Goold, M. A. Campbell K. Luchs , 1993b. "Strategies and Styles Revisited: Strategic Control
Companies." Long Range Planning, vol. 26, no. 6:150–162
Gore, A. , 1993. The Gore Report on Reinventing Government. New York: Times Books.
Gray, B. , 1989. Collaborating: finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hale, Sandra , and Mary Williams , eds., 1989. Managing Change; A Guide to Producing
Innovation from Within. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
Hambrick, D. C. , 1982. "Environmental Scanning and Organizational Strategy." Strategic
Management Journal, vol. 3, no. 2:159–174.
Hammer, M. , and J. Champy , 1993. Reengineering the Corporation. New York: Harper
Business.
Hampden-Turner, C. , 1990. Corporate Culture. Hutchinson, Great Britain: Economist Books.
Harrigan, K. , 1981, "Barriers to Entry and Competitive Strategies." Strategic Management
Journal, vol. 2: 395–412.
Hax, A. C. , and N. S. Majiluf , 1984. Strategic Management: An Integrative Approach.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Heath, R. L. , 1988. Strategic Issues Management. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Henderson, B. , 1979. Henderson on Corporate Strategy. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
Howe, E. , 1980. "Role Choices of Urban Planners." Journal of the American Planning
Association, vol. 46: 398–409.
Howe, E. , and J. Kaufman , 1979. "The Ethics of Contemporary American Planners." Journal of
the American Planning Association, vol. 45: 243–255.
Hurst, D. K. , 1986. "Why Strategic Management Is Bankrupt." Organizational Dynamics, vol.
15: 4–27.
Huxham, Chris , 1991. "Facilitating Collaboration: Issues in Multi-Organizational Group
Decision Support." Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 42: 1037–1046.
Huxham, Chris , 1993. "Pursuing Collaborative Advantage." Journal of the Operational
Research Society, vol. 44, 44: 599–611.
Jackson, S. E. , and J. E. Dutton , "Discerning Threats and Opportunities." Administrative
Science Quarterly, vol. 33: 370–387.
Jackson, P. M. , and Bob Palmer , 1992. Performance Measurement: A Management Guide.
Leicester, England: Management Center University of Leicester.
Kaufman, J. L. 1979. "The Planner as Interventionist in Public Policy Issues." In R. Burchell and
G. Sternlieb , eds., Planning Theory in the 1980s. New Brunswick: Center for Urban Policy
Research.
Kemp, R. L. , 1992. Strategic Planning in Local Government: A Casebook. Chicago, IL:
American Planning Association.
Kemp, R. L. , 1993. Strategic Planning for Local Government. Jefferson: Mcfarland and
Company.
Lindblom, C. E. , 1959. "The Science of Muddling Through." Public Administration Review, vol.
19: 79–88.
Lindblom, C. E. , 1965. The Intelligence of Democracy. New York: Free Press.
Lindblom, C. E. , 1977. Politics and Markets. New York: Free Press.
Lindblom, C. E. , 1980. The Policy-Making Process. 2d ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Linden, R. M. , 1994. Seamless Government: A Practical Guide to Re-Engineering in the Public
Sector. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Lorange, P. , 1980. Corporate Planning: An Executive Viewpoint. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
MacMillan, I. , 1983., "Competitive Strategies for Not-for-Profit Agencies." Advances in Strategic
Management, vol. 1: 61–82.
Mintzberg, H. , 1983. Poxver in and Around Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Mintzberg, H. , 1987. "Crafting Strategy." Harvard Business Review, vol. 87, no. 4: 66–75.
Mintzberg, H. , 1990. "The Design School: Reconsidering the Basic Premises of Strategic
Management." Strategic Management Journal, vol. 11:171–195.
Mintzberg, H. , 1994. The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. New York: Free Press.
Mintzberg, H. , and James Quinn , 1991. The Strategy Process, 2d ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
Mintzberg, H. , and J. A. Waters , 1985. "Of Strategies, Deliberate and Emergent." Strategic
Management Journal, vol. 6: 257–272.
Montanari, J. R. , and J. S. Bracker , 1986. "The Strategic Management Process." Strategic
Management Journal, vol. 7, no. 3: 251–265.
National Governors Association , 1993. An Action Agenda to Redesign State Government.
Washington, D.C.: National Governors Association.
Nutt, Paul , 1992. Managing Planned Change. New York: Macmillan.
