Good Governance and Its Impact On Economic Development: A Systematic Literature Review
Good Governance and Its Impact On Economic Development: A Systematic Literature Review
Disclosure statement: Authors are not aware of any findings that might be
perceived as affecting the objectivity of this study.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3936217
Published online: 10 July 2020
Abstract
Good governance is a polymorphous concept that stems from economic and political science.
It is used both in the context of the management of public action and in a strategic perspective
of economic development. In this article, we are first interested in deconstructing the various
contributions to define and reaffirm the role of "good governance" in development strategies.
What is "good governance"? How does it have an impact on a country's economy?
This paper addresses the issue of causality between good governance and economic
development, by examining the inter-connections between economic development and
governance indicators to increase transparency and efficiency. The purpose of this article is to
organize a systematic literature review in a scientific manner from data collection, through data
selection, reading and finally data analysis.
The impact of good Governance in economic development differs in political system structure,
governance current characteristics and contextual factors. Although outcome factors are
influenced by contextual determinants, the governance characteristics are of great importance.
Keywords: Good Governance, Economic Development, Public Governance, Governance Indicators, Growth.
JEL Classification: H00, F63
Paper type: Theoretical Research
www.ijafame.org 48
ISSN: 2658-8455
Volume 1, Issue 1 (July, 2020), pp. 47-67.
www.ijafame.org
1. Introduction
Nowadays, the importance of the economic and social role of the Administration, in a context
of limited overall means and a continuously changing environment, calls for an appreciable
analysis as accurate as possible of the effects and impacts of the actions carried out by the public
authorities in the area of Good Governance on the economic development of the country. Good
governance implies a particular conception of the disclosure of the collective interests of the
stakeholders, the areas of public action and their coordination, with the aim of carrying out
effective and efficient public policies.
What is good governance? Public governance? What is its impact on the economy? The
academic literature on governance, which is increasing each year exponentially, provides a
plethora of definitions and connections. Indeed, the purpose of this paper is to introduce,
deconstruct, clarify and crossbreed the different ideas of the authors who have acquired
knowledge in this area.
Like most concepts in social, economic and political sciences, governance is not a new term.
In fact, the term governance was first used in France in the fourteenth century where it meant
“seat of government” The term became much more popular when the World Bank ‘reinvented’
governance in a World Bank Report of 1989. The use of the term governance by the World
Bank signaled a new approach to development that was based on the belief that economic
prosperity is not possible without a minimum level of rule-of-law and democracy. At the same
time, use of the seemingly apolitical term “governance” was valuable in preventing criticism
that the World Bank was trying to interfere in the political decisions made by debtor countries
(Bovaird & Loeffler, 2004).
The concept of governance has been discussed in political science and public administration
research for decades. Governance-broadly defined as the framework of rules, institutions, and
practices by which authority is exercises- is a key foundation of a well-functioning market
economy and a major ingredient to growth and equitable development (Al-Marhubi, 2004).
Indeed, governance can be addressed analytically by describing institutions as ‘the patterns
that emerge from the governing activities of social, political and administrative actors’ but also
by emphasizing processes meant for guiding, steering, controlling or managing sectors or facets
of societies (Kooiman, 2003).
The paper cannot and does not pretend to provide answers to all the questions, but instead
opens the way for discussion and clarification, by presenting a systemic literature review, and
exploring some of the many ways in which governance can impact the economy in general, and
economic development in particular.
2. Research Methodology
The key to doing research is through research. That is to mean that writing a scientific article
only starts with a scientific collection of references, which allows a scientific filtering based on
what is essential to read. As mentioned in the introduction, the purpose is to deconstruct the
subject of the research study. So, a part of this present paper aims to follow a scientific way to
choose the references, and to conduct a literature review that is firstly exploratory, and secondly
comprehensive in-depth literature review.
By the way, Systematic Literature Reviews are rapidly growing in importance in the social
sciences to aggregate findings across multiple empirical studies, a method which extensively
has been used in medical disciplines (Bilotta et al., 2014; Kampen and Tama´ s, 2013; Moore
et al., 2014). The first step in building up a literature review is to collect references, i.e. the
various works that have been conducted to identify the research subject. The effective method
49
Marwa Khouya, Abdelhay Benabdelhadi. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND ITS IMPACT ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: A
SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW.
is to search directly in scientific databases controlled, by keywords, which is generally the core
concept of the work "Governance".
