CA 2 Notes
CA 2 Notes
NON-INSTITUTIONAL CORRECTION
Compiled by Tessie B. Nanglihan
2nd Sem. SY 2021-2022
Course Description: The course focuses on Presidential Decree No. 968, otherwise
known as the “The Probation Law of 1976” as amended, establishing a probation
system in the Philippines, its historical background, philosophy, concepts and
operation as a new correctional system, investigation, selection and condition of
probation, distinction between incarceration, parole, probation and other forms
of executive clemency, total involvement of probation in the administration of
the Criminal Justice System.
This course also treats the study of Act No. 4103, as amended otherwise
known as the “Indeterminate Sentence Law” that created the Board of Pardon
and Parole”.
Objectives: At the end of the course, the students should be able to:
1. Explain fully the basic concepts, principles and philosophy of the probation
system.
2. Describe the relationship of the probation administration with the other
pillars of the criminal justice system.
3. Recommend or provide solutions on problems involving probation
investigation and supervision.
4. Discuss the operations of probation in the country
5. Apply learned concepts in their everyday life.
Course Outline:
1. Historical background of probation.
2. Probation law and other forms of probation in the Philippines.
3. Parole investigation and supervision.
4. Executive clemency.
1
d) Amnesty – an official pardon for people/group of prisoners who have been
convicted of political offenses, admit the crime or give up their weapons
and return to civilian life without being punish.
-
PROBATION: HOW GRANTED/INSTITUTED
1. Before Sentence – through recommendation from PAO, NPS affecting
immediate release of detaineees through bail or recognizance.
2. After Sentence
a) Probation – under the youth probation, PD No. 603, suspends the
sentence of offenders with age ranging from 9 years old to 18 years
old and place them under the supervision of the DSWD. Under RA No.
9344, age 15 years old and below – no criminal responsibility. In PD
968 – suspension
b) Parole
Punishment among ancient people was prompt and pitiless. Criminals were
feared, therefore hated and consequently tortured, banished, or killed with no
concern whatever. Later in the law of Babylon, Greece and Rome, while severe,
sought to maintain balance of justice by introducing compensation, a precursor
of our use of fines and restitutions, for those crimes which did not affect the safety
of the state. Slaves having nothing of value to offer as compensation, received
unmitigating cruel punishment. In Greece, they were broken on the wheel, in
Rome, if guilty of theft, they were thrown into the Tarpesian Rock, Jewish Law
revealed some consideration for law breakers in lesser penalties for unplanned
murder. They also provided for those who killed without premeditation, which is a
sanctuary called “cities of refuge” or houses of refuge where the accused was
safe pending an investigation of his criminal responsibility.
Houses of Refuge – are large fortress-like congregate style institution located in
urban areas for youth offenders. The New York houses of refuge became the first
movement in what was later became the juvenile justice system.
2
HISTORY OF PROBATION
ENGLAND
During the reign of King Henry II in the 13th century, clergy offenders were
brought to his court and the offenders were counseled by the bishops and
chaplains – Benefit of the Clergy.
Judicial Reprieve was another device for modifying sentence. This was
used by the early English judges. Reprieve is the withdrawing of a sentence for an
interval of time, whereby execution is suspended if the judge is not satisfied with
the verdict, or the evidence is suspicious.
This practice grew up at a time when new trials or appeals to another court
were impossible under the common law of England. Early in the 17th century, with
the establishment of settlements in America, English courts began to grant
reprieve to prisoner under sentence death on conditions that they accept
transportation.
Another method is recognizance. This was used in England in the 14th
century. Another method is “bind over for good behavior”. It originated as
measure of preventive justice, involving an obligation or promise, sworn to under
court order by a person not yet convicted but though likely from the information
before the court to commit crime that he would keep the peace and be of good
behavior. Sureties or bail were usually required, and the person who stood surety
had the power and the duty enforce the condition and return the offender to
court if he committed an offense during the specified period or failed to comply
with other conditions of his release. The method of assuring good behavior was
extended at an early date to persons charged with or convicted of
misdemeanors, and was used in addition to or substitution for other punishment.