Nutt, Paul , and R. W. Backoff , 1987. "A Strategic Management Process for Public and Third-
Sector Organizations." Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 53:44–57.
Nutt, Paul R. W. Backoff , 1993. "Organizational Publicness and Its Implications for Strategic
Management." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 3, no. 2: 209–231.
Nutt, Paul , and R. W. Backoff , 1995. "Strategy for Public and Third Sector Organizations."
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 5, no. 2:189–211.
Olsen, J. B. , and D. C. Eadie , 1982. The Game Plan: Governance with Foresight. Washington,
DC: Council of State Planning Agencies.
Osborne, D. , and T. Gaebler , 1992. Reinventing Government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
O'Toole, J. , 1985. Vanguard Management, New York: Doubleday.
Peters, G. , 1995. The Politics of Bureaucracy, 4th ed. New York: Longman.
Peters, T. J. , and R. H. Waterman, Jr. , 1982. In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's
Best-Run Companies. Hew York: Harper & Row.
Pettigrew, A. , 1977. "Strategy Formulation as a Political Process." International Studies in
Management and Organization, vol. 7, no. 2: 78–87.
Pettigrew, A. , E. Ferlie , and L. Mckee , 1992. Shaping Strategic Change. Newbury Park, CA:
Sage.
Pflaum, A. , and T. Delmont , 1987. "External Scanning—A Tool for Planners." Journal of the
American Planning Association, vol. 53, no. 1: 56–67.
Pierce, Steal , 1989. Urban Challenges: A Vision for the Future. Phoenix, AZ: Arizonel
Republic, Phoenix Gazette.
Pinchot, G., III , 1985. Enterpreneuring. New York: Harper & Row.
Porter, M. , 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors.
New York: Free Press.
Porter, M. , 1985. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New
York: Free Press.
Porter, M. , 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.
Porter, M. 1994. Competitive Strategies for Changing Industries. Boston, MA: Harvard Business
School Management Productions.
Quinn, J. B. , 1980. Strategies for Change: Logical Incrementalism. Homewood, IL: R. D. Irwin.
Reich, R. R. , 1992. The Work of Nations. New York: Vintage.
Ring, Peter , 1988. "Strategic Issues and Where Do They Come From?" In John Bryson and
Robert Einsweiler , Strategic Planning for Public Purposes—Threats and Opportunities for
Planners . American Planning Association, pp. 69–83.
Rue, L. W. , and P. G. Holland , 1986. Strategic Management: Concepts and Experiences. New
York: McGraw-Hill.
Sager, T. , 1994. Communicative Planning Theory. Aldershot, United Kingdom: Avebury.
Schein, E. , 1988. Process Consultation. Vol. 1: Its Role in Organization Development.
Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Schein, E. , 1992. Organizational Culture and Leadership, 2d ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-
Bass.
Senge, P. M. , 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization.
New York: Doubleday.
Stone, M. , and W. Crittenden , 1993. " A Guide to Journal Articles on Strategic Management in
Nonprofit Organizations." Nonprofit Management and Leadership, vol. 4:193–213.
Susskind, L. E. , and J. Cruikshank , 1987. Breaking the Impasse: Consensual Approaches to
Resolving Public Disputes. New York: Basic Books.
Swanstrom, T. , 1987. "The Limits of Strategic Planning for Cities." Journal of Urban Affairs, vol.
9:139–157.
Taylor, B. , 1984. "Strategic Planning—Which Style Do You Need?" Long Range Planning, vol.
17: 51–62.
Thompson, F. , and L. R. Jones , 1994. Reinventing the Pentagon: How the New Public
Management Can Bring Institutional Renewal. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Waterman, R. H. , 1987. The Renewal Factor. New York: Bankam.
Waterman, R. H., Jr. , T. J. Peters , and J. R. Phillips , 1980. "Structure Is Not Organization."
Business Horizons, 14–26.
Widener, R. , et al., 1992. Divided Cities in the Global Economy: Human Strategies. Columbia,
SC: PASRAS Fund.
Wildavsky, A. , 1979a. The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
Wildavsky, A. , 1979b. Speaking Truth to Power. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
Wind, Y. , and V. Mahajan , 1981. "Designing Product and Business Portfolios." Harvard
Business Review, vol. 59:155–165.
Winer, M. , and K. Ray , 1994. Collaboration Handbook. St. Paul, MN: Amherst H. Wilder
Foundation.

