Palm Fiber Composite with Al2O3 Study
Palm Fiber Composite with Al2O3 Study
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: In the present work, a palm fiber was reinforced with epoxy resin and developed a Palm Fiber Composite
Received 20 May 2019 (PFC) by hand lay method. And then, 0.3 wt% of Al2O3 ceramic particles was included in the PFC and
Received in revised form 5 December 2019 developed the Ceramic Palm Fiber Composite (CPFC). The mechanical tests such as hardness, tensile,
Accepted 7 December 2019
impact and flexural were conducted to evaluate the mechanical properties. Tribological tests also con-
Available online xxxx
ducted to evaluate the friction and wear loss of PFC and CPFC. The mechanical and wear tests reveals that
CPFC exhibits the better performance than PFC.
Keywords:
Ó 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Palm fiber
Aluminum oxide
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Confer-
COF ence on Materials Engineering and Characterization 2019.
Wear
Hardness
1. Introduction Moreover, many attempts have taken for inclusion of ceramic par-
ticles in the composites [3,4,12,13].
The composite is the material which is composed of two or The above mentioned research works were useful to identify
more dissimilar material on a macro scale to form a new material the research gap. Although many attempts have taken for develop-
with a property that is entirely different from the individual con- ing natural fiber ceramic composites, there is a scarcity for palm
stituents. The cost of natural fiber composite is low and light in fiber composite with ceramic particles. Moreover, very few works
weight but strength wise lower than the synthetic fiber [1]. There have published on tribological behavior of natural composites
are many natural fibers banana, coconut, sisal, palm sheath etc are [14]. Therefore, in the present study, the mechanical and tribolog-
used for natural fiber composites [2–5]. ical properties of Palm fiber composite with Al2O3 particles were
The banana and sisal fibers were successfully used to fabricate evaluated.
the natural hybrid composites. The mechanical properties of
hybrid composite can be improved by maintaining equal percent-
age of fibers [6,7]. In engineering applications, single material will
2. Materials
not be suitable to meet a particular design requirement. For exam-
ple, aerospace application needs the materials that should have
2.1. Palm fiber
lightweight, high strength and stiffness, good abrasive, impact
and corrosion resistance [8–10].
Fiber is extracted by a process known as decortications, where
Due to increasing environmental concerns, the interest to use
leaves are crushed and beaten by a rotating wheel set with blunt
renewable resources is growing continuously, especially in the
knives. Dry palm fibers are machine combed and sorted into vari-
automotive industry. A quick development in research and
ous grades. Then, the Palm fiber is dried and brushed to remove the
advancements in the field of natural fiber composites could be seen
moisture content and improver the fiber quality. Photographic
in the most recent years. Characteristic fiber-fortified structure
view of Palm tree and Palm fibre is presented in Fig. 1.
squeezed composites have been utilized for inside boards [11].
Many research works have been done on the palm strengthened
epoxy composites. It has been seen that no epoxy pitch in the fiber
lumen found in the cracked palm epoxy. Also, there is less bonding
⇑ Corresponding author. between palm and epoxy which gives feeble attachment properties
E-mail address: [email protected] (P. Murali). in the composite. Hence, an attempt has done to add ceramic par-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.044
2214-7853/Ó 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Materials Engineering and Characterization 2019.
Please cite this article as: A. Devaraju and P. Murali, Experimental investigation of mechanical and tribological properties of palm fiber composite with
Al2O3 ceramic particles, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.044
2 A. Devaraju, P. Murali / Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
Fig. 1. Photographic view of (a) Palm tree and (b) Palm fibre.
ticle with the palm fiber. The properties of palm fiber in the Table 1 3.3. Preparation of palm fibre composite (PFC)
[5].
Palm fibre is produced from plants. They were in irregular shape
and size. It has brought them to the required size of
2.2. Epoxy resin and aluminium oxide particles
20 20 3 cm. Even then, they were not flat; its surface had some
crusts and troughs. To make it flat, it was placed in the mold and
An epoxy resin is defined as a molecule with more than one
compressed in composite plate (Stainless Steel). Initially, Fibers
epoxy group, which can be hardened into a usable plastic. The
are orchestrated in an arbitrarily arranged way and apply the mix-
epoxy group, which is also called the glycidyl group, has through
ture of epoxyresin (Ly556) and hardener (hy991). Then a mixture
its characteristic appearance given the name to epoxy. Al2O3 cera-
of 100 ml resin, 10 ml hardener. The plates were curing for 48 h.
mic particles with higher surface area (85 m2/g) have been synthe-
And, the required size of PFC was removed from the large compos-
sized by precipitation method.
ite plate.