It was specifically applied by English Criminal Law consolidation act of 1861 to
persons convicted of any felony not capital, and was further regulated under the
summary jurisdiction act of 1879. This led to the government of the first British
Probation Service.
FORERUNNER OF PROBATION:
1. Benefit of the clergy
2. Judicial reprieve
3
3. Recognizance
4. Transportation\banishment
5. Bind over for good behavior
6. Sureties/bail
On April 26, 1878 – the first probation local law was enacted by the
LEGISLATURE of MASSACHUSETTS which was based on the works of John Augustus
because it gave benefits to the state financially. The law was signed by Governor
Alexander B. Rice on April 26, 1878 which authorized the government to employ
probation officers for adult offenders and it provided for the appointment and
prescribed the duties of a salaried or paid probation officers for the court of Suffolk
Country. EDWARD H. SAVAGE an ex-chief of police of Boston, was named
probation officer, thus becoming the 1st probation officer employed by the
government or first paid probation officer in 1891. Probation spread throughout
the USA. The VERMONT STATE – was the second to enact the real probation law in
1898 and first to adopt the country plan. RHODE ISLAND – was the third who enact
probation. Each country court was required to appoint a probation officer whose
duty was to make investigation of the accused persons at the request of the
court. The probation officers were required to make monthly report on their work
to Board of Prison Commissioners.
In 1899, Minnesota & Illinois enacted laws giving probation service to
children only. The 4th state to pass general probation law was New Jersey in 1900.
New York was the 5th to provide adult probation law. California was the 6th state
to enact adult probation and juvenile court laws in 1903. Connecticut & Michigan
also enacted probation in 1903.
In 1913 HUBER LAW, a United States law in Winconsin permitting prisoners not
so dangerous to society to be gainfully employed during the day while residing in
4
jail. Probation officer shall notify all police agencies by sending a note – FLASH
SHEET, that probationer is under his supervision.
SURSIS (1888-1891) – A unique probation method was introduced in France
& Belgium which provided a probation with no supervision on the condition that
no further offense will be committed within a prescribed period.
FOUNDERS OF PROBATION:
1. John Augustus – a shoemaker in Boston Massachusetts. Father of probation
in Boston
2. Matthew Davenport Hill – an English lawyer who had introduced the
practice of suspending sentence & releasing the offender under
supervision in Birmingham, England.Father of probation in England.
3. Teodulo C. Natividad – co-sponsored house bill no. 393 entitled “AN Act
Establishing Probation in the Philippines: providing officers therefore and for
other purposes.” The father of probation in the Philippines.
Adult probation law was twice attempted in the Philippines, 1st on August
7, 1935 Act No. 4221 was enacted creating a probation office under the
Department of Justice, led by the American Governor General with the advice &
consent of the US Senate. This law provided probation for first time offender 18
years of age & over convicted of certain crimes.
2nd In 1966, HOUSE BILL NO. 393 Sponsored by then Congressman TEODULO
C. NATIVIDAD and RAMON BAGATSING tried to revive the Probation System but
did not pass Congress & was pending in senate when martial law proclaimed,
instead PD 603 was enacted.
PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO. 603, otherwise known as the CHILD AND YOUTH
WELFARE CODE was passed to avail, PROBATION TO MINOR OFFENDERS. It
amended Article 80 of the Revised Penal Code by raising the age of minority to
under 21 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense.
