© Copyright 2020 | Lexlife India Pvt. Ltd.
Evolution of IPR as a branch of law
What is Intellectual Property?
At first glance, IPR seems to paint a vivid picture as an intricate branch of
law. But you will be surprised to know, as you shall read the module, that
how closely you have come across the superficial element of the subject in
daily course of life. We are well aware of the fact that song writers, music
composers and an author of books own their work.
What does this ownership signify? The ownership implies that the person
responsible for his work has absolute right over it. No one can make use of
the work, unless due consideration of his work is granted. In layman terms,
if you are willing to make use of their work, you ought to render your
consideration in return.
Let’s take an example; when you buy a soft drink owned by Coca-Cola, a
part of our payment goes back to Coca-Cola as a reimbursement for the
time and resources that they have invested in research and development for
creation of the product.
This has led to the development of industries such as the music industry
thriving worldwide and encouraging new faces to generate more and more
creative ideas.
Page 1 of 21
© Copyright 2020 | Lexlife India Pvt. Ltd.
In order to understand the true nature of intellectual property, it is
imperative that we start with a formal definition. Intellectual property
refers to the legal rights that result from intellectual activity in the
industrial, scientific, literary and artistic fields.
In common parlance, the term ‘property’ carries the same meaning as is
understood en masse. The significant feature that most types of property
have in common is that the person having the ownership of a property is
free to use his/her property as they deem fit, provided that use is in
consonance with the law of the land.
Now that we have understood the general connotation of property, let’s roll
back to the significance of property in IPR. The term property in IPR is
reserved for types of property that ensue from creations of the human
intellect including creativity concepts, inventions, industrial models,
trademarks, songs, literature, symbols, names, brands et cetera.
Page 2 of 21
© Copyright 2020 | Lexlife India Pvt. Ltd.
IPR can be categorized under following heads:
1. Literary, artistic and scientific works.
2. Performances and broadcasts.
3. Inventions (in any field).
4. Industrial designs.
5. Trademarks, company names and logos.
6. Unfair competition practices.
Page 3 of 21
© Copyright 2020 | Lexlife India Pvt. Ltd.
Significance of IPR
Let’s take an example; ‘A’ has invented a device that is of great
significance in the Automobile industry. Now if the car manufacturers are
willing to make use of his device in-order to maximize the efficacy of their
product, they must contact ‘A’.
The willingness of the car companies to make use of A’s device must be
backed with some consideration. Intellectual Property Rights ensures that
A’s product is not used by the car company without honouring his right.
From the above-mentioned example, inference can be drawn that rendering
protection to intellectual property encourages industries whose work is
based on intellectual creation. IPR ensures financial returns to the people
who put consistent effort in creation such work.
For instance, Medical Electronics Industry allocates a major chunk of its
profit to research and development. The investment made in developing a
medical device runs into millions of dollars. This lends credence to the fact
that protection of IP rights is imperative for smooth functioning of such
industries.
Henceforth, conclusion can be drawn that protection of IP laws is
beneficial for companies in industries like medical electronics and
automobile, inter alia.
Page 4 of 21
© Copyright 2020 | Lexlife India Pvt. Ltd.
Origin of IPR Jurisprudence
Since time immemorial, the need to preserve the rights of owners of
property was felt. Many times, laws were made by the king to protect them.
But this property was mostly tangible property. It was only around 500
BCE that we observe efforts being made by the sovereign to protect
intellectual property rights as well.
The first documented evidence about the formal protection of intellectual
property rights comes from Sybaris; a Greek state established in 720 BC in
the Gulf of Taranto in Southern Italy. There, around 500 BC, any “new
refinement in luxury” was recognized as an intellectual property of the
creator. This right was in the nature of a patent.
Over centuries after that, the details about intellectual property rights have
changed. They have become much more specific when it comes to
technicalities. However, the basic intent has remained constant throughout
the history of jurisprudence. And that intent is to preserve the brain-child
of a person as his property for exclusive use. Thus, allowing creators to
reap the benefits of their creativity.
After 500 BC, documented evidence about protection of intellectual
property rights are few and far apart throughout history. The next notable
instance is that of ‘Statute of Monopolies’ passed in 1623 in Britain. This
Page 5 of 21
© Copyright 2020 | Lexlife India Pvt. Ltd.
famous legislation was a big leap forward when it comes to formal
protection of intellectual property rights.
In Britain, prior to 1623, all industries followed the guild-system. A guild
is a formal alliance of merchants who practice trade or business in a
particular region. These guilds had monopoly in their respective fields. All
new innovations in goods and services were brought about through these
guilds only. Individual ownership of new ideas was out of the question.
However, the ‘Statute of Monopolies’ dramatically altered this viewpoint.
