0% found this document useful (0 votes)
75 views17 pages

Comprehensive Fraud Risk Assessment Guide

This document provides guidance on conducting a fraud risk assessment. It begins by defining fraud risk and explaining that a fraud risk assessment is the cornerstone of an antifraud program. It then discusses the objectives and focus of a fraud risk assessment. The document outlines factors to consider in the assessment, including inherent, control, and residual risks. It provides details on assessing likelihood and significance of risks. Finally, it discusses assembling a fraud risk assessment team and techniques for conducting the assessment.

Uploaded by

jokitugasbro.id
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
75 views17 pages

Comprehensive Fraud Risk Assessment Guide

This document provides guidance on conducting a fraud risk assessment. It begins by defining fraud risk and explaining that a fraud risk assessment is the cornerstone of an antifraud program. It then discusses the objectives and focus of a fraud risk assessment. The document outlines factors to consider in the assessment, including inherent, control, and residual risks. It provides details on assessing likelihood and significance of risks. Finally, it discusses assembling a fraud risk assessment team and techniques for conducting the assessment.

Uploaded by

jokitugasbro.id
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

6/2/2023

FRAUD RISK
ASSESSMENT

Introduction
Fraud
Principles

Fraud Prevention,
Possibility of
Entity Activities Detection, &
Fraud
Investigation

Fraud Scheme
and Red Flags
Fraud Risk
Assessment
6/2/2023

What is Fraud Risk?


 Fraud risk = the vulnerability that an organization
faces from individuals capable of combining all
three elements of the fraud triangle
 Sources of FR: internal and external
 A fraud risk assessment  the cornerstone of an
antifraud program that anticipates, rather than
reacts to fraud and misconduct.
 No system of internal controls can fully
eliminate the risk of fraud

What is Fraud Risk?


 Inherent Risks = Risks that are present
before management action
 Control Risks = the likelihood that a
material misstatement (frauds) would not
be caught by the client’s internal
controls
 Residual Risks = The risks that remain
after management action
6/2/2023

What is a Fraud Risk Assessment?


 Process to:
 identify inherent fraud risk
 Industry, geo-political risks
 Company risks (Incentive plans, Growth rate,
Consolidation)
 Risk of management override
 assess the likelihood and significance of inherent
fraud risk
 Likelihood – remote, possible, probably
 Significance – not just dollars; reputation, management
time
 develop a response fraud risk

What is a Fraud Risk Assessment?


 Objectives:
 to identify and document risks and
controls for various scenarios & schemes
that can affect the company and its
shareholders
 To ensure compliance with corporate
governance requirements
 FRA focus on fraud schemes and
scenarios ----- fraud factors
6/2/2023

Fraud Factors
 Assessment should consider the fraud schemes
 For financial statement frauds: the executives of
the entity are the most likely would-be fraudster
a risk assessment would necessarily include those
individuals.
 For asset misappropriation: an employee in a
trusted position is likely to be the culprit.
 For corruption: include somebody outside the
entity working with someone inside—a unique
characteristic of corruption schemes.

RISK ASSESSMENT FACTORS


 General Factors:
 entity, people (behavioral), divisions, geographies,
products or services, accounting or business
processes, controls, or computerized systems.
 Why?
 All frauds are product of:
 the personality of the executive and employees,
 the working conditions,
 the effectiveness of internal controls,
 the level of honesty therein (the organizational
culture or environment)
6/2/2023

RAF: Internal Factors


 SOURCE of Risks:
 The absence of honest culture

 Failure to articulate and communicate minimum


standards of performance and personal conduct
 Inadequate orientation and training on legal,
ethical, fraud, and security issues
 Inadequate company policies (sanctions for
legal, ethical, and security breaches)

RAF: Internal Factors


 Failure to counsel and take administrative action
(performance level or personal behavior below
acceptable standards, or violates entity principles and
guidelines
 Ambiguity in job roles, duties, responsibilities, and
areas of accountability
 Lack of timely or periodic audits, inspections, and
follow-through to ensure compliance with entity goals,
priorities, policies, procedures, and governmental
regulations;
 Lack of accountability over key positions of trust
6/2/2023

Respond to Residual Fraud Risks


 Avoid the risk
 Eliminate asset or activity if controls are too expensive

 Transfer the risk


 Purchase fidelity insurance policy

 Mitigate the risk


 Implement countermeasures, such as prevention and
detection controls
 Assume the risk
 If probability of occurrence and impact of loss are low
 Combination approach

What Makes a Good Fraud Risk Assessment?


