School Library Collection Guide
School Library Collection Guide
I. RATIONALE
The Learning Resource Center (LRC) together with the Instructional Media Center (IMC), and the Archives Services Center (ASC)
play a significant role in the academic institution. These are centers where print and non-print materials are carefully selected,
organized to provide useful information.
For the past years, we have improved our collection and make sure that necessary informational materials are available to support
instruction, fulfill the research needs of Saint John Community and support the informational needs of library users. The purpose of
these program is to provide consistency among the persons responsible for collection management. The librarian works collaboratively
with faculty and users to provide information resources, in various formats, that will support the curriculum and academic programs of
the school.
II. CONDITION
The School Library is housed on the 1st floor of the LRC building which made accessible to the school community. It is well
ventilated, well lighted. It has enough space to accommodate its users and has space for its collections.
The Instructional Media Center is located on the 3rd floor of the same building where non-print materials and learning equipment
are kept. It has a space for viewing purposes which accommodate 50-80 persons.
The Archives Service Center is located at the Administrative Building beside the office of the registrar. It housed the historical
records and memorabilia related to school organizations and activities.
III. OBJECTIVES
- To provide all users with carefully selected books and other library materials to meet their needs:
Informational – to serve the community as an information center by providing the right materials for the answering of specific
questions;
Educational – to serve reliable materials to help meet the needs of users in their pursuit of formal and informal education;
Recreational – to encourage reading, viewing, and listening for leisure and cultural enrichment.
- To develop collections with adequate resources in all subject areas.
- To promote the collections to the community all available in all formats.
- To maintaining the collections through appropriate conservation and preservation methods.
Selection
Acquisitions
The process of securing materials for the library collection, whether by purchase, as gifts (Evans, 2000)
Primary concerned with the ordering, purchasing and claiming of materials for the library.
Periodicals
Are publication that come out in patron on a continuing basis such as magazines, journals, and newspapers. They are important
source of information for patrons and are often the most current source of information on a topic.
Gifts
Materials given to the library from various local and foreign sources – individuals, institutions, foundations, friends of the library,
and alumni
Selection and acceptance criteria should be the same as those criteria for purchased materials.
Weeding
V. LIBRARY COMMITTEE
Chair: Fr. Edwin V. Varuelo, Director
V-Chair: Sr. Emma D. Desor, OSM, Principal
Finance Head: Sr. Merci, School Treasurer
Secretary: Bridgette Tubigan, Library Associate
Members:
Subject Areas: Students:
ENGLISH: Mrs. Mary Grace D. Peña SCO President: Ms. Rose Ann
FILIPINO: Mr. Marc C. Taño PCO President: Ms. Dianne
MATHEMATICS: Mr. Edison M. Danila
SCIENCE: Mr. Alfredo C. Tizon Jr.
ARALING PANLIPUNAN: Mrs. Arjean Temple
MAPEH: Mr. Jeffrey Pacia
CL/ESP: Mr. Matthew Cortez
T.L.E.: Mr. Justine Maralit
COMPUTER: Mr. Jeromy C. Tubigan
VI. SELECTION COMMITTEE
Collection development is a collaborative process involving library, teaching and research staff. Faculty is expected to work with the
librarian to recommend appropriate library materials and participate in the selection and evaluation of materials for the library.
Librarian is responsible for monitoring the strengths and weaknesses of the collection supporting academic programs. Final decisions on
the purchase of resources rest with the principal/director of the school.
IX. EVALUATION
Measuring Instruments
Gathering of suggestions/recommendations from teachers and students.
Statistical records on most borrowed materials.
Annual survey on the queries of library users.
X. GRACE
The Learning Resource staff draws their inspiration from Jesus Christ, the Master, the Divine Teacher. He is the Truth and with this,
they aspire that in their service to the members of the community of St. John Parochial School, they become instruments in gaining the
truths of every field of learning. May the grace of Christ, the way, the truth and the life be upon them in their humble service of
carrying out the Learning Resource Center.
CRITERIA
Collection Development Objectives
The primary purpose of the public library is to purchase, organize, and make readily accessible print and nonprint information sources to stimulate interest and
provide information to all eligible library users--regardless of age, sex, race, creed, or social, economic, and educational level.
1. Informational - to serve the community as an information center by providing authoritative materials for the answering of specific questions;
2. Educational - to provide reliable materials to help meet the needs of patrons in their pursuit of formal and informal education;
3. Recreational - to encourage reading, viewing, and listening for leisure and cultural enrichment.
1. The Libraries of the University of Connecticut The libraries of the University of Connecticut develop, maintain, and make discoverable robust and unique
collections that support the research and learning needs of the UConn community and beyond. The University Library serves all of the undergraduate and
graduate programs on the main campus, the four regional campuses, and the UConn Health campus. While the UConn Law Library is administratively separate
from the University Library, the University Library and the Law Library maintain a strong affiliation, particularly in the areas of collection development and access.
With 3.9 million print volumes and well over 110,000 electronic and print journals, the libraries of the University of Connecticut form the most comprehensive public
research collection in the state.
The University Library maintains nine physical locations: four on the Storrs campus, one at each of the four regional campuses, and one at the UConn Health
campus. The Homer Babbidge Library, the flagship location of the University Library, is in the center of the Storrs campus and serves both undergraduate and
graduate programs. The Storrs campus is also home to the Music & Dramatic Arts Library in the Fine Arts complex, the Pharmacy Library in the Pharmacy/Biology
building, and the University Archives & Special Collections at the Thomas J. Dodd Research Center. Each of the University’s four regional campuses — Avery
Point, Hartford, Stamford, and Waterbury — maintains a library dedicated to serving the programs at those sites. Regional campus libraries hold undergraduate-
focused core collections as well as specialized research collections tailored to the needs of graduate programs: Marine Biology at Avery Point; Business, Public
Policy, Education, and Social Work at Hartford; Business at Stamford; and Education, Nursing, and Engineering at Waterbury. The Storrs and regional campus
locations of the he University Library shares a single catalog and each of these libraries serve as a gateway to the collection as a whole. The UConn Health
location of the University Library maintains a separate catalog reflecting the specialized needs of the UConn Health community.
This document applies specifically to the Storrs and regional locations of the University Library (heretofore referred to as “the Library”) and outlines the principles
and guidelines used to develop the collections at these locations.
2. Scope of the Collection The Library develops and maintains collections that inspire discovery and the creation of new knowledge by providing resources that
support and enhance research and scholarship, undergraduate and graduate education, and emerging areas of interdisciplinary interest at the University of
Connecticut. The depth of collection development varies by discipline and is driven by the scholarship and teaching priorities of University’s academic programs.
The Library recognizes that free access to ideas and freedom of expression are fundamental to research and education in a democratic society. The Library is
committed to providing a balanced collection representing a diversity of perspectives. The collection will not exclude any materials on the basis of their creators’
and/or publishers’ race, color, ethnicity, religious creed, age, gender identity, sexual orientation, or physical or mental abilities.
3. Access versus Ownership The Library is responsible for acquiring, curating, and preserving enduring research collections and ensuring their availability for
current and future scholarship. Decisions about which materials to purchase for permanent retention are balanced against the need to provide access to a broad
array of information resources with immediate scholarly and research value. Research strengths, academic priorities, and the information needs of students inform
decisions about when to collect for permanent retention, when to lease or borrow materials, and when to rely on openly available repositories.
