Cheng Spacebetweenlocating 2010
Cheng Spacebetweenlocating 2010
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
[Link]
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@[Link].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
[Link]
is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ars Orientalis
Abstract
Several late sixth-century stone items of tomb furniture unearthed over the past
decade in north China have reconfirmed the role of the Silk Road in facilitating
exchange between China and regions to its west. Scholars have identified motifs in
the decoration of these tomb elements and linked them to Chinese or Zoroastrian
buried in these tombs or their ancestors likely hailed from Sogdiana, other features
of the objects defy clear interpretation according to artistic paradigms in either
north China or Central Asia. The tombs also demonstrate a range of affinities with
the traditions of both regions and challenge our assumptions about culture and the
coherency of traditions in the context of exchange.
This essay takes a broad view of these stone objects and examines the occu?
pants, tomb contexts, and the diverse representations on the tomb furniture as a
collective group. Drawing together biographic, iconographic, and archaeological
evidence, together with relevant iconography from examples in museum collec?
tions, I reconsider the methods by which these pieces have been examined and
demonstrate the varied relationships their occupants had to Central Asia and the
local communities they inhabited. I reorient the focus away from distinct markers
of one culture or another toward the larger picture that characterizes the com?
plex identities of individuals in late sixth-century north China. I posit a thematic
rationale for iconographic choices that transcend affiliation with one region or
another and argue that while specific elements may demonstrate affinities with
extant traditions, taken as a whole the general diversity of artistic elements and
burial practices suggests that these individuals occupied a space between paradig?
matic "cultures."
81
Glass bottle, probably Roman, first they passed, and the circumstances, such as trade, war, or diplomatic lar
to third century ce, excavated in led to their fate buried in the tombs of the medieval elite in China.
Luoyang, Henan. Luoyang Museum.
After James C. Y. Watt et al., eds.,
On one level, these items are the literal products of exchange, taken
China: Dawn of a Golden Age (Newplace to another we remain relatively comfortable in our ability to pinpo
place
York: The Metropolitan Museum of of production ? a space in which they are likely to have been m
Art, 2004), 113
or a context in which a motif held a particular meaning to the viewers f
was likely created. On another level, they act as catalysts for subsequent
2 as agents waiting to be transposed or recast via iconographic, formal, or
Silver ewer, fifth to sixth century, means into another guise. One or more of these various elements may fin
Tokharistan (ancient Bactria), sion in syncretic visions by artisans who borrow them from disparate lo
excavated from the tomb of Li Xian
temporal frameworks and introduce them into new contexts, as is the ca
(d. 569) and his wife Wu Hui (d. 547),
silver ewer found in the sixth-century tomb of Li Xian (Fig. 2). In this s
Guyuan, Ningxia. Guyuan Museum.
After Juliano and Lerner, Monks and instinct may be to trace the process of a motif or shape's alteration, or
Merchants, 98 lous routes of transmutation. This approach is, however, prone to be lim
dearth of evidence that can clearly map key points of change, or challen
improbability of knowing whether the imagery or form was inspired by
knowledge or a portable depiction, or was the product of an imaginative
tion, or even misinterpretation. For instance, while the shape of Li's ewe
of Sasanian metalwork, with fluted and beaded decoration, the division o
into large and small registers and the human head on the handle dist
vessel from contemporary Sasanian products.1 Even more startling ar
the ewer that appear to narrate the story of the Judgment of Paris. Ren
artisan unfamiliar with key iconographic details, a scene in which Paris a
depart for Troy lacks a ship, leaving Helen's right foot awkwardly dangl
82 BONNIE CHENG
84 BONNIE CHENG
decade of the twenty-first century; other items were dispersed to museums earlier
in the twentieth century, and extensive study has been hindered by their unusual
iconography. The following is a list of the items of particular interest to this study,
in chronological order:9
86 BONNIE CHENG
We do not know the tomb occupants connected to all of these stone furnishings.
In cases where the occupants are identified by epitaphs found in the graves, I have
underlined their names (surname first) as they will be referenced in this article.
The marble couch in the Miho collection was looted and sold on the antiquities
market, and the piece from Yidu and the couch from Anyang were unearthed early
on from their original contexts and lack excavation reports. These pieces are con?
nected to Sogdians based on iconographic similarities.
This tomb furniture dates roughly to the last half of the sixth century and half
the examples were found in the region around Chang'an. The rest were found fur?
ther east at sites in the Central Plains region. Decorated using a variety of tech?
niques, they take one of three general forms: a coffin (guan ftO constructed of six
stone panels (e.g., Fig. 4); a house-shaped sarcophagus or "stone chamber" (guo
or tangl^t) made of multiple slabs (e.g., Fig. 5); or an open platform "couch" or
funerary bed (chuang or ta ff}) surrounded on three sides by decorated panels
(e.g., Fig. 6). The enclosed sarcophagi of Wirkak and Yu Hong each consist of a low
platform with a decorated front facade and four walls with painted or low-relief
imagery on the interior or exterior, and a sloping stone roof. Beams, brackets, and
the roof were rendered in stone on Wirkak's sarcophagus, and modeled after tim?
ber-frame construction, giving it the appearance of an aboveground dwelling; and
four stone pillars inserted into bases supported the roof that extended out in front
of Yu Hong's sarcophagus. The couches of Kang Ye and An Jia are not dissimilar to
the sarcophagi, with a low platform and decorated base, but remain open struc?
tures, with vertical panels lining the back and two sides of the platform. Low, tower?
like sculptures frame the front edge of a few of these pieces (e.g., the Miho couch),
acting as a gateway to the platform on which corpses have been found.
