65nm Tech in Microwind3
65nm Tech in Microwind3
This paper describes the improvements related to the CMOS 65 nm technologies and the
implementation of this technology in Microwind3. The main novelties related to the 65 nm technology
such as enhanced strained silicon, process options and low-K dielectrics are described. The
performances of a ring oscillator and the 6-transistor static memory layout are also analyzed.
The physical gate length is slightly smaller than the technological node, as illustrated in Fig. 1. The
gate material has long been polysilicon, with silicon dioxide (SiO2) as the insulator between the gate
and the channel. The atom is a convenient measuring stick for the insulating material transistor
beneath the gate. In 90 nm, the gate oxide was consisting of about five atomic layers, equivalent to 1.2
nm in thickness. The thinner the gate oxide, the higher the transistor current and consequently the
switching speed. However, thinner gate oxide also means more leakage current. Therefore future
technology scaling are expected to be achieved by reducing leakage and improving performance using
a number of approaches including the introduction of high-K gate dielectrics with metal gates, or SOI
with multi-gate transistor architectures.
Technology addressed
1m in this application
note
0.25m
0.18m
0.13m
90nm Technology
65nm trend
100nm
120nm 45nm
70nm 32nm
50nm 22nm
35nm
10nm
Gate length
Year
At each lithography scaling, the linear dimensions are approximately reduced by a factor of 0.7, and
the areas are reduced by factor of 2. Smaller cell sizes lead to higher integration density which has
risen to nearly 1 million gates per mm2 in 90 nm technology.
The integrated circuit market has been growing steadily since many years, due to ever-increased
demand for electronic devices. The production of integrated circuits for various technologies is
illustrated over the years in Fig. 2. It can be seen that a new technology has appeared regularly each
two years, with a ramp up close to three years. The production peak is constantly increased, and
similar trends should be observed for novel technologies such as 65nm (forecast peak in 2009).
Production 45nm
65nm
90nm
130nm
0.18m
0.25m
0.35m
0. 5m
Year
The industrial 90-nm process from Intel was presented by Ghani in a paper in IEDM 2003 [2]. It
features the introduction of uniaxial tensile strain in the NMOS transistor channel and uniaxial
compressive strain in the PMOS transistor channel resulting in dramatic improvements in channel
mobility and consequently drive currents. More information about the implementation of the 90-nm
technology may be found in the Microwind application node [10].
Foundry
Feature
Intel ST Microelectronics Fujitsu Toshiba NEC
VDD (V) 1, 1.2 0.9/1.1 1-1.2 0.85 0.9-1.2
Effective gate length (nm) 35 45 30/50 30 43
1.1-
Oxide thickness (nm) 1.2 1.2 1.1-1.7 1.0
1.35
# of metal layers 8 12 up to 13
Interconnect layer
2.9 2.25~2.9 2.7 2.5~2.9
permittivity K
Reference [8] [7] [5] [3] [6]
There may exist several variants of the 65-nm process technology. One corresponds to the highest
possible speed, at the price of a very high leakage current. This technology is called “High speed” as it
is dedicated to applications for which the highest speed is the primary objective: fast microprocessors,
fast DSP, etc. This technology has not been addressed in Microwind’s 65nm rule file.
The second technological option called “General Purpose” (Fig. 3) is targeted to standard products
where the speed factor is not critical. The leakage current is one order of magnitude lower than for the
high-speed variant, with gate switching decreased by 50%.
Parasitic
leakage
current
Microwind
65nm rule file Networking
High-end
High (x 10) servers
Computing Servers
Consumer
Mobile
Computing
High speed
Moderate variant
(x 1) Digital camera 3G phones
2G phones General
Purpose variant
Personal org.
MP3
Low leakage Speed
Low variant
(x 0.1)
Parasitic
leakage
current
Microwind
65nm rule file
General
Purpose variant
High (x 10) of the 65nm
High Speed
MOS
Low leakage Optionnal MOS for
Moderate MOS high speed operation
(x 1)
Default
MOS
Speed
Low
(x 0.1)
Figure 3 : Introducing three variants of the 65nm technology(a), and two types of MOS within
each variant (b)
There may also exist a third variant called low leakage (bottom left of fig. 3-a). This variant concerns
integrated circuits for which the leakage must remain as low as possible, a criterion that ranks first in
applications such as embedded devices, mobile phones or personal organizers.
The operational voltage is usually from 0.85V to 1.2V, depending on the technology variant. In
Microwind, we decided to fix VDD at 1.0V in the cmos65nm.RUL rule file, which represents a
compromise between all possible technology variations available for this 65-nm node.