Because of the surprisingly relative few numbers of references appearing in the searches, I
needed to make a modification. So I've added other terms to the main keyword, namely "good
governance", "public governance", "governance AND economic development". To filter my
references in function of my research requirements, and to appropriate it to the research issue.
This effective process has excluded for example research that has been made on corporate
governance, or environmental governance and has included only “public governance”
documents.
The exploratory systemic literature review is used to explore all of the references discovered,
in order to select the most pertinent references to read.
To do this, I have put all the references in my electronic library. I have chosen Zotero as my
reference management software, which allowed me to collect all the documents in an organized
way.
In addition, I opted for Zotero because it is free, and open source, and I did a doctoral course
on its handling and manipulation. It enables to manage, easily and simply, bibliographic data
and research documents.
In this sense, I have filled the metadata for each scientific paper, so I have mentioned the
author, the year, the name of the database in which I founded the document, the name of the
journal concerning the articles. And the abstract of each one.
My collected references include (Tab.1) a few theses to understand the structure of writing
a scientific manuscript, a few books that treat governance in a detailed way, a few chapters
including the contribution of authors among others who collaborate in a shared book. And a
wide range of scientific articles (just five from conferences) the rest are journal articles, which
is particularly the basis for this paper.
Afterwards, I downloaded my entire library and transferred it to the Nvivo1 software to
proceed with the textual analysis, at the first stage this analysis only concerns the abstracts of
each single document.
After transferring all the bibliographical documents into the Nvivo software, I proceeded to
the textual analysis of abstracts of each element in my library. The textual analysis of abstracts
1
NVivo is a qualitative data analysis (QDA) computer software package produced by QSR International. It
allows researchers to organize, analyze and find insights in unstructured.
www.ijafame.org 50
ISSN: 2658-8455
Volume 1, Issue 1 (July, 2020), pp. 47-67.
www.ijafame.org
reveals primarily which words are the most frequent and repeated. This indicates the interest of
the concept in each document. The word "Governance" is the most frequent word in our
analysis (Fig.1) it was found 1191 times in all the abstracts of the collected references.
The closest words to the term "governance" (Fig.1) are those that appear next to that term in
the abstracts of the references. And then the large words are more frequently repeated than the
others. What is interesting to know are the big words appearing next to "Governance"; this word
cloud makes it scientifically possible to identify in which reference the key words of the search
appear the most.
It is noticeable that the word "governance" is the largest in the above word cloud, although
it is the most frequent in all the references collected.
Words Frequency
Governance 1191
Pubic 483
Good 227
Development 203
Economic 188
Countries 171
Government 169
Research 160
Policy 160
Political 154
51
Marwa Khouya, Abdelhay Benabdelhadi. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND ITS IMPACT ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: A
SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW.
Article 123
Management 117
Source: Author’s processing.
The first 5 words (Tab.2), namely "governance", "public", "good", "development" and
"economic" are the most cited in all the summaries treated, which gives them the character of
an important element for filtering the reference documents in the selection process.
As a matter of fact, this study draws upon an analysis of the literature from the perspective
of an extended systematic literature review. Relevant studies were searched for in seven various
sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, Springer, ProQuest, Jstor and Google Scholar
(Tab.3).
Table 3: The references collected by source
Sources References in %
Scopus 42,61%
Web of Science 27,83%
Science Direct 21,30%
Jstor 3,04%
Springer 3,47%
ProQuest 1,30%
Google Scholar 0,43%
www.ijafame.org 52
ISSN: 2658-8455
Volume 1, Issue 1 (July, 2020), pp. 47-67.
www.ijafame.org
This justifies the fact that this topic is long-standing but still topical and inspires many
authors to contribute to the development of knowledge in this area.
Nevertheless, it is important to read the most recent work to know the latest conclusions of
the work that has been produced by the authors. This is why the papers of the last two years
(Current year and 2019s, 2018s) are the most voluminous (Fig.2), it enables us to visualize and
update the development of knowledge in this field.