The majority of these stone couches and chambers are diverse in their assem?
blage of images, lack identifiable narrative orientations, and vary in their manner
of representation. The present discussion will focus largely on the four excavated
pieces from Chang'an, belonging to Li Dan, Kang Ye, Wirkak, and An Jia, with com
88 BONNIE CHENG
7
Scenes from the An Jia couch. After A more sequential arrangement of scenes is found carved in low relief on three
Shaanxi sheng kaogu yanjiusuo, Xi'an
sides of Wirkak's sarcophagus. Beginning on the west wall and continuing to the
Bei Zhou An Jia mu, fig. 37
north and east walls, ten scenes appear to chart Wirkak's life from his youth, hunt?
ing and traveling amidst caravans and attendants, to his passage over the Cinwad
bridge and ascension into the afterlife (see Fig. 13). Several scenes, including one
on the west wall that appears out of this sequence, contain deities or figures whose
identities are still unknown. The front facade has a massive doorway flanked by
two guardian figures in high relief. The right and left edges of this front facade are
divided into three tiers that roughly mirror each other: at the top, a cluster of musi?
cians play Central Asian instruments (e.g., the pipa), in the middle, two figures
flank a large carved window with slats, and, at the bottom, a fire altar tended by
a half-man, half-bird magus or priest-bird. Additional figural and animal details
decorate the base of this sarcophagus
In lieu of a separate epitaph found in the other excavated tombs, an inscrip?
tion was mounted above the doorway on the front facade of Wirkak's sarcophagus.
The only dual Chinese-Sogdian inscription from these tombs, the texts narrate
Wirkak's Central Asian ties and his official posts, and conclude with the dedication
of the stone sarcophagus (shitang lit. "stone chamber") by his sons in the
hopes that Wirkak and his wife would find eternal peace in the afterlife.17 The pro?
claimed eschatological wishes accord with the scenes of ascension into the afterlife,
but such a sequential narrative does not clearly exist on any of the other couches or
coffins listed here, though they may be organized according to a different pictorial
logic. Even more remarkable, such pictorial representations are virtually unknown
in Central Asia, despite vivid textual descriptions that narrate the fate of the soul
according to Zoroastrian beliefs.
The remaining examples have variations on these general iconographic themes,
with further variations in height, technique, and material distinguishing the funer?
ary furnishings. Despite structural differences, the Miho couch and Yu Hong
sarcophagus share strong Central Asian iconography and style, and were both dec?
orated in low-relief on marble slabs bounded by a scrolling decorative border. As
on the An Jia couch, a host of Central Asian peoples occupy these scenes of hunting,
tribute, and banqueting. A few distinct scenes, which have garnered much scholarly
attention, will be discussed below.
90 BONNIE CHENG
Sogdian Traces
Sogdians, the people primarily responsible for mercantile activities along the Silk
Road's network of settlements, were characterized as itinerants without a bounded
nation. Sogdian trade caravans that traversed the Silk Road could be enormous in
size. Official histories record entourages, led by sabaos, of over two hundred mer?
chants with six hundred camels carrying over ten thousand bolts of silk.23 The
sabao, a term that appears in Chinese sources until the mid-Tang, is believed to
have been a high-ranking post for foreigners, but scholars do not agree on its pre?
cise scope. One view argues for a secular interpretation of the post, that sabaos were
political leaders in Iranian Central Asian communities, but that another lower
ranking office, the xianzheng (|^IE) or xianzhu was responsible for reli?
gious matters.24 Another interpretation, offered by Luo Feng and Antonino Forte,
regards it as a religious post, but also one that involved matters of trade.25 Jiang
Boqin's discussion highlights the notion that the role existed during a period of tol?
erance and was accorded special status by the government of the Northern Dynas?
ties which lasted into the Tang. He argues that the sabao was responsible not only
for tribute expeditions that came into China, but also for large settlements of the
descendants of earlier Sogdian traders. While scholars disagree on the religious or
92 BONNIE CHENG
9
Fire altar above doorway leading into secular nature of the office, they nonetheless concur that the person who held this
An Jia tomb. After Shaanxi sheng
post was a member of the aristocracy in Sogdian society, or someone who owned
kaogu yanjiusuo, Xi'an Bei Zhou An
more than one hundred servants. It is also clear that sabao derives from a term for
Jia muy fig. 15
a merchant leader, which indicated the head of a caravan of several hundred mer?
chants.26 Epitaphs from the graves discussed here link about half of the individuals
interred within them to this high-ranking Sogdian post; the remaining individuals
either lacked an epitaph or remain unidentified.
