A position paper on Legalizing Euthanasia in the Philippines
By: Victor Rudolf B. Malpas
According to the Article II, section 11, Philippine constitution, “Euthanasia” is defined as
“the termination of Human life by painless means for the purpose of ending physical
suffering” It is a form of suicide and violates the constitutional policy that the state valued the
dignity of other numan person, in healthcare, a significant question arises: should we legalize
euthanasia?. This paper will discuss why legalizing euthanasia in the Philippines shouldn’t
happen, considering medical and Humanitarian aspects.
Euthanasia, an act of ending a person’s life voluntarily should’nt be legalized in the
Philippines, first, while I respect diverse opinions on euthanasia, my stance aligns with the
belief that legalizing euthanasia in the Philippines might pose significant challenges.
Secondly, the primary focus should revolve around preserving and cherishing life. Though
the concept of a dignified death holds importance, concerns about potential misuse, ethical
implications, and the intrinsic value of life cannot be overlooked.
Looking at countries where euthanasia is legal, such as the Netherlands, Belgium, Canada,
and Colombia, documented challenges emerge. For instance, instances of involuntary
euthanasia and a lack of stringent oversight raise valid concerns about the potential risks
associated with legalization. Moreover, religious perspectives, such as the Catholic
viewpoint, condemn the act of deliberately ending another individual’s life, emphasizing the
sanctity of human life and the belief that humans lack the authority to take a life. (Fr. Place,
1992)
Reflecting on challenges faced in regions that legalized euthanasia, Doctors like Dr. Ira
Byock found a strong case against it. Instead, they emphasize the necessity for improved end-
of-life care and comprehensive support services. Upholding the principles of the Hippocratic
Oath, which underscores the preservation of life, medical professionals, including
organizations like the Philippine Medical Association, express reservations about legalizing
euthanasia, emphasizing their ethical responsibilities.
In the end, the paper argues against legalizing euthanasia in the Philippines, pointing out
misuse and ethical problems. Examining issues in legalized nations and using on medical
knowledge, the focus should move to improving end-of-life care and support services.
Maintaining ethical obligations and the Hippocratic Oath principles is critical, with a focus on
compassionate care for people nearing the end of their life.