In addition, and as notified above (Tab.1) 226 of the references are journal articles, so the
questions that arises is, where are these articles published? Are there journals dedicated
simultaneously on the same line of research? Effectively, the articles collected were published
mainly in the journal "Governance", followed by "World Development", "Public Policy and
Administration" and other journals presented in the graph below2 (Fig.3)
Governance
World Development
Public Policy and Administration
Land Use Policy
Public Management Review
The Journal of Politics
The European Journal of Development Research
International Journal of Project Management
Safety Science
International Journal of Public Administration
Economic Modelling
Source: Author’s processing.
So, 32 selected articles were published in the journal of "Governance", 12 articles in "World
Development" 12 in "Public Policy and Administration". Other papers were also recognized by
the selection including 8 articles in each of "Land Use Policy" and "Public Management
Review". And many other journals in which I have found important articles on the subject,
listed with details of the number of articles for each one (Appendix 1).
2
Only the journals with at least 2 articles were mentioned in the result.
53
Marwa Khouya, Abdelhay Benabdelhadi. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND ITS IMPACT ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: A
SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW.
From the established word cloud, I was able to identify where exactly each keyword appears,
in which reference, and how many times. Even more, I was also able to identify where 4 or 5
or all the principal keywords appear together. Through this method I decided my references to
be carefully read.
From the exploratory systemic literature review, I was able to select the most important
references from different scientific databases, saved in my Zotero Library.
The academic literature on governance, good governance and sustainable development
governance has grown rapidly. However, apart from the universal acceptance of its importance,
differences prevail in respect of theoretical formulations, policy prescriptions and
conceptualization of the subject itself and no one can claim ownership of the Governance
however modern theories have expanded the connotation, focusing on a large variety of
instruments designed to alter and channel the behavior of individual and collective actors
(Loorbach, 2007; Pierre and Peters, 2000; Adger and Jordan, 2009; Kardos, 2012).
According to The World Bank governance work of Kaufmann, Kraay and Mastruzzi (2006)
operates a set of aggregate governance indicators based on: access to voice and accountability;
lack of political instability and violence; minimum government effectiveness; existing
regulatory burden, the rule of law, concrete and visible efforts to eliminate bribery and
corruption. (Daniel Kaufmann et al., 2009).
Author
/Year Country Problematic Method Main Findings
/Journal
www.ijafame.org 54
ISSN: 2658-8455
Volume 1, Issue 1 (July, 2020), pp. 47-67.
www.ijafame.org
Application the
method Technique
for Order
Preference by
Similarity to Ideal -The countries that have been
Solution successful in this area in the
The evaluation of (TOPSIS). The long-term, in particular, are the
Ardielli,E Good Governance original data used Nordic countries: Finland,
(2019) development in in the research Sweden and Denmark.
Czech
Review of the European were the values of -On the contrary, there are
Republic
Economic Union countries in Worldwide countries that show greater
Perspectives the long-term. Governance shortcomings in terms of Good
Indicators Governance as Romania,
monitored and Bulgaria and Greece.
processed by the
World Bank. (In
the period 2007–
2017)
- The privatization did not have
a significant impact on both
income inequality and economic
growth.
Adams,S. The study Application of the
- Good governance had a
Mengistu,B examined the Least Squares
positive impact on economic
(2009) impact of Dummy Variable
growth and a negative impact on
Journal of United privatization on (LSDV) approach.
Developing
income inequality.
Kingdom economic growth In 82 developing
Societies - Foreign direct investment
and income countries between
(FDI) had a positive effect on
inequality. 1991 and 2002.
income inequality, but a
negligible impact on economic
growth.
55
Marwa Khouya, Abdelhay Benabdelhadi. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND ITS IMPACT ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: A
SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW.
- Public disclosure is an
indispensable part of
transparency, which is a key to
good governance (Disclosure of
assets and income of candidates
Kaufmann, D
for public office, civil servants,
(2005)
politicians and legislators,
Finance &
Development judges and their dependents,
individual and corporate
contributions to political
campaigns, campaign expenses,
-Analyzing the parliamentary votes, bills and
data that suggest parliamentary debates, budgets
that transparency and public meetings.)
