PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING REPORT OF PSYCHOLOGY

Submitted By

Rimsha Iqbal

2020-GCUF-059131

Submitted To

Ms Mehjabeen Abid

BACHELOR OF SCIENCE

IN

PSYCHOLOGY

DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY AFRO ASIAN INTITUTE

Dedication
First of all, we thanks to Allah Almighty to give us courage. We would like to dedicate this to our beloved

parents. Our gratitude goes to our supervisor for her assistance in preparing this document, as well as our

colleagues in the Department of Psychology and the faculty of the Afro Asian Institute.

CERTIFICATE

I certify that the contents and form of health report submitted by

Mr/Miss/Mrs………………………………, Registration No.…………..has been found satisfactory and in

accordance with the prescribed format. I recommend it to be processed for the evaluation by the External

Examiner for the award of grade.

 _________________ ----------------------------

Date signature of Supervisor

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

It is my proud privilege to express my profound sense of gratitude and sincere indebtedness to my

supervisor Mam Mehjabeen Abid, who provide me the guidance on the various aspects of my

Psychological Testing case reports and with the help of her good self. I am able to complete these case

reports

My heart is filled with deep sense of thankfulness and obedience to my teachers for their valuable

suggestions and lively moral boosting during the progress of my health psychology case reports. I am

highly grateful to my parents and brothers for their affectionate, financial and moral support. They have

always been source of inspiration for me.

Last but not least I extended my sincere thanks to my friends and all of those who helped me in one or the

other way, during my clinical case reports.

Table of Contents
 Sr.
Contents Page No.
No.

Report no 1

Beck anxiety inventory

Introduction

Psychometric property 7-17

1
Purpose

Conclusion

References

Appendices –A

Report no 2

Beck depression inventory-II

Introduction

Psychometric property 18-26

2
Purpose

Conclusion

References

Appendices –B
 Report no 3

Beck hopelessness scale

Introduction

Psychometric property 27-36

3
Purpose

Conclusion

References

Appendices C

Report no 4

Rotter incomplete sentence blank

Introduction

Psychometric property
4 37-47
Purpose

Conclusion

References

Appendices D
Beck Anxiety Inventory

Beck Anxiety Inventory

Author:
 [Link]

Purpose:

To assess the severity of depression in adults and adolescents

Age Range:

17 year and older

Administration:

Individual

Administration Time:

5 to 10 mints

Bio data of subject:

Name: Mr Y

Age: 25

Gender: Male

Education: F.A

Occupation Nothing

Religion: Islam

Marital Status: unmarried

Time taken: 10 min

INTRODUCTION:

The BAI was first introduced in 1988. . The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) is a widely used self-report

questionnaire designed to measure the severity of anxiety in [Link] BAI is a self-report anxiety

inventory consisting of 21 questions. The BAI assesses frequency of anxiety symptoms over a 1 week

period while minimizing their relationship with depression. Fourteen items ask about somatic symptoms

and 7 ask about cognitive symptoms associated with [Link] has been used in multiple studies, including

in treatment-outcome studies for individuals who have experienced traumas. Although the age range for

the measure is from 17 to [Link] Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) can vary depending on the individual's

reading speed, comprehension, and the degree of thought they put into their responses. On average, it

typically takes about 5 to 10 minutes for an individual to complete the [Link] BAI common tool for

studying anxiety disorders, measuring anxiety levels, and exploring relationships with other variables.

Scoring, Administration and Interpretation:

Administer:

The 25 year old male patient was given the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BDI) in a private, secure setting

while being closely monitored. The patient's comfort and compliance were ensured throughout the process

by the meticulous execution of the assessment. He was provided with a clear explanation of the

assessment's purpose and procedures, emphasizing the confidentiality of his responses. He exhibited a

positive test-taking attitude, engaging earnestly with the questionnaire, and offering thoughtful responses

to each item. The psychologist created an environment by acting in a nonjudgmental and encouraging

manner. This careful administration process aimed to obtain accurate and reliable data, laying the

foundation for thorough [Link] order to make it easier to produce treatment recommendations

that are suitable.