NMOS variants
We have stated earlier that neither high speed or low leakage technologies were addressed in
Microwind's 65nm rule file. Instead, Microwind uses the general purpose variant. However, at least
three MOS variants exist in the general-purpose technology, which may be confusing as they reuse
partially the technology terminology: the low-leakage MOS is the default MOS device, and the high-
speed MOS has higher switching performances but higher leakage (Figure 3-b). The third MOS option
is the high voltage MOS used for input/output interfacing. In Microwind’s cmos65nm rule file, the I/O
supply is 2.5 V.
The main objective of the low leakage MOS is to reduce the Ioff current significantly, that is the small
current that flows between drain and source with a zero gate voltage. The price to pay is a reduced Ion
current. The designer has the possibility to use high-speed MOS devices, which have high Ioff
leakages but large Ion drive currents.
Gate dielectric
Continued thickness reduction of conventional oxides such as silicon dioxide (SiO2) results in
reliability degradation and unacceptable current leakage. New dielectric materials with high
permittivity (High-“K”) are needed to replace SiO2, both for the MOS device itself and the embedded
capacitors. Silicon oxynitride (SiOxNy) has been proposed in 65nm technologies as an effective
replacement to SiO2 as the dielectric material in metal-oxide-semiconductor devices (figure 4).
Depending on the Oxygen/Nitrogen ratio, the oxynitride film dielectric permittivity may be adjusted.
Polysilicon Polysilicon
gate gate
Si02 Si0xNy
Gate Gate
oxide oxide
1.2nm 2.5nm
K=3.9 K=11.0
Source Drain Source Drain
Equivalent to 0.8nm
SiO2, which means a
Low capacitance higher capacitance
(slow device) (fast device)
High gate leakage Reduced gate leakage
Figure 4: The new gate oxide material enhances the MOS device performances in terms of switching
speed and leakage
The thickness of the SiOxNy insulator is thicker than that of SiO2, as seen on the left of figure 4. This
increased thickness leads to less leakage current. Furthermore, since the SiOxNy permittivity is much
higher than SiO2, the equivalent SiO2 oxide is thinner than 1.2 nm (around 0.8 nm in this case),
meaning a higher capacitance effect and consequently a faster switching.
Strained Silicon
The main novelty related to the 90 and 65 nm technology is the introduction of strained silicon to
speed-up the carrier mobility, which boosts both the n-channel and p-channel transistor performances.
In Intel’s the 65 nm technology [8] the channel strains in both NMOS and PMOS devices have been
improved over 90 nm technolgy. PMOS transistor channel strain has been enhanced by increasing the
Ge content in the compressive SiGe film. Both transistors employ ultra shallow source-drains to
further increase the drive currents.
Polysilicon
gate
Horizontal
Gate strain created
oxide by the silicon
nitride capping
layer
Drain Drain
Source (Si) Source (Si)
(Si) (Si)
Figure 5: Strain generated by a silicon-nitride capping layer which increases the distance between
atoms underneath the gate, which speeds up the electron mobility of n-channel MOS devices
Let us the silicon atoms forming a regular lattice structure, inside which the electrons participating to
the device current have to flow. In the case of electron carriers, stretching the lattice allows the charges
to flow faster from the drain to the source, as depicted in Fig. 5.
Gate
Horizontal
Gate pressure
oxide created by the
uniaxial SiGe
strain
Si Si SiGe SiGe
Figure 6: Compressive stain to reduce the distance between atoms underneath the gate, which speeds
up the hole mobility of p-channel MOS devices
The mobility improvement exhibits a linear dependence with the tensile film thickness. A 80 nm film
has resulted in a 10% saturation current improvement in Intel’s 90nm technology [2]. The strain may
also be applied from the bottom with a uniform layer of an alloy of silicon and germanium (SiGe).
In a similar way, compressing the lattice slightly speeds up the p-type transistor, for which current
carriers consist of holes (Fig. 6). The combination of reduced channel length, decreased oxide
thickness and strained silicon achieves a substantial gain in drive current for both nMOS and pMOS
devices.
The tool Microwind in its version 3.1 is configured by default in 65-nm technology. A cross-section of
the n-channel MOS devices is given in Fig. 7. The nMOS gate is capped with a specific silicon nitride
layer that induces lateral tensile channel strain for improved electron mobility.
50 nm effective 35 nm effective
channel channel
Imax=0.8 mA
Figure 8: Id/Vd characteristics of the Low leakage and high speed nMOS devices
The device I/V characteristics of the low-leakage and high-speed MOS devices listed in Table 3 are
obtained using the MOS model BSIM4 (See Sicard’s book [1] for more information about this model).
The cross-section of the low-leakage and high-speed MOS devices do not reveal any major difference
(Fig. 7), except a reduction of the effective channel length. Concerning the low-leakage MOS, the I/V
characteristics reported in Fig. 8 demonstrate a drive current capability around 0.8 mA for W=1.0µm
at a voltage supply of 1.0 V. For the high speed MOS, the effective channel length is slightly reduced
as well as the threshold voltage, to achieve an impressive drive current around 1.2 mA/µm.
