Enhancing Student Engagement in Learning
Enhancing Student Engagement in Learning
GUESS PAPER-I
Q. Why do students lose interest in school work in General? What can the Teacher do to help them
renew their Interest in their Studies?
Ans. All of us must have had the experience ourselves or of those we know well losing interest in
sh1dics and wanting to give up - and even drop out - at some time or the other. Forhmatdy, these
negative moods change after some time in many cases. When these sh1dcnts get back to sh1dics, they
usually have a large backlog to deal with or may have lost a year. We need to note the distinction
between this general loss of interest and motivation, and negative attih1dc sh1dcnts sometimes
develop to a particular subject or topic or teacher. This will affect learning in that subject, but the
sh1dcnt might be doing quite well in other subjects, and on the whole be happy at school. The general
problem of interest and motivation is not linked to a particular subject or teacher. The negative
attih1dc seems to apply to practically all school activities, which can also lead to getting more isolated
and unhappy. There arc two possible causes of this condition. One is the feeling that everything is too
difficult and that there is no real help from teachers or sh1dcnts (friends). It could be that the sh1dcnt
started the term with many gaps in prior learning (readiness), but no diagnosis leading to appropriate
action was taken up. She/he would have found lessons difficult to follow from the beginning.
Sometimes other children may make fun of such sh1dcnts. Unit tests reinforce the fact of being far
behind others, and usually no help to improve is provided. All this can lead to feeling unable to do
anything successfully and a sense of worthlessness. (We will discuss this idea again under self -
esteem). Such loss of confidence often makes a child unwilling even to try, and interest and
motivation arc slowly lost. Such occurrences arc not the individual teacher's fault: the problem lie in
the larger system. The already overburdened teacher cannot provide intensive individual attention to
each sh1dcnt. However, the teacher can try and adapt the syllabus and materials to some extent. The
important point here is that teachers need to convey to 'weak' sh1dcnts that they (teachers) arc aware
of sh1dcnts' difficulties and arc trying to help them. Encouragement can be shown in small ways. The
feeling of being cared for matters greatly to such children. Children need to fed they arc welcome in
school and class, and also that they arc respected. The gentle pressure they feel should be to try and
keep trying, and not necessarily to succeed. Low motivation is nearly always a temporary condition
initially. It can become more pronounced if there is no support. But helping a sh1dcnt to overcome
loss of motivation and interest even in one subject area can have positive effect in other areas as well.
Thus, we can sec the value of creating and maintaining a supportive social climate in classrooms.
1
learning will be more comfortable and effective. A mismatch could result in obstacles to effective
learning.
Several different ways of describing and categorizing styles have been proposed by various scholars.
One survey found there were about 70 such models! Obviously, there is a lot of overlap, because
many different words arc used to talk about the same thing. We will look here only at a few
interesting styles sets of differences that might be relevant when planning for teaching. This overview
only provides a general background. Some of the interesting areas in which style differences have
been identified arc:
(i) Sensory preference: The word teaching is associated primarily with something the teacher
provides or docs - usually telling or presenting. Some input (received through the senses -
listening, seeing and feeling) is central to teaching-learning experiences especially in
relation to subject matter in the syllabus. Remember that the same message can be
conveyed or presented in different ways. For instance, when we have to give someone
directions for reaching a house from the station or bus stand, this can be done in different
ways - using words mainly, or words and gcsh1rcs or a diagram/map. Similarly, when
teaching a lesson, the presentation could use different types of sensory input. One
difference among learners is in the way of 'taking in' information, i.e., which one suits them
best. These arc orientations or preferences for the mode of sensory input. The possibilities
or options arc: visual, auditory, tactile and kinaesthetic. Visual is based on seeing. Sh1dcnts
with this orientation learn best from written statements (on the board or worksheets) and
pich1rcs, diagrams, models they can sec. Auditory is based on hearing. Spoken messages
(like teacher talk) seem best for some sh1dcnts to learn. Tactile (relating to touch) and
kinaesthetic (sense of moving body parts) arc taken together. Some sh1dcnts learn best
when they can touch and fed objects (especially models) or arc themselves moving (as in
demonstrations and role play).
Most teachers would say that they use all these 'methods' at different times during their
lessons. And they would be right. The point here is that specific ways of presenting
information can be chosen and used in a more planned manner after the teacher comes to
know about individual sh1dcnts' styles. This is especially useful when giving individual
attention to sh1dcnts or organizing activity in pairs or small groups. Sh1dcnts also differ in
the way they engage with or cognitively process the 'inputs' they receive. We now look at
these differences in the way children learn.
(ii) Whole or part focused learning: Some learners tend to focus more on general ideas or the
'big pich1rc', while others pay much more attention to the small details. This has also been
described as the global versus sequential style of processing information. Some sh1dcnts
learn better when the teacher presents and discusses general ideas and assigns related
tasks; they may have a tendency to 'switch off' when a lot of time is spent on small details.
But others may respond well to specifics and details, and fed somewhat lost when the focus
is on abstract ideas. This orientation is related to a broader factor called field dependence
field independence. Field dependent individuals arc influenced by the context. For
example, in a group where most people favour one opinion in a set of possibilities, they arc
more likely to agree with others. Those who arc more field independent arc better able to
sec basic facts or arguments by themselves. This docs not mean that they arc independent
thinkers or misfits. Their style of thinking is more analytical, that is all.
2
(iii) Inductive vs. deductive learning: Inductive learning occurs when a body of specific facts or
data is given and effort is directed to finding pattcrn(s) or inferring a general principle.
Tasks involving trying out possible explanations - exploring without knowing beforehand
what is the best thing to do-involves such learning. Grammar is often taught inductively
in deductive learning, usually a mlc or principle is given to begin with, and the discussion
is on its implications and applications. Many problems in mathematics and science involve
sets of deductions. Herc too it is found that some students arc more comfortable and learn
better with the first of these approaches. They seem to enjoy finding things out for
themselves - learning by discovery. Other sh1dcnts arc more comfortable when principles
and mies arc stated, and the challenge is to understand and apply them.
(iv) Convergent thinking vs. divergent thinking: This dimension is related to the distinction
sometimes made between 'intelligence' and 'creativity'. Psychologists who have studied the
way people deal with problems that require thinking and analysis have found two broad
approaches. The more common one is to analyse the problem logically using relevant
knowledge from mathematics or biology or economics, and then proceed systematically
step by step towards the solution. There is a gradual progress of narrowing down -or
converging - to the solution. This is rather similar to the deductive approach mentioned
above. Some people do not go directly to the problem as given. They will look at it from
different angles and sometimes even try to change or reformulate it. This can lead to
unusual or creative suggestions. The process here is one of opening up or widening the
discussion. That is why the term divergent is used. Many innovations or discoveries in
science and new theories have come from people who were divergent in their thinking.
However, both approaches arc useful and important. Having convergent and divergent
thinking sh1dcnts in the same class is a great resource. The problems introduced in class
should allow both types to try their approaches and share their experiences. These learning
styles were mentioned here mainly to illustrate what they arc. There arc many others. Note,
that there arc no 'good' or 'bad' styles. What we have seen arc equally useful and effective
alternative ways of learning. If teachers can organize some aspects of their teaching to
match the styles of different students, this could facilitate better learning. To enhance the
chances of such matching of styles, teachers need to add more variety to their teaching
styles- by including more types of presentations and activities in their lesson plans. They
need not know all the names and definitions of several learning styles. Once they have the
basic concept, as they interact with successive batches of learners, they will recognize
different learning styles. This knowledge can guide them when planning their teaching.
