0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 673 views138 pagesYEGUL F., Bathing in The Roman World
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
BATHING IN THE
ROMAN WORLD
Fikret YegiilDigitized by the Internet Archive
in 2023 with funding from
Kahle/Austin Foundation
[Link]
BATHING IN THE ROMAN WORLD
In Bathing in the Roman World, Fikret Yegiil examines the social
and cultural aspects of one of the key Roman institutions. Guiding
the reader through the customs, rituals, and activities associated with
public bathing, Yegiil traces the origins and development of baths and
bathing customs and analyzes the sophisticated technology and archi-
tecture of bath complexes, which were among the most imposing of
all Roman building types. He also examines the reception of bathing
throughout the classical world and the transformation of bathing cul-
ture across three continents im Byzantine and Christian societies. The
volume concludes with an epilogue on bathing and cleanliness in post-
classical Europe, revealing the changes and continuities in culture that
have made public bathing a viable phenomenon even in the modern
era. Richly illustrated and written in an accessible manner, this book is
geared to undergraduates and graduate students for use in courses on
Roman architecture, archaeology, civilization, and social and cultural
history.
* Fikrer Yegill is professor of history of art and architecture at the Uni-
versity of California, Santa Barbara. A scholar of Roman architecture,
he has been a member of the Harvard Sardis Excavations in Turkey
and the Ohio State University Isthmia Excavations in Greece. Yeguil is
the author of articles and books on Roman architecture, notably Baths
and Bathing in Classical Antiquity, which received the Alice D. Hitch:
cock Award from the Society of Architectural Historians in 1994. He
is working on a book on Roman architecture and urbanism.BATHING IN THE
ROMAN WORLD
FIKRET YEGUL
University of California, Santa Barbara
we CAMBRIDGE
UNIVERSITY PRESSCONTENTS
. Meltourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore,
Dect, Drala, Toalkyer
32 Avenue of the Americas, New York, sv 9001 )-47), 088
sete Cambie a
Informanon on this ule: [Link] ceply7Bogznsqueas
© Cambradar Univeroty Press 20re
This pubbhcancm ison copyright. Subject to statutory exception
and to the provasone of felevant callective lcemaang Agreements,
mo reprodkacteon of any part may take place wahout the srien
petiiewuna of Cambradge Caccersity Press
Preface page xi
First published soro ‘
1 Introduction 1
Protea! the United States of Ameena
A atta vec for this pbsbcstiot ts sda frome the Beitoal Library 2 Populetiey of Roman Bathing Colvere 5
Library oof Comprens Cataloging it Prebbicateon datas 3 Bathing Rituals and Activities i
Yew Fret K., 1941 Time of Bathing "
Racheng in the Roman worl / Pikrer Yewail Routine of Bathing m
en i Bathing, Exercise, and Games 14
Insts Iesboge aphaal referees ama ene ;
sab 978--sih seein (pbk) Bathing Order 17
1, Bathing contoues ~ Rome. 2. Water-ose ~ Social aspects = Rome. 5. Hygiene = Entertainment in Baths 18
Home. 4, Public baths - Rome. 5, Rome - Social lie and cistorms, 6. Baths, Eating and Drinking in Baths 19
ine ae ee Seneca’s Description of Public Bachs 20
Wetalgouasers dees 200901710 4 Critics of Roman Bathing: Ethical and Moral
isan grfho-sa0-Ayoys-s Hardback Concerns aa
Ian gions Paperback
ee Yearning for Republican Simplicity and Criticism of
Cambodpe Unreeraty Pree haere repomubiliy for the perustence ot Luxury a3
accuracy of Uits for extemal or [Link] Intemet Web sites referred to in Did Roman Baths Encourage Uncouth Behavior? 25
Hove pads vtneoes aml chews emt ganar ares any come on wach Wels sit .
idm ackuce pas eee Excesses of Eating and Drinking 26
Sex, Nudity, Men, Women 27
The Roman Bath as a Democraric Institution MCONTENTS
5 Origins and Development of Roman Baths and
Literary Evidence
The Greek Bath and the Greek Gymnasium
Farm Traditions of Rural Italy
Baleae and Thermae
Thi
nal Baths and Spas
Archacological and Physical Evidence
Farly Examples from Pompeii, Campania, and
Fregellae
The Pompeian/Campanian Bath Type and Its
Dissemination
Baths in Rome, Ostia, and Tivoli
Rome
Ostia
Tivoli
Baths of Hippias: A Neighborhood Bath
6 er Supply Systems of Roma
Baths
The Heating of Roman Baths
Floor Hearing Systems and the Hypocaust
Sergius rata and the Origins «
Wall Hi
Tiles with Nipples (Tegulae Mammarae) anc
Box-Tiles (Tubuli
he Hypacaust
ing of Water and B
ines Alvec
Laconica and Steam Bathing
Water Supply Systems
7 Architecture of Roman Baths
The Thermae of Rome
The
aths of Agrippa, First the Imperial
Thermac
What Is ay Bad as Nero, What Is as Good as His
«of Trajan ~ The Maturation of a Type
rate of Caracalla: The Flagship of the Inyperial
Thermae
The Great Costs of Building an Imperial Thermac
4c
40
41
45
49
CONTENTS
Lite in the Great Then
Gymnastic Uses of the Therma
Roman Attitudes toward Gymnastics and the
Gymnasium
Athletic Clubs in Thern
Libraries and Classrooms in Therniac
The Immersive Sensory Experience of Ther
8 Provincial Baths of North Africa
Imperial Thermae in North Africa
Hadrianic Baths in Lepeis Ma
Antonine Thermae in Carthage
Large East Baths at Mactar
The Large Baths at Djemila and the Baths of
Licinius at Dougga
The Baths of Julia Memmia at Bulla Regia — An
Example of the Half-Axial Type
Small Baths with Creative Plans
The Small Baths at Cherchel and the South Baths at
Karanis
The Small Central &
The Hunting Baths
Functional Forr
The Small Baths at Thenae
The Baths of Pompeianus at Oued Athr
1a
ths
|
pad
is M Purely
nla
and Bathing in Asia Minor: The Gymna
a
9 Baths
Tradi
The Bath-Gymnasium Complex: A New Architectural
Type
The Baths of V
ergilius Capito at Miletus: An Barly
Bath-Gy sium
The Harbor Bath-Gyranasium at Ephesus: A Grand
Establishment
The Vedius Bath-Gyn
Bath-Gyrnt
perial Halls and the “Marble Cow
Sardis
An Unusual
Bath-Gym
BatheGym
The Baths of F
Arrange
at Ephesus and the
sium at Sarclis
asi
nd Awkward Plan: The Bast
Ephesus and the
Alexandria Troas
120
16
136
140
tat
4
45
146
147
147
150
1st
158
168viii CONTENTS
The Barh-Gymnasium during Late Antiquity
Baths of the Southern Hilly Regions: Lycia,
hylia, and Pisidia
The Baths of Rough Cilicia
“Hall Type” Baths and Their Social Significance
Bathing and Baths in the East during the Late Antique
and Byza radigms af Social Use
Thi
Periods: New
aths of Constantineple
The Thermae of Zeuxippos
The Neighborhood Trik
‘Church, and the Bath
Roman Baths of Antioch
“Somewhat to Qur Dismay, It (Is) Another Bath”:
ath €
Bath |
NM Baths in Syria as Ay
aradigm
The Mansion, the
yents of a New Social
Some Thoughts on the Sources of the New Social
Meaning in Bath Design and Use
Some Large Baths in Syria
Transformations of Roman Baths
Christian and Is!
