0% found this document useful (0 votes)
112 views6 pages

Land Dispute Suit in Rawalpindi Court

The plaintiffs, AllahDad Khan and Mst. Ghulam Fatima, filed a suit against Muhammad Shakeel, Azhar Hussain, Qaisar Abbas, and the Patwari of Revenue Circle Pariyal. The suit is for declaration of ownership, partition of jointly owned land, and permanent and mandatory injunctions. The plaintiffs allege that while they sold a portion of banjar (uncultivated) land to defendant Qaisar Abbas, due to a technical error the entire jointly owned land was recorded as being transferred, when only the banjar portions were intended to be sold. The plaintiffs seek declarations affirming their ownership of the remaining portions, and injunctions preventing interference with their possession and use
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
112 views6 pages

Land Dispute Suit in Rawalpindi Court

The plaintiffs, AllahDad Khan and Mst. Ghulam Fatima, filed a suit against Muhammad Shakeel, Azhar Hussain, Qaisar Abbas, and the Patwari of Revenue Circle Pariyal. The suit is for declaration of ownership, partition of jointly owned land, and permanent and mandatory injunctions. The plaintiffs allege that while they sold a portion of banjar (uncultivated) land to defendant Qaisar Abbas, due to a technical error the entire jointly owned land was recorded as being transferred, when only the banjar portions were intended to be sold. The plaintiffs seek declarations affirming their ownership of the remaining portions, and injunctions preventing interference with their possession and use
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

IN THE COURT OF LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

RAWALPINDI
1. AllahDad Khan son

2. Mst. Ghulam Fatima widow of Fazaldad Khan R/O Pariyal, P.O. Khas,

Tehsil & District Rawalpindi.

…………. Plaintiff

V E R S U S

1. Muhammad Shakeel son of Muhammad Bashir

2. Azhar Hussain son of Ameer Afsar, R/O village Pariyal P.O. Khas,

Tehsil and District Rawalpindi.

3. Qaisar Abbas son of Dabeer Hussain R/O Chakdaniyal Koliyan Hameed,

Tehsil and District Rawalpindi.

4. Patwari Revenue Circle Pariyal, Tehsil & Distt. Rawalpindi.

……….Defendants

SUIT FOR DECLARATION, PARTITION,PERMANENT AND

MANDATORY INJUNCTION

Respectfully Sheweth:-

1. That the plaintiffs were owners in possession of land falling in Khasra

Khewat no. 958 comprising of 5 Khasra numbers, i.e., 5021 measuring

20 Kanal 8 Marlas ( ), 5027 measuring 1 Kanal 13 Marla ( ),

5026 measuring 01 Kanal 16 Marlas ( ), 5984 measuring 2 Kanal

15 Marlas ( ) and 5982 measuring 2 Kanal 5 Marlas ( )

total measuring 28 Kanal and 17 Marlas in revenue circle Pariyal, tehsil

and district Rawalpindi.

2. That the plaintiff sold Banjar Land measuring 05 Kanals from above

mentioned Khewat Number 958 comprising of Khasra No 5984

measuring 2 Kanal 15 Marlas ( ) and 5982 measuring 2 Kanal 5

Marlas ( ) to Defendant No. 3 vide mutation No. 521 dated


01-03-2019 but due to lack of technicalities, the said Khasra Nos.

could not be mentioned specifically in said mutation and the land was

mentioned as Salam Khewat i.e., from whole khewat inadvertedly. Due

to this error defendants No. 3 became co- owner in whole khewat,

whereas only Banjar land was sold specifically and physical possession

was handed over to above mentioned specific Khasra numbers. The

affidavits of witnesses of mutation number 521 are attached

herewith.

3. That the plaintiffs are in physical possession of land falling in Khasra

Numbers 5021 measuring 20 Kanal 8 Marlas ( ), 5027

measuring 1 Kanal 13 Marla ( ), 5026 measuring 01 Kanal 16

Marlas ( ) within their entitlement and share. It is

pertinent to mention here that the plaintiffs had constructed a

residential house, grave of deceased predecessor of plaintiffs,

allocated site for mosque and whole land is fenced on spot.

4. That the defendant No. 3 sold out said land to Defendant No 1 and 2

vide mutation no. 1110 dated 07-03-2022. The fact of transfer of

Banjar land was also not mentioned in the said mutation. The

defendant no 1 and 2 after purchase, without lawful authority or title

are threatening to interfere in lawful possession of the plaintiffs,

hence this suit.

