ELE302 Notes
ELE302 Notes
Adam Szava
Fall 2021
Introduction
This is my compilation of notes from Electric Networks (ELE 302) from Ryerson
University. All information comes from my professor’s lectures, the textbook
Fundamentals of Electric Circuits, and online resources.
1
As you can see, the output voltage is controlled by the voltage controlled voltage
source. The voltage is vd which is the difference between v2 and v1 , multiplied
by some A which is the amplification multiplier (also called open loop gain).
vo ≈ Avd = A(v2 − v1 )
2
We do not care about pins 1,5, or 8. Pins 4 and 7 handle active power. Pins
2 and 3 hand input, and pin 6 handles output. If you apply a voltage to the
inverting input, it will appear with the opposite sign in the output, if you apply
a voltage to the non-inverting input it will appear with the same sign in the
output.
Next we compare ideal versus real values seen for the elements within the
op amp:
Variable Ideal Real
A ∞ 10 → 108
5
Ri ∞Ω 105 → 1013 Ω
Ro 0Ω 10 − 100Ω
The ideal Ri is infinite, this is because as Ri → ∞ =⇒ iin → 0. We want
the input current to be zero to not change the input signals. A is called the
open loop feedback due to the configuration. We will now discuss closed loop
feedback configurations.
3
One interesting fact we usually want to know about configurations of op
amps is the ratio vvoi . We can solve for this:
vo = A(vi − vo )
vo A
=
vi A+1
But remember A → ∞, so:
vo A
= lim
vi A→∞ A + 1
vo
= 1 =⇒ vo = vi
vi
Generally you can think of this configuration as a negative feedback loop,
which brings vo closer and closer to vi every unit of time, using the equation:
Assumptions
For an idea op amp in this negative feedback configuration we can make the
following assumptions:
1. The input current to either pin is zero.
i1 = i2 = 0
v2 − v1 = 0 =⇒ v2 = v1
4
These two equations will let you solve problems using an op amp in this config-
uration.
There is a practical limitation of real op amps which is important for lab 1.
Remember that this component needs to be powered by an outside source, and
so the output voltage cannot exceed the input voltage that powers the entire
circuit block. This voltage is called VCC , and so:
−VCC ≤ vo ≤ VCC
This means that the output of the op amp (vo ) can run in three modes in relation
to VCC :
5
Through the use of:
v1 = v2
ia = ib = 0
Along with KCL at the inverting input:
i1 = i2
We can derive that:
Rf
vo = − vi
R1
You can control the value of vo by adjusting Rf and R1 . Notably, the output
voltage will be of the opposite sign of the input, as in it was inverted.
Non-Inverting Amplifier
In this configuration vi is applied the noninverting input, with a resistor between
the ground and the inverting input. There is a negative feedback loop with a
resistor. The goal is to know how vo relates to vi .
6
Through the use of:
v1 = v2
ia = ib = 0
Along with KCL at the inverting input:
i1 = i2
Summing Amplifier
In this configuration, three voltages are applied v1 , v2 , v3 , and the output is the
sum of the three inputs. There is negative feedback loop with a resistor.
i1 + i2 + i3 − i = 0
This is called the weighted sum of all the voltages, as it takes into account each
voltage’s resistance. In the case thatR1 = R2 = R3 = Rf then:
vo = −(v1 + v2 + v3 )
7
Difference Amplifier
In this configuration, the difference between two inputs are amplified. There is
a negative feedback loop with a resistor.
R2
vo = (vb − va )
R1
... and if R2 = R1 :
vo = v b − va
... and it would be called a subtractor.
This is different than a regular op amp with no negative feedback because
now you can control the amplification by controlling R
R1 .
2
Cascading Amplifiers
You can put op amps that feed into each other in a line in whatever configuration
you want. Let’s say you have three op amps in a row, which feed into each other,
all with some amplification factor of A, like the following image:
8
Then we know that:
v 0 = A1 A2 A3 v 1
Which is true generally for n cascaded op amps.