Personality dispositions -feelings, emotions and social interactions
The term personality is a familiar one. When we talk about and describe individuals, we always say
something about their personality - their typical ways of behaving in their daily lives and especially
when relating to others. This is something in addition to and different from their abilities and skills,
achievements, stah1s and so on. When sh1dcnts write about 'my favourite teacher', ' my hero' these
personal qualities arc emphasized. These arc fairly stable qualities or characteristics of a person
(referred to as traits), and can be seen even in children. The study of personality is one of the major
sub-fields of psychology, and involves many different theories and models. Several personality
dimensions have been proposed. We will look at a few of them here to get a sense of what personality
factors arc. They arc of interest because they seem to influence learning, but in a different manner
than the more cognitive factors we just looked at.
3
One widely mentioned list of personality dimensions (called the big five) - aspects on which
individuals differ - are the following
Extraversion - Introversion
A person near the extraversion end is generally active, energetic, outgoing, talkative and friendly
Openness - Closed Mindedness
A person high on openness is likely to be curious, imaginative, original and has wide interests.
Conscientiousness - Undirected Ness
A person high on conscientiousness behaves in an organized, efficient manner and is thorough and
reliable in getting things done.
Agreeableness - Antagonism
An agreeable person is generally good nah1red, kind, tmsting, generous, modest and appreciative.
Neuroticism - Stability
A person high on neuroticism is often anxious and insecure, gets upset easily and shows signs of self
pity.
This is only an outline. The descriptions above are not at all complete. They give us a general sense of
what psychologists treat as aspects of personality. We must note carefully that we cannot put people
(especially children) into such categories. Even psychologists who conduct elaborate tests are careful
about this. What is important here is that these personality dispositions are fairly stable -almost
nah1ral qualities of a person. They are not expressions of conscious and deliberate decisions to act in
particular ways-they are like all established habits one does not think about. Some dispositions of
children (see examples below) seem to be positive for classroom participation and others less so. The
teacher must remember that a child with a certain disposition is not doing anything deliberately.
Let us consider personality related differences among children. Look at the examples below of
different types of learners we might see in a class:
• an extroverted child who is active and talkative and likes to be interacting with others
• a child who is more introverted and does not participate actively in group work.
• a child who is anxious and gets easily discouraged,
• a cl1ild who seems inattentive and careless about work and does not complete assignments,
• a child who seems keenly interested in new ideas and activities and enjoys engaging with
them
We should recognize that no such 'type' is good or bad in itself. Also, as noted already, these ways of
behaving are not conscious choices made by individuals. Teachers should appreciate that they
represent children's habihrnl styles or predispositions, and accept them without judging them. It is
trne that in the conventional classroom, some types seem not well adjusted. Scolding or putting
pressure on a child whose behaviour seems 'negative' will not help. As far as possible they should be
involved in other activities. There are spaces within the curriculum where a shy and withdrawn child
or even the child who seems careless is not a 'problem'. Remember that a high-pressure competitive
classroom is not the ideal, though it is commonly found. The classroom climate can be changed. As
teachers understand such predispositions of children and work sensitively with them, these children
too can learn successfully; they may also contribute to others' learning in small ways. And to repeat
an earlier point, changes in aspects of personality can occur, but only slowly and based on a lot of
supportive interaction.
Some further dimensions of personality
Another aspect of personality which is fairly easy to see is self-esteem. This is related to confidence
and a capacity to accept challenges, take risks and risk failure without much anxiety. A person with
4
high self-esteem is able to accept criticism, and is not worried about being unpopular at times.
Teachers and peers arc forhmatc when there arc such sh1dcnts in class. There will also be others low
on self-esteem. We can be sure that they were not born that way. They must have been through many
negative experiences in the past both in and out of school. Using the many types of sihiations and
activities of the total curriculum to provide such children positive experiences is not very difficult for
teachers using the support of peers. Some people have a marked tendency to be strongly influenced
by the opinions of those around them. This disposition is called social conformity. While all members
of society arc expected to generally follow group norms and obey rules and so on, a certain degree of
independence and thinking for oneself is also treated as normal and healthy. A child who seems
always to watch what others do and say, and tries to follow them and 'not be different' would be high
on the social conformity dimension. This is not the same as low ability and confidence. Such a sh1dcnt
might be getting quite good grades, but may not participate in group activities where each child has
to contribute his/her own ideas and opinions, and may try to avoid tasks calling for innovation.
Q. What was the difference between the Traditional curriculum and the present-day Curriculum?
What is learner Autonomy?
Ans. In the sections above we have looked at some of the ways in which individuals differ. The focus
has been on individuals as persons - who have their own thoughts, feelings, hopes, needs and so on.
The focus has been on these psychological aspects, which lie beyond the more obvious physical ones
such as sex, age, physical development, health. The survey has been brief and has covered only some
of the many possible dimensions of individual differences. Even so we have gained a sense of how
vast and rich human diversity can be. A class of 35 or even a small group of 10 has children whose
unique personalities will lead to different patterns of learning. This diversity can be seen as a resource
now, and we need to try and adapt the 'standard curriculum' to suit individual needs. This is a big
challenge of course, but the new approach to the curriculum also has a source of support. This is the
principle that the child relates ideas coming as inputs in lessons to her/his life outside the school and
thus becomes an active cocrcator of new knowledge. This knowledge will be personal and therefore
different for different children. In other words, we do not have to try to make every child in a class
learn exactly the same things, in the same manner at the same rate which was the tmdcrlying
principle of the traditional curriculum. In a traditional classroom, the given syllabus was covered
following the required or recommended method. Individual teachers tried to give so called weak
sh1dcnts some special help. Those who could not meet the requirements 'failed' and dropped out of
the system and were forgotten. The RTE made drastic change in this process. Every child had the
"right to education of quality" through the elementary stage (till Class VIII), which meant no failures,
no dropouts. Obviously, the education in this framework has to be flexible in many ways. It is
necessary in a public education system to have an official syllabus and a prescribed textbook. These
can have some clements of flexibility, but the real flexibility and adaptation occurs in the day-to-day
transactions in class. This too is not something the teacher docs following a detailed lesson plan with
many parallel segments - but rather a process based on the joint activity of the teacher and the
learners.
Flexible classroom transaction as described above involves learners' active participation. Active
participation is not only doing what is asked for in exercises and tasks which is typically the same for
all sh1dcnts. It means importantly that learners contribute their ideas and suggestions, ask questions
to keep the activity going-and not only give answers to questions already raised by the teacher or in
the textbook. This points to initiative and independence on the part of sh1dcnts who arc members of a
5
team working together (with their different skills and styles) for the benefit of all. Such cooperative
activity is an opportunity both to know about others' talents, styles and needs and to respect them.
Leamer independence and autonomy
These two terms arc often used interchangeably. Both point to the capacity to learn on one's own -
without relying heavily on the teacher's inputs and guidance. Such a capacity is seen as an asset in the
broad setting of a learner centred education. It is especially desirable for sh1dcnts of a second or
foreign language who do not normally use this language for social communication outside class.
Developing communication skills in a second or foreign language will be greatly aided by the
learners' own efforts to extend contact with the language by using or practicing it outside class. The
typical five sessions a week of classroom contact can only provide a base. Much more effort by the
learner is needed for effective skill development. Even intensive courses of 100 or 150 hours spread
over about 6 weeks cannot in any way be complete. So, the learner's own efforts arc important.
Another perspective on learner independence has come from the distance and open learning sectors.
For courses in this mode there arc no time tabled 'teaching sessions. Well-designed course material is
provided -- in print and audio-visual media. The sh1dcnt has to find a suitable place and time to
'sh1dy' -keeping to a schedule of 15 (for example) hours a week. Such courses arc thus based on self
managed or self-directed learning. The effort and discipline have to come from within. We can sec
here that the personal quality of independence or autonomy is important - for all areas of sh1dy, not
only language. It is also tmc that the use of modem technology (ICT) in education is linked to modes
of learning which arc different from sh1dcnts and live-teacher interaction. This is not to say that the
classroom has no importance any more, but rather that classroom-based instmction has to be
complemented as well as supplemented. Herc again the learner's initiative is called upon.
