Surgeons' Insights on New IOLs
Surgeons' Insights on New IOLs
ARTIS SYMBIOSE
This complementary lens system
provides mix-and-match IOLs
by design.
I
have, over the past 6 months,
had the privilege of using a
new trifocal lens system, the
Artis Symbiose (Cristalens). The
system consists of a complementary
pair of lenses. One lens, the Plus, is
designed for increased near vision
and implanted in the nondominant Figure 2. The defocus curves—in each eye and binocularly—of an individual implanted with the Artis Symbiose.
eye. The other lens, the Mid, is
designed to provide relatively more preserving continuous phase, with At last data audit, we had
intermediate vision and implanted in none of the phase inversion or loss of performed 105 implantations of the
the dominant eye. The lens system is focus seen as troughs in the defocus Artis Symbiose, of which 50 were
different from other trifocal offerings curves of other diffractive lenses bilateral and five were unilateral
in providing depth of focus by (Figure 1). Plus lenses in patients who were
s
undergoing monocular cataract Patients were overall very satisfied, The lens system is a welcome
surgery or who had undergone and only three spontaneously reported addition to the armamentarium of
surgery elsewhere in the other eye a difference in near vision between trifocal lenses. Binocularly, the Artis
with a less-than-satisfactory result. the two eyes. All patients had good Symbiose system provides good vision
At 6 weeks postoperative, 84% were intermediate vision right away with an at all distances with what appears to
within ±0.50 D of emmetropia, and overall wow response reminiscent of be a reduced time for adaptation.
100% were within ±1.00 D. Binocular LASIK. Although halos were reported,
uncorrected distance visual acuity no patient complained about this
(UDVA) was 20/20 or better in 83% being debilitating or interfering with SHERAZ M. DAYA, MD, FACP, FACS, FRCS(ED),
of eyes, uncorrected near visual acuity the ability to drive. FRCOPHTH
n M edical Director, Centre for Sight, East Grinstead,
(UNVA) was 20/25 or better in 86% The defocus curves were interesting,
of eyes, and uncorrected intermediate in that there were no troughs with United Kingdom
n C hief Medical Editor, CRST Europe
visual acuity (UIVA) at 60 and 80 cm good vision at all distances from both
n s daya@[Link]
was 20/25 or better and 20/20 or bet- Mid and Plus lenses with a binocular
n F inancial disclosure: None
ter, respectively, both in 97% of eyes. cumulative effect (Figure 2).
I
a wider sweet spot with enhanced was significantly better in the Eyhance
began using the Tecnis Eyhance intermediate vision. It does not group than the Tecnis group, while
(model ICB00, Johnson & rely on diffractive optics, rings, or distance and near visual acuities
Johnson Vision) monofocal lens zones. Rather, the broader defocus is were similar between the two groups
with enhanced intermediate achieved through an aspheric surface (Figure 3). There were no significant
vision about 1 year ago. For the with continuous increase in power differences in photopic contrast
many patients under public health from the periphery to the center of sensitivity, light scatter, modulation
systems who cannot afford or do not the lens. transfer function cutoff, Strehl ratio,
have access to presbyopia-correcting Use of this lens is an easy transition or glare and halo perception between
IOLs, this lens makes it possible for any surgeon who is familiar the groups.
IOL but would still like to maximize choice for patients with a high n F inancial disclosure: None
T
he FineVision Triumf refraction of plano to -0.25 D for
(PhysIOL; Figure 4), is a two reasons.
trifocal IOL with EDOF First, we wanted the sphere to be
optical technology. I was one consistently on target to calculate a
of the first two surgeons worldwide universal A-constant. Second, we have
to implant the Triumf IOL, and I am found that a slight myopic spherical
now participating in a prospective equivalent helps patients to achieve
multicenter study of the lens. better near vision.
The Triumf is made of PhysIOL’s
proprietary glistening-free
s
RESULTS
The mean monocular UDVA in “THE MAJOR DIFFERENCE IN THE DESIGN
these 78 eyes was 20/22, with 75%
of patients achieving 20/20 or better
OF THE TRIUMF, IN COMPARISON WITH THE
and 79% achieving 20/25 or better. FINEVISION TRIFOCAL IOL, IS THE HEIGHT OF
Mean monocular CDVA was 20/20,
with 11% of eyes achieving 20/16 THE STEPS IN ITS DUAL BIFOCAL ELEMENTS. ”
or better and 96% achieving 20/20
or better.
