GIS for Urban Planning and Safety
GIS for Urban Planning and Safety
net/publication/327225843
CITATION READS
1 20,802
1 author:
Madhavan Dhanabalan
Bharathidasan University
20 PUBLICATIONS 3 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Madhavan Dhanabalan on 25 August 2018.
strong argument is towards the regional planning than on the area was usually considered to be homogenous, assuming that
piecemeal development. The present case study proposes a all the attributes of the space are evenly distributed within
new town based on the regional planning approach which their respective areas. That is, the two dimensional modelling
takes the region as a whole with its town and its hinterland. In linked each component of the space with specific information,
his book especially with the emergence of computing technology. In
the 1960s, spatial urban modelling took advantage of
[Link] CHEYYUR advances in the computer sciences to develop coarse and
The town Cheyyur has an interesting and important empirical models from small scale to large scale. These
attribute of its locational advantage. It is located between the models introduced new approaches to urban modelling.
two strong magnets Chennai and Pondicherry. It is well The work of Von Thünen in 1826, Ravenstein between 1885-
connected through the National Highway and State Highways. 89, and later Weber, Christaller, and Ulman pioneered spatial
the sprawl of Chennai has extended much in the south eastern modelling in the social sciences. However, the earlier models
direction .This sprawl region has the IT Corridor of Chennai were severely criticized as "largely descriptive" (Wilson,
,which houses the maximum number of IT &ITES companies 2000, p.57), and treated the city as a centralized node with
.It is anticipated to grow further also Cheyyur is in closer little interaction (gravity model) within the components of the
proximity to this IT corridor. The rich and fertile soil, back zone or space. Also, traditional models were too coarse and
waters, excellent groundwater table, land availability, good lacked detailed data, their representation was 'primitive'
rail and road connectivity are some of the key attributes in (Wegener, 2000) and the elements of space were not
developing Cheyyur. interconnected
Stages in the urban planning models
Of course, urban models come in many flavours. These range VI. URBAN SIMULATION
in variety from basic to mathematical in character, with a Urban simulation aims to improve the understanding of
respective diversity of theoretical foundations, purposes, and urban evolution and to predict urban changes. To do so, urban
functionality of use. They may be classified into three main dynamics seek to represent evolutionary patterns of the city
groups: scale, analogue, and conceptual. over time and space. It is generally argued that although
Scale models are amongst the most well known traditional large-scale urban simulation approaches of the
models. Broadly speaking, they are scaled-down 1960s were based on solid theories, they had significant
versions of reality, usually without any functional or weaknesses such as poor handling of space-time dynamics,
predictive capacity. they were impractical, their representation of data was too
In analogue models, size is transformed, but so are coarse and their 'top-down' approach ultimately failed to
some of the properties of the thing that is actually reproduce realistic simulations of urban systems.
being modeled. The most familiar analogue model, Current urban simulation approaches are taking advantage of
in a geographic sense, is the map. Here size is progress in information technology, data availability and
reduced (as with the scale model), but so also are complex theories (such as cellular automata and artificial
some of the properties of the thing being modeled. intelligence) to address the criticisms raised by previous urban
A conceptual model generally expresses how we dynamics modeling attempts.
think a system works. Usually, conceptual models To be useful and realistic, however, urban models require
are presented as arrows that illustrate links or 'real-world' data such as existing spatial and tangible urban
relationships, and boxes representing system patterns that can be integrated and mapped in a modelling
components. scenario. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have
In the early spatial models such as central place theory, emerged as a prime framework for the management of a range
attributes were treated separately and then aggregated. The of spatial real world data. Efforts to use GIS as a modelling
tool have, however, been received with scepticism, especially makers with required information about the current state of
because GIS is rigid, has limited modelling functionalities, development and the nature of changes that have occurred.
and poorly handles the temporal dynamic dimension. Cellular Remote sensing and Geographical Information system (GIS)
Automata (CA) that were developed in the 1940s to explore provides vital tools which can be applied in the analysis at the
complex behaviour and systems, are now progressively being district and as well as at the city level.