5
During the Martial Law, Commissioner Teodulo C. Natividad of the
NAPOLCOM and some personnel of this agency, sitting en banc and headed by
the defense Secretary Juan Ponce Enrile, now Senator drafted a report entitled “
Meeting the Challenge of Crime.” This served as the turning point for the Inter-
Disciplinary Committee ( IDC) on Crime Prevention of the Commission to draft
adult probation decree, headed by Commissioner Teodulo C. Natividad. The
draft was presented and reviewed at a seminar on the Probation System
sponsored by the National Police Commission and the UP Law Center on April 24,
1976, attended by 800 participants. The participants composed of Jurist,
Penologists, Policeman, Educators, Civil Leaders, Social Behavioral Scientists,
Media Men, Blue and White Collar Workers, Students and Housewives. Two foreign
experts participated namely: Dr. Torsten Erickson, former United Nations Inter-
Regional Adviser on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice, and Dr. A. Lamonth
Smith, Director for research program, planning and evaluation, Department of
Correction of Arizona.
After many hearing & extensive consultations the draft decree was
presented to a group of 369 jurist, penologist, civic leaders & social and
behavioral scientist & practitioners. These practitioners overwhelmingly endorsed
the establishment of an Adult Probation System in the country.
It was on this last day of the conference on Crime Control which was held
at Camp Aguinaldo that the president FERDINAND E. MARCOS signed PD 968,
otherwise known as the ADULT PROBATION LAW OF 1976 under the DOJ into law.
Teodulo C. Natividad became the first probation administrator.
On November 23, 1989 the New Administrative Code of 1987 through E.O.
292 transferred the function of supervising parole and pardoned officers from trial
courts to the Probation Administration. The code also change the name of the
agency to Parole and Probation Administration(PPA) in order to reflect the
changed made by said law. In 1991, the PPA was assigned the new tasked of
conducting pre-parole and executive clemency investigations in all city &
provincial jails and preparing pre-parole reports for the board of pardon & parole.
6
on crime prevention & treatment of offender saw which was signed by his
Excellency President Ferdinand Marcos on July 24, 1976.
Teodulo C. Natividad died in 1998, is considered as the “Father of Probation
in the Philippines”.
(MIDTERM)
PD 968 – The Probation Law of 1976 otherwise known as the Adult Probation Law.
- signed into law July 24, 1976
- the term probation was coined by John Augustus from ther Latin word
Probare which means to prove or to test.
January 3, 1978 – Probation started to operate (2 years & 4 months after sighning
the law).
PD NO 968
SECTION 1. Title & Scope of the Decree
This decree shall be known as the Adult Probation Law of 1976. It shall be
apply to all offenders except those who are entitled to the benefits under the
provisions of PD 603. The term probation was coined by John Augustus from the
Latin word “probare” which means to prove or to test.
SECTION 2. PURPOSE
a. To promote the correction & rehabilitation of nan offender by
providing him with individualized (personalized) community based
treatment.
7
b. To provide an opportunity for his reformation & reintegration into the
community.
c. To prevent the commission of offense.
Contents of PSI:
a. The circumstances surrounding the offense for which the petitioner was
connected.
b. Psychosocial information regarding the probationer.
8
c. Evaluation of the petitioner’s suitability for probation and his potential for
future social adjustment and reintegration to the community.
d. A recommendation to either grant or deny probation.
9
a. Present himself to the probation officer designated to undertake his
supervision at such place as may be specified in order within 72 hours
from receipt of said order.
b. Report to the probation officer at least once a month.
Purpose of Supervision:
10
1. To carry out the conditions sethforth in the probation order.
2. To ascertain whether the probationer is following said condition.
3. To bring about the rehabilitation of the probationer.
4. To ascertain the re-integration of the probationer to the community.
11
SECTION 18.PROBATION ADMINISTRATION
There is hereby created under the DOJ an agency to be known as the
probation administration herein referred to as the Administration, which shall
exercise general supervision over all probationers.
The Administration shall have staff, operating units & personnel for the
proper execution of the functions.
The administrator shall receive an annual salary of at least 40,000, its powers
& duties are:
a. Act as the executive officer of the administration
b. Exercise supervision & control over all probation officers.
c. Make annual reports to the secretary of justice concerning the operation,
administration & improvement of the probation system
d. Promulgate the necessary rules relative to the methods & procedures of the
probation process
e. Recommend to the secretary of justice the appointment of subordinate
personnel of his administration.
f. Generally, perform such duties & exercise such powers as may be
necessary or incidental to achieve the objectives of this decree.