mic Societies
Christianity and the Changing Bathing Culture: “He
Who Has Bathed in Christ Has No Need of a
Second Bath
Whar Christianity Really Objected to in Bathing
Alowséa or the State of Being Unwashed
Early Islamic Baths in Syria; A Seamless Tradition
An Islamic Palace Bath: Khirbat aleM
The Bath as a Measurable Gatheriny
Islamic Sock
fiat
Baths, Baching, and Cleanliness in Postelassical
E
Baths in the Middle Ages: Agents of Hyys
* Aesthetic Promiscuity*
Bath Houses, Flee from Them or You Shall D
Water asa Har
Matter of Appearance
Western Christianity and Latter-Day Alousta
‘opean Societies
Cleanliness as a
1! Element ar
8
18s
wey
186
188
189
ty
194
199
CONTENTS
Rediscovery of Public Bathing,
Oriental Baths and Orientalism
Selected Bibliography
Glossary
IndexPREFACE
Within the shick seally of the bathhouse, we were cut off
completely from the outside world... Naked and peacefil
together, able to be ourselves,
(Lindsey Davis, A Body in the Bathhouse, 2001)
‘When Beatrice Reh! offered me the opportunity to write a broadly
conceived book on bathing in the Roman world, the fascination
with the subject was too great to refuse. 1 wanted to ahandon
baths but baths did not want to abandon me, I think | was also
fascinated because contrary to my previous studies this work was
not about the archaeological complexities and technical details of
baths but intended to be a general and generous approach to the
subject. Foremost, it offered me a chance to cast my net wide and
present my knowledge in the form of a narrative for the enjoyment
of beginners and professionals alike.
In this new work I look back to my previous work on baths
and the culture of bathing in the ancient world and I look forward
to new examples, ideas, and departures. | am content to re-tread
familiar ground (as covered in my Baths and Bathing in the Clas:
sical World and more than a dozen articles beyond it) but pleased
to venture into new horizons. For example, as my core convictions
abour the origins, nature and development of baths and bathing
xiPREFACE
remain the same, my views of “women and baths” have been gath-
ered, reconsidered and focused in this study; my conceptions on
the democratic nature of Roman baths and their importance as.
“social levelers” remain unchanged, but the nature and meaning of
democracy cast in the context of a public bath have been enlarged
and explicated. The Stabian Baths of Pompeii and the Thermae
of Caracalla of Rome and a host of others are too important to
omit, but the early second century Republican Baths at Fregellae,
a Latin colony in Latium, recently excavated under the direstion
cof Filippo Coarelli, promises to open a new chapter in the Ital-
ian origins of the hot bath, An equally exciting new discovery is
the near-perfectly preserved extensive spa-city at Alliono! in the
heart of Anarolia (near Pergamon) that challenges the supremacy
‘of Baiae as the incomparable thermal establishment of the Roman
world. These two establishments, in my opinion, are the two most
important additions to the archaeology and scholarship on baths in
the second half of the twentieth century, Then there are the superb
paintings of monumental nude bathing women from an Antonine
hath in the Esquiline region in Rome only very recently rescued
from deep archacological storage - a joy to behold handsomely
exhibited ar Palazzo Massimo,
The title of this book appears to be restricted to bathing in
the “Roman™ world, but the narrative heeds its own momentum
to reach out to the post-classical world in the last two chapters
and includes the continuities and transformations of bathing cul-
ture of carly Christian and Islamic communities and concepts of
baths, bathing and cleanliness in European communities from the
Medieval-Renaissance era to now. | was as much intrigued to fol-
low the bathing delights and antics of Martial’s characters as 1
was of Lady Montagu’s fascinating accounts of Turkish baths and
women in eighteenth century Constantinople Istanbul. It is hard to
ignore the East versus West controversy in customs of bathing of to
hide pure delight at the splendid world of baths created by the Ori-
entalist painters even when their shimmering, settings populated bby
exotic Muslim bathers tell more about the painter's fiction than the
reahey of his subjects.
Although the focus of this study is the social habit of bathing,
the connection berween the act and its architectural setting is insep-
arable. Bathing implies baths, Hence the considerable attention
accorded to the architecture of individual examples, Itts with pity 1
PREFACE
realize that some of the close architectural descriptions could not be
accompanied with plans and drawings — some of my readers would
be familiar with the unfortunate economic restrictions imposed on
academic publications. In order to maintain a sense of flowing nar-
rative we decided not to give specific notes except when quotations
are inchuded. There is, however, a complete and up-to-date bibliog-
faphy, | also refrained from giving the customary list of thanks and
acknowledgements. Those whom 1 owe my knowledge and thanks
know it: to all of you who encouraged me to proceed with this
study and made me perceive what is important and enjoyable from
the original conception to the last efforts of editing and improving
my words, | owe gratitude. And I send thanks to colleagues and
institutions who generously shared their visual material as a matter
‘of friendship and courtesy.
Bathing in public as a cultural expression and personal plea-
sure becomes meaningful through the opposing tendencies of pri-
vacy and intimacy engendered by architecture, and by exten-
sion, through the co-existence af contradictory but interdependent
worlds of reality and escape, work and play. As Falco and his
friend knew, “naked and peaceful... within the thick walls of the
bathhouse,” inhaling the steamy air and listening to the murmur-
ing water and whispering vaults, one might seize the chance to be
oneself in the baths and perhaps glimpse hat is important.
This story of baths and bathing was enjoyable to write; | hope
it will be enjoyable to read. As the bards of old Anatolia, where
I come from, used to conclude their tales, three apples fell from
the sky, one for the teller of this story, the other for his listeners
(readers), and the third, shall we say, for all those in the future who
will take it a step further.
