Definition and Nature of Diplomacy

Diplomacy

Diplomacy, practices and institutions by which nations conduct their relations

with one another. Originally, the English term diplomatic referred to the care
and evaluation of official papers or archives, many of which were treaties. In
the 18th century diplomatic documents increasingly meant those pertaining to
international relations, and the term diplomatic corps was used to signify the
body of ambassadors and officials attached to foreign missions. In 1796 the
British philosopher Edmund Burke criticizes the French for their “double
diplomacy” during the Napoleonic Wars; since then the term diplomacy has
been associated with international politics and foreign policy.

The term “diplomacy” refers to the interaction between nation-states.

Traditionally, diplomacy was carried out by government officials–diplomats–
who negotiated treaties, trade policies, and other international agreements.
The process of negotiations ranges from very formal to informal, but it tends to
be fairly adversarial and competitive, relying on distributive or positional
bargaining strategies that assume a win-lose situation.

In simple terms, Diplomacy means the management of the international

relations by negotiations; it is also the method by which these relations are
carefully and intelligently adjusted and maintained. Diplomacy is the art of
representing a nation’s national interests abroad, through the use of
peaceful measures Diplomacy is the application of intelligence and tact to
the conduct of official relations between the governments of independent
states.

Diplomacy as an art of maintaining organized relations among the states is

obviously, the foundation of state craft. Diplomacy also refers the skillful
conduction of the relation between States. The main purpose of diplomacy is
to avoid a condition of conflict or war to the last possible extent, but if war
breaks out, diplomacy assumes a different form for the sake of protecting and
promoting the “National Interest” of a state. The following implications may be
drawn from what we have said above about the meaning and nature of
diplomacy:

 Diplomacy is the art of conducting negotiations with other states of the

world so as to remove or narrow down the areas of disagreements and
misunderstandings and thereby maintaining good relations as far as
possible.
 These negotiations are conducted to protect and promote “National
Interest”. For this purpose foreign policy is formulated by the
government and that will be implemented through the diplomats.
  Maintenance of the peace without injuring the interest of the state is a
major objective of diplomacy.
 Diplomacy is the applied form of foreign policy. Hence, there should
be no conflict or contradiction between what the foreign policy makers
affirm and what the professional diplomats do.
 Modern diplomacy is closely related to the state system; it is inseparably
bound to inter state representation.
 Diplomacy is a key concept in world politics. It refers to a process of
communication and negotiation between states and other international
actors
 Diplomacy began in the ancient world but took on a recognizably
modern form from the fifteenth century onwards with the establishment
of the permanent embassy.
 By the end of the nineteenth century all states had a network of
embassies abroad linked to foreign departments at home. Diplomacy
had also become an established profession.

Diplomacy and Foreign Policy:

 Diplomacy plays a key role in the foreign policies of states and other
international actors
 A diplomatic ‘machinery’ (minimally a foreign department and overseas
representation) may be highly developed or fundamentally depending
upon the actor but it performs important functions in the making and the
implementation of foreign policy
 Diplomacy involves persuading other actors to do (or not to do) what
you want (don’t want) them to do. To be effective, diplomacy may need
to be supplemented by other instruments, but negotiating skills are
central to the art of diplomacy.
 Diplomacy combined with other instruments (military, economic etc.) is
called mixed diplomacy. Here, diplomacy becomes a communications
channel through which the use or threatened use of other instruments is
transmitted to other parties.
 Diplomacy usually has comparative advantages over other instrument in
terms of availability and cost.
 In complex, multilateral negotiations, diplomacy has become less an art
form and more a management process reflecting high levels of
interdependence between nation societies.

The United Nations, with its headquarters in New York City, is the largest
international diplomatic organization.

Diplomacy is the art and practice of conducting negotiations between

representatives of groups or states. It usually refers to international diplomacy,
the conduct of international relations through the intercession of professional
diplomats with regard to issues of peace-making, trade, war, economics and
culture. International treaties are usually negotiated by diplomats prior to
endorsement by national politicians.