The Sogdian religion was an indigenous development of ancient Iranian reli?
gious traditions, influenced not only by "orthodox" Zoroastrianism as developed
in Sasanian Persia, but also by Hinduism, Manichaeism, and Christianity. The Sog?
dian homeland nurtured a robust tradition of religious architecture and monu?
mental painting.27 Sogdian religion and its visual culture often unified Sogdians
where political or geographic boundaries did not, so it is no wonder that one of
the strongest commonalities linking the tombs and therefore the deceased within
them are the motifs that reference this religion. Representations of the Cinwad
Bridge and native deities on Wirkak's sarcophagus (Fig. 13), or a funerary ritual on
the Miho couch (Fig. 12), allude directly to Sogdian beliefs and practices from the
perspective of both the deceased and mourners.28 The affiliation with Sogdiana on
other stone funerary furniture varies in degree from the explicit depiction of Zoro
astrian deities and scenes to more abbreviated versions of motifs that make a more
Figure of the goddess Nana, Miho the lintel of the doorway leading into An Jia's tomb (Fig. 9). The altars are in some
couch. After Juliano and Lerner,
instances tended by a half-human, half-animal "magus" or "priest-bird" whose
Monks and Merchants, 309, fig. J
mouth is concealed by a pad?m (mouth cover) so its breath will not pollute the
sacred fire (see Fig. 12). But while An Jia, Wirkak, and Yu Hongs funerary structures
11
include additional Central Asian and Zoroastrian iconography, the fire altar incised
Unidentifiable deity, west wall, on Li Dan's coffin and a similar-looking motif on Kang Ye's couch are the only ref?
Wirkak sarcophagus. After Wenwu
erences to Zoroastrianism in their tombs. No priest-bird tends the altar in these
(2005),no.3, fig. 33
representations, and other features incised on the structures mute the allusion to
Zoroastrianism. We will return to these two examples below.
Scholars have been able to identify specific deities that explicitly reference Zoro?
astrianism post-mortem beliefs in a few scenes found on some of these structures.
The four-armed Nana is depicted on one of the rear panels of the Miho couch (Fig.
10); while a more tenuously identified Weshparkar appears at the top of the east
wall of Wirkak's sarcophagus (see Fig. 13).29 The majority of these otherworldly
figures, however, remain either unidentified or the subject of unresolved debates
(Fig. 11). Despite our inability to identify them precisely, their larger size, position
in the upper tiers of the compositions, and the fact that they are flanked by winged
figures, framed by a mandorla, or sit on a lotus base?all conventional modes of
presenting Buddhist deities?support the speculation that they are sacred figures.
More conclusive arguments have been made for the identification of two other
scenes on the Miho couch and Wirkak's sarcophagus. Their iconography is cor?
roborated by Central Asian textual and visual sources, and in their representation
94 BONNIE CHENG
12
Funerary ritual (detail), Miho couch. of mourning and the imagined post-mortem journey of the soul they draw more
[Link]
specific links to Zoroastrian practices. The first scene, on the Miho couch, depicts
imgbig/[Link]
a priest who wears zpad?m and tends a fire (Fig. 12). Four of nine figures behind
him kneel and hold knives up to their faces; others meditate below in a landscape
alcove of sorts. Several scholars have discussed this composition, identifying it as
a Zoroastrian funeral ceremony, following the exposure of the corpse to be con?
sumed by animals and linking the presence of a dog to the sagdid rite, in which the
glance of the dog is believed to drive away evil or defiled spirits. Frantz Grenet notes
that despite the fact that the practice of face cutting is condemned in Zoroastrian
texts it is frequently depicted on Central Asian ossuaries. This detail is further cor?
roborated by murals such as those at Panjikent.30 The second scene, which spans
two panels on the east wall of Wirkak's sarcophagus, presents a host of figures and
animals crossing the Cinwad Bridge over hell (Fig. 13), identified by the heads of
monsters capping the pillars of the bridge and among torrential waves below. Other
details of the scene depicted here, two dogs and flames found at the lower right
edge, are interpreted as guardians of the bridge and the fires that aid the soul to
cross it. Grenet and others have identified the two larger figures at the front of the
party on the upper left of the scene as Wirkak and his wife, and the rocks above
them, which divide the human realm from the deities above, as the "mountain over
which the soul ascends."31
Within these scenes scholars have noted iconographic deviations from visual
conventions in Central Asia, writing that "many details (are) executed roughly
or wrongly" because Chinese artisans were less familiar with the imagery, per?
haps only given limited instruction by their Sogdian patrons. The domed pavil?
ion found in scenes from the An Jia, Yu Hong, and Miho pieces (see Figs. 7 and
17), for instance, is "characteristic of Sogdian architecture according to the Chinese
imagination. However, its details are not Sogdian but combine different, mostly
Buddhist elements."32 This recalls the Bactrian artisan's incomplete depiction of the
Greek myth on Li Xian's ewer, but it is less certain how knowledge of an original
architectural model might have been transmitted and adapted to these stone carv
96 BONNIE CHENG
In discussions of the function of these pieces, most scholars recognize that the
adoption of Chinese burial traditions by elite Sogdians followed the growing set?
tlements of their people in the Guanzhong and Central Plains regions; but some
scholars have focused on continuities between their stone funerary furniture and
Zoroastrian practices; others have concentrated on Sogdian acculturation. The for?
mer argue that the stone structures naturally took the place of depositing bones in
ossuaries (ast?d?n), the normal Sogdian aristocratic practice in Transoxiana. They
have compared stone couch-beds and house-shaped sarcophagi, neither of which
are explicitly described in medieval Chinese sources, to dakmas (exposure plat?
forms), citing the importance of Zoroastrian proscriptions against the inhumation
of the body for fear of polluting the earth.37 The Persian word dakma (derived from
Avestan daxma) has come to have a more restricted meaning?towers dedicated to
the exposure of corpses for carrion birds to consume ? but in antiquity could refer
to a wide variety of funerary furniture and architecture.38 Carved from the living
rock, or built from stone and lime specifically because they are less porous materi?