4. Resource Sharing and Cooperative Collection Development The Library’s collection is developed to meet the needs of the UConn community while also
functioning as a node in networks of collective collections developed by libraries partnering at regional, national, and international levels. To this end, the Library
participates in resource sharing collaborations that expand access to collections by mutual lending agreements. Among these collaborations is the Eastern
Academic Scholars Trust (EAST), a print retention partnership of over 50 college and university libraries in the region. The mission of EAST is to ensure that
faculty and students in the northeast United States have access to the collective scholarly record of print monographs, journals, and serials in the participating
libraries and that this record is preserved.
5. Licensing Online Resources The libraries of the University of Connecticut negotiate licenses as “One UConn,” including the Storrs campus libraries, regional
campus libraries, the Health library, and the Law library. When negotiating license agreements for online resources, the libraries refrain from purchasing resources
where use restrictions would seriously impede research or intellectual freedom, or be impossible to enforce. The libraries strive to ensure access is granted to the
fullest extent possible and that the UConn Board of Trustees’ approval, signature authority, and contract requirements are all met.
Additionally, the libraries negotiate licenses to be in compliance with the State of Connecticut’s contract requirements. Resources with licenses that do not include
the State of Connecticut’s required contract provisions cannot be acquired.
6. Collections Budget The Library’s collection allocations are used to acquire ownership of or access to monographs, media, journals, and databases; support
interlibrary borrowing and lending; enable the discovery of print and online materials worldwide; steward the University’s scholarly output; and secure participation
in collaborative repositories that safeguard the long term preservation of both print and digital resources. The Library also collaborates with schools and
departments to co-finance specialized resources that benefit our research community.
7. Responsibility for Collection Development The Library’s Collections Steering Committee has administrative oversight for the collections. It sets collection
development policies, makes broad collection budget allocations, and regularly reviews these allocations for strategic adjustment. Selection/retention decisions for
high-cost resources also fall within the purview of the Collections Steering Committee.
The Library’s Research Services unit coordinates the assessment and development of collections and discovery tools of cross-disciplinary nature, while individual
subject librarians have responsibility for assessing and developing collections and information sources relating to their assigned academic disciplines. Fund
allocations are divided among academic disciplines based on the size of the department, nature of material needed, record of expenditures in relation to previous
years, and new initiatives.
8. General Criteria for Collection Development The Library works with users and consortia to determine which resources should be acquired or retained and
employ the following general criteria when evaluating resources to be added to the general collections:
1. Relevance to education and research programs: Applicability to faculty and graduate students’ research interests, current curricular needs, and
research trends in academic disciplines.
2. Scope and depth of the existing collection: Breadth and historic retention of the Library’s collection in the subject area.
3. Quality: Level of scholarship and creativity; long term relevance of content and format; reputation of the author, publisher, contributors, and editorial board;
and availability and importance of illustrations and bibliographies.
4. Currency and timeliness: Rapidity with which new information significantly advances or supersedes earlier scholarship in the subject area.
5. Discoverability, usability, and accessibility: Ability of users to locate materials in scholarly databases and free search engines, intuitiveness of the
interface design, and accessibility of online materials for users with disabilities.
6. Cost: Expense of acquiring, processing, cataloging, shelving, and preserving materials, both commercially sold and free.
7. Language and country of origin: Optimal language and perspective for specific programmatic research and education needs.
8. Contribution to open scholarly communication: The product positively impacts open access to research and scholarship; the information is or will soon
become readily accessible to the world community.
9. Material Type and Format The Library collects materials in a variety of standard formats, selecting the format best suited for the content at hand and the funding
available. Electronic-preferred materials include newspapers, journals, indexes and abstracts, reference texts, government documents, and items in the public
domain. When selecting e-resources, the Library favors those that allow unlimited simultaneous use, are DRM-free, accessible to all members of the UConn
community, functionally reliable and user-friendly. As a general rule, the Library does not acquire the following:
o Textbooks: The Library does not purchase resources that have been published as textbooks.
o Course Reserve Materials: The Library does not purchase or acquire materials for course reserves. Instructors are encouraged to draw course materials
from the Library’s physical or online collections or from the many open education resources now readily available. While the Library does not purchase or
acquire materials that have been published as textbooks or other curricular materials to meet the needs of a particular course, instructors may supply such
materials to the course reserve program from their own collections.
o Outdated Formats: The Library does not acquire, either by purchase or gift, materials in formats requiring specialized equipment, facilities, or utilizing
playing devices no longer manufactured or serviced.
o Streaming Media Available from Mass Market Online Retailers: The Library does not purchase or acquire streaming media content available to
individuals via mass market online retailers that provide reliable and affordable access.
o Multiple Copies and Replacements: The Library does not purchase multiple copies of items for a single location, except for instances in which the item is
in very high demand. Titles in the collection reported missing are replaced as promptly as possible if needed for teaching or research. Replacements for
other lost or damaged materials will be considered on the basis of past use, currency of information, relevance to collecting goals, consortial retention
commitments, and cost.
10. Donated Materials The Library accepts donated materials that enhance our collections by supporting identified research and teaching needs. The following
criteria are used to evaluate donated materials: scope of the collection, physical condition, and duplication. Gift materials that are not added to the collection are
donated to other libraries, sold, or discarded. Unless otherwise agreed upon, the disposition of all donated materials are at the sole discretion of the Library. The
Library cannot provide donors with a monetary appraisal of donated materials.
11. Deselection To maintain a vibrant and relevant collection, the Library employs deselection, also known as collection weeding. Periodic evaluation of the relevance
of resources is an essential element of collection development that ensures the Library’s materials remain useful and accessible. The following criteria are used
when evaluating items for deselection in the general collections:
Collections are acquired by staff primarily by donation, in accordance with Archives & Special Collections’ collection development policy, University of Connecticut
Records Retention policies, and terms outlined in its Deed of Gift documentation. Collection materials that are regularly purchased, either with library monies or
endowment funds, include special collections specimens in fine or near fine condition, reference materials and tools, and, selectively, manuscripts, according to
collecting priorities and as they become available by accredited vendors in the marketplace.
13. Professional School Libraries The Thomas J. Meskill Law Library in Hartford provides comprehensive, current, and relevant print and digital collections that
support the School’s students, faculty, and staff in the advancement of legal scholarship, legal education, and legal research. The Law Library maintains separate
policies and guidelines regarding its collection development program: https://library.law.uconn.edu/about-policies/collection-development-policy.
The Lyman Maynard Stowe Library in Farmington collects materials in support of all three areas of the UConn Health mission academics, clinical care and
research. The library supports the professional degree programs at the School of Medicine and the School of Dental Medicine, as well as the Graduate School,
which awards advanced degrees in biomedical science, dental science, and public health. The Health Library maintains separate policies and guidelines regarding
its collection development program.
COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT POLICY GUIDELINES FOR SCHOOL LIBRARY MEDIA PROGRAMS
The attached policy outline includes those elements which meet the criteria established by the Montana State Library Commission for its Blacktail Mission Statement:
Collection management policies, considered and formally adopted by governing entities, are a prerequisite to maintaining a useful materials collection. Accordingly, the
Commission now requires that any entity applying to the Commission for any grants after July 1, 1986, shall have a written collection management policy in place and on file at the
Montana State Library. The requirements for Collection Management Policy approval have been augmented. The new requirement states that the library's collection management
policy must be reviewed and updated (with the current board chair/legal authority's and director/librarian's signatures) at least once every three yearsand resubmitted in its entirety
to the Montana State Library.
