Teaching Math: Concepts & Assessment
Teaching Math: Concepts & Assessment
Approaches to mathematics
teaching and learning
People are more likely to continue learning and using mathematics if they learn it
s
with understanding and see its beauty and the possibility of applying it to matters
that interest them, including games as well as more practical matters. Skill with
ge
the traditional basics is important to facilitate creative thinking about complex
questions. However, skill alone is unlikely to prepare students for their future.
Those who have learned with understanding are more likely to remember the
pa
skills, to apply them efficiently and to be able to rediscover skills they may forget.
They will be able to transfer their knowledge to new problems in the future and
figure out mathematics for new situations. (Willoughby, 2010, p. 83)
e
pl
m
CHAPTER OUTCOMES
Sa
UNDERSTANDING THE WAYS in which mathematics is learned has changed. Once, the manner in
which the content was organised was considered paramount and good teaching focused on ways
of transmitting this preformed knowledge from teacher to learner. Content was categorised into
a detailed syllabus, suggesting that an existing mathematics simply needed to be conveyed to
children. Examples of each new idea were produced by the teacher, explained to the class, and
followed up with practice in the form of worksheets or textbook pages. The role of the learner
was to practise what was provided until it could be readily reproduced. Only then would the
(successful) learner be shown and given practice in ways of applying this knowledge to different
situations. In turn, the degree to which these procedures could be acquired and used determined
the mathematical status of the individual learner and revealed the mathematical aptitudes with
which they had been endowed.
When one aspect of the syllabus had been addressed to the satisfaction of the teacher, the next was
introduced and the program proceeded throughout a year and across year levels. Yet, often children
had not taken in the material as had been assumed. It is for this reason that assessment came to be
s
seen as central to teaching. Only by determining how well an idea or procedure had been mastered
could the next step in the learning sequence be introduced. Initially, the focus was on assessment at
ge
the completion of a teaching segment, but analysis of children working in classroom situations also
came to be seen as crucial to building mathematical knowledge. This showed that the manner in
which individual children interpreted what was presented to them was often quite different from
pa
that assumed when the content was organised. In this way, recognition of the significance of diagnostic
assessment—where the underlying thinking being used became the focus of investigation, rather than
the answers produced—gradually emerged as a significant part of the means to measure the success of
a teaching approach or sequence. Assessment is now seen as a central component of teaching and
e
learning—it needs to be an integral part of the planning used to build children’s mathematical abilities.
pl
that can be manipulated in their own right that allows a mathematical way of thinking to be
formed and applied to the problems of everyday life.
These considerations of the ways in which children learn led to a growing awareness that they
do not simply take in mathematical knowledge that is merely transmitted to them, no matter
how well organised and justified it is. Children are frequently observed to build their own ways
of doing mathematics despite material or procedures introduced by a teacher. Sometimes this has
led to alternative ways of coming to terms with mathematics and of using it to solve problems.
a young child might answer ‘Ten and 1 more is 11’, or ‘4 and 4 is eight, 9, 10, 11’, ‘2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11’,
or other ways of grouping the counters rather than simply count ‘1, 2, 3, . . . 11’.
s
ge
At other times, the way that children build their own ways of doing mathematics has produced
consistent patterns of errors or misconceptions when place value is overlooked, renaming is
neglected, and the significance of zero is not appreciated.
pa
4 7
While 7 and 9 has been correctly determined as 16 this has been written under
+3 9 the ones place, rather than renamed as 1 ten 6 ones, which would give a correct
716 answer of 86.
e
pl
3 5
4 9 While the multiplication of the ones digits and the tens digits has been
Sa
Rather than rename and use a remainder to determine the next step in the
division process, the child has seen that 5 cannot be divided by 9 and moved
to correctly divide 54 by 9 to get 6. This has then been recorded above the 54,
6 3 rather than in the hundreds place.
9 )5 4 2 7 When the next digit, 2, could not be divided by 9, instead of recording a
0 in the tens place to show this, the child has grouped the remaining digits
together to get 27 and divided this by 9 to give 3 which has been written above
the 27, instead of in the ones place. This has resulted in an incorrect answer of
63 instead of 603.
Learning that builds on the needs and knowledge of individual students also parallels the way
in which mathematics evolved as people tried to come to terms with and make sense of problems
in their everyday lives. In the early years of school, concepts in number, measurement, geometry,
statistics and probability have always been developed in a similar manner through story situations
from the children’s own lives. Thus, addition and subtraction concepts and facts have grown from
realistic embodiments, rather than through exercises in acquiring the addition and subtraction
symbols + and – and their use with number symbols. This emphasis on problem situations out of
which mathematics can grow is essential all the way through a student’s schooling. As problems
are understood and reconciled, the mathematics that is needed and that can develop from making
sense of the solution process is personally developed and owned.