Mission Statement
Bryson, John M. , 1991. Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass. (See especially Chapter 5, "Clarifying Organizational Mandates and
Missions.")
Drucker, Peter F. , 1990. "Lessons for Successful Nonprofit Governance." Nonprofit
Management and Leadership, vol. 1, no. 1:7–14.
Espy, Siri N. , 1986. Handbook of Strategic Planning for Nonprofit Organizations. New York:
Praeger. (See especially Chapter 3, "Corporate Identity and Directions.")
Kearns, Kevin P. , 1992. "From Comparative Advantage to Damage Control: Clarifying
Strategic Issues Using SWOT Analysis." Nonprofit Management and Leadership, vol. 3, no.
1:3–22.

Productivity
Balfour, Danny L. , and Barton Wechsler , 1991. "Commitment, Performance, and Productivity
in Public Organizations." Public Productivity and Management Review, 15 (1): 355–368.
Ban, Carolyn , Sue R. Faerman , and Norma M. Riccucci , 1992. "Productivity and the
Personnel Process." In Marc Holzer , ed., Public Productivity Handbook. New York: Marcel
Dekker, pp. 401–423.
Barnekov, Timothy K. , and Jeffrey A. Raffel , 1992. "Public Management of Privatization." In
Marc Holzer , ed., Public Productivity Handbook. New York; Marcel Dekker, pp. 99–115.
Daly, Dennis M. , 1992. "Pay for Performance, Performance Appraisal, and Total Quality
Management." Public Productivity and Management Review, 16:2 (Fall) 39–52.
Epstein, Paul , and Alan Leidner , 1990. "Productivity Forum for Computer Technology." Public
Productivity and Management Review, 14:2 (Winter) 211–220.
Guy, Mary E. , 1992. "Productive Work Environment." In Marc Holzer , ed., Public Productivity
Handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 321–335.
Hatry, Harry P. , and Donald M. Fisk , 1992. "Measuring Productivity in the Public Sector." In
Marc Holzer , ed., Public Productivity Handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 139–160.
Holzer, Marc , ed., 1992. Public Productivity Handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Holzer, Marc , and Vatche Gabrielian , eds., 1995. Case Studies in Productive Public
Management: Capacity Building in Government. Burke, VA: Chatelain Press.
Hyde, Albert C. , 1992. "Implications of Total Quality Management for the Public Sector." Public
Productivity and Management Review, 16:1 (Fall) 23–24. Also see Hyde, "The Proverbs of
Total Quality Management," pp. 25–38.
Keehley, Pat , and Steve Medlin , 1991. "Productivity Enhancements Through Quality
Innovations." Public Productivity and Management Review, 15(2): 217–228.
LOGIN (Local Government Information Network) . St. Paul, Minnesota: The Norris Institute.
Milakovich, Michael E. , 1996. "Total Quality Management for Public Service Productivity
Improvement." In Marc Holzer , ed., Public Productivity Handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker,
pp. 577–602.
Mizaur, Donald , 1992. Unpublished paper presented to the Fifth National Conference on Public
Sector Productivity in Newark, New Jersey. Charlottesville, Virginia, Federal Quality Institute.
Poister, Theodore H. , ed., 1988. "Success Stories in Revitalizing Public Agencies." Public
Productivity Review, 11:3 (Spring) 27–104.
Public Employees Roundtable , 1990. "Unsung Heroes" (newsletter 1987–1990) and brochures.
Washington, DC.
Public Productivity and Management Review. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Savas, E. S. , 1992. "Privatization and Productivity." In Marc Holzer , ed., Public Productivity
Handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 79–98.
Taylor, Paul W. , 1991. "Working with Quality at the New York State Department of
Transportation." Public Productivity and Management Review, 15:2 (Winter) 205–212.
Washnis, George J. , ed., 1980. Productivity Improvement Handbook for State and Local
Government. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Quality Circles
Adam, Everett E., Jr. , 1991. "Quality Circle Performance." Journal of Management, vol. 1, no. 1
(March): 25–40.
Brennan, Maire , 1992. "Mismanagement and Quality Circles: How Middle Managers Influence
Direct Participation." Management Decision, vol. 30, no. 6 (November): 35–46.
Buch, Kimberly , 1992. "Quality Circles and Employee Withdrawal Behaviors: A Cross-
Organizational Study." Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, vol. 28, no. 1 (March): 62–74.
Buch, Kimberly , and Raymond Spangler , 1990. "The Effects of Quality Circles on Performance
and Promotions." Human Relations, vol. 43, no. 6 (June); 573–583.
Fitzgerald, Laurie , and Joseph Murphy , 1982. Quality Circles: A Strategic Approach. San
Diego: University Associates.
Gosh, B. C. , and Lim Kia Song , 1991. "Structures and Processes of Company Quality Control
Circles (QCCs): An Explanatory Study of Japan, the USA and Singapore." Management
Decision, vol. 29, no. 7 (December): 45–54.
Heath, Phillip M. , 1990. "Quality—And How to Achieve It." Management Decison, vol. 28, no.
8: 42–47.
Kline James J ., 1992. "Total Quality Management in Local Government." Government Finance
Review, vol. 8, no. 4 (August): 7–12.
Kline James J , 1993. "Quality Tools Are Applicable to Local Government." Government
Finance Review, vol. 9, no. 4 (August): 15–20.
Lammers, Cornelis J. , and David J. Hickson , 1979. "A Cross-National and CrossInstitutional
Typology of Organizations." In Cornelis J. Lammers and David J. Hickson , eds., Organizations
Alike and Unlike: International and Interinstitutional Studies in the Sociology of Organizations.
London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
McKenna, Joseph P. , 1993. "Total Quality Government: More than Political Fashion." Industry
Week, vol. 242, no. 12 (June 21): 44–46.
Reynolds, Larry , 1992. "The Feds Join the Quality Movement." Management Review, vol. 81,
no. 4 (April): 39–41.
Steel Robert P. , Kenneth R. Jennings , and James I. Lindsey , 1990. "Quality Circle Problem
Solving and Common Cents: Evaluation Study Findings from a United States Mint." Journal of
Applied Behavior Science, vol. 26, no. 3 (August): 365–382.
Watanabe, Susumu , 1991. "The Japanese Quality Control Circle: Why It Works." International
Labour Review, vol. 130, no. 1 (January-February): 57–81.