Scoring:

The BAI consists of twenty-one questions about how the subject has been feeling in the last month,

expressed as common symptoms of anxiety (such as numbness and tingling, sweating not due to heat, and

fear of the worst happening). It is designed for an age range of 17–80 years old. Each question has the

same set of four possible answer choices, which are arranged in columns and are answered by marking the

appropriate one with a [Link] are:

 NOT AT ALL (0 points)
MILDLY: It did not bother me much. (1 point)
MODERATELY: It was very unpleasant, but I could stand it. (2 points)
SEVERELY: I could barely stand it. (3 points)

The total score on the Beck Anxiety Inventory can range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating a

greater level of anxiety. Here is a general interpretation of the total scores:

0-7: Minimal anxiety

8-15: Mild anxiety
16-25: Moderate anxiety
26-63: Severe anxiety

The BAI takes from 5-10 minutes to complete when self-administered, and 15 minutes to complete when

interviewer-administered . The questions are posed around a two-week period including today, as opposed

to around the past week as in the original BAI. Thus, in the early post-stroke period, the BAI may be an

inappropriate tool as the responses given in the early period are unlikely to provide a valid estimate of

anxiety

. It's important to note that the BAI is a self-report measure, meaning it relies on the individual's own

assessment of their symptoms. It is not a diagnostic tool, and a clinical diagnosis should be made by a

qualified healthcare professional based on a comprehensive assessment that may include the BAI and

other clinical interviews.

Interpretation:

It is important to note that the BAI is not intended to provide a clinical diagnosis of anxiety disorders, but

rather to assess the severity of anxiety symptoms. As such, it is often used in conjunction with other

measures and assessments to help guide diagnosis and treatment planning.

Questionnaire:
The 21 questions that make up the BAI questionnaire are used to gauge anxiety symptoms. Since it's a

self-report measure, your responses to the questions are derived from your personal experiences. The

questions cover a range of symptoms, such as tenseness, nervousness, and restlessness. You select the

number that most accurately indicates how much you have experienced each symptom over the past week

on a scale of 0 to 3. To determine your level of anxiety, add up all of your points and find out how you

scored overall. Although this questionnaire cannot be used as a diagnostic tool, it can offer valuable

information that you and your healthcare provider can discuss.

Items:

A self-report questionnaire called the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) is used to gauge how severe anxiety

symptoms are. It has 21 items that measure various anxiety symptoms. Mental health practitioners

frequently use it to assess and track anxiety levels.

Psychometric Properties:

The psychometric properties of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) refer to its reliability and validity as a

measurement tool. These properties are crucial for determining the instrument's consistency, accuracy, and

effectiveness in assessing anxiety symptoms. Here are key aspects of the psychometric properties of the

BAI:

Reliability:

This assesses the stability of the BAI scores over time when administered to the same individuals on two

different occasions. A high test-retest reliability coefficient indicates that the instrument produces

consistent results over [Link] correlation for the reliability of the BAI yielded a coefficient of 0.92 the

BAI had high internal consistency .High internal consistency indicates that the items are measuring the

same underlying construct. Cronbach's alpha is a common statistic used to measure internal consistency.

Validity:
The degree to which the BAI accurately measures what it is supposed to measure is referred to as validity.

It has been discovered that the BAI exhibits strong correlations with other measures of anxiety and related

constructs, but little correlation with measures of unrelated constructs, indicating good convergent and

discriminant validity. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that the BAI has good diagnostic accuracy,

with sensitivity and specificity that are on par with other commonly used anxiety measures.

Purpose:

The purpose of Beck Anxiety Inventory is to measure the level of anxiety of an individual.

Background information

Mr Y is 25-year-old male undergoing the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BDI) assessment, reveals a complex

personal, educational, and family history. He is a inter-mediate educated individual, and after inter he did

not continue his study due to some family problem and some financial problem. He is not socially active.

He has one sister and one brother. His sister is matric pass student and his brother is working in a factory

. His father is died in 2017 .He is not socially attached with society like other. This comprehensive

background context aids in understanding the multifaceted factors that contribute to Mr Y current

psychological state.

Behavior observation:

The client seemed to be well-groomed and in good hygienic shape. He was at ease and at ease in this serene

setting. He had carefully followed all instructions and focused entirely on the test. He was not physically

impaired. He could clearly be heard speaking

Interpretation:

Quantitative analysis:

The following data shows the quantitative analysis of recorded data from the client’s responses.