It is important, therefore, that all libraries in Montana develop and adopt a policy in order to be eligible for future funds which are administered by the Commission.
This is an outline for a collection development policy, not a selection policy. A selection policy describes the procedures and policies for adding material to the collection. A
collection development policy includes the elements of a selection policy, but it also describes how the library`s collection serves its users, where the strengths and weaknesses
are, how the collection relates to those in other local libraries, and what the goals are for the development of the collection.
The policy should be written for the library staff, the library board, the governing organization, and the patrons of the library. It should both guide the collection development
activities and explain those activities and their results to others.
The length of such a policy varies with the complexity of the collection and the complexity of the community of users the collection serves. Each category in the outline is important
and should be addressed, at least to the extent appropriate for your library. Your statements within each category may vary from one sentence to several paragraphs. Unlike most
policies, the collection development policy should err on the side of specifics rather than generalities. The questions and statements within each section of the outline are for your
guidance in considering your library`s situation and in writing the policy.
You may want to start with brief statements, especially if this is your first attempt at writing a collection development policy. The process of examining the current collection and
planning for its development is more important than the actual document. Also, a collection development policy should not be static. It should be frequently reviewed and changed
to reflect changes in the library's goals and in the collection itself.
School districts may want to consider a collection development policy for the district that mentions all of the individual school libraries collections. If district wide collection decisions
are made then a district wide policy would be appropriate.
As you work on your collection management policy, if you need further input or have questions, please call the Montana State Library, Statewide Library Resources, at 406-444-
5349.
A. INTRODUCTION
1. Mission Statement: What is the library's reason for existence? What is the library's role in the community? The mission of the governing organization or parent institution
may also be included.
2. Purpose of the Policy: How will the policy be used for library management, planning, and accountability to the governing organization and library users?
3. Community and User Groups Defined: Briefly describe the community served (town, county, school, business, etc.) in terms of size, population, location, economic base,
etc. Describe the primary, secondary and occasional users of the library in terms of ages, education levels, occupations, numbers, frequency of use, reasons for use, etc.
4. Patron Needs and Services/Programs Defined: What educational, recreational, and/or research needs must be met? Consider the needs of children, students, senior
citizens, handicapped, business people, and other segments of the population. What services and/or programs does the library offer to meet these needs? (Examples:
children's programs, homebound service, literacy tutoring, online database searching, telefax delivery of interlibrary loan materials, etc.) What needs are not being met?
5. Brief General Statement Describing the Collection: In general, how would you describe the library's collection? What is the size (in volumes or titles)? By how much does it
grow each year? What reading or information levels (preschool, school levels, adult, technical/professional) are collected?
6. Cooperative Collection Development & Interlibrary Loan: How does use of interlibrary loan affect collection decisions? What cooperative agreements, if any, are in effect?
Do you have deposit collection arrangements with other libraries, classroom teachers, the jail, nursing homes, etc.? Are the holdings of other libraries in WLN or within the
community considered before a title is purchased? Under what circumstances?
1. Chronological Coverage: This refers primarily to the publication dates of the titles in the collection. Do you have mostly current information? Are older publications kept for
historical or research purposes? Distinguish between older material intentionally retained and material that needs to be withdrawn.
2. Formats: Describe which formats of information the library collects: books, periodicals, newspapers, sound recordings, videotapes, films, slides, software, microfilm, CD-
ROM, online databases, etc. Are paperbacks, textbooks, large print or microforms purchased or collected? Under what circumstances and to what extent? Is there a need
to collect in a format you don't yet have?
3. Multiple Copies: Does the library normally purchase multiple copies of books or other items? How is the determination made to purchase or place in the collection
duplicates?
4. Languages: Is material collected in languages other than English? (Examples: "Maintain collection of adult and juvenile Spanish fiction." "Collect classic French and
German literature to support undergraduate courses.")
5. Funding Considerations: How are funds for materials obtained and allocated? Are funds obtained from any special sources, such as a trust fund, donation fund, friends
group, grants? Are funding formulas tied to enrollment?
6. Collection Responsibilities and Selection Procedures: Who selects materials? What general processes or procedures are involved? What criteria are used for selection?
The information from an existing selection policy could be reviewed and added here.
7. Collection Maintenance: Why, when and by what criteria do you withdraw or weed items? (Examples of weeding guidelines: outdated information; poor physical condition;
unneeded duplicates; subject not within scope of collection development policy.) Policies concerning rebinding, repair and replacements should be addressed here.
8. Complaints and Censorship: Include the full procedure, policy and forms used by the library. The Library Bill of Rights, The Freedom to Read statement, and any other
relevant policies should be appended to the collection policy.
9. Gifts Policy: Do you accept anything offered? What do you add to the collection? How do you dispose of unwanted gifts? Do you accept gifts with "strings" or restrictions
attached? Do you accept monetary gifts, bequests? Who makes the decisions about gifts? Be sure to mention that you do not appraise materials and therefore will give
receipts only for the number of items, not for their value.
1. Subjects: The detail of this section will depend on the size and needs of the library. Three common approaches are described below. Choose or adapt the one most
relevant to your library's collection. Be as general or as specific as you need to be to have useful information for development of the collection. a. Broad categories, e.g.
History, Science & Technology, Social Sciences, Literature, General Reference, Religion, etc., or curriculum areas. b. Broad classification number categories:
Dewey: 000's, 100's, 200's, 300's...
Library of Congress: A's, B's, C's...
c. Specific classification number categories, for example:
Dewey
900-909 History
910, 914-919 Travel
910-912, 914-919 Geography
913 Archaeology
2.
L.C.
E51-99 Indians of North America
E101-135 Discovery & exploration of America
E186-199 Colonial history
E201-298 Revolution
3. Present Collection Levels: Within each of the subject categories established in section #1, give a brief description of your current collection in that subject. Be sure to
include all formats: books, periodicals, audiovisual, government publications, etc. in your description and assessment of each subject area. At the minimum, give some
indication of the strengths and weaknesses of your collection in each subject area. (Examples: "The library does not collect in this area." "Have current reference sources,
10-15 circulating books, but all are more than 25 years old.")
o You may combine brief descriptions with standard collection level descriptions, such as the following:
o Out of scope: means the library does not collect in this subject.
o Minimal level: have a few good items.
o Basic level: have an up-to-date collection that will introduce readers to the subject and indicate the varieties of information available elsewhere.
o Study level: have a collection adequate to support undergraduate instruction & sustained independent study. Includes material at all appropriate reading levels.
o Research level: includes all the major published source material required for dissertation research.
o If your library has used a conspectus methodology to assess the collection, you may choose to use the assessment level codes (0, 1a, 1b, 2a, etc.) in this section. [If you
would like information about the conspectus method of assessment, please contact the State Library.]
4. Future acquisition levels or goals: Again within each subject area in section #1, indicate your needs and goals for that subject. How do you intend to change the collection?
What are your priorities? Within what time frame? If the area needs weeding, or other specific action, that may be a goal in addition to the acquisition goals for new titles.