9
3. t = 0 (Switch just closed)
v(0+ ) = v(0− )
i(0+ ) = i(0− )
As in the current is continuous. This means you can find the initial values of
either current of voltage by finding those values before the event at time t = 0
(before the switch closes). This is the state 2 diagram above.
Recall that for a capacitor, the following is true:
dv
iC (t) = C
dt
10
Notably this circuit has no independent sources, and so all of its energy is
that which is stored inside the inductor and capacitor at time t = 0, meaning:
v(0) = V0
i(0) = I0
Applying KV L around the loop we get:
vresistor + vL + vC = 0
vresistor = Ri
di
vL = L
dt
Z t
dv 1
iC = C =⇒ v(t) = i(τ )dτ
dt C −∞
... differentiating both sides with respect to time to get rid of the integral:
i
Ri0 + Li00 + =0
C
... and putting it in standard form:
d2 i R di 1
+ + i=0
dt2 L dt LC
This is a second order LDE which can have three possible types of solutions.
11
The solution to this DE depends on the solutions to it’s characteristic poly-
nomial (s1 , s2 ): s
2
R R 1
s1 = − + −
2L 2L LC
s
2
R R 1
s1 = − − −
2L 2L LC
These solutions are measured in nepers per second (Np/s).
We define (for source-free series RLC circuits):
R
α=
2L
1
ω0 = √
LC
... where α is called the neper frequency and ω0 is called the resonant frequency.
The particular values of α and ω0 change the way the variables will change
over time, there are three cases:
1. Overdamped when α > ω0
di(0) di(0) 1
Ri(0) + L + V0 = 0 =⇒ = − (RI0 + V0 )
dt dt L
Overdamped
In this case our solution to the DE is:
Where you can find the values of A1 , A2 given i(0) and i0 (0).
Both of our roots are negative and real, meaning the function will decay as
t → ∞:
12
Critically Damped
In this case our solution to the DE is:
Where you can find the values of A1 , A2 given i(0) and i0 (0).
Underdamped
In this case our solution to the DE is:
13
The behavior of this network is because of the damping effect, which is the
gradual loss of the initial stored energy. This happens because of the resistor,
in fact controlling the resistor can change what state the network is in. If R = 0
and all elements ideal then the response would be a perfect sinusoid, and called
loss-less. This oscillatory response happens because of the two different types
of storage elements in the circuit which flow the energy back and forth between
the inductor and capacitor.
The critically damped case is the borderline between the underdamped and
the overdamped cases, and it decays the fastest. In most practical applica-
tions we seek an overdamped circuit that is as close as possible to the critically
damped case.
Notably this circuit has no independent sources, and so all of its energy is
that which is stored inside the inductor and capacitor at time t = 0, meaning:
v(0) = V0
14
i(0) = I0
Applying KCL at the top node we get the following differential equation (in
terms of v(t)):
d2 v 1 dv 1
2
+ + v=0
dt RC dt LC
The characteristic polynomial of this DE has solutions of:
s 2
1 1 1
s1,2 = − ± −
2RC 2RC LC
We define (for source-free parallel RLC circuits):
1
α=
2RC
1
ω0 = √
LC
Once again, the particular values of α and ω0 change the way the variables
will change over time, there are three cases:
1. Overdamped when α > ω0
2. Critically damped when α = ω0
3. Underdamped when α < ω0
In all cases, constants A1 , A2 can be determined from the initial conditions
of v(0) and v 0 (0), which we can get from the following KVL equation:
V0 dv(0) dv(0) V0 + RI0
+ I0 + C =⇒ =−
R dt dt RC
Overdamped
In this case the solution is:
v(t) = A1 es1 t + A2 es2 t
Critically Damped
In this case the solution is:
v(t) = (A1 + A2 t)e−αt
Underdamped
In this case the solution is:
v(t) = e−alphat (A1 cos(ωd t) + A2 sin(ωd t))
Where: q
ωd = ω02 − α2
15
8.5 Step Response of a Series RLC Circuit
The step response of a circuit is obtained by a sudden application of a DC source
by means of a switch. In this section we study the following circuit:
Applying KVL around the loop when t > 0, we get the following equation:
d2 v R dv v Vs
+ + =
dt2 L dt LC LC
Which is a non-homogenous LDE, whose solution can be written in the form:
vt (t) is called the transient response and is the same as the solution to the
source-free RLC series circuit. vss is called the steady state response and is the
final value of v(t), as in:
vss (t) = v(∞)
Which in our case:
vss (t) = Vs
For this reason our solutions to the second order RLC circuit are:
Overdamped:
v(t) = Vs + A1 es1 t + A2 es2 t
Critically Damped:
Underdamped:
More generally, the complete response for any variable x(t) can be found
directly through:
x(t) = xt (t) + xss (t)
Where xt (t) is the transient response which dies out over time, and xss (t) =
x(∞) and represents the steady state response of the variable.