Fikret Yegul
Santa Barbara, CA
July 2009
xiii1
INTRODUCTION
or most of us, bathing is abour being clean; it is a hygienic
concern, We normally bathe at home, occasionally enjoy-
ing soaking in the bathtub, but more commonly taking a
daily shower, which is quicker and, we think, more effi-
cient. Bathing is also a highly private affair; rarely de we share a
shower or bath with another person. Ot course, there are places
and cultures we know or hear about where bathing is more than
just washing, such as the Finnish sauna, the Japanese sento, and
the Turkish harman, where one spends a fairly long time in the
bath, often in the company of others, following an elaborate and
time-honored ritual - in those situations bathing is a social, cultural
experience.
In the Finnish sauna one first spends time sweating in a steam
chamber, traditionally constructed of aromatic cedar wood, where
temperatures can exceed 8o-90'C. Then one plunges into a pool
‘of literally ice-cold water. The Japanese bath, taken in a simple,
small tub in the company of one’s family or close friends, is a
part of the relaxing social routine of the evening, although the
practice has deep religious roots. A similar social setting is sought
in the modern Ameri rly Californian, ritual of the
hot tub or the Jacuzzi. Taking place cither outdoors or indoors,
and in anything from a simple rustic wooden tub to a high-techBATHING IN THE ROMAN WORLD
ical whirlpools and mood lights, the
Jacuzzi experience is about xation and socializing more than
hygiene, Lately, spas have becon ty fashionable, Admission to
4 spa is often offered as a part of a complete package in
jon resort. The spa experience involves a prescribed routine of
immersion in mineral waters (normally created by adding mineral
salts to artificially hi = the sulfurous odor of many nat-
tural thermal sources is repulsive to the modern nose), massage,
cosmetics, and aromatherapy. It is expensive, A more traditional,
and perhaps more authentic, version of the resort-spa is the natural
thermal bath, found in sites such as the famous Bath (ancient Aquae
fiberglass pool with mech:
vaca-
Sulis), England, the elegant setting of many a Victorian novel, Both
the historical and the modern spa, however, combine a culture
of relaxation and recreation with hygienic and alleged therapeutic
benefits,
OF all past peoples and civilizations, the Romans had the most
extraordinary devotion t baths and bathing ~ and their devotion
was the most thoroughly rooted in their life and culture, Asa rule,
Romans bathed daily, and spent a considerable part of the day
1 their pleasantly ~ uptuously ~ appointed public baths.
Roman baths went far beyond meeting the normal hygienic fune-
tions of washing, They provided facilities for sports and recreatic
massage, body culture, and relaxation = and for social
fram idle gossip to business discussion ch like a club oF o
included educational
rereourse
m
center, Sor
such as libras
ras for the exhibition of works of art, like a
Bathing in public was a central event in the daily lives
‘of the Romans. It would not be an exaggeration co say that at the
height of their empire, public baths embodied the ideal Re
cof urban living.
The popularity of public baths as social and cultural institu
tions is reflected in the har iths known from weit:
wwated) in
Roman cities and settlements, One could claim that, with the pos
sible exception of t ths than all other
building types, By the end of the first century 1 just
before the establishment of the Empire, Rome had nearly 260 small
baths; by the fourth century C.e,, two urban censu
s well as colonnades,
» and exe
nh way
sources or actually preserved (and sometimes ex
ples, there were mc
INTRODUCTION
(Notitia Urbis Regionum, ¢. 434-57. and Curiosun Urbis Romac
Regionum, 457-403) record their numbers at a staggering 856 plus
to of 11 thermae, which were exceptionally large and luxurious
bathing complexes. Of course, there is some variance in the num-
bers given in these sources; still, it is clear that Rome, a city of a
million ar more, the empire's capital and its center of power, affered
denizens an exceptionally wide variety of large and small baths
to choose from, The record from other large Roman cities, patchy
as it is, supports the news from Rome: Constantinople (modern
Istanbul) in the early fifth century had 8 thermac and 15 small
baths (Novitia Urbis Constantinopolitanae). We do not have an
ficial record from Antioch-on-the-Orontes, a large center in the
offi
Eastern Mediterranean, but John Malalas, a mid-sixth-century his-
an, randomly names a dozen or so, though none of them has
been identified among the six baths uncovered in the city during
the 1932-3 excavations. Even a modest veterans’ colony such as
Timgad in North Africa, with a population of no more than five or
six thousand, could support seven or eight baths, a few of which
were quite large and elaborate.
A community’s pride and delight in its baths was often reflected
in the boasting of its citizens about the numbers and quality of
its baths, Despite its rherorical tone, the declaration by the sophist
Aclius Aristides (a second-century poet and political thinker) that
his home town Smyma, one of the largest Roman ports of the
Aegean, “had so many baths that you would be at a loss to know
where to bathe,” is typical and probably quite true (Ael, Arist,
15.252), Conversely, the closing down of the public baths by high
administrative officers, sometimes by the emperor himself, was con-
sidered the severest of the punishments that could be meted our to
a city, When the citizens of Antioch rioted in 487 Cr. in reaction
to newly imposed taxes, the violence, especially the breaking of the
imperial images, started at the baths. The revocation of the city’s
official rank as the “metropolis of Syria” (obviously a much coveted
honor) and the closing down of its baths were the most humiliar-
ing penalties imposed (John Chrysostom, On the Statues, 14.2-6,
17.2; Libanius, Orations, 22.2-7). Perhaps the best testimony to
the importance of public bathing in the lives of Romans is this sim-
ple, artless passage describing a daily visit to the baths, taken from
a schoolbay’s exercise book: “I must go and have my bath. Yes,BATHING IN THE ROMAN WORLD
I leave. I get myself some towels and follow my servant.
tch up with the others who are going to the baths
Hlave a good bath!
the
it's time
1
Hand ©
{say to them one and all, ‘How are y«
dermeneumata Ps, Do
cipzig, 892, raf.)
* Corpus
Have a good supper!"