Learning mathematics, then, is necessarily an active process; the concepts and processes are
too complex and the ideas often too abstract to allow them to be simply accepted through
reading or telling. Children need to be involved in the formation of these new ways of thinking
if they are to find them personally meaningful and be able to use them in different settings and
formats. Experiences with problematic situations are fundamental to the way in which concepts
and processes are built up or acquired, and resources for assisting learning need to incorporate
play, games, everyday situations and objects from the child’s world as well as specialised materials
that might be seen to embody mathematical ideas.
s
Learning as a social activity
ge
Learning is also a social activity, and both the mathematics and the manner in which it is
learned are influenced by the way children interact with each other and with their teachers.
pa
Children construct meaning not only through the experiences they have with materials and
problems, but also through examining and reflecting on their own reasoning and the reasoning of
others. Talking about ideas that are being generated, sharing ways of tackling tasks and resolving
difficulties, and describing outcomes that arise are integral to learning mathematics. At the same
time, existing conceptions, whether gained from everyday experiences or previous learning,
e
guide the understanding and interpretation of any new information or situation that is met. This
pl
that already exist. Consequently, the intuitive beliefs and methods of children may appear very
different from accepted mathematical practice and may also be very resistant to change. Teachers
Sa
will need to ask questions that challenge ill-formed ideas and inappropriate generalisations, and
pose new problems that will require the revision of old constructions or ways of thinking.
6 .5
6 .5 × 5 .8
+ 5 .8 Child: With decimals, you have to line up the decimal points. 51 .2
12 . 3 325 . 0
376 .2
The role of a teacher is often more as a facilitator of what is needed in order to become
proficient; however, there will always be a place for showing how things are to be done. The
challenge will then be to lead children to come to understand and accept this as a method of
their own, rather than simply practising and acquiring by rote another person’s way of doing
something. Evidence from children who have experienced difficulty in learning mathematics
has shown that those who simply acquired teacher taught techniques by rote were often unable
to apply this knowledge and frequently forgot, or at least were unable to recall when needed,
knowledge that had been earlier assumed to have been learned (Booker, 2011). In contrast, those
who participated actively in their own learning were more able to use this knowledge and tended
to maintain it for future use and adaptation.
1 m 3 5 cm 1 3 5 cm
Cooperative learning
Rather than working in isolation from other learners, it is often better for children to work
cooperatively so as to encourage mathematical discussion and resolution of the various
interpretations that emerge. Group activities and projects need to be organised to allow
children to work on shared tasks, rather than have them perform individually on problems,
worksheets, even pages from a text. In this way, they can work together in pairs or groups of
s
3 or 4, taking turns to record any working or observations in order to discuss them with the
ge
larger group later. Of course, at first one child may do more of the thinking and activity than
the others, but whole class discussion about the mathematics of the situations on which they
are working can then focus on the need of all the children to be able to talk about the activity.
pa
Indeed, judicious questioning of the child who watched more than participated can draw
attention to the need to attend to all aspects of the task at hand and to voice uncertainties as
they occur, rather than leave it to the more capable or dominant child. This allows a variety
of ways of thinking about a particular situation to arise and add to the richness of the learning
for all participants.
e
Cooperative learning can then go beyond merely working together on set tasks, and an
pl
atmosphere can be created in which children construct their own mathematical conceptions.
The goals of learning, the discussions about the means of achieving those goals and the individual
paths taken need to be at the centre of classroom learning. An attitude that each individual will
m
reach their learning goal only if the others in the group also reach their goals is as important as
the goals themselves. This is in distinct contrast to a classroom where learning is individualistic or
Sa
competitive, with children working by themselves at their own pace to achieve goals unrelated to
those of their classmates.
Learning cooperatively is also crucial in promoting children’s ability to communicate and
reason mathematically. The interactions between teachers and children, and especially among
children, influence what is learned and how it is learned. In particular, attempts to communicate
their thinking help to develop children’s understanding that mathematics is conjectural in
nature—that mathematical activity is concerned with reasoning about possibilities, rather
than learning the results presented by others. Indeed, trying to make sense of methods and
explanations they see or hear from others is fundamental to constructing mathematical meanings
(Yackel et al., 1990). Within a framework of learning cooperatively, each child can be viewed
both as an active reorganiser of their personal mathematical experiences and as a member of a
community or group in which they actively participate in the continual regeneration of ‘taken-
as-shared’ ways of doing mathematics (Cobb & Bauersfeld, 1995). Institutionalised practices such
as using tens and ones in a place value sense, or following a particular method for measuring
the area of a circle, can then emerge anew for each child, yet conform to accepted norms of
mathematical behaviour.
s
to participate in mathematics at all levels, and to engage with the science and technology courses
ge
that lead to more high status and influential STEM related careers.