The word stems from the Greek word “diploma”, which literally means ‘folded
in two’. In ancient Greece, a diploma was a certificate certifying completion of
a course of study, typically folded in two. In the days of the Roman Empire,
the word “diploma” was used to describe official travel documents, such as
passports and passes for imperial roads, that were stamped on double metal
plates. Later, the meaning was extended to cover other official documents
such as treaties with foreign tribes. In the 1700s the French called their body
of officials attached to foreign legations the corps “diplomatique”. The word
“diplomacy” was first introduced into the English language by Edmund Burke
in 1796, based on the French word “diplomatie”.

In an informal or social sense, diplomacy is the employment of tact to gain

strategic advantage or to find mutually acceptable solutions to a common
challenge, one set of tools being the phrasing of statements in a non-
confrontational, or polite manner.

Diplomats and diplomatic missions

A diplomat is someone involved in diplomacy; the collective term for a group

of diplomats from a single country who reside in another country is a
diplomatic mission. Ambassador is the most senior diplomatic rank; a
diplomatic mission headed by an ambassador is known as an embassy, with
the exception of permanent missions at the United Nations, the Organization
of American States, or other multilateral organizations, which are also headed
by ambassadors. The collective body of all diplomats of particular country is
called that country’s diplomatic service. The collective body of all diplomats
assigned to a particular country is the diplomatic corps. (See also diplomatic
rank.)

Diplomatic strategy

Real world diplomatic negotiations are very different from intellectual debates
in a university where an issue is decided on the merit of the arguments and
negotiators make a deal by splitting the difference. Though diplomatic
agreements can sometimes be reached among liberal democratic nations by
appealing to higher principles, most real world diplomacy has traditionally
been heavily influenced by hard power.

The interaction of strength and diplomacy can be illustrated by a comparison

to labor negotiations. If a labor union is not willing to strike, then the union is
not going anywhere because management has absolutely no incentive to
agree to union demands. On the other hand, if management is not willing to
take a strike, then the company will be walked all over by the labor union, and
management will be forced to agree to any demand the union makes. The
same concept applies to diplomatic negotiations.

There are also incentives in diplomacy to act reasonably, especially if the

support of other actors is needed. The gain from winning one negotiation can
be much less than the increased hostility from other parts. This is also called
soft power.

Many situations in modern diplomacy are also rules based. When for instance
two WTO countries have trade disputes, it is in the interest of both to limit the
spill over damage to other areas by following some agreed-upon rules.

Diplomatic immunity

The sanctity of diplomats has long been observed. This sanctity has come to
be known as diplomatic immunity. While there have been a number of cases
where diplomats have been killed, this is normally viewed as a great breach of
honour. Genghis Khan and the Mongols were well known for strongly insisting
on the rights of diplomats, and they would often wreak horrific vengeance
against any state that violated these rights.

Diplomatic rights were established in the mid-seventeenth century in Europe

and have spread throughout the world. These rights were formalized by the
1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, which protects diplomats
from being persecuted or prosecuted while on a diplomatic mission. If a
diplomat does commit a serious crime while in a host country he may be
declared as persona non grata (unwanted person). Such diplomats are then
often tried for the crime in their homeland.

Diplomatic communications are also viewed as sacrosanct, and diplomats

have long been allowed to carry documents across borders without being
searched. The mechanism for this is the so-called “diplomatic bag” (or, in
some countries, the “diplomatic pouch”). While radio and digital
communication have become more standard for embassies, diplomatic
pouches are still quite common and some countries, including the United
States, declare entire shipping containers as diplomatic pouches to bring
sensitive material (often building supplies) into a country.