Total Score Cut off score

29 26-63
Qualitative Analysis:

The clients score is 29 which falls within the range of 26-63. These results indicate that the client has

“severe level of anxiety.

Conclusion:

The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) results suggest that Mr Y is experiencing severe anxiety symptoms.

These symptoms are interfering with his daily life and overall quality of life. Given the severity of his

anxiety, it is recommended that Mr Y be referred for a comprehensive mental health assessment and

appropriate treatment, which may include psychotherapy, medication, or a combination of both. His

emotional well-being and safety should be closely monitored, and he should receive the necessary support

and care to address his Anxiety .

Reference

Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety:

Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(6), 893-897.

 Appendix_A

BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY

 Back Depression Inventory

Author:

Aaron. T. Beck

Purpose:

To assess the severity of depression in adults and adolescents

Age Range;

13 years and older

Administration:

Individual

Administration Time:

5 to 10 mints

Bio data of subject

Name: Mr U

Age: 26

Gender: Male

Occupation: Employee

Education: Intermediate

Religion: Islam

Marital Status: Unmarried

Time taken: 10 min

INTRODUCTION:

The BDI was first introduced in 1961, and it has been revised several times since (Beck et al., 1988).The

Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a self-report instrument designed to assess the presence and severity

of depressive symptoms in individuals aged 13 and older. Developed by Dr. Aaron T. Beck, a pioneer in

cognitive therapy, the BDI has become one of the most widely used tools for measuring the depth of

depression in both clinical and research settings. Its primary purpose is to provide a standardized and

quantifiable way for individuals to communicate and quantify their experiences of depression.

The BDI was developed in a manner similar to the MMPI: clinical observations of symptoms and

attitudes among depressed patients were contrasted to those among non depressed patients in order to

obtain differentiation of the depressed group from the rest of the psychiatric patients. The 21 symptoms

and attitudes contained in the BDI reflect the intensity of the depression; items receive a rating of zero to

three to reflect their intensity and are summed linearly to create a score which ranges from 0 to 63. The 21

items included reflect a variety of symptoms and attitudes commonly found among clinically depressed

individuals (e.g., Mood, Self-dislike, Social Withdrawal, Sleep Disturbance). The BDI administration is

straightforward, and it can be given as an interview by the clinician or as a self-report instrument

(requiring a fifth or sixth grade reading level).

Questionnaire:
The questionnaire was created based on clinical observations of attitudes and symptoms that commonly

appeared in patients with depression and infrequently appeared in people without depression [5]. From

those observations, twenty-one items were combined and assigned a severity ranking of 0–3. Although

trained interviewers were intended to give the questionnaire initially, it is now frequently self-administered

[3]. Self-care requires five to ten minutes.

Items:

21 items total on a 4-point BDI-II scale, ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). In

accordance with the DSM-IV criteria for major depression, affective, cognitive, somatic, and vegetative

symptoms are covered but anxiety symptoms are not evaluated. The top ratings for each of the 21

elements are added to determine the score. A score of zero is the least and 63 is the maximum. Greater

severity of symptoms is indicated by higher ratings. Scores greater than 20 in non-clinical groups are

indicative of depression [6]. Scores 0–13 denote minor depression, 14–19 mild depression, 20–28 moderate

depression, and 29–63 severe depression in individuals with a diagnosis of depression [4].

Psychometric Properties:

The Beck despair stock-II (BDI-II) is a broadly used self-file questionnaire designed to degree the severity

of depression in individuals. Permits speak its psychometric houses, together with reliability and validity,

in element:

Reliability:

The term "reliability" refers to the test's results' consistency and stability across time and in many

[Link] Spear man-Brown correlation for the reliability of the BDI yielded a coefficient of.93, while

the internal consistency analysis reported in Beck's original publication revealed a correlation coefficient

of.86 for the test items. It yielded split-half reliability of 0.86 and alpha coefficient

Validity:

Validity relates back to how much each item on the BDI-II represents the entire range of symptoms

connected to depression. The three individuals who developed the BDI-II were Aaron T. Beck, Robert A.