Earlier, the guilds exercised ownership and production rights over a new
invention, even if they played no role in its creation. The statute extended
such ownership rights to the creators now. Government-sanctioned guilds
no longer exercised monopoly in that regard.
After that, another landmark legislation in the field of intellectual property
came about in 1710 in Britain. It was the ‘Statute of Anne’. This stature is
also referred to as the ‘Copyright Act, 1710’. It is still regarded as the first
legal document providing for government protection of copyrights through
executive and judicial system.
The said statute was primarily focused on literary work. The law provided
the authors intellectual property right over their original content in the form
of copyright. Copyright means an exclusive legal right for the commercial
use of a piece of intellectual work. The statute granted copyright for 14
years, which could be renewed for another such term.
Page 6 of 21
© Copyright 2020 | Lexlife India Pvt. Ltd.
Nature, scope and purpose of IPR
Intellectual property has its own distinctive features. These unusual
features help us to distinguish IP rights from other kinds of properties.
These features can be listed as follows:
1) Exclusive right of owner: Owner has an exclusive right over her
creation. The owner has an inherent right as far as the work of the
owner is concerned. The inherent right of ownership is a symbolic
representation of the fact that the person is not stripped off his right
to make use of his work without honouring (consideration) the
efforts put in by her.
2) Allocation of Rights: IP rights can be allocated by way of license.
That is, intellectual property rights can be bought, sold, or licensed.
3) Divisible (Fragmentation): The quintessence of intellectual
property lies in its territorial nature, that is, intellectual property is
an inexhaustible resource. Let’s take an example, an inventor who
has registered a patent in India, can make use of his invention in
India, license it in United States of America and assign it in Sweden.
In layman terms, people around the globe can have legally protected
Page 7 of 21
© Copyright 2020 | Lexlife India Pvt. Ltd.
interest generated from the intellectual creation of the originator
without affecting his interest.
4) International conformity on IPR: As far as IPR is concerned, there
is no conformity among the nations. The intellectual creation of a
person has to be secured under respective jurisdictions as per the
respective municipal laws of the nations. In the same manner the due
process of registration and enforcement are regulated by the national
laws of the country.
5) International instrument on IP rights: Paris Convention, Berne
Convention and TRIPS lay down the regulations to ensure that
creators and inventors are provided with protection in foreign land.
6) Principle of Exhaustion: This doctrine was laid down in the case
of Consten & Grunding v. Commission (1966). Exhaustion principle
enunciates that after the first sale by the right holder, his/her rights
cease to exist. Henceforth, once an IPR holder sells his product, he
can no longer thwart the subsequent resale of the product.
Page 8 of 21
© Copyright 2020 | Lexlife India Pvt. Ltd.
Scope of Intellectual Property Rights
The scope of IPR is very wide. However, for all practical purposes, these are
generally understood to be under the following heads:
Patents: If a person invents a thing, he has the right to use it either for
personal purposes or to use in the market for profit. He can also sell this
right to someone else for a consideration. This right is in the nature of a
patent, which establishes a monopoly for a fixed period of time.
Copyright: Any original piece of work or a new point of view over an
existing work is protected by copyright. It includes within its ambit the
works of the likes of authors, historians, scientists and dancers. Copyright
has gained great importance in the internet era.
Trademark: When a business sells a good or service using a particular
pictorial representation, font, etc; it becomes a part of its identity, i.e., it
becomes a trademark and is protected by IPR. For example, people
recognize Coca-Cola drink by just looking at the font, so ‘Coca-Cola’
written in that font is a trademark.
Trade secrets: Business-persons might want to keep certain information
secret. For example, a chef may want to keep his recipe secret, or a
homeopathic medicine company may want to keep its formula secret. Such
secrets are protected by IPR to some extent.
Page 9 of 21
© Copyright 2020 | Lexlife India Pvt. Ltd.
Purpose of IPR
Every legislation is designed to serve a particular function in society. The
need for it is felt in long before it is formally enacted. Hence, every concept
of law has a purpose. Following this suit, let us now examine the purposes
served by IPR jurisprudence in society.
First of all, let us consider a society which does not protect intellectual
property rights. A business owner creates a new product with his own
research and development team. The product is being sold in the market.
Without IPR, his product can be easily copied by his competitors and sold
in the market. This would deprive the person of the fruits of his labour.
Therefore, intellectual property rights are instrumental to the economic
progress of a society. It gives legitimacy to the ownership rights of an
inventor or creator of a new product. In a free market, such legitimacy is
essential to instil a sense of security.
Intellectual property rights encourage the outreach of innovation in society
as they ensure that the creator receives due credit for her work. If such
protection is not there, innovators will be hesitant to go public with their
work, hence depriving the innovation of reaching its maximum utility.
Page 10 of 21
© Copyright 2020 | Lexlife India Pvt. Ltd.