12
He shall whenever necessary be assisted by an assistant regional probation
officer who shall also be appointed by the president upon the recommendation
of the secretary of justice with an annual salary of at least 20,000.
13
achieving maximum efficiency & economy in the operations of the probation
system.
Work Sheet – preliminary form filled up by nthe probationer within 72 hours after
the release of his probation order.
BENEFIT OF PROBATION:
1. Probation protects society
• From excessive cost of detention
• From the high rate of recidivism of detained offenders
2. Probation protects the victim
• It provides restitutions –the act of restoring what was taken away
14
• It preserve justice
3. Probation protects the family
• It does not deprive the wife & children of husband & father
• It maintains the unity of the home.
4. Probation assist the government
• It reduces the population of prisons & jails
• It reduces the clogging of court
• It lightens the load of prosecutors
• It sustain the law enforcement
5. Probation helps the offender
• It maintains the earning power
• It provide rehabilitation in the community
• It restores his dignity
6. Probation justify the philosophy of men that:
• Life is sacred
• All men deserve a second chance
• Society has a moral obligation to lift the fallen.
ADVANTAGES OF PROBATION
1. Probation prevents crime by offering freedom & aids offenders while
undergoing treatment & rehabilitation in the community.
2. It conforms with the modern humanistic trends in penology.
3. It protects society by placing under close supervision non-dangerous
offender while undergoing treatment & rehabilitation in the community.
4. It prevent youthful or first time offenders from turning into hardened
criminals.
5. It is a measure of cutting enormous expense in maintaining jails
6. Ir reduce recidivism & over crowding in jails or prisons.
7. It reduces the burden of the jail force & institutions of guarding detainees.
8. It gives the first & light offenders a second chance in life & provide an
opportunity for the reformation of a penitentt offender.
9. It makes offender productive, a tax payer instead of tax eater.
10. It restores the successful probationer his civil rights.
11. It has been proven to be effective in developing countries that have
adopted it.
12. It is advocated by the United Nations in its various congress in crime
prevention & treatment of offenders.
(FINAL)
15
- Parole in the Philippines is governed by Act No.4103 otherwise known as The
Indeterminate Sentence Law. Lately, other changes was introduced by
E.O. No. 292.
- Amended by R.A No. 4225 & R.A. No. 4203
GOALS OF PPA
1. Promote the reformation of criminal offenders & reduce the incidence of
recidivism.
2. Provide a cheaper alternative to the institutional confinement of first time
offenders who are likely to respond to individualized, community-based
treatment programs.
FUNCTIONS OF PPA
1. To administer the parole and probation system.
2. To exercise supervision over parolees, pardonees and probationers.
3. To promote the correction and rehabilitation of criminal offenders.
4. To provide the Board of Pardons and Parole with necessary & relevant
information that can be used in determining a prisoner’s fitness for parole
or any form of executive clemency.
5. To provide the DDB with pertinent information and prudent
recommendations for the determination of first time minor drug offenders
to be placed on suspended sentence.
6. To provide the court with relevant information and judicious
recommendation for selection of offenders to be placed on probation.
7. To make use of innovative, financially and technically feasible projects to
uplift the moral, spiritual and economic condition of probationers, parolees,
pardonees and first time minor drug offenders by utilizing available
community resources .
16
BPP is a quasi-judicial body which was created under Act No. 4103 that
grants parole to any prisoner who is qualified to enjoy its benefits.
PAROLE came from the French word “Parole de honore” “Parole d’ Honeur”
which means word of honor.
- The process of suspending the sentence of a convict after having served
the minimum of his sentence without granting him pardon and describing
the term upon which the sentence shall be suspended.(Cirilio Tradio).
- It is a procedure which prisoners are selected for release and a service by
which they are provided with the necessary controls, assistance and
guidance as they served the remainder of their sentence in the free
community.(Charter & Wilkins)
- It is a form of conditional release that is granted after a prisoner has served
a portion of his sentence in a correctional institution. (Barnes & Tellers).