It is unusual to obtain results this —ROBERT EDWARD ANG, MD
good on a multifocal IOL platform.
We attribute these results to the
chromatic aberration characteristics
of the Triumf, which I will discuss intermediate acuities remain strong. Patients enrolled in the study
further later in this article. When the influence of the slight to date have been highly satisfied.
Mean monocular UIVA at myopia was corrected, about 75% of All patients reported spectacle
6 months postoperative was 20/23, patients still achieved 20/25 DCNVA. independence at distance and
with 46% of patients achieving 20/20 intermediate, and 95.7% reported
or better and 89% achieving 20/25 or GOOD VISION AT ALL DISTANCES spectacle independence at near. Only
better. When patients were corrected From these results, we determined 4.3% of patients reported needing
for distance, the mean UIVA was that mean visual acuity through glasses for near vision tasks some of
approximately 20/22, with 64% of all distances can be expected to be the time, and none reported needing
patients achieving 20/20 or better about 20/25. them all or most of the time.
and 89% achieving 20/25 or better. The defocus curves, based on
The mean monocular UNVA with visual acuity outcomes from distance, CONCLUSION
the Triumf was 20/25. Further, 46% intermediate, and near visual acuity We attribute the improved
of patients achieved 20/20 or better tests, showed that the lens provides vision and contrast sensitivity
and 68% achieved 20/25 or better. patients with a broad range of with the Triumf to its chromatic
This is an excellent result, showing vision (monocular: -3.20 to +1.30 D aberration-free optical design, which
that near vision is not sacrificed with [31 cm to infinity]; binocular: -3.80 to corrects longitudinal chromatic
the Triumf, even as distance and +1.50 D [26 cm to infinity]). aberration. The major difference
in the design of the Triumf, in
comparison with the FineVision
trifocal IOL, is the height of the
steps in its dual bifocal elements.
This difference in design controls
chromatic aberration. This does
not correct the natural chromatic
aberration of the eye, but it does
correct any chromatic aberration
introduced by the diffractive optic
of the IOL (Figure 5). The expected
benefit is an improvement of
visual quality and high contrast
sensitivity.
T
he IC-8 IOL (AcuFocus; UIVA was 0.83 logMAR (20/24), and
Figure 6) combines an UNVA was 0.66 logMAR (20/30).2
aspheric monofocal IOL With respect to binocular vision,
with an embedded opaque 99%, 95%, and 79% of patients
mini-ring to simultaneously address enrolled in the trial had achieved
refractive error and presbyopia. 20/32 or better UDVA, UIVA, and
The one-piece hydrophobic acrylic UNVA, respectively.2
IOL, which has modified C-loop The majority of the 105 patients
haptics, an overall diameter of (95.9%) reported that they would
12.5 mm, a 6-mm biconvex aspheric select the IC-8 IOL again, and most
optic, and a square 360º posterior (84.8%) reported using spectacles
edge is implanted in the capsular bag occasionally to never. Binocular
at the time of cataract surgery. The contrast sensitivity matched the
embedded annular mask of the IOL monocular contrast sensitivity
has an outer diameter of 3.23 mm achieved in the contralateral eye with
and a central aperture diameter of a monofocal IOL.
1.36 mm. Patients in this study and others
have tolerated as much as 1.00 D of
WELL TOLERATED, MORE FORGIVING residual refractive error, suggesting
THAN OTHER IOLS that the small-aperture concept of
H. BURKHARD DICK, MD, PHD, The IC-8 IOL has the CE Mark, and the IC-8 IOL may be more forgiving
FEBOS-CR the company announced in June than monofocal and multifocal
2019 that enrollment for the pivotal IOLs.2 Notably, astigmatic patients
US Investigational Device Exemption in a prospective clinical trial
IC-8 study had been completed. That
12-month prospective, multicenter,
who received an IC-8 IOL and no
additional astigmatic management
nonrandomized case control clinical were able to tolerate up to 1.50 D of
Small-aperture optics provide an trial is designed to evaluate the refractive astigmatism.3
effective physiologic improvement in vision with the IC-8
IOL at all distances compared with SUITABLE FOR A BROAD RANGE OF
presbyopia-correcting traditional monofocal IOLs.1 PATIENTS
I participated in a multicenter A capsular bag implant such as the
solution for a range of postmarket European trial IC-8 IOL is suitable for a broad range
accommodation loss, regardless of the IC-8 IOL implanted in
105 patients. In that study, 6 months
of patients, including those with
irregular corneas.4,5 The implant can
of cataract status. after implantation, monocular UDVA be used in patients with naturally
was 0.87 logMAR (20/23 Snellen), occurring corneal higher-order
Courtesy of AcuFocus
Figure 6. The IC-8 IOL. Figure 7. Intraoperative view of the IC-8 IOL after laser cataract surgery.