16
8.6 Step Response of a Parallel RLC Circuit
In this section we study the following circuit:
Applying KCL at the top node for t > 0 gets us the differential equation:
d2 i 1 di 1 Is
2
+ + =
dt RC dt LC LC
Which is a non-homogenous LDE¡ whose solution can be written in the form:
it (t) is called the transient response and is the same as the solution to the
source-free RLC parallel circuit. iss is called the steady state response and is
the final value of i(t), as in:
iss (t) = i(∞)
Which in our case:
iss (t) = Is
For this reason our solutions to the second order RLC circuit are:
Overdamped:
i(t) = Is + A1 es1 t + A2 es2 t
Critically damped:
i(t) = Is + (A1 + A2 t)e−αt
Underdamped:
x(0), x0 (0)
17
2. Turn off all independent sources and find the form of the transient re-
sponse xt (t) by applying KCL and KVL. Solve the DE, with two unknown
constants, in one of the following forms: overdamped, critically damped,
underdamped.
3. Obtain the steady-state response:
4. The total response is now found as the sum of the transient response and
steady-state response:
V (t) = A cos(ωt + φ)
... then the voltage across the capacitor would also be in the form:
VC (t) = A0 cos(ωt + φ0 )
If we vary the frequency, the amplitude and phase shift of VC would change as
well. This is because:
1
V¯C (ω) =
ˆ
̂ωC
... which is a function of ω.
18
14.2 The Transfer Function
The transfer function is a complex valued function which is the analytical tool
used to study the frequency response of a circuit.
The transfer function is the frequency-dependent ratio between a forced
function and its forcing function. For example a the voltage across a resistor
would be a forced function, while the voltage source would be its forcing function.
The forcing function (also called the input) is denoted X̄(ω). The forced
function (also called the output) is denoted Ȳ (ω). By definition the transfer
function (H̄(ω)) is:
Ȳ (ω)
H̄(ω) =
X̄(ω)
ˆ since the ω and ̂ˆ will always be
Sometimes this function is denoted H̄(̂ω)
together, and this notation emphasizes that it is a complex defined function.
There are four possible transfer functions:
1. Voltage Gain:
V̄0 (ω)
H̄(ω) =
V̄i (ω)
2. Current Gain:
I¯0 (ω)
H̄(ω) = ¯
Ii (ω)
3. Transfer Impedance:
V̄0 (ω)
H̄(ω) = ¯
Ii (ω)
4. Transfer Admittance:
I¯0 (ω)
H̄(ω) =
V̄i (ω)
Note that the output of the transfer function is a complex value and so it can
be graphed as a vector on the complex plane. As ω varies, the vector will both
rotate (φ(ω)) and scale H(ω), and written in the form:
H̄(ω) = H(ω)∠φ(ω)
This means that the plot of H̄ can be broken into two, one for magnitude and
one for phase. We will learn how to plot approximations of these using the
Bode Plot technique later on.
The transfer function will always be a ration of two complex polynomials N̄
and D̄:
N̄
H̄ =
D̄
The roots of the numerator polynomial are called zeros (ω = z1 , z2 , . . . ) of the
transfer function, and represent frequencies in which the forced function stops.
19
The roots of the denominator polynomial are called poles (ω = p1 , p2 , . . . ) of
the transfer function, and represent frequencies in which the transfer function
goes to infinity.