Identification of
helps improve - Effective implementation of
the different
governance and conflict of interest laws,
"myths" that
reduce corruption, separating business, politics,
USA prevail over
essential legislation and public service,
governance and
ingredients for and adoption of a law governing
corruption.
better lobbying, and the punishment of
development and institutions found guilty of
economic growth. corruption in public
procurements.
- The right of access to
information and freedom of all
types of media is also a myth that
prevail over governance and
corruption.
- Ensuring the diagnosis of
governance and the anti-
corruption process in order to
implement transparency
programs at the local level.
Distinction
between The
- All the governance indicators
Worldwide
contain a measurement error.
Governance
But each indicator can reduce
Indicators. Those
Kaufmann, Method of the influence of measurement
that measure
D. and measurement error error individually, by
formal rules and
Kraay,A. in the assessments combining, organizing and
those that measure
(2008) of the summarizing information from
the practical
Munich USA organizations, and different sources.
application of
Personal of The Worldwide - The Worldwide Governance
those rules. What
RePEc Governance Indicators (WGI) are aggregated
Archive are the strengths
Indicators indicators from a variety of
and weaknesses of
sources, which combine
the two types of
information from a wide range
indicators and the
of sources.
complementarities
between them?
Al Mamun, The natural
Exploring the link - In countries with higher
M et al. logarithm of GDP
between economic globalization, QOG
(2017) per capita
Australia economic growth has a positive and significant
Economic (LGDPC) is used
and resources. effect on economic growth.
Modelling as a measure of
www.ijafame.org 56
ISSN: 2658-8455
Volume 1, Issue 1 (July, 2020), pp. 47-67.
www.ijafame.org
57
Marwa Khouya, Abdelhay Benabdelhadi. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND ITS IMPACT ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: A
SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW.
www.ijafame.org 58
ISSN: 2658-8455
Volume 1, Issue 1 (July, 2020), pp. 47-67.
www.ijafame.org
59
Marwa Khouya, Abdelhay Benabdelhadi. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND ITS IMPACT ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: A
SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW.
The approach is to
establish a new
institutional
approach to - Public institutions of
research and governance significantly
analysis of the influence the good governance
Why do some fundamental and poverty reduction situation
countries and their institutional issues in Tanzania, which in turn
systems of of the influences development
governance fail contemporary outcomes.
while others system of public - The functions of the
Mgonja, succeed? What is governance in institutions considered
B. E. S. (2010) wrong with Tanzania. To important for the achievement of
Canada
University of development study the good governance development
Alberta initiatives in relationship objectives have become much
Africa? between public simpler in Tanzania.
This manuscript institutions and - A dysfunction in the
concern the case governance in institutional mechanisms has a
of Tanzania local political straightforward impact on the
contexts in order system of public governance.
to analyze the This is another perspective on
impacts of good governance.
institutional
factors on good
governance.
- Sustainable Development
Strategies necessitate concern
for and involvement of the
-Using as
various vertical coordination
methodology the
mechanisms.
Kardos, M thematic content
The Reflection of - Vertical coordination consists
(2012) analysis, on how
Good Governance of disseminating good practices
Procedia - good governance
Romania in Sustainable of the public consultation
Social and is reflected in EU
Development process in order to bring
Behavioral countries
Strategies development strategies closer to
Sciences sustainable
the people.
development
- These strategies can be
strategies
portrayed as a change in their
behavior to one that is
increasingly sustainable.
-The results revealed that
Overview of the economic governance is
findings that show measured by economic freedom,
that Africa as a political governance is measured
Kwasi Fosu, The chapter region, since about by the Electoral
A provided an the end of the Competitiveness Index, and
(2017) account of the role 1990s, has executive constraint is measured
Rethinking
USA of governance in significantly by political stability indicators.
Governance
Africa’s economic improved per - Negative implications for the
and
Development
development. capita income, the allocation of fiscal resources
level of human lead to a likely disequilibrium
development and between the economy and
reduced poverty. politics.
www.ijafame.org 60
ISSN: 2658-8455
Volume 1, Issue 1 (July, 2020), pp. 47-67.
www.ijafame.org
61
Marwa Khouya, Abdelhay Benabdelhadi. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND ITS IMPACT ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: A
SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW.