6
educationists lowered the bar for them. This created an isolation of another sort and the
education gap continued to widen.
(ii) Assimilation: The second phase of the education of the underprivileged is marked by a
tendency to assimilate. Attempts were made to educate the underprivileged learners along
with the privileged learners in the same school. But castcism and class consciousness came
in the way and it was the case of isolation-assimilation as learners of lower castes sat in the
same class but on separate benches or were relegated to the last benches where they seldom
received the teacher's attention. Since the school and the system of education was based on
the dominant or the advantaged group, the aim was to assimilate the underprivileged into
the privileged culh1rc. This attempt is still on and according to the Right to Education, it is
mandatory for elite private schools meant for the privileged sections of society to keep 25%
of the scats for the underprivileged and also to look after their education monetarily. How
much of this genuinely happens is a matter of concern.
(iii) Integration: In the third phase of integration, attempts were first made to educate the
underprivileged in their own language and culhirc so that they would develop a positive
attih1dc to their own culhirc and language. Depending on these approaches or stages,
mainly three theories have been put forth to explain the poor achievement of the unreached
learner: these varied from innate or hereditary qualities, to culh1ral deprivation in their
environment or to the deficiency in the instih1tion (school) itself.
Although these three stages have been historically noted there have been instances where all the three
co-existed at the same time in some states.
Some Interventions
It has been noticed universally that the system of education is targeted at the privileged in society and
the curricular content, both in its selection and nahirc, mirrors the life of the privileged. The textbooks
appeared alien to the underprivileged learners as they did not find any resemblance to their lives or
their culh1rc in the textbooks. In addition, the methods of teaching too were developed on certain
assumptions of pre-knowledge which led to a gap in understanding for the underprivileged.
Similarly, the teachers suffered from biases and an unfriendly attih1dc towards these learners which
either led to the neglect of these learners or a simplification of the content and assignments, making
them repetitive and boring. As early as the 60's, 'The Kothari Commission (1964-66) articulated the
idea of a "neighbourhood" school as a common space, where all children cutting across caste, class
and gender lines learn together in the best inclusive manner. This idea has been articulated in
practically all policy documents thereafter: the National Policy on Education 1968, as well as the
National Curriculum Framework, 2005. This concept has also been incorporated in the RTE Act, 2009.'
(AnshuVaish, Secretary, School Education and Literacy, in her speech at Shri Ram School) It has also
been felt that the inclusion of underprivileged learners in schools, either government or private, has
not been implemented fully, remaining a mere lip service in certain instih1tions. There is a clear
demarcation between the schools for the privileged (privately-nm schools) and those for the
underprivileged (schools nm by the government) and these cater to two distinct categories and
economic strata. This segregation starts at an early stage in school; and many private schools feel
reluctant to follow a policy of integrating children from the socio-economically weaker sections of
society with those from the better-off strata. The education policies of the government like the
Univcrsalization of Elementary Education (UEE), Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, the Right to Education Act
and the policy of neighbourhood schools arc attempts to assimilate and integrate the underprivileged
learners into the mainstream. In spite of these, certain assumptions need to be revisited and some
7
interventions are required to realise these policies. By opening of the Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya,
the Government of India has made quality education accessible to rural learners.
(i) Curriculum: The curriculum of the schools largely focuses on the skills and knowledge
required for an individual to be integrated into the society of the middle class and white
collared jobs. Skills and knowledge required for blue-collared jobs are neglected except for
certain special schools and instih1tions. The textbooks are written from the point of view of
the culh1re of the privileged. Contribution of the underprivileged class to nation building is
neglected or ignored. Facts and information are densely packed in the textbook which seem
suitable for highly motivated learners. Since the underprivileged learners find nothing of
their lives, history or culh1re in the textbooks they find these irrelevant to their experiences
and thereby lose interest. A simplified curriculum for these learners is created based on the
assumption that the underprivileged learners would not be able to handle this. This further
demoralizes them, and moreover they are not stimulated intellechrnlly.
A conscious attempt needs to be made to make the curriculum not only attractive but also
challenging for the underprivileged learners. Some of the suggested interventions are listed
below:
• Inclusion of topics of interest or familiarity for the underprivileged learners
• Reflection of the lives and culh1re of the underprivileged as equal contributors to
society.
• Removal of biases in favour of the privileged
• Content should aim at fostering a positive attih1de towards their lives and culh1re.
• Illustration could include tribal art and styles that represent their culh1re and lifestyles.
• Stimulating but linguistically simple questions to help them develop their cognitive
and analytical skills.
(ii) Teaching Methods: Sh1dies in teaching methodology to the privileged and the
underprivileged learners have revealed that teachers offer differential instruction to the
privileged and the underprivileged.
In a sh1dy of African-American and Hispanic sh1dents in America, it was found that the
'novice readers' were taught differently from the advanced readers. The advanced readers
received more instruction in critical thinking while instmction for the novice readers was
restricted to rote learning, drill and memorization. The impact of this was felt later in high
school when it was noticed that the underprivileged learners could not do problems where
critical thinking was involved as they were not introduced to it in their primary school. It
was also assumed by the teachers that the advanced readers received more reinforcement
from their parents whereas the sh1dy proved that both sets of parents reinforced the
learning of their wards. Sh1dies have also shown that 'the typical classroom environment
tends to (and is intended to) mirror the interactive milieu of a typical middle-class home
(very different from a typical lower-class home) hence the sh1dents find himself in an
environment he does not fully understand but is expected to fit into'. (Marsha Cope et al)
Thus, in a way the education system is stifling the progress of these learners and not
teaching them to overcome their circumstances and strive for excellence. The assumption
remains that the underprivileged will not be able to compete with their privileged peers.
If education has to be 'empowering' to the underprivileged learner then the following
interventions can be made:
8
• The learners can be given a choice of choosing subjecl'> for writing and books for
reading.
• Discussions and activities in the classroom could also focus on topics that touch the
lives of these sh1dents.
• They should be allowed to work on collaborative projects and allowed to make
decisions about the choice of topic, method or group members.
• They should be encouraged to talk about and write about their own lives and
experiences and these should be treated with respect in the classroom.
(iii) Evaluation procedures: A way of overcoming the problem of drop out was the government
policy of non-detention at the primary level. It was understood that the teachers would
ensure that 80% of the sh1dents would master 80% of the content and skill so that no one is
detained. But this was misunderstood as a 'pass all' policy, as a result of which, learners
who had not obtained even 10% of learning were promoted. On the one hand the teachers
did not work with the learners to ensure learning and on the other hand the learners lost all
motivation, comfortable in the thought that merely the basic required attendance would
take them to the next class. This only helped in widening the gap in knowledge and as the
learners reached the higher classes they found it difficult to concephialize or analyse, not
having mastered the basic concepts. They also were deficient in the skills of taking the tests
which were of only the paper pencil kind and summative in nahire.