We now have the skills to determine the transfer function of the intro circuit
(by current division):
V̄0 ˆ
1̂ωC 1
H̄(ω) = ¯ = =
Vs ˆ
R + 1/̂ωC ˆ
1 + ̂ωRC
Which can be broken up into two real valued functions:
1
H(ω) = p , φ(ω) = − arctan(ωRC)
1 + (ωRC)2
Whose plots can be seen below:
20
We will learn how to plot these graphs in a systematic way by hand, but first
we need to learn how gain is notated.
Bode Plots
In this section we describe a systematic method to sketch an approximation to
to magnitude versus frequency, and phase versus frequency plots of the transfer
function. This is called the method of Bode plots, or just Bode plots.
The magnitude in decibels is plotted against the logarithm of the frequency,
and on a separate plot the phase in degrees is plotted against the logarithm of
the frequency. The setup would look like the following:
21
Here, the red represents the plot for the phase, while the blue markings represent
the plot for the magnitude. This will typically be done on two plots, but it is
combined here to save space.
The transfer function will always be written in the form:
2
K(̂ω)±1 (1 + ̂ωz1 ) 1 + ̂2β1 ω
ωk + ̂ω
ωk ···
H(w) = 2
(1 + ̂ω
p1 ) 1 + ̂2ω
ωn + ̂ω
ωn ···
This is called standard form of the transfer function and will be the basis
of how we plot Bode plots. The idea is that we learn how to plot each factor
separately, and then add them all together to make the entire plot.
Terminology:
1. Roots of the numerator are called zeros.
2. Roots of the denominator are called poles.
The dots refer to higher and higher degree terms which can appear in the transfer
function, for this course we will only have to consider constant, linear, and
quadratic terms.
The reason we use semilog paper is that it is a lot easier to graph the log
(base 10 unless otherwise specified) of the magnitude of the function for this
reason:
K(̂ω)±1 (1 + ̂ωz1 ) · · ·
20 log10 H(ω) = 20 log ̂ω
(1 + p1 ) · · ·
̂ω ̂ω
= 20 log|K| + 20 log (̂ω)±1 + 20 log 1 + + · · · − 20 log 1 + − ···
z1 p1
22
If we just graph each term individually, we can just add them all together at
the end and we will get the semilog plot.
Step 4 is the hardest part since you need to memorize the process for each
type of factor. The following is a list of them all.
2. H(ω) = ̂ω
23
In the previous image, the slope is 20dB/dec where dec refers to decade
which is a since tick on the x − axis, always 10 times bigger than the last.
1
3. H(ω) = ̂ω
̂ω
4. Simple Zero: H(ω) = 1 + z1
1
5. Simple Pole: H(ω) = ̂ω
1+ p
1
2
̂2ω ̂ω
6. Quadratic Zero: H(ω) = 1 + ωk + ωk
24
1
7. Quadratic Pole: H(ω) = ̂ω 2
1+ ̂2ω
ωn + ωn
Once you have plotted the factors individually, you want to combine them like
done in this diagram (the image uses s instead of ω):
The best way of doing this is by adding up the slopes in all the graphs and
denoting intervals. Then connecting it to a point you know at the start of the
interval.
25
If we want to find it’s resonant frequency (ω0 ), we must calculate at what
frequency is the inductive and capacitive impedances equal to each other.
1
Z̄ = R + ̂ωL +
̂ωC
1
Z̄ = R + ̂ ωL −
ωC
Now we take just the imaginary part since that is the inductive and capacitive
impedance, and set it to 0:
1
ω0 L − =0
ω0 C
1
ω0 = √ rad/s
LC
There are a few things to note here. First of all since the impedance of the
circuit is all resistive, this means that the entire voltage drop is across the
resistor. Effectively the inductor and capacitors are short circuits at the resonant
frequency. This also means that the voltage and current are in phase.