Glossariorum Latinorum, ed, G, Goerz,
POPULARITY OF ROMAN BATHING
CULTURE
oth beginners and specialists in ancient studies aften ask
why bathing was so important to Roman society = why
were there so many baths in town and country? What
ans had in th
accounts for the obvious delight Re
baths and the intense popularity of public bathing? There a
y and definite answers to these deceptively simple questions,
Like certain sports that are intensely popular with groups
and nor others (such as American football in the United States
and soccer in virtually all the rest of the world), because of their
deep roots in a culture, barhs were popular with Romans because
bathing had become a daily habit = and the more they liked it the
more likable it beeames the effect fortified the cause. Bathing had
become a significant part of their lives, an institution rooted in the
rhythm and structure of their day, ens the very concept of
time, The Roman day normally reserved the afternoon for leisure
Already, by the end of the Republic, spending the latter part of the
afternoon, after a light lunch and siesta, in the public baths had
bee life and national
identity,
Still, why did bathing beco
Roman writers, such as Martial and S
their admiration and detailed in their description of the baths, do
eno
need
adition, a comforting part of urk
eat
¢ a daily habit
ca, tho
the first place?
ih profuse inBATHING IN THE D
should we expect them to state
not f
ns
us. Instead of seeking f
what to them was ¢ specific reas
for such complex cultural phenomena, it may be more profitabl
to consider a multitude of factors all together
The first and most important is the pleasure factor. At its m
basic, bathing is a physically and psychologically satisfying, plea:
surable activity. W air and water relax the body and
the ience itself n wate
here, the arom
oked the awak
wment Romans called solv
f perfumed unguents, the in
of the senses, a state of ©
Nowhere do we sense the sheer enjoyment and material delight ¢
bathing more than in the historical re-creations of the world of
RK n baths of Sir Lawrens Alma-Tadema (18 ions here
depicting, for example, playful young women in the gleaming mar
ble pool of an imaginary women’s bath (sce Figure 1). The sense
of warmth alone must have been an extremely power
to the creation of a feeling of relaxation, cc and well-being,
A treshly
century CE. w
athed person felt light and optimistic. Suctonius, a first
the best time to ask Vespasia ately after his
bath (Suet., Ve A dedica
m a late fifth
century ¢.t. bath im Syria is typical ir g that the bath
could bring “pleasure and happiness tire oo y
Indeed, there are a group of inscriptions and epigrams, cspecially
from the late Roman period, that allude to the strange and won
drous ability of baths to deliver the bather from pain and w«
and cre a sense of delight. with the natural spn, the
baths are considered as the dwelling places of Ny
in Greek, t
Wt bath: could confer os On a Ww
munity, it was naturally expers ec. The cozy
warmth of the apparent world of classless mudity
encouraged frendshir y. For several h
nok the indiv
least, mat of his shelll ar
him a place
rs. Sh
hers, especially
in a situation im which men
being and below,
"ULARITY OF ROMAN BATHING CULTURE
Enhancing this sense of delight and pleasure was, of course,
s material world created by p
baths. Roman
the sumptu
baths, espe
luxury of th
lly the imperial thermae, were well known for the
Glow mms of there 1
‘bles, intricate mosaics, stucco oF
ind decorative statu
nstitute almost an independentBATHING IN THE ROMAN WORLD
genre in ture. Martial, a first-century ©. poet and
of social satire, referred a friend to the Baths of Erruseus, a
II luxury establishment in Rome, in glowing terms: “If you de
¢ bathe in the therwndlac (small baths) of Etruseus, you will die
hed, Oppianus!” (Martial, 6.42), He admired the mildness
of its waters and the serenity of its interiors, but most of all the
jored marbles originating from distant lands,
ary poet, was more florid in his praise of the
same baths: “Toil and care, depart! I sing of the baths that sparkle
with bright marbles! ... Come, then, ye nymphs of the waters, turn
your clean faces and bind up your glass-green hair with tender wine
ots, your naked hodies as you emerge from the deep springs, and
torture your satyr-lovers with the sight!" (Statius, Siluae, 1.4
nymphs Statius was admiring were not the usual sex
Roman society; they were mythic creatures of natural sprin
dwelt on the Seven Hills of Rome and mingled in the waters of
its famous aqueducts, especially the ewo that sceved the Baths of
Etruscus - the pure Aqua Virgo, excellent for swimming in, and the
chilly Ag
Naturally, there is some exaggeration in these poetic architec-
Among the baths of Rome,
ally those located in poorer neighborhood, some no doubt
nd ill-kept and offered few luxuries of the kind
mple archaeological evidence bears our that
es, in gene ‘After all,
the taste for private and public lixury and extravagant display of
the critical concern with it) was a growing character:
Repubhean ane Impernal Roman culture, This was the
J when rich Romans were intent on decorating th
anid he
ess of its mult
%, a COMtEMpK
shy
al sire
reia, born in the snowy hills north of the city.
tural ence ndreds of small ith
espe
were ill-cesigned
suing by poets, Still,
praises of bath usu
ule
|. were well fe
istic in lat
ir theaters,
rble columns,
id on.
nes with rare, imported n
acquiring, %
ctimes pil
ndering if they cou
art and sculpture from Greece to displ
1, priceless objects of
ay in their dwellings as syrm
bols of social exclusivity and power, Public baths, dubbed “people's
palaces” b reflection of this
modern criti¢s, were only a partic
ral trend.
we
Hut there was alse
life wi
jificant difference. The wealth of private
vs public baths brought this bounty to
ble world of baths a
5 for the eves of a
the masses. The hixuirious and pleas forded
the gre han popu
ions a weleame appa
their overcrowded and cramped living conditions and the dusty
POPULARITY OF ROMAN BATHING CULTURE
streets fe
a few hours a day
many, it was their only opportun
houses and villas of the very wealth
ns had surprisingly sparse bathing facilities - often a small
wimber next to the kitchen, sharing the kitchen stove ~ of ne
all. This was especially true for the multistory t nents (intsulae)
that housed the greater portions of urban populations in the larger
cities, Thus, we should ren her that along with their variety
of social niceties, an important fi in baths" popularity was
that they served the functional and hygienic needs of washing for
many and made available for them
privately afford
Another factor thar helps account for the popularity of baths
is the well-entrenched belief in the ancient world that baths were
good for health. Bathing, fro
serious therapeutic measur
nd bathe in style; moreover, for
¥ to bathe at all, BE:
n urban luxury most could not
1 its earliest history, was considered a
nid received full support and author-
fairly detailed regimen of bathing in
ewarm waters for the treatment of a variety of
if been worked out by Greek and Roman doctors and
health specialists. Taking a cure at natural hot springs or thermo-
mineral baths was considered particularly efficacious, Some of the
most popular resorts in the Roman world centered on such thermal
sources, Ina world where effective ways of combating disease were
still limited and primitive and the average life expectancy was rarely
more than yo=35 years, the remedial and preventive potential of
baths was highly regarded. Furthermore, light forms of physical
exercise, rooted in ancient Greck gymnastics bur almost always
accompanying bathing, were a simple and effective daily method
of keeping fit and healthy for all age groups.