als, exposure platforms prevented impurities from the corpse entering the ground
while carrion birds removed the most ritually polluting element, the flesh.39 If the
deceased had disposable income, after the bones were exposed his family members
might deposit them in an ossuary (especially popular in Sogdiana) or a rock-hewn
tomb (popular in Persia, modern Iran); however, the final deposition of the bones
was not religiously mandated and the less well-to-do might simply leave them on
the exposure platform.40 What was of the utmost importance, however, was that
no flesh should come in contact with any of the holy elements of earth, water, or
fire. Although the stone funerary furniture unearthed in north China would have
prevented this, a fact that could have facilitated the Sogdians' acceptance of this
type of funerary architecture, there is otherwise no evidence of continuity with
Zoroastrian treatment of human remains in these burials beyond allusions to these
beliefs in their imagery. None of the excavated corpses of the Sogdians under dis?
cussion here appear to have been exposed to the elements, but many of the graves
were disrupted so the corpses were found in varying states. Yu Hong's skeleton was
in pieces, scattered in the sarcophagus, under the base, and elsewhere in the tomb
98 BONNIE CHENG
14
Incised dragon and fire altar, Li Dan While scholars concur that Zoroastrian worship existed in China well before
coffin. After Guojia wenwu ju, 2005
the eighth and ninth centuries (but was propagated orally), evidence of the extent
Zhongguo zhongyao kaogu faxian, 126
of religious and cultural exchange with local traditions remains dependent upon
extensive examination of material culture such as these stone funerary furnishings.
Textual and archaeological documents remain vague as to the extent of settlements
contemporary with the Sogdian tombs, but two centuries later, Zoroastrian tem?
ples constructed in four or five wards of eighth-century Chang an attest that the
religion and its community of believers had grown sizable by the Tang.45
stone and imagery of the four directional animals on side panels, at times includ?
ing large winged immortals astride tigers or dragons and smaller musicians amidst
cloud-filled mountainous landscapes. Figures carved on early sixth-century Chi
15
Figures in Chinese attire, Kang Ye nese funerary furniture and Buddhist caves were similarly rendered in flowing
couch (line drawing of incised stone).
robes with ribbons trailing in the wind. These images were either executed with
After Wenwu (2008), no. 6, fig. 8
fine, incised lines, or using a distinctive technique in which the background was cut
away and the primary motifs left flat but seemingly in shallow relief.47
Scholars such as Jiang Boqin also draw strong connections between the con?
struction of the Sogdian funerary furnishings and earlier furniture or architecture
found in China, noting that each type ? coffin, couch, and sarcophagus ? has
precedents from the fifth and sixth centuries. Besides the link to Luoyang coffins,
the shape of the stone couches resembles the platforms found in late fifth-century
pictorial representations (see Fig. 18), and the sarcophagi are not unlike stone
chambers from the same era, although with greater technical variation.48 Based on
current archaeological knowledge, these structural forms continued to be used in
tombs of Chinese in early sixth-century Luoyang, but in the later sixth century they
largely appear in the tombs of Sogdians.
It is the iconographic representations on Kang Ye's couch, seen against his Cen?
tral Asian ancestry, that assert a glaring contradiction that is worth further consid?
eration. Groups of figures roaming leisurely in verdant landscapes, the ox-drawn
cart, and the riderless horse are familiar compositions featured among stone carv?
ings from early sixth-century Luoyang, alongside scenes recounting paragons of
filial piety.49 The moral iconography of filial paragons is absent from the late sixth
century tomb furniture of Sogdians, but the incised technique, limestone, and ico?
nography of mythical animals and transport demonstrate a stronger association
to China, depite the tomb occupants' Central Asian ancestry. The extent to which
these examples of tombs and their occupants adopted "Chinese" elements has been
interpreted as evidence of varying degrees of acculturation. Certainly the dress and
hairstyles seen in figural representations are not the trousers, boots, and heads
16
Ox-cart (left), KangYe (center), carves worn by Central Asians as seen on the funerary furniture of other Sogdians,
caparisoned horse (right), Kang Ye
but the long, flowing robes and stiff caps of north Chinese officials (Fig. 15). The
couch (line drawing of incised stone).
accoutrements of attendants and the trees and details of the lush landscape settings
After Wenwu (2008), no. 6, fig. 29
also align with those found in representations of gardens and architecture on the
Luoyang stone coffins.
The "foreign" element on Kang's couch in fact asserts a curious shift to repre?
senting a new type of foreigner, one associated not with geography but with a lower
social status. Figures of a kind described by archaeologists as foreigners, hu ren (
A) are not representations of Kang but of groomsmen and servants who appear in
only three of ten scenes: the two with the ox-drawn cart and riderless horse and the
scene between them (Fig. 16). In this central scene, a large figure sits on an elevated
curtained platform (in front of decorated panels much like the stone slabs on which
they are depicted) with a traditional Chinese-style hip and gable roof. Because he is
the largest and only figure represented frontally in all of the compositions, scholars
have drawn the reasonable conclusion that this is Kang Ye. The other eight figures
in the scene are all Central Asian men: a pair of wine-bearing attendants to each
side, and a group of four more kneeling below bearing more food and wine. The
use of foreign groomsmen seen in the two flanking scenes is not unprecedented
in Chinese representations, but in the earlier Northern Wei stone coffin tradition,
from which the imagery of Kang's funeral couch is adapted, groomsmen are not
distinguished by such clear foreign physiognomic features as a large nose and large
eyes, but dressed like other Chinese attendants. This element of the decoration on
Kang's couch appears to be an updated late sixth-century feature.