Vale and Bartholomew (2008) reported that PISA surveys showed that boys are more often
among the highest achievers, and that: pa
there remains a difference in the ways that male and female students respond to their own mathematical
experiences . . . boys reported higher levels of enjoyment, interest and self-efficacy in mathematics than
girls, and boys more highly valued the use of technology in mathematics. (Vale & Bartholomew, 2008)
They also suggest that this leads to boys being more likely to enrol in higher level mathematics
e
than girls, because of the widely reported positive relationship between affective factors and
enrolment. In particular, this has led Forgasz (2010) and Vale (2010) to identify a widening gender
pl
gap favouring males in achievement in primary and secondary mathematics and participation at
the senior secondary level, and to suggest that teachers need to continue to be aware of ‘gender as
m
in mathematical learning and the behaviours freely committed to game playing led to the inclusion
of instructional games in mathematics programs. Initially, this use concentrated on practice aspects
such as that required for basic fact learning, to provide motivation or to reward children for
progress they have made. However, observations of games being played led to their extension to
a wider range of concepts and processes (Larouche, Bergeron & Herscovics, 1984), and use can
also be made of the interest generated by games to assist children to generalise to the more abstract
recorded forms and higher level mathematical ideas. Indeed, Vygotsky (1978) has argued that ‘the
influence of play on a child’s development is enormous’, in that action and meaning can become
separated and abstract thinking can thereby begin.
Above all, involvement in instructional games induces children to make sense of their ideas and
the interpretations of others. The dialogue engaged in while playing facilitates the construction
of mathematical knowledge, allowing the articulation and manipulation of each player’s thinking.
Such communication helps to extend a conceptual framework through a process of reflection and
points to the central role of language, as the social interaction gives rise to genuine mathematical
s
issues. In turn, these problems engender an exchange of ideas, with children striving to make
sense of their mathematical activity, and lead them to see mathematics as a social process of sense
ge
making requiring the construction of consensual mathematical understandings.
Learning cooperatively and using instructional games can lead children to value persistence in
working at a challenging task, in contrast to the mere repetition of similar exercises; to engage in
pa
meaningful activity in preference to procedures acquired by rote; and to see that cooperation and
negotiation are productive at both a personal and social level. Consequently, the learning of mathematics
can be viewed as an active, problem solving process in which social interactions help to promote
understanding and reconcile the various interpretations and ways of thinking and acting that can arise.
e
pl
computer games, many of which provide engaging learning situations and enhance motivation
(Wall, Beatty & Rogers, 2015; Harrison, 2018; Booker, 2002; 2004). However, it is important that
these uses of technology go beyond simply providing review and practice of material presented in
Sa
class to develop new ideas, strategies and approaches to problem solving. Choosing a quality app
or program from among those offered commercially or through teaching websites can provide
rich tasks for classroom use and lead to whole class discussion about the mathematics that is being
developed. In this way, as Harrison (2018) points out, while ‘[a] good mathematical app does not
replace a good mathematics teacher—it can, however, make good mathematics teaching easier’.
But this can only occur if the mathematical ideas and processes presented within the app are in
line with classroom and curriculum approaches and expectations.
The use of resources such as YouTube, tablets, spreadsheets, dynamic software and digital
learning resources—for example, resolve (www.resolve.edu.au), topdrawer (topdrawer.aamt.edu.
au), scootle (www.scootle.edu.au) and the national digital learning resources network (https://
www.esa.edu.au)—continues to change the face of mathematics in today’s classrooms (Olive &
Makar, 2010; Borba et al., 2017). The range of materials available is expanding constantly, with
access to lesson planning, development of particular mathematics ideas and processes, assessment
items, and suggestions for teaching a range of mathematical topics. Videos of expert teachers
engaging mathematics classes are another form of help readily available on many internet channels
and mathematics teaching sites.
s
of thinking and solving problems as a natural part of learning and using mathematics.
Calculators are, however, no more a simple replacement for other ways of doing things than
ge
they are obvious to use. Most adults who use calculators at work, home or for their leisure activities
were self taught and consequently feel less than adequately competent with certain functions or less
able to do certain computations efficiently. Effective ways of using this technology need to occur
pa
from the beginning years of school so that it is seen as simply one way among many to determine
answers, another way of expressing results, and, above all, as a tool to which understanding and
reasoning can be applied. In order to use a calculator in these ways, a number of mathematical
understandings and skills are required. Recognition of the various symbols and the actions they
e
represent (+, −, ×, ÷, =, √, %) is essential, as is knowing the concepts for these operations and the
variety of meanings and situations in which they might be used. Familiarity with the operations
pl
in other contexts is necessary in order to know when to use them, to provide some awareness
of likely outcomes, and to establish a measure of the reasonableness of results. Awareness of how
m
the various memory functions operate, including the constant keys, is also needed to allow more
efficient computation. A plan to ‘see’ what is happening when the calculator does not show it and
for recording intermediate results is also beneficial. It is helpful to learn to use the nonwriting
Sa
hand to key in numbers and operations and operate the calculator, so that the writing hand is
available to write any outcome or important points along the way.