(Examples: Weed "Science & Technology" collection by mid-1989. Upgrade "Medicine" collection from minimal to basic level by 1991. Work toward study level for "Local
History" collection. Priorities are: Local history, current fiction, and business (adult collection); support for summer reading program (children's collection.)
5. Special collections: Describe any subject areas or format collections which the library maintains as a strong or unique collection. These may be materials that are shelved
separately or that do not circulate. (Examples: rare books on the history of skiing; local history collection; slide collection; vertical file collection.) [Note: Special collections
require extra care and investments of time and money to properly maintain and develop. Consider carefully before starting a special collection. If you have one already,
consider if it truly fits with the library's mission and collection goals. It may be more appropriate to integrate it into the general collection or to donate it to another library.]
6. Other considerations: Information on languages, formats and chronological coverage may be noted within each appropriate subject area, if the general statements in
section B above are not sufficient for your library or if a particular subject segment is an exception. If a collection assessment has been done, information about the
methods used, the personnel involved and the dates and depth of the process should be noted.
How, when and by whom will the policy be reviewed and updated? Try to be specific. (Examples: "Every June by the librarian and trustees." "Every two years, beginning in 1990,
by the library-faculty committee.") [NOTE: The requirements for Collection Management Policy approval have been augmented. The new requirement states that the library's
collection management policy must be reviewed and updated (with the current board chair/legal authority's and director/librarian's signatures) at least once every three years and
resubmitted in its entirety to the Montana State Library.]
The last item on the policy should be the official record of action. This should include dates and signatures of the significant parties concerned. For example:
___________________________________________________
Librarian Date
___________________________________________________
Administrator Date
___________________________________________________
Chair, Board of Education Date
or whatever would constitute official action for a policy for your library. The action to adopt the policy should be recorded in the minutes of an official meeting.
Collection Development Policy
It is said that the library is a trinity of books, users and staff. Books are of various types and formats generally known as collection. Books are being published in
increasing number every year. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) monitors both the number and type of books
published per country per year. In 2005, the United Kingdom published 206,000 books, where as in the same year United States published 172,000 books.
Advances in information communication technology and the emergence of electronic resources have added a new dimension of digital books and other media to
ever increasing number of books worldwide. Left to themselves, librarians would like to acquire as many books as they can while the users would like to have all
the books of their interest in the library with which they are associated. Unfortunately, library budgets are very much limited regardless of the type of library -
academic, public, or special library. At the same time other needs such as open access computers, multi media services etc have to be met with. The best way of
facing these problems appears to be to have a well written collection development policy.
Whitehead (1989) took a practical look at writing the policy and explains how to start the process, what to write first, what to put into it, how to get one quick, what
to call it, and how long it should be.http://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/swin:281
Dartmouth College Library presents useful guidelines for writing collection development policies. http://www.dartmouth.edu/~cmdc/bibapp/cdpguide.html
Conclusion
However, Snow (1996) is of the opinion that written collection development policies in the academic library are unnecessary as written policy represents a
significant investment in its creation and maintenance. One may not agree with this opinion. With the diminishing budgets and ever increasing prices of books and
non-book material, there is every need for a sound collection development policy with periodic revisions.
Collection Development Policy
Rationale
The function of Parkes High School Library is primarily to support the learning needs of
students and the teaching requirements of staff. To do so, it must provide information to
support all curriculum areas taught at the school whilst at the same time helping students
and teachers to use ever changing, complex technological tools to access the information
effectively.
As well, the library has an important role in supporting the recreational needs of students
The library collection will support the school’s motto Dum Vivo Disco - ‘While I Live I
Manages and organises complex and changing information sources for easy
1. General Guidelines
The Collection Development Policy is a “blueprint” (Jackson 2007) for the future of
Parkes High School Library identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the collection in
funding applications (Kennedy 2005, p16). In turn, it provides accountability for funds
spent. The policy also sets out selection guidelines, ensuring the public is aware of how
material is selected and providing objective justification for the collection. It should also
be seen as a tool not only to inform the community, but to encourage their support of the
Another purpose of this policy is to rejuvenate the library at Parkes High School (PHS)as
a centre for information and learning by attracting more users to the library and making it
the focal point of the school, for staff, students, parents and other community members.
students’ (Baumbach & Miller 2006, p3), whatever their needs, interests and abilities.
This policy is a “living document” (Arizona State Library 2003, Overview, para 2), and
will be modified every 12 months, with stakeholder input, to reflect changing needs.
collaborating with teachers for the selection and effective use of resources;
promoting collaboration with the Parkes Shire Library and other libraries.
Collection Goals
The collection aims to address the following user needs identified at PHS:
To meet these needs, goals will be organised around them rather than by subject areas as
resources for School Certificate and HSC students across all subject areas. Items
requirements. These materials will include study guides; critical works on set
authors for English; primary source material for Ancient History; items for
Chinese and American history; up-to-date Science and Agriculture texts; and
links on the library webpage. The availability of the ‘Ask a Librarian’ service will
Information Literacy Skills and Research. To aid the improvement of IL skills, the
regularly. New resources will be organised collectively for either subject areas or
collaboratively with the classroom teacher, always including tips for information
Literacy including Peer Tutoring and programs for boys. In collaboration with the
Support Teacher Learning Assistants (STLAs) who run peer tutoring, resources
significant portion of reluctant readers, (Pritchard n.d.) will also be targeted with
graphic novels, magazines which reflect their interests (commonly, dirt bikes, pig
shooting etc!) and the online test for the Learner Driver’s License.
Wiradjuri Language. The recent initiative of Wiradjuri language classes and the
resources. This will not only enhance the teaching of skills but engender
initiatives, cement the learning of Wiradjuri as part of the curriculum, and attract
how physical spaces in the library are arranged and signposted to encourage users
and make resources easy to access, with a view to changing the layout of the
genre labels could be attached to spines of books to attract readers. Links for
Material will be chosen for inclusion in the library only if it reflects the objectives of the
library in:
The “most appropriate” rather than “the best” (Hughes-Hassell & Mancall) resources will
be purchased, as budget limitations and specific learning needs mean the library cannot
afford to buy materials “just in case”, but there is a need to get them “just in time” (ibid).
Selection will be made according to the needs of users, and especially in the case of
online resources, will be collated by the TL for ease of use and to ensure that there is
school.
3. Appearance and quality of format. Items should attract users, with images,
graphics etc which support the text, and be durable and of good quality.
4. The cost of an item should be considered in terms of value for money,
5. Items selected should help students gain “social and cultural awareness and
experiences and opinions” (Trinity) and the points of view and contributions
will evaluate resources to ensure they are current and accurate, and collate
8. “Scope of the work, adequacy of coverage and level of detail” (CMIS). Is the
scope too narrow or too wide for intended users? (PHS CDP)
Final responsibility for the selection of materials for this collection rests with the Teacher
Librarian. However, consultation with all stakeholders, including students, staff and
parents, will also influence the collection, and it is hoped that community members will
It is envisaged that a community panel (www.lib.az.us...) will be set up within the next 12
months to discuss selection possibilities. The panel will meet once per term and involve a
10
perhaps someone from PSL and possibly ‘guest appearances’ by a representative from the
In keeping with the aim of attracting more users, meetings of the panel will play a
Selection Aids
Various methods of selection will be used, including the community selection panel. As
Scan and newspapers will be accessed. Australian Standing Orders will continue to
Suggestions from students, staff and parents will always be considered, and a suggestion
slip will be available at the library desk and in the school newsletter, to be filled in and
Discussion with other librarians, including listservs will also inform purchasing
decisions.