In times of hostility, diplomats are often withdrawn for reasons of personal

safety, as well as in some cases when the host country is friendly but there is
a perceived threat from internal dissidents. Ambassadors and other diplomats
are sometimes recalled temporarily by their home countries as a way to
express displeasure with the host country. In both cases, lower-level
employees still remain to actually do the business of diplomacy.

Diplomats as a Guarantee
In the Ottoman Empire, the diplomats of Persia and other states were seen as
a guarantee of good behavior. If a nation broke a treaty or if their nationals
misbehaved the diplomats would be punished. Diplomats were thus used as
an enforcement mechanism on treaties and international law. To ensure that
punishing a diplomat mattered rulers insisted on high-ranking figures. This
tradition is seen by supporters of Iran as a legal basis of the 1979 Iranian
hostage crisis. In imitation of alleged previous practices supporters of the
Iranian Revolution attempted to punish the United States for its alleged
misdeeds by holding their diplomats hostage. Diplomats as a guarantee were
also employed sometimes in pre-modern Europe and other parts of Asia.

Diplomacy and espionage

Diplomacy is closely linked to espionage or gathering of intelligence.

Embassies are bases for both diplomats and spies, and some diplomats are
essentially openly-acknowledged spies. For instance, the job of military
attachés includes learning as much as possible about the military of the nation
to which they are assigned. They do not try to hide this role and, as such, are
only invited to events allowed by their hosts, such as military parades or air
shows. There are also deep-cover spies operating in many embassies. These
individuals are given fake positions at the embassy, but their main task is to
illegally gather intelligence, usually by coordinating spy rings of locals or other
spies. For the most part, spies operating out of embassies gather little
intelligence themselves and their identities tend to be known by the
opposition. If discovered, these diplomats can be expelled from an embassy,
but for the most part counter-intelligence agencies prefer to keep these agents
in situ and under close monitoring.

The information gathered by spies plays an increasingly important role in

diplomacy. Arms-control treaties would be impossible without the power of
reconnaissance satellites and agents to monitor compliance. Information
gleaned from espionage is useful in almost all forms of diplomacy, everything
from trade agreements to border disputes.

Diplomatic resolution of problems

Various processes and procedures have evolved over time for handling
diplomatic issues and disputes.

Arbitration and mediations

Nations sometimes resort to international arbitration when faced with a

specific question or point of contention in need of resolution. For most of
history, there were no official or formal procedures for such proceedings. They
were generally accepted to abide by general principles and protocols related
to international law and justice.
Sometimes these took the form of formal arbitrations and mediations. In such
cases a commission of diplomats might be convened to hear all sides of an
issue, and to come some sort of ruling based on international law.

In the modern era, much of this work is often carried out by the International
Court of Justice at the Hague, or other formal commissions, agencies and
tribunals, working under the United Nations. Below are some examples.

Hay-Herbert Treaty Enacted after the United States and Britain submitted a
dispute to international mediation about the US-Canadian border.

Conferences

Other times, resolutions were sought through the convening of international

conferences. In such cases, there are fewer ground rules, and fewer formal
applications of international law. However, participants are expected to guide
themselves through principles of international fairness, logic, and protocol.

Some examples of these formal conferences are:

Congress of Vienna (1815) – After Napoleon was defeated, there were many
diplomatic questions waiting to be resolved. This included the shape of the
map of Europe, the disposition of political and nationalist claims of various
ethnic groups and nationalities wishing to have some political autonomy, and
the resolution of various claims by various European powers.

The Congress of Berlin (June 13 – July 13, 1878) was a meeting of the
European Great Powers’ and the Ottoman Empire’s leading statesmen in
Berlin in 1878. In the wake of the Russo-Turkish War, 1877–78, the meeting’s
aim was to reorganize conditions in the Balkans.

Negotiations

Sometimes nations convene official negotiation processes to settle an issue or

dispute between several nations which are parties to a dispute. These are
similar to the conferences mentioned above, as there are technically no
established rules or procedures. However, there are general principles and
precedents which help define a course for such proceedings.