s
ocular lens after previous corneal refractive surgery: visual outcomes and
aberrations of 0.6 µm or more or As a result, it is important to spectacle independence. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(9):1150-1154.
after corneal refractive surgery and evaluate pupil size when considering 5. Barnett V, Barsam A, Than J, Srinivasan S. Small-aperture intraocular lens
keratoplasty. the IC-8 lens. combined with secondary piggyback intraocular lens during cataract surgery
after previous radial keratotomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(8):1042-
Patients with diseased corneas, 1045.
keratoconus, or ocular trauma are 1. AcuFocus completes study enrollment for U.S. IDE clinical trial of IC-8
lens. [press release]. Acufocus. June 14, 2019. [Link]
also potential candidates for this com/us/sites/default/files/MKU%20645%20Rev%20A%2C%20
technology. The majority of patients AcuFocus%20Completes%20Study%20Enrollment%20for%20U.S.%20
do well with this lens, but some IDE%20Clinical%20Trial%20of%20IC-8%[Link]. Accessed March H. BURKHARD DICK, MD, PHD, FEBOS-CR
19, 2020.
patients with larger mesopic pupils n D irector and Chairman, University Eye Hospital,
2. Dick HB, Piovella M, Vukich J, et al. Prospective multicenter trial of a
(≥ 6 mm) may experience photic small-aperture intraocular lens in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. Bochum, Germany
phenomena due to light coming 2017;43:956-968. n M ember, CRST Europe Editorial Advisory Board
3. Ang RE. Small-aperture intraocular lens tolerance to induced astigmatism.
around the outside edge of the n b [Link]@[Link]
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:1659-1664.
opaque ring. 4. Agarwal S, Thornell EM. Cataract surgery with a small-aperture intra- n F inancial disclosure: Consultant (AcuFocus)
Courtesy of PhysIOL
PAVEL STODULKA, MD, PHD,
FEBOS-CR
Figure 8. Defocus curve at 1 month postoperative.
ISOPURE 1.2.3
The lens does this by using a unique study of the IsoPure lens. Thus far,
anterior-posterior optical surface 1-month outcomes are available for
profile of increased negative spherical our study population of 19 patients
This EDOF monofocal IOL is less aberration that is fine-tuned for each (38 eyes).
diopter over the entire optic. Optical The mean age of the 12 women and
sensitive to defocus than a bench testing has shown that the seven men in the study was 69.9 years.
optical system of the IsoPure 1.2.3 We aimed for a target of slight myopia
standard aspheric monofocal IOL. is less sensitive to defocus than a in all eyes.
T
standard aspheric monofocal IOL We found no statistically significant
he recently introduced and that it offers a continuous range differences in postoperative refractive
IsoPure 1.2.3 (PhysIOL), based of vision between distance and cylinder at 1 week and 1 month
on isofocal technology, is intermediate at any pupil size. postoperative. In fact, the cylinder
an EDOF IOL that aims to decreased slightly during the first
overcome some of the limitations IN CLINICAL PRACTICE month because the incision for lens
of existing EDOF lenses, including I participated in the first implantation was created on the
unwanted photopic phenomena. multicenter prospective clinical steepest corneal meridian.
