IJRECE VOL.
7 ISSUE 1 (JANUARY- MARCH 2019) ISSN: 2393-9028 (PRINT) | ISSN: 2348-2281 (ONLINE)
Analysis the Performance of MANET Under Nodes
Breakdown
Rajwinder Kaur ([Link] CSE)1, Dr. Raman Chadha2
1
Research Scholar, 2Professor, HOD,CSE,
12
CGC Technical Campus, Jhanjeri, Mohali Punjab
Abstract- In MANET nodes perform actions on battery. So by
the use of battery it is possible that the battery gone dead. Due
to this node off the working. So In this paper this effect of
node failure is analysed on the performance of AODV,
OLSR,GRP and mix. To analyse this performance further the
nodes are passed at different speed in same scenario. To
analyse this effect Opnet Modeller 14.5 is used, the
performance is taken in terms of nodes.
Keyword- Manet, Protocol, mobility, varying nodes, node
failure
I. INTRODUCTION
MANET is a temporary wireless network which does formed
without the use of any existing network infrastructure and MANET routing protocols related with the concerns like
without any centralized administration. Nodes are mobile in appeared and disappeared of nodes in different locations [3].
nature in MANET, hence the topology and structure of the These routing protocols need to have smaller routing tables in
network changes frequently. In MANET nodes also act as a order to reduce routing link overheads.
router and play role in routing. If the nodes are mobile,
routing become the most important and challenging task in III. RESULT
MANET. In this paper the result is taken in terms of Delay, wireless
In this paper to analyse the effect of node failure different LAN traffic send and Traffic received.
scenarios are made. Firstly 87 nodes are taken by using
protocol AODV. In this scenario some Nodes are moving with
speed fixed speed of 0.6m/s and some nodes are moving at
varying speed of 0-10m/s. To analyse the effect of node failure
some nodes are failed between 20 sec and recovered at 30 sec.
then this scenario is repeated by increasing the no. of nodes to
105. Then these scenarios are repeated by using protocol
OLSR, GRP. Further it is possible that different protocol come
in same scenario. So to analyse this effect these scenarios are
repeated in which some nodes have AODV some have OLSR
and some have GRP.
II. MANET ROUTING PROTOCOLS MANET
Routing protocol is a resolution that controls how nodes
decide the ways of routing packets between the source and a
destination. In mobile ad hoc networks, nodes have to
determine their network topology. A new node announces its
presence and it listens to the announcements broadcast by its
neighbours. MANET routing protocols are three types namely,
reactive protocol (on demand), proactive protocol (table
driven) and hybrid protocol. Fig.2 represents some types of
MANET routing protocols [2]:
Fig.1: delay(sec)
Form fig1 it is clear that when AODV is used then the
response time is 3 second. When OLSR is used then the
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING
A UNIT OF I2OR 2417 | P a g e
IJRECE VOL. 7 ISSUE 1 (JANUARY- MARCH 2019) ISSN: 2393-9028 (PRINT) | ISSN: 2348-2281 (ONLINE)
response time is 1 second .when GRP is used then the response time is also 1.4 second. fig 3 also shows that during
response time is 0.2 second . Whenmixed is used then the node failure time decrease because data sending to node is lost
response time is also 0.2 second. fig1 also shows that during and new path is build.
node failure response time decrease because data sending to
node is lost and new path is build.
Fig.2: throughput for 87 nodes
Fig.4: throughput for 105 nodes
Form fig2 it is clear that when AODV is used then
throughput(processed data)is 14,000,000bits/sec . when OLSR Form fig4 it is clear that when AODV is used then Traffic sent
is used then throughput is 8,000,000 bits/sec .when GRP is is 16,000,000bits/sec . When OLSR is used then Traffic sent
used then throughput is 13,000,000 bits/sec . when mixed is is 8,000,000bits/sec .When GRP is used then Traffic sent is
used then throughput is 13,000,000 bits/sec. fig2 also shows 28,000,000 bits/sec . When mixed is used then Traffic sent is
that during node failure throughput decrease because data 28,000,000 bits/sec. fig 4 also shows that during node failure
sending to node is lost and new path is build. load decrease because data sending to node is lost and new
path is build.