Public Enterprise
Aharoni, Yair , 1986. The Evolution and Management of State-Oxuned Enterprises. Cambridge,
MA: Ballinger.
Corkery, Joan , Colm O Nuallain and Roger Wettenhall , eds., 1994. Public Enterprise Boards:
What They Are and What They Do. Hong Kong: Asian Journal of Public Administration for
International Association of Schools and Institutes of Administration.
Dawson, R. MacG. , 1992. The Principle of Official Independence. London & Toronto: King.
Eggleston, R. W. , 1932. State Socialism in Victoria. London: King.
Einaudi, M. , M. Bye and E. Rossi , 1955. Nationalization in France and Italy. Ithaca: Cornell
University Press.
Fernandes, Praxi and Pavle Sicherl , eds., 1981. Seeking the Personality of Public Enterprise.
Ljubljana: International Center for Public Enterprises in Developing Countries.
Floyd, Robert H. , Clive S, Gray and R.P. Short , 1984. Public Enterprise in Mixed Economies:
Some Macroeconomic Aspects. Washington: International Monetary Fund.
Friedmann, W. and J. F. Garner , eds., 1970. Government Enterprise: A Comparative Study.
London: Stevens.
Glaeser, Martin G. , 1957. Public Utilities in American Capitalism. New York: Macmillan.
Goodman, Edward , 1951. Fawns of Public Ownership and Control, London: Christophers.
Hanson, A. H. , 1956. The Management of Public Utilities by Local Authorities. The Hague:
Nijhoff for International Union of Local Authorities.
Hanson, A. H. , 1959. Public Enterprise and Economic Development. London: Routledge and
Kegan Paul.
Hanson, A. H. ,. et al., 1968. Organization and Administration of Public Enterprises:, Selected
Papers. New York: United Nations.
Jones, Leroy P. , ed., 1982. Public Enterprise in Less Developed Countries. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Kaul, Mohan , et al., 1991. Public Enterprise Management: Strategies for Success. 2 vols.
London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
Khera, S. S. , 1963. Government in Business. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.
Lilienthal, David E. , 1944. TVA: Democracy on the March. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Macmahon, A. W. , and W. R. Dittmar , 1939. "Autonomous Public Enterprise: The German
Railways." Political Science Quarterly, vol. 54 (December): 481–513.
Mascarenhas, R. C. , 1982. Public Enterprise in New Zealand. Wellington: Institute of Public
Administration.
Mishra, R. K. , and S. Ravishankar , eds. 1986. Public Enterprises in the World. Bombay:
Himalaya.
Mitchell, Jerry , ed., 1992. Public Authorities and Public Policy: The Business of Government.
New York: Praeger.
Musolf, Lloyd D. , 1959. Public Ownership and Accountability: The Canadian Experience.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Powell, Victor , 1987. Improving Public Enterprise Performance: Concepts and Techniques.
Geneva: International Labour Office.
Ramamurti, Ravi , and Raymond Vernon , eds., 1991. Privatization and Control of State-Owned
Enterprises. Washington: World Bank.
Ramanadham, V. V. , 1984. The Nature of Public Enterprise. London: Croom Helm.
Ramanadham, V. V. , ed., 1986. Public Enterprise: Studies in Organizational Structure. London:
Cass.
Robson, W. A. , 1962. Nationalized Industry and Public Ownership. 2d ed. London: Allen &
Unwin.
Sadique, Abu Sharaf H. K. , ed., 1976. Public Enterprise in Asia: Studies on Coordination and
Control. Kuala Lumpur: Asian Centre for Development Administration.
Seidman, Harold , 1954. "The Government Corporation: Organization and Controls." Public
Administration Review, vol. 14 (Summer): 183–192.
Seidman, Harold , 1983. "Public Enterprise Autonomy: Need for a New Theory." International
Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 49: 65–72.
Seidman, Harold , 1988. "The Quasi World of the Federal Government." The Brookings Review,
vol. 6 (Summer): 23–27.
Sharkansky, Ira , 1979. Wither the State: Politics and Public Enterprise in Three Countries,
Chatham, NJ: Chatham.
Shirley, Mary , and John Nellis , 1991. Public Enterprise Reform: The Lessons of Experience.
Washington, DC: World Bank.
Suarez, Ricardo Acosta , ed., 1985. The Management of Interlinkages. Ljubljana: International
Center for Public Enterprises in Developing Countries.
Thurston, John , 1937. Government Proprietary Corporations in the English-Speaking
Countries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
UN Development Administration Division , 1986. The Role of the Public Sector in the
Mobilization of Domestic Financial Resources in Developing Countries. New York; United
Nations.
UN Technical Assistance Administration , 1954. Some Problems in the Organization and
Administration of Public Enterprises in the Industrial Field. New York: United Nations.
Verney, D. V. , 1959. Public Enterprise in Sweden. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Vintera, Jan , et al., 1967. The Role of Public Enterprises in the Formulation and
Implementation of Development Plans in Centrally Planned Economies. New York: United
Nations.
Vratusa, Anton , et al., 1985. Essays on Relations Between Governments and Public
Enterprises. Ljubljana: International Center for Public Enterprises in Developing Countries.
Walsh, Annmarie Hauck , 1978. The Public's Business: The Politics and Practice of
Government Corporations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wettenhall, Roger , 1983. "Privatization: A Shifting Frontier Between Private and Public
Sectors." Current Affairs Bulletin (Sydney), vol. 60 (November); 14–22.
Wettenhall, Roger , 1987. Public Enterprise and National Development: Selected Essays.
Canberra: Royal Australian Institute of Public Administration, Australian Capital Territory
Division.
Wettenhall, Roger , 1990. "Australia's Daring Experiment with Public Enterprise.'" In Alexander
Kouzmin and Nicholas Scott , eds., Dynamics in Australian Public Management: Selected
Essays. Melbourne: Macmillan.
Wettenhall, Roger 1993. "Public Enterprise in an Age of Privatization." Current Affairs Bulletin
(Sydney), vol. 69 (February): 4–12.
Wettenhall, Roger , and O Nuallain, Colm , eds., 1990. Public Enterprise Performance
Evaluation: Seven Country Studies. Brussels: International Institute of Administrative Studies.
Public Personnel Administration
Ban, Carolyn , and Norma M. Riccucci , eds., 1991. Public Personnel Management. New York:
Longman Publishing.
Executive Office of the President, National Performance Review , 1993. From Red Tape to
Results: Creating Government That Works Better and Costs Less. Washington, DC:.U.S.
Government Printing Office.
Heady, Ferrel , 1991. Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective. 4th ed. New York:
Marcel Dekker.
Heclo, Hugh , 1977. A Government of Strangers, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Henry, Nicholas , 1995. Public Administration and Public Affairs. 6th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
Ingraham, Patricia W. , and David H. Rosenbloom , eds., 1992. The Promise and Paradox of
Civil Service Reform. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Klingner, Donald E. , and John Nalbandian , 1993. Public Personnel Management: Contexts
and Strategies. 3d ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
National Commission on the Public Service Task Force , 1989. Rebuilding the Public Service.
Washington, DC: National Commission on the Public Service.
Sylvia, Ronald D. , 1994. Public Personnel Administration. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Taylor, Frederick W. , 1967. The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Norton.
Thompson, Frank , ed., 1979. Classics of Public Personnel Administration. Oak Park, IL: Moore
Publishing.
Weber, Max , 1946. Essays in Sociology. Trans, by H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills . New York.:
Oxford University Press.