The visual pairing of ox-cart and horse alludes to forms of elite transport in
both north and south China and forms the core of lavish murals of processions
of the later sixth-century. The aristocratic practice of riding in horse-drawn carts
Aristocratic Pursuits
Whereas the diverse imagery and structural variations of these funerary furnish?
ings reveal a range of affiliations with Sogdiana and China, the theme of aristo?
cratic pursuits unifies much of the general iconography. Some of the most striking
17
17
Banquet scene, Miho couch. After positional structure?a platform with food and drink, attendants, musicians,
Juliano and Lerner, Monks and
and sometimes dancers ? can be found on both carved stone objects and painted
MerchantSj29$
murals in China.
These types of aristocratic pursuit, like the representations of elite forms of
transport discussed earlier, suggest an important link between the traditions of
Central Asia and those of north China and a plausible rationale for the conjoin?
ing of artistic practices in the tombs of elite Sogdians. Rong notes that in addition
to iconography more commonly seen in temple imagery in Central Asia, subjects
such as hunting, rites, and banquets were added to Sogdian burials in north China,
but that in some circumstances their meaning was altered.59 The varying degree to
which imagery alludes to Zoroastrian practices obscures the strict religious iden?
tities Sogdian inhabitants transmitted to late sixth-century north China, but the
depiction of shared pursuits?banquets, audiences, hunting?draws deliberate
parallels between the social identities and practices of elite Chinese and Sogdians.
The imagery of Wirkak's sarcophagus may narrate his passage over the Cinwad
Bridge and contain representations of specific deities, but one still finds hunting
and banqueting scenes that gesture to his elevated status. Scenes of face-cutting or
the Cinwad Bridge suggest a direct relationship to Zoroastrian funerary rituals and
beliefs, but representations of fire altars appear subdued next to the dragon and
tiger that dominate Li Dans coffin. And they are barely perceptible amidst scenes
of leisurely pursuits of men and women with entourages, outfitted in the flowing
robes of Chinese elite officials, and the trope of the ox-drawn cart and horse. This
pair of images, a marker of an aristocratic lifestyle and found on the Miho, An Jia
"Intercultural" Paradigms
Theoretical debates about intercultural exchange have proliferated alongside
modern studies of globalization and its after-effects and in postcolonial critiques
of power. Interest in these power dynamics prompted earlier theorists to examine
larger social systems and their role in cultural transformations.60 They, in turn, have
subsequently been criticized for depicting individual agents as powerless and inef?
fective in bringing about any form of social transformation. These theorists largely
engage the contemporary global scene, and such abstractions may be inappro?
priate as analytical strategies for eras that were nowhere near as extensive in their
contacts. Nonetheless, the nomenclature used to couch discussions of premodern
cultural exchange has shifted alongside these contemporary debates. Terms such
as "influence" or "evolution," previously used to explain changes, have given way
to less hierarchical expressions such as "transformation" and "accommodation" in
analyses of how people outside an empire came to live within it and rule it, e.g., the
Goths in Roman territory, or the Tuoba-Xianbei who moved into north China in
early medieval times.61 Thus, attention to these discussions, particularly regarding
how the topic of exchange can be productively reframed, is useful for our investiga?
tion of the circumstances of Sogdian and Chinese interaction.
Despite widespread acceptance of medieval Chinas political and cultural com?
plexity, first and foremost with regard to the Xianbei and Chinese conflicts in north
China, scholars continue to interpret features of the stone funerary furnishings as
separate components of the overall historical picture. The tendency is to character?
ize them according to discernible parallels, noting visual or structural similarities;
to consider them as alterations of borrowed or adapted motifs; or to speak of them
simply as "hybridized" or "syncretic" forms. If we proceed along either of these
lines of inquiry, we arrive at one of two conclusions: that all art is intercultural and
derived from some preexisting idea or form, or, more rigidly, that very few visual
traditions or cultures can truly be characterized by hybridity. Yet these interpreta?
tions also shift between perspectives that focus on isolated iconographic features
of the objects or on the biographic and religious affiliations of their owners. Terms
such as "hybrid," "syncretic," "transformation," or "accommodation" characterize
separate components of the larger picture of exchange. The first two refer to the
objects themselves, while the latter two allude to the agent or process of change.
20
Audience and encampment scenes, If we separate the imagery from these fascinating stone structures into
An Jia couch (line drawing of carved cultural strands and view them as embodying the tension between distinct
and painted stone). After Shaanxi
tions, we may overlook the process of exchange and innovation taking
sheng kaogu yanjiusuo, XVan Bei
Zhou An Jia mu, fig. 24 and pi. 57
may also miss the self-image that An was constructing through this a
of disparate elements in relation to the plurality of cultural repertoire
to him and his descendants during the late sixth century. Rather tha
fying him as the inheritor of one "coherent" culture or another, we may
instead as exposed to an increasingly diverse set of cultural variables. Ans
as a merchant or intermediary between diverse groups is highlighted by t
tional aspect. Adopting this view of identity and of these funerary furnis
produced relationally, from a network of artistic forms, acknowledges the
figuration of traditions in late sixth-century north China as an act of orig
It further reveals An's role as a facilitator between the disparate groups w
he had contact rather than as a member of one group or another. It is a vi
allows us to see individuals occupying a space situated in the colliding netw
late sixth-century north China, affiliating with multiple cultural spheres,
accurately portrays their place in a space between.