IV. CONCLUSION
In this paper node failure effect is analysed on
AODV,OLSR,GRP and combined protocol. To analyse this
effect further nodes are moved at different speeds in same
scenarios. Further to enhance the work no. node are vary from
87 to 105. The result is taken in terms of delay and throughput
Data processed and wireless response time. Form the result it
is clear that performance of DSR and Mix protocol is better
for 87 nodes and for 105 nodes OLSR is better. When mix
protocol is used then with increase in no. of nodes the
performance decreases.
V. REFERENCES
[1]. Teressa Longjam and Neha Bagoria, February 2013.
Fig.3: delay 105 “Comparative Study of Destination Sequenced Distance Vector
and Ad-hoc on-demand Distance Vector Routing Protocol of
Mobile Ad-hoc Network”.
Form fig3 it is clear that when AODV is used for 105 nodes
[2]. C. E. Perkins, E. M. Belding-Royer and S. R. Das, 25-26
then the response time is 3.3 second . when OLSR is used February 1999. “Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV)
then the response time is 2 second .when GRP is used then the Routing,” pp. 90-100. 2nd IEEE Workshop on Workshop
response time is 1.4 second . when mixed is used then the Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, New Orleans.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING
A UNIT OF I2OR 2418 | P a g e
IJRECE VOL. 7 ISSUE 1 (JANUARY- MARCH 2019) ISSN: 2393-9028 (PRINT) | ISSN: 2348-2281 (ONLINE)
[3]. Rakesh Kumar Jha, Pooja Kharga, March 2015. “A Comparative
Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols in MANET using
NS3 Simulator”.
[4]. [Link], RFC3561, July 2003. “Ad hoc on demand Distance
Vector (AODV) routing”.
[5]. Sreekanth Vakati, [Link], July 2013. “Performance
Analysis of Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks”.
[6]. Dilpreet Kaur, Naresh Kumar, 2013. “Comparative Analysis of
AODV, OLSR, TORA, DSR and DSDV Routing protocols in
Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks,” in IJCNIS journal, vol.5, no.3,
pp.39.
[7]. T. Clausen and P. Jaqcquet, RFC 3626, October 2003.
“Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) Protocol”, IETF
Networking Group.
[8]. I.W.H. Ho, K.K. Leung, J.W. Polak, and R. Mangharam,
Oct.2007. “Node connectivity in vehicular ad hoc networks with
structured mobility,” pp. 635-642, in Proc. 32nd IEEE
Conference on Local Computer Networks, Clontarf Castle,
Dublin, Ireland.
[9]. Johnson,D.B.;Maltz, D.A. (1996). “Dynamic Source Routing in
Ad Hoc Wireless Networks”.
[10]. Broch,J.; Maltz,D.A.;Johnson, D. B.; Hu,Y. C.; Jetcheva, J.
(1998). "A performance comparison of multi-hop wire -less ad
hoc network routing protocols". Proceedings of the 4th annual
ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and
networking
[11]. Philipp Sommer, 2007. “Design and Analysis of Realistic
Mobility Models for Wireless Mesh Networks”, M. Eng. Thesis,
Department of Information Technology and Electrical
Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland.
[12]. NS-3 tutorial. [Online]. Available:
[Link]
ml/[Link].
[13]. Mohanapriya Marimuthu and Ilango Krishnamurthi, , Feb.2013.
“Enhanced OLSR for Defense against DOS Attack in Ad-Hoc
Networks”, Journal of communications.
[14]. Qutaiba Razouqi, Ahmed Boushehri, Mohamed Gaballah, Lina
Alsaleh, 2013. “Extensive Simulation Performance Analysis for
DSDV, DSR, and AODV MANET Routing Protocols. IEEE.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING
A UNIT OF I2OR 2419 | P a g e