Finally, there is also a hard economic explanation, Baths were
builtin such large numbers because running a public bath was asen-
sible and lucrative business proposition. Advances in by
nology (as well as water supply systems), especially the widespread
use of Roman concrete, the primary material for the typically
vaulted construction of baths, made building even large and com-
plex bath structures relatively easy and cheap. These adi
economic and technical, encouraged the popular establishm
small, neighborhood baths (balzeae) across the dense fabric of
neexts (see the following ch
I this
ity from ancient medicine,
hot, cold, and Iu
ailments by
cities, or even in far away rura
for a discussion of balneae versus thermac), And
pier
ace i10
BATHING IN THE ROMAN WORLD
extremely convenient for bathers to che th (unless it was
se there were so many to choose from, as Aristides
a). Like a convenient corer grocery
ned to be in a city, there was a bath
nearby, although some might have preferred to walk farther to
patronize their favorite establishments, Furthermore, even though
baths mainly operated for profit, entrance fees were so low that
even the poorest were not deterred; and there were always some
establishments subsidized by wealthy community leaders, such as
goverment and imperial officials secking popularity, that were free
of charge:
Th ved setting of the Roman city was essentially one in
which physical, social, and mental pleasures - the sensual aware-
ness that forms the very core of our existence - were sought after,
med, savored, and shared, Although conservative writers and
philosophers, such as Seneea (who lived during the first century
C.E.), disapproved of the soft and sensuous world of baths and the
growing taste for luxury in all aspects of life, most Romans appre:
ciated the privileges of their material culture; and the dream world
created by public baths was pri ng these enjoyments and
entitlements, In the sumptuous setting of the imperial thermae, even
the poorest could share the Empire's wealth and, perhaps, ideology.
Baths gave the Romans the world they wanted, a woeld in which it
vexing be
comments about his Smyrr
store, wherever one happ:
civ
ry ar
3
BATHING RITUALS AND ACTIVITIES
TIME OF BATHING
hat were the pleasurable activities that constituted a distine-
tive culture of bathing for the Romans? And what was the
orderly bathing ritual that occupied such a significant part of the
afternoon? To answer these questions, we should consider bathing
in the larger context of the Reman day. The Roman workday
started early and was confined mainly to the morning hours. By
noon, or soon after, the business of the day was finished. After a
Tight lunch, and pethaps a short siesta, men went to the baths and
stayed there for several hours (mixed bathing is discussed in Chap-
ter 4). Martial recommended the “cighth hour” as the best time to
bathe, as “This hour tempers the warm by " (Martial,
Because the Roman day was divided
to sunset, the length of an hour varied from season to season, Still,
the eighth hour corresponds roughly to tw or three o'clock in the
afternoon, A very busy person might be forced to pe ne his bath
till a very late hour, Ina letter to Tiberius, Augustus invoked his
friend's sympathy for having to sacrifice his meal and delay his bath
until the first hour of the night (¢, 6 P.M.) because of his pressing
duties.
"1BATHING IN THE ROMAN WORLD
nces to artificial lighting of baths,
many bath excavations, Night
ially in public establishments,
There are occasional refere
ve been found
+ espe
athing under copious daylight, and well
and oil lamps b
bathing was rare, howeve
atrons liked to enjoy
lighted baths with large windows were especially admire
ie establish,
|. Even
he ritual in sor
1c been part o
sunbathing appears to bi
ments, Norr
pal) order bets
| (or munici-
ly, public baths were closed by imperi
daylight faded, Exceptions seem to reinforce th
“donated oil for
rule, Emperor Alexander Se
us (ana=s5 C
the lighting of the baths, which had been previously closed before
ors (SHA,
sunset,” according toa late Roman history of the empe
ated by the
he
Alex. Sev. 24.6). This early closing hour was reit
emperor Tacitus (late third century c.t.) t0 avoid possible n
time disturbances (SHA, Tacitus,
ROUTINE OF BATHING
tials of the bathing routine as stated by Pliny the
m oiled, | take my exercise, I
were simple: “T
have my bath” (Pliny, Letters, 9.46). In the previously ment
schoolbooks, the bathing sequence is given with equal simplicity:
erably with a se
the schoolbey
slave carrying his bathing gear and garments; he py
stores his clothes, has his body oiled and
ves at the baths, pre nt OF
8 the bath fee,
d, and
then
undresses
takes a sweat bath followed by full immersion in the hot tub
he goes (outside?) to the cold pool and swims in it, has his body
, dress,
dried the hly with a towel by an attendant, dresses
yourself elegantly and well!) and concludes his bath by wish
ing, well to others and thanking, the bath master for a good bath
Bathe well and may it all gs
h master;
» well with yout I give thanks to the
he washes warmly, farewell master!
A well-to-do Roman was ac
ypanicd to the barhs by his slaves
y
his bathing paraphernalia: exercise and bathing garments,
vilet kit = the last was a metal
wed oils and perfumes in flasks,
several strigils (curved metal blades like spy
ndals, towels, and his eista or
box, cylindrical, th
mis to scrape the excess
cd_a sponge (t
gure 2). A poor person carried
his own bundle; it was a declaration of ostentatious wealth and
nded by an ar
well-groomed slaves, carried on a sedan chair, Upon arrivin
status to go to and return from the baths ate
ny af
BATHING RITUALS AND ACTIVITIES
+
——
se, one undressed,
These
rooms must have contained wooden cabinets, chests, and benches
the baths and before taking some farm af exere
ial room for this purpose
usually in the apodyterium, a spe
for storing personal effects and clothes. Some baths, such as the
Stabian Baths in Pompeii, had niches, shelves, cubbyholes, and
incl ler
nce well preserved; in the sn
benches all in masoney,
and poorer establishments, wooden pegs on the wall might have
sufficed (Figures 5 and 4).
a. A strigil, lef oi
ial porate flasks
used in baths, night
ples Archaeological4
BATHING IN THE ROMAN WORLD
A perennial problem in public baths was the stealing of bathers’
clothes. Many inscriptions allude to this much-despised nuisance
and ways to prevent it. Most interesting are the curse tablets thar
place all manners of maledictions on thieves and call for super-
natural assistance, Some were even willing co donate the stolen
irems to a deity in return for divine retribution, One tablet from
the thermal baths at Aquac Sulis (Bath, England) is typical: “Soli-
nus to the goddess Minerva: | give your divinity my bathing tunic
and cloak, Do not allow sleep of health to him who has done me
wrong, whether man or woman, whether slave or free, unless he
reveals himself and returns those goods to your remple” (Fagan
1999, 375 Tab, Sults, ¢2). Sometimes these injunctions might have
helped, but to have one’s servant guard aver one’s belongings was
far more effective and quite common, In the small, luxurious baths
described by Lucian (second century C.t.), there was even a special
room in which the slaves could wait while the master bathed,
BATHING, EXERCISE, AND GAMES
beet. some form of athletic activity prior to bathing was
considered a healthy th modest amount of exercise
and games, perhaps just enough to raise a sweat, was the proper
preamble to bathing, Ordinarily, public baths had indoor and out-
door amenities for exercise, Inspired by the Greck gymnasium,
most of these spaces were designed as outdoor courtyards, often
pnnaded, usually called palaestrae. The visitor, entering a bath
plex, first changed his or her street clothes for some form of
light exercise
Unlike the Greeks in their gymnasia, the Romans did not think
it proper to exercise in the nude, nor did they e
enter the palacstrac or hot rooms of their favorite bathing establish:
ments in street clothes or shoes, In tion on the kind of tunics
se is scanty. These probably varied a
fo season, climate, and regional customs. Trilmalchio (the ©
hero in Petronius’ Satyricon) wore a light dress while playing ball,
Martial mentions one Phialenis who took her exercises in a sl
garment like a bikini, The Iso the endromts, a weap of
rexture worn over lighter clothing, probably ro protect the sweaty
body from cold after exercise (Martial, 7.67 and 4.19); this might
popular in colder northern European provinces, Martial
nsider it correct to
they wore for exe
ponding.