The author is grateful to Matthew Canepa, Xian fufu mu fajue jianbao," Wenwu
the editors of Ars Orientalis, and the anony?(1985), no. 11:1-20.
mous reader for their helpful suggestions3 Li Xian's ewer was likely produced in
and comments, and also to Yang Junkai andBactria: Juliano and Lerner, Monks and
Zhang Jianlin in Xi'an and Zhang Qingjie Merchants,
in 99-100.
4
Taiyuan for generously allowing me to seeThe modern Chinese term for these items,
zangju (fpji), refers collectively to large
some of the excavated stone objects. A grant
from the American Council of Learned Soci?tomb furniture.
eties and the National Endowment for the
5 The Northern Zhou finally succeeded in
Humanities allowed me to travel to Xi'an inconquering the Northern Qi, based at Ye,
2007 to see some of these pieces. The authorinis577, only to have the throne seized by
indebted to these institutions for their gener?
Yang Jian four years later. Yang's newly
ous support. founded Sui dynasty then proceeded to
conquer the Chen dynasty and reunify
1 See Jessica Rawson, "Central Asian Silver north and south for the first time in
and Its Influence on Chinese Ceramics," centuries. The specific political context
Bulletin of the Asia Institute 5 (1991): will be outlined below.
139-51; and eadem, The Ornament on Chi? 6 E.g., Luo Feng in Juliano and Lerner,
nese Silver of the Tang Dynasty, British Monks and Merchants, 244.
Museum Occasional Paper 40 (London: 7 See Rong Xinjiang, "Sute Xianjiao meishu
British Museum, 1982). For an example of dong chuan guocheng zhong de zhuan
an Iranian silver vessel found in a tomb, hua-cong Sute dao Zhongguo" in Wu
and an entry point into the foundational Hung, ed., Between Han and Tang:
literature, see Prudence O. Harper, "An Cultural and Artistic Interaction in a
Iranian Silver Vessel in the Tomb of Feng Transformative Period (Beijing: Cultural
Hutu," Bulletin of the Asia Institute 4 Relics Publishing House, 2001), 51-67,
(1990): 51-59. For the larger phenomenon also collected in his Zhonggu Zhongguo yu
of importation and incorporation of wailai wenming (Beijing: Sanlian shudian,
Sasanian luxury goods into Chinese visual 2001), 301-25.
culture, see the article by Matthew Canepa, 8 This paradigm will be discussed below
"Distant Displays of Power: Understand? but stems from Jean-Francois Bayart, The
ing Cross-Cultural Interaction among the Illusion ofCultural Identity (Chicago:
Elites of Rome, Sasanian Iran, and Sui University of Chicago Press, 2005).
Tang China," in this volume. 9 References to specific stone material
2 For an iconographic study, see Annette (limestone, granite, marble) are derived
Juliano and Judith Lerner, eds., Monks and from the excavation reports. The "marble"
Merchants: Silk Road Treasures from used for the Yu Hong and Miho museum
Northwest China, Gansu andNingxia, examples is a soft, creamy white marble
4th-yth Century (New York: Harry N. (/H ? 3l ) common to the Shanxi region
Abrams and Asia Society, 2001), 99-100, and used also for Buddhist sculptures.
particularly the detail in fig. 31c; and Luo Additionally, pigment on some examples
Feng, Hu Han zhijian (Wenwu chuban (e.g., the sarcophagi of Wirkak and Yu
she, 2004), 79-99. The original report is Hong) suggests they were also painted but
published by Ningxia Huizu zizhiqu to what extent is no longer discernible.
bowuguan and Ningxia Guyuan There is an extensive range of sources on
Bowuguan, "Ningxia Guyuan Bei Zhou Li these structures by scholars of varying
culture, as does Rong Xinjiang's excellent 16 Shanxi sheng kaogu yanj iusuo, ed., siecle (Paris: Musee Guimet, 2004).
Zhonggu zhongguo yu wailai wenming Taiyuan Sui Yu Hong mu (Beijing: Wenwu 20 See Shanxi sheng kaogu yanjiusuo,
(Beijing: Sanlian shudian, 2001). See also chubanshe, 2005). Taiyuan Sui Yu Hong mu, 49-85,
the very useful review of this and Etienne 17 On these inscriptions, which are largely particularly 55-60 and figs. 87-93. The
de la Vaissiere, Histoire des marchands identical in content, see Sun Fuxi, tomb containing the Tianshui couch also
Sogdiens (Paris: Institut des Hautes "Investigations on the Chinese Version of contained figurines of musicians (see
Etudes Chinoises, 2002) by Valerie the Sino-Sogdian Bilingual Inscription of note 19).
Hansen, "New Work on the Sogdians, the the Tomb of Lord Shi," in Vaissiere and 21 Shaanxi sheng kaogu yanjiusuo, Xi'an Bei
Most Important Traders on the Silk Road, Trombert, Les Sogdiens en Chine, 47-55; Zhou An Jia raw, 16.
a.D. 500-1000," T'oungPao 89 (2003): and Yutaka Yoshida, "The Sogdian Version 22 Kang occupied a post described on his
149-161. Vaissiere's study has been of the New Xi'an Inscription," ibid., epitaph as datianzhu (y^^i?) that is not
translated by James Ward as Sogdian Trad? 57-72. listed in textual sources, but which
ers: A History (Leiden: Brill, 2005). Since 18 See Shaanxi sheng wenwu guanli archaeologists relate to a three-tier
my interest lies in considering these weiyuanhui, "Shaanxi sheng Sanyuan Sogdian rank akin to a prince or leader of
tombs as a group rather than a compre? xian Shuangsheng cun Sui Li He mu a community and to the xianzhu (|^j?);
hensive discussion of each, I list here only qingli jianbao," Wenwu (1966), no. see note 24. The precise relationship
the primary reports and major studies of 1:27-42; Shaanxi sheng kaogu yanj iusuo, between this post and the datianzhu
the individual examples. "Shaanxi Tongguan Shuicun Sui dai bihua remains unclear. See Wenwu (2008), no.
