We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
6119923, 190 PM (Case Digest PEOPLE v. JESUSANO ARCENAL Y AGUILAN,
by Ljean Hector Murphy
PEOPLE v. JESUSANO ARCENAL Y AGUILAN, GR No. 216015, 2017-03-27 (/juris/view/cf67b?
user=geS94VUVaeWdGWEO2MVJNMGVJUEV2dXVqOGtYMHR3bytT VnJpVUROQ)Yycz0=)
Facts:
Before Us for review is the May 12, 2014 Decision(1] of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CR-HC No.
05000, which affirmed the Decision[2] dated November 30, 2010 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch
27, Santa Cruz, Laguna in Criminal Case No. [Link] antecedent facts are as follows:Accused-appellant
Jesusano Arcenal y Aguilan (Arcenal) was charged with violation of Republic Act (R.A.) No. 6539 otherwise
known as Anti-Carnapping Act of 1972, as amended by R.A. No. 7659. The accusatory portion of the
Information reads:That on or about April 11, 2000, in the Municipality of Pila, Province of Laguna and within
the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the above-named accused, with intent to gain, by means of force and
violence and in the night time, which circumstances facilitated the commission of the offense, did then and
there willfully, unlawfully and feloniously take, steal and drive away a motorized Yamaha tricycle with Plate
No, DT-6680 valued at [P]22,000.00 owned and belonging to one RENATO DE RAMA, and which at the time
was driven by one ALVIN DE RAMA, against their will and consent and to the damage and prejudice of the
afore-named owner thereof in the said amount of TWENTY-TWO THOUSAND ([P]22,000.00) PESOS,
Philippine currency; that in the course of the commission of the aforesaid offense or on the occasion thereof,
the same [above-named] accused, while conveniently armed with an unestablished (sic) deadly
‘weapon/instrument, with intent to kill and with treachery and evident premeditation, did then and there
willfully, unlawfully and feloniously attack, assault, hit and strike with the said weapon/instrument the driver
of the same motorized tricycle, ALVIN DE RAMA, thereby inflicting upon the latter gaping wounds with
irregular edges on the right and occipital area of his head aside from the abrasions and hematomas on the
different parts of his body which directly caused his instantaneous death, to the damage and prejudice of his
surviving heirs.
The RTC convicted accused-appellant Arcenal of the crime of carnapping with homicide.
the CA affirmed the decision of the RTC in toto.
Issues:
Basically, the issue to be resolved by this Court in this appeal is whether the prosecution has successfully
proven beyond reasonable doubt that Arcenal is guilty of the crime of carnapping with homicide.
Ruling:
The elements of carnapping as defined and penalized under Republic Act (R.A) No. 6539, as amended, are the
following:That there is an actual taking of the vehicle; That the vehicle belongs to a person other than the
offender himself;That the taking is without the consent of the owner thereof; or that the taking was
hips tawyortphidigestCI67b7user=6608 we6119923, 190 PM (Case Digest PEOPLE v. JESUSANO ARCENAL Y AGUILAN,
committed by means of violence against or intimidation of persons, or by using force upon things; andThat
the offender intends to gain from the taking of the vehicle.
there was no eyewitness to the act of killing. However, this Court finds that the pieces of circumstantial
evidence presented before the trial court, which are consistent with one another, establishes Arcenal's guilt
beyond reasonable doubt.
3t. The tricycle was definitely ascertained to belong to Renato, as evidenced by a Deed of Absolute Sale[24]
in his favor Second. Alvin was last seen alive at the tricycle terminal at 11:00 [Link] April 11, 2000, as stated
in the direct testimonies of Flores and Meras:
Third. Alvin left the terminal with Arcenal, his lone passenger and back rider. Flores, who knew Arcenal
personally since the latter was also a resident of Pila, and had once been a tricycle driver, positively identified
Arcenal. In his direct testimony... Fourth. About 15 minutes after they left the terminal, Arcenal was scurrying
on board Alvin's tricycle coming from the Forest Park's direction. Flores was en route to the terminal after he
brought a passenger to Linga when he saw Arcenal driving the vehicle alone towards the direction of
Barangay Labuin-Fifth. At 6:05(28] a.m. on April 12, 2000, Alvin was found dead on the side of the road on
Forest Park with his tricycle patently missing. According to the autopsy report, his cause of death was shock
secondary to intra-cranial hemorrhage, secondary to trauma. Notably, there were three gaping wounds on
the right and left occipital area (at the back of the head), and contusion hematoma on the entire posterior
neck [Link]. When the vehicle was recovered, bloodstains were noted on the motorcycle and the
[Link]. The fingerprints lifted from the tricycle matched with Arcenal's right hand index finger.
According to the supplemental report, Dactyloscopy Report No. F-051-00-A,[29] eleven (11) ridges of the
fingerprints were identical in both the questioned and standard fingerprints. It proved that the lifted
fingerprint labeled as "Q-3" is identical with the right fingerprint of Arcenal,[
The fingerprints, which was confirmed as identical with Arcenal's, found on the vehicle not only substantiated
the testimonies of Flores and Meras that he was indeed Alvin's passenger but also established that he had
possession of the said vehicle.
Arcenal's fleeing with Alvi
his intent.
's tricycle showed his intent to gain. That it was later abandoned does not negate
the gaping wounds and hematoma at the back of Alvin's head and neck, Arcenal who was Alvin's back rider
passenger fled with the tricycle, and the bloodstains on the motorcycle and its side car — inevitably lead this
Court to conclude that the assault happened while Alvin was in the vehicle or was within its vicinity.
the police failed to locate Arcenal after learning from witnesses that the latter was last seen with Alvin and
was driving the vehicle alone thereafter.
Flight is an indication of his guilt or of a guilty mind. Indeed, the wicked man flees though no man pursueth,
but the righteous are as bold as a lion.
Principles:
hips tawyortphidigestCI67b7user=6608 22