mical
w
BATHING RITUALS AND ACTIVITH
also mentions a small, tight-fitting cap called the galericilum worn
by fashionable youth in the palaestra to protect their hair from oil
(Martial, 14.50).
Inthe Stra, engaging in some form of athletic activity prior
to hot bathing was considered the healthy thing to do. It would be
a mistake, however, to imagine thar the average Roman engaged
in strenuous exercises, like the young athletes of the Greek gymna-
sium. Roman gymnastics in this context was merely a prelude to
bathing, a form of recreation, not serious training for comperition,
Galen, a famed physician practicing in Rome in the mid-secand
century, who recommended milder forms of exercise
tion to bathing, is typical of current medical opinion. In his essay
on “Exercise with a Small Ball” (De parvae pilae exercitu), he
prefers light ball games to other, more strenuous sports in the
palacstra. Ball games developed all parts of the body in a bal-
anced way and appealed to all age groups. Martial mentions five
kins of ball games played in the baths: handball (pilae), feather-
ball (pila pagarica), bladder-ball (follies), seutfle-ball (harpastum),
and triple-ball (pita trigowalis). The last mentioned, as the name
n con
4. Cartoon view
of
from
pet. Courtesy of
A. Fremona,BATHING IN THE ROMAN WORLD
implies, was a game for three: the opponents stoad roughly at the
three points of a triangle and tried to mislead and confuse each
other as they passed several balls back and forth, Unlike solo exer-
cises, ball games had the advantage of being good spectator sports
(Figure 5).
rong other palaestral sports, running, boxing, wrestling, and
fencing are mentioned, although their practice was not limited to
the palaestra; many of the larger baths had special halls that could
be used for indoor athletics, Women did participate in these sports
and games, though they probably preferred (or it was expected
of them to prefer) the lighter variety. Juvenal, writing in the mid=
second century ¢.t., mocked society women who worked out with
weights and dumbbells for infringing upon a heavier branch of
sports that was obviously considered more appropriate for men.
Swimming or rolling a metal hoop with a hooked stick (trochus)
might have been thought more suitable. Swimming was a popu:
lar sport wz the Romans, but it is unlikely thar any serious
swimming was done at the baths (although the “schoolboy”
lists swimming among his bath activities in Hermenewmata Ps
Dositheana, see Chapter 1), Baths often had pools large enough
to swim in, but even the largest of these, the natatio of imperial
thermae, barely reached a depth of 1-1.2m, Few are known to
have inchided a deep end for diving, Although one could swim (or
float) in amazingly shallow warers, swimming in these pools must
have been limited to a few easy strokes, with most of the bathers
pmpetition swimming
mnasia serving exelu-
rly imperial palaestra or gymna-
sium at Hercula boasts a well-preserved, simple, serious lap
pool deep enough for diving,
Following the Greck athletic procedure, bathers ordinarily cov-
ered their bodies with oils and dusted with cosmetic powders dur>
ing exercise or sunbathing. The sweaty mixture of oil and dust (and
plain muck, given that the exercise ground was unpaved) had to be
washed off and scraped off with the strigil, also like Greek arhletes,
ovided special rooms for massage with warm oil,
led aleipterion, destrictornemt, of wnetortum, It
way also customary to terminate hot bathing by anointing the body
with specially prepared, and often expensive, cosmetics, oils, and
perfumed unguents,
BATHING RITUALS AND ACTIVITIES
Time spent in the palaestra with its games was pleasant, bur the
delights waiting inside the baths were pleasanter still, Few were
so engrossed in their exercise as not to drop everything and hurry
inside with the first sounding of the sinténeatweleet, the bell that
announced the opening of the hor baths,
BATHING ORDER
nside the baths, the order of bathing required a movement from
warm fo hot through a number of intercommunicating rooms
at Varying, temperature; the primary stations in the sequence can
be identified as the tepidarium (medium heat room) and ealdariam
(hor room). Bathing terminated with a cold plunge in one of the very
large unheated pools of the frigidarium (cold room). The last nwo,
caldarium and frigidarium, were usually the most architecturally
imposing and luxurious spaces in Roman baths, Most bathers
perceived benefits fram spending some time in one of the special
sweating rooms, called the laconicum, for dry heat, or sudatorium,
for steamy, wet heat.
6. Cartoon view af
ipimnes and spor
Apalyestea (shown8
BATHING IN THE ROMAN WORLD
veami-
Some of the hs boasted special sunrooms (h
res and benefits of sunbathing, In two
n’s Villa in Tivoli ~ the Large Baths
and the Baths-with-Helioca is ~ there are large, round rooms:
with immense, unglazed windows oriented to the west and south.
The floors of these spes ed, furnished with
sand like the beach. The public by and large enjoyed the copious
illumination of the newer, imperial-era baths made possible by con
J large, arched windows filling up
curving vault. There are even ref-
aus) tor the sensi
of the establishments in Hadi
jal sunrooms were unp.
J and sea while sunbathing or immersed in a pool = reminding
of the so-called “infinity pools” of fancy modern estates,
The order of bathing and body care outlined above was not
al framework that received its
a fixed routine, but only a g
inspiration from the medical traditions of antiquity and
The size, layout, and luxury of a bath - that is, its architecture -
must have also affected the preferred order or routine of bathing.