10 A report on the Li Dan coffin is not yet mu xianke shiguan," Wenwu yu kaogu 6:34.
available, but see Guojiawenwuju, ed.,2005 (2008), no. 3:33-47; and Li Ming, 23 See the entry on the Tuyuhun ()
Zhongguo zhongyao kaogufaxian (Beijing: "Tongguan Shuicun Sui dai bihua mu in Zhou shu (History of the Zhou), juan
Wenwu chubanshe, 2006), 123 - 28. shiguan tuxian shidu," ibid., 48-52. 50:913, which records that in 553 ce, Shi
11 Xi'an shi wenwu baohu kaogusuo, "Xi'an 19 See Tianshui shi bowuguan, "Tianshui Ning $$fl Governor of Liangzhou W^fW
Bei Zhou Kang Ye mu fajue jianbao," shi faxian Sui Tang pingfeng shi (Wuwei jgclK or Guzang "seized an
Wenwu (2008), no. 6:14-35. guanchuang mu," Kaogu (1992), no.i:46 illegal caravan consisting of 240 mer?
12 See Xia Mingcai, Wenwu (1985), no. 54; and Juliano and Lerner, Monks and chants, 600 camels, and 10,000 rolls of
10:49-54; Wenwu (2001), no. 5:92-93; and Merchants, 304-308. Additional examples, multicolored silks."
the study by Zheng Yan, "Qingshou Bei Qi such as a couch displayed at the Musee 24 Jiang Boqin, "Sabaofu zhidu lunlue: Han
huaxiangshi yu ru Hua Sute ren mei Guimet in 2004-5 and a piece that wen Sute ren muzhi kaoshi zhi yi," Huaxia
shu?Yu Hong mu deng kaogu xin faxian resembled Kang Yes couch discovered 3 (1998) (synopsis in Chinese Archaeologi?
de qishi," in Wu Hung, Between Han and near Zhengzhou in 2007 offer further cal and Art Digest [CAAD], 2000,
Tang,73-io6. examples but thus far lack extensive 207 - 208). The term xianzheng or xianzhu
presides over religious sacrifices. Michael Stausberg (Leiden: Brill, 2004), Sogdian funerary pieces coincides with
25 Luo Feng, "Sabao: yi ge Tang chao weiyi 389-401. the Northern Zhou court's persecution of
wailai guanzhi de zai kaocha," Tangyanjiu 29 Grenet discusses Zoroastrian deities and Buddhism launched in 569 ce. Grenet
4 (1998): 215-50 (trans. CAAD, 2000, themes on Wirkak's sarcophagus in links this with his argument that no
165-91); Antonio Forte, "Iranians in Grenet, "Religious Diversity among explicit Buddhist motifs are to be found
China: Buddhism, Zoroastrianism, and Sogdian Merchants," 473-74. The link to amongst the iconography. See Grenet,
Bureaus of Commerce," Cahiers Weshparkar derives from the tiny trident "Religious Diversity among Sogdian
d'Extreme Asien (1999-2000): 285-89. held by the figure on the upper east wall, Merchants," particularly 478.
26 The term derives from either the Sanksrit and the base formed by three oxen that 34 Since the panels of the Miho couch were
or Sogdian sarthavaha or sarthavak. draws a connection to Mithra, known not scientifically excavated, it remains a
27 Frantz Grenet, "Religious Diversity for having slain a bull, although the possibility that they were assembled from
among Sogdian Merchants in Sixth deity is generally depicted with three disparate pieces.
Century China: Buddhism, Manichaeism, heads. Nicholas Sims-Williams, "Some 35 The Chinese inscription refers to the
and Hinduism," Comparative Studies of Reflections on Zoroastrianism in structure as a stone chamber or hall (see
South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 27, Sogdiana and Bactria," in Realms of the above, p. 89) but the Sogdian term
no. 2 (2007): 463-78. For an important Silk Roads: Ancient and Modern, ed. translates as "god-house." See note 17.
study of Sogdian religious architecture, David Christian and Craig Benjamin, 36 Rong, "Sute Xianjiao meishu dong chuan
see V. G. Shkoda,"The Sogdian Temple: Silk Road Studies 4 (Macquarie guocheng Zhong de zhuanhua...," 62, esp.
Structure and Rituals," Bulletin of the Asia University and Turnhout: Brepols, 2000), figs. 4-6.
1-12. 37 Guojiawenwuju ed., 2004 Zhongguo
Instituteio (1996 [1998]): 195-206. On
Sogdian iconography, see Frantz Grenet, 30 Grenet, "Religious Diversity among zhongyao kaogu faxian (Beijing: Wenwu
"Mithra: Iconography in Iran and Central Sogdian Merchants", 469. This observa? chubanshe,2005); Wenwu (2008), no.