As would be expected, monocular These data show that the IsoPure CONCLUSION
UDVA improved significantly from 1.2.3 can provide high-quality UCVA As with any new technology, longer
preoperative: 45% of eyes achieved at both distance and intermediate follow-up in a larger number of eyes
20/20 or better UDVA at 1 month lengths, and our results indicate that is warranted. For now, I look forward
postoperative. CDVA was 20/20 or patients can see well from 77 cm to to using the IsoPure 1.2.3 in many
better in 89% of eyes. Also at 1 month, infinity. more patients to provide them with
monocular UIVA at 80 cm was 20/32 Also at 1 month postoperative, increased depth of focus.
or better in 56% of eyes and 20/40 or the defocus curve (Figure 8) and
better in 83% of eyes. DCIVA at 80 cm contrast sensitivity were as expected.
was 20/32 or better in 56% of eyes That is, the defocus range for visual PAVEL STODULKA, MD, PHD, FEBOS-CR
and 20/40 or better in 81%. DCIVA acuity of at least 20/32 was -1.10 to n C hief Eye Surgeon, CEO, Gemini Eye Clinics,
was also measured at 66 cm, at which 0.70 D, and contrast sensitivity for Czech Republic
distance 35% of eyes achieved 20/32 both photopic and mesopic was n M ember, CRST Europe Editorial Advisory Board
or better and 68% achieved 20/40 or within the normal range for patients in n s todulka@[Link]
S
pectacle independence after
cataract surgery is probably
one of the most frequently
expressed patient desires that
cataract surgeons hear preoperatively.
Many solutions are available, including
a wide range of IOL choices. EDOF
IOLs are among the new categories of
lenses we can offer patients for relief
from presbyopia. Figure 9. During Lucidis T IOL implantation, a manipulator is used in the nondominant hand.
s
removing all dispersive OVD from
about 20° before the target axis, but
we think there is no need to do so
with this lens.
Irrigation and aspiration can be
done while the IOL is aligned in the
target axis (Figure 10). When the I/A
instrument is removed, no rotation
is observed, and the IOL remains
perfectly aligned to the target axis at
the end of surgery (Figure 11).
CONCLUSION
The Lucidis T IOL seems to be
a good choice for patients with
astigmatism who want to benefit
Figure 10. The Lucidis T IOL is aligned to target axis during irrigation and aspiration. from EDOF technology after cataract
surgery. More clinical studies are
needed to show the benefits and
drawbacks of this lens. Our first clinical
impressions are quite enthusiastic. No
patient has complained of halos, and
most patients have good far vision,
often with additional comfort in near
and intermediate vision.
1. Breyer DRH, Kaymak H, Ax T, Kretz FTA, Auffarth GU, Hagen PR. Multifocal
intraocular lenses and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses. Asia Pac J
Ophthalmol (Phila). 2017;6(4):339-349.
2. Gillmann K, Mermoud A. Visual performance, subjective satisfaction and
quality of life effect of a new refractive intraocular lens with central extended
depth of focus. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2019;236(4):384-390.
Figure 11. The IOL remains aligned to the target axis after the I/A instrument is removed at the end of the surgery. ACHRAF LAOUANI, MD
n R esident in training, Ophthalmology Department,
The EDOF technology of the report additional comfort at near and CHU Saint-Pierre and Brugmann Hospital,
Lucidis T IOL uses a 1-mm central intermediate distances after cataract Brussels, Belgium
aspheric zone surrounded by a surgery. Further, with the Lucidis T n A [Link]@[Link]
5-mm refractive ring. The lens is IOL we have not encountered any n F inancial disclosure: None
Courtesy of Hoya
Figure 12. The Nanex multiSert+ preloaded IOL (right) and injection system (left).
NANEX
treatment was previously available but some preloaded systems have
only on the Vivinex platform. large tips that, for me, were not
I
According to the manufacturer, the
n 2019, I had the opportunity to 1.62-mm injector tip of the multiSert+ EASE OF USE
evaluate the Nanex multiSert+ is the world’s smallest nozzle size in The ease of use of both multiSert
preloaded IOL and injection an open-loop preloaded hydrophobic devices is astounding. Preparation
system (Hoya; Figure 12). One IOL system. I believe that the nozzle by the operating assistant is
year previously, I had tested the will allow surgeons to inject the lens straightforward, but it is the feeling for
Vivinex multiSert preloaded IOL through incisions as small as 1.8 mm. the surgeon during insertion in which
and injector system (Hoya) and had this device surpasses others. Due to a
been impressed by the performance AWAY FROM WOUND-ASSISTED dual mechanical design that moves the
of this device. The feeling of control, TECHNIQUE IOL forward, the surgeon experiences
consistency, and ease of use with both After years of wound-assisted IOL total direct tactile control with an
systems were a level above any other injection techniques, I have now effortless forward plunger movement.