 Need formal approach not ad hoc approach.
 Collaborative Effort – share ownership
 The Right Sponsor
 Senior in organization  ideally an independent board or
audit committee member
 Independence/Objectivity
 Whether conducted by internal or external resources
 Be mindful of personal biases

 Access to People at All Levels


 The Ability to Think the Unthinkable
 Think like a fraudster
6/2/2023

Assembling Fraud Risk Assessment Team

 Consist of individuals with diverse


knowledge, skills, and perspectives
 Includes members from internal and
external resources:
 Accounting and finance personnel
 Management teams
 Legal department
 Compliance department
 Internal auditors
 External consultants

Determine the Best Techniques of the Fraud


Risk Assessment
 Interviews
 Focus groups
 Surveys
 Anonymous feedback mechanisms
6/2/2023

RISK MANAGEMENT CHECKLISTS AND


DOCUMENTATION
 RM Checklist is designed to assist accountants in assessing
and managing the risk of fraud in their organizations and
those of their clients

Fraud Schemes Checklist


 Use an appropriate taxonomy of fraud
schemes
 the ACFE fraud tree could be used to
determine at least the initial list of fraud
schemes:
 Fraudulent Financial Statement
 Asset Misappropriation
 Corruption
6/2/2023

Fraud Schemes Checklist


 The columns of risk assessment form include
 The fraud scheme
 An assessment of inherent risk
 The availability of internal controls in mitigating that
risk
 The ‘‘residual risk’’ left over after the mitigation of
existing internal controls
 Business processes, where the scheme is likely to
occur, if it does occur
 Red flags, which could be used to detect this scheme
6/2/2023

Inherent Risk
 Risks that are present before management
action
 Factors affecting inherent risk:
 Dollar size of the account
 Liquidity
 Volume of transactions
 Complexity of the transactions
 New accounting pronouncements
 Subjective estimates

4-19

Control Risk
 Control Risk (CR) is the likelihood that a
material misstatement (fraud) would not be
caught by the client’s internal controls.
 Factors affecting control risk include:
 The environment in which the company
operates (its “control environment”).
 The existence (or lack thereof) and
effectiveness of control activities.
 Monitoring activities (audit committee,
internal audit function, etc.).
4-20
6/2/2023

Measures and Relationships


 Residual Risk
 The risks that remain after management action
 Residual Risk = the inherent risk minus the level of
control mitigation
 Responses:
 no action, as the remaining risk is accepted
 action to mitigate or
 remediate through additional prevention or detection
procedures

Measures and Relationships

 Business Processes
 to identify which business processes (i.e., cash
receipts, payroll, etc.) are involved with this scheme

 Red Flags
 identify the red flags that could be associated
with the scheme
6/2/2023

Measures and Relationships


 What is a relevant, reliable, and representative
indication of the risk needing measurement?
 Inherent Risk
 could be a probability (1 to 100 percent)
 simply low, medium, or high risk

 Controls Assessment
 what controls are in place to mitigate the specific
fraud scheme

Example of measure
 Assess Likelihood of Fraud
1. Remote (<5% chance of occurrence)
2. Possible (5-50% chance of occurrence)
3. Somewhat likely (51-75% chance of occurrence)
4. Probable (>75% chance of occurrence)
 Assess Significance of Risk
1. Negligible
2. Serious
3. Significant
4. Material
6/2/2023

Likelihood: more details


Likelihood
Based on Annual Probability of
Based on Annual Frequency
Rating Occurrence
Descriptor Definition Descriptor Definition
More than twenty >90% chance of
5 Very frequent Almost certain
times per year occurrence

Six to twenty times 65% to 90% chance


4 Frequent Likely
per year of occurrence

Reasonably Two to five times 35% to 65% chance


3 Reasonably possible
frequent per year of occurrence

10% to 35% chance


2 Occasional Once per year Unlikely
of occurrence

Less than once per < 10% chance of


1 Rare Remote
year occurrence

Significance: more details


Rating Descriptor Definition
5 Catastrophic  Financial loss to company in excess of $10 million
 International, long-term media coverage
 Widespread employee morale issues and loss of multiple
senior leaders
 Required to report incident to authorities, resulting in
significant sanctions and financial penalties
4 Major  Financial loss to company between $100,000 and $10 million
 National, long-term media coverage
 Widespread employee morale problems and turnover
 Required to report incident to authorities, resulting in
sanctions against company
3 Moderate  Financial loss to company between $10,000 and $100,000
 Short-term, regional or national media coverage
 Widespread employee morale problems
 Required to report incident to authorities and take immediate
corrective action
2 Minor  Financial loss to company between $1,000 and $10,000
 Limited, local media coverage
 General employee morale problems
 Incident is reportable to authorities, but no follow-up
 Financial loss to company less than $1,000
1 Incidental  No media coverage
 Isolated employee dissatisfaction
 Event does not need to be reported to authorities
6/2/2023

Rating IC Efffectiveness

Risk Matrix
Significance (Impact)
Likelihood
1 2 3 4 5
(Incidental) (Minor) (Moderate) (Major) (Catastropic)

Almost certain (5) X (5) X(20)

Likely (4) X (20)


(ie. markup Procurement)
Reasonably possible (3) X 6

Unlikely (2)

Remote(1) x (3)

= Need more action


6/2/2023

FRAUD RISK ASSESSMENT FORM

FRAUD RISK ASSESSMENT FORM


6/2/2023

FRAUD RISK ASSESSMENT FORM


6/2/2023

CLOSING NOTES:
KEY TAKE AWAY KNOWLEDGE
 Fraud Risk Assessment is important part of Fraud
detection, prevention and investigation
 Fraud Risk Assessment requires understanding
 Taxonomy of fraud schemes, and
 Red Flags

 Fraud Risk Assessment is continuous process :


 should be conducted regularly
 Using Formal approach
 Involving a Integrated Team

 Fraud Risk can be assessed using Risk Management


checklist or Fraud Scheme Checklist

You might also like