Short Circuit Currents.
Short Circuit Currents.
Short circuit currents cleared by circuit breakers must consider this unidirectional component,
especially for shorter interrupting periods. Same DC component is important when verifying
the capability of a circuit breaker to reclose against or withstand fault currents. Fault currents
containing high current DC offsets, usually present no zero crossings in the first several cycles
right after fault introduction and are especially burdensome to the circuit breakers of large
generators.
Fault current DC decrement is also impacted by the fact that because the current existing in
the system before the fault, cannot change instantaneously, a considerable unidirectional
component may exist in the fault current which actually depends on the exact occurrence of
the short circuit. This unidirectional component of the fault current is often referred to as DC
current offset as it reduces with time exponentially. The rate of decay is related to the system
total reactance and resistance. Although this decay is quick, the DC current component could
last enough time to be detected by the protective relay equipment, particularly when fast fault
clearing is very needed to maintain system stability or prevent the damaging effects of the
fault currents.
Modelling requirements of the power system
Fault currents have dynamic aspect that is necessary to associate calculated short circuit
currents to a specific moment in time from the onset of the short circuit. AC current decrement
assessment is used to properly determine the symmetrical RMS values of the short circuit
currents, while DC decrement calculations provide the necessary DC current component of
the fault current, hence affording a correct approximation of the total short circuit current. The
total fault current, must be used for breaker and switchgear sizing and in some specific
scenarios for protective relay device coordination. Electrical system topology conditions are
evenly significant because the system arrangement and electrical closeness of the rotating
machinery to the fault location will influence the total order of magnitude of the fault current.
It is
therefore essential to come up with an electrical system model as a whole and examine it in
an accurate and computationally convenient manner.
Modern power systems are usually compromised of multiple generators and motors. They
are interlinked using other equipment like transformers, overhead lines and cables. Also there
is usually one or more locations at which a local, smaller power system is connected to a
larger electrical grid. These locations are referred to as “point of common coupling”. The main
goal of the short-circuit study is to calculate the short-circuit currents and voltages at various
locations throughout the system.
Representation of the three-phase vs. symmetrical components
It is a customary practice for conventional three-phase electrical systems to be interpreted on
a single-phase basis. Mentioned simplification, successfully applied for power flow and
transient stability studies, leans on the assumption that the electrical system is equally
balanced or can be accepted to be so for practical purposes. However, electrical system
modelling, on a single-phase basis is insufficient for examining processes that take into
account serious system imbalances. From the short-circuit analysis point of view, three-phase
fault lends itself to single-phase analysis, because the fault is balanced and asks for all three
phases, presuming a balanced three-phase electrical system. Other short circuit current
conditions will bring in imbalances that need the analysis of the remaining unaffected two
phases. There are two options to address this problem:
- Representation using symmetrical components. Analysis using symmetrical
components is a method that, instead of asking for assessment of the imbalanced
electrical system, provides provision for the creation of three electrical subsystems:
the positive, the negative, and the zero-sequence sys-tems that are correctly
connected at the short circuit point which depends on the type of the electrical system
imbalance. Once fault currents and voltages are modelled anywhere in the network,
they can be obtained by properly aggregating findings of the analysis of the three-
sequence networks.
- Representation of the system using all three-phases. If the system is represented on a three-
phase basis, the identity of all three phases is retained. The advantage of this approach is
that any kind of short circuit current imbalance can be promptly assessed, including
coincidental faults. Moreover, the short circuit current condition is defined with bigger
flexibility, especially for arcing faults. The main disadvantages of the technique are:
Three-phase fault analysis for the balanced systems requires only the positive sequence
system components impedances Z1 = (R1 + jX1). For calculation of the line-to-line faults,
negative sequence impedances Z2 = (R2 + jX2) are required. For all faults involving connection
to the ground, such as line-to-ground and double line-to-ground faults, the zero sequence
system impedances Z0 = (R0 + jX0) are required in addition to the positive and negative
systems. System neutral grounding equipment components such as grounding resistors or
reactors and grounding transformers constitute an inherent part of the impedance data for
the zero sequence system.