The focus has slowly shifted from paper pencil tests to continuous and comprehensive
evaluation that takes into account the different learning styles and diverse capabilities of
the learners and proposes stress-free activities and procedures for evaluating the learners
on a continuous basis. It is hoped that the underprivileged learners will be encouraged to
participate in different activities and display their strengths in some of them. Today the
gamut of evaluation activities would encompass content, life skills (cognitive, social and
emotional skills), learners' own goal-setting and self-assessment. This will require a lot of
teacher preparation not only in evaluation procedures but also in removal of biases from
the testing procedures. Since the evaluation is holistic it would be essential to make the
tests relevant to the context of the learners. Forty percent of the evaluation would be
conducted by the teacher with whom the learners have been working closely, hoping
thereby that the element of bias and unfair evaluation would be eliminated. This is because
the teacher himself or herself would be the evaluator and not an outside agency, who has
no knowledge of the needs and problems of different learners. Although it is important to
inspire the underprivileged learner to compete with the others and strive towards
excellence, a few provisions like clear instmctions (perhaps in their own language), extra
time during their initial stages of test taking need to be made. Test taking skills of these
learners would have to be sharpened and the criteria of evaluation explained well to them
so that they can focus appropriately when they take a test. If the teachers allowed the
learners to improve at their own pace and provided a lot of scaffolding, in place of
simplifying or merely lowering the bar for them, the underprivileged learners would be
able to reduce the gap in achievement. One way of reducing stress and improving the
performance of the underprivileged learners is to give collaborative tasks and projects
wherein these learners get an opporhmity to work with their peers and learn from them, at
the same time feel comfortable tmder the common umbrella of the group.
9
(iv) Education through the language and dialect of underprivileged learners: Educationists
agree that education in the early stages ought to be in the learner's home language before
introducing them to any other language. The three-language formula too recommends the
use of home language or the regional language in the primary stage. It is believed that it is
easier to develop the skills of reading and writing in the learner's home language. Learners
can transfer some of the skills to the other language once they arc fluent in their own
language. In a country like India, where the culh1ral diversity is very wide, even the
regional language may prove to be difficult to the underprivileged learner who is perhaps
exposed to only the dialect of home and community.
To some extent this problem in learning a second language can be overcome by using a
multilingual method in the initial stages and then slowly weaning them away from their
own language and using the second language and third languages in the classroom.
(v) Teacher Preparation: Teacher preparation is of utmost importance as it is the teacher who
would execute the suggested methods or take the process forward. However good the
material, its efficacy can be felt only in the hands of an efficient teacher. Most sihtations of
teaching and learning require improvisation, on the spot modification and drawing
associations across subjects. This is tmc of the teaching learning sih1ations for the
underprivileged. The teacher needs to be sensitive to the needs of the learners, be
innovative to draw references or make modifications to make the topic or activity
understandable and doable for the learners. The teacher's role in making the topic relevant
to the learners in the classroom is immense as the curriculum framer and textbook writer
only keeps some general guidelines in mind.
The teacher thus needs to be trained and sensitised to the following aspects:
• Using a variety of methods to convey a single idea
• Addressing the needs of the target group and overcoming biases
• Making the topic interesting and relevant
• Developing the skills of reading and writing amongst learners with 'experiential
deficiency'
• Removing bias in the material, if any
• Treating all learners alike and encouraging the underprivileged children to perform to
the best of their capabilities.
10
bridge the gaps. The unreached children should be allowed to make their decisions on
topics for study, for projects or writing tasks.
(ii) Introduction to critical thinking skills: It is essential that teachers introduce the
underprivileged learners to critical thinking skills from an early stage. This will help them
to become analytical and be able to make decisions. Earlier we had discussed how these
learners are more mahire than those from comfortable homes. Asking them open-ended
questions or allowing them to choose the topics or books for projects and reading
workshops would assure them that the teacher does not believe them to be cognitively
deficient. If complemented with support whenever the learners require, it would lead to a
positive self-image.
They can also be encouraged to explore their own backgrounds which will help them to set
pragmatic goals.
(iii) Selection of relevant topics: Topics for classroom discussion and writing tasks would have
to be sensitively selected to ensure that these fall within the experiences of the
underprivileged learner's that one is teaching. If care is taken not to select topics of which
the learners have no knowledge, the learners will never feel a sense of inadequacy. When
the learners will be able to identify with the topic, they would take interest and the task will
be completed. If the focus is on their lives and their dreams, learners will move from a state
of resignation to motivation and goal setting. Similarly, some of the topics used in the
books need to be related to the lives of these learners, keeping in view the culh1ral
diversity. If for the reading project the learners are allowed to exercise their choice on the
kind of books they would like to read, the problem of involvement gap that was discussed
in the earlier part of the Unit will be bridged. Younger children may choose to read very
simple books which may be meant for children younger than them. They should be allowed
to exercise this choice and slowly graduate to books meant for their level. It is very
important to promote the culhire of reading.
(iv) Adequate Sc affolding and support: The role of scaffolding like giving task that these
learners find relevant, explaining the task, breaking it up into doable smaller tasks,
encouraging them to do the task and last but not the least providing the support of peers by
way of collaborative work, cannot be undermined. In addition to the process writing
approach, the teacher can also use the process approach to grammar as well. Instead of
doing a grammar item formally and in isolation, learners can do speaking or writing tasks
in which they practise the grammar item in a meaningful and contextual manner.
Collaborative and cooperative learning modes will also provide for peer evaluation and
peer editing of written work or project reports. This will lead to removal of errors in a more
supportive environment.
(v) Use Mother-tongue based Multilingualism: In the initial stages underprivileged learners
can be exposed to bilingual methods wherein they can contribute their ideas in their own
language or the teacher repeats her instrnctions in their language. This may be done in a
nah1ral manner without making the underprivileged learners feel that this is a special
concession in view of their inadequate language skills. At the primary level, questions
should be formed in a way that the expected response can be only a word or a group of
words. If the teacher continues to insist on answering in a complete sentence, they feel de
motivated as they find the syntax of the English language very different from theirs. They
should be encouraged to do language tasks that focus not on the language but on
11
completion of the task. To conclude, it can be said that if the learners arc provided with a
positive self-image and their expectations arc kept high while giving a lot of support in a
less obvious manner, they would be able to learn effectively
12
that the city offers. The electronic media has reduced this alienation to a large degree, for
these people arc now aware of many things that form the lifestyle of the middle class.
(iv) Culturally disadvantaged: The 'culh1rally disadvantaged' may belong to ethnic minorities,
certain demographic groups like the slum dwellers or tribes untouched by education. They
have poor stimulus for learning and their exposure to even the regional language is
negligible.
Q. At what stage do children face problems of writing? What kind of problems do they face?
Ans. Writing is a complex activity and demands an integration of several different skills. Writing
involves:
• selection of ideas
• expressing the ideas in words and sentences
• mechanics of writing (like handwriting, spelling, format etc.)
• motor skills of forming letters in writing or typing (if on a computer)
According to Johnson and Myklebust (1967) difficulties in writing may occur at different stages and in
different areas. These could be in:
• planning and selection of ideas
• expression in language
• spelling
• handwriting (fine motor skills)
Difficulty in planning and selection of ideas: In the initial stages' learners arc expected to copy
words and phrases in blanks from a box in a highly controlled manner. Planning and coordination arc
not required much in classes 1 and 2. Difficulties will become evident when the learner is expected to
do some guided or free writing which involves coordination of planning, sentence strnch1rc and
spelling. Writing tasks like writing stories, letters, describing personal things or writing about
personal experience may show evidence of writing difficulties. The difficulty in planning and
selection of ideas can be due to basic language difficulty with inadequate vocabulary, expression and
general knowledge. The cause of the difficulty may be traced back to the child's early years when the
s/hc was not exposed to reading, books, stories or oral communication due to the home environment.
Another kind of writing difficulty can be seen amongst children who can read well and have a good
oral language but arc unable to express themselves in writing. They may be very active in the class
responding to questions orally or reading well but writing poorly. A child can be placed in different
levels of writing ability and then by means of focused activities helped to reach the next stage and
progress to the required level.
Concrete-description Level: The child at the concrete-description level can convert thought into oral
language but has limited written expression. The teacher can help the child by using the following
methods:
Initially making the child write very simple sentences which arc copied.