Steer, and Gregory OK. Brown. All three have extensive backgrounds in psychology and depression
research. In order to make the questionnaire comprehensive in evaluating melancholy, they tried to include

items that address cognitive, affective, and somatic symptoms of the condition.

PURPOSE:

The purpose of Beck Depression Inventory is to measure the level of Depression of an individual.

Background information:

Mr U is 26-year-old male undergoing the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) assessment, reveals a

complex personal, educational, and family history. He is a inter-mediate educated individual, having

completed his higher education. In his personal life, Mr U has been experiencing persistent symptoms of

depression, for several months,including enduring sadness, loss of interest in activities, sleep and appetite

disturbances, and feelings of hopelessness. His family history is notable for a lack of reported psychiatric

hospitalizations or formal mental health treatment, suggesting that this may be his first formal encounter

with mental health care. This comprehensive background context aids in understanding the multifaceted

factors that contribute to Mr U current psychological state.

Behavior observation:

The client seemed to be well-groomed and in good hygienic shape. He was at ease and at ease in this serene

setting. He had carefully followed all instructions and focused entirely on the test. He was not physically

impaired. He could clearly be heard speaking.

Interpretation:

Quantitative analysis:

The following data shows the quantitative analysis of recorded data from the client’s responses.

Total Score Cut off score

31 30-63
Qualitative Analysis:

The clients score is 31 which falls within the range of 30-63. These results indicate that the client has

“sphere level of depression.

Conclusion:

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) results suggest that Mr U is experiencing severe depressive

symptoms. These symptoms are interfering with her daily life and overall quality of life. Given the severity

of his depression, it is recommended that Mr U be referred for a comprehensive mental health assessment

and appropriate treatment, which may include psychotherapy, medication, or a combination of both. His

emotional well-being and safety should be closely monitored, and he should receive the necessary support

and care to address his depressive disorder.

Reference

Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., &

Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4(6), 561-571.
 Appendix_B

BECK HOLESNESS INVENTORY

 BECK HOPLESSNESS INVENTORY

Author:

Aaron T. Beck

Purpose

Measure suicidal tendency

Age range

17 to 80

Administration

Individual

Administration time

5 to 10 mints

Bio data of subject

Name: Mr T

Age: 24

Gender: Male
Occupation: Clerk

Education: Intermediate

Religion: Islam

Marital Status: unmarried

Time taken: 10 min

INTRODUCTION

The Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) is a self-report questionnaire developed by Dr. Aaron T. Beck in 1974

to measure negative attitudes toward the future. It consists of 20 true/false items that assess three major

aspects of hopelessness: feelings about the future, loss of motivation, and expectations Individuals rate

each item based on their agreement, and scores are summed to indicate the level of hopelessness .It

provides valuable insights into an individual's cognitive outlook, particularly focusing on the presence of

[Link] the years, research has delved into the internal structure and psychometric properties of

the BHS, enhancing its effectiveness in comprehensive mental health assessments-The Beck Hopelessness

Scale is a valuable tool in psychology, offering a structured approach to assess and understand an

individual's thoughts and feelings regarding the future and hopelessness.

Scoring, Administration and Interpretation:

Administer:

The administration of the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) to a 24-year-old boy involves first obtaining

informed consent and explaining the purpose of the [Link] examiner should give the participant the

BHS and ask them to read each item carefully and indicate whether they believe the statement is true or

false for them and collect the BHS from the participant and score it. Gather information about the

individual's family history, focusing on any instances of mental health issues, substance abuse, or suicide

attempts.

Scoring and Interpretation:

The BHS is scored by counting the number of items that the participant answered “true” to. The total

score, obtained by summing the scores for all 20 items, ranges from 0 to 40. A higher total score implies a

greater degree of hopelessness. Interpretation of the total score is generally categorized as follows:

0-3: Minimal hopelessness

4-8: Mild hopelessness

9-14: Moderate hopelessness

15-20: Severe hopelessness

Questionnaire:

Each optimistic response is scored as 0 and each pessimistic response is scored as 1. A total score is

calculated by summing the pessimistic responses for each of the 20 items. The Beck Hopelessness Scale

(BHS) is a proprietary instrument.

Items:

The BHS consists of 20 items that are rated on a true/false scale. The items assess three aspects of

hopelessness:

Feelings about the future: Items such as “I might as well give up because there’s nothing I can do to make

things better for me” and “I don’t see much hope for my future.”