Gifts and donated items will be gratefully accepted under the following conditions:
Items will be subject to the selection criteria and accepted or rejected accordingly;
11
Format
The library will collect information in a wide range of formats including:
Books, inc
novels
graphic novels
picture books
encyclopedias
dictionaries
thesauruses
other reference
books
Journals
Magazines
Newspapers
Poetry
Song lyrics
Plays
Posters
Examples of
student work
NON-PRINT
Audio CDs
cassettes, inc
documentaries
films
TV programs
CD-ROMS
Multimedia
Audio books
Radio broadcasts
Music
DIGITAL
Online reference
sources, eg
encyclopedias
dictionaries
WebPages
Computer
software
CD-ROMS
Games
Pathfinders
12
Languages
Languages taught in LOTE (French, German) and the Wiradjuri language classes will be
three-fold – it will increase value for money of expensive resources, encourage parent
participation in their child’s education, and promote the library. The scheme will be
Duplicate Copies
Because of budget limitations duplicate copies of library materials will not be purchased
unless:
by the teacher;
They are very popular fiction titles, like the John Marsden, Harry Potter or
Twilight series’;
The resources held by the PSL should also be considered when ordering duplicate copies.
Generally, the acquisition of new titles will take priority over old items.
13
The cataloguing of class sets has not traditionally been a PHS library function, however
this may change as certain faculties attempt to improve the return rate of text books
Collection Evaluation
Lost Items
The issue of lost items needs to balance the ability of users to pay fines/be subject to
other penalties with the high cost of replacing lost items/limited budget. In terms of
promoting the library, a penalty reinforces the value of resources. The following policy
will be adopted:
staff and students will both be subjected to penalties (currently, the cost of
at the end of each term the TL with the help of students/staff will visit staffrooms
at the quarterly community panel meeting, the TL will publish a tally of overdue
at the end of each term students will be sent an overdue notice with the cost of the
overdue item.
14
It is hoped that these measure will encourage the return of or payment for overdue/lost
item1
Weeding
of collection evaluation
collection aided by tools such as collection mapping, surveys and circulation reports
should be the basis of decisions to remove items from the collection. Weeding is
important to free up space and keep shelves looking attractive to encourage use; and,
most importantly, to ensure users have access to the most relevant and up-to-date
information – “out of date information is never better than no information” (Baumbach &
Miller 2006, p6). Weeding is also a great opportunity to enlist the support of teachers
Lack of use. An item will be discarded if it has not been used in 5 years.
However, care should be taken to consult with teachers especially to prevent the
inaccurate, biased or stereotyped (although for these reasons they may be useful
About 60% of lost books are currently paid for by students. Staff, however, do not pay although it is part
2
Currently conducted annually during stock take.
15
website.
Challenged materials
If an objection is made to an item in the collection, the complainant will be asked to fill
out a “Request for consideration of a book” form, (Appendix B). A book will not be
withdrawn from the collection on the basis of isolated complaints, but overwhelming
objections will be referred to the community panel, and then to the Principal for a final
decision. The attention of complainants will be drawn to the ALIA Statement of Free
16
1. INTRODUCTION
Purpose
The Ottenheimer Library selects materials primarily for the instructional and research activities of the students, faculty, and staff at
the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. The library’s Collection Management Guidelines: Overview states the overarching principles
that the library follows in the selection and acquisition of library materials. The purpose of these guidelines is to provide consistency
among the persons responsible for collection management and to communicate library policy to the faculty, staff, students, and the
community. Guidelines for subject areas are at Collection Management Guidelines: Subjects.
Library Mission
Based upon its responsibility to the university as stated in the library mission statement: “Ottenheimer Library collects, organizes,
and provides access to information resources and library services that enrich and support the university’s research and teaching
mission, foster intellectual development, and promote academic excellence.” The library fulfills its mission by building a rich resource
of research materials, providing access to collections and services, maintaining a dialogue with the scholarly community, encouraging
public engagement, and forming external alliances.
Audience
The main audience for these guidelines is the university community of faculty, staff, students, and administrators. Other users and
potential resource sharing partners may also find the guidelines useful.
Return to Table of Contents
Selection Responsibility
Final responsibility for the development and maintenance of the library’s collection rests with the dean. The director of technical
services and technology oversees the collection management program. The collection management librarian, library selectors, and
faculty liaisons actively participate in the selection of materials for the collection.
Faculty Liaisons
Faculty liaisons are teaching faculty chosen by their departments to solicit requests for library materials from their colleagues to
support teaching and research. The liaisons facilitate communication between the university’s academic units and the library’s
collection management department.
Library Selectors
Library selectors participate in the selection and evaluation of materials for the library. Selectors work within the constraints of
the library’s budget and follow the principles written in: Collection Management Guidelines: Overview.
Return to Table of Contents
3. FUNDING AND BUDGET ALLOCATION
Funds to purchase library resources originate primarily from state appropriations and from tuition revenue. Supplemental funds come from
gifts, grants, and other sources which are generally limited and ordinarily have restrictions on their use. The director for technical services and
technology administers the materials budget with input from other library administrators, the head of acquisitions, and the collection
development librarian. The budget is typically divided between one-time and ongoing expenditures. Ongoing publications (journals, databases)
receive the initial allocation. Remaining funds are allocated for one-time expenditures (books, DVDs, CDs). Based on institutional priorities the
library allocates its materials budget by subject using a series of fund codes to track expenditures. The materials budget supports the purchase
of all formats designated in section 5 of the Collection Management Guidelines: Overview and provides funding for:
Access charges for electronic resources.
Membership in consortia.
Access to and preservation of purchased and donated library resources.
5. SELECTION GUIDELINES
Support of the university’s teaching and research programs is the library’s highest priority in selecting materials for its collections. The library
acquires and/or licenses resources produced in all formats, but reserves the right to reject purchasing in a format considered obsolete,
outdated, or unproven. Generally, the library does not purchase multiple copies of any title. All purchases depend on the availability of
funds.Types of Materials Collected
Books
The library acquires books in print or in electronic format.
Electronic Resources
E-resources acquired and/or licensed include, but are not limited to, electronic journals, online databases, electronic reference
materials, electronic books, and streaming media collections. Due to the unique nature of e-resources, the library uses special criteria
for selection. See Collection Management Guidelines: Electronic Resources for these criteria.
Journals and Newspapers
The preferred format for journals and newspapers is electronic. The library rarely acquires new subscriptions to these materials in
print.
Media
The library acquires sound and visual recordings on digital video disc (DVD) compact disc (CD), and streaming audio.
Microforms
The library acquires microform materials selectively.
Musical Scores
Single copies of musical scores are acquired as needed in support of the curriculum and upon specific request of an instructor.
Maps
The library purchases maps, atlases, globes, and charts selectively. The government documents collection regularly receives maps
from the U.S. Government Printing Office as part of the depository program.