Anywhere along the recommended course, deviations, «
petitions were possible, One bathe
habit
nissions,
ENTERTAINMENT IN BATHS
in the calda
and cold bathing, to wash, to
or even depilation,
st of their tim ium and the frigi-
in halls for he
leisurely soak in larg
and to converse
pools, to
i gossip with fellow bathers all along. But these
ry of social
well-lighted, spacious halls were also used for a w
and recreational ud eve
vities a
Lanices
Poetry reading,
icited amateur
is the wns
music, and singing — profes
kind = were e
A mosaic panel at the entrance of a bath in
¢ jugglers and, perched on the left arm of one, a
encumbered large spaces,
enthusiastic auchence = seem to
stages for traveling shows, performers, gym:
palac
have served
masts, eo)
be
reign (a4
J musi
< Jesters, m1
s,
i ns, An inscription may
artist named Ursus, who lived during Hadrian's
a8 Cob), fan ing a game with glass balls
crowds in four great thermae of Rome (CIL, 6,1
hour a pom
us for pertor
797)
ved his own epitaph and hoped to. preserve the
BATHING RITUALS AND ACTIVITIES
memory of his unusual skill for poste
been granted in
really reterred toa
his wish seems to have
odest and (because wh SCrypeion,
Ursus is debated among scholars} peculiar
her this
EATING AND DRINKING IN BATHS
E iting and drinking would |
group and augmented the enjoyment of any recreational activ
and the visitors of public baths wer
drink were available in establishments just ourside the baths or acru-
ally from vendors inside, A price list scribbled on the wall from a
vin the Suburban Hachs in Herculaneum includes “nuts, ci
at, and sausage,
10674). An inscription of Hadri
the-Meander, in Asia Minar, mentions a rest
ly annexed to the barhs selling cheese, ba
ves, Wine, fish, and vegetables. Of particular interest was a
haped” pretzel, probably quite similar to the ring-shaped,
crusted bagel (sfmrit} very popular in Turkey today, Some
bath excavations yielded cups, plates, and jugs, as well as be
of animals, such as pigs, sheep, and chickens. For most patrons,
eating at the haths meant light refreshment or a snack as a prelude
toa proper dinner; others, h al of it. As Martial
humorously informs us, Aemilius ate lettuce, eggs, and ecls and
tried to excuse his appetite by saying thar he did not take dinner at
me ~ hardly to be believed. And one Philoseratus, drunk on wine,
fell down a long flight of steps to his death on his way from a party
at the thermal baths in Sinuessa, famed for its curative waters: “He
would not have incurred such great danger, ye Nymphs, if he had
drunk your waters instead,” Martial sagely comments (Martial,
12.19, 11.82),
A good bath called for a good dinner, “It is little consolation tw
bathe in luxury and perish in ion,” observed Martial with
satirical exaggeration and proceeded to sharpen his lively wit on
the subject of dinner, the cena, as the culmination of the bath and
the Roman day, in no less than cight short poems or epig
his preferred method of social « ntary, Martial himself was a
cordial host who strave to arrange a perfect time for his friends:
“You will dine nicely, Julius Cerialius, at my house, You will be
infused merriment into a
Food and
no except
“
wever, made am
19BATHING IN THE ROMAN WORLD:
bserve the eighth hour; we will barhe together: you know
hanus’ baths are to me. First ehere will be... lettuce
useful for relaxing the bowels, and shoots from tender leeks...”
owed with a long list of delectables his friend could enjoy in
r-bath dinner (Martial, 11.52). It seems that in Roman cul
ture, to dine alone was something of a social failure for some,
and an outright disaster for spony who hoped to feast sump-
tuously at the expense of a rich acquaintance, Sometimes it was
very hard to free oneself from the es of an obsequious far
terer such as Menogenes, who would not leave until he obtained a
reluctant inv ‘a escape Menogenes at the warm baths is
not possible no matter how hard you try, He will grab the warm.
hand-ball with right and left so that he can score a point for you,
He will pick up the flacci¢l bladder-ball fram the dust for you even
if he has already bathed. He'll say your towels are whiter than
snow although they may be dirtier than a baby's bib. As you comb
your thinning hair he'll say that you have arranged your locks like
Achilles... He'll praise everything, he'll adn hing, uncil
torally exasperated, you will succumb: Come to din * (Martial,
12.82}, On the other hand, there was Dento, who had found a
wealthier dinner patron and started to spurn the poet's invitations
(s.44.1) and Cotta required such serious courting that even Mar:
tial (who obviously liked this Cotta!) had drawn a blank on him:
“If you wish to feast ar Cocta’s table, the baths offer the best
to ge witation, Enever yer dined with him though; my naked
charms, | imagine, do not excite his
free translati
his a
re ever
nee
niration™ (Martial, 1.23,
1).
SENECA'S DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC BATHS
Bae: best description of the crowsdled, noisy, vibrant world
of the public bath, a world thatis both delighttul sand distaste-
ful = at any ever niely in
hedonist alike =is Seneca’s cha
nis activities andl noises
sistible to both the stoic and the
ily satiric
account of the var-
1, wrtvan bath:
my from as
Thave loclgings right «
the aysort
ry powers
is exercising himself hi
bathing establishn
Is, which a
at, So, picture yourself
enough tot
us gentle
aden weights; when he is working
hard, or else pretends to be working hard, | can hear him grunts
BATHING RITUALS AND ACTIVITIES
whenever he releases his imprisoned breath, |
wheezy and high-pitched tones, Or, perhaps, Inon
conrent with a cheap rubslown, and hear the ‘of the pumunelin
hand on his shoulder, varying in sou nel bs laid 0
flat or hollow. Then perhaps, a professional conte: shouting o
the score [of a ball game]; that is the finishing touch. Add to this the
arresting of an occasional rhief or pickpocke ket of the man
the enthusiast
who phinges into the swimming pool with unconscionable noise an
splashing. Besides all those voices, if nothing ele are good, imagi
the hairplucker with his penetrating, sh ¢ purposes of
advertisement lly giving vene and
except when he is plucking the armpits and making his
instead. Then the cake-seller, with his varied cries, the sausagem
the candy-seller, and the vendors of food hawking their goods, each
distinctive intonation, (Letters, 6, traits, R. M. Gunnmere)
hear him panting
some lazy fellow,22
4
CRITICS OF ROMAN BATHING:
ETHICAL AND MORAL CONCERNS
ike all complex, multidimensional, and reasonably free
societies, the Romans, through the weitings of their his-
torians, poets, essayists, and satirists, could be critical af
themselves and their cultural institutions. Although an
intangible, nationalistic sense of identity and pride as “Romans” -
distinctly different from and superior to foreigners (whom they
often called *barbari and even the normally and grudgingly
admired Greeks = was valued and cherished, the Roman educated
wer idle in questioning those received values and pros
viding opposition at both popular and intellectual levels, For a soci-
ety that was primarily conservative, moralizing, anid obsessed with
traditions handed down from their ancestors, skepticism against
novelty and change is to be expect It is also to be expected that
bathing, as.4. social institution that occupied such a paramount
in Roman lite, should receive its share of valuation and
riticism. It is this critical assessment of the bathing culture by the
Romans that makes the subject, across three continents and over
centuries, vibrant and relevant to our interests. However, there iy
a downside to such repetitive assessments and reassessments over
cof time and pla rying, contrasting, and often
he subject of baths and
bathing in the contest of other issues and arguments, tend to blur
classes wer
CRITICS OF ROMAN BATHING
the truth about the real nature and intent of baths and bathers,
‘Often baths are merely used as a metaphor for other concerns,
Therefore, we need to understand the lange literature on Roman
baths and bathing, its lavish praises as well as its strong eritigism,
against such s cultural backdrop; we need to develop our own
analytical and screening processes,
YEARNING FOR REPUBLICAN SIMPLICITY AND
CRITICISM OF LUXURY
hile resting in the country house that once belonged ta 5
pio Africanus (c. 200 8.c.0.), the hero of the Second Punic
ar, Seneca, the conservative writer and philosopher, who lived in
the first half of the first century ¢.e,, saw the small, dark baths the
famous general had used. Drawing a contrast herween the venera-
ble old and the suspect mew, he deplored the accustomed luxuries
of baths of his own day: “[Today] we think ourselves poor and
mean if our walls are not resplendent with large and costly mirrors;
if our marbles [decorating our barhs] from faraway Alexandri:
not set off by mosaics of rich, yellow stone from Numi
Antico, a handsome and expensive marble} .