The processes of good governance must include participation by the important stake holders
in the decision making. The processes need to emphasize decentralization of power structure
and participation in decision making (Kaufmann et al., 2004).
The study of good governance can be focused of the broad-based stake- holders and using
its financial, natural, and human resources in the interests of all people, and on the basis of the
principles of justice, fairness, equity, efficiency, transparency, and accountability (Farazmand,
2020). Also, one of the major elements of good governance is decentralization of
administration. ‘‘Decentralization can contribute to improved performance of local
government; it can provide new opportunities for responsiveness to local needs; it can mean
that if governance improves citizens may hold public officials and agencies more accountable.
Decentralization is not a linear or consistent process, and it can suffer reverses as often as
advances in terms of how local governments and citizens take up its challenges”(Grindle, 2007).
Another way adopted by Mgonja, B. E. S.(2010) , to analyze good governance of public systems
in Tanzania is the functioning of institutional mechanisms. this study revealed the importance
www.ijafame.org 62
ISSN: 2658-8455
Volume 1, Issue 1 (July, 2020), pp. 47-67.
www.ijafame.org
of public institutions, and their role considered necessary for the achievement of development
goals.
However, governance research developed into a more mature paradigm based on conceptual
clarity, a broad range of shared theories and methods, and empirical investigation both of the
scope conditions and the societal impacts of governance processes based on multi-actor
collaboration(Ansell & Torfing, 2016; Sørensen & Torfing, 2018)
Good governance is operationally defined by the various indicators on available data based
on the UN statistics. For this research, good (bad) governance is measured by an index based
on available data. The index includes: Lower Political Rights, Lower Civil Liberties, Corruption
Perception Index, Satisfaction with Life Index, Global Gender Gap Index, Lower Political Risk
Index, Human Development Index, Gini Index, Lower Education Attainment Level (Jamil et
al., 2013). It also combines hands-off tools such as institutional design and political, juridical
and discursive framing with hands-on tools such as process management, direct participation
and conversation (Bell & Hindmoor, 2009)
The first generations of governance research not only helped to clarify the concept of
governance (Kooiman, 2003) but also provided a thorough understanding of how interactive
forms of governance contribute to advancing the effectiveness and democratic quality of
modern governance (Sørensen & Torfing, 2018). Concerning Al Mamun et al. (2017) who
considered that the linkage between resources and economic growth is an unresolved empirical
puzzle with major opposing strands toward the quality of governance.
In this frame of literature review, it is debatable whether how good governance practices
lead to economic growth or to economic development. Among the works that focused on this
issue of public governance in economic development Kaufmann et al. (2004) claimed that
governance quality and economic growth are positively related. In their evaluation of the
worldwide governance indicators (WGI) from 1996 to 2002, they found that “per capita
incomes and the quality of governance are strongly positively correlated across countries”
On the one hand, there is a multitude of works (Anttiroiko, 2017; Epstein & Gang, 2019;
Goldsmith, 2007; Grindle, 2007; Daniel Kaufmann, 2005) that have opted for corruption and
the effort made by the State to control and reduce corruption as an explicative variable to
conduct the study in terms of good governance, to subsequently generate it on the economic
aspect.
In the other hand a very important question is about the interdependence of Good
Governance and socio-economic development (Haldenwang, 2004 and Agere, 2000).
Governance im-provement and country development are considered to be related issues. Many
authors discuss the relationship of the implementation of governance reforms and rapid
economic and social development. (Ardielli, 2019).
Noja et al. (2019) concluded that an overview of the implications of public administration
for the economy and development is significant in analyzing the relationship between good
public governance and sustainable economic development. As AlBassam (2013) argued, some
explanatory variables could contribute more than others to the analysis of the impact of good
governance on economic growth. For example, a country's type of political system could
influence how the economic crisis shapes the relationship between governance and growth in
that country. Kwon & Kim (2014) determined a causal link between good governance and
poverty reduction, out of the six WGIs tested, and the empirical evidence does not support the
hypothesis that good governance leads to poverty reduction. In contrast to Grindle, (2004) that
shows that the good governance has become a paramount strategy for reducing poverty,
following the structural disappearance of the adjustment policies, promoted by the IMF and the
World Bank in the 1980s and 1990s.