The activities developed throughout Teaching Primary Mathematics refer to suitable calculator
activities, but the difficulty that always arises relates to the different key formats, operating procedures
and capabilities. Familiarity with the calculators used in the classroom needs to be built up by the
teacher and then explored jointly with the children. Calculators can be used as an integral part of
the learning across numeracy topics, but it is important for children and their teachers to realise
that a calculator needs to be seen as just one way of finding solutions among many. At times it will
be easier to obtain an answer using mental calculations; at other times an approximate result would
suffice; while an accurate solution may just as readily be found using pencil and paper as with a
calculator. The most important end result is that each individual child should be in a position to
choose the form of calculation best suited to a particular situation or task. At the same time, since
calculators can do things at a greater speed, misunderstandings can come to light more quickly. It is
much easier to make more mistakes, more frequently, on a calculator when you do not know what
you are doing than it is with pencil and paper computations. The calculator can thus also be a tool
to identify misconceptions and errors in a child’s mathematical ways of thinking.
As technology becomes ever more central to all aspects of life, there are
s
1.2 increasing calls for a more numerate population. It is no longer considered
sufficient for children simply to study mathematics; they need to be able to
ge
Comprehend the use their mathematical knowledge in an ever broadening range of activities.
significance of Over 2 decades ago, Orrill (2001) remarked that society is ‘awash in numbers’
numeracy and its
and ‘drenched in data’, and this has increased exponentially ever since thanks
pa
essential components
to the pervasive technology at the personal level as well as at work and study.
For those comfortable with and competent in thinking about numbers, this
provides a basis for evaluating such issues as the benefits and risks of medical treatments, estimates
for budgets that will allow or disallow access to education and transport, and many other concerns
e
that were once available only to specialists and those in the know. Conversely, individuals who
lack an ability to think numerically will be disadvantaged and at the mercy of other people’s
pl
interpretation and manipulation of numbers. Indeed, as Steen noted as long ago as 1997, ‘an
innumerate citizen today is as vulnerable as the illiterate peasant of Gutenberg’s time’. Expanding
m
his analysis later, Steen highlighted that, in contrast to the study of further mathematics, numeracy
is concerned with applying elementary ideas in sophisticated settings, rather than generalising
these ideas to more abstract concepts and more complex processes.
Sa
Mathematics thrives as a discipline and as a school subject because it was (and still is) the tool par excellence
for comprehending ideas of the scientific age. Numeracy will thrive similarly because it is the natural tool
for comprehending information in the computer age. (Steen, 2001, p. 111)
been completed, and focusing on the thinking processes that were followed, the attempts that were
made along the way, and the justification that allows particular approaches and solutions, can be
used to build up an ability to read, write and speak with and about mathematics.
As the certainties of the past have given way to the uncertainties of the present and future,
this also means that the formal techniques of number, measurement and geometry that gave exact
and unalterable results must make room for ways to examine and explore less certain situations
using statistics and probability, and include a range of estimation and approximation processes.
Thus, numeracy should be seen to include the content of mathematics, particularly number sense,
spatial sense, measurement sense, data sense and a feeling for chance, together with a focus on
problem solving and the uses of mathematics in communication, as shown in the table below.
Numeracy overview
NUMERACY
s
CONTENT + PROBLEM SOLVING + SENSE MAKING + COMMUNICATION
ge
●● number number sense
●● measurement ●● analyse the problem ●● understanding of ●● discuss and write
●● geometry pa numeration and about mathematics
●● statistics and ●● explore possible means computation ●● reflection
probability to a solution
●● algebra spatial sense
●● select and try a ●● visualisation of ●● present arguments
e
solution process properties and in mathematical
relationships form
Focus on
pl
●● interpret data
●● technology— ●● analyse solution and measurement sense presented
calculators, apps, possible answer’s sense ●● application of graphically and
m
●● estimation vs exact
●● mental processes as sense of statistics
well as recorded and probability
●● inclination to use
flexibility
●● personal strategies
●● ability to interpret
Since 2008, the National Assessment Program in Numeracy has been used to determine the
proportion of students who have achieved nationally agreed numeracy standards. From 2016, it
has been aligned to the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics incorporating proficiency strands of
conceptual understanding, fluency, problem solving and reasoning across the content strands of
Number and Algebra; Measurement and Geometry; Statistics and Probability.