system I had used before. converted to a fully through-the-wound The sudden drop-off of force upon
The design and working mechanism technique. This avoids potential issues lens release that occurs with many
of the Nanex multiSert+ system with a wound-assisted technique, injectors does not occur with these.
is identical to that of the Vivinex including the specific skills required for Additionally, the unique ability
multiSert. The difference is the lens successfully using such a technique, to switch between push and screw
material. Although the hydrophobic the possibility of a failed injection, mode allows the surgeon to control
acrylic material of the Vivinex is newer, and, worse, the possibility of a trapped implantation precisely. This is useful
the material of the Nanex IOL is Hoya’s IOL unfolded halfway through the in challenging cases such as eyes with
proven AF-1 hydrophobic acrylic, and incision that cannot move forward narrow pupils and zonular weakness.
the Nanex is the first AF-1 IOL to be nor backward. Because the inserter is fully through
s
the wound, the surgeon can advance the injector is pushed against the eye, maintaining the unprecedented
the plunger slowly without risk of the position of the tip remains stable control and safety of its predecessor,
the IOL unfolding inside the incision, and cannot protrude too far into the the Vivinex multiSert.
making one feel much more in control eye or stretch the wound too much.
and at ease than with other systems.
The versatility of the multiSert CONCLUSION KHIUN F. TJIA, MD
injectors is further enhanced by the From my clinical experience, it is n A nterior segment specialist, Isala Clinics, Zwolle,
reduce induced corneal astigmatism. system. It allows, if desired, the use n F inancial disclosure: Consultant (Beaver-Visitec
This shield also enhances control; when of incisions as small as 1.8 mm while International, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Hoya)
O
distribution of light and takes into images on the retina from infinity
ne recent improvement
in premium IOLs is the
incorporation of a continuous
SEGMENTAL DESIGN
The optic of the Precizon CTF Figure 13. The Precizon CTF provides constant progressive focus between two focal points and smaller amounts of
contains multiple segments and sectors diffused light transmission.
CLINICAL RESULTS
A prospective European multicenter
study of the Precizon enrolled
60 patients who were scheduled for
either cataract surgery or refractive lens
exchange.1 At 3 months postoperative,
80% of patients reported achieving
spectacle independence. Patients also
had good UCVA for near, intermediate,
and distance vision. The majority of
patients had no complaints of halos
or glare at night; about 5% reported a
variety of visual disturbances at night Figure 14. The Precizon CTF is available in two models.
during the first 3 months of follow-up.
1. Holzer M. Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction of the new Precizon
At my center, we enrolled presbyopia correction procedures. presbyopic multifocal intraocular lens. Paper presented at: the European
20 patients in the study. At 3 months With its anterior surface segmental Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons Annual Meeting; October 7-11,
2017; Lisbon, Portugal.
postoperative, 100% of patients were design, the lens provides excellent
within ±0.50 D of sphere target, and far and near vision with a smooth
87.5% were within ±0.50 D of their transition between zones, in essence
cylinder correction target. Further, creating a constant progressive focus TIAGO MONTEIRO, MD, FEBO, FEBOS-CR
37.5% were within ±0.25 D of sphere between focal points. Because the n H ead of the Cornea, Cataract, and Refractive
and 37.5% were within ±0.25 D of Precizon CTF mimics the eye’s natural Surgery Department, Hospital CUF Porto/Hospital
cylinder correction targets. process of accommodation, patients de Braga, Porto, Portugal
should experience only a brief period n E scola de Ciências da Saúde da Universidade do
I
am always keen to add a new • Low incidence of posterior capsular
presbyopia-correcting IOL to my opacification; and
repertoire in the never-ending • For a toric IOL, a wide cylinder range
quest to improve patient and rotational stability.