Ioff=1 nA
Vt=0.35 V
(a) Id/Vg characteristics for low leakage MOS (W=1 µm, Leff=50 nm)
Ioff=100 nA
Vt=0.25 V
(b) Id/Vg characteristics for high speed MOS (W=1 µm, Leff=35 nm)
Figure 9: Id/Vg characteristics (log scale) of the Low leakage and high-speed nMOS devices
The drawback of the astounding high-speed MOS current drive is the leakage current which rises from
1 nA/µm (Low leakage) to 100 nA/µm (High speed), as seen in the Id/Vg curve at the X axis location
corresponding to Vg= 0 V (Fig. 9). Notice that the threshold voltage Vt is significantly higher for the
low leakage MOS than for the high speed MOS.
The PMOS drive current in this 65 nm technology is around 450 µA/µm for the low-leakage MOS and
up to 700 µA/µm for the high-speed MOS. These values (See Table 4) are not particularly high, as the
target applications for this technology is low-power embedded electronics, in contrast to Intel’s 65-nm
technology targeted to high-speed digital circuits such as microprocessors (see fig. 3 for an illustration
of 65-nm technology variants). The leakage current is remarkably low, around 1 nA/µm for the low-
leakage MOS and near 100 nA/µm for the high-speed device. The cross-section of the pMOS device
reveals an SiGe material that induces compressive strain to obtain maximum current capabilities near
0.7 mA/µm (Fig. 10).
pMOS gate
Shallow trench SiGe diffusion to
isolation (STI) induce compressive
channel strain
50 nm effective 35 nm effective
channel channel
Metal Layers
As seen in the palette (fig. 11), the available metal layers in 65nm technology range from metal1 to
metal8. The layer metal1 is situated at the lowest altitude, close to the active device, while metal8 is
nearly 10µm above the silicon surface. Metal layers are labeled according to the order in which they
are fabricated, from the lower level (metal1) to the upper level (metal8).
New layers
introduced in 65-nm
technology node
Figure 11: Microwind window with the palette of layers including 8 levels of metallization
In Microwind, specific macros are accessible to ease the addition of contacts in the layout. These
macros may be found in the palette. As an example, you may instantiate a design-error free
metal7/metal8 contact by selecting metal8, followed by a click on the upper left corner icon in the
palette. Additionally, an access to complex stacked contacts is proposed thanks to the icon "complex
contacts" situated in the palette, second row, second column. The screen reported in figure 13 appears.
By default you create a contact from poly to metal1, and from metal1 to metal2. Change the tick to
build more complex stacked contacts.
+ +
Contact
metal2..metal8
Contact
poly/metal1..metal8
Contact
P+diff/metal1..metal5
Contact
poly/metal1..metal3
Figure 14: Examples of layer connection using the complex contact command from Microwind
(Contacts.MSK)
Each layer is embedded into a low dielectric oxide (referred as interconnect layer permittivity K in
table 2) which isolates layers from each other. A cross-section of a 65nm CMOS technology is shown
in figure 14. In 65nm technology, the layers metal1..metal4 have almost identical characteristics.
Concerning the design rules, the minimum size w of the interconnect is 3 . The minimum spacing is 4
. Layers metal5 and metal6 are a little larger, while layers metal7 and metal8 are significantly thicker
and larger, to drive high currents for supplies.
3. Designing in 65 nm technology
The ring oscillator made from 5 inverters has the property of oscillating naturally. We observe in the
circuit of figure 15 the oscillating outputs and measure their corresponding frequency.
Figure 15: Schematic diagram and layout of the ring oscillator used for simulation (INV5.MSK)
The ring oscillator circuit can be simulated easily at layout level with Microwind using various
technologies. The time-domain waveform of the output is reported in figure 16 for 0.8, 0.12µm and
65nm technologies. Although the supply voltage (VDD) has been reduced (VDD is 5V in 0.8µm, 1.2V
in 0.12µm, and 1.0 V in 65nm), the gain in frequency improvement is significant.
65 nm 1.0V 30 GHz
Figure 16: Oscillation frequency improvement with the technology scale down (Inv5.MSK)
Use the command File Select Foundry to change the configuring technology. Select sequentially
the cmos08.RUL rule file which corresponds to the CMOS 0.8-µm technology, the cmos018.RUL
rule file (0.18µm technology), and eventually cmos65nm.RUL which configures Microwind to the
CMOS 65-nm technology. When you run the simulation, observe the change of VDD and the
significant change in oscillating frequency.