5. That defendant No. 1 & 2 are trying to transfer, the portion

exclusively in possession of plaintiffs, of joint property without being

partitioned by meet and bounds by using their influence illegally and

unlawfully.

6. That the defendants are threatening to encroach upon the legally

owned and possessed property of plaintiffs and are trying to


depriving the plaintiffs from their legal right to possess and to use

the same for their personal beneficial use.

7. That the plaintiffs approached defendant No. 1 & 2 through

respectable of family and asked them to refrain from their illegal

designs and not to deprive plaintiffs from their legal rights, but they

refused to listen the genuine request of the plaintiffs.

8. That the cause of action accrued to plaintiffs two weeks ago when

defendant no 1 & 2 tried to dispossess the plaintiffs from suit

property by way of damaging fence, the plaintiffs asked the

defendant No. 1 & 2 to refrain from their illegal designs and the same

was refused.

9. That major portion of property comprise of constructed house and

fall within urban area and the rest is agricultural, hence this

honorable court has the jurisdiction to entertain the suit.

10. That the property is situated in the territorial jurisdiction of this

honorable court and the cause of action accrued in the jurisdiction of

this honorable court hence this honorable court has the jurisdiction to

entertain the suit.

11. That the value of suit for purposes of jurisdiction and court fee is Rs.

20,000/- which is exempted from court fee.

P R A Y E R

Under the circumstances stated above, it is therefore

respectfully prayed firstly, that a decree for declaration to

the effect that the plaintiffs sold only banjar land to

defendant no 3 comprising of Khasra numbers 5984

measuring 2 Kanal 15 Marlas ( ) and 5982

measuring 2 Kanal 5 Marlas ( ) in khewat number


958 Revenue Circle Pariyal Thesil & District Rawalpindi

vide mutation Number 521 and the defendants have no

right and title in any manner what so ever in remaining

Khasra numbers of said khewat. A decree for partition be


passed and the said joint property be partitioned by meets and

bounds; A decree for permanent injunction to refrain the

defendants from interfering into peaceful possession of

plaintiffs and dispossessing from lawful owned and possessed

land of plaintiffs or alienating or changing the nature of

property; and lastly, a decree for mandatory injunction

directing defendant No. 1 & 2 to remove all building materials

and all constructions if raised any on joint property, may be

passed in favor of the Plaintiffs and against defendants, in the

best interest of the justice.

Plaintiff

Through

VERIFICATION Taimoor Waheed Malik


Advocate High Court
st
Verified on oath at Rawalpindi on this 1 day of August-2022, that Rawalpindi
the contents of para No.1 to 6 are true and correct to the best of

my knowledge and belief and rest of the paras are believed to be

true upon information received.

Plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE RAWALPINDI

Allah Dad Khan etc. V E R S U S Muhammad Shakeel etc.

SUIT FOR DECLARATION, PARTITION,PERMANENT AND MANDATORY INJUNCTION


APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 & 2 READ
WITH SECTION 151 CPC

Respectfully Sheweth:

1. That the applicant has filed above titled suit before


this Honorable Court today, the contents of which may
kindly be read as integral part of this application.

2. That for the reasons stated in the plaint, the applicant


has a strong prima facie case and hopes to succeed in it.

3. That the balance of convenience also lies in his favor.

4. That if the respondents are not restrained from their


illegal and nefarious designs, the applicant shall suffer
an irreparable loss.

It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that the instant


application may kindly be accepted and respondents be
restrained to alienate, transfer or make improvements in any
manner whatsoever in the suit land and be directed to
maintain status quo till the final disposal of the suit.

Applicant.
Through:

Taimoor Waheed Malik


Advocate High Court.
Rawalpindi
IN THE COURT OF LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE RAWALPINDI

Allah Dad Khan etc. V E R S U S Muhammad Shakeel etc.

SUIT FOR DECLARATION, PARTITION,PERMANENT AND MANDATORY INJUNCTION

APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 & 2 READ WITH SECTION 151

CPC

A F F I D A V I T

I, AllahDad Khan son of Fazaldad Khan R/O Pariyal, P.O. Khas, Tehsil &

District Rawalpindi., do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:-

That the contents of accompanied plaint are true and correct to the

best of my knowledge and belief and in case of any concealment, all

the consequences will be borne by the deponent.

Deponent __________

Verified on oath at Rawalpindi on this 1st day of August 2022, that the

contents of abovesaid affidavit are true and correct to the best of my

knowledge and belief.

Deponent __________

You might also like