63
Marwa Khouya, Abdelhay Benabdelhadi. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND ITS IMPACT ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: A
SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW.
As for Kwasi Fosu (2014), he developed economic governance philosophy as a result of its
intersecting research between good governance and economics in his book of Rethinking
Governance and Development, he concluded that the economic governance measured by
economic freedom and political governance by the index of electoral competiveness, and
executive constraint and by indicators of political stability (2017). In Addition, Bauer & Becker
(2014) analyzed the economic governance, they focused on supranational executive's role in
the four areas of European Commission that have witnessed the most important changes:
financial stability support, economic policy surveillance, coordination of national polices and
supervision of the financial sector.
By that reasoning, to measure economic growth, GDP is generally employed, and to study
the impact of good governance, one or more aggregate governance indicators are used.
Nevertheless, the results of this study indicate that policymakers in countries should choose to
pay more attention to the quality of governance, particularly with regard to government
effectiveness and the rule of law, in order to promote the future growth rate of real GDP per
capita (Huang & Ho, 2017).
The relationship between the quality of governance and the economy demonstrates that
governance quality has a positive effect on economic development (Anttiroiko, 2017; Liu et al.,
2018) i.e. that good governance presents diminishing marginal returns, which means that the
high-speed economic growth effect becomes less and less, . i.e. while the high-quality economic
development effect becomes more and more, At least in the developed countries, such are the
cases studied in China, New Zealand, Finland and Singapore.
Likewise, Adams & Mengistu (2008) found that good governance had a positive impact on
economic growth and a negative impact on income inequality in their work in 82 developing
countries. Omri & Ben Mabrouk (2020) were concerned with economic development, but in its
sustainable aspect. But they also deduced that political and institutional governance - which are
part of good public governance - contribute positively to the components of sustainable
development. Through this research, we understand that there are reciprocal links between
human development and economic growth, and that one impacts the other.
It turns out that during economic crises, most governments focus more on economic growth
than on governance development (Daniel Kaufmann et al., 2009). It must also be affirmed that
in order to successfully carry out public strategies in terms of governance, development and
good governance initiatives must first be based on the local needs of the country.
According to the requirements of its population and economy rather than on what is decided
from outside, for example, on the case of the study in India (Behera, 2019).
Altogether, several academic research studies have examined the relationship between good
public governance and the economy of a country, which can be classified according to the
impact on economic growth, economic development, or the economic regulatory and legal
framework.
Furthermore, this theoretical paper studied the contribution of governance on economic
development. It is part of the normative theory of the public economy which is interested in
market failure. The economic development emphasizes the importance of the distributive and
corrective role of the state in dealing with the imperfections and externalities engendered by
irresponsible behavior fueled by the feeling of not being afraid of penalties.(Hadj Fraj et al.,
2018)
4. Conclusion
The research study was selected according to a two-step procedure. First, the search results
were filtered by title and then by abstract (Exploratory Systematic Literature Review), and then
www.ijafame.org 64
ISSN: 2658-8455
Volume 1, Issue 1 (July, 2020), pp. 47-67.
www.ijafame.org
reduced according to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Those excluded were references to
studies that were a title and an abstract far from the subject matter. The other studies were
selected for a full text search (Extended Systematic Literature Review) They were thoroughly
read and understood.
This paper has revealed through an extended systemic literature review that good governance
is a prerequisite for economic development, by cross-referencing the ideas of different authors,
multitudes of works, and even incompatible results. This is because of the territory and time in
which the studies were conducted.
Each country has its specific characteristics, its political history, and its own public
management process. In the final part of the document, the study examined that Good
governance in public area is pivotal to contemporary national of economic development
strategy, it contributes to long-term strategic policy objectives and involvement, to the
coherence of policies through vertical and horizontal coordination.
Consequently, good governance is an open and transparent process that carries out the
involvement, integration and accountability of stakeholders and brings economic development
strategies closer together. The results of the study suggest that particular country characteristics
may be more important in promoting growth than any economic policy in itself. This and other
important issues may be subject for future research.
Finally, in the hope that this work will open the search for more productive research in the
intersection of the disciplines of public management and economics, which is a potentially
fruitful area of scientific research.