Showing the child an object and asking the child to think of as many ways as she can to describe the
object: long yellow pencil, nice yellow pencil, new colour pencil etc.
Next is asking a child to describe an object along different dimensions like its shape, colour, size and
USC.
Concrete-imaginative Level: This level requires the child to use imagination. The activities at this
level arc initially done verbally. Later the child is encouraged to write the phrases. The child can be
encouraged to write simple sentences by looking at pich1rcs and asking the child questions about the
13
sequence like what is happening, what will happen next and what the person will feel at that time,
etc.
By doing this the child is able to manipulate ideas into past and fuhirc events, or imagine what a
person in a pichirc is doing or infer where a person may be or what the person is planning to do next.
Abstract-descriptive Level: This is the next level in writing wherein the child can write longer pieces
of text using a visual or verbal stimulus like pichircs to be sequenced in a kind of story before writing
the story. Initially the number of pichircs is restricted to 3-4 and later increased and more events
introduced.
Gradually the child begins to present different characters in the story and may give them
characteristics based on perception and experience. Children can also be encouraged to write short
plays.
Abstract-imaginative Level: This is a sophisticated level and only a few sh1dcnts of the primary
school can attain it. However, children can be made to work collaboratively and develop a story with
the following guidelines. They can use the original plot, create characters, create a sihiation and
narrate it in a fairly interesting manner
The story should have:
• an imaginative setting
• a sequenced plot
• a message that can be concluded from it
The writing activity can be preceded with a preparation where in the teacher holds a discussion and
gives them direction. The teacher can also provide the sh1dcnts a set of questions to address so that
they can produce a more mahirc text.
Difficulties with grammatical structure: The second requirement for a piece of writing is that it
should be presented in adequately formed sentences and paragraphs. The other difficulty children
face is with developing sentences with correct grammatical struch1rc.
The teacher can help such children by using the methods given below:
• First encourage them to create clear and interesting sentences orally through discussion and
then transfer them onto writing.
• Use topics that interest the child so that s/hc is encouraged to talk about it before putting it
down on paper
• Practice in meaningful discourse.
Q. Does the teacher's response help them prepare for their next Internal Assessment?
Ans. Formative Evaluation, as we all know, informs us about how individual sh1dcnts arc
progressing in relation to the target learning outcomes. What is most often neglected is, how it may be
used to teach the learner what to learn and how to learn it. In other words, formative evaluation
procedures, if designed and implemented to help sh1dents, can guide them to learn independently.
Instead of treating them as testing tools, we may use them to support learning.
The following sihiation and the teacher's response helps us understand her attih1dc to formative
evaluation.
The teacher evaluated and rch1rncd the answer scripts. Quite a few students thought that they had
done their internal assessment reasonably well and felt disappointed by the marks they were given.
When the class was over, a few of them followed her to the staff room. After a good deal of hesitation,
one of them came up and asked the only question they all wanted to ask, "Teacher, I expected a
higher score for this question. Have I not answered it correctly?"
14
The teacher said, "The answer is correct. But, you have not organized it well". Her other comments
were on vocabulary, grammar, paragraphing, handwriting etc. The sh1dcnts felt discouraged and no
wiser. She also carefully defended and justified all her evaluation procedures; she discussed every
response, answered all their questions patiently, and added a few marks here and there. They left
feeling better.
Q. What, in your opinion, are the strengths of Transacting language through Literature?
Ans. Some of the reasons for using the English textbooks could be:
• They arc prescribed in the syllabus.
• They provide easy access to texts that can help develop the language abilities of learners.
• Similarity in standards of learning English.
• It is difficult for an ordinary teacher to think of suitable material that can be used in class.
• All learners can access these easily.
The question that arises next is what should be done with the textbooks in class?
Most textbooks include prose pieces such as short stories, extracts from biographies, descriptions,
newspaper reports, along with some selections from poetry and drama. These arc samples of
litcrah1rc, but the idea behind their inclusion is:
• They seem appropriate to the learners' age and context.
• Learners ought to be oriented to readings from different kinds of discourses.
• They present different aspects of humanity thereby broadening the learners' perspective.
• Literary language is suited to the development of learners' language abilities.
• Reading literary texts help learners in understanding and appreciating the multiple levels of
meanings.
• Learners can become familiar with a range of styles of writing and the different purposes for
which they can be used.
• Litcrah1rc provides the learners with a concrete context for language use.
The 'Language through Litcrah1rc' approach helps the learners in achieving their main aim -which is
to improve their knowledge of, and proficiency in, English. Literary texts arc perceived as a resource
to stimulate language activities - especially for classes VI-X
15
A few tasks that can be undertaken in the class arc listed here:
• Read untitled poems. Select appropriate titles from the list of titles provided along with
discussion: reasons for choice of title.
• Predict 'what happens next?' after reading till a specific point
• Read a story and write dialogues for the same.
• Guess the meaning of the words from the given context.
• Read a scene from the play and devise role play on what happens next.
• Choose the most accurate review/ summary of a short story.
• Develop and complete a time line based on what they have read.
• Decide which traits suit a character best.
• Fill in the crossword with the help of the given clues. This task is based on the words from the
text being read in class.
• Listen to the discussion and identify which characters from the story arc being referred to.
• Assume that you arc a character from the story and write a diary entry/ letter. ..
16
BEGS-185: English Language Teaching
GUESS PAPER-2
17
approaches to teaching English call for integrating language abilities in class in order to prepare
learners to face real life sihiations.
Read the given list of tasks and activities that can be included as part of the reading lessons.
• Talk in pairs/groups about the theme/context being taken up in the reading passage/ lesson.
Share this with the class.
• Show the class the pich1rcs of a couple of characters from what is to be read. Ask them to
imagine who they arc, how arc they related and what kind of conversation arc they likely to
be a part of. This activity is to be undertaken at pair/group level. Possible answers to be listed
on board before reading.
• Enact a role play based on the poem.
• Work with a partner. Read the following extracts of poems and discuss the word pich1rcs
(imagery) that you read.
• Imagine you arc an interviewer from 'Times of India'. Interview the characters from the story
to establish the tmth about events. Work in groups of 4.
• Read the newspaper clipping and compare the facts with the events in the story.
• Complete these words puzzle with words from the passage.
• Work in groups of four. Think of an alternative ending. What changes arc needed in the story
to accommodate this ending?
• Which of the cartoons describes the meaning of the given passage best?
• Given below is a partially filled table. Fill it on the basis of the given passage.
• Convert this story /poem into a play.
• Compare this play / story with the movie.
• Complete the cartoon strip on the basis of the story / passage read.
• Fill in the missing sentences of dialogues. Use your own words.
• Write out the dialogues for the story you just read. Work in groups of four.
• You've read the story. Now listen to two characters from the story. Identify who could these
be based on the character traits displayed in the story. Give reasons for your answer.
• Imagine you arc one of the characters from the story. Write a diary entry/ letter. Enact / Role
play a scene from the text read.
18
or feedback by the teacher (Smclair and Coulthard, 1975). In later versions of the model, F became
follow- up. This model is referred to as the IRF sequence, as illustrated below:
Extract 1.1
(I) Teacher There are two thmgs that the wnter establishes at the beginning
ofth<.> <:tory Om• 1<: ,;1tuahon ,1tm1tmn Wh:it 1<; the ,;ituahon at the hegmnmg
of the story? Anybody? What's the -;1tuat1on Amta? Have you read the story
Amta?
(R) Student No ma'am
(F) Teacher Ah that won't help then will 1t? Who's read the story? What 1s
the -;1tuatton at the bcgmnmg Rahul?