Return to Table of Contents
9. INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM
The library community has adopted various documents defining aspects of intellectual freedom. The library supports the American Library
Association’s Bill Of Rights, Freedom To Read Statement, and the American Film and Video Association’s Freedom to View Statement. The
Library also endorses the Intellectual Freedom Principles for Academic Libraries as approved by the Association of College and Research
Libraries (ACRL) Board of Directors. Any individual or group questioning the appropriateness of materials within the collection will be referred to
the director of technical services and technology.
10.COPYRIGHT
The library adheres to provisions of the United States Copyright Law and related guidelines.
11.GLOSSARY
Acquisitions. Process of ordering and receiving library resources.
Amigos. Consortium of libraries primarily in the Southwestern United States that provide opportunities for networking, collaboration, and cost
savings through group purchasing for products and services.
ARKlink. Consortium of Arkansas college and university libraries cooperating to purchase and deliver services and collections to researchers in
the state.
Collection Management. Process of selecting library resources and evaluating materials for cancellation, withdrawal, and preservation.
EPSCoR. Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research. National Science Foundation program designed to strengthen research and
education in science and engineering throughout the United States.
GWLA. Greater Western Library Alliance. Regional consortium of libraries in the Midwest, South, and Central United States that provide
opportunities for networking, collaboration, and cost savings through group purchasing for products and services.
Library of Congress Classification system. A system developed by the Library of Congress to organize and arrange library resources on the
shelves.
LYRASIS. Membership organization of libraries in the Mid-Atlantic, Northeast, Southeast, and Western regions of the U.S that provide
opportunities for networking, collaboration, and cost savings through group purchasing for products and services.
Microforms. Reduced images of print materials produced on reels (microfilm) or flat sheets (microfiche).
OCLC. International organization providing library services (cataloging, interlibrary loan) and access to online databases.
Weeding. Process of selecting items for withdrawal from the collection.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The Collection Development Policy Revision Committee thanks the FAU Libraries for granting permission to use their policy as a
model. http://www.library.fau.edu/policies/cd_fau.htm#collection.
The Collection Development Policy for Print & AV materials is a set of guidelines used by the Library staff to select print and audio visual materials. This is to help fulfill an
important goal of the Library, which is to develop and maintain a collection that matches the curriculum and research profiles of all academic disciplines covered by the
entire university community. The Policy will also help users understand better the reasons behind the Library decision on selection and purchasing of library materials.
Subject librarians are responsible for the selection of print and AV materials in the subject areas that they are assigned to. Their selection is based on individual subject
profiles which lists the collection intensity level for each topical area identified by the Library of Congress Classification number. The subject profiles are drafted by subject
librarians and approved by the respective faculty staff. The subject profiles also form the basis on which approval plans with vendors are initiated. The approval plans
enable vendors to send new books to the Library which meet the requirements in the subject profiles automatically, thus speeding up the procurement process. After
selection, the Acquisitions Division will follow up with the procurement of the materials.
What is selection.
Selection and its related activity; appraisal, are essential elements in collections management. Selection has an importance at all levels of
collection from the lending or access situations, either by direct physical means or provision in data banks for electronic transmission, through to
the national library and the archive. Selection is arguably the most important and at the same time the most difficult of all the activities of the
archivist, curator or librarian, especially those dealing with audiovisual materials and imposes a discipline on the collector almost from the
beginning. The very consideration of what to collect or how wide a range of material one includes in a collection is one of the first principles of
selection.
Appraisal.
This has been mentioned already and although it is closely allied to selection it may occur on a different timescale and has a different purpose. It
is the intellectual decision making which should precede selection: it is the activity which attempts to determine the value and disposition of
records based on their administrative and legal use; their evidential, informational or research value; their arrangement and their relationship to
other records. Appraisal is also aimed at determining the intrinsic value of the material, that is records which have qualities and characteristics
which make records in their intrinsic form the only acceptable one for preservation. eg. The presentation of a musical work as a recording or a
series of pictures produced as a motion picture has an intrinsic value in the form presented: a piece of textual information has its own value,
regardless of the form. It is argued that this concept adds another dimension to the selection and appraisal of audiovisual materials, and it is often
a difficult decision to make for technical reasons. The form (not the format) of presentation acquires a greater significance for audiovisual
materials.
In theory appraisal should precede acquisition, in practice it seldom does with audiovisual documents. Appraisal is usually applied to whole
collections or bodies of material; the audiovisual archivist seldom has this amount of material to choose from, and has to deal in what has
managed to survive until the point in time he is able to collect or preserve the material. Selection in audiovisual collections is more akin to
'reappraisal' to rationalise the collection.
Why Select?
Selection is an inevitable process and there are several powerful arguments for its application. The first could be said to be that we cannot collect
and conserve everything, it is a physical impossibility, another is that a collection has to appear as a coherent and cohesive body of material useful
for a particular purpose, usually the collection involved, another is that if we do not select with reasonable care then what is the point of spending
resources of time and money documenting, storing and preserving material which is not of archival value?
Selection has been made even more imperative as a result of the increased ease of recording. As tape recording has become easier and the
equipment less cumbersome more and more recording is made possible by a greater variety of people. No longer is it the sole province of a
technician to record material for preservation purposes.
We cannot keep everything. That is rule number one. A recent World Survey carried out by the Library of Congress produced some startling
figures. Remember that we are talking about audiovisual materials of moving image and recorded sound which have been around for just over a
century. The World Survey indicated that some 93,731,000 items (74,403,500 sound recordings; 10,108,500 reels of film; and 9,219,000 video
recordings) are housed in the 500 archives surveyed, let alone the large collections. When one looks at the commercial output of moving images
and sound recordings the figures rise exponentially. There is also the mass of material produced non-commercially, and by broadcasting, where
far more material is recorded than transmitted and untransmitted material may be potentially valuable for later usage. Specialized subject
collections may also contain recorded material or the archivist may have conducted interviews which have been edited down for public access
purposes, but the unedited material has its own value.
It is a dereliction of our duty as information providers not to select the material for preservation and future use. Not only is there not enough
storage space, there are not enough resources to keep all the material intact. Additionally audiovisual materials are very slow to work with, they
take real time to view, listen to and hopefully appreciate. Selection principles try to produce a collection which is easily accessible. Too much
information can be as difficult to handle as too little - it is equally difficult to access and discover the material which would be most useful. The
idea that you can, with the aid of modern technology, store everything easily on data banks or those convenient little cassettes appeals to the
research worker, but they forget the amount of time needed to access audiovisual materials even with sophisticated retrieval techniques, and also
the amount of time and effort required to enter the information on to the database in a retrievable or accessible form.
There are three stages in the collection and management of materials - any materials - where selection is necessary.
1. Before acquisition, or on acquisition of a new collection or item, to determine whether this item will add to the value of the collection
2. After acquisition to rationalise the collection and
3. To determine priorities for preservation and conservation of the collection whether it is recently acquired or long received.
Each of these stages has its own requirements, rules and criteria.