ings are not buried in glass [mosaics |; if our swimming pools are nor
lined with marble from Thasos, once a rare and wonderful sight
in any temple...and finally, if water is noe poured from silver
faucets,,..Whata number of statues, of colurms thar support
nothing but are built for mere decoration, merely in order to spend
more money! And what masses of water fall crashing from level
to level! We have become so luxurious that we have nothing but
precious stones to walk upon” (Letlers, 86), It is interesting that
there is only faint exaggeration in Sencea's polemical outburst
Archaeological evidence from Italy and all the provinces bears
out that many baths of the imperial period were indeed lavishly
decorated,
Seneca proceeded with his lesson in morality and modesty by
contrasting the overly lighted contemporary baths with the austere
darkness of the old ones, such as the Stabian Barhs or the Foru
Baths in Pompeii: *,.,for our ancestors did not think that o
could have a hot bath except in darkness. .. nowadays, however,
people regard baths as fit only for moths if they have not been
arranged so that they receive the sun all day long through the
[giallo
if our vaulted ceil:
23BATHING IN THE ROMAN WORLD
largest of windows, if men can not bathe and get a coat of tan at
the same time, and if they can not look out from their bath-rubs
over stretches of land and sea,” Regretting even the popular habit of
bathing every day, instead of once a week as the old Romans, such
as Scipio, used to do, he concluded, “Now thar spick-and-span
bathing establishments have been devised, men are really fouler
than of yore” (Letters, 86, trans, R. M. Gummere),
Taken at its face value, Seneca’s criticism is unjust; light in archi-
tecture is to he praised; well-lighted interiors are admirable, and
so is the habit of daily bathing. Bur Seneca was giving voice to
a well-known moralizing attitude that disapproved of the increas-
ing luxuries of the Empire compared with the frugal manners and
military virtues of the past. He was not alone: disapproval of exces-
sive material luxury represented by public baths, objection to the
worldly and wasteful lifestyle they encouraged, and condemnation
of the sexual licentiousness and moral delinquency associated with
them were among the issues raised widely by conservative crit-
ies, and in time constituted the basis of Christian opposition to
bathing.
A contemporary of Seneca, the populist philosopher Demetrius
the Cynic, reportedly entered the Thermac of Nero in Rome during,
its dedication and opening ceremonics and delivered to the aristoc-
racy gathered there a speech “against people who bathed, declar-
ing that bathing enfcebled and polluted onc; and declared thar such
institutions were a useless expense” (Philostratus, The Life of Apol-
fonins, 4.92). It was the wrong place and the wrong time for outspo-
kenness; he narrowly escaped with his life, The elder Pliny, another
contemporary, commented on excessive anointing and bathing as
grim indicators of a spreading social disease. He criticized in a satir-
ical manner the “broiling baths by which they have persuaded us
that food is cooked in our bodies so that everybody leaves them
weaker for treatment and the most submi are carried out to
be buried...” (Pliny, Nu, 24.26). Pliny’s loopy humor is echoed
ina passage in his famous Exgbry-sinth Letter, where the moralist
speaks about the “fashionable heat™ of the baths im his day as a
proper conflagration and quips “that a slave condemned for some
criminal offense now ought to be bathed alive” (Letters, 86.10). A
century Later, the Roman historian Tacitus characterized this way
cof life, “the lounge, the banquet, the bath,” as “a form of vice
CRITICS OF ROMAN BATHING
brought by the conquering Romans to Britain, which seduced the
hardy native inhabitants of the island” (Tacitus, Agricola, 21).
These refinements of Romanization affected every class and soci-
ety in Rome and abroad. Some of the emperors reportedly lived
amid baths and banquets in their imperial residences. According to
a late source called Scriptora Historiae Augustae, or The Lives of
the Emperors (and not always reliable}, Commodus, a late second
century emperor, bathed seven or eight times a day (SHA, Com-
modus, 1.9).
DID ROMAN BATHS ENCOURAGE
UNCOUTH BEHAVIOR?
ioe the public baths, along with the popular
pleasures. it offered, engendered coarse, irritating, and even
violent behavior. The tramp, the vagabond, and the ordinary lout
found excellent opportunities for their uncouth and boorish ways.
The newly nich showed off their wealth and petty affectations;
young Algernon displayed six rings on his fingers and young Maro
displayed his nude physique and gathered applause, There were
those who treated the crowds to unsolicited concerts or vulgar
recitals of amateur poetry - as well illustrated in Seneca’s previously
quoted s6th Letter on “bath noises” (discussed in Chapter 5). A
generation or so earlier, Horace, a poet and satirist of the late
Republic, made similar humorous observations about the irritating
aural backdrop and unwanted display of erudition in public baths:
“Many there are who recite their writings in the middle of the
Forum, or in the baths. How pleasantly the vaulted space echoes
the voice! That delights the fools who never ask themselves whether
whar they do is in bad taste or out of season™ (Horace, Satires,
1.4.76-80). Martial’s suffering from the bad poetry of aspiring
poets, such as Ligurinus, is too good to omit: “You read to me as
I stand, you read to me as | sit. You read to me as | man, you read
to me as I shit. | escape to the baths: you buzz my ear. I head for
the pool: I am not allowed to swim. I haste for dinner, you stop me
as I go. I reach for the table, you drive me away as I cat” (Martial,
3-44).
The younger Pliny’s account of the lamentable story of Larcius
Macedo, a practorian of slave ancestry, suggests that baths were
a5