●● Understanding—comprehension of mathematical concepts, operations and relations, and the
connections among them—the ‘why’ as well as the ‘how’ of mathematics.
s
relationship between the proficiency strands and the content strands can be summarised as shown
in the following table.
ge
MATHEMATICS
location and
algebraic thinking transformation
m
Fluency
Sa
Problem solving
Reasoning
This summary of the components of the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics framework has
been designed to highlight several important aspects that need to be considered. The relevant
space in the diagram given to each proficiency strand is designed to show the following:
●● The development of conceptual understanding needs to be established prior to further
development of a topic or content area, as it is critical to building up fluency and problem
solving.
●● Fluency means a process can be accessed and used efficiently and accurately almost without
thinking of the steps involved, so that thought can be given to the way it is used rather than
to the procedures to be followed in its use.
●● Problem solving does not arise simply as a consequence of understanding and fluency. Time
and resources need to be allocated as much to establishing problem solving as to building
competence with computational and other processes.
●● Reasoning will be developed along with understanding, fluency and problem solving, but
there also needs to be time devoted to ensuring that students develop an increasingly
sophisticated capacity for logical thought and actions, such as analysing, proving, evaluating,
explaining, inferring, justifying and generalising.
Within Number and Algebra, numeration (understanding number) is critical; addition and
subtraction are grouped as additive thinking; multiplication and division are brought together as
multiplicative thinking; and emphasis on the thinking underpinning numeration and computational
processes is viewed as algorithmic thinking, a way of thinking that underpins all higher mathematics,
rather than simply as procedures for obtaining answers that can be learned in isolation. Similarly,
the components of Measurement and Geometry, Statistics and Probability, drawn from the content
s
descriptions, need to be seen as linked together with Number and Algebra to form a connected
and coherent view of the mathematics to be learned, rather than as distinct topics, each with
ge
different procedures and ways of operating.
As Hiebert and Grouws (2007) noted in their synthesis of international research calling for a
more detailed, richer and coherent knowledge base to inform practice:
pa
Two features of classroom teaching facilitate students’ conceptual development (and mathematical
proficiency), explicit attention to connections among ideas, facts and processes, and engagement of
students struggling with mathematics. (Hiebert & Grouws, 2007, p. 391)
e
The Australian Curriculum: Mathematics has been designed to build students’ conceptual
understanding, and thus fluency, by attending explicitly to the connections among all aspects
pl
of the mathematical content. As teachers, we need to ensure that students engage with the
mathematics they are learning, and that this mathematics is not simply focused on routines that are
m
readily known, but provides a move towards deeper and more powerful knowledge that challenges
all students at all levels. Struggling to come to terms with this mathematics will then become a
natural and enjoyable part of mathematics learning.
Sa
Nonetheless, as Cobb, Yackel and Wood observed, ‘manipulative materials can play a central
role if we wish students to learn with understanding, but the way the materials are interpreted
s
and acted upon must necessarily be negotiated by the teacher and students’ (1992, p. 7). The
materials are not ‘transparent’ representations of a readily apprehensible mathematics, but instead
ge
are vehicles for the potential meanings that children might construct.
1.3
Using materials to develop mathematics
pa
The need for materials and models is fundamental in teaching mathematics
Explain the importance because so many of the ideas that have to be learned are not intrinsically
of using materials to obvious. They were generalised and developed from diverse and obscure
develop mathematical situations over a long period of time, usually by mature thinkers who had
e
concepts and processes
particular social or intellectual needs. If young children are to be assisted to
pl
develop the same forms of thinking, then situations in which these ideas can be
discerned and discussed are essential. It is for this reason that the teaching of mathematics has had a
long tradition of using structured materials, materials through which the underlying mathematical
m
ideas might come to be perceived and appreciated. For instance, ten frames and bundling sticks
are used to establish early numbers, Base 10 materials show the place value patterns for larger
Sa
numbers, and region models give meaning to fraction ideas. Even comparatively simple notions
such as the initial number concepts are abstractions rather than something that can be seen in the
immediate environment. The number nine does not exist in the real world, but is a representation
that children need to construct for themselves by linking objects with language and symbols within
meaningful experiences with materials that sometimes show and sometimes do not show the
concept of nineness. Similarly, the basic spatial forms can only take on meaning through seeing
and making representations of the general notion of what will come to be called a rectangle or a
triangle and learning to distinguish one from the other.
At the same time, it must be borne in mind that materials by themselves do not literally
carry mathematical meaning. While they might assist in the initial building of understanding, it
is reflection on the actions of the materials and the situations that they represent that allows the
generalisation to a mathematical way of thinking, rather than a rote learning of the results of these
actions. If children focus solely on the outcomes, it is possible that they will simply learn at a
surface level how to manipulate the materials rather than the deeper, fundamental mathematical
ideas. This risk becomes even larger if the materials come to be seen as ends in themselves, rather
than as links to the mathematical concepts and processes they are intended to represent.