As you can see m the above Extract 1.1, for every utterance made by a learner (R), teachers typically
make two (l,F). Thus, teacher talk (speech of the teacher m the classroom) represents approXJmately
two-thirds of classroom speech. It is both parbcular to the classroom and charactenzed by it. Tlus is
the traditional IRF mteraction which prevails m most classrooms.
Musllllle□ (1996) discusses four reasons for the dommance of the IRF sequence m our classrooms:
• Teachers' and students' expectabons consider quesbon and answer roubnes as appropnate
classroom behaviour. Tlus is how conversabon m a classroom is charactenzed.
• Teachers feel the need to make learners 'feel good'. The feedback given by a teacher to a
student is impo1iant and necessary.
• The system of power relabons m most classes means that it 1s the teacher who has more of the
'floor' owmg to asymmetncal roles.
• Fmally, the time constraints facmg teachers make them believe that quesbon and answer
roubnes are the most effective means of advancmg classroom discourse.
However, experts have frequently highlighted that the IRF sequence has a negative effect on
classroom commurucation because it gives nummum mteractional space to the learners. The teacher
talk considerably mcreases and learners don't get enough opporturuties for language use. In order to
fac1htate leammg m the classroom we need to grant greater parbc1pation nghts to our learners and
allow them to play a more central role m classroom mteraction. If our classroom discourse is
donunated by the IRF sequence then mteracbon can become very mechanical and also monotonous.
We need to be aware of tlus and we should conscrously try to break the IRF pattern. In the followmg
secbons we will discuss vanous strategies that we can use to make our classroom discourse
mteracbng and effective.
In the L2 classroom, teachers control both the content and the procedure of the learmng process. L2
classes exhibit some typical charactensbcs:
• teachers control the topic of discuss10n,
• teachers control who may parbc1pate and when, students take the:ir cues from teachers,
• role relabonsh1ps between teachers and learners are unequal, teachers are responsible for
managing the mteracbon which occurs, teachers talk more.
Thus, one may conclude that teachers often control both the content and structure of classroom
commumcabon, at least m part, by then use of language. Furthermore, the:ir decrs10n as to whether to
hghtly control the topic of discuss10n or whether to allow a more egahtanan discourse structure m
which students self select and have a more equal share m turn- taking, is not random. Thus, teachers
influence learner parbc1pation both by the ways m which they use language and by what they bnng
to the classroom. Therefore, it is important to be aware of our language use m the classroom. In
19
Extract 12 below, for example, note how the teacher selects who may talk (turn 1), controls the topic
of conversation (1), selects another speaker (7), evaluates the learner's performance (3, 5, 7), manages
both language form (what's the verb in 5) and the message (they go to in 5) Note too how the
predominance of an IRF structure characterizes tlus extract as a piece of classroom discourse
Extract 1.2
I) /) Teacher Ok Rua could you exp/am somethmg about law and order
m our country?What happens ifyou comm/t a crime?
2) R) Learner I. /fwe do crane policeman come to take somebody to police
station
3) F) Teacher Yes
4) R) Learner/. and prisoner quewoned and 1f he ts (5 seconds
1111111tel/1g1ble)
5) Fil) Teacher. Yes what '.s tlte verb Rita if site or he yes commm a
cmne they go to...
6) R) Lem nerl l'l1ey go to court but if they he they d1dn t do that
the y can go home
7) Fil) leacher They can go home ( .. ) ve1J' good 111deed nght what
lwppe11s Ill the cow t?
Thus, we find how the teacher controls the classroom discourse The responsibility for promoting
efficient and effechve language use resides with the teacher Thus, the teacher's use of language can
get the best out of a group of learners- that is, facilitating contnbutions, helping them say what they
mean, understand what they are studying and making sure the rest of the group is able to follow - is
dependent on a teacher's ability-to make professional use of language This ability has to be learned
and prachsed over hlne, in the same way that we teachers acquire and perfect classroom teaching
skills ln order to make our classroom discourse meaningful and effective we need to understand
some of the desired features of an effecb.ve classroom discourse ]n the next secb.on we v,tll. discuss
these features of classroom discourse
20
Indirect repair: This repair strategy is covert. In this strategy instead of correcting an error directly,
the teacher tries to get the correct response from the learner by giving hints and cues. In other words
the teacher tries to elicit the correct response through questions or appropriate prompts. Example:
Sh1dcnt: My brother like bikes...
Teacher: Your brother. ...?
Sh1dcnt: like bikes...
Teacher: hc ...you arc talking about your brothcr ...hc...
Sh1dcnt: likes bikes...
Form-focused feedback: This is also called language centered repair. It refers to feedback given on
the words used, not the message. Sec the example below:
Sh1dcnt: I am belonging from the Delhi
Teacher: I am from Delhi...not the Delhi...not am belonging ...
Content feedback: This is also called content-centered repair. It refers to feedback given to the
message rather than the words used:
Sh1dcnt: During summers I go my grandmother's house ...I like spending time there.
Teacher: What do you do there?
Sh1dcnt: I likes play football and listen stories of grandmother.
Teacher: ok ...that's intcrcsting...grandmothcr's stories arc always intcrcsting ...Docs your grandma
make those stories? Or docs she read them from a book?
As we can sec here the teacher gives feedback on the message and ignores the language errors of the
learners. She further asks genuine questions related to the content of the message. The teacher's aim
in this interaction is to clearly promote fluency and get learners to speak. If our pedagogic goal is to
develop fluency then direct repair is not recommended. However, if our goal is to develop accuracy
then grammatical input in the form of direct repair is desired. In other words language- focused
feedback is appropriate for accuracy based tasks whereas content based feedback allows learners to
express themselves freely without getting conscious. For fluency based tasks we should avoid direct
repair. Therefore, to facilitate interaction we need to match our pedagogic goals with our repair
strategics just like our questioning strategics need to match our desired pedagogic goals.
Q. How can we encourage Negotiated Interaction in our Classroom and thereby break the IRF
structure?
Ans. The above strategics need to be incorporated in our classroom discourse in a balanced manner
so that we can facilitate learning. Matching each of these strategics with our pedagogic goals will give
us the desired effect. When we use multiple and appropriate strategics to manage our classroom
interaction we succeed in promoting negotiated interaction. Instead of accepting the first learner
contribution we need to push the learners to interact adequately. In order to understand negotiated
interaction we now him to the issue of talk management and topic management.
Talk management
Talk management is defined as an "activity" of classroom discourse. It refers to the ways in which the
participants (teacher and the learners) conduct their classroom conversation in order to achieve their
immediate learning goals. The stmchirc of information exchange determines the way in which the
talk is managed. In other words, the types of questions asked and the kinds of responses determine
how it is controlled. The IRF sequence (as discussed in earlier sections) is considered to be the most
commonly found stmchirc of information exchange where I stands for teacher initiation, R for learner
response and F is the feedback provided by the teacher. This stmchirc doesn't allow learners to
21
interact freely or to genuinely communicate and express their ideas. In classrooms where the teacher
tightly controls the talk it gives rise to an IRF sequence dominated interaction which is extremely
limited. Negotiated interaction helps teachers to break the IRF pattern as teachers engage in jointly
generating meaningful classroom talk. For example, the teacher's questions may try to elicit learner
responses which arc based on their own opinions and interpretations and not facts directly taken
from textbook. We should try to encourage the learner to strngglc to express themselves by providing
linguistic and paralinguistic cues. In classrooms where negotiated interaction is missing the teachers
end up answering their own questions or they stop with the first 'correct' response. This doesn't
allow opporhmitics for other learners to stretch their linguistic repertoire and take part in classroom
discourse.
Asking more referential questions that seek information and allow open-ended answers facilitate
meaningful interaction as compared to asking display questions that restrict teachers and learners to
exhibit their linguistic competence only.