outcomes and satisfaction. When I was therefore more than happy to
considering a new lens, I look for several participate in a multicenter evaluation
features: of the RayOne Trifocal Toric IOL
• An established manufacturer; (Rayner; Figure 15) prior to its formal
• A lens material with a proven
FRCOphth, CERTLRS
track record; Figures 15 and 16 courtesy of Amir Hamid, BMedSci, BMBS,
• A lens platform already
AMIR HAMID, BMEDSCI, BMBS, demonstrated to be safe and
FRCOPHTH, CERTLRS effective;
• Excellent visual performance;
• An option to have the IOL preloaded;
RAYONE
• A microincision push injector for the
IOL that supports a wound-assisted
s
TABLE. MONOCULAR AND BINOCULAR LOGMAR VISUAL
ACUITY AT DISTANCE, INTERMEDIATE, AND NEAR
Monocular and binocular logMAR distance visual acuities
Visual Acuity Monocular Binocular
UDVA
Mean ±SD 0.04 ±0.10 0.00 ±0.09
Range -0.10 ±0.30 -0.10 ±0.20
UIVA
Mean ±SD 0.01 ±0.05 -0.03 ±0.05
Range -0.10 ±0.10 -0.10 ±0.10
Figure 16. Pre- and postoperative refractive cylinder with the RayOne Trifocal in 20 eyes UNVA
of 10 patients. Mean ±SD 0.09 ±0.12 0.05 ±0.05
Range -0.10 ±0.20 -0.10 ±0.18
global launch at ESCRS Paris 2019. When I was presented with D, diopters; SD, standard deviation; UDVA, uncorrected distance visual acuity;
the specifications of the IOL, I was reassured to see that they UIVA, uncorrected intermediate visual acuity; UNVA, uncorrected near visual acuity
fulfilled all my requirements.
This multicenter pilot study involved five sites and five
surgeons in Germany, the United Kingdom, and Japan. CONCLUSION
Patients with bilateral visually significant cataract and no The RayOne Trifocal Toric IOL is a promising new
ocular comorbidity were enrolled after fully informed entry in the presbyopia-correcting toric IOL category
consent was obtained. After bilateral IOL implantation, the for surgeons. Initial results were excellent, with high
primary endpoints of the study were visual acuity, subjective levels of satisfaction among both patients and surgeons.
refraction, cylinder reduction, and surgeon satisfaction at Additionally, the RayPro digital platform (Rayner) for
3 months postoperative. The results of 20 eyes of 10 patients collecting patient-reported outcomes allows surgeons to
were available for analysis.1 continuously monitor long-term outcomes and satisfaction
among our patients implanted with this and other
RESULTS presbyopia-correcting IOLs.
Figure 16 summarizes the results. All patients were within
1. Barsam A, Butt A, Thomson P. First visual results after implantation of the RayOne trifocal intraocular lens. Poster
±0.50 D and 57% were within ±0.25 D of emmetropia. presented at: the 24th ESCRS Winter Meeting; February 21-23, 2020; Marrakech, Morocco.
Regarding astigmatism correction, 100% of eyes had 0.75 D or
less of astigmatism postoperatively, and 71% had 0.50 D or less.
More important, 90% of patients achieved monocular AMIR HAMID, BMEDSCI, BMBS, FRCOPHTH, CERTLRS
and binocular uncorrected distance, intermediate, and near n C onsultant ophthalmic surgeon and Clinical Lead for Cataract and Refractive
visual acuity of 0.1 logMAR or better (Table). And finally, all Surgery, Optegra Eye Hospital, London
surgeons reported high levels of satisfaction with the lens n A [Link]@[Link]; Twitter @DrAmirHamid
and its injector system. n F inancial disclosure: Consultant (Carl Zeiss Meditec)
T
and cooking and need to be able to see found that the lens reduces spherical
he Tecnis Synergy IOL items on the grocery shelf or in their aberration to near zero in most eyes.
(Johnson & Johnson Vision; kitchen without constantly adjusting Of course, because it has diffractive
Figure 17) was introduced in how far away they are from the objects. optics, the Synergy still has some issues
Europe last year, and since The Synergy is relatively pupil inde- with glare and halos at night, but these
that time I have successfully implanted pendent, and, in my experience, patients photic phenomena are generally well
about 300 of them. Two of my senior report that they can still read in dim tolerated. My patients report that they
optometrists, who have decades of light. In fact, I have heard no complaints are an acceptable trade-off for the
experience and have been involved with about near vision at all. quality and range of vision.