- It is a decision by an authority constituted accordingly by statute to
determine the portion of the sentence, which the inmate can complete
outside of the institution. It is the status of serving the remainder of the
sentence of a convict in the community in accordance with the rules &
regulations by the Board of Parole.(Correctional & Parole Administration)
➢ Parole is not a reward per se for good behavior but rather it is a follow
up of his institutional program.
➢ Parole is not claimed as a right but it is granted by the Board as a
Privilege to qualified prisoner.
Avantages of Parole
1. Parole provides a transitional period between institutional life and the
freedom of normal life in the community.
2. Parole permits an administrative agency to decide when an offender
should be released.
3. Parle reduces the period of institutionalization.
4. Parole makes it possible to release an offender at the time when he is
mentally and emotionally to return to the community.
5. Parole officer can overtly influence for the prevention of delinquency and
crime.
6. Parolees have the opportunity to support themselves and their dependents
and to make restitution to the victims of their crimes.
7. It cost less to keep an offender on parole than to maintain him on a
correctional institution.
17
1. Looks into the physic cal, mental and moral records of those who are
eligible for parole or any form of executive clemency & determines the
proper time of release of such prisoner on parole.
2. Assist in the full rehabilitation of individuals on parole or those under
conditional pardon with parole conditions by way of parole supervision.
3. Recommends to the president of the Philippines the grant of any form of
executive clemency to prisoners other than those entitle to parole.
18
➢ Client – refers to a parolee/pardonee who is placed under supervision of a
probation & parole officer.
➢ Release Document – refers to the conditional pardon/absolute pardon
issued by the president of the Philippines to a prisoner or to the “discharge
on parole” issued by the board.
➢ Parole Supervision – refers to the supervision/surveillance by a probation &
parole officer of a parolee/pardonee.
➢ Summary Report – refers to the final report submitted by the probation &
parole officer on his supervision of a parolee/pardonee as basis for the
latter’s final release and discharge.
➢ Progress Report – refers to the report submitted by the probation & parole
officer on the conduct of the parolee/pardonee while under supervision.
➢ Infraction Report – refers to the report submitted by the probation & parole
officer on violations committed by a parolee/pardonee of the conditions
of his release on parole or conditional pardon while under supervision.
➢ Flopped – inmate slang for failing to meet the parole board standards for
release. A flop usually means that the inmate will not be eligible to be
considered anew by the board until another 6 months or more
incarceration, treatment or observation in the institution.
➢ Community agencies – a formal group or association organized to promote
social or individual welfare.
19
Diliman, Quezon City
20
However, regardless of the crime committed, a petition for executive
clemency/parole may be referred for a pre-parole/executive clemency
investigation to a probation and parole officer who shall submit a report on
the behavior, character antecedents, mental & physical condition of the
petitioner within 30 days from receipt of referral, to include the results of the
NBI records check.
GRANT OF PAROLE: When the board finds that there is a reasonable probability
that if released, he will be law-abiding & that his release will not be incompatible
with the interest & welfare of society.
21
10. Those whose conviction is on appeal.
11. Those who have pending criminal cases.
BOARD ACTION
A majority of the members of the Board, constituting a quorum, shall be
necessary to recommend the grant of executive clemency or to grant parole; to
modify any of the terms and conditions appearing in a release document; to
order the arrest and recommitment of a parolee/pardonee; and to issue
certificate of final release and discharge of a parolee/pardonee. The minutes of
the meeting of the Board shall show the votes of its individual members and the
reason/s for opinion to grant or deny parole shall be reduced in writing and shall
form part of the records of the proceedings.
22
The Board may recommend the grant of executive clemency or grant
parole to a prisoner who is an alien. In such a case, the alien who is released on
the parole or pardon shall be referred to the Bureau of Immigration for disposition,
documentation and appropriate action.