Kumaravadivclu (2003) points out that asking referential questions alone need not break the IRF
chain. Teachers need to pay attention to the meanings of the responses rather than treat questions and
responses in a routine and rihmlizcd manner
Real negotiated interaction can take place only if we focus on the meaning contained in the learners'
responses rather than evaluate it linguistically and move on. We need to connect our talk
management with effective topic management.
Topic management
We should give freedom to the learners to nominate topics as it provides an effective basis for
intcractional opporhmitics. Topicalization is defined as a process by which learners take up
something the teacher or another learner says and (attempt to) make it into next topic. There arc
several advantages of letting learners have control over the topic:
• Linguistic complexity of the input can be tailored to the learners' own level.
• It can also create better opporhmitics for negotiating meaning when a communicative
problem occurs
• It can also facilitate the production of more complex and extensive output on the part of the
learner
Research has shown that learners benefit more from self-and peer-nominated topics than from
teacher-nominated topics as they arc more likely to create and sustain motivation among the learners
and give them a sense of freedom and achievement in taking some control of the classroom discourse.
Even learners who do not participate directly in the interaction by initiating a response benefit
unknowingly from their peers' contributions. Thus, it not only results in increased opporhmity for
practice but also enables learning.
In topic as well as him management we teachers play a crncial role. It cannot be denied that the
strnchirc of information exchanged (whether it will be IRF or not) to a large extent depends on the
teacher, his/her questions, ways to manage hims and the degree of freedom he/she allows to let
learners take over topic nomination.
22
• Content and Language Integrated Teaching (CLIT) supports contcxhrnlizcd learning;
languages taught arc useful for language that is embedded within relevant discourse contexts
rather than as isolated language fragments. Hence sh1dcnts make greater connections with
the language and what they already know.
• Motivates students - complex information is delivered through real life contexts for sh1dcnts
to grasp well.
• Greater flexibility and adaptability in the curriculum can be deployed as per sh1dcnts'
interest.
• CLIT is sh1dcnt-ccntrcd, one of its goals is to keep sh1dcnts interested and motivated by
generating stimulating content, instruction and materials.
• In such classrooms, instead of the lcch1rc method, sh1dcnts learn through doing and arc
actively engaged in the learning processes.
• Central to CUL is that learning happens not only through teacher input but through peer
input and inaction. Sh1dcnts assume active social roles in the classroom that involves
interactive learning, negotiating the information gathered and co-constructing the meaning.
23
This reveals how the mathematical ideas and thinking are conveyed in language in assumptions,
calculations, logical sequencing and thinking. Prepositions, determiners and conjunction play
important role in making the calculations effective. For example, 'into' matters more when we do a
multiplication.
Q. Write a lesson plan in science for class VIII using LAC as one of Strategies?
Ans. The English language has a unique role today in the educational scene of this country. It is
taught as a language across the country and it is also the medium of learning in number of schools.
There is also an increasing demand for the language (NCERT, 2005). Teaching of Science,
Mathematics and Technology through Indian languages medium also present difficulties when
translating the terminologies originating from Latin, Greek, and so on. This demands serious
attention by the teacher who needs to find ways to use the languages (as a tool) to make learners
comprehend the concepts. All the languages available in the classroom come in handy to support
learning. The position paper on Teaching of English (NCERT, 2006) while making a case for whole
language perspective for teaching-learning of language stresses the need for supplementary and
complementary roles for languages, particularly for English as a second language. English does not
stand alone. It needs to find its place.
• along with other Indian languages
i) in regional-medium schools: how can children's other languages strengthen English
teaching/learning?
ii) in English-medium schools: how can other Indian languages be valorised, reducing the
perceived hegemony of English?
• in relation to other subjects:
A language-across the- curriculum perspective is perhaps of particular relevance to primary
education. Language is best acquired through different meaning making contexts, and hence all
teaching is in a sense language teaching. In the initial stages contexhial meaning supports language
use, at later stages meaning may be arrived at solely through language.
24
organized and made (more) effective. This complexity of the teaching-learning sihiation presents us
as individual teachers with a challenge - that of monitoring several aspects of the achial sihiation and
going as far as possible to take account of the information obtained as a lesson progresses. A plan for
teaching should not be followed strictly like a recipe, but used as a starting point for further
'sihiation-spccific' decisions. This need for modification or adjustment of plans is what our earlier
discussion of flexible planning points to. What learners in a given class will achially do (or be
prepared to try to do seriously) - and this is their contribution to the lesson - cannot be controlled, or
even predicted accurately when planning in advance. Hence the teacher must keep getting 'up to
date' information (especially about the learner involvement and progress) and 'finc-hmc' her planned
inputs accordingly. Monitoring is the means of obtaining feedback on an ongoing basis so that
teaching can be made sensitive or responsive to the immediate sihiation in the class. We have already
seen that a predisposition to monitor (informally) is present in teachers.
Monitoring needs to be carried out in a more conscious and systematic manner if it has to help with
'improving' instmction. Monitoring of instmction can, of course, be done by others (outsiders) as
well. This has advantages and disadvantages. Herc our focus is on self-monitoring. This process as
noted above, helps immediately in the (more) effective handling of given lessons. In the long term, it
plays a major role in enhancing the teacher's professional skills. The rationale for self-monitoring can
be summed up as shown below.
• A teacher who has an awareness of teaching and its different components is better prepared
to make appropriate judgements and decisions in teaching.
• Critical reflection can trigger a deeper understanding of teaching. Critical reflection, as we
saw earlier, involves examining our own experiences as a basis for decision-making and sclf
dcvelopmcnt. It involves asking questions about how and why things arc the way they arc,
the value systems they represent, alternatives available, etc.
• Much can be learned about teaching through self-inquiry. Very often class visits by outsiders
arc not feedback-oriented but arc judgement-oriented. Moreover, rather than depending on
external sources for information, the approacl1 that seems to have a lot of potential for self
development is one where teachers monitor and collect information about their teaching
either individually or through collaborating with a colleague and making decisions about
what alternatives to adopt. Lawrence Sten house, a well-known expert in curriculum
rcscarch, is of the opinion that all well-founded curriculum research and development,
whether the work of an individual teacher, of a school, of a group working in a teachers'
centre or of a group working within the coordinating framework of a national project, is
based on the sh1dy of classrooms. It thus rests on the work of teachers. He further adds: 'It is
not enough that teachers' work should be sh1dicd: they need to sh1dy it themselves'.
• Another related concept to self-monitoring is the view that experience by itself is insufficient
as a basis for professional growth. We know that for many experienced teachers, many
classroom routines and strategics arc applied almost automatically and do not involve a great
deal of conscious thought and reflection. Experience is the starting point, but for the
experience to play a productive role, it is necessary to examine such experience
systematically. For this, systematic procedures arc needed. A more detailed discussion of
these points is available in Richards and Lockhart (1994). Self-monitoring then is
'illuminative' because it involves raising the consciousness of teachers as to what is ach1ally
happening in the classroom as opposed to what is supposed to happen. It is also formative in
purpose since the information we get about the process and product of teaching/learning can
25
be immediately fed back to alter or improve our own class. Therefore, it involves descriptions
of what happened, and why and how this self-awareness helps in developing deeper insights
into the complexities of a classroom. Therefore, monitoring plays a major role in a teacher's
self-development. Monitoring therefore involves systematic observation and explanation of
dassrnom prnccsscs.
26
BEGS-185: English Language Teaching
GUESS PAPER-3
27
• A rising emphasis on grammar driven texts.
• The texts used arc often very short and do not take the reader through the language
experience.
• Literature tends to get neglected in the course books.
• Most of the activities arc language stimulated and do not focus on critical and analytical
thinking.
• Most of the books and the activities underestimate the learner linguistically, intcllcchially and
emotionally.