Loss of motivation: Items such as “I don’t feel like I have what it takes to succeed” and “I don’t see the

point in trying anymore.”

Expectations: Items such as “I don’t think anything good is going to happen to me” and “I don’t think I’ll

ever get better.”

To score the BHS, simply count the number of items that you answered “true” to. Your score will range

from 0 to 20, with a higher score indicating greater hopelessness. A score of 0-3 is considered normal, 4-8

is mild hopelessness, 9-14 is moderate hopelessness, and 15-20 is severe hopelessness.

Psychometric Properties:
The psychometric properties of the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) provide insights into its reliability and

validity as a psychological assessment [Link] properties ensures

that the BHS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing hopelessness, contributing to its widespread use in

clinical and research settings.

Reliability:

Reliability refers to the consistency of a measure. In one study, the BHS had a test-retest reliability
coefficient of 0.81. This means that the scores of participants on the BHS were highly correlated (r = 0.81)

when they took the test twice, one week apart.

In one study, the BHS had an internal consistency coefficient of 0.89.

Validity:

Validity refers to the accuracy of a measure. In one study, the BHS was able to correctly identify 85% of

patients who were at risk for suicide.

Purpose:

The purpose of Beck hopelessness Inventory is to measure the level of hopelessness of an individual.

Background information

Mr T is 24-year-old male undergoing the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) assessment reveals a complex

personal, educational, and assessment family history.,His qualifications was intermediate. His father is

security guard at bank His mother is a house wife He is the eldest child of a family and has 1 brother and

1 sister. He is a matric passed individual, In his personal life, Mr T has been experiencing persistent

symptoms of hopelessness for several months,including enduring sadness , sleep and appetite disturbances,

and feelings of hopelessness. The purpose of this evaluation is to measure his level of hopelessness and

gain insights into his subjective well-being This comprehensive background context aids in understanding

the Mr T current psychological state.

Behavior observation:

Mr T exhibited a cooperative and engaged test-taking attitude during the administration of the Beck

Hopelessness scale (BHS) .Apparently, the client’s hygienic condition was good and he was well-dressed.

The environment was calm and he was comfortable and relaxed. He had listened all instructions carefully

and had paid full attention to the [Link] to Mr T collaboration and active engagement, it was simpler to

collect pertinent data,

Interpretation:

Quantitative analysis:

The following data shows the quantitative analysis of recorded data from the client’s responses.

Total Score Cut off score

10 9-14

Qualitative Analysis:

The clients score is 10 which falls within the range of 9-14. These results indicate that the client has “

Moderate hopelessness.”

Conclusions:

The Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) results suggest that Mr T is experiencing moderate level of

hopelessness. The BHS, designed to gauge feelings of hopelessness, may highlight symptoms such as

persistent negative attitudes about the future. These symptoms are interfering with his daily life and

overall quality of life.

 References

Beck, A. T., Weissman, A., Lester, D., & Trexler, L. (1974). The measurement of pessimism: The

Hopelessness Scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(6), 861-865.

 Appendix_C

Rotter Incomplete Sentence Blank

Rotter Incomplete Sentence Blank

Author:

[Link]

Purpose:

Measure to find desires, wishes, and fear

Age Range:

17 years above

Administration:

Individual and Group

 Administration Time:

25 to 30 mints

Bio data of subject

Name: H

Age: 2

Gender: Male

Occupation: Shopkeeper

Education: Intermediate

Religion: Islam

Marital Status: unmarried

Time taken: 10 min

INTRODUCTION:

The Rotter Incomplete Sentences Blank is a projective psychological test developed by Julian Rotter and

Janet E. Rafferty in 1950. It comes in three forms i.e. school form, college form, adult form for different

age groups, and comprises 40 incomplete sentences which the S's has to complete as soon as possible but

the usual time taken is around 20 minutes, the responses are usually only 1–2 words long such as "I regret

..." and "Mostly girls...".the test can be administered both individually and in a group setting. It doesn't

have long set of instructions and can be easily worked out on a greater population.
The RISB is divided into three main sections:

The Ideation Scale measures the subject’s cognitive style and thought processes.