The average power dissipated by the circuit as a function of ω is:
1 2
P (ω) = I R
2
Vm
At ω = ω0 , I = R , so:
1 Vm2
P (ω0 ) =
2 R
We are also interested in what frequencies the circuit dissipates half of the
maximum power, also called the half-power frequencies (ω1 and ω2 ). This means
that:
V2
P (ω1 ) = P (ω2 ) = m
4R
26
Those frequencies are:
s 2
R R 1
ω1,2 =∓ + +
2L 2L LC
Additionally:
√
w0 = w1 w2
These frequencies have half the power, but around 70.7% of the maximum of
the√
graph, as you can see below. This comes from dividing the maximum value
by 2.
27
From this we can see if that the quality factor of a frequency response is the
ratio of its resonant frequency to its bandwidth. As the quality factor increases
the sharpness of the transfer function also increases, becoming more selective.
All of the equations mentioned in this section only work for the series resonant
circuit.
28
Using a similar method as before (this time using the admittance) we can con-
clude:
1
ω0 = √
LC
and... s 2
1 1 1
ω1,2 =∓ + +
2RC 2RC LC
1
B = ω2 − ω1 =
RC
ω0 R
Q= = ω0 RC =
B ω0 L
For both series and parallel resonant circuits with a quality factor higher than
10:
B
ω1,2 ≈ ω0 ∓
2
29
2. High-pass Filter passes high frequencies and stops low frequencies.
30
The previous diagrams are all idealized.
Low-Pass Filters
Typically low pass circuits are constructed by taking the voltage off of a RC
circuit, like for example the following:
31
We are still concerned with the idea of a half-power frequency however now in
the context of filters we call it the cutoff frequency or the rolloff frequency (ωc ).
Once again this will be at max√
2
or approximately 70.7% of the maximum of the
transfer function.
1
ωc =
RC
This is where half the power is dissipated in the circuit compared to the maxi-
mum.
By definition, a low-pass filter is designed to pass signals from dc (ω = 0)
to the cutoff frequency (ω = ωc ).
High-Pass Filter
Typically high pass circuits are constructed by taking the voltage off the resistor
in an RC circuit. For example the following:
32
We can then also calculate it’s transfer function:
Vo ̂ωRC
H(ω) = =
Vi 1 + ̂ωRC
Which gives the following plot. Comparing it to the ideal high-Pass filter trans-
fer function you can see how it acts as one.
1
ωc =
RC
By definition, a high-pass filter is designed to stop filters from dc (ω = 0) to
the cutoff frequency (ω = ωc ).
Band-Pass Filters
A band-pass filter is typically constructed by taking the voltage off the resistor
in the series RLC circuit:
33
We can calculate the transfer function:
Vo R
H(ω) = = 1
vi R + ̂(ωL − ωC )
Which gives the following plot. Comparing it to the ideal band-pass filter trans-
fer function you can see how it acts as one.
The filters passes signals of a frequency between it’s two half power frequencies,
centred at ω0 :
1
ω0 = √
LC
This filter is a series resonant circuit, and so it follows the equations from that
section.
Band-Stop Filters
A band-stop filter is typically constructed by taking the voltage off the LC pair
in a series RLC circuit:
34
We can calculate the transfer function:
1
Vo ̂(ωL − ωC )
H(ω) = = 1
vi R + ̂(ωL − ωC )
Which gives the following plot. Comparing it to the ideal band-stop filter trans-
fer function you can see how it acts as one.
35
They cannot amplify the signal, as in the maximum gain is 1.
Active filters are made of resistors, capacitors, and op amps which fix many of
these issues. Active filters require a source of power to operate, and to amplify
signals.
Where components selected for Zi and Zf determine whether the filter is low/high-
pass, however one of them must be reactive.