Mentoring
Aldag, R. J. , and T. M. Stearns , 1987. Management. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western
Publishing, 834–835.
Chao, G. , P. Walz , and P. Gardner , 1992. "Formal and Informal Mentorships: A Comparison
of the Mentoring Functions and Contrasts with Nonmentored Counterparts." Personnel
Psychology, vol. 45 (Autumn): 619–636.
Dreher, F. , and R. Ash , 1990. "A Comparative Study of Mentoring Among Men and Women in
Managerial, Professional, and Technical Positions." Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 75
(Summer): 539–546.
Hale, Mary M. , 1992. "Mentoring." In Mary E. Guy , ed., Women and Men of the States.
Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe, 89–108.
Hays, Steve W. , and Richard C. Kearney , 1995. "Promotion of Personnel—Career
Advancement." In Jack Rabin , Thomas Vocino , W. Bartley Hildreth , and Gerald Miller , eds.,
Handbook of Public Personnel Administration. New York: Marcel Dekker, 499–529.
Henderson, Dee , 1985. "Enlightened Menoring: A Characteristic of Public Management
Professionalism." Public Administration Review, vol. 45 (November-December): 857–863.
Kram, K. E. , 1985. Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organizational Life.
Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Phillips-Jones, L. , 1983. "Establishing a Formalized Mentoring Program." Training and
Development Journal (February): 38–42.
Ragins, Belle R. , and John L. Cotton , 1993. "Wanted: Mentors for Women." Personnel Journal
(April): 20.
Roche, G. , 1979. "Much Ado About Mentors." Harvard Business Review, vol. 57 (January-
February): 14–28.
Vertz, L. , 1985. "Women, Occupational Advancement, and Mentoring: An Analysis of One
Public Organization." Public Administration Review, vol. 45 (May-June): 415–422.
Pay-for-Performance
Graham-Moore, Brian , and Timothy L. Ross , 1990. Gainsharing: Plans for Improwing
Performance. Washington, DC: BNA Books.
Greiner, John M. , Harry P. Hatry , Margo P. Koss , Annie P. Millar , and Jane P. Woodward ,
1981. Productivity and Motivation: A Review of State and Local Government Initiatives.
Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
Lawler III , Edward E ., 1990. Strategic Pay: Aligning Organizational Strategies and Pay
Systems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Milkovich, George T. , and Alexandra K. Wigdor , eds., with Ranae F. Broderick and Anne S.
Mavor , 1991. Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay.
Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Workforce Diversity
ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) , 1990. P.L. 101–336, July 26, 1990.
Bernhard, H. , and C. Ingols , 1988. "Six Lessons for the Corporate Classroom." Harvard
Business Review, vol. 88 (September-October): 40–48.
Deming, W. Edwards , 1988. Out of the Crisis. Cambridge: MIT Center for Advanced
Engineering Study.
Denison, Daniel , 1990. Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness. New York: Wiley.
Doeringer, Peter , and Michael Piore , 1975. "Unemployment and the 'Dual Labor Market.'" The
Public Interest, vol. 38: 67–79.
French, Wendell , and C. Bell , 1990. Organizational Development. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs,
NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hudson Institute , 1988. Opportunity 2000: Creating Affirmative Action Strategies for a
Changing Workforce. Indianapolis: Hudson Institute.
International City Management Association , 1989. Service Delivery in the 90s: Alternative
Approaches for Local Governments. Washington, DC: ICMA.
Jamieson, David , and Julie O'Mara , 1991. Managing Workforce 2000. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
Johnston, W. , and A. Packer , 1987. Workforce 2000: Work and Workers for the Twenty-First
Century. Indianapolis: Hudson Institute.
Klingner, Donald , and John Nalbandian , 1998. Public Personnel Management: Contexts and
Strategies. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Loden, Marilyn , and Judy Rosener , 1991. W orkforce America! Managing Employee Diversity
as a Vital Resource. Homewood, IL: Business One Irwin.
Morgan, H. , and K. Tucker , 1991. Companies That Care. New York: Fireside.
National Performance Review , 1993. Reinventing Human Resource Management.
Washington, DC: National Performance Review, Office of the Vice President.
Rosow, J. , and R. Zager , 1988. Training—The Corporate Edge . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-
Bass.
Rubaii-Barrett, Nadia , and Ann Beck , 1993. "Minorities in the Majority: Implications for
Managing Cultural Diversity." Public Personnel Management, vol. 22 (Winter): 503–522.
Schein, Edgar , 1981. Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-
Bass.
Solomon, Charlene , 1993. "Managing Today's Immigrants." Personnel Journal, vol. 72
(February): 57–65.
Thomas, R. Roosevelt , 1990. "From Affirmative Action to Affirming Diversity." Harvard
Business Review, vol. 68: 107–117.
Glass Ceiling
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss , 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Task Force on Barriers to Women in the Public Service , 1990. Beneath the Veneer: The
Report of the Task Force on Barriers to Women in the Public Service. Ottawa: Canadian
Government Publishing Centre.
U.S. Department of Labor , 1991. A Report on the Glass Ceiling Initiative. Washington, DC:
U.S. Department of Labor.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board , 1992. A Question of Equity: Women and the Glass
Ceiling in the Federal Government. Washington, DC: U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board.