IPR puts in place a formal mechanism for distribution of an innovation in
a free market while awarding due credit to the innovator. For instance, ‘A’
designs a new kind of battery which makes a phone last longer. Now, he
can patent the product and a mobile phone company can pay him to use the
battery design.
Another important purpose of IPR is the protection of artistic values in
society. Any piece of art, like music composition, painting, motion picture,
is protected by IPR. This protection is vital for growth in artistic fields.
Page 11 of 21
© Copyright 2020 | Lexlife India Pvt. Ltd.
IPR under Public International Law
Intellectual property rights are territorial in nature. This means that the IPR
laws of one country do not apply to any other country per se. This creates
a problematic situation as in the current era of globalization,trips a creator’s
IPR needs to be protected in other countries as well.
Multinational companies (MNCs) are gaining prominence all over the
world. MNCs create employment for crores of people globally. They need
IPR protection beyond the boundary of the country of their origin in order
to perform economic functions in a safe environment.
For this reason, intellectual property rights are gradually becoming more
and more important in Public International Law (PIL). Two major
conventions form the substantive part of IPR in PIL. These are the Paris
Convention of 1883 and the Berne Convention of 1886.
Page 12 of 21
© Copyright 2020 | Lexlife India Pvt. Ltd.
Paris Convention (1883)
Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property was a trailblazer
in the field of international protection of IPR. It was signed in Paris, France
on 20th March, 1883. It has 177 parties to it. This convention has the
following four salient features.
1. Doctrine of national treatment: Every country which is a party to this
convention will have to protect the intellectual property rights of
citizens of other countries in the same manner as it protects that of its
own citizens (articles 2 and 3).
2. Union priority right: If a person files an IPR application in a country
after filing it in some other country, the effective date of filing it will be
the date of application in first country; for both countries. Provided that
the gap should be within 1 year for utility models and within 6 months
for trademarks and industrial designs (article 4).
3. Temporary protection: Items (eligible for IPR protection) displayed
at recognized international exhibitions should be granted temporary
IPR protection in respective territories (article 11).
4. Mutual independence: Countries that are party to the convention are
mutually independent when it comes to IPR registration in their
respective jurisdictions. Countries need not follow IP laws of any other
country while processing requests of foreign origin (articles 4 & 6).
Page 13 of 21
© Copyright 2020 | Lexlife India Pvt. Ltd.
Berne Convention (1886)
Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works was a
landmark international convention on IPR. Its primary focus is copyright
protection. It was signed on 9th September, 1886 in Berne, Switzerland.
This convention also has 177 parties to it.
Berne convention brought about a change in the way a copyright is
recognized. It established that a copyright is in place as soon as a creator
finishes her work. It effectively means that a copyright is recognized even
before it is formally registered.
This convention also established that a country should recognize the
copyright of creators belonging to other countries which are a party to this
convention as well. This provision has made protection of copyright an
international right rather than merely territorial.
Page 14 of 21
© Copyright 2020 | Lexlife India Pvt. Ltd.
Critical analysis
If we take a closer look at both the conventions (Paris and Berne), we shall
come to terms with the bone of contention that has been articulated in these
conventions. The central theme in these conventions is the cardinal
principle of ‘national treatment’.
As mentioned above, ‘national treatment’ implies that a country shall
provide to the citizens of other country the same protection as they provide
to their own citizens.
Be that as it may, the doctrine of national treatment has its fair share of
discrepancies. The solutions enunciated by the conventions fail to address
the very essence of the issue.
Let’s take an example, country ‘X’ regulates its IP laws in a way that makes
registration of patent mandatory in order to reap the benefits out of his/her
product. Due to such regulations, ‘A’, a citizen of country ‘Y’, whose
product has a market in country ‘X’ shall be compelled to endure the cost
of registration to protect his right in country ‘X’, even though country ‘Y’
has no such regulations for patent registration.
After going through the example, we can draw inference to the fact that the
conventions fail to create homogeneity among the countries, making it
mandatory to regularize the IP laws in such a manner so that every country
is on equal footing as far as IP laws are concerned.
Page 15 of 21
© Copyright 2020 | Lexlife India Pvt. Ltd.
TRIPS (1995)
Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) which came
into existence on 1st January, 1995 addresses the discrepancies faced by the
Paris and Berne Conventions. TRIPS agreement necessitates members of
World Trade Organisations (WTO) to give cognizance to the established
standard of protection provided by Paris and Berne Conventions.
World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), in its bid to regularize
Intellectual Property Rights throughout the globe has formulated two new
treaties, viz., WIPO Copyright Treaty 1996 and WIPO Performances
and Phonograms Treaty 1996. Both the treaties have played their role in
developing and propagating new intellectual property rights in the
international arena.