The transfer function would be:
Vo Zf
H(ω) = =−
Vi Zi
A particular example of a low-pass filter could be:
36
The transfer function is the same as the passive low-pass filter but with a con-
stant gain:
Rf 1
H(ω) =
Ri 1 + ̂ωCf Rf
Where the cutoff frequency is:
1
ωc =
Rf Cf
37
The transfer function is the same as the passive high-pass filter but with a
constant gain:
̂ωCi Rf
H(ω) = −
1 + ̂ωCi Ri
... and the cutoff frequency is:
1
ωc =
Ri Ci
Fully worked with op amps, the circuit looks like the following:
We can calculate the transfer function for this circuit by multiplying together
the individual transfer functions:
Vo Rf 1 ̂ωC2 R
H(ω) = =−
Vi Ri 1 + ̂ωC1 R 1 + ̂ωC2 R
A plot of which is:
38
The low pass filter sets the upper bound ω2 :
1
ω2 =
RC1
The high pass filter sets the lower bound ω1 :
1
ω1 =
RC2
... additionally:
√
w0 = ω1 ω2
B = ω2 − ω1
ω0
Q=
B
We can determine the passband gain (K) to be:
Rf ω2
K=
Ri ω1 + ω2
39
Fully worked with op amps, the circuit looks like the following:
We can calculate the transfer function for this circuit by multiplying together
the individual transfer functions:
Vo Rf 1 ̂ωC2 R
H(ω) = =− − −
Vi Ri 1 + ̂ωC1 R 1 + ̂ωC2 R
A plot of which is:
40
Chapter 15: Introduction to the Laplace Trans-
form
In AC domain, we used ̂ω to replace differentiation. This process however
only worked for sinusoidal input functions. We want a method to turn any
arbitrary input function into a domain where differentiation is replaced with
some simpler operation. For this purpose we use the Laplace Transform because
of the following property:
L {f 0 (t)} = sF (s) − f (0)
d
... and similar rules apply for higher order derivatives. In a sense, dt =⇒
s· in Laplace Domain. Similarly integration with respect to time is replaced
with division by s in Laplace Domain. Laplace Domain is when all the circuit
elements are rewritten by applying the Laplace Transform to all their elements.
Some notable features of the edge behaviour is:
Initial Value: f (0) = lim sF (s)
s→∞
41
Resistors in Laplace Domain
Since:
v(t) = Ri(t)
... then:
V (s) = RI(s)
... once you take the Laplace Transform of both sides:
Since:
di(t)
v(t) = L
dt
42
... then:
1 i(0− )
I(s) = V (s) +
sL s
... once you take the Laplace Transform of both sides and rearrange. There are
two ways to realize this in a circuit:
43
Capacitors in Laplace Domain
Since:
dv(t)
i(t) = C
dt
... then:
1 v(0− )
V (s) = I(s) +
sC s
... once you take the Laplace Transform of both sides and rearrange. There are
two ways to realize this in a circuit:
44
Impedance is defined as usual as the ratio of V (s) to I(s), and so assuming zero
initial conditions it is:
Resistor: Z(s) = R
Inductor: Z(s) = sL
1
Capacitor: Z(s) =
sC
In Laplace Domain we can use all the same circuit analysis techniques like
in DC analysis:
Node voltage analysis
Mesh current analysis
Thevenin/Norton
Voltage/Current Division
Multiplication in Laplace Domain is the same as convolution in time domain:
Z ∞
v(t) = i(τ )h(t − τ )dτ = i(t) ∗ h(t)
−∞
45
When two loops with or without contacts between them affect each other
through the magnetic field generated by one of them,they are said to be mag-
netically coupled. When two inductors are in close proximity to each other, the
magnetic flux caused by current in one coil links with the other coil, inducing a
voltage in the latter. This is called mutual inductance.
Given some inductor with some current, the magnetic flux (φ) can be through
of as:
By Faraday’s law:
dφ
v=N
dt
... where N is the number of coils in the inductor. Note that the flux is caused
by a change in current and so:
dφ di
v=N
di dt
If we define L = N dφ
di , then we get:
dφ di di
v= N =⇒ v = L
di dt dt
... which is the relationship we already know about the voltage across an induc-
tor. This inductance L is called self-inductance.
Now we consider two inductors with self-inductances L1 and L2 , being in
close proximity to each other. Note also that one inductor no current, and so
has no magnetic flux.
46
As you can see, some of the flux of inductor 1 acts only on itself (φ11 can be
thought of as flux from 1 onto 1). Then some of the flux interacts with the other
inductor (φ12 ). These fluxes must add to the total flux from the first inductor
which is φ1 :
φ1 = φ11 + φ12
Now consider the voltages across either inductor:
dφ1 di1 di1
v 1 = N1 = L1
di1 dt dt
Similarly:
dφ12 di1
v 2 = N2
di1 dt
If we define a new type inductance called mutual inductance as:
dφ12
M21 = N2
di1
Then:
di1
v2 = M21
dt
M21 is the mutual inductance of coil 2 with respect to coil 1.
