“QUESTIONNAIRE VALIDATION INSTRUMENT”
Using the criterial developed for evaluating survey questionnaire set forth by Carter V. Good and
Douglas B. Scates, please evaluate the attached self-made survey instrument for the proposed study.
Research Title: _____________________________________________
Validator’s Personal Information
1. Name: ___________________________________________ Sex: ___ Age: ____
2. Educational Qualification: ____________________________________________
3. Major/Specialization: ________________________________________________
4. Years of Teaching Experience: _______
Validation Instrument
Instruction: Please evaluate and rate the validity of the Instrument using the following
numerical equivalents:
5 = Excellent 3 = Good 1 = Poor
4 = Very Good 2 = Fair
___ 1. The instrument is short enough that the respondents will be able to answer within the
allocated time.
___ 2. The instrument is interesting and has appeal, such the respondents will be induced
to respond to it and accomplish it fully.
___ 3. The instrument can obtain some depth to the answer and guess work.
___ 4. The questions and alternative responses are neither too suggestive nor not
stimulating.
___ 5. The instrument can elicit responses, which are definite and not conflicting.
___ 6. The questions are stated in a way that respondents can understand them clearly.
___ 7. The questions are formed in such a manner to avoid suspicion on the part of the
respondents concerning hidden answers on the test.
___ 8. The instrument is neither too narrow nor limited in its content.
___ 9. The answer to the problems when taken as a whole could answer the basic purpose
of which the instrument is designed and considered valid.
Recommendation:
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
__________________________ ______________________
Validator’s Name and Signature Date
“Validation Result”
Rating : 5 - Excellent
4 - Very Good
3 - Good
2 - Fair
1 - Poor
J J J J J M
u u u u u E
r r r r r A
N
y y y y y
Criteria for Validation
1 2 3 4 5
Interpretation
1. The instrument is short
enough that the
respondents will be able to 5 5 4 4 4 4.40 Excellent
answer within the allocated
time.
2. The instrument is
interesting and has appeal Very Good
such the respondents will 5 4 4 4 4 4.20
be induced to respond to it
and accomplish it fully.
3. The instrument can obtain
some depth to the answer 5 4 5 4 4 4.40 Excellent
and guess work.
4. The questions and
alternative responses are
4 5 3 5 4 4.20
neither too suggestive nor Very Good
too not stimulating.
5. The instrument can elicit
responses, which are
4 4 3 5 5 4.20
definite and not Very Good
conflicting.
6. The questions are stated in
a way that respondents
5 4 4 4 5 4.40 Excellent
can understand them
clearly.
7. The questions are formed
in such a manner to avoid Excellent
suspicion on the part of
5 5 4 4 5 4.60
the respondents
concerning hidden
answers on the test.
8. The instrument is neither
too narrow nor limited in 4 4 4 4 4 4.00 Very Good
its content.
9. The answer to the
problems when taken as a
whole could answer the Very Good
4 4 5 4 4 4.20
basic purpose of which
the instrument is designed
and considered valid.
10. The questions are Excellent
relevant to the present 5 4 5 5 4 4.60
study.
Very Good
TOTAL 4.32