The Affect Scale measures the subject’s emotional state and level of adjustment.

The Social Relationships Scale measures the subject’s interpersonal style and social functioning.

The RISB is a valuable tool for understanding an individual’s personality and socioemotional functioning.

It is a reliable and valid test that can be used in research and clinical settings.

Scoring, Administration and Interpretations:

Administration:

The Rotter Incomplete Sentences Blank (RISB) is a projective personality test that can be administered

individually or in a group setting. The test is typically administered by a trained clinician or psychologist.

Scoring and Interpretation:

The RISB consists of 40 incomplete sentences, each of which is one or two words long. The subject is

asked to complete each sentence in any way they choose. There are no right or wrong answers, and the

subject is encouraged to be as honest and spontaneous as [Link] RISB is typically administered in a

quiet setting where the subject will not be interrupted. The clinician will read the incomplete sentences

aloud, and the subject will write their responses in the blank spaces provided. The test should take

approximately 20 minutes to complete.

After the test is complete, the clinician will score the responses using a standardized scoring system. The

scores are then used to generate a personality profile that can be used to understand the individual’s

strengths and weaknesses, coping mechanisms, and areas of potential growth.

Questionnaire:

The RISB consists of 40 incomplete sentences, each of which is one or two words long. The subject is

asked to complete each sentence in any way they choose. There are no right or wrong answers, and the

subject is encouraged to be as honest and spontaneous as possible.

Items scoring

Overall scores generally range from 80 to 205 (on a scale from zero through 240). However, because of the

diversity among individuals' idiosyncratic responses, the RISB cannot readily be computer scored.

Psychometric Properties:

The Rotter Incomplete Sentences Blank (RISB) is a well-validated test that has been used in research and

clinical settings for over 50 years. It is a reliable and valid measure of personality and socioemotional

functioning.

Reliability:

Reliability refers to the consistency of the test scores. The RISB has been shown 0.70 to 0.80. This means

that if a person takes the RISB twice, their scores will be similar on both occasions.

Validity:

Validity refers to the extent to which the test measures what it is supposed to measure. The RISB has been

shown to be valid in a number of ways.

Purpose:

The Risk Index for Suicide Prediction, or RISP test, is used to evaluate a person's risk of suicide. Mental

health professionals use it to determine which people, based on a variety of factors including suicidal

ideation, past suicide attempts, and psychiatric symptoms, may be more likely to commit suicide. The

RISP test aids in directing interventions and treatment planning to give persons who are suicidal at risk

the proper care and support.

Background information

The age of the subject is 24..His birth family belonged to the middle class. He is a [Link]

.His father is also shopkeeper, his mother is a homemaker. With one sisters and one brother, he is the

youngest member of the family. According to his report, his home is a friendly place. Along with being

calm and emotionally invested in their relationships, he also claims to be very practical and logical in his

thought processes. He gets upset and agitated over small things with ease. According to him, his brother-
in-law is the source of his greatest problems, and he is also quite close to her mother and sister. He has also

got great problem-solving skills. He reported that sometimes he can't manage all the things together but he

will manage it with very affectionately

Behavior observation:

Apparently, the client’s hygienic condition was good and he was well-dressed. The environment was calm

and he was comfortable and relaxed. He had listened all instructions carefully and had paid full attention

to the test. He answer all sentences in 20 minutes and he answered all the question with honestly . His

voice was clearly audible.

Interpretation:

Quantitative analysis:

The following data shows the quantitative analysis of recorded data from the client’s responses
Response Obtain score

Positive response

P1 12

P2 15

P3 0

Neutral response

N 27

Conflict response

C1 32

C2 60

C3 0

Total Score Cut off score

136 136-240
Qualitative Analysis:

The clients score is 136 which falls within the range of 136-240. These results indicate the client have a

positive average score.”

Conclusion:

It is concluded that that client have positive response they have clam personality they don't have any fear

phobia desire which gave them conflict [Link] societal point of view. He is a social person .Overall, he

has the tendency to be empathetic and realize various social evils at the same time have the potential to see

through others.
 References

Rotter, J. B. (1950). Incomplete Sentences: A Task Motivation Technique. Research Monographs, No. 74.

The Ohio State University, Bureau of Educational Research.

Appendix_D