Recent advancements lend credence to the ever-changing world of
Intellectual Property Law. The paradigm shift in the IP rights has led to the
standardization and universality around the globe.
Page 16 of 21
© Copyright 2020 | Lexlife India Pvt. Ltd.
Development of IPR in India
Prior to independence
The development of intellectual property laws in India started way back in
the colonial era itself. Therefore, just like most of the other substantive
laws in India, intellectual property laws are also greatly influenced by
English jurisprudence.
British parliament enacted a charter (a formally recognized document that
provides the authority to do something) in 1833. This charter provided for
the formation of a Law Commission. Its stated purpose was the
harmonisation of Indian laws into a unified system.
Lord Macaulay presided over the first such Law Commission as chairman
which was formed in 1835. Inter alia, he made a recommendation to East
India company to incorporate intellectual property laws in India.
Therefore, the Patents Act was introduced in 1856.
After that, many important laws regarding intellectual property rights were
passed. The list included Indian Trade and Merchandise Marks Act of
1884, Indian Patents and Designs Act of 1911 and Indian Copyright Act of
1914. This trend continued after Independence.
Page 17 of 21
© Copyright 2020 | Lexlife India Pvt. Ltd.
TRIPS compliance
Trade Related Aspects of International Law Agreement (TRIPS) came into
existence on 1st January, 1995. It addresses the discrepancies faced by the
Paris and Berne Conventions. TRIPS agreement necessitates members of
World Trade Organisation (WTO) to give cognizance to the established
standard of protection provided by Paris and Berne Conventions.
Since 1995, intellectual property laws have been modified from time to
time to some extent in order to bring the regime in compliance with TRIPS.
This is because under TRIPS, a 10-year ‘transition period’ was granted to
India for this task. That period ended in 2005.
Some examples of the changes introduced are: Patent Amendment Act,
2005; the Design Act, 2000; Trademarks Act 1999, The Geographical
Indication of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999.
All these changes were major steps taken by Indian government to bring
India in compliance with provisions of TRIPS agreement. However, it is a
widely recognized fact that India is still in the ‘transition phase’ and has
not brought its IPR regime in total compliance with TRIPS yet.
Page 18 of 21
© Copyright 2020 | Lexlife India Pvt. Ltd.
Tek Chand Committee
Intellectual Property Rights in India has under gone numerous changes
since its inception in 1856—Patent Act of 1856. Be that as it may,
implementation of recommendation made by Tek Chand Committee is
considered to have revolutionized the IP rights in India by shaping the law
in accordance with the domestic needs of India.
The Tek Chand Committee was established in the year 1948 by a resolution
of the Government of India dated 1st of October, 1949. The committee was
appointed to review the IP laws hitherto.
The Committee was presided over by Dr. Bakshi Tek Chand, a retired
Judge of the High Court of Lahore, and consisted of six others. It included
Shri Rama Pai, former Controller of Patents as a Member-Secretary.
Tek Chand Committee submitted its report in August, 1949, proposing
amendment of the Patents and Design Act, 1911 with immediate effect.
Committee was of the view that provisions making licensing mandatory
has led to abuse of patent monopolies in India.
Page 19 of 21
© Copyright 2020 | Lexlife India Pvt. Ltd.
The recommendation made by the committee was accepted by the
Government which ensued in the amendment of sections 22, 23 and 23A
to 23G of the Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911.
Based on the Committee’s report, Patent Bill, 1953 was introduced,
nevertheless, the Bill lapsed in 1957.
Ayyangar Committee was formed in the year 1957 under the chairmanship
of Rajagopala Ayyangar. It submitted a report in the year 1959. The
Government of India took cognizance of the recommendations made by
the Committee and introduced the Patent Bill of 1965.
The Patent Bill of 1965 was further amended in 1967, which was
subsequently enacted as the Patent Bill of 1970. Hence, the report greatly
contributed to the advancement of Intellectual Property Rights in India.
Page 20 of 21
© Copyright 2020 | Lexlife India Pvt. Ltd.
Development post TRIPS
IP law in India marked a significant phase after India’s inclusion in World
Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995. After the paradigm shift in India’s
Intellectual Property law, a series of amendment acts were passed to ensure
that the municipal laws of India remain in consonance with TRIPS.
1999: First amendment with respect to TRIPS was made with retrospective
effect. The objective of this amendment was to provide interim protection
to inventions relating to pharmaceutical products. Amendment also renders
an exclusive right for such products.
2002 amendment: Incorporation of second set of TRIPS obligations took
place. That is, extension of term of patents to 20 years and reversal of
burden of proof, inter alia.
2005 amendment: It was a major step towards TRIPS compliance. Patents
in all fields of technology including chemical, food, drugs etc were granted.
Page 21 of 21