PAROLE SUPERVISION
After release from confinement, a client shall be placed under the
supervision of Probation and Parole Officer so that the former may be guided and
assisted towards rehabilitation.
The period of parole supervision shall extend up to the expiration of the
maximum sentence which should appear in the Release Document, subject to
the provision of Section 6 of Act No. 4103 with respect to the early grant of Final
Release and Discharge.
INITIAL REPORT
Within the period prescribed in his Release Document, the prisoner shall
present himself to the Probation and Parole Officer specified in the Release
Document for provision. If within forty five (45) days from the date of release from
prison or jail, the parolee/ pardonee concerned still fails to report, the Probation
and Parole Officer shall inform the Board of such failure, for appropriate action.
ARRIVAL REPORT
The Probation and Parole Officer concerned shall inform the board thru the
Technical Service, Parole and Probation Administration the date the client
reported for supervision not later than fifteen (15) working days therefrom
TRANSFER OF RESIDENCE
A client may not transfer from the place of the residence designated in his
release document without the prior written approval of the Regional Director
subject to the confirmation of board.
OUTSIDE TRAVEL
23
A chief Probation and Parole Officer may authorize a client to travel outside
his area of operational jurisdiction for a period of not more than thirty (30) days. A
travel for more than 30 days shall be approved by the Regional Director. The
travel of probationer should be filed 15 days before the date of travel for approval
of the court.
DEATH OF CLIENT
If a client dies during supervision, the provision and parole officer shall
immediately transmit a certified true copy of the client’s death certificate to the
board recommending the closing of the case. However, in the absence of a
death certificate an affidavit narrating the circumstances of the fact of death
from the barangay chairman for any authorized officer or any immediate relative
where client re sided, shall suffice.
PROGRESS REPORT
When a parolee/ pardonee commits another offense during the period of
his parole surveillance, and the case filed against him has not yet been decided
by the court, a progress report should be submitted by the Provision and Parole
Officer to the Board.
INFRACTION REPORT
Any violation of the term condition appearing in his release Document or
any serious deviation or non- observance of the obligations set forth in the parole
supervision program shall be immediately reported by his probation and parole
officer to the Board. The report shall be called infraction report when the client
has been subsequently convicted of another crime.
ARREST OF CLIENT
Upon receipt of an Infraction Report, the Board may order the arrest or
recommitment of the client.
24
TERMINATION OF PAROLE AND CONDITIONAL PARDON SUPERVITION
REPEALING CLAUSE
All existing rules regulation and resolution of the board which are
inconsistent with these rules are hereby repealed or amended accordingly.
PROGRAMS OF PAROLEES
1. Furloughs – are authorized, unescorted leaves from confinements granted
for specific purpose and for designated periods, usually 24to 72 hours,
25
although they may be long as several weeks or as short as few hours. This is
to assist the offender in becoming re-integrated into the society.
2. Work Release – refers to any program that provides for the labor of jail or
prison inmates in the community under limited supervision, and where
inmates are paid the prevailing wage. Sometimes furloughs and work
release are used interchangeably.
3. Shock Parole or shock probation – refers to a planned sentenced where
judges’ order offenders imprisoned for statutory incarceration period
related to their conviction offense. However, after 30, 60, 90 or even 120
days of incarceration, offenders are taken out of jail or prison and
“resentenced” to probation provided that that they behave well while
incarcerated.
4. Half-Way Houses - one of the most important components of community-
based corrections. It is privately or publicly operated facilities staffed by
professionals, paraprofessionals and volunteers. They are designed to assist
parolees to make the transition from prisons to community.
5. Intensive Supervision Programs – this involves more frequent contact
between offenders and their supervising officers as well as greater number
of restrictions than typically characterize regular probation. Generally, the
intensive supervision programs target criminals who have committed
serious crimes.
6. Electronic Monitoring - unlike incarceration, which totally eliminates
offender’s freedom, electronic monitoring restricts freedom while
permitting offenders to remain in the community. House confinement is
commonly a condition of electronic monitoring is very often the reverse
situation is the case, and that is the EM is a condition of home confinement.