Financial Administration
Aronson, J. Richard , and Eli Schwartz , 1987, Management Policies in Local Government
Finance. Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
Buchanan, James M. , and Gordon Tullock , 1965. The Calculus of Consent : Ann Arbor, MI:
Ann Arbor Paperbacks.
Coe, Charles K. , 1989. Public Financial Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hausman, Jerry A. , ed., 1993. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. New York: North
Holland.
Internal Control Standards Committee , International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions
, 1992. Guidelines for Internal Control Standards. Washington, DC: International Organization
of Supreme Audit Institutions.
Mikesell, John L. , 1995. Fiscal Administration, Analysis and Applications for the Public Sector.
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Musgrave, Richard A. , 1959. The Theory of Public Finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Petersen, John E. , and Dennis R. Strachota , eds., 1991. Local Government Finance,
Concepts and Practices. Chicago: Government Finance Officers Association.
Shoup, Carl S. , 1969. Public Finance. Chicago: Aldine.
Steiss, Alan Walter , 1989. Financial Management in Public Organizations. Pacific Grove, CA:
Brooks Cole.

Congressional Budget Process


Doyle, Richard , and Jerry McCaffery . "The Budget Enforcement Act of 1990: The Path to No-
Fault Budgeting." Public Budgeting and Finance, vol. 11, no. 1:25–40.
Fenno, Richard , 1966. The Power of the Purse. Boston: Little Brown.
Fisher, Louis , 1987. The Politics of Shared Power: Congress and the Executive. 2nd ed.
Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.
Hanushek, Eric , 1986. "Formula Budgeting: The Economics and Analytics of Fiscal Policy
Under Rules." Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, vol. 6, no. 1.
Ippolito, Dennis , 1981. Congressional Spending. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Joyce, Philip G. , and Robert D. Reischauer . "Deficit Budgeting: The Federal Budget Process
and Budget Reform." Harvard Journal on Legislation, vol. 29:429–453.
Lee, Jr ., Robert D. , and Ronald Johnson , 1989. Public Budgeting Systems. Rockville, MD:
Aspen Publishers.
TeToup, Tance , 1980. The Fiscal Congress. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Meyers, Roy , 1994. Strategic Budgeting. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Schick, Allen , 1980. Congress and Money. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.
Schick, Allen , 1990. The Capacity to Budget. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute,
Schick, Allen , 1995. The Federal Budget: Politics, Policy, Process. Washington, D.C.: The
Brookings Institution.
Stith, Kate , 1988. "Rewriting the Fiscal Constitution: The Case of Gramm-Rudman-Hollings."
California Law Review, vol. 76, no. 3 (May).
Wildavsky, Aaron , 1988. The New Politics of the Budgetary Process. Glenview, II: Scott
Foresman.

Target-Based Budgeting
Buck, A. E. , 1929. Public Budgeting. New York: Harper.
Lewis, V. , 1988. "Reflections on Budget Systems." Public Budgeting and Finance, vol. 8, no. 1:
4–19.
Rocca, H. , 1935. Council-Manager Government in Berkeley, California. Berkeley, CA: James J.
Gillick.
Rubin, I. S. , 1991. "Budgeting for Our Times: Target-Based Budgeting." Public Budgeting and
Finance, vol. 11, no. 3: 5–14.
Wenz, T. , and A. Nolan , 1982. "Budgeting for the Future: Target Base Budgeting." Public
Budgeting and Finance, vol. 2, no. 2: 88–91.

Audit
Brown, Richard E. , Thomas P. Gallagher , and Meredith C. Williams , eds. 1982. Auditing
Performance in Government: Concepts and Cases. New York: Wiley.
Friedberg, Asher , Benjamin Geist , Nissim Mizrahi , and Ira Sharkansky , eds., 1991. State
Audit and Accountability: A Book of Readings. Jerusalem: Israeli State Comptroller.
Mosher, Frederick C. , 1979. The GAO: The Quest for Accountability in American Government.
Boulder: Westview Press.
Normanton, E. Leslie , 1966. The Accountability and Audit of Governments: A Comparative
Study. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
Sinclair, Sonja , 1979. Cordial but Not Cosy: A History of the Office of the Auditor General.
Toronto: Maclelland and Stewart.

