PAYAD V.
TOLENTINO
GR NO. 42258
SEPTEMBER 5, 1936
Facts:
The will was prepared by Attorney Marciano Almario on
September 7, 1933, in his own handwriting, in Spanish, and
in the house of the Leoncia Tolentino, the testator.
The will disposes her properties to Victorio Payad in
compensation for his diligent and faithful services to
Leoncia.
It was later read to her in the presence of Pedro, Jose,
Perfecto and others who were then present. The testator
approved all the contents and requested Atty. Almario to
write her name.
Facts:
Atty. Almario proceeded to write the name of the testator on
the three pages composing the will. With the assistance of
Atty. Almario, the testator placed her thumbmark between
her name and surname.
Atty. Almario later on signed the three pages consisting the
will in the presence of the testator and the witness in the
same circumstances.
During probate proceedings, the Court denied probate on
the ground that the attestation clause does not state that the
testator requested Atty. Almario to write her name.
Issue:
Is the will valid?
Ruling:
Yes. It is not necessary that the attestation clause should
state that the testator requested Atty. Almario to sign her
name because the attorney did not sign for the testator.
The testator signed by placing her thumbmark. A statute
requiring a will to be signed is satisfied if the signature is
made by the testator’s mark.
Leocia was only assisted by Atty. Almario in placing her
thumbmark on each and every page of the will and the said
attorney merely wrote her name to indicate the place where
she placed said thumbmark.