3. Experimental procedure
Please cite this article as: A. Devaraju and P. Murali, Experimental investigation of mechanical and tribological properties of palm fiber composite with
Al2O3 ceramic particles, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.044
A. Devaraju, P. Murali / Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx 3
3.4. Preparation of Ceramic particles included palm fibre composite 4.2. Tensile test
(CPFC)
Tension test is made by holding the test specimen between
Palm Fibres are arranged in a randomly oriented manner and cross-heads. By adjusting the lower and upper cross heads the
apply the mixture of epoxy and hardener. Then a mixture of specimen can be held tightly for the test. The 100KN universal test-
100 ml resin, 10 ml hardener and 0.3% of Ceramic-Particles ing machine was used for the test. The result has been presented in
(Al2O3). The plate was curing for 48 h and removes the required Fig. 7. The tensile strength of CPFC was 92 MPa which is 15% higher
size of CPFC plate from the fabricated large composite plate. The compared to PFC value of 80 MPa. Improvement of tensile strength
fabricated Ceramic Palm Fiber Composite (CPFC) is shown in Fig. 5. is due to increase in yield stress while adding Ceramic-Particles
(Al2O3).
4.1. Brinell hardness test The izod impact test was conducted to study the energy absorb-
ing capacity of the composite. The impact test results of palm fiber
In the brinell test, a hardened steel ball indenter is forced into reinforced composite Ceramic-Particles (Al2O3) shows 20%
the surface of the composite plate to be tested. The diameter of increased values (92–110 J) compared to the palm fiber composite
the hardened steel indenter is 10 mm. Standard load range as in Fig. 8. The adding of Ceramic-Particles (Al2O3) improves the
between 500 g and 2000 kg in 500 kg increments. During a test, toughness of the CPFC and it helps to achieve the improved impact
the load is maintained constant for 10–15 s. From the experimental strength when compared to PFC.
results Table 2 and Fig. 6, it is observed that hardeness value of
CPFC is slightly higher than the PFC. The addition of the Ceramic- 4.4. Flexural test
Particles (Al2O3) might be increased the strength of the CPFC which
consequently improves the hardness. Three point bending flexural tests according to ASTMD790 stan-
dard with the cross head speed of 2.0 mm/min were applied on
upper and lower surface of each six replicate specimens of
Ceramic-Particles (Al2O3) and PFC the failure was calculated when
bending of specimen reaches upto corresponding critical point.
Effect of loading on the flexural strength on the prepared compos-
ites is presented in Fig. 9. It shows the flexural strength PFC and
CPFC composites are 25 MPa and 47 MPa respectively. The addition
of Ceramic-Particles (Al2O3) increases the flexural strength
(47 MPa) of palm fibre composites. Ceramic-Particles (Al2O3) dras-
tically improve the elastic modulus of CPFC and also increase its
strength. This could be the reason for high flexural strength value
for CPFC when compared to PFC.
Please cite this article as: A. Devaraju and P. Murali, Experimental investigation of mechanical and tribological properties of palm fiber composite with
Al2O3 ceramic particles, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.044
4 A. Devaraju, P. Murali / Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
Table 2
Brinell hardness testing result.
S. Specimen Load applied (p) in Diameter of the indenter (D) in Diameter of the indenter (d) in Surface area Indention A = pD BHN = 2P
p
No kg mm mm (D D2 d) A
1 CPFC 2000 5 4.5 34.23 116.85
2 PFC 2000 5 4.4 37.30 107.24
50
40
30
20
10
0
PFC CPFC
100
90
Tensile strength (Mpa)
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
PFC CPFC
115
110
Impact energy (J)
105
100
95
90
85
80
PFC CPFC
Please cite this article as: A. Devaraju and P. Murali, Experimental investigation of mechanical and tribological properties of palm fiber composite with
Al2O3 ceramic particles, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.044
A. Devaraju, P. Murali / Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx 5
40
35
5. Conclusion
0.5 300
250
Wear rate (m3/Nm)
0.4
200
0.3
COF
150
0.2 CPFC CPFC
100
PFC PFC
0.1 50
0 0
2 4 6 2 4 6
Load (N) Load (N)
(a) (b)
Fig. 11. The coefficient of friction and wear loss of PFC disc vs. 316L Stainless Steel pin Pair and CPFC disc vs. 316L Stainless Steel pin Pair at the constant temperature of 25 °C,
sliding speed of 0.5 m/s, sliding distance of 500 m and three different normal loads.