Who Selects
It is necessary to establish who will select the material and then formulate the criteria for selection. Some archives have selection staff who
concentrate on the areas of acquisition and selection, others use a system of selection committees. But selection by consultation and committee is
not necessarily a good thing. It is fraught with difficulty when sectional interests appear and squabbles break out between people from different
disciplines. A short piece paraphrased from a book on Archive Administration written in 1922 by Hilary Jenkinson serves to point out the
dilemma and;
"The archivist is concerned to keep materials intact for the future use of students working upon subjects which neither he nor any one else has
contemplated. The archivist's work is that of conservation and his interest in his archives as archives, not as documents valuable for proving this
or that thesis. How then is he to make judgements and choices on matters which may not be his personal concern. If the archivist cannot be of use,
can we not appeal to the historian - he may seem the obvious person to undertake such a task. As soon, however, as the historian's claims in this
connection are investigated it becomes clear that the choice of him as arbiter of the fate of archives is at least as open to criticism as that of the
archivist. Must he not be regarded, where his own subject is concerned, as a person particularly liable to prejudice? Surely there will always
remain the suspicion that in deciding upon a policy of archive conservation he favoured those archive classes which furthered his own special line
of inquiry. The very fact that a historian is known to have selected for an archive is fatal to its impartiality".
Given the guiding principle that selection is of necessity a major concern of the archivist it is suggested that the people responsible for the
collections are best able to judge what should be included, and all the ramifications of the selection decisions. Specially appointed staff in the
archive can see the wider implications and if thoroughly versed in the aims and objectives of the particular archive are in a good position to select,
but to be effective they must be carefully chosen, and they should have a set of criteria to work with.
Principles
As an essential part of archive and collections management selection has been discussed for many years and the criteria used have been developed
and in some cases published. There is a general, and not surprising, concensus of opinion about the essentials in many of the guidelines. There are
several sources for guidelines which have been given a wider coverage than the collections for which they were developed. These include the
RAMP studies of UNESCO for moving images, sound recordings and photographs, by Kula, Harrison and Leary. Selection in Sound Archives,
edited by Helen Harrison andSound Archive Administration by Alan Ward contain useful material, in Selection in Sound Archives the National
Archives and Record Service of the USA criteria are reprinted, and the criteria used in the National Film and Sound Archive, Australia appear in
the Phonographic Bulletin.
Many of the guidelines and lists of criteria contain similar elements and these can be summarised:
If the first principle of selection is to produce a collection of relevance and manageable proportions within the institution, the purpose of selection
is to ensure a balanced, representative collection of material relevant to the nature of the subject matter of the archive concerned. This means
different archives will have different selection policies according to the intended use of the collection. Selecting material within areas of interest
of the individual archive immediately raises the question of what is in the field of interest and what is outside? There will, almost inevitably, be
grey areas where the material could be considered of use to the archive in conjunction with the rest of the collection.
Is the material relevant to the collection, does it add significant, or useful material of interest to the present and future user of the collection, and if
so can the costs of storage and preservation be justified. How much can the collection cope with? If the material is of doubtful use to a particular
collection should it be referred elsewhere. Should material already in the collection be deselected as a result of the new acquisition?
Quantity. Many audiovisual materials may be collected in greater numbers than others if only because several versions of an event or several
interpretations of an item have to be retained. one would not contemplate keeping only one interpretation of a musical work, the performance has
an influence and an interest. Edited and unedited, cut and uncut versions of many audiovisual works have to be retained as the unedited material
contains far more information than was ever distributed. Unedited material also forms the basis of many future productions. A film may be
available in cut and uncut versions, for example we are increasingly getting the directors' cut for the authentic view of the work, or the producers
cut for commercial release. All these may have their value as records of the work, or as a statement of the social aura at the time of release. How
do you choose and what do you choose? All episodes of a television series may have to be kept - for it is always the episodes discarded which will
be remembered for something special. Serials of course have to be kept in entirety or not at all. News items may have to be kept in several
versions, perhaps in separate collections to reflect different points of view. Newsreels are historical records and should be kept in entirety. The
same has been argued for television newscasts and it has even been argued that complete transmissions from a year should be kept. Television has
a huge output and the selection process is usually much more stringent than in many other collections.
Uniqueness or rarity
Material for archival preservation should be either unique to a collection or not duplicated in several existing collections where there may be a
waste of resources preserving the same thing three or four times over. Is the material offered a rare source of information on its subject. The
audiovisual archivist has to bear in mind that legal deposit has been rare until recently and material may have been dispersed or collected
erratically so that one archive cannot assume that any other is collecting in a particular area or country of origin. In these circumstances it
becomes important for all archives to have selection policies and to discuss their policies with other archives both nationally and internationally
and ensure that valuable material is kept somewhere, but not in each and every archive.
The status of the copies could also be taken into account, are they original recordings or copies where the original is inaccessible for some reason.
Integrity. Selection has always had to be sophisticated in assessing the material for disposal. There have been many fakes or manipulations
involving av materials. This can range from the use of substitutes to illustrate events - the substitution of the Mauritania for the sinking of the
Lusitania, pictures from one conflict used as 'illustrations' of another, bias created by inaccurate juxtapositions of shots and interviews, mis-
identification of people, places and things, wrong locations for films, tidying up of performances where a musical work has literally been stitched
together making the performer sound better than they were. I watch with horror some of the manipulation of images on a computer, just as I watch
with horror the writers of second-rate research papers plagiarising original thought, word and image, cobbling the materials together to
misrepresent and clogging up the access mechanisms. The selector has to be aware of these manipulations and misrepresentations and try to
maintain the integrity of the collection.
Intrinsic value.
This is a difficult principle to apply and it relates to many of the other principles mentioned already. It is the archival term applied to permanently
valuable records which have qualities or characteristics that make the records in their intrinsic form the only acceptable for preservation.
Difficulties will arise with audiovisual materials for technical reasons, but some records may be kept as examples of the artefact or particular
recording material if this can be done safely.
Quality
This is a relative principle; closely related to the unique quality of the material. In theory the best quality or material closest to the original should
be selected, but sometimes when the only available material is of poor quality its unique nature overrides the principle of quality. A closely
related factor is that of technological change which may mean a recording is only available on an 'obsolete' carrier. Archives should not select on
the basis of whether or not they can replay material - this is library selection. An archive must consider other qualities of the material and if it is
essential to the collection, but on an unplayable medium, an archive needs facilities to transfer it to a usable medium. If the material is in poor
condition the selector has to be able to justify the cost of preservation work with the unique or rare content.
Digital vs analogue. This is not the place to go into technical details, I would not presume so far. But it is almost certain for the near future that
material which will be selected for special treatment by the Memory of the World programme will have to remain on its original carriers for a
while yet. It cannot remain so indefinitely, sooner or later the carrier will decay the nitrate film may moulder and worse spontaneously combust,
film or magnetic tape may develop vinegar syndrome, the CDs will develop 'laser rot' or the surface oxidise - a recent article spoke of tell tale
signs on a CD after 5 years, photographic film will deteriorate in density and colour of image. Constant transfers of analogue data will result in a
degradation of the image or sound quality, whereas material transferred to the digital mode should at least retain its information and not degrade.
This does not necessarily mean that digital data is better than analogue per se to my untutored mind, but it is better for the longer integrity of the
information.
Copyright/ownership/obligations
Legal deposit has been a rarity for audiovisual materials until recently and audiovisual collections have other acquisition policies in force. These
may come with certain restrictions imposed by the donor. Some material may in effect be 'unusable' because of copyright or contractual
restrictions. Restrictions imposed on the archive by the donor may involve not permitting copying of the material for preservation purposes, not
allowing access and other strictures such as return of material on demand. If the depositor imposes restrictive conditions then the selector must
decide whether the material is of sufficient value to justify the cost of administering the restrictions. Film archives have some of the most difficult
decisions to make in this regard. Audiovisual collections need to select for acquisition, for preservation and for access, and all of these may be
restricted by contracts, and copyright. The decisions have to be taken before deposit.