Some examples are

Camp David accord Convened in 1978 by President Jimmy Carter of the

United States, at Camp David to reach an agreement between Prime Minister
Mechaem Begin of Israel and President Anwar Sadat of Egypt. After weeks of
negotiation, agreement was reached and the accords were signed, later
leading directly to the Israel-Egypt Peace Treaty of 1979.
Treaty of Portsmouth Enacted after President Theodore Roosevelt brought
together the delegates from Russia and Japan, to settle the Russo-Japanese
War. Roosevelt’s personal intervention settled the conflict, and caused him to
win the Nobel peace prize.

Diplomatic recognition

Diplomatic recognition is an important factor in determining whether a nation

is an independent state. Receiving recognition is often difficult, even for
countries which are fully sovereign. For many decades after becoming
independent, even many of the closest allies of the Dutch Republic refused to
grant it full recognition. Today there are a number of independent entities
without widespread diplomatic recognition, most notably the Republic of China
on Taiwan. Since the 1970s, most nations have stopped officially recognizing
the ROC’s existence on Taiwan, at the insistence of the People’s Republic of
China. Currently, the United States and other nations maintain informal
relations through de facto embassies, with names such as the American
Institute in Taiwan. Similarly, Taiwan’s de facto embassies abroad are known
by names such as the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office.
This was not always the case, with the US maintaining official diplomatic ties
with the ROC, recognizing it as the sole and legitimate government of all of
China until 1979, when these relations were broken off as a condition for
establishing official relations with Communist China.

The Palestinian National Authority has its own diplomatic service, however
Palestinian representatives in most Western countries are not accorded
diplomatic immunity, and their missions are referred to as Delegations
General.

Other unrecognized regions which claim independence include Abkhazia,

Transnistria, Somaliland, South Ossetia, Nagorno Karabakh, and the Turkish
Republic of Northern Cyprus. Lacking the economic and political importance
of Taiwan, these nations tend to be much more diplomatically isolated.

Though used as a factor in judging sovereignty, Article 3 of the Montevideo

Convention states, “The political existence of the state is independent of
recognition by other states.”

Informal diplomacy

Informal diplomacy (sometimes called Track II diplomacy) has been used for
centuries to communicate between powers. Most diplomats work to recruit
figures in other nations who might be able to give informal access to a
country’s leadership. In some situations, such as between the United States
and the People’s Republic of China a large amount of diplomacy is done
through semi-formal channels using interlocutors such as academic members
of thinktanks. This occurs in situations where governments wish to express
intentions or to suggest methods of resolving a diplomatic situation, but do not
wish to express a formal position.

Track II diplomacy is a specific kind of informal diplomacy, in which non-

officials (academic scholars, retired civil and military officials, public figures,
social activists) engage in dialogue, with the aim of conflict resolution, or
confidence-building. Sometimes governments may fund such Track II
exchanges. Sometimes the exchanges may have no connection at all with
governments, or may even act in defiance of governments; such exchanges
are called Track III.

Paradiplomacy

Paradiplomacy refers to the international relations conducted by subnational,

regional, local or non-central governments. The most ordinary case of
paradiplomatic relation refer to co-operation between bordering political
entities. However, interest of federal states, provinces, regions etc., may
extend over to different regions or to issues gathering local governments in
multilateral fora worldwide. Some non-central governments may be allowed to
negotiate and enter into agreement with foreign central states.

Cultural diplomacy

Cultural diplomacy is a part of diplomacy. It alludes to a new way of making

diplomacy by involving new non governmental and non professional actors in
the making of diplomacy. In the frame of globalization, culture plays a major
role in the definition of identity and in the relations between people. Joseph
Nye points out the importance of having a soft power besides a hard power.
When classical diplomacy fails, a better knowledge can help bridging the gap
between different cultures. Cultural diplomacy becomes a subject of academic
studies based on historical essays on the United States, Europe, and the Cold
War.