Accountability
Benedict, Ruth , 1946. The Chrysanthemum and the Sword: Patterns of Japanese Culture.
Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Burke, John P. , 1986. Bureaucratic Responsibility. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University
Press.
Dubnick, Melvin , and Barbara S. Romzek , 1993. "Accountability and the Centrality of
Expectations." In James Perry , ed., Research in Public Administration. Greenwich, CT: JAI
Press, pp. 37–78.
Finer, Herman , 1941. "Administrative Responsibility and Democratic Government." Public
Administration Review, vol. 1:335–350.
Friedrich, Carl J. , 1940. "Public Policy and the Nature of Administrative Responsibility." In C. J.
Friedrich and E. S. Mason , eds., Public Policy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Romzek, Barbara S. , and Melvin J. Dubnick , 1987. "Accountability in the Public Service:
Lessons from the Challenger Tragedy." Public Administration Review, vol. 47, no. 3: 227–239.
Romzek, Barbara S. , and Melvin J. Dubnick , 1994. "Issues of Accountability in Flexible
Personnel Systems." In Patricia W. Ingraham and Barbara S. Romzek , eds., New Paradigms
for Government: Issues for the Changing Public Service. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Thompson, Dennis F. , 1987. Political Ethics and Public Office, Cambridge: Harvard University
Press.
Stewardship
Bowman, James S. , 1991. Ethical Frontiers in Public Management. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
Burke, John P. , 1986. Bureaucratic Responsibility. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University
Press.
Cooper, Terry , 1994. Handbook of Public Administrative Ethics. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Cooper, Terry , 1991. An Ethic of Citizenship for Public Administration. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
Davis, Kenneth Culp ., 1971. Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry. Urbana: University of
Illinois Press.
Deming, W. Edwards , 1986. Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fox, Charles , and Hugh T. Miller , 1994. Postmodern Public Administration: Toward Discourse.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Goodsell, Charles T. , ed., 1981, The Public Encounter: Where State and Citizen Meet.
Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Kass, Henry D. , and Catron, Bayard , 1990. Images and Identities in Public Administration,
Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Likert, Rensis , 1961. New Patterns of Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lowi, Theodore , 1979. The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the U.S. 2d ed. New
York: W. W. Norton.
McGregor, Douglas M. , 1967. The Professional Manager. New York; McGraw-Hill.
Richards, Sue , 1992. "Changing Patterns of Legitimation in Public Management." Public Policy
and Administration, vol. 7 (Winter): 15–28.
Rohr, John A. , 1986. To Run a Constitution: The Legitimacy of the Administrative State.
Lawrence: University of Kansas.
Rohr, John A. 1987. Ethics for Bureaucrats: An Essay on Law and Values. Rev. New York:
Marcel Dekker.
Stever, James A. , 1988. The End of Public Administration: Problems of the Profession in the
Post-Progressive Era. New York: Transnational Publishers.
Terry, Larry 1995. The Administrator As Conservator: The Leadership of Public Bureaucracies.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Administrative Morality
Bailey, Stephen , 1964, "Ethics and the Public Service." Public Administration Review, vol. 24:
234–243.
Bowman, James , 1990. "Ethics in Government: A National Survey of Public Administrators."
Public Administration Review, vol. 50, no. 3: 345–353.
Bruce, Willa , 1994. "Controlling Corruption in Municipal Governments Around the Globe." In
Urie Berlinsky , A. Friedberg , B. Wemer , eds., Corruption in a Changing World: Comparisons,
Theories, and Controlling Strategies. Jerusalem: Israel Chen Press (Moshe).
Cooper, Terry , 1994. Handbook of Administrative Ethics. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Denhardt, K. , 1991. "Unearthing the Moral Foundations of Public Administration: Honor,
Benevolence, and Justice." In James S. Bowman , ed., Ethical Frontiers in Public Management.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dobel, J. Patrick , 1990. "Integrity in the Public Service." Public Administration Review
(May/June): 354–366.
Eaton, Dorman B. , 1880. Civil Service in Great Britain. New York: Harper Bros.
Finer, Herman , 1941. "Administrative Responsibility in Democratic Government," Public
Administration Review, vol. 1 (Autumn).
Frederickson, H. George , 1993. Ethics and Public Administration. Armonk, NY: M. E, Sharpe.
Friedrich, Carl , 1940. "Public Policy and the Nature of Administrative Responsibility." In E. S.
Mason and C. T. Friedrich , eds., Public Policy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gulick, Luther , and Lyndoll Urwick , eds., 1937. Papers on the Service of Public Administration.
New York: Institute of Public Administration.
Jos, Philip H. 1990. "Administrative Responsibility Revisited: Moral Consensus and Moral
Autonomy." Administration and Society, vol. 22, no. 2 (August): 228–248.
Lebacqz, Karen , 1986. Perspectives from Philosophical and Theological Ethics. Minneapolis:
Augsburg Publishing House.
Pugh, Darrell , 1991. "The Origins of Ethical Framework in Public Administration." In James S.
Bowman , ed., Ethical Frontiers in Public Management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 9–33.
Rohr, John , 1988. "Bureaucratic Morality in the United States." International Political Science
Review, vol. 9, no. 3:167–178.
Rohr, John , 1989. Ethics for Bureaucrats, 2d ed. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Thompson, Dennis F. , 1992. "Three Paradoxes in Government Ethics." The Public Manager
(Summer): 57–60.
Tinder, Glenn , 1991. Political Thinking: The Perennial Questions. 5th ed. New York:
HarperCollins.
Wall, Brent , 1991. "Assessing Ethics Theories from a Democratic Viewpoint." In James
Bowman , ed., Ethical Frontiers in Public Management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp.
135–157.
Wilson, Woodrow , 1887. "The Study of Administration." Political Science Quarterly, vol. 2
(June).