Appendices
Appendix 1: List of principal journals
65
Marwa Khouya, Abdelhay Benabdelhadi. GOOD GOVERNANCE AND ITS IMPACT ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: A
SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW.
References:
(1) Adams, S., & Mengistu, B. (2008). Privatization, governance and economic development
in developing countries. Journal of Developing Societies, 24(4), 415-438.
(2) Mamun, M. A., Sohag, K., & Hassan, M. K. (2017). Governance, resources and
growth. Economic Modelling, 63, 238-61.
(3) AlBassam, B. A. (2013). The relationship between governance and economic growth
during times of crisis. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(2), 1-1.
(4) Al‐Marhubi, F. (2004). The determinants of governance: A cross‐country
analysis. Contemporary Economic Policy, 22(3), 394-406.
(5) Ansell, C. et Torfing, J. (éd.). (2016). Manuel sur les théories de la
gouvernance . Éditions Edward Elgar.
(6) Anttiroiko, A. V. (2017). Emulating models of good governance: learning from the
developments of the world's least corrupt countries. International journal of public
policy, 13(1-2), 21-35.
(7) Ardielli, E. (2019). Use of TOPSIS method for assessing of good governance in European
Union countries. Review of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), 211-231.
(8) Bauer, M. W., & Becker, S. (2014). The unexpected winner of the crisis: The European
Commission’s strengthened role in economic governance. Journal of European
Integration, 36(3), 213-229.
(9) Behera, A. (2019). Politics of Good Governance and Development in Maoist Affected
Scheduled Areas in India: A Critical Engagement. Studies in Indian Politics, 7(1), 44-55.
(10) Bell, S., & Hindmoor, A. (2009). Rethinking governance: The centrality of the state in
modern society. Cambridge University Press.
(11) Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2004). Understanding public management and governance.
In Public management and governance (pp. 27-38). Routledge.
www.ijafame.org 66
ISSN: 2658-8455
Volume 1, Issue 1 (July, 2020), pp. 47-67.
www.ijafame.org
(12) Epstein, G. S., & Gang, I. N. (2019). Inequality, good governance, and endemic
corruption. International Tax and Public Finance, 26(5), 999-1017.
(13) Akosa, F., & Asare, B. E. (2017). Street-level bureaucrats and the exercise of
discretion. Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance,
1-6
(14) Goldsmith, A. A. (2007). Is governance reform a catalyst for
development?. Governance, 20(2), 165-186.
(15) Grindle, M. S. (2004). Good enough governance: poverty reduction and reform in
developing countries. Governance, 17(4), 525-548.
(16) Grindle, M. S. (2007). Good enough governance revisited. Development policy
review, 25(5), 533-574.
(17) Fraj, S. H., Hamdaoui, M., & Maktouf, S. (2018). Governance and economic growth: The
role of the exchange rate regime. International economics, 156, 326-364
(18) Huang, C. J., & Ho, Y. H. (2017). Governance and economic growth in Asia. The North
American Journal of Economics and Finance, 39, 260-272.
(19) Jamil, I., Askvik, S., & Dhakal, T. N. (2013). Understanding governance in south Asia.
In In search of better governance in South Asia and beyond (pp. 13-35).
(20) Kardos, M. (2012). The reflection of good governance in sustainable development
strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1166-1173.
(21) Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2003). Governance matters III: Governance
indicators for 1996–2002. The World Bank.
(22) Kaufmann, D. (2005). Back to basics-10 myths about governance and
corruption. Finance and Development-English Edition, 42(3), 41-43.
(23) Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2009). Governance matters VIII: Aggregate
and individual governance indicators 1996-2008. The World Bank.
(24) Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. Sage.
(25) Fosu, A. K. (2018). Rethinking governance and development. In The palgrave handbook
of African politics, governance and development (pp. 883-898).
(26) Kwon, H. J., & Kim, E. (2014). Poverty reduction and good governance: Examining the
rationale of the Millennium Development Goals. Development and Change, 45(2), 353-
375.
(27) Liu, J., Tang, J., Zhou, B., & Liang, Z. (2018). The effect of governance quality on
economic growth: Based on China’s provincial panel data. Economies, 6(4), 56.
67