Through the exact same process on the following circuit:
47
We can conclude that:
di2
v1 = M12
dt
It will be later shown that:
M21 = M12 = M
... and we define M as the mutual inductance between two inductors. This is
the ability of one inductor to induce a voltage across a neighbouring inductor,
measured in Henrys (H). We say that these inductors a mutually coupled which
can only occur when the inductors are at close proximity, and that the sources
are time-varying.
The polarity of the voltage on a single inductor is done by the passive sign
convention. The polarity of the voltages across two magnetically coupled circuits
is dependent on the orientation and physical winding of each inductor. The dot
convention is used to show the polarities. If current enters the dotted terminal
of one coil, the reference polarity of the mutual voltage in the second coil is
positive at the dotted terminal, visually that is:
48
Inductors in series can also be mutually coupled, and can then be replaced
by just a single equivalent inductor, as follows:
49
Series-Aiding Connection
Leq = L1 + L2 + 2M
Series-Opposing Connection
Leq = L1 + L2 − 2M
50
13.4: Linear Transformers
A transformer is a circuit element which takes advantage of mutual inductance.
Generally it is a four terminal device comprising two or more magnetically
coupled coils. The following is a general schematic of a linear inductor:
The coil with the voltage source is said to be primary while the coil with
the load is said to be secondary. The resistances are included to account for the
losses in the coils. The transformer is said to be linear if the coils are wound
on magnetically linear material, meaning the magnetic permeability is constant.
Most materials are magnetically linear. In other words, flux is proportional to
the current in its windings.
The function of transformers is described in the next section, for now we
would like to be able to transform a linear transformer into one of two configu-
rations.
We want to transform the following initial circuit, and values:
51
Where:
La = L1 − M
Lb = L2 − M
Lc = M
... or if the dots are on opposite ends use −M
Q .
The second configuration is called the circuit:
Where:
L1 L2 − M 2
La =
L2 − M
L1 L2 − M 2
Lb =
L1 − M
L1 L2 − M 2
Lc =
M
... or if the dots are on opposite ends use −M .
52
2. Coupling coefficient is equal to unity (k = 1), this implies
p
M = L1 L2
N2 V2 I1
n= = =
N1 V1 I2
Notice current and voltage are inversely proportional to conserve energy. There
are two simple rules to decide the sign of n:
1. If V1 and V2 are both positive or both negative at the dotted terminals,
use +n. Otherwise use −n.
2. If I1 and I2 both enter into or both leave the dotted terminals, use +n.
Otherwise use −n.
53
Importantly the equivalent impedance (Zeq ) felt by the source V̄ in the
circuit above is:
ZL
Zeq = 2
n
Finally, we look at how to transform the following ideal transformer circuit
(which contains sources on either side):
We can either transform the circuit into an equivalent circuit from the perspec-
tive of V̄s1 :
54
13.6: Ideal Autotransformers
Autotransformers are made of a single continuous winding with a connection
point called a tap between the primary and secondary sides.
Step-down Autotransformer
V̄1 N1 + N2 N1
= =1+
V̄2 N1 N2
55
Step-up Autotransformer
V̄1 N1
=
V̄2 N1 + N2
The main difference between an transformer and an autotransformer is that
the inductors are both conductively and magnetically coupled. Electrical isola-
tion is not possible with an autotransformer.
56
A spinning magnet called the rotor induces an AC voltage with frequency ω on
each inductor a, b, c (a0 , b0 , c0 are their respective grounds). The voltages a, b, c
are out of phase by 120◦ due to their geometric position around the circle.
There are two possible implementations of this generator in a circuit.
57
1. Y −connected source:
2. ∆−connected source:
58
There are two possible sequences of peak voltages (also called the phase
sequences), either:
1. Positive Sequence:
a → b → c → a → b → c → a → ...