7. Correctional Boot Camp – in theory, correctional boot camps emanate
from fundamentally different, although not mutually exclusive, correctional
philosophies. Most programs are based on the concept of deterrence and
rehabilitation. Correctional boot camps attempts to instill discipline and
respect for authority from among the participants.
1. DISCRETIONARY RELEASE
It is the parole of an intimate from prison to the expiration of maximum
sentence according to the boundaries set by the sentence and the
legislature. Discretionary release usually functions under the indeterminate
sentence, and implies that the inmate is ready to undergo community-
based treatment and supervision.
2. Mandatory Release
It is the required release of an inmate form incarceration because law
mandates the release of any inmate having served the equivalent of the
maximum term. Mandatory release means the parole board refused to
release the inmate prior to attainment of the equivalent of maximum time
of sentence imposed by the court.
3. Expiration Release
It is when the prisoner has served the full length of his or her sentence. Minus
good conduct time allowance. Expiration release is ordered, and
26
community supervision is not correctional supervision and cannot be
returned to prison for their current offense.
PARDON
Objectives:
1. To know how pardon started.
2. To know how pardon is being applied and granted.
3. To know the benefits and/or effects of pardon.
HISTORY OF PARDON
The exercise of the pardoning power has always been vested in the hands
of the executive branch of the government, whether King, Queen, President or
Governor. Pardon dates back to the pre-Christian era. In fact the bible contains
an allusion where a criminal was released and pardoned out by the King where
Christ was crucified.
In England, pardon developed out of the conflict between the King and
the Nobles who threatened his powers. Pardon was applied to member of the
Royal Family who committed crimes, and occasionally to those convicted of
offences against the royal power. It was the general view that the pardoning
power was the exclusive prerogative of the King. In England today, the power to
extend parson is vested in the Queen upon advised of the Minister of Home Affairs.
In the United States, Pardon among the early American colonist was a
carry-over of the English practice. The pardoning power was exercised by the
27
Royal Governor through the power delegated by the King. After the Declaration
of Independence, the Federal and State Constitutions vested the pardoning
power on the President of the United States and the Governor federal state cases,
respectively.
Kinds of Pardon
As practice in the local setting, there are two kinds of pardon, as follows:
1. Absolute Pardon
It is a pardon that releases the wrongdoer from punishment and restores
the offender’s civil rights without qualification. Absolute pardon is one given
without any condition attached to it. It is generally granted to convicts who
had long sentences, exempting them from serving the remainder of their
sentence. It is also termed full pardon or unconditional pardon.
2. Conditional Pardon
It is a pardon does not become effective until the wrongdoer satisfied a
prerequisite or that will be revoked upon serves the purpose of releasing,
through executive clemency, a prisoner who is already reformed or
rehabilitated, but who cannot be paroled because the law does apply to
him.
EFFECTS OF PARDON:
1. A pardon does not restore the right to hold public office or the right of
suffrage, except when such right is expressly restored by the terms of
pardon.
2. It does not exempt the culprit from payment of indemnity.
28
Can the Offended Party grant Pardon?
YES, the offended party can grant pardon.
Distinction of Pardon by the Offended Party and Pardon granted by the President:
1. Pardon granted by the Chief Executive extinguishes the criminal liability of
the offender but not in pardon granted by the offended party.
2. Pardon granted by the Chief Executive does not include civil liability which
the offender must pay while pardon granted by the offended party can
waive the civil liability which the offender must pay.
3. Pardon granted by the offended party should be given before the
prosecution of the criminal action, whereas pardon granted by the Chief
Executive may be extended to any of the offenders after conviction.
29
The probation system aims to prevent the commission of further offenses by offering rehabilitative measures in a community setting rather than incarceration, thereby reducing criminal behavior through structured support and oversight . By imposing specific behavioral conditions and supervision, probation helps offenders adjust law-abiding habits . Successful reintegration into society and reduction in offenses can be noted through probation's focus on personalized treatment and community-based support, lessening the negative impact of institutionalization . However, its effectiveness can vary based on the resources available, the severity of conditions imposed, and the probationer’s personal circumstances .