The analytical and calculation framework in the analytical processes prescribed by the
aforementioned standards stays algebraic and linear, and the computations are kept
easily managed by hand for small systems. The extent of the information base
necessities for computerized solutions is kept to a necessary maximum for the
solutions to be acceptably precise. This type of analyses presents the best
compromise between solution accuracy and simplicity of the simulation. The vast
majority of commercial fault analysis programs fall under this category.
IEC 60909 - International standard
Standard IEC 60909 (published in 1988) distinguishes four duty types resulting in
four different calculated short circuit currents:
"
- The initial short-circuit current I k
Although, the breaking and steady-state short circuit currents are in principal similar to the
interrupting and time-delayed short circuit currents, respectively, the peak short circuit
currents are the maximum fault currents reached during the first cycle from a beginning of a
fault’s and are importantly different from the first-cycle fault currents described in IEEE
standards, which are total asymmetrical RMS short circuit currents. The initial short-circuit
current is determined as the symmetrical RMS short circuit current would inflow to the point
of the fault if there are no changes in network impedances.
IEEE standards dealing with short circuit current calculations for medium and high voltage
electrical networks are:
- IEEE Standard 141-1993
- IEEE Standard C37.5-1979
- IEEE Standard 241-1990
There are numerous and significant differences between IEEE C37 and IEC 60909 short
circuit calculation standards. System modelling and computational techniques are different in
the two standards. Because of this results obtained by IEEE and IEC standards can be
different, with IEC 60909 generally providing higher short circuit current values. The essential
differences between IEEE and IEC short circuit calculation standards can be summarized as
follows:
- Short circuit DC current decrement described in IEC 60909 does not always rely on a single
X/R ratio. Generally, more than one X/R ratio has to be taken into account. In addition, the
notion of separate X and R networks for obtaining the X/R ratio at the location of the fault is
not applicable to IEC 60909.
- Short circuit AC current decrement considered by IEC 60909 depends on the fault location
and the standard quantifies rotating machinery’s proximity to the fault. IEEE standard
recommends system-wide modelling of the AC decrement.
- Steady-state short circuit current calculation in IEC 60909 considers excitation settings of
the synchronous machines.
- Interrupting currents
Currents that are the result of short circuit current calculations are used for medium
and high voltage systems since they operate with a time delay that is introduced by
protective relaying and operating requirements. Since IEEE Standard C37.13-1990
has adopted the symmetrical rating structure and calculates symmetrical RMS, fault
currents and X/R ratio can be considered as sufficient in the case calculated X/R ratio
is less than the X/R ratio of the test circuit of the circuit breaker. This procedure is
suitable for calculations in systems with a low voltage fuse and circuit breakers as
defined by IEEE Standard C37.13-1990.
IEEE Standard C37.010-1979 and IEEE Standard C37.5-1979 contain coefficients that can
be applied to symmetrical RMS short circuit currents in order to get asymmetrical RMS
currents. IEEE Standard C37.5-1979 defines them as total asymmetrical short circuit currents
while IEEE Standard C37.010-1979 describes fault currents that are compared against circuit
breaker interrupting capabilities. The above mentioned coefficients are obtained from curves
normalized against the circuit breaker contact opening time. In order to be in line with IEC
standards, ANSI C37.06-1987 introduced peak fault current to the preferred ratings as an
alternative to total asymmetrical currents.
- Is located two or more transformations away from the point of the fault.
Generally, it needs to be pointed out that the most important step in the calculations of the
total fault currents for the medium and high voltage circuit breakers is deciding which part
of the total short circuit current comes from “local” and “remote” sources in order to obtain
a meaningful estimate of the circuit breaker interrupting requirements. This distinction is
reasoned by the fact that currents from remote sources introduce slower AC current decay
or do not introduce it comparing to short circuit currents from the local sources.