adopted and adjusted to address some modelling weaknesses TABLE 1
that varies from 1-9. The relative importance of each of the TABLE 3
above thematic maps on vulnerability is reflected in terms of
weights .these ratings and weights are used in arriving the
Land Use Land cover Map WEIGHTAGE – 10
LAND SUITABILITY INDEX, which is calculated using the
following formula RANK
[Link] Type RANK WEIG
HT
Land Suitability Index = GEOL (WxR) + GRWA (WxR) Agricultural
+ LUSE (WxR) +SOIL (WxR) 1 Land/Croplands/Degraded 1 10
+SLOP (WxR) Forest/Build up lands/ Water bodies
Fallow / Harvested land/hills/barren
Rankings were given to attribute and its relative weightage is 2
rock/ stony waste/ Sheet rock
4 40
arrived. (Refer Tables 1-5)
3 Salt pan/salt affected lands 3 30
The final score for the five zones are arrived and using the
AHP model the, best suitable zone is finalized and the suitable 4 Sand inland / coastal 2 20
land use is assigned.
Rank, Weight and scores for attributes for various 5 Upland with or without Scrub 5 50
Themes with respect to Soil condition:
FIG.3
FIG.1
TABLE 4
TABLE 2
Soil Map WEIGHTAGE – 7
5 Out Crop 1 8
6 Water Bodies 6 48
FIG.4
FIG.2
TABLE 5 With these values the model is checked for its consistency
using the AHP Model . Relative ranking is given on the same
Slope WEIGHTAGE – 6
order of the range i.e. 0-66 is given the highest priority- the
[Link] Type RANK RANKWEIGHT value – extreme importance in the nine point scale
1 <10M 1 6
Intensity of
2 50 – 150 M 5 30 [Link] RANGE Definition
importance
Extreme
1 0-66 9
importance
Very strong
2 67- 101 7
importance
Strong
3 102-133 5
Importance
Moderate
4 134-163 3
importance
Equal
5 164-209 1
importance
FIG.5
Thus the zones were analyzed using this AHP and the
Note: As the terrain is not undulating only two variables are
appropriate land use is [Link] model holds good for
taken, other wise based on the terrain the number of attributes
any urban simulation as the relative ranking is done – one
can be increased .The suitable land zone is selected based on
attribute is not just checked with other but with all the other
the range of the related weightage. The range 0-66 is
attributes.
considered as the least priority zone where as the range 164-
Conclusion
209 has the Best priority.
IX. SUITABLE LAND ZONE
X. CONCLUSION
TABLE 6 Urban planning is a very intense exercise that involves lot
[Link] RANGE SCORE of related fields. First generation of the planners had a
1 0-66 Priority – 5 zone common platform with sociologists, economists and related
2 67- 101 Priority – 4 zone designers. The second generation became a step advanced
3 102-133 Priority – 3 zone with the advent of GIS – which has proven itself as a very
4 134-163 Priority – 2 zone strong tool. The present third generation urban planning trend
5 164-209 Priority – 1 zone takes the utmost benefits of the information technology,
decision making systems, and simulation models and applies
it with the GIS models. Thus GIS is now not only a tool for
capturing and analyzing data, but much ahead of it in taking
exclusive land related decisions too .The GGLSS Model of
urban design for Cheyyur Taluk, Kancheepuram Dt using GIS
has been successfully conducted.
1. The data is well created such that upgrading is easier.
2. User can quickly identify Natural and Environmental
features by simple querying.
FIG.6
3. Created with database can be used for Land Value data redundancy and simplifying the
cost related Tax Collection, Billing, and other model/management process.
related purpose.
4. Using a GIS you can enter new data or modify REFERENCES
existing data. This example shows a GIS interface
[1] Lynch, Kevin, Image of the city, MIT Press.
that allows easy editing of geographic data and the
[2] Urban Development Plan Formulation and Implementation guidelines
display of related documents. [3] GIS [Link]
5. This product provides GIS users with an interface [4] [Link]
tool for analysis for Urban Planning. Key concepts [5] [Link]