Standards of Conduct
American Society for Public Administration , 1994. "Code of Ethics." Washington, DC: American
Society for Public Administration.
" Code of Ethics for Government Service ," 1980. Public Law 96–303, Washington, DC: United
States Congress.
Cooper, Terry L. , 1990. The Responsible Administrator: An Approach to Ethics for the
Administrative Role. 3d ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
International City Management Association , 1987. "Code of Ethics with Guidelines."
Washington, DC: ICMA.
Mertins, Herman, Jr. , Frances Burke , Robert W. Kweit , and Gerald M. Pops , 1994. "Applying
Professional Standards and Ethics in the Nineties: A Workbook and Study Guide with Cases for
Public Administrators." Washington, DC: American Society for Public Administration.
Richter, William L. , Frances Burke , and Jameson W. Doig , eds., 1990. Combating
Corruption/Encouraging Ethics: A Sourcebook for Public Service Ethics. Washington, DC:
American Society for Public Administration.

Lying with Statistics


Hooke, Robert , 1983. How to Tell the Liars from the Statisticians. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Huff, Darrell , 1954. How to Lie with Statistics. New York: W. W. Norton.

Whistleblower
Dworkin, Terry Morehead , 1992. "Legal Approaches to Whistle-Blowing." In Marcia Miceli and
Janet Near , Blowing the Whistle. New York: Lexington Books, pp. 232–279.
Miceli, Marcia , and Janet Near , 1992. Blowing the Whistle: The Organizational and Legal
Implications for Companies and Employees. Hew York: Lexington Books.
Legal Cases:
Connick p. Meyers, 1983.461 U.S. 138.
Pickering v. Board of Education, 1968. 391 U.S. 563.
Rankin v. McPherson, 1987. 483 U.S. 378.
Waters v. Churchill, 1994. 62 Law Week 4397.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Concerns about public administration's political legitimacy relate to its identity crisis by highlighting the field’s struggle to define its role and authority within the broader political and social context. Questions around legitimacy address how public administration is perceived in terms of its influence, efficacy, and alignment with governance structures, influencing its quest for a distinct and recognized identity within the academic and professional domains .

Public administration's ambivalence towards bureaucracy and hierarchy results in internal discourse where scholars often criticize or avoid embracing characteristics that definitions typically associate with their field. Some scholars argue that these features are not inherent and should be mitigated for the field's improvement. This ambivalence prompts debates within the scholarly community about the essence of public administration and its core characteristics .

Public administration’s dual nature as an academic pursuit and professional field is seen as potentially limiting its disciplinary development. This concept suggests it may be more of an applied field akin to medicine, which integrates scientific and practitioner concerns. As such, it encompasses research, education, training, and practice, similar to other established applied fields, and its growth is likely intertwined with navigating both these academic and practical dimensions .

Some argue that public administration’s perceived eclecticism is typical of developing fields because it reflects the diversity seen in other social sciences. Even fields considered hard sciences exhibit a range of investigations and applications. The eclectic nature does not inherently limit the field; rather, it may be indicative of the normal complexity and nuances experienced during the evolution of any field’s disciplinary framework .

Concerns over professional status amplify the identity crisis in public administration. There is debate on whether public administration can be considered a profession, akin to law or medicine, which influences its identity status. Despite a developing consensus on establishing professional standards without strict adherence to traditional professional definitions, this ongoing dialogue contributes to the perception of an identity crisis .

Public administration is often critiqued for lacking a unifying theory, unlike some other fields. However, this assessment is considered by some as overstated, since many social sciences draw from a multidisciplinary knowledge base, similar to public administration. The field's eclecticism, linked to its practitioner aspects, can be complex, yet it parallels the diversity found in other social sciences. The absence of a clear dominant paradigm is common in the development of many fields .

The identity crisis in public administration is associated with several key concerns: (1) the questioning and clarification of the discipline's formation; (2) whether it is properly a profession; (3) unease about theoretical unification; (4) the dual nature of being both a professional and scholarly field; (5) ambivalence towards bureaucracy and hierarchy; and (6) concerns regarding political legitimacy . These issues reflect the ongoing dialogue and tension that has characterized the field, similar to other social sciences, where questions of identity and methodology remain prevalent .

Dialogue about theoretical unity plays a crucial role in evolving public administration by encouraging discourse on its multidisciplinary foundations and practitioner connections. This ongoing dialogue emphasizes the importance of integrating diverse theoretical approaches rather than seeking a singular unifying theory. Such discussions shape the field's development and guide its balance between academic rigor and practical applications .

The generic approach to administration, which posits that management is the same across different fields, influences educational institutions to sometimes structure themselves in ways that reflect this notion. For example, public administration departments may be organized within a larger school of business or management. This persists despite a shift away from strongly asserting such a generic approach, and is influenced by various non-epistemological, non-professional, and non-pedagogical reasons .

Comparing public administration to fields like medicine positions it as both a scientific and practitioner-oriented endeavor. This analogy suggests that, like medicine, public administration can leverage knowledge from various disciplines to enhance its scientific and applied nature. Such comparisons aid in conceptualizing public administration as a legitimate field that balances academic research with practical application, supporting its comprehensive approach akin to that seen in applied sciences .

You might also like