2. Negative Sequence:
a → c → b → a → c → b → a → ...
Loads can also be in three-phase form, and just like sources, the can be
either in Y or ∆ configuration.
1. Y −connected three-phase load.
59
This type of load is said to be in balanced if:
Z1 = Z2 = Z3 = ZY
You can use the following equation to convert a balanced three-phase load
between forms:
Z∆ = 3ZY
60
You can also convert between ∆ and Y sources as in the following image
and equations:
Vp
Van = √ ∠ − 30◦
3
Vp
Vbn = √ ∠ − 150◦
3
Vp
Vcn = √ ∠90◦
3
There are thus four possible combinations of three-phase sources and three-
phase loads (source then load):
1. Y − Y connection.
2. Y − ∆ connection.
3. ∆ − ∆ connection.
4. ∆ − Y connection.
The following four sections of this chapter look at each of these connections
in detail.
In the following sections we define the phase voltages/current as well at the
line voltages/currents for all the different configurations. The phase voltages
are the voltages between the lines a, b, c and n in the Y configuration. The line
voltages refer to the voltage differences between the three lines. Phase current
is the current in each phase of the source or load. Line current is the current
in each transmission line.
In general, in a balanced three-phase circuit, the neutral line can be ignored
since the voltage across it is 0 and the current through it is 0.
61
12.3: Balanced Y-Y Connection
The following is a general Y − Y three phase circuit:
62
12.4: Balanced Y-D Connection
The following is a general Y − D three phase circuit:
63
Ib = Ia ∠ − 120◦
Ic = Ia ∠120◦
You can also solve these kinds of circuits by transforming the load into a Y
topology.
64
12.6: Balanced D-Y Connection
The following is a general D − Y three phase circuit:
p = 3Vp Ip cos(θ)
65
... where θ is the lag of the current behind corresponding phase voltages.
This is a time independent quantity, and it true regardless of the topology
of the load.
The following are other formulas:
1. Average power per phase:
Pp = Vp Ip cos(θ)
Qp = Vp Ip sin(θ)
Sp = Vp Ip
Sp = Pp + ̂Qp = Vp Ip∗
3Vp2 √
S = 3Sp = 3Vp Ip∗ = 3Ip2 Zp = ∗
= P + ̂Q = 3VL IL ∠θ
Zp
66
2. Solve using AC and DC techniques separately by ”turning off” one source
at a time.
3. Use the superposition principle of a linear system to add all the results
back together.
All of the theory and methods to compute the Fourier Series of a function is in
my MTH312 notes. We do it only slightly differently here:
To compute the Fourier series f (t) of a function:
∞
X
f (t) = a0 + an cos(nω0 t) + bn sin(nω0 t)
n=1
... where:
2π
ω0 =
T
Z T
1
a0 = f (t)dt
T 0
Z T
2
an = f (t) cos(nω0 t)dt
T 0
Z T
2
bn = f (t) sin(nω0 t)dt
T 0
We will also show a new way to represent it.
Given some Fourier series of a function (neither even nor odd), there will be
a corresponding cos and sin term with the same frequency. We can thus rewrite
the Fourier series in amplitude-phase form as:
∞
X
f (t) = a0 + An cos(nω0 t + φn )
n=1
... where: p
An = a2n + b2n
−1 bn
φn = − tan
an
... which could also be thought of as a complex number:
An = an − ̂bn = An ∠φn
67
Now that we know this we can visually represent each term in the amplitude-
phase form of the Fourier Series as an AC voltage source, as in:
68
17.5 Average Power and RMS Values
Given some periodic input in amplitude-phase form:
∞
X
v(t) = Vdc + Vn cos(nω0 t − θn )
n=1
∞
X
i(t) = Idc + Im cos(mω0 t − φm )
m=1
69
...the average power absorbed by the circuit (P ) is:
∞
1X
P = Vdc Idc + Vn In cos(θn − φn )
2 n=1
The average power absorbed by a resistor with a periodic current input f (t) is:
2
P = RFrms
Conclusion
This concludes the content in this course. I hope these notes were helpful! Good
luck in the exam!
- Adam Szava
70