more than 10,000 presbyopia-correcting
IOL cases each, have chosen bilateral DISTANCE AND NIGHT VISION NO TORIC YET
Tecnis Synergy lenses for their own The near-vision gains associated with The only other disadvantage of this
eyes, which I think is a testament to the the Synergy IOL have been achieved lens is that it is currently not available in a
excellence of this lens. without sacrificing the excellent quality toric version. In our refractive clinic, more
than half of patients need correction of
astigmatism, so this limits the number
of patients who are good candidates
for the Synergy lens. If a toric option
becomes available, the Synergy will cer-
tainly be the most frequently implanted
presbyopia-correcting IOL in my clinic.
s
Courtesy of Edoardo Ligabue, MD
maculopathy or glaucoma, and a
good tear film. For a long time, there
wasn’t much problem choosing
the right IOL because most IOLs
were monofocal. They were not
often associated with issues such as
glare, low contrast, and other visual
disturbances.
Now, the AcrySof IQ Vivity IOL
(Alcon; Figure 19) is providing vision Figure 19. The AcrySof IQ Vivity IOL.
like that of a monofocal IOL, with clear
visual acuity at a range of distances, The Vivity does not use diffractive
EDOARDO LIGABUE, MD without the drawbacks of existing or refractive technology to provide
multifocal IOL technologies. This presbyopia correction. Instead, the
innovation provides a newfound lens uses Alcon’s novel X-Wave
VIVITY stability in IOL selection and new
possibilities in visual correction.
technology, which is completely
different from the technologies
used by all other IOLs in the market.
Natural vision at a range of NATURAL VISION The X-Wave technology creates an
distances provided by a novel From my first experience with
the Vivity, its distinguishing features
extended focal range by stretching
and shifting the wavefront, as
optical technology. have been its ease of use and a visual opposed to splitting the wavefront
R
disturbance profile like that of a into multiple focal points as
ecently, the increasing number monofocal IOL. In my experience, diffractive multifocal lenses do.
of advanced-technology IOLs patients with the Vivity have natural By using all available light, this IOL
available for the correction of vision with a continuous extended maintains the same vision quality as
presbyopia and astigmatism focal range from distance to a monofocal IOL: excellent distance
has changed my approach to patient intermediate (66 cm) to functional vision, intermediate sharp vision for
management. In my practice, I need to near; in bright light, they can easily active lifestyles, and good quality vision
understand a patient’s visual needs in read up to J3, and they report high for close-up daily activities (Figure 20).1
order to provide him or her with the satisfaction.
best surgical treatment. The Vivity is pupil-independent CLINICAL EXPERIENCE
Every decision requires consider- and is not affected by angle kappa. The results shown in Figure 20, from
ation of the patient’s ocular health Contrast sensitivity, distance visual the first clinical studies of the AcrySof
status, including the presence of acuity, glare, and night vision quality IQ Vivity, are in line with the results I
regular astigmatism, the absence are comparable to the characteristics have seen with my patients in my first
of pathologic conditions such as of a monofocal IOL. 4 months implanting the Vivity.
A
Courtesy of Alcon
B
Figure 20. Uncorrected vision (A) and visual disturbance (B) results from a prospective, randomized, parallel-group, patient and assessor masked, multisite trial of 107 patients bilaterally
implanted with the AcrySof IQ Vivity IOL and 113 with the AcrySof IQ IOL with 6-month follow-up. AcrySof IQ Vivity Alcon data on file (TDOC-0055576, March 29, 2019).
When I propose a diffractive IOL and it does not impair visual acuity experience to date, the AcrySof IQ
to my patients, I always ask them in patients with maculopathies or Vivity IOL will soon become the first
if they can accept loss of a little bit glaucoma. The lens provides stability in IOL choice for most of my patients. It
of distance visual quality to gain the capsular bag and is tolerant to slight has changed the game by improving
independence from spectacles. But decentration. The Vivity is also available patients’ visual performance, making
when I discuss the Vivity IOL, offering in a toric IOL model, allowing patients my job easier and more relaxing.
excellent distance visual quality with to achieve astigmatism correction at 1. Data on file. Alcon.
occasional spectacle use to read small the time of cataract surgery.