Let us consider the ring oscillator with an enable circuit, where one inverter has been replaced by a
NAND gate to enable or disable oscillation (Inv5Enable.MSK). The schematic diagram is shown in
figure 17, as well as its layout implementation. We analyze the switching performances in high speed
and low leakage mode.
Figure 17 : The schematic diagram and layout of the ring oscillator used to compare the analog
performances in high speed and low leakage mode (INV5Enable.MSK)
Strong consumption
(0.28 mA max)
High standby
current
Fast oscillation
(27 GHz)
Figure 18: Simulation of the ring oscillator in high speed mode. The oscillating frequency is fast but
the standby current is high (Inv5Enable.MSK)
The option layer which surrounds all the oscillator devices is set to high speed mode first by a double
click inside that box, and by selecting “high speed” (Fig. 19). The analog performances of both
options are summarized in table 5. In high speed mode, the circuit works fast (27 GHz) but consumes
a lot of power (0.28 mA) when on, and a significant standby current when off ( more than 100 nA), as
shown in the simulation of the voltage and current given figure 17. Notice the tick in front of "Scale I
in log" to display the current in logarithmic scale.
After changing the properties of the option layer to “low leakage” as shown in Fig. 19, the simulation
is performed again. In contrast to “high speed”, the low leakage mode features slower oscillation (16
GHz in figure 20, that is approximately a 40 % speed reduction), with 40 % less current when ON, and
nearly two decade less standby current when off (3 nA). In summary, low leakage MOS devices
should be used as default devices whenever possible. High speed MOS should be used only when
switching speed is critical.
Figure 19: Changing the MOS option into low leakage mode
Slow oscillation
(16GHz)
Figure 20: Simulation of the ring oscillator in low leakage mode. The oscillating frequency is slower
but the standby current is very low (Inv5Enable.MSK)
Figure 21: The 6-transistor RAM layout using 65-nm design rules (Ram6T_65nm.MSK)
4. Conclusion
This application note has illustrated the trends in CMOS technology and introduced the 65 nm
technology generation, based on technology information available from integrate circuit
manufacturers. A set of specific topics has been addressed, including the new gate dielectric material
SiON and the technique called strained silicon for enhanced mobility, the 8-metal interconnect back-
end process and the 65-nm process variants. N-channel and P-channel MOS device characteristics
have been presented, as well as a comparative study of a ring inverter oscillation for various
technologies. Finally, high speed performances have been compared to low leakage, with the impact
on speed and leakage current.
Future work will concern the 45nm and 32nm technology nodes, under preparation for an industrial
production in 2008.
References
[1] E. Sicard, S. Ben Dhia “Basic CMOS cell design”, McGraw Hill India, 450 pages, ISBN 0-07-0599335, June
2005 (international edition to appear end 2006)
[2] T. Ghani et. al. “A 90nm high volume manufacturing logic technology featuring novel 45nm gate length
strained silicon CMOS transistors”, Digest of International Electron Devices Meeting 2003, IEDM ‘03.
[3] E. Morifuji et.al., “High performance 30 nm bulk CMOS for 65 nm technology node (CMOS5)”, Digest of
International Electron Devices Meeting 2002, IEDM '02, 8-11 Dec. 2002, pp. 655 – 658.
[4] N. Yanagiya et. al., “65 nm CMOS technology (CMOS5) with high density embedded memories for
broadband microprocessor applications”, IEDM 2002, 8-11 Dec. 2002, pp. 57 – 60.
[5] S. Nakai et.al., “A 65 nm CMOS technology with a high-performance and low-leakage transistor, a 0.55 m2
6T-SRAM cell and robust hybrid-ULK/Cu interconnects for mobile multimedia applications”, IEDM 2003,
8-10 Dec. 2003, pp. 11.3.1 - 11.3.4
[6] Y. Nakahara et. al. “A robust 65-nm node CMOS technology for wide-range Vdd operation”, IEDM 2003, 8-
10 Dec. 2003, pp. 11.2.1 - 11.2.4
[7] F. Arnaud et. al. “A functional 0.69 m2 embedded 6T-SRAM bit cell for 65 nm CMOS platform”,
Symposium on VLSI Technology: Digest of Technical Papers 2003, 10-12 June 2003, pp. 65 – 66.
[8] P. Bai et.al., “A 65nm logic technology featuring 35nm gate lengths, enhanced channel strain, 8 Cu
interconnect layers, low-k ILD and 0.57 m2 SRAM cell”, IEDM 2004, 13-15 Dec. 2004, pp. 657 – 660.
[9] NanoCMOS Newsletter, Issue 1, February 2001, http://www.nanocmos-eu.com/newsletter.php
[10] E. Sicard “Introducing 90 nm technology in Microwind3”, application note, July 2005, www.microwind.org