0% found this document useful (0 votes)
49 views21 pages

Judicial Control

Judicial control over administration is based on the concept of rule of law and includes reviewing abuse of power, lack of jurisdiction, errors of fact or law, and procedural errors through methods such as judicial review and statutory appeals. The key writs used by courts to control administration are habeas corpus, mandamus, quo warranto, prohibition, and certiorari. Suits can be brought against the government for contracts and torts involving non-sovereign functions, and against public officials with prior notice, but the President and Governors have personal immunity.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
49 views21 pages

Judicial Control

Judicial control over administration is based on the concept of rule of law and includes reviewing abuse of power, lack of jurisdiction, errors of fact or law, and procedural errors through methods such as judicial review and statutory appeals. The key writs used by courts to control administration are habeas corpus, mandamus, quo warranto, prohibition, and certiorari. Suits can be brought against the government for contracts and torts involving non-sovereign functions, and against public officials with prior notice, but the President and Governors have personal immunity.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Judicial Control Over Administration

 It has its base in the concept of ‘’Rule of the


Law’’
Scope of Judicial Control
1. Abuse of Power- Malfeasance
2. Lack of Jurisdiction-Overfeasance
3. Error in fact finding
4. Error of Law- Misfeasance
5. Procedural Error
Methods of Judicial Control
1. Judicial Review
judicial activism
• According to Black's Law Dictionary
• judicial activism is a " judicial philosophy
which motivate judges to depart from the
traditional precedents in favour of
progressive and new social policies”
2. Statutory Appeals
• A right to challenge administrative decision-
making or action provided for specifically
by statute and, most commonly, described as
an appeal and found in the very statute which is
the source of decision or action.
Q. Judicial Activism is the expansion of power
and scope of-
a) Legislature
b) Executive
c) Judiciary
d) All of these
Writs
Type of Writ Meaning of the Word Purpose of the Issue

Habeas Corpus You may have the To release a person who has been detained
body unlawfully

Mandamus We Command Command issued by the court to Public


Authorities asking him to perform his official
duty which he failed to perform

Quo Warranto By what authority or Issued by the Court to inquire into the
warrant legality of claim of a person to a public
office.

Prohibition To Forbid Issued by the higher court to lower courts


when the latter exceeds its jurisdiction. It is
preventive.
Certiorari To be Certified To quash the order of the lower judiciary /
tribunal /quasi Judicial Body. It is preventive
and well as curative.
Habeas Corpus
To have a body
 Objective: To set free a person illegally
detained
Petition by friend/Relative also.
Writ addressed to:
– Government
– An Official
– Private Person
For disobedience : Contempt of Court
Mandamus
 Mandamus = A Command
 Order to do something: demands some activity
 Command to perform Public or Quasi-public duty
 Writ available against:
– Government
– Public Servant
– Judicial Body
• Writ not available against
– President of India
– Governor
– Private Individual
Quo Warrento
Quo Warranto = What is your authority?
Court inquires into legality of claim to Public
Office
Object: To prevent illegitimate of Public Office
When?
– Disqualified for the post
– Procedure not followed
– Irregular appointment
Prohibition
 Prohibition- ‘ to forbid’
Order to stay a judicial Proceeding
A writ of prohibition is issued to prevent an
inferior court or tribunal from exceeding its
jurisdiction.
 Issued only against Judicial or quasi judicial
authorities
Certiorari
Certiorari- ‘To be Certified’
A writ of certiorari is issued by the supreme
court or high court to nullify an order made
without jurisdiction or in violation of the rules
of natural justice by an inferior court.
Issued only against Judicial or quasi judicial
authorities
Unlike the Prohibition which is only
preventive, the certiorari is preventive as well
as curative.
Q. Which of the following writs is said to be a
guarantor of personal freedom?
(a) Mandamus
(b) Habeas Corpus
(c) Quo Warranto
(d) Certiorari
Suits Against Government
Art. 300 of the Indian Constitution governs the
suability of the government.

The Center and state governments can be sued


according to the law made by the parliament
and the state legislature respectively.

 In contracts the governments can be sued like


an individual citizen.
• In tort (A wrongful act that causes a claimant
to suffer loss or harm, resulting in legal
liability for the person who commits the
tortious act) there is a distinction between
sovereign and non sovereign functions of the
state.
• In state can be sued in the court only in the
case of non sovereign functions not for the
sovereign functions.
Suit Against the Public Officials
President and the state governors enjoy personal
immunity from their official acts.

During their term of office, they are immune


from any criminal proceeding

By giving two months notice, civil proceedings


can be initiated against them.

Civil Servants are given personal immunity from


legal liability for official contracts.
• By giving two months notice, civil proceedings
can be initiated against them for anything done
in their official capacity.
• In criminal liabilities, proceedings can be
instituted against them for acts done in their
official capacity with prior permission from the
government.
• Sovereign Functions:

Sovereign functions are those actions of the state for


which it is not answerable in any court of law. For
instance, acts such as defense of the country, raising and
maintaining armed forces, making peace or war, foreign
affairs, acquiring and retaining territory, are functions
which are indicative of external sovereignty and are
political in nature. Therefore, they are not amenable to
jurisdiction of ordinary civil court. The State is immune
from being sued, as the jurisdiction of the courts in such
matters is impliedly barred.

You might also like