text, the choice is unanimous: Quality
of vision is patients’ chief preference. CONCLUSION EDOARDO LIGABUE, MD
The AcrySof IQ Vivity allows me The Vivity is commercially available n C hief, Ophthalmology Department,
to have no worries about refractive in selected European markets at Centro Diagnostico Italiano,
outcomes. In my experience, it is present. Availability in additional Milan, Italy
forgiving regarding biometric accuracy, countries will follow throughout 2020, n e [Link]@[Link]
it is not sensitive to tear film variations, according to Alcon. Based on my n F inancial disclosure: None
T
IOLs exhibit dual peaks.2 MTF
he ongoing quest for the measurements and retinal image
perfect presbyopia-correcting modeling show that the xact IOL
IOL has led to a series of has a higher tolerance to tilt and
compromises involving the decentration than other EDOF IOLs
trade-offs of multifocal dysphotopsia with at least 40% higher MTF. This Figure 21. The xact Mono-EDOF IOL.
s
“THE XACT MONO-EDOF
IOL IS AN EXCITING
ENTRY IN THE FIELD OF
PRESBYOPIA-CORRECTING
IOLS, PROVIDING QUALITY
OF VISION SIMILAR TO
THAT OF A MONOFOCAL
IOL WITH VISION IN
Figure 22. Defocus curves demonstrate 1.30 D binocular defocus at 20/30 and a broad peak within the range of ±0.50 D
THE INTERMEDIATE
postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (data on file with Santen). RANGE LIKE THAT OF
was 0.33 ±0.16 logMAR (equivalent expect binocular UDVA of 20/20
AN EDOF IOL.”
to 20/40-). or better within the dioptric range
At 9 months, mean monocular of ±0.50 D postoperative manifest —MARK PACKER, MD, FACS, CPI
BCVA improved to -0.05 refraction spherical equivalent.
±0.13 logMAR (20/20+), and Testing with the Halo and Glare
mean monocular UCVA was Simulator (Eyeland Design Network)
1. Packer M. Enhancements after premium IOL cataract surgery: tips, tricks,
0.05 ±0.19 logMAR (20/20-). demonstrated only slight interference and outcomes. In Starr C, ed. Current Ophthalmology Reports. New York:
Monocular DCIVA at 66 cm was from dysphotopsia. Approximately Springer Science + Business Media; 2013.
2. Spalton DJ, Packer M, So Y, Tiwari N, Venkateswaran K. Optical and
0.21 ±0.11 logMAR (20/30-), and 75% of patients reported little clinical comparison of a novel monofocal extended-depth-of-focus IOL and a
monocular UIVA at 66 cm was difficulty driving at night. Contrast conventional bifocal extended-depth-of-focus IOL. Paper presented at: ASCRS
Annual Meeting; May 4, 2019; San Diego, CA.
0.18 ±0.13 logMAR (20/30+). sensitivity measured within the 3. Spalton DJ, So Y, Tiwari N, Venkateswaran K. The effect of tilt and decentra-
With binocular testing, DCIVA was expected range for monofocal IOLs. tion on a novel extended-depth-of-focus IOL compared to conventional
extended-depth-of-focus IOLs. Paper presented at: ASCRS Annual Meeting;
logMAR 0.09 ±0.13, and UIVA was May 4, 2019; San Diego, CA.
logMAR 0.08 ±0.10 (20/25+). CONCLUSION 4. Weindler J, Baur I, Son HS, et al. Prospektive klinische Studie mit einer neuen
monofokalen Intraokularlinse mit erweiterter Tiefenschärfe. Paper presented
Monocular and binocular defocus The xact Mono-EDOF IOL is at: Kongress der DGII; February 13, 2020; Mainz, Germany.
curves are shown in Figure 22. Binocular an exciting entry in the field of
depth of focus at 20/30 is estimated to presbyopia-correcting IOLs, providing
be 1.30 D. Of note, the defocus peak quality of vision similar to that of MARK PACKER, MD, FACS, CPI
demonstrates a broad area within the a monofocal IOL with vision in the n P resident, Packer Research Associates
range of ±0.50 D where visual acuity intermediate range like that of an n m ark@[Link];
is better than 20/20, suggesting a EDOF IOL. Early clinical results suggest Twitter @mpackermd
relatively forgiving tolerance to normal that this lens will be a valuable n F inancial disclosure: Advisor (Advanced Vision
variations in the accuracy of IOL power addition to cataract surgeons’ Science [Santen], Alcon, Amaros Medical,
calculation. One would therefore repertoire of lenses. n Aquea Health, Bausch + Lomb, Cassini
Technologies, ClearSight, International Biomedical