Probation is a court-ordered correctional supervision in the community, granted directly as an alternative to incarceration, and involves conditions that the offender must adhere to while still being under the court's oversight through a probation officer . Parole, on the other hand, is a conditional release from incarceration after serving part of the sentence, governed by an administrative agency like the Board of Pardons and Parole, which assesses when an offender is ready to re-enter society . While probation aims at providing individualized community-based treatment and reformation of offenders prior to incarceration, parole focuses on reintegrating offenders after partial term completion in an institution .
Probation officers play a critical role in the rehabilitation and reintegration of probationers by supervising and ensuring adherence to court-imposed conditions, providing guidance, and offering assistance to facilitate the offender’s reintegration into the community . They conduct post-sentence investigation reports that influence probation decisions and continually monitor compliance with probation terms . By working closely with probationers, probation officers help maintain public safety and promote the offender's personal development, ultimately aiding in reducing recidivism .
The Board of Pardons and Parole recommends executive clemency by reviewing prisoners' records, considering parole when appropriate, and recommending clemency to the president. Decision-making requires a majority agreement among the board members, reflecting diverse perspectives and comprehensive evaluation . The board’s decisions are influenced by the collective reasoning of its members, documented in detail for transparency. This process ensures decisions are made judiciously, taking into account rehabilitative progress and risk assessments associated with the applicant .
The period of probation varies based on the original sentence: up to 2 years for sentences of imprisonment not exceeding 1 year, and no more than 6 years for sentences exceeding 1 year. If the sentence is only a fine, probation can be up to twice the number of subsidiary imprisonment days . This allows the legal system to balance the need for accountability with rehabilitation opportunities, specifically tailoring the time under supervision to match the severity of the offense, while encouraging reform .
Granting parole facilitates the early release of offenders, reducing overcrowding and costs associated with prolonged incarceration while allowing prisoners to reintegrate into society under supervision . Economically, it is less costly than institutional confinement and enables parolees to contribute to the economy, aiding their financial independence . Socially, it assists in the reformation process, with parole officers guiding and supervising the reintegration journey, thereby potentially reducing recidivism as parolees adjust more effectively to societal norms . The balance between community safety and reintegration is a key consideration of the parole system .
A conditional pardon partially exempts an offender from the punishment within specific limits or under certain conditions, resulting in partial extinction of criminal liability, whereas an absolute pardon completely eliminates the offender's criminal liability and restores civil and political rights . An absolute pardon signifies total forgiveness of the offense thus nullifying the consequences of conviction, while a conditional pardon requires compliance with particular terms . Both forms influence the offender’s legal status significantly but vary in the extent of post-conviction relief granted .
When a probationer violates the conditions of probation, the court may issue a warrant for arrest. Upon arrest, the probationer undergoes a hearing to assess the violation, which can result in revocation . If probation is revoked, the probationer is required to serve the original sentence imposed, effectively terminating the leniency previously granted . This strict enforceability maintains discipline and underscores the requirement for compliance, while also offering due process through hearings .
The court can modify the conditions or period of probation upon application by the probationer or probation officer, allowing for adjustments that might benefit the probationer's rehabilitation while maintaining public safety . This process includes notifying both parties and potentially a hearing to ensure both the probationer and supervisor can present their views . This flexibility helps tailor probation to the unique needs of each case, yet maintains control, as the court retains ultimate oversight .
Probation records, including investigation reports and supervision history, are confidential and can only be disclosed to the probation administration or concerned court, ensuring the privacy of those involved . This confidentiality is critical to protect the probationer’s privacy and encourage honest reporting to probation officers, which aids in creating effective rehabilitation strategies. It also limits public dissemination that could stigmatize or unfairly influence the probation process . Exceptions allowing review by the probationer or attorney are permitted when it serves the probationer’s best interest .