Areas of focus in developing materials should be:
• localization and personalization of materials
• emphasis on creativity and flexibility
• more learner centred
• more content that is meaningful to the learner
• global and multiculh1ral content
• content that engages the learner and challenges him/her
• more involvement of other sources like media, internet, technology etc.
• more workshops to train teachers to write materials.
It is always advisable in the interest of the language learner that these books arc developed by
professionals who arc experienced and competent in the area of language learning and teaching and
who arc not led by commercial needs of publishing houses. Teachers, very often do not make good
material writers, but if given the right training and exposure there is no reason to believe that this is
not possible. Experiments in many parts of the world where national instih1tcs have involved teachers
in writing materials have proved that teachers can make great contributions to text book writing.
28
• They may result in dcskilling the teacher. When teachers become too dependent on the
textbook and the accompanying teacher's manual, then the teacher's role gets reduced to a
technical role of just presenting materials.
• They may also be expensive for the sh1dcnts.
Measuring the potential value of the material for the user can be termed as evaluation of the material.
Some of the areas that need to be evaluated when looking at material arc:
• appeal to the learner
• credibility of the material vis-a-vis the stakeholders
• validity and reliability of the material
• The ability of the material to motivate.
• The value of the materials in academic performance and in enhancing communicative skills.
• the flexibility of the materials
• the internal ability of the material to move the learner and the teacher to higher levels of
learning, i.e. critical and analytical thinking.
• The appropriacy of the material vis-a-vis the syllabus, standards required and benchmarks
29
The first stage is the posing of some initial questions on the usefulness of the teaching materials;
The second stage is using more searching questions to ascertain the effectiveness of the material with
particular learners. The questions could relate to:
• Comparison with other textbooks available
• The approach adopted in the textbook
• The emphasis given to all the four skills
• The balance between linguistic competence and communicative competence
• The methodology of transacting the material
• The language stmchircs dealt with and the approach used
• Logical sequencing of the content
• Selection of content-authenticity
• Meeting learning needs
• Balance between visual material and text
• Design of the layout
30
Steps in evaluating a task:
Collecting the information
This can be done before, during and after the task is attempted by the sh1dcnts.
Analysing the information
This involves quantifying the information which can be presented in a tabular form.It can also be
presented qualitatively where sh1dcnt's responses arc elicited in the form of quotes.
Reaching conclusions and making recommendations
Conclusions arc general statements and recommendations arc the evaluator's ideas regarding fuhirc
actions.
Writing the report
When the evaluator writes a report she has to clarify the procedures followed and in doing so is more
likely to understand the strength and weakness of the sh1dy. Micro evaluation of a task is difficult but
it is advocated as one of the best forms of evaluation Firstly, it gets teachers to evaluate as they plan
the lesson. Secondly, the procedure makes teachers more objective in their assessments. Thirdly, it
involves the teacher in some type of action research. Fourthly, it achially leads to professional
empowerment. While this type of evaluation is best for evaluating tasks, but can be very useful in
evaluating materials.
31
is a process in which materials are taken out rather than added. Materials should be
reduced through omission when the following situations are faced:
• Learners are clear about a language point.
• Learners are competent in a skill.
• There are too many tasks on a particular area/point.
• The item/area concerned is not a priority.
• The i tern/task is not well designed.
• The item/task is not well-suited to its airn(s).
• The topic is not appropriate for learners.
(3) Modification/changing: Modification means changes in different aspects of materials, such
as linguistic level, exercises, assessment system and so on. Modification of materials is
applicable/ appropriate in the following sihiations:
• Texts are of inappropriate length.
• Materials are inappropriate to the aim
• Materials are inappropriate to the learners' age/ experience.
• Materials are unclear, confusing or misleading.
• Tasks are badly designed.
(4) Simplification: This procedure is employed to make materials less complicated or easier to
understand. If the language teaching material is found to be difficult or mechanical for the
target learner, it (material) can be made suitable for the learner through the process of
simplification.
(5) Rearrangement/re-ordering: Rearrangement is a procedure of materials adaptation
through which different parts of a course book are arranged in a different order or
sequence. Rearrangement of materials helps to make them comparatively more interesting
and appropriate for the learner as well as the teacher.
32
Swe et Searcl1 is a Search Engme for Students Sweet search has a lmuted number of sites for students
It has only 35,000 Websites wluch have been evaluated and approved by staff of research experts,
hbrarians and teachers Educators across the globe consider it to be a site with lots of mfonnab.on to
help with instrucb.on and have labelled it as the hbrarian of the Internet Sweet Search allows students
to choose the most relevant result from a hst of rehable results, without the distraction of
untrushvorthy sites
33
restricted to prevent disn1ption or vandalism. Users can contribute anonymously, under a
pseudonym, or, if they choose to, with their real identity. The fundamental principles by which
Wikipcdia operates arc the five pillars. The Wikipcdia community has developed many policies and
guidelines to improve the encyclopaedia; however, it is not a formal requirement to be familiar with
them before contributing.
Concordancer: A concordanccr is a piece of software which can be installed on a computer and also
accessed on the Internet. They arc extremely important if one wants to check language currency and
authenticity because it can search, access and analyse language from a large database called the
corpus. They arc particularly of use for examining the collocational relationships between words and
for exploring precise information about how language is used by the native speakers. Most teachers
generally rely on how they use the language when they teach rather than on a reliable source. They
do not have the knowledge about the existence of such resources and they prefer to go by their
instinct which may or may not be correct. Having access to a corpora of 'real use' language can be of
great help in validating our assumptions about how a particular word or a phrase can be used and in
what environments. To search a word in a concordanccr, one has to enter a word or phrase in the
query section to search for examples of how and where the word or phrase has been used. British
National Corpus is one such concordanccr to search for British English usage. Coca is a corpus of
contemporary American English and the concordanccr can be used to search for everyday usage of
American English in speech or writing. A query of 'taking tea' was entered in both the corpuscs and
the result has been given below.
Email: Electronic mail, commonly known as email is an asynchronous form of computer-mediated
communication. It may be considered as the most important of all Internet applications. It is a method
of exchanging digital messages from one person to another. Simultaneously, it can be sent to one or
more recipients. Email servers arc used to accept, forward, deliver and store messages for the users.
The users can access email whenever they have time for it. To access and use any Internet application,
one needs to register, and have a uscrnamc and password to browse that site. Having a valid email
account becomes important as it is a required field while filling up the registration form.
Email may be used as a language teaching tool as it provides an extension to what one is able to do in
a classroom to a venue outside the classroom. Email facilitates composing, sending and receiving real
authentic communication in the target language both with other sh1dcnts in the classroom and across
the world. Because of the storage capacity of e-mail, learners do not have to be in a synchronous
classroom. The exchange of messages can take place at any time of day. Users just have to log in to
read, reply or compose new e-mail from anywhere they have access to the Internet. It is these spatial
possibilities that help learners to spend as much time as they want to read and write in the target
language in a real communicative context rather than learning only in the confines of classroom time
and place. It helps in providing learners with additional input and output in the target language
resulting in more interaction than was ever possible in the traditional language learning classroom.
The activities that can be done using email arc immense, provided teachers use their imagination.
Real tasks woven around one to one email interaction, group email exchanges, and email with the
class or between other classes or with independent learners outside the school whether in the same
city/country or any other arc possible as language learning activities. Some possible activities could
be weekly email essay/ letter/ story writing assignments which arc closely integrated into language
teaching without losing sight of the content of the curriculum. However, in the context of large
classes, sending individual feedback to learners would mean sending hundred odd emails which
34
becomes difficult for teachers. To solve such problems collaborative or group projects would be more
useful, as feedback would be limited to the group rather than to individual sh1dcnts.
35