For instance, many children are introduced to a number line early in their learning of number
concepts, using ‘hops’ or ‘jumps’ forwards or backwards on it in order to count on or back, add or
subtract. Often such a number line does not include zero, but starts at 1:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
However, use of the number line as a means to find answers leads to children seeing only the
points on a line, rather than the fact that the numbers actually represent the distances from zero.
When fraction ideas are introduced, a number line is essential to show how these new numbers
occur among the whole numbers based on the distances between the whole numbers.
proper fractions
7 8
4 3 improper fractions
1
common fractions 1 34 2
23 mixed numbers
s
2
ge
0 1 2 3 4 5
A number line shows that fractions are parts of 1 one, 2 ones, 3 ones, … and names them as
proper and improper fractions, mixed numbers, decimal fractions and per cents
The early use of points on a number line also leads children to focus on the result, rather than
e
on the thinking that supports the result—for instance, counting 1, 2, 3 when counting on from 9
instead of 10, 11, 12. This often results in an incorrect result of 9 when the counting begins at 9
pl
1 2 3
Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Similarly, when adding 6 and 3, they may count 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, then a further 1, 2, 3 to get to
an answer which is then determined by counting all the way from 1 to 9. Since these approaches
are hard to keep track of mentally when the number line is no longer available, fingers are often
used to obtain the answers, and then become the main means of responding to addition and
subtraction basic fact questions or when they are needed in other processes.
3 4 8
2 7
2 3
1
5 6 Child: The answer is 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8.
1 With the 6th finger counted twice, the child has answered 8;
whereas counting on from 6 would give 7, 8, 9.
Moreover, when counting, children will often count using the last number rather than
beginning with the next number, so that in counting on and addition their answers are 1 too
small, while for counting back and subtraction their answers are 1 too large. They may count to
6, then begin at 6 to count a further 1, 2, 3 to get to an answer of 8, or count back 3 from 10 to
get an answer of 8 by saying 10, 9, 8.
Use of the number line with a focus on the counting numbers 1, 2, 3, . . . also leads to children’s
difficulties with initial measurement techniques. If zero is not integrated into their conception of
numbers from the beginning, they assume that the initial mark to be used on a ruler is the 1 and
then find that all of their measurements are one unit too short.
s
ge
Another common example of when children experience difficulties because of the way they
see manipulating material as an end in itself is when bundling sticks or Base 10 materials are
used to introduce the addition algorithm. When the first examples given involve only simple
combinations such as 43 + 35, a correct answer can be given by simply putting the tens and then
the ones together.
pa
tens ones
e
pl
4 3
1 3 5
m
7 8
Sa
Yet, later on, it will be necessary to join the ones before the tens in order to cope with
additional tens that might result. With the materials, this can be accounted for by rearranging the
sticks that result. In the written form, it needs to occur as the algorithm proceeds or else there is
a danger that an example like 47 + 39 is answered with 716, rather than 86.
tens ones
4 7
1 3 9
716
Thus, materials by themselves will not be sufficient and their use needs to actively engage
children’s thinking with guidance from teachers and other users as they build towards long term
outcomes of which the learner may initially have little awareness.
Materials are not something to be used only at the beginning of mathematics teaching and
learning. Concepts and processes need to be introduced through realistic problem settings at
all levels, and materials offer a very feasible way of portraying both the problem and its possible
solutions, leading to the generalisations which constitute higher mathematics. At the same time,
there is a need to guard against the use of ad hoc exemplars—that is, materials that seem to assist
the task at hand but that in the longer run prove to be inadequate for further developments.
Rather, materials that can be used for many different purposes can assist in building a connected
view of mathematics. There would seem to be advantages in using the same representation in
different situations, rather than using different representations in the same situation (Clements &
McMillen, 1996). The teaching of fraction ideas is perhaps the most compelling topic where this
has been overlooked. Models involving regions of a circle show the parts within a whole but
s
do not allow children readily to show for themselves the basic part/whole conception. Indeed,
ge
many children choose the length across the diameter of the circle on which to measure off
equal parts, rather than determine same sized portions of the area of the circle.
pa
instead of
e
A circle partitioned to show 8 (equal) parts
pl
Another difficulty is that these circular models cannot readily be extended to decimal fractions or
per cents, yet these are all the same fundamental fraction idea.
m
Similarly, when materials based on regional models are used to portray addition, a child may
have difficulty interpreting the diagrams used.
Sa
It is even more difficult to envisage how these models would be able to show subtraction, let alone
multiplication or division.