Asia," Encyclopaedia Iranica Online tion was also made earlier by others, e.g., 6:14-35; Shi Anchang, Huotan yujisi
(2006), [Link]. For further Judith Lerner, "Central Asians in niaoshen (Beijing: Cijincheng chubanshe,
bibliography on the Sogdians, see note 9 Sixth-Century China: A Zoroastrian 2004), 114-16; Mary Boyce, "Corpse," in
above and Matthew Canepa's article in Funerary Rite," Iranica Antiqua 30 (1995):Encyclopaedia Iranica (1993) 6:279-88;
this volume. 179-90. Gherardo Gnoli,"Indo-Iranian Religion,"
28 The bridge on An Jia's couch is not 31 Frantz Grenet, Penelope Riboud and Yang in Encyclopaedia Iranica Online (2004),
conclusively identified as the Cinwad Junkai, "Zoroastrian Scenes on a Newly [Link]; A. Shapur Shabazi,
Bridge and the scene is typically described Discovered Sogdian Tomb in Xi'an, "ast?d?ns" in Encyclopaedia Iranica (1989)
as an outing or farewell: see Shaanxi sheng Northern China," Studia Iranica 33 2:851-53. Shi links a reference to a "spirit
kaogu yanjiusuo, XV an Bei Zhou An Jia (2004): 276-78. couch" (lingchuang Scffc) in the Jin shu to
mu, 38-39 and plates 73,77; Jiang Boqin, 32 Valentina Raspopova, "Life and Artistic a description of Sogdian burial ritual in
Zhongguo Xianjiao yishi shiyanjiu, 113; Conventions in the Reliefs of the Miho the Sui shu, but the latter passage does not
Ahmad Tafazzoli, "Cinwad Puhl," in Couch," Bulletin of the Miho Museum 4 clearly denote an object buried in the
Encyclopaedia Iranica, 5 (1991), 594-95; (2004): 44 grave: Shi, Huotan yujisi niaoshen, 115-16.
Mary Boyce, "Death among Zoroastri 33 Raspopova, "Life and Artistic Conven? 38 For the most comprehensive archaeo?
ans," in Encyclopaedia Iranica, 7 (1996), tions," 47. Some scholars certainly avoid logical study of Persian Zoroastrian
171. Compare medieval and contemporary this type of language, which presumes a religious practices, see Dietrich Huff,
Zoroastrian funerary and commemora? superior paradigm. Grenet takes a "Archaeological Evidence of Zoroastrian
tive ritual: Firoze M. Kotwal and broader perspective and interprets the Funerary Practices," in Stausberg, Zoroas?
Jamsheed K. Choksy,"To Praise the Souls visual imagery on these stone structures trian Rituals in Context, 593-630; on the
of the Deceased and the Immortal Spirits as evidence of religious diversity. Angela inscriptional and archaeological evidence
of the Righteous Ones: The Staomi or Sheng (cited by Grenet, "Religious and its bearing on the meaning of
Stum Ritual s History and Functions," in Diversity among Sogdian Merchants") dakma, 593-94.
5; Scott Pearce, Audrey Spiro and Patricia follows Abramson's text, but this author "The Merchant Empire of the Sogdians,"
Ebrey, eds., Culture and Power in the is cognizant of the problems with using in Juliano and Lerner, Monks and
Reconstitution of the Chinese Realm, terms that are not clear ethnonyms or Merchants, 220-29. On the Sogdian
200-600 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard political terms. ascendancy during this period, see
University Asia Center, 2001). 67 See Jonathan Karam Skaff, "Survival in Vaissiere, Sogdian Traders.
62 Bayart, Illusion of Cultural Identity, 66. the Frontier Zone: Comparative Perspec? 71 See Wenwu (2001), no. 7:40 - 51; Shanxi
63 Sometimes the term is made more tives on Identity and Political Allegiance sheng kaogu yanjiusuo and Taiyuan shi
specific, e.g.,jiehu or the foreign in China's Inner Asian Borderlands wenwu kaogu yanjiusuo, "Taiyuan Bei Qi
tribe known as the Jie. during the Sui-Tang Dynastic Transition Xu Xianxiu mu fajue jianbao," Wenwu
64 Historians of China have noted that (617-630)," Journal of World History (2003), no. 10:4-40.
these perceptions emerged out of the (June 2004), [Link] 72 The history has been recounted in several
rise of a national consciousness in the [Link]/cgi-bin/justtop. sources, most recently in Mark Lewis,
nineteenth and early twentieth centuries cgi?act=justtop&url=[Link] China Between Empires (Cambridge,
and have largely informed modern [Link]/journals/jwh/15.2/ Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2009).
historical narratives. A few modern [Link] (accessed July 8, 2008); and 73 The character of Jinyang and the dual
historians of the Northern Dynasties Naomi Standen, Unbounded Loyalty: polity system (with Ye) is explained well
and Tang, such as Chen Yinke, have Frontier Crossings in Liao China in John Lee, "Conquest, Division,
offered a more complex view of the (Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, Unification: A Social and Political History
paths of exchange. 2007); Abramson, Ethnic Identity in Tang of Sixth Century Northern China" (Ph.D.
65 Writing on Manchu institutions, Mark China. dissertation, University of Toronto, 1985),
Elliott has argued against adopting this 68 For an overview and translation see ch.4.
perspective, noting that "despite the Juliano and Lerner, Monks and Merchants, 74 The surge of Central Asian goods into
many and varied signs of Manchu 47-49. More detailed accounts can be Central Plains China is largely attributed
acculturation, it must be said, however, found in Nicholas Sims-Williams, "The to the opening up of Central Asian trade
that using the word 'Sinicization' to Sogdian Merchants in China and India," routes in mid-sixth-century China after