Timing.
The timing of selection is also an important principle. It should never be a once-and-for-all decision. Some material need be kept for only short
periods while checks are made on existing material which it may duplicate. Better quality or more complete material may be offered. Other
material can be looked at retrospectively after a period or periods of time. Most archives which practice selection will be found to use this
principle.
This is one of the main principles of selection rather than a criterion. Selection staff should be as objective and free from bias as possible within
realistic parameters. Hindsight is a useful mechanism and it can be achieved by adopting a long term policy of selection. Optimum selection
decisions are best taken after a 'decent' interval.
Related Documentation. With audiovisual documents the documentation which comes with the 'blind' materials is of great importance. Without
some background materials, a shotlist, a script, a descriptive sheet, the material could be unidentifiable. Such related material should also be
retained and maintained as well as matched with the material. If related documentation is not available the research and effort involved in tracing
the material will have to be weighed against the value of the material itself. Related documentation will also have to be stored separately and kept
linked to the material on a database.
The Memory of the World programme is an attempt to save a proportion of the cultural heritage and the documents which form and portray that
heritage. Audiovisual documents, most of which have been produced in the 20th century are an important record of the cultural heritage of this
century, but they are among the most vulnerable to destruction, and/or manipulation. What should we try to save first. In order to decide this
initial steps are being taken in providing inventories of lost and endangered collections as well as work in progress to save the material. The lost
collections will be a sad reminder of the ravages of time, chemistry, natural and man-made disasters; the endangered collections will provide the
core of material to which selection principles and priorities can be applied. The inventory of work in progress will help to avoid duplication of
effort and waste of resources. Information about existing collections in the way of Directories of holdings can supplement these inventories.
When considering the Memory of the World project we are not talking about all selection - we are actually talking about more stringent decisions.
It has to be left to the established institutions and archives to look after their own materials and then perhaps be enlisted to rescue in addition the
endangered collections, for it is only the existing institutions and commercial laboratories who can save such collections. Once the collections are
saved, restored, or whatever has to be done to them a permanent home has to be sought to safeguard the continuing existence of such a collection.
There is little point in using resources to save a collection which then has to go back into a situation where the prognosis for survival is poor.
Already it has been realised that selection will be of paramount importance in the Memory of the World project and the draft report identifies
certain principles of selection for survival.
The project will also concentrate on collections, rather than individual items - they can and should be saved by the relevant institutions. Factors to
be considered in the selection will include:
"The content and its artistic, cultural, literary or scientific value, the national, regional or international significance, the context, the physical
condition, the degree of risk the material exists in (for example, a war zone or disaster area.) and the project's feasibility (whether it can be carried
out in a reasonable period of time). Priority will be given to activities concerning a region, a number of countries or a national project which is of
international importance and to an entire collection rather than just individual items. Special consideration will be given to the problem of
reconstituting the memory of a people in the case of dispersed or displaced holdings. Combinations of these criteria will determine the uniqueness
of the collection or holding and the consequences of its loss for humanity should it become irreparably damaged." 10
The Guelph Public Library will acquire Audio-Visual materials to meet the cultural, instructional, informational, and leisure needs of the community recognizing the
changing interests and variety of tastes and ages.
AV Selection criteria.
Because of the great diversity of materials available, no single set of criteria can be applied to all items. Some items are judged primarily in terms of artistic merit or
documentation of the times, while others are selected to satisfy recreational needs of the community. Titles may be evaluated using one or more of the following criteria:
High interest
Quality of production
Canadian content
Contribution to the balance of treatment of a controversial subject
Strengths and weaknesses of the current collection
Timeliness and accuracy of the information
Budgeting consideration
Space restrictions
Awards and recommendations
Favourable reviews in recognized reviewing journals
Contemporary significance or permanent value
Literary and/or artistic merit and excellence
Recognized performer, composer, director or artist
Records diversity of thought, expression, opinions, ideas, to make creative imagination freely available to all.
Selection responsibility
Decisions relating to selection and purchase all Audio/Visual materials will be the responsibility of the Manager of Extension Services
COLLECTIONS
Video and DVD collection
The library collects VHS and DVDs to supplement the print and non-print collections and to provide information that may not be available in any other format. The library
will migrate to an all Digital Video Disc (DVD) format retaining only those VHS titles that are not available in the DVD format.
Goals
The collection should be well balanced, serving the needs of the entire community. Materials will be selected for all ages & all levels of comprehension.
Materials will be considered in terms of timeliness, demand, quality, and authority
The collection will represent all sides of a wide range of issues.
Selection criteria
This collection consists of non-fiction and fiction video cassettes and DVDs in a wide variety of general subjects for all ages.
1. All general nonfiction subjects are purchased including the following:
Educational, informational, how-to, health related, travel, biography, etc.
Programs produced by network & non-premium cable TV, educational channels (e.g. A&E, Animal Planet, Discovery, Food Network, HGTV, History channel, National
Geographic, PBS, TLC, Travel channel, etc.)
Original Broadway plays & musicals.
Music & comedic performances appropriate for general audiences
2. Feature films
Notable Canadian productions
Films made for children & families
Films favorably reviewed by reputable, nationally recognized critics
Films judged by critics to be *Classics (production dates of 20 years or more) with some literary connection, i.e. play, book based.
Films of great cultural significance or considerable cult status
Animated cartoons appropriate for general audiences
Current releases will be considered on the basis of their literary, cinematic, and/or historical significance
3. Award winning films
Films that have won one or more of the following award will be considered for purchase.
Academy Awards
Golden Globe
Film festival entries based on reviews and relevance to collections and selection criteria
Music recordings
This collection consists of music recordings covering a wide variety of genres. The collection includes, but is not limited to, classical, country, rock, pop, jazz, gospel,
humor, folk, easy listening, rhythm and blues, new age, world, movie soundtracks, holiday and children.
Book recordings
This collection consists of spoken recording of adult fiction and non-fiction in unabridged format. The fiction collection includes classics and popular fiction. The
nonfiction collection covers a range of subject areas including bestsellers, instruction, self-improvement, language, etc.
New Media
From time to time new forms of AV media are introduced into the market place. Often these new products enjoy only brief popularity before losing their market to other
newer forms of AV media. Many of these newer forms of AV media require expensive playback equipment for use. New AV media forms are studied carefully to assess their
suitability for public library use, and sufficient time is allowed to properly determine whether they will receive lasting and widespread public acceptance before collection
of such new forms of media are added to the library.
When deciding whether to replace or augment existing formats with new media, the following factors are considered:
Anticipated improvements in information storage and retrieval
User demand
Quality of the product
Ease of use
Equipment requirements
Cost processing requirements
Maintenance
Retention/Weeding
Evaluation of the Audio/Visual collection is an on-going process. The following criteria considered when making the decision to retain, replace, or weed are:
Significance and relevance to current holdings
Presence of multiple copies
Titles in a series
Circulation statistics
Age and physical condition
Timeliness of materials
Shelf space
New technology.