Please cite this article as: A. Devaraju and P. Murali, Experimental investigation of mechanical and tribological properties of palm fiber composite with
Al2O3 ceramic particles, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.044
6 A. Devaraju, P. Murali / Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
Fig. 12. The Optical Microscope picture taken at the wear track generated on the (a) PFC disc and (b) CPFC disc.
CRediT authorship contribution statement [7] A. Krishnakumari, A. Devaraju, M. Saravanan, Evaluation of mechanical
properties of hybrid root fibre reinforced polymer composites, Mater. Today.
Proc. 5 (2018) 14560–14566.
A. Devaraju: Methodology, Investigation, Writing - original [8] Chin-san wu. Hsin-TZU liao. Jheng-Jiejhang (2016). palm fibre- reinforced
draft. P. Murali: Data curation, Conceptualization, Writing - review hybrid composites of poly (butylene succinate): characterization and
assessment of mechanical and thermal properties polym.Bull.0:3443-3462.
& editing. [9] R. Harikumar, A. Devaraju, Fabrication and experimental analysis of copper
wire embedded with GFRP composites, Mater. Today Proc. 5 (6) (2018) 14327–
References 14332.
[10] Gridhar J., Kishore and R.M.V.G.K. Rao, (2005) Moisture Absorption
[1] P. Parandaman, M. Jayaraman, Experimental investigation on the mechanical Characteristics of Natural fiber composites, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and
properties of jute/sisal/glass and jute/banana/glass hybrid composite Composites v5, 141 -150
materials, Eur. J. Appl. Sci. 7 (3) (2015) 138–144. [11] A. Devaraju, A critical review on different types of wear of materials, Int. J.
[2] T.P. Sathishkumar, P. Navaneethakrishnan, S. Shankar, R. Rajasekar, N. Rajini, Mech. Eng. Technol. 6 (11) (2015) 77–83.
Characterization of natural fiber and composites–A review, J. Reinf. Plast. [12] K.G. Mukherjee, K.G. Satyanrayana, Structure and properties of some vegetable
Compos. 32 (19) (2013) 1457–1476. fiber, J. Mater. Sci. 19 (2000) 3925–3934.
[3] A. Devaraju, K. Babu, A. Gnanavelbabu, Investigation on the mechanical [13] A. Devaraju, P. Sivasamy, Ganesh BabuLoganathan ‘‘Mechanical properties of
properties of coconut bunch fiber reinforced epoxy with Al2O3 nano particles polymer composites with ZnO nano-particle” Materials Today: Proceedings.
composites for structural application, Mater. Today. Proc. 5 (2018) 14252– 2019, In Press
14257. [14] A. Devaraju, and R. Harikumar, ‘‘Life Cycle Assessment of Sisal Fiber”,
[4] A. Devaraju, P. Sivasamy, Comparative analysis of mechanical characteristics of Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering,
sisal fibre composite with and without nano particles, Mater. Today Proc. 5 Encyclopedia of Renewable and Sustainable Materials” Elsevier publication,
(2018) 14362–14366. Chapter.10552, pp. 1-11, 2019
[5] P. Saravanan, A. Devaraju, Improving mechanical properties of palm sheath [15] M. Jawaid, H.A. Khalil, A.A. Bakar, Woven hybrid composites: tensile and
composites using sodium hydroxide [NaOH] treatment, Mater. Today. Proc. 5 flexural properties of oil palm-woven jute fibres based epoxy composites,
(2018) 14355–14361. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528 (15) (2011) 5190–5195.
[6] M. Jawaid, H.A. Khalil, A.A. Bakar, Mechanical performance of oil palm empty
fruit bunches/jute fibres reinforced epoxy hybrid composites, Mater. Sci. Eng.,
A 527 (29–30) (2010) 7944–7949.
Please cite this article as: A. Devaraju and P. Murali, Experimental investigation of mechanical and tribological properties of palm fiber composite with
Al2O3 ceramic particles, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.044