While some materials would seem to suit certain purposes well, other situations demand
different models. Yet, if there are too many different models for a given concept, children will
need to be operating at a formal level of cognition to bring the diverse representations together
into the one understanding. It is more likely that they will see each material or model as a distinct
entity and try to learn many fragmented rules. Thus, children who have been introduced to
multiplication as groups or steps on a number line and in terms of area tend to view each separately
with its own ways of proceeding. Consequently, they end up with no firm basis of multiplication
at all. In contrast, if the use of materials at first focuses on one strong model or material, such as
an array for multiplication, not only will this give security to the initial conception, but it will
provide a basis for future development to all of the possible representations by reference back to
a secure, fundamental idea.
It is rather analogous to the manner in which a plant grows; at first a strong central stem is
produced, and only when this is secure do other limbs branch off. Where many stems emerge at
the same time, competition ensures that there is no single branch strong enough to last on its own
and frequently the whole plant simply withers and dies. Thus, wherever possible the material or
model that will assist the end point of development should be the one that introduces the initial
idea and be the backbone of the development from beginning to end. If the same materials can
also be used for different but related aspects of mathematics, so much the better. This will be of
invaluable assistance in allowing a cohesive, connected view of mathematics and its applications
to be developed.
A further difficulty with many of the materials and models proposed for classroom use is
that they actually demand knowledgeable users. It is the experience and understanding of the
proponent that carries the mathematics, rather than the materials themselves. The use of circular
s
regions for common fractions, mentioned earlier, is an instance of this. In reality, it is the angular
measure about the centre that determines the number of parts, yet children often meet and use
ge
these models some time before they come to terms with angles as such.
120°
pa 72°
Another instance is when the values of the Base 10 materials used to show hundreds, tens
pl
and ones are suddenly altered to show decimal fractions. It is important that the materials and
models themselves are able to portray the underlying ideas so that constant interjection and
m
explanation by the teacher who is using them is not necessary. Otherwise, the materials or
models may simply be a distracter and the children resort to learning how to manipulate them
at a surface level instead of coming to terms with the ideas that are supposed to be portrayed.
Sa
Materials and models are fundamental to learning mathematics in all forms and at almost all
levels, although their nature and the ways in which they are referred to may change. At some
point they may need to be very concrete, able to be picked up, pulled apart or manipulated.
The use of such materials can build in from the outset that mathematics is fundamentally an
experimental science; conjectures need to be made and evaluated in place of simply acquiring
a mass of seemingly immutable facts and rules. Mathematics at all levels is a developing body
of knowledge. Activities inherent in the use of materials and models can introduce that way of
thinking from the very beginnings of its development in each child. Such materials will include
Base 10 blocks to represent numbers and calculations; clocks, money, rulers, balances and other
instruments for measurement; solid objects, drawing instruments and online maps for geometry;
and physical graphs and the use of dice or spinners for statistics and probability.
At a later time, a pictorial reference may suffice. Actual objects may give way to pictures or diagrams
of them to represent numbers and computations; computer programs may simulate measurement,
geometry, and statistics and probability; and diagrams formed in one’s head may replace pencil and paper
drawings for problem solving across all areas of mathematics. Indeed, a reference to the experiences
that were produced with materials may be all that is needed to allow the development of further ideas.
s
1.4
live. However, as teachers and students attempt to come to terms with their
ge
mathematical understandings, the meanings given and taken may differ not Recognise the role of
only from one another but also from the intended mathematics (Pirie, 1998). language in teaching
Care is needed that the language used matches the materials and experiences and learning
mathematics
pa
provided, the language levels of the learners, and the mathematical concepts
and processes being addressed.
Yet, mathematics classrooms were once envisaged as silent places and communication from one
child to another about the mathematics they were trying to come to terms with was discouraged,
seen as a form of cheating. Now, talking about the ideas that arise is encouraged, and cooperation
and communication are desired behaviours rather than forbidden practices. When mathematical
ideas are communicated, particular care is taken in formulating language to keep track of what
is happening with materials or representations, which will eventually allow formal symbolic
recording, mental operations or approximations to be conducted confidently.
Throughout Teaching Primary Mathematics, this aspect of the development of mathematics
is fundamental, with particular attention paid to the use of materials and patterns to engender an
appropriate way of governing the more formal symbolic expressions of mathematical processes through
the use of a language that at first describes and then directs the thinking that is involved. Care has been
taken in establishing uses of materials to lay the foundation for particular processes and in using a
form of language at a level appropriate to both the learner and the mathematics. The same remarks
about meaning that were applied to the use of materials are also pertinent to the language that can be
encouraged to emerge from the concrete experiences. As mathematical ideas are constructed, so too
must be the language that enables them to become the individual learner’s own. In turn, this leads to
the thinking that ensures each child possesses control over the processes. Consistency in this use of
language is extremely important. This does not necessarily mean that individual words need to be used
in preference to others; rather, that their meaning is available to the particular group of children and
is consistent with the use of materials, the patterns that emerge, and from one situation to the next.
Does 3 times 4 mean 4 x 4 x 4 or 3 x 3 x 3 x 3, or both? 3 fours and 4 threes are much clearer
and can be shown to have the same meaning through the use of an array
● ● ● ●
s
● ● ● ●
ge
● ● ● ●
Mathematics has often been called a symbolic language, reflecting the importance given to the
pa
concise symbols used to stand for concepts that in time allow these ideas to be manipulated easily.
Yet, mathematics is both oral and written, and language is needed to communicate the meaning
of symbolic statements. For example, a student is often able to say that ‘34 is 3 to the power 4’,
but when pressed they have no meaning at all for these words and may be unable to talk about 3
being a factor 4 times or that 34 means 3 × 3 × 3 × 3, or 81. Similarly, while the symbol π provides
e
a concise way of stating the ratio of circumference to diameter of a circle, unless the symbol can be
pl
verbalised it is unlikely that any meaning will be attached to it or to the various formulas, such as
πr2 for the area of a circle or 2πr for circumference, in which it is used. Indeed, it is through using
lengthy informal statements that sufficient understanding gives rise to a need for more succinct
m
symbols with which we most readily associate the writing of ideas in mathematics, and should be left
until the underlying meaning is quite clear. There needs to be a careful building up of experiences and
descriptions on which new mathematical words are based, and care needs to be taken in introducing
these words by reference to the underlying meaning. Since many of the words that are used have
entered mathematics from Greek, Latin or Arabic sources, investigating their original meanings can
also be helpful to children. For instance, many children have difficulties when asked to determine the
perimeter of a shape, but can readily measure the distance all the way around the outside of the shape.
There is often a distinction between knowing the meaning of a concept and being able to recall and use
the corresponding mathematical vocabulary. In fact, perimeter is made up of Greek words that literally
mean to measure around the outside. It is helpful to children to realise that we use the Latin expression
with the same meaning, circumference, when we measure the distance around the outside of a circle.
Other words in measurement and geometry also have origins that can help children move
from an informal description to adopt the more formal mathematical names. Some shapes are
named in terms of the angles they contain, using Greek number words for prefixes together with
part of the word gonia, which originally meant ‘corner’ and expanded to indicate ‘angle’, as in
pentagon (5 angles), hexagon (6 angles), and so on. Others are named using Latin prefixes, as in
triangle (3 angles) and rectangle (from words that mean ‘right angle’, hence 4 right angles), or are
named from Latin words that refer to sides, as in quadrilateral or equilateral. Interestingly, a triangle
in ancient Greek was trigon, which gave its name to the branch of mathematics called trigonometry,
while a 4 sided shape was called a tetragon before it was called a quadrilateral, thus giving rise to the
quadratic equation, which was concerned with ‘squared’ amounts.
Gon comes from the Greek word gonia, which means ‘angle’.
s
ge
Having some knowledge of the counting words in Latin and Greek can help with many of
the seemingly more complex words that are used in mathematics to name shapes, large numbers,
and even properties such as bisect or trisect. Knowing that dia means ‘across’ can help with the
meaning of diameter (a measure across a circle) and diagonal (a line from one vertex to another),
pa
while understanding that isos means ‘same’ can help fix the meaning of an isosceles triangle.
Diameter: a measure across a circle Diagonal: a line across from one vertex
to another
Sa
Treating the words of mathematics as parts of a specialised language can lead to building up the
meanings for children in the same way that word meanings are built up in a first language, rather than
assuming that they can be readily tagged to quite complex mathematical ideas. A very good source for
this information is a book published by the Mathematical Association of America on the etymology
of mathematical terms (Schwartzman, 1994). Linking to the sites History of Mathematical Symbolism
(http://jeff560.tripod.com/mathsym.html), Terminology (http://jeff560.tripod.com/mathword.html)
and the more general etymology site (www.etymonline.com) and searching ‘mathematics’ will quickly
provide the meaning and origin of words and symbols used in mathematics.
Another way in which the notion of language enters mathematics is through the use of words
that have subtly different meanings from those exhibited in their everyday use. For instance,
some words have their meaning expanded; in everyday use, the word ‘more’ means to increase,
but in many mathematics situations it means to find the difference, as in: I have 4 oranges, you
have 5 oranges. How many more oranges do you have than I have? Similarly, in everyday use the word
‘rectangle’ refers to a shape in which one side is longer than the other, while a ‘square’ has all sides
of equal length and a ‘curve’ is a line in the form of a bend, with no straight part. In mathematics,
the concept of rectangle includes squares, since each contains four right angles, and the notion
of a curve includes straight lines